Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

• Mastering Strategic Management • Beer Strategies…

• Generic Bus Strategies


Chapter 5 Two competitive dimensions are key:
Selecting Business-Level Strategies
• Source of competitive advantage
• SWOT – Your Public Library
• keep costs down or
• Learning Objectives
• offer something unique in market
Understanding the four main generic strategies,
and their limitation • Scope of operations

• Advantages & disadvantages of a cost • target all possible customers or


leadership or best-cost strategy, & focus on a smaller segment or
economies of scale sub-section of market

• Differentiation, focussing on a target • Economics In Action


market What is your favorite restaurant?
• Describe the nature of focused cost What’s their strategy? cost leadership or niche
leadership and focused differentiation
Effective strategy must offers low prices, provides
• Combining – A Best-Cost Strategy satisfactory quality, & attract enough customers to
• What does it mean to be ‘Stuck in the be profitable.
middle’? • Key Takeaways
• Is understanding your Strategy really Business-level strategies examine how firms
important? compete in a given industry
“Would you tell me, please, • Generic strategies based on source of
which way I ought to go from competitive advantage - price or
here?” said Alice. differentiation, &
“That depends a good deal on • Scope of operations targets a broad or
where you want to get to,” said narrow market
the Cheshire cat.
Section 5.2 Cost Leadership
“I don’t much care care where…”
said Alice. • Cost Leadership

‘Then it doesn’t matter which • Cost leadership: Generic strategy that offers
way you go,” said the cat. products or services with acceptable quality
and features to a broad set of customers at
- Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland a low price
• 5.1 Generic Strategies • Economies of scale: Exists when the costs
A general way of positioning a firm’s business level of offering goods and services decreases as
strategy within an industry the firm is able to sell more items

• Focusing on generic strategies allows • Expenses are distributed across a


executives to concentrate on the core greater number of items
elements of firms’ business-level strategies • From Theory to Reality (Porter)
• Builds on the strategic resources available Cost Leadership
to the firm
• Become the low cost producer in its industry
• The most popular set of generic strategies
is based on the work of Professor Michael • Sources of cost advantage are varied and
Porter HBR depend on the structure of the industry, may
include pursuit of economies of scale,
• Strategies proprietary technology, preferential access
Strategy - a road map of the actions an to raw materials and other factors
entrepreneur draws up to achieve a company’s • Low cost producer must find and exploit all
mission, goals, and objectives. It is the company’s sources of cost advantage to achieve and
game plan for gaining a competitive advantage. sustain overall cost leadership
• Three basic strategies: • Leads to above average performance in its
industry
• Assuming can set prices at or near industry provides satisfactory quality, and attracts enough
average customers to be profitable.
• Overall Cost Leadership Section 5.3 Differentiation
Integrated tactics • Differentiation
• Aggressive construction of efficient-scale Differentiation strategy: A generic strategy that
facilities attempts to convince customers to pay a premium
price for its good or services by providing unique
• Vigorous pursuit of cost reductions from
and desirable features
experience
• Using a differentiation strategy firm compete
• Tight cost and overhead control
based on uniqueness, rather than price
• Avoidance of marginal customer accounts (only)

• Cost minimization in all activities in the • Success depends on offering unique


firm’s value chain, such as R&D, service, features that CUSTOMERS value!
sales force, and advertising
• and communicating this enhanced value to
• Cost Leadership gone bad - Remembering the potential customers
the Yugo…
• Colman Stove
• How do you make a Yugo go faster? A
Differentiation strategy:
towtruck
• 7 Decades, same basic design!
• What do you call a Yugo’s shock
absorbers? Passengers • Higher quality, & higher price
• How can you get a Yugo to do 60 miles an • Value includes reduced risk of
hour? Push it over a cliff
• failure… (1 moving part!)
• The new Yugo has an air bag. When you
• Part branding/marketing
sense an impending accident, start
pumping real fast. • Differentiation
• A friend went to a dealer the other day Seeks to be unique in its industry along some
and said, "I'd like a gas cap for my dimension(s) that are widely valued by buyers
Yugo." The dealer replied, "Okay.
Sounds like a fair trade.” Typically, firm identify & improves this aspect of
product & Markets and sells at a price premium
• Two guys in a Yugo were arrested last
night in Oakland following a push-by • Differentiation
shooting incident Differentiation can take many forms
• Cost Leadership & Economics • Prestige/brand
Economics tells use cost leadership less effective • Quality
when
• Technology
• Small percentage of consumer’s overall
budget (salt) • Innovation

• Low volume of purchases (i.e. PSE) • Features

• Few alternatives (gasoline) • Customer service

• Higher search costs • Dealer network

• You (generally) get what you pay for!! • Missed Opportunity!!

