Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thong Ke Kinh Doanh
Thong Ke Kinh Doanh
Group 5:
Nguyễn Lâm Thùy An
Ngô Linh Chi
Phùng Đức Hiếu
Nguyễn Thành Long
Cung Bằng Linh
Chu Thị Nga
Phùng Yến Mai
Table of contents:
I. Introduction..........................................................................................2
II. Data analysis.......................................................................................3
1. Quantitative data.............................................................................3
2. Qualitative data...............................................................................9
2.1. Descriptive statistics.....................................................................9
2.2. Regression model........................................................................14
III. Appendix..........................................................................................19
1
I. Introduction:
In Western countries, where time is considered one of the most valuable assets of workers, the
concept of "part-time" was born quite early. Although it has only been around for less than a
decade in Vietnam, with the globalization trend, "part-time" has become a "hot" keyword.
Part-time jobs was born as an effective solution for job seekers to maximize their time and earn
more money. People work "part-time" for a variety of reasons, including the desire to gain
experience for future jobs, the desire to exchange and learn, the desire to constantly change the
working environment, and the desire to renew themselves every day. Therefore,, "part-time"
becomes a benefit, a real hobby, not just a way to make money.
In recent years, "part-time" job has begun to come to students more actively in recent years,
thanks to the outstanding development of the Internet. More than anyone else, "part-time" hits
hard on students, not only because they always need an income to add to their monthly supply,
but also because this class is always ready to work with enthusiasm and dynamism typical of
youth. Students are compared to "time kings", so it is also an opportunity for students
to use their free time to gain experience before entering a professional working environment.
Besides, if you do not have the right orientation about part-time jobs and future goals, but only
focus on immediate goals, forgetting the main task of studying, you cannot balance between
studying and doing part-time jobs will affect the academic results, health, lifestyle of
students. So, part-time jobs can be considered a "double-edged sword". The question is how do
students do part-time jobs to earn extra income, have the opportunity to be close to reality,
perfect their skills without being "alienated", negatively affecting their learning, practice
morality and lifestyle.
Our research team, as students , chose the topic "Effects of part-time job on college students'
lives in Hanoi" in the hopes of generating some ideas and orienting students in choosing part-
time jobs, proposing some solutions to help them balance study and part-time work, so that part-
time jobs truly support students' learning and self-improvement, as a preparation for them to
conquer the future.
2
II. Data analysis:
1. Quantitative data:
a. About personal information
- Graduated
Year 5
Male The
Year 4
2% 1% Year 1
9%
Education
39% 14%
Year 1
Year 2
Gender Year 3
Male Year 4
Female Year 3
Year 5
19% Graduated
Year 2
Female 56%
61%
Accommodation
Dorm Other
5% 1%
Stay with
relatives
4%
Home
Rented house
Stay with relatives
Dorm
Other
Home
Rented house 53%
37%
3
-The number of people working from home during the period of social distancing accounted for
52.9%, that led to the drop in pupils living in rented house or dorm with nearly 4%. The number
of people still renting houses is still there when Hanoi implements social distancing with
36.96%.
- From the above numbers, initially, the research team predicted that part-time jobs would be
considered to have less impact on learning because many jobs take place in the online
environment so students can reduce time and costs for students during pandemic period.
Self-understanding 60.4%
4
Negative affects on study
No aspect 9.8%
- On the other hand, drawbacks from working extra job could be seen clearly:
69.5% of the people told that their self-studying times was narrowed
Approximately 34-45% of attendance experienced problems such as:
No time for study
Less time on school
Unfocused on Studying
Can not keep it balance between studying and working.
Beside that, there were some serious issues occurred such as losing studying motivation
(15.2%). Otherwise, there were still some who didn’t get effected by it (9.8%)
No aspect 18.3%
5
It is considering to decide which is preferable between focusing on studying or
remaining balance between studying and working part-time after witnessing reports about health
according to the survey.
- Positive sides:
Over a half of the people claimed that money from working part-time upgraded their
living standard which leading to developing in health (52.4%) and mindset (41.5%)
Plenty benefits could be listed out such as: Stabilize their life, improving their awareness
in health caring and exercises… Those were listed by almost 32% people attended the
survey.
No aspect 18.9%
Stress 53.0%
- Negative sides:
53% of the survey attendance got stressful from works because of the competitive
working environment plus the lacking of time for self-caring.
