Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Team Alignment Map Intro Guide
Team Alignment Map Intro Guide
The TAM is a visual chart that allows participants to hold more productive meetings,
structuring the content of their conversations according to four key pillars that lead to a
better execution of their work. The TAM has extensively been tested upon for-profit and
non-profit organisations that belong to the healthcare and luxury industries, as well as
across humanitarian organisations, public administrations and tech start-ups. It presents
the following advantages:
How will we address the challenges and seize the opportunities we face as a society at the
brink of a Fourth Industrial Revolution? From the sustainable development goals and their
ambition to reduce gas emissions, increase worldwide employment and feed 9 billion
people by 2050, to the innovation breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, robotics,
nanotechnology and biotechnology to name a few, we live in a complex world.
To deal with this level of complexity, cross-functional teams are needed, i.e. teams of
specialists working with each other (and not around each other) in which every specialist
brings the best of his or her talent to the team, in a mutually prolific exchange.
79%
« 79% of executives agree that the future workforce will be
structured more by projects — work focused on joint goals
completed in collaborative teams — than by job function. »
75%
« Collaboration is the number-one trait CEOs are seeking
in their employees, with 75 percent of CEOs calling it
critical. »
Great failures do not happen overnight, they are the consequence of the accumulation of
thousands of small problems, most of which draw their strength from undetected
misunderstandings between stakeholders. These failures are not inescapable, tools exist
that can break these negative spirals at the source, i.e. unsuccessful meetings.
75%
« 75% of cross-functional teams are dysfunctional. »
3. SEAMLESS EXECUTION
Relevant common knowledge enables effective team alignment because participants make
successful predictions about each other. This turns into a harmonious execution of activities,
a seamless division of work and integration of individuals’ parts.
1. 2. 3. 4.
Successful Relevant Seamless More
Conversations Common Knowledge Execution Successful
CONVERSATION IS THE TECHNOLOGY
OF MANAGEMENT
The power of conversation comes first; that’s why meetings are so crucial to the success of
any project. Meetings are often criticised simply because they are unsuccessful, they don’t
help the participants create « good » common knowledge and execution suffers. As a
conversational tool, the TAM gives common knowledge a boost by improving the quality
of simple conversations and of complex conversational flows.
60-90%
« Managing is between 60 and 90 percent oral. »
Each building block of the TAM illustrates essential information to be discussed during your
team meetings. The content of the columns must be discussed and validated by the whole
team to minimise perception gaps. When perception gaps are left unattended, they can
turn
Our Joint into coordination surprises and can eventually lead to project failure, what the TAM
Activity
helps you prevent.
Joint Objectives
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
CONVERSATION AREA
Focuses the conversation on the 4
minimal requirements for effective
team alignment
©
Place the Team Alignment Map on a wall and provide sticky notes and pens to each
participant.
Entry of meeting
1. Steps 1-2: fill the context information
Body of meeting
2. Steps 2-6: perform a forward pass
3. Steps 7-9: perform a backward pass
4. Seek every participant’s validation
5. If yes: go to 7
6. If no: back to point 1 (enter the refinement loop)
Exit of meeting
7. Share the TAM with the team
Our Joint Activity
Joint Objectives
1. 2.
TOPIC PERIOD
Joint Commitments
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
FORWARD PASS
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
3. 4. 5. 6.
BACKWARD PASS
9. 8. 7.
1. 2.
Define Set
Topic Period
FORWARD PASS
REFINEMENT LOOP
3. 4. 5. 6.
BACKWARD PASS
9. 8. 7.
Joint Objectives
TOPIC PERIOD
Joint Commitments
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
Let’s discover how Mark, Lucy, Ian, Lea and Simone use the TAM to boost alignment in a
marketing project meeting.
1.
TOPIC eting Strategy PERIOD 4 w e e ks
Develop Mark
Joint Commitments
Implicit Explicit
2. JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
It consists of filling in the 4 columns with appropriate content: what joint objectives, what
joint commitments, what joint resources and joint risks exist for our team. Rapidly a big
picture emerges — both, in terms of expectations and problems — on which participants
can reflect and improve the way to jointly approach work.
Joint Objectives
TOPIC PERIOD
Joint Commitments
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
FORWARD PASS
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
3. 4. 5. 6.
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Joint Risks Secondary
Underestimated research Under Control
Do as-is analysis
©
Perform
competitor
analysis
Beware !
To be effective, joint commitments require
sufficient mutual trust. In case of doubt, trust
your feelings and ask for more evidence of
commitment.