• Economics In Action • Tilley – A Canadian Success Story

Think of three industries where a cost leadership • Adventurer clothing


strategy would be very difficult to develop or
• Hats sold by 2,000+ retailers around the
implement
world, & 1,500 USA retailers
agriculture, arms industry, and nuclear industry.
• Differentiation
• Key Takeaways
• Potential Pitfalls of Differentiation Strategies
Cost leadership is an effective business-level
strategy to the extent that a firm offers low prices,
• Uniqueness/differentiation that add little why these features are useful generally
valuable raises a firm’s costs of doing business
• Too much differentiation • Similar to overall Cost Leadership lower
overhead costs and economies of scale
• Too high a price premium
useful
• Differentiation that is easily imitated
• Depending on niche, may be open to
• Dilution of brand identification through duplication by competitors
product-line extensions, especially reduced
• Focused Cost Leadership
price extensions of brands (i.e. levis jeans
at Walmart) Could be based on:
• Failing to focus on Buyers perceptions of • Demographics (young women)
value (not the sellers)
• Geographic (small communities)
• Feature creep (too complex)
• Service (Drive through, no seating)
• The Internet
• Degree of Consumer involvement (Ikea self-
How has the arrival of the Internet created many assembly)
new low-cost options?
• Sales Channels (Home purchase – Avon,
How has it changed the low-cost game? Mary Kay)
Key Takeaways • Price level marketing (Dollar Stores)

 Differentiation can be an effective business- • (For clarity), Generic vrs Focused Cost
level strategy to the extent that a firm offers Leadership
unique features that convince customers to
• Key difference between overall Cost
pay a premium for their goods and services.
Leadership & Focused Cost Leadership is
Section 5.4 that while both groups use price as primary
Focused Cost Leadership & source of competitive advantage,
Focused Differentiation
• Focused cost leadership strategy requires
• Focused Cost Leadership and Focused competing based on price only within a
Differentiation narrow or limited marketplace

Focus strategies: The generic focus strategy rests • A firm following this strategy does
on competing (only) within a sub-section of the not necessarily charge the lowest
potential buyers instead of across all consumers prices in industry
within an industry.
• Instead, it charges low prices
• Firms select a target population in the relative to the other firms that
industry and tailors its strategy to serving compete within narrow target market
them to the (possible) exclusion of others
• Nature /size of target market varies
• Focused cost leadership: across market segment targeted
competing based on price, but only
• Focused Differentiation Leadership
within a narrow market
Focused differentiation strategy requires offering
• Focused differentiation: offering
unique features that fulfill demands of a narrow
unique features that fulfill the
market
demands of a sub-group of
consumers • While a differentiation strategy involves
offering unique features that appeal to a
• Focussed Cost Leadership
variety of customers, the need to satisfy the
Not cheapest everywhere, just cheapest here… desires of a narrow market means that the
pursuit of uniqueness is often take to the
• Focused Cost Leadership proverbial “next level” by firms using a
Firms that charge relatively low prices for a sub- focused differentiation strategy.
group of the overall marketplace. Could be based • The unique features provided by firms
on geography, demographics, channel (internet following a focused differentiation strategy
only) or features are often very specialized
• Difficult to execute - Creating unique • Focused Differentiation Leadership
features and communicating to customers
Could be based on:
• Higher quality product/service Key Takeaways
• Extensive R&D • Focus strategies can be effective business-
level strategies to the extent that a firm can
• Demographics (late middle age men)
match their goods and services to specific
• Geographic (‘warm’ retirement niche markets
communities)
Section 5.5
• Buying experience (Financial Services, Best-Cost Strategy
Cadillac)
Best-Cost Strategy
• Degree of Consumer Sophistication (high
• A best-cost strategy can be an effective
end stereo)
business level strategy to the extent that a
• After-sales support (Nordstrom's, HOG) firm offers differentiated goods and services
at relatively low prices.
• Focused Differentiation Strategies
• This strategy difficult to execute in part
• Advantages: because creating unique features and
• Higher prices can be charged communicating to customers why these
features are useful generally raises a firm’s
• Firms often develop tremendous costs of doing business.
expertise about niche products
(camping gear), & reputation (MEC) • Firms that manage to implement an
effective best-cost strategy are often very
• Disadvantages: successful!
• Limited demand available within Stuck in the Middle
niche may limit growth
• A situation where business level strategy
• Once its target market is being well
served, expansion may require • does not offer features that are
developing new skills / products / unique enough to motivate
markets consumers