Nearly 40% of people suffered from sleep disorder and health issues related to biological
clock.
27.4% people said that it damaged their physical and mental health
6
d. Positive/Negative effects of part-time jobs on relationship:
No aspect 3.7%
Expand the relationship 90.9%
Improve ourselves image 56.7%
Appreciate family members's hard working 67.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
- They saw that having a part-time job was the easiest way to expand their relationship
which could be seen easily with 90.9% people agreed. 56.7 % pupils agreed that having a job
while attending university brought them many benefits included improving their image in
people’s eyes, contributing more to society. 67.1% students listed out that they achieved lessons
about the value of money and working.
No aspect 27.4%
Less time for family and friends 60.4%
Get into bad relationships 15.9%
Lower the quality of old relationships 21.3%
Less time for other relationships 0.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
7
21.3% people said that having a part-time job lower the quality of old relationships,
otherwise, there were 27.4% of people was not effected by that.
Types of jobs
15.94%
23.19%
Service, barista
Salesman
Tutor
2.17% Shipper
Other
25.36%
33.33%
- 33.33% were tutors, nearly double the number of people in cafe service, bartender
(15.94%).Secondly, 25.36% of them chose to be salesman, communicators which are high
communication frequency, suit for people whom demands were improving their soft skills.
Additionally, shipper accounted 2.17% of the attender. Finally, 23.19% of the people left had
others job which were almost all of them below 1%. Those illustrated the diversity in
job choosing of pupils on various fields with different level of affects to their life.
8
2. Qualitative data:
2.1. Descriptive statistics
AVERAGE ALLOWANCE
Valid 138
N
Missing 0
Mean 2.99
Median 3.00
Mode 3
Std. Deviation 1.964
Variance 3.856
Skewness 1.911
Std. Error of Skewness .206
Range 15
Sum 412
25 2.00
Percentiles 50 3.00
75 4.00
- It can be seen that the average monthly allowance of a student's family is about 2 million 990
thousand VND and the standard deviation is about 1 million 964 thousand VND
- The number of people supported over 10 million is quite small, mainly in the range of 1 to 5
million .
GPA
Valid 138
N
Missing 0
Mean 3.0186
Median 3.1000
Mode 3.00
Std. Deviation .90407
Variance .817
Skewness -.977
Std. Error of Skewness .206
Range 7.50
9
Sum 416.57
25 2.9000
Percentiles 50 3.1000
75 3.5000
- The average GPA of the students is about 3.0 - Standard deviation is 0.9 - The majority of
students achieve good and excellent degrees
75 1.00
AVER_STUDYTIME
Valid 138
N
Missing 0
Mean 2.6038
Median 2.0000
Mode 2.00
Std. Deviation 1.36345
10
Variance 1.859
Skewness .837
Std. Error of Skewness .206
Range 8.00
Sum 359.33
25 2.0000
Percentiles 50 2.0000
75 3.0000
- On average, each person spends about 2 hours on self-study.
- Most students, even if they have part-time jobs, they still spend 1 to 4 hours on self-study,
which can also explain that even if they work, it doesn't affect their studies and their average
GPA that from good level or higher.
AVER_TIME
Valid 138
N
Missing 0
Mean 4.2475
Median 4.0000
Mode 2.00a
Std. Deviation 2.17953
Variance 4.750
Skewness 1.027
Std. Error of Skewness .206
Range 11.00
Sum 586.15
25 2.1875
Percentiles 50 4.0000
75 5.0000
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest
value is shown
- On average, students go to work about 4 hours a day
- But based on the chart, the number of people working about 2 hours a day is the highest
- The number of students working more than 6 hours a day is quite small
- Most students work part time, so their working hours are not too many, it does not affect their
studies.
STATISTICS
Affect_study Affect_health Affect_relationship
N Valid 138 138 138
11
Missing 0 0 0
Mean 3.54 3.20 3.70
Median 4.00 3.00 4.00
Mode 4 3 3
Std. Deviation .736 .818 .739
Variance .542 .669 .546
Skewness -.152 .516 .318
Std. Error of Skewness .206 .206 .206
Range 4 3 3
Sum 489 441 511
25 3.00 3.00 3.00
Percentiles 50 4.00 3.00 4.00
75 4.00 4.00 4.00
12
- Overall, the extent that work affects schooling, health, or relationships on average is
rated positively.
