This document is an application filed in court by Mr. Mohan Sing, the accused, requesting to be discharged of charges filed against him under Section 124A of the IPC by the complainant. The application argues that there is no evidence to support the key ingredients of the charged offense, that witness statements did not support the allegations in the FIR or charge sheet, that the investigation was improper with no investigation at the scene of offense, and that the complainant filed the case with malicious intent and a delayed complaint. The application requests that the complaint be rejected and the accused be discharged from the false litigation.
This document is an application filed in court by Mr. Mohan Sing, the accused, requesting to be discharged of charges filed against him under Section 124A of the IPC by the complainant. The application argues that there is no evidence to support the key ingredients of the charged offense, that witness statements did not support the allegations in the FIR or charge sheet, that the investigation was improper with no investigation at the scene of offense, and that the complainant filed the case with malicious intent and a delayed complaint. The application requests that the complaint be rejected and the accused be discharged from the false litigation.
This document is an application filed in court by Mr. Mohan Sing, the accused, requesting to be discharged of charges filed against him under Section 124A of the IPC by the complainant. The application argues that there is no evidence to support the key ingredients of the charged offense, that witness statements did not support the allegations in the FIR or charge sheet, that the investigation was improper with no investigation at the scene of offense, and that the complainant filed the case with malicious intent and a delayed complaint. The application requests that the complaint be rejected and the accused be discharged from the false litigation.
This document is an application filed in court by Mr. Mohan Sing, the accused, requesting to be discharged of charges filed against him under Section 124A of the IPC by the complainant. The application argues that there is no evidence to support the key ingredients of the charged offense, that witness statements did not support the allegations in the FIR or charge sheet, that the investigation was improper with no investigation at the scene of offense, and that the complainant filed the case with malicious intent and a delayed complaint. The application requests that the complaint be rejected and the accused be discharged from the false litigation.
AT (give the name of the District Court where the bail
application format India is being filed)
IN THE MATTER OF
STATE ………………. Complainant
VS
Mr. Mohan Sing ………………… Opponent / Accused
APPLICATION U/S 239 OF CR.P.C. FOR
DISCHARGE THE ACCUSED OF PRESENT PETITION FILED BY THE COMPLAINANT UNDER SECTION 124 A OF I.P.C.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR
IT IS MOST RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF
THE APPLICANTS/ ACCUSEDS ABOVE NAMED
1. That the present petition under IPC 124 A, filed by the
complainant against the Accused is gross abuse of process of law. The present petition is filed to squeeze out money and harass the already distressed and exhausted Accused and making him to contest the false cases filed by the complainant to fulfil their ulterior motives.
2) It is submitted that, no evidence, whatsoever, is adduced in
support of and to attract the key ingredients of the section 124A IPC. All the allegations are bereft of details and thereby vague in nature. It is submitted that, none of the witness’s statements under Cr.P.C 161 supports Accused allegations in FIR. Even charge sheet allegations were not supported by the witnesses of the case.
NO INVESTIGATION AT THE SCENE OF OFFENCE
It is submitted that, investigation officer conducted improper
investigation and the investigation report does not comply with the sections of IPC and thereby the following consequences were resulted:
It is submitted that, the complainant failed to reveal the facts
and to collect the documentary evidences. Complainant supplied false information to this Hon’ble Court, through the Section 173(5) submissions.
INSTITUTING A LITIGATION WITH MALAFIDE
INTENTIONS
That the filing of the complaint, unleashed by Complainant
with an uncontained malicious vendetta, after an unexplained delay of around
5. Complaint:
That the accused being a cricketer himself had been to
watch the match at the stadium. During the on-going match Mr. mohan singh being a sportsperson screamed “Come on boys you can beat them, you guys are not less than anyone” cheering to the Sakistani Team. This statement caught ears not only in the stadium but also spread like a wild fire in the forest throughout the country. APPROACHING THE COURT WITH UNCLEAN HANDS
That the complainant has approached the court with unclean
hand to outraged the modesty of the accused. And all the allegation are false and untrue.
IMPROPER INVESTIGATION BY INVESTIGATING
OFFICER
It is submitted that, Fair investigation and Fair trial in a
criminal case have been read as part and parcel of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantees to every person, the fundamental right to life and personal liberty.
PRAYER
Hence, in view of afore stated legal grounds which are aptly
supported by facts and circumstances, culled entirely from documents submitted and relied on by prosecution itself in the instant case, it is crystal clear that there is no prima facie case made out, attracting section 124A of IPC and as such, it is most respectfully prayed to this Hon’ble Court that
1) The false petition/complaint of the complainant may kindly
be rejected in its entirety and the Accused be discharged from this false litigation implicating them in 2021, 2) Any other order/direction/guidelines may also kindly be passed against the Accused along with Head of his department/unit, as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper, according to the facts and circumstances of the present false case, in a direction to bring about meaningful, effective and improvement in their investigation procedures. 4) Any other order/direction may also kindly be passed against the Complaianat as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper, according to the facts and circumstances of the present false case considering the perjury committed u/s 340 Cr.P.C, by Complainat on Hon’ble Court. 5) Any other order/relief/direction may also kindly be passed in favor of the Accused as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper, according to the facts and circumstances of the present false case.