• Niche could disappear or be taken • And, prices are too high to


over by competitors effectively compete on price

• Damaging attacks may come not • Usually, firms become stuck in the middle
only from larger firms but smaller not because they lack a well-defined
ones that adopt an even narrower strategy But because firms are simply
focus outmaneuvered by rivals

• Lights! Key Takeaways

You are selling lights. What are 3 different • When executing a business-level strategy, a
demographics that firms might target to establish firm must not become stuck in the middle
a focused strategy? between viable generic business-level
strategies by neither offering unique
Now, think of 3 different target or niche markets features nor competitive pricing.
that your firm could focus on that use lights (i.e.
airport landing strips) Stages of Industry Life Cycle

• Worth Noting… • Stages of Industry Life Cycle

No business level strategy can overcome a product • Stages of Industry Life Cycle
or service which is poorly designed FOR THE • Stages of Industry Life Cycle
MARKET IT WISHES TO SERVE or COMPETE
IN….. • Strategies in Introduction Stage

• Can include over developed for low-cost • Products are unfamiliar to consumers
market…
• Market segments not well defined
• Poorly thought out niches; too broad, too
• Product features not clearly specified
narrow
• Competition tends to be limited
• Value that consumer do not appreciate (with
$$) • Strategies in the Growth Stage
• Poor value proposition for consumers • Characterized by strong increases in sales
• Attractive to potential competitors 3. They ship crazy fast: Average delivery
time is is less than 2 days from order to
• Primary key to success is to build consumer
receipt. Before you say "give me a break,
preferences for specific brands
we can't do that," the stat is presumably
• Strategies in the Maturity Stage skewed by Amazon Prime & Zappos'
legendary free overnight delivery. Clearly
• Aggregate industry demand slows many, if not most of us can't afford this, so a
• Market becomes saturated, few new few more days isn’t critical, But the best
adopters companies stress the critical need for
maximum speed.
• Direct competition becomes predominant
4. They give money back as quickly as they
• Marginal competitors begin to exit take it: Among the peak performers, the
average time from return initiation to
• Strategies in the Decline Stage
processed refund is three days. Customers
• Industry sales and profits begin to fall don't want to wait for their money any more
than they want to wait for their orders.
• Strategic options become dependent on the
actions of rivals • In Conclusion,

Generic business strategies in clothing This chapter explained generic business-level


industry? strategies including low-cost, differentiation, or a
broad or narrow market focus strategy
1. Cost leadership strategy
Perhaps the best strategy, best cost, occurs when
• provide clothing at low prices with firms can offer relatively low prices while still
basic designs managing to differentiate goods or services
2. Differentiation strategy Between Globalization and Internet, competition
• provide clothes created by well- continues to increase, which suggests that
acclaimed designers, high quality, consistently sticking to their strategy is a good
high price predictor of firm success

3. Focused cost leadership strategy Whatever the strategy, avoid being “stuck in the
middle” by not offering sufficiently unique features
• Competing on price but narrow or competitive prices
market – i.e. safety
4. Focused differentiating strategy
• unique features fulfill demands of
narrow market – biking • Mastering Strategic Management

5. Best Cost strategy


Chapter 6
• Firms charge relatively low prices &
Supporting the Business-Level Strategy:
still offer substantial differentiation
Competitive and Cooperative Moves
valued by consumers
• Learning Objectives
• The Best Online Firm
(StellaService.com) Understand
1. They make sure customers can reach a • Different competitive moves commonly used
human being easily: How easily? The by firms
average time to a live agent for the highest-
rated subset of the 100 companies is 23 • When and how do firms respond to
seconds. Not minutes, seconds. competitive actions taken by their rivals