- It can also be seen that part-time jobs bring many benefits to students
- Satisfaction level is the majority at level 3 and level 4, showing a very positive influence on
relationships.
- Regarding the effect on health, the majority of people at level 3 are positive, but the number of
people who choose level 2 is at the highest effect on health out of the 3 tables. This may be the
case for people who work 2 or more jobs because having to work too much is also very bad for
their health.
- As for the influence on learning, most of them are very positive influences at level 3 and level
4, accounting for 80% of the survey. Show that part-time jobs help them study better, having a
place to practice lessons in class helps them understand the lesson and study better. Prove that
their GPA is mostly from pretty good to majority.
- In 3 graphs, it can be seen that going to work has a positive influence on learning and
relationships mainly. (80% are rated at 3 and 4) are highly appreciated by the students and the
efficiency of going to work.
First regression
a
Variables Entered / Removed
Variables Variables
Model Method
Entered Removed
- Dependent Variable: GPA => Average GPA during the period in university.
- Independent Variables:
· work => Average working time per day.
· study => Average self-study time per day.
b
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Square Estimate
1 .030a .001 -.014 .91034
a. Predictors: (Constant), Aver_time, Aver_studytime
13
b. Dependent Variable: Aver_GPA
- Null hypothesis:
H0: β 1= β 2 = 0
H1: At least 1 value of β 2 and β 2 not equal 0
Sig = 0.943 > α=0.05 => not reject H0, there’s not enough evidence to prove that at least
1 value of β 1 and β 2 not equal 0.
a
Coefficients
14
95.0%
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Model t Sig. Confidence
Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
Interval for B
Lower Upper
B Std.Error Beta Tolerance VIF
bound bound
(Constant) 3.012 .225 13.371 .000 2.566 3.457
Aver_study .015 .057 .023 .268 .789 -.098 .128 1.000 1.000
time -.008 .036 -.019 -.218 .828 -.078 .063 1.000 1.000
Aver_time
On average:
If student doesn’t have a job and self-study, his/her average GPA will be 3.012.
When student increases his/her self-study time by 1 hour, his/her average GPA increases
by 0.15
When student increases his/her working time by 1 hour, his/her average GPA decreases
by 0.008
+) T-test for β 1:
H0: β 1= 0
H1: β 1 ≠ 0
Because sig β 1= 0.789 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 1 might be equal 0 and the average
self-study time might make no sense to Average GPA.
+) T-test for β 2
H0: β 2 = 0
H1: β 2 ≠ 0
15
Because sig β 2 = 0.828 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 2 might be equal 0 and the average
working time might make no sense to Average GPA.
Comment: At first, we expected that there was a positive correlation between self-study time,
working time and GPA. If what we expected has enough evidence to be proved that it is right,
students can look at our research and make most suitable decisions for them. However, as the
results which are estimated and explained by those tables above, there’s nothing at all. All the
estimated results are insignificant that means GPA of a student is almost unaffected by his/her
self-study time or the amount of time he/she goes to work
Second regression:
Variables Entered / Removeda
Variables Variables
Model Method
Entered Removed
allowance
1 b Enter
study
c. Dependent Variable: work
d. All requested variables entered
- Independent Variables:
𝑴𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒍 𝒔𝒖𝒎𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒚𝒃
Model R R Square Adjusted R STD. Error of
Square the Estimate
1 .039a .002 −.013 2.19390
The value of adjusted R-square is too small (-0.013), so this model is not so good.
16
- The value of Std.Error of the Estimate is 2.19390 => this value is quite big => This seems not a
good regression
a
ANOVA
Model Sum of squares df Mean square F Sig.
1 Regression 1.012 2 .506 .105 .900
b
- Null hypothesis:
H0: β 1 = β 2 = 0
H1: At least 1 value of β 1 and β 2 not equal 0
Sig = 0.9 > α=0.05 => not reject H0, there’s not enough evidence to prove that at least 1
value of β1 and β2 not equal 0.
Coefficients a
95.0%
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Model t Sig. Confidence
Coefficients Coefficients Statistics
Interval for B
Lower Upper
B Std.Error Beta Tolerance VIF
bound bound
(Constant) 4.101 .481 8.518 .000 3.149 5.053
1 study .007 .138 .004 .049 .961 -.266 .279 .996 1.004
allowance .043 .096 .039 .452 .652 -.146 .232 .996 1.004
On average:
17
If student doesn’t spend time on self-study and has no allowance, his/her average
working will be 4.101.