Joint Objectives
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Joint Risks Secondary
Lea & Simon
e
Underestimated research Under Control
ALL - report
Do as-is analysis problems and
© analyse
Perform
Mark, Lucy, Ian
competitor
analysis
Examples
• Need +10k budget
• Insufficient culture of digital
• Lack of motivation in team
• Miss project management skills
Joint Objectives
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Joint Risks Secondary
Lea & Simon
e
Underestimated research Under Control
Miss databa
se
access
ALL - report
Do as-is analysis problems and
© analyse
Perform
Mark, Lucy, Ian
competitor
analysis
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Joint Risks Secondary
Lea & Simon
e
Underestimated Under Control Client is not
research
Miss databa available
se
access
ALL - report
Do as-is analysis problems and
© analyse
e on
Over-relianc
data
Ian lacks time
The Backward Pass removes as much content as possible from the joint resources and joint
risks columns by adding, adapting or withdrawing content on the rest of the map, i.e.:
(2) Renegotiating any content of the map: topic, period and the content of the columns.
TOPIC PERIOD
Joint Commitments
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
BACKWARD PASS
9. 8. 7.
Key Question: “How can we engage the How to transform Joint Resources and Joint
resources we have/get the resources we are Risks?
For every note in the Joint Resources and in
missing and reduce our risk exposure?”
the Joint Risks columns :
Items in Joint Resources illustrate a needed
resource whereas items in Joint Risks a 1. Discuss: can we remove this note by creating
possible event that might jeopardise the new joint objectives and joint commitments,
success of the project. Concrete actions must or by renegotiating any other content
present on the map?
be undertaken so that each contributor has
access to resources he or she needs and also 2. Transform: if the answer is “yes", adapt the
to minimise the impact of harmful events. map and remove the note you’ve just discussed,
the problem has been addressed.
TOPIC g Strategy
PERIOD 4 w e e ks
etin
Joint Commitments Develop Mark
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Secondary Lea & Simon
e
research
Joint Risks
✗
Underestimated Under Control Client is not
Miss databa
se available
ALL - report access
Do as-is analysis problems and
analyse
Perform
mpetitor
co© Mark, Lucy, Ian
analysis Ian lacks time e on
Over-relianc
data
Schedule
8. meetings ahead Mark
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Secondary Lea & Simon
e
Joint Risks
research
✗
Underestimated Under Control
Miss databa
se
access
ALL - report
Do as-is analysis problems and
analyse
©
e on
Perform Over-relianc
Mark, Lucy, Ian Ian lacks time data
competitor
analysis
tings
Schedule mee Mark
ahead
7. Grant database
Lea
access
Designed by Stefano Mastrogiacomo.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. www.teamalignment.co
9.
SET JOINT DELIVERY DATES AND JOINT
VALIDATION
TOPIC PERIOD
eting Strategy 4 w e e ks
Joint Commitments Develop Mark
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Secondary Taylor & Alex
July 18th research
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
ALL - report
July 14th Do as-is analysis problems and
analyse
Perform
Mark, Thomas, Ian
July 14th ©mpetitor
co
analysis e on
Over-relianc
Ian lacks time data
Schedule
June 17 th meetings ahead Mark
9.
Joint Objectives
TOPIC PERIOD
eting Strategy 4 w e e ks
Joint Commitments Develop Mark
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Secondary Taylor & Alex
July 18th research
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
ALL - report
July 14th Do as-is analysis problems and
analyse
Perform
Mark, Thomas, Ian
July 14th ©mpetitor
co
analysis e on
Over-relianc
Ian lacks time data
Schedule
June 17 th meetings ahead Mark
TOPIC PERIOD
eting Strategy 4 w e e ks
Joint Commitments Develop Mark
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Perform
Secondary Taylor & Alex
July 18th research
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
ALL - report
July 14th Do as-is analysis problems and
analyse
Perform
titor Mark, Thomas, Ian
July 14th ©mpe
co
an al ys is
e on
Over-relianc
Ian lacks time da ta
Schedule
June 17 th meetings ahead Mark
Grant database
June 17th Lea
access
9.
Joint Objectives
TOPIC PERIOD
Joint Commitments
mplicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
Joint Objectives
TOPIC PERIOD
Joint Commitments
Implicit Explicit
JOINT JOINT JOINT JOINT
OBJECTIVES COMMITMENTS RESOURCES RISKS
What do we want to achieve together? Who does what for whom? What resources do we need? What can prevent us from succeeding?
Joint Resources
Unavailable Available
Joint Risks
Underestimated Under Control
BEFORE AFTER
a meeting with the TAM a meeting with the TAM
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Stefano Mastrogiacomo, PhD
Stefano Mastrogiacomo is the designer of the Team Alignment Map, the Team Alignment
Kanban, the Team Alignment Snapshot and the Team Alignment Contract. Tools that help
cross-functional leaders and teams manage better transitions to agility and deliver more
successful innovation projects.
© Stefano Mastrogiacomo
www.teamalignment.co