2. They respond to inbound messages with • Cooperate strategies to create mutual


lightning speed: Average time to reply to benefits (joint ventures, strategic alliances,
an email for the best companies is 1 hour etc.)
and 24 minutes. "We'll make every effort to • Making Competitive Moves
respond to you within 24-48 hours" definitely
doesn't cut it. The study of competitive moves draws from military
history, including Sun Tzu’s classic book, The Art of
• The Best Online Firm War
(StellaService.com)
Business strategists are familiar with a number of • Very hard to predict, but usually slow to
competitive moves that may help guide their firms develop
to victory.
• Market is always evolving, difficult to pick
• First Mover Advantage out which are truly disruptive amongst
market ‘noise’
• Disruptive Innovations
• Includes creating brand new market where
• Footholds
none existed before (i.e. Smart phone apps)
• Blue Ocean Strategy
• As market emerges or develops, other firms
• Bricolage must decide how to respond, embrace or
compete
• First Mover – Advantage or Not?
• (Relatively) Recent Disruptions!
• First Mover Advantage
• Energy Efficient light bulbs
A first-mover advantage exists when making the
initial move into a market allows a firm to establish • Kindle (Gaming)
a dominant position that other firms struggle to
• Electric & Driverless cars
overcome
• E-cigarettes
Recall - a strategic resource is an asset that is
valuable, rare, difficult to imitate, and non- • iphone apps/mobile computing/texting
substitutable.
• Robots - vacuum cleaners, lawn mowers
• Often requires significant R&D, & product too!
testing costs
• Social Media - U-Tube, Facebook,
• A first-mover cannot be sure that Pinterest, etc.
customers will embrace its offering, making
• Modern Container Shipping
a first move inherently risky
• Foothold (Beach-head) Strategy
• First movers must be willing to commit
sufficient resources to follow through on Value often far exceeds small size & costs of
their pioneering efforts maintenance
• First Movers Test market & faster expansion if things go well
Good News – Real disruptions usually takes some Can deter competitors & make harder to predict
time to catch on. Container shipping needed both next move
ships, railcars and trucks equipped to deal with
containers and container ports to load them • Blue Ocean Strategy

Bad News – very hard to identify what might be Involves creating a new, untapped market rather
invented soon… than competing with rivals in an existing market

• First Mover – How to Fail…. Creating a brand new market place

• Does the product/service provide a truly • Coffee Shops, Women’s underwear stores
sustainable competitive resource • Transportation - Mom Vans / SUV /
• Or is Innovation easy to copy, or worse Electronic
improve on... • Voluntourism
• Can company preferably continue to • Traditional Circus!
improve product, or at a minimum, match
product improvements (which are almost Circus
surely going to appear)
• Rides, side-shows & big tent
• Failure to market aggressively (it’s new,
• Mobile
consumers will not know its value for them)
• Increased competition from all other forms
• Disruptive Innovations,1902
of entertainment
Can you think of any?
• High costs (animals, travel)
• Disruptive
• Star performers
• Big change!
• But, Animal Activists,
• Affects whole market or industry
Focus on Adults
Combine Theatre, ballet & Acrobat • Making Cooperative Moves
Keep the clowns! • In addition to choosing their own firm’s
strategic actions, executives also have to
Dramatic experience / theme, org. music
decide whether and how to respond to
• Build a Better Mouse Trap? rival’s moves
Good luck with that…
• Research indicates that three factors
• Bricolage determine the likelihood that a firm will
respond to a competitive move: awareness,
• Most innovation are improvements to motivation, & capability ->
existing products (including new uses)
• Razor Wars!
• Many others, Bricolage, are joining two
products or services together to create • PS – Competitors…
something new
Just how do we know what they’re up to anyways?
• And, A few are true Blue Ocean events!
Corporate Intelligence
• Innovative vs Incremental
• gathering data & information
Regional Hub Model
• Everything from dumpster diving to satellite
• Baking Soda monitoring

How many uses can you think of? • Media monitoring, press releases, comp.
websites!
• Use as an antacid
• (the absence of) Speed Kills… (6.2.1)
• Underarm deodorant
• In hyper-competitive world, firms must cope
• Keep cut flowers fresh longer (add teaspoon with rapid-fire barrage of attacks from rivals
to vase)
• head-to-head advertising
• Put out small fires on rugs, upholstery, campaigns, price cuts, innovation &
clothing & wood attempts to grab key customers
• Put open container in fridge to absorb odors • Speed is essential in responding (or
• Turn baking soda into modeling clay by competitor may capture market…)
adding 1 1/4 cups of water to 1 cup of • Jack Welsh - success in most competitive
cornstarch rivalries “is less a function of grandiose
• Wipe your windshield with it to repel rain predictions than it is a result of being able to
respond rapidly to real changes as they
Other ideas - occur. That’s why strategy has to be
http://lifehackery.com/2008/07/22/home-4/ dynamic and anticipatory.”
• Key Takeaways • So…We Meet Again (6.2.2)
Firms can take advantage of a number of • With multipoint competition, firms faces
competitive moves to shake up or otherwise get same rival in multiple markets. Competitive
ahead in an ever-changing business environment. moves in one market can affect other
markets
• First mover advantage
• Cigarette makers R. J. Reynolds (RJR) &
• Disruptive Innovation
Philip Morris compete in many countries
• Blue ocean thinking
• In early 1990s, RJR introduced lower-priced
• Foothold cigarette brands. Philip Morris cut USA
prices to protect market share which started
• Bricolage a price war, ultimately hurt both
For teaching in two 90-minute classes/wk, • 2nd, Philip Morris started competing in
possible break point Eastern Europe where RJR had established
• 6.2 - Responding to Other’s Moves a strong position.

