Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

NATIONAL ECONOMIC UNIVERSITY 

FALCULTY OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT  


 
 

Subject: Business Statistics

Topic: Effects of part-time job on college


students’ lives in Hanoi 
 

Group 5:  
Nguyễn Lâm Thùy An 
Ngô Linh Chi 
Phùng Đức Hiếu 
Nguyễn Thành Long 
Cung Bằng Linh 
Chu Thị Nga  
Phùng Yến Mai     
Table of contents: 
I. Introduction..........................................................................................2
II. Data analysis.......................................................................................3
1. Quantitative data.............................................................................3
2. Qualitative data...............................................................................9
2.1. Descriptive statistics.....................................................................9
2.2. Regression model........................................................................14
III. Appendix..........................................................................................19
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

1
I. Introduction: 
 In Western countries, where time is considered one of the most valuable assets of workers, the
concept of "part-time" was born quite early. Although it has only been around for less than a
decade in Vietnam, with the globalization trend, "part-time" has become a "hot" keyword. 

 Part-time jobs was born as an effective solution for job seekers to maximize their time and earn
more money. People work "part-time" for a variety of reasons, including the desire to gain
experience for future jobs, the