When student increases his/her average self-study time per day by 1 hour, his/her average
working time per day increases by 0.007 hour.
When student’s average monthly allowance is increased by VND 1 million, his/her
average working time per day increases by 0.043 hour.
- Absolute value of standardized coefficients of β 1 (0.004) is lower than that of β 2 (0.039), so the
average self-study time per day has less effect on the average working time per day than the
average monthly allowance.
+) T-test for β 1:
H0: β 1= 0
H1: β 1 ≠ 0
Because sig β 1 = 0.961 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 1 might be equal 0 and the average
self-study time per day might make no sense to Average working time per day.
+) T-test for β 2
H0: β 2 = 0
H1: β 2 ≠ 0
Because sig β 2 = 0.652 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 2 might be equal 0 and the average
monthly allowance might make no sense to Average working time per day.
Comment: On the other hand, in the second model, average working time per day is expected to
decrease when both average monthly allowance and average self-study time per day increase.
However, same conclusion happened that there was no correlation among them. From our
perspective, this faulty maybe due to lack of proper theories when developing variables
III. Appendix
Questionnaire:
Thông tin cá nhân
1) Bạn đã/đang đi làm thêm hay chưa?
Đã/ Đang đi làm (Tiếp tục phỏng vấn)
Chưa từng đi làm (Kết thúc phỏng vấn)
2) Giới tính của bạn là?
Nam
Nữ
3) Bạn là sinh viên năm mấy?
18
Năm 1
Năm 2
Năm 3
Năm 4
4) Hiện tại bạn đang ở đâu?
Nhà riêng
Nhà thuê
Nhà ở nhờ
Kí túc xá
Khác
5) Trung bình một tháng bạn được chu cấp bao nhiêu? (đơn vị: triệu đồng)
6) GPA trung bình các kì đã học của bạn là bao nhiểu? (Tính theo hệ số 4)
Vui lòng cho biết ảnh hưởng của việc đi làm thêm đến cuộc sống của bạn
Việc học tập
7.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TÍCH
CỰC đến việc học của bạn ở những khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)
Không có khía cạnh nào
Nâng cao khả năng giao tiếp
Cải thiện kĩ năng quản lí thời gian
Trang bị thêm kiến thức xã hội liên quan đến chuyên ngành đã học
Tạo cơ hội thực hành các kiến thức trên lớp
Tìm ra điểm mạnh của bản thân
Giúp tiếp thu bài học trên lớp tốt hơn (thông qua môi trường làm việc thực tế)
Khác
7.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TIÊU
CỰC đến việc học của bạn ở những khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)
Không có khía cạnh nào
Giảm thời gian học tập trên lớp
Giảm thời gian tự học
Không có thời gian học bài
Phân tâm trong việc học
Không thể cân đối giữa việc học và việc làm
Mất động lực học tập
Khác
7.3) Thời gian trung bình dành cho thời gian tự học của bạn mỗi ngày? (đơn vị: giờ)
7.4) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm có ảnh hưởng như nào tới việc học của bạn? (cho điểm theo mức
độ ảnh hưởng với 1 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tiêu cực đến 5 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tích cực)
Sức khỏe
8.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TÍCH CỰC đến sức khỏe của bạn ở những khía cạnh
nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)
19
Nâng cao sức khỏe thể chất
Nâng cao sức khỏe tinh thần
Nâng cao nhận thức bảo vệ sức khỏe
Cải thiện điều kiện tài chính dành cho sức khỏe
Tuân thủ giờ giấc làm việc giúp cân bằng đồng hồ sinh học
Khác
8.2) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TIÊU CỰC đến sức khỏe của bạn ở những khía cạnh
nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)
8.3) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm có ảnh hưởng như nào tới sức khỏe của bạn? (cho điểm theo
mức độ ảnh hưởng với 1 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tiêu cực đến 5 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tích cực)
9.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TÍCH CỰC đến các mối quan hệ của bạn ở những
khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)
9.2) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TIÊU CỰC đến các mối quan hệ của bạn ở những
khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)
20
9.3)Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm có ảnh hưởng như nào tới các mối quan hệ của bạn? (cho điểm
theo mức độ ảnh hưởng với 1 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tiêu cực đến 5 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tích
cực)
12) Thời gian bạn làm việc trung bình trong một ngày? (đơn vị: giờ)
21