• Speed and Multipoint Competition • Combination of moves forced RJR to


protect its market share in USA & neglect
• Mutual Forbearance Eastern Europe
• Fighting Brands • Mutual forbearance
Mutual forbearance occurs when rivals do not act • By late 1980s, GM challenged by small,
aggressively because each recognizes that the inexpensive Japanese cars
other can retaliate in multiple markets
• GM wanted to recapture lost sales, without
• In late 1990s, Southwest Airlines & United harming existing brands, Chevrolet, Buick,
competed in some but not all markets & Cadillac, by putting their names on low-
end cars
• United announced plans to compete on
other routes • Solution – Geo brand
• Southwest threatened to retaliate in shared • Interestingly, several Geo models
markets & United backed down produced in joint ventures – Metro
& Tracker joint venture with
• Recognizing & acting on potential
Suzuki
forbearance can lead to better performance
through firms not competing away their • By 1998, market revolved around
profits, while failure to do so can be costly higher-quality vehicles, Geo
brand discontinued
• Responding to Disruptive Innovation (6.2.3)
• Fighting Brands - Airlines
• When rival introduces disruptive innovation,
firm have 3 choices • Some fighting brands are rather short lived.
• 1st, executives may believe that innovation • Two major airlines experienced similar
will not replace established offerings entirely futility.
& choose to focus on traditional business
• In response to the growing success of
models, ignoring disruption
discount airlines such as Southwest,
• For example, traditional bookstores AirTran, Jet Blue, and Frontier, both United
did initially consider Amazon to be a Airlines and Delta Airlines created fighting
competitive threat until online sales brands.
began to grow
• United launched Ted in 2004,
• 2nd, firm counter challenge by attacking discontinued 2009.
along a different dimension
• Delta’s Song only lasted from 2003
• For example, Apple responded to to 2006.
direct sales of cheap computers by
• Southwest’s acquisition of AirTran in 2011
Dell & Gateway by adding power
created a large airline that may make United
and versatility
and Delta lament that they were not able to
• 3rd possibility is to simply match make their own discount brands successful.
competitor’s move
• Key Takeaways
• Merrill Lynch, for example,
When threatened by the competitive actions of
confronted online trading by forming
rivals, firms possess numerous ways to respond,
its own Internet-based unit. Here the
depending on the severity of the threat including:
firm risks cannibalizing its traditional
business, but executives may find • Multipoint competition
that their response attracts an
entirely new segment of customers • Mutual forbearance

• Price Wars & Fighting Brands (6.2.4) • Responses to disruptive innovation

• Lowering prices, price wars, can be • Fighter brands


effective strategy in the short term • Speed of response
• But, may create long-term problem of trying 6.3 Making Cooperative Moves
to return to original price level, with new
consumer expectations • Making Cooperative Moves

• Creation of fighting brand is one strategy • In addition to competitive moves, firms can
that can prevent/reduce this problem benefit from cooperating with each other

• Fighting brand is a lower-end lower-cost • Cooperative moves such as forming joint


brand that a firm introduces to try to protect ventures and strategic alliances may allow
the firm’s market share without damaging firms to enjoy successes that might not
the firm’s existing brands. otherwise be reached

