Forer effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forer_effect&printable=yes

Forer effect
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Forer effect (also called the Barnum Effect after P.T. Barnum's observation that "we've got something for everyone") is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, and some types of personality tests. A related and more general phenomenon is that of subjective validation.[1] Subjective validation occurs when two unrelated or even random events are perceived to be related because a belief, expectancy, or hypothesis demands a relationship. Thus people seek a correspondence between their perception of their personality and the contents of a horoscope.

Contents
1 Forer's demonstration 2 Variables influencing the effect 3 See also 4 References 5 External links

Forer's demonstration
In 1948, psychologist Bertram R. Forer gave a personality test to his students. He told his students they were each receiving a unique personality analysis that was based on the test's results and to rate their analysis on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on how well it applied to themselves. In reality, each received the same analysis:

You have a great need for other people to like and admire you. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them. Disciplined and self-controlled outside, you tend to be worrisome and insecure inside. At times you have serious doubts as to whether you have made the right decision or done the right thing. You prefer a certain amount of change and variety and become dissatisfied when hemmed in by restrictions and limitations. You pride yourself as an independent thinker and do not accept others' statements without satisfactory proof. You have found it unwise to be too frank in revealing yourself to others. At times you are extroverted, affable, sociable, while at other times you are introverted, wary, reserved. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic. Security is one of your major goals in life.

On average, the rating was 4.26, but only after the ratings were turned in was it revealed that each student had received identical copies assembled by Forer from various horoscopes.[2] As can be seen from the profile, there are a number of statements that could apply equally to anyone. These statements later became known as Barnum statements, after P.T. Barnum.

Variables influencing the effect

1 of 2 15/07/2011 10:21

Forer effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forer_effect&printable=yes

Later studies have found that subjects give higher accuracy ratings if the following are true: the subject believes that the analysis applies only to him or her the subject believes in the authority of the evaluator the analysis lists mainly positive traits See Dickson and Kelly for a review of the literature.[3]

See also
List of cognitive biases Cold reading Horoscope

References
1. ^ Marks, David F (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic (http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Psychologyof-the-Psychic/David-F-Marks/e/9781573927987/?itm=1) (2 ed.). Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. pp. 41. ISBN 1573927988. http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Psychology-of-the-Psychic/David-F-Marks /e/9781573927987/?itm=1. 2. ^ Forer, B.R. (1949). "The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility". Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (American Psychological Association) 44 (1): 118123. doi:10.1037/h0059240 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1037%2Fh0059240) . 3. ^ Dickson, D.H.; Kelly, I.W. (1985). "The 'Barnum Effect' in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature". Psychological Reports (Missoula) 57 (1): 367382. ISSN 0033-2941 (http://www.worldcat.org /issn/0033-2941) . OCLC 1318827 (http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1318827) .

External links
The Fallacy of Personal Validation: A Classroom Demonstration of Gullibility By: Bertram R. Forer (Full Text) (http://www.scribd.com/doc/17378132/The-Fallacy-of-Personal-Validationa-Classroom-Demonstration-of-Gullibility) An autotest (http://homepage.bluewin.ch/Ysewijn/english_Barnum.htm) Online test demonstrating the effect (http://forer.netopti.net/) Skeptic's Dictionary: the Forer effect (http://www.skepdic.com/forer.html) A demonstration of the Forer effect (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btP_vy5cQq4) by Derren Brown Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forer_effect" Categories: History of astrology | Cognitive biases This page was last modified on 6 July 2011 at 15:23. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of use for details. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

2 of 2

15/07/2011 10:21