Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dichtheitspruefung - 300 S 9010595 en
Dichtheitspruefung - 300 S 9010595 en
Dichtheitspruefung - 300 S 9010595 en
Reference: 300-S-9010595-EN-00
Issue: 08.2017 1/7
Leak-testing
Published by
Bucher Hydraulics AG
Industriestrasse 15
CH-6345 Neuheim
Phone +41 41 757 03 33
Fax +41 41 757 05 00
Email info.ch@bucherhydraulics.com
Internet www.bucherhydraulics.com
Classification: 420.245.
2/7 300-S-9010595-EN-00/08.2017
Leak-testing
1 Overview / Summary
When testing the leak-tightness of a hydraulic elevator system, the fol
lowing considerations must be taken into account when the test is car
ried out with the ball valve closed. No hydraulic valve is completely leak-
free. The hydraulic engineer speaks of 'virtually zero leakage' or 'techni
cal leak-freeness' and defines leakage values of x drops per minute or
similar to quantify it. When an enclosed space is put under pressure, the
oil inside it is compressed. If it is now released drop by drop, the pres
sure drops again. The larger the space, the more oil is compressed.
Therefore more oil must also escape for the pressure to fall again.
Some people measure the leak-tightness of hydraulic valves by closing
the ball valve when the system is under pressure, and then measuring
the time until the pressure in the enclosed space drops below a certain
value. However, this only works if the ball valve has leak-free sealing,
and if the size of the enclosed space is taken into account.
In the case of the iValve-i250, the enclosed volume is 2.7 times smaller
than that of an LRV1-175. In the experiment described in this document,
and comparing two valves with the same leak-tightness, the pressure
will therefore drop 2.7 times faster with the iValve-i250 than with an
equally leak-tight LRV1-175.
Definition:
The considerations detailed below result in the following permissible
leakage values (pressure drop within a test time of 5 minutes) for tests
with closed ball valve, with the temperature change as per Point 3 being
considered separately:
LRV175 20 bar
i250
25 bar *
DSV175
LRV350
Pressure drop within
VF-LRV350 15 bar
5 minutes
DSV700
i500
20 bar *
DSV350
LRV700 10 bar
* Because the iValve, when compared with the LRV, has a much smaller
pressurised volume between the installed valves and the ball valve, this
value can be increased.
We talk of leakage only when the pressure drops to 0 bar within 30 sec
onds after the ball valve is closed. At this point, actions at the lift control
valve are necessary, and the defective component must be found and
replaced.
300-S-9010595-EN-00/08.2017 3/7
Leak-testing
4/7 300-S-9010595-EN-00/08.2017
Leak-testing
Summary:
With a temperature change of 1 [K], the pressure in a closed system
changes by approximately 10 bar!
IMPORTANT!:
The mathematical relationship can be found in the appendix in Sec
tion 5.3.
The following shows the drop in pressure that will result from a leakage
of 1 cm³ from three different compressed volumes between the control
manifold block and the ball valve:
Compressed volume in dm³ or litres
1.5 1.0 0.5
Pressure drop with a
9 bar 14 bar 30 bar
leakage of 1 cm³
300-S-9010595-EN-00/08.2017 5/7
Leak-testing
5 Appendix
5.2 The following standards have been taken into account in this document
S EN 81-20:2014 Safety rules Part 20:
Passenger and goods passenger lifts
S EN 81-50:2015 Safety rules Part 50:
Examinations, calculations and tests of
components
6/7 300-S-9010595-EN-00/08.2017
Leak-testing
300-S-9010595-EN-00/08.2017 7/7