• Fighting Brands – GM & Geo


• Share (rather than duplicate) • Allowing each partner to concentrate
resources on activities that best match their
capabilities.
• Learn from each other’s strengths
• Learning from partners & developing
• Four types of Cooperative Moves
competences that may be more
• Joint venture is a cooperative arrangement widely exploited elsewhere.
that involves two or more firms each
• Better use of resources &
contributing to the creation of a new entity
competencies to survive
• Strategic alliance is a cooperative
• Disadvantages
arrangement between two or more
organizations that does not involve the • Potential to reduce future
creation of a new entity opportunities - unable to enter into
agreements with partner’s
• Co-location occurs when goods and
competitor
services offered under different brands are
located very close to each other • Lack of commitment to the
partnership
• Co-opetition refers to a blending of
competition and cooperation between firms • Risk of sharing too much knowledge
and the partner company becoming
• Joint Ventures
a competitor
Cooperative arrangement that involves 2 or more
• Co-location
firms each contributing to the creation of a new
entity. • Similar goods are located close to each
other
• The partners share decision-making
authority, control of the operation, & any • Fast food, hotels, auto-malls (cars)
profits
• The Mall
• Advantages & Disadvantages of Joint
• “Co-opetition”
Ventures
a blending of competition & cooperation between 2
• Advantages
firms
• Enter related businesses or new
• Dis/Advantages Co-location & Co-opetition
geographic markets or gain new
technological knowledge • Co-location Advantage
• Access to resources, specialized • A bigger set of customers may be
staff & technology attracted to a set of co-located firms
than (sum of) individual locations
• Sharing of risks with a venture
partner • Co-location Disadvantage
• Disadvantages • co-location can be very expensive
• Time and effort to build the • Co-opetition Advantage
relationship, challenges:
• reduction of transaction costs &
• The objectives of the venture are not other savings and increasing
100% clear and communicated to expectation among customers
everyone involved.
• Co-opetition Disadvantage
• There is an imbalance in levels of
expertise, investment or assets • competition and cooperation may
brought into the venture by partners. not be always successful between
two firms
• Strategic Alliances
• In Conclusion,
Cooperative arrangement between 2 or more orgs
that does not involve creation of new entity This chapter has considered various competitive
and cooperative strategies commonly used by firms
• Advantages & Disadvantages of Strategic
Alliances • When and how can firms respond to
competitive actions taken by their rivals, and
• Advantages the industry in general
• Various cooperate strategies to create • Suppliers
mutual benefits (joint ventures, strategic
• International production can increase
alliances, etc.)
Supply Chain risk through longer
transportation times, export/import
regulations
• Mastering Strategic Management
• But, better bargaining position with existing
suppliers
Chapter 7
• Stronger leverage when negotiating prices
Competing in International Markets
with suppliers, and potential for access to
• Learning Objectives new suppliers (reduce both costs & risk)
• Understand potential benefits & risks of • Lower costs from lower production costs
competing in international markets increases competitive potential
• Porter’s “diamond model”, predictors of • Summary – Benefits of International
success Presence
• International strategies Benefits
• multi-domestic strategy • Increase the size of potential market(s)
• global strategy • Economies of scale (lower average
costs/unit)
• transnational strategy
• Extend the life cycle of a product
• Options for entering international market
• Optimize the physical location for every
• Strategy in Action
activity in its value chain
Why have India & China become such attractive
• Performance enhancement
markets for International Strategies?
• Cost reduction
• 7.1 Entering the International Market
• Risk reduction
• Economies of Scale
• International Market Risk
More (international) customers lowers costs for
many goods • Political Risk of government upheaval or
interference
• Overhead (fixed costs) shared across more
sales • Unstable gov’ts make it difficult to
plan for future
• Shared Marketing costs (with different
language!) • Hostile gov’t may impose new taxes
& regulations
• Shared R&D
• Nationalization: Seizure of privately-owned
• Offshoring
businesses
• Offshoring involves relocating a business
• Economic risk: potential for adverse
activity (manufacturing) to another country
change in country’s economic conditions &
• It While it can reduce a firm’s costs of doing policies, property rights protections,&
business, the job losses in the firm’s home currency exchange harming viability of
country can devastate local communities, business
bad publicity
• Cultural risk: potential for a company’s
• Increase delivery time & costs, sometimes operations in a country to struggle due to
quality issues differences in language, customs, norms
and customer preferences
• Complexity of operating in a foreign culture
and language • Natural disasters too!

• Some recent trends to re-shoring • For example

• Potential Benefits • Natural disasters (Japan tsunami) and affect


on Japanese car manufactures
• Much cheaper labour costs
• NA smoking trends and cigarette companies
• Diversification of Risk(s)
• ‘Arabic Spring’
• Economic Risk Demand conditions: Developing excellence in
product, production, delivery, etc to serve domestic
Economic risk refers to the potential for a country’s
market, can create a strategic advantage when
economic conditions and policies, property rights
facing global market
protections, and currency exchange rates to harm a
firm’s operations within a country. • especially when domestic consumer have
high expectations of the goods & services
• Culture & Cultural Risk
that they buy
• Cultural Risk
• Car examples
• Risk that ignorance of cultural aspects will
• Japanese - high quality
damage firm’s chances of success is a
foreign market • French – loyalty to French
companies
• Culture is the shared assumptions and
beliefs or a group of people, businesses to • Germans – driving pleasure
nations
• Italian – styling
• Combination of visible and invisible - Hard
• USA - Big
to notice, simply how we do things around
here… • Factor Conditions (Diamond Model)
• And, dynamic… keeps changing Factor conditions: The nature of raw material and
other inputs that firms need in order to create
• Examples
goods and services
• Key Takeaways
• Firms benefit when they have good access
Competing in international markets involves to factor conditions and face challenges
important opportunities and daunting threats when they do not
• Opportunities include access to new • Overcoming disadvantages in factor
customers, lowering costs, and conditions leads companies to develop
diversification of business risk unique skills
• Threats include political risk, economic risk, • Just-in-time inventory management: A
& cultural risk production system that conserves space
and lowers costs, by requiring inputs to a
• 7.2 Drivers of Success & Failure
production process to arrive at the moment
• Friedman argues that advances in they are needed
technology, communications, and
• Related & Supporting Industries (Diamond
transportation have leveled the playing field
Model)
into a “Flat World”
• Degree of innovation, & flexibility
• Reduces the strategic element of geography
• Centers of Excellence – Silicon Valley, Drug
• But, research has NOT supporting all his
companies near Montreal
conclusions…
• Japanese excellence is space utilization
• Porter’s Diamond Model
• Cars, Detroit & Windsor
• Firm strategy, Structure, & Rivalry (Diamond
Model) • Univ Research Concentration
How challenging it is to survive domestic • Even cities are an example
competition
• Related & Supporting Industries (Diamond
• Companies that have survived intense Model)
rivalry within their home markets are likely
The likelihood that a firm will succeed in
to have developed strategies and structures
international markets is shaped by 4 aspects of its
that will facilitate their success when
domestic market:
competing in international markets
1. demand conditions
• New fast-food restuarants are an example
2. factor conditions
• Companies that are monopolies face a lot
more risk in competing internationally 3. related and supporting industries
• Demand Conditions (Diamond Model) 4. strategy, structure, & rivalry among
domestic competitors
For teaching in two 90-minute classes/wk, • Procter & Gamble seek efficiency by
possible break point creating global brands
• 7.3 Types of International Strategies • Global strategies also can be very
effective for firms whose product or
Multinational corporation: A firm that has
service is largely hidden from the
operations in more than one country (KFC,
customer’s view
Walmart, Kia)
• Types of International Strategies
International strategy - used to guide a firm’s effort
in various countries • Transnational Strategy: Involves
balancing the desire for efficiency with
• These strategies vary in emphasis on
responding to local preferences
achieving efficiency around world &
responding to local needs • Seeks a middle ground between a
multi-domestic strategy and a global
• There are 3 main international strategies
strategy
available:
• McDonald’s & KFC rely on the same brand
• Multi-domestic
names & core menu items around the world.
• Global But make some concessions to local tastes
too
• Transnational
• In France, wine can be purchased at
• Key Takeaways McDonald’s, [wine is a central
When threatened by the competitive actions of element of French eating]
rivals, firms possess numerous ways to respond, • What is the standard strategy? Why?
depending on the severity of the threat including:
• Automobiles
• Multipoint competition
• Takeout food
• Mutual forbearance
• Appliances
• Responses to disruptive innovation
• Gas
• Fighter brands
• Key Takeaways
• Speed of response
Multinational corporations choose from among
• The Tradeoff… three basic international strategies:
• Types of International Strategies 1. Multidomestic
Multi-domestic strategy: Sacrifices efficiency in 2. global
favor of being responsive to local preferences
within each market. 3. transnational

• MTV customizes programming within each These strategies vary in their emphasis on
county achieving efficiency around the world while
responding to local needs.
• H. J. Heinz adapts its products to match
local tastes & preferences. Because some • 7.4 Entry Options for Competing in
Indians will not eat garlic & onion, Heinz International Markets
offers them a version without these two
• Exporting
ingredients
• Relatively inexpensive way to
• Types of International Strategies
enter foreign market
• Global Strategy: Sacrifices responsiveness
• Assemble goods at home, &
to local preferences in favor of efficient &
ship - Minimal risk
economies of scales at global level
[complete opposite of multi-domestic • Uses local sales companies
strategy]
• Successful distributors
• Some minor local modifications may
• Have complementary products
be made, but offers essentially same
products or services in each market. • Behave as if business partners
• Microsoft offers same software • Invest in training, info sys,
programs globally, but adjusts for advertising & promo.
local languages
• Globalization depends Cheap Oil…. • License avoids absorbing a lot of costs, but
(Why Your World Is About to Get a Whole its profits are limited to the fees collected
Lot Smaller" by Jeff Rubin)
• The firm also loses some control over how
• Rising transportation costs favor local its technology is used, risk of copying
economy (i.e. steel)
• A historical example
• Local market
• World War II crippled Japan’s industrial
• Reduced competition infrastructure
• Smaller market • In response, Japanese firms imported a
great deal of technology, especially from
• Greater need for generalists
American firms
• 100 mile diet
• By 1950s, during Korean War, American
• Exporting military relied on Jeeps made in Japan
using licensed technology
• Once a firm’s products are found to be
viable in a particular country, exporting often • In just a few years, a mortal enemy had
becomes less desirable become a valuable ally!

• A firm that exports its goods loses control of • Franchising


them once they are turned over to a local
• Similar to licencing, except significantly less
firm for sale locally
investment
• But, local distributor may treat
• Good control over quality of product /
customers poorly and thereby
service
damage the firm’s brand
• Franchising Contract protects, but legal
• Distributors limited incentive for
systems different around world
loyalty…
• Local franchisees may behave in ways that
• Also, exporters may want their firm rather
the franchisor does not approve.
than a local distributor to enjoy the retail
profits, when products are sold to end • For example, Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC)
customers was angered by some of its franchisees in
Asia when they started selling fish dishes
• Licensing
without KFC’s approval.
• Franchisor receives a royalty or fee
• Often difficult to fix such problems because
• Franchisee gets to use trademark, patent, laws in many countries are stacked in favor
trade secret or other valuable intellectual of local businesses.
property
• Franchising
• Disadvantages
• Used by many firms, especially service
• Loss of control over its product industries, to develop a worldwide presence

• Licensee may become a competitor • Examples Subway, The UPS Store,


and Hilton Hotels
• Threat to brand name and reputation
of products • Franchisee uses brand name,
products, & processes in exchange
• Advantages for an upfront payment (franchise
• Limited risk exposure fee) & a percentage of revenues
(royalty fees)
• Expanded revenue base
• Attractive, requires little investment by the
• Licensing franchisor.
• Licensing frequently used in manufacturing • But, only get a small portion of the profits
made under its brand name
• involves granting a foreign company
right to create a company’s product • Last, franchises are only successful if
within a foreign country in exchange franchisees are provided with a simple and
for a fee effective business model. “Franchise
formula” must be perfected
• often center on patented technology
• Joint Venture
Partnerships enable firms to share risks & potential 5. creating a joint venture
profits. Partners:
• 2+ org each contribute to the
• gain exposure to new knowledge and creation of a new entity
technologies
6. strategic alliance\
• Develop core competencies that can lead to
• firms work together cooperatively,
competitive advantages
but no new org
• Gain information on local markets
• In 6 & 7, partners share decision
conditions
making authority, control of the
• Wholly Owned Subsidiary operation, & any profits
Local Business fully owned by a multinational • Strengths & Limitations of International
company Strategies
• Acquire an existing company in the home • Strengths & Limitations of International
country or develop a totally new operation Strategies
(greenfield venture)
Key Takeaways
• Most expensive and risky of all global entry
When entering a new country, executives choose
strategies
between
• Greatest control over all activities
• exporting
Kia, for example, spent $1 billion to build its US
• franchising
factory. Many firms are reluctant to spend such
sums in more volatile countries because they fear • licensing
that they may never recoup their investments.
• wholly owned subsidiary
• Wholly Owned Subsidiary
• A joint venture or strategic alliance
• Wholly Owned Subsidiary
The key issues of how much control a firm has over
• A wholly owned subsidiary is a business its operation, how much risk is involved, and what
operation in a foreign country that a firm share of operation’s profits the firm retains
fully owns.
• In Conclusion
• Can be greenfield venture or through
purchasing an existing local • Companies must consider benefits & risks
operation of entering international markets

• firm maintains complete control over • And, assess likelihood of success by


operation & keep all profits that the examining demand conditions, factor
operation makes conditions, related and supporting
industries, and strategy, structure, and
• A wholly owned subsidiary can be quite rivalry among its domestic competitors.
risky, due to expenses required to set it up
and operate it. • If choosing to venture overseas,
international strategy will be multi-domestic,
• Kia, for example, spent $1 B to build global, or transnational.
its US factory
• Then choose between exporting, creating a
• Many firms are reluctant to spend wholly owned subsidiary, franchising,
such sums in more volatile countries licensing, or creating a joint venture or
because they fear that they may strategic alliance.
never recoup their investments.
• KFC
• Policy in Action
Do you believe that KFC would have as successful
What are risks & benefits a Canadian firm in China today if executives had tried to make their
partnering with an (external) international company first store a wholly-owned subsidiary (instead of
using: Joint Venture)? Why or why not?
1. Exporting KFC would be unlikely as successful in China if
executives had tried to make their first store a
2. Creating a wholly owned subsidiary
wholly owned subsidiary. The company had chosen
3. franchising Beijing Corp. of Animal Production, Processing,
Industry & Commerce and Beijing Travel & Tourism
4. licensing
Corp. as their joint-venture partners. The success
of KFC can be traced to its use of local aspects,
local ingredients, both in its management team and
on its menus.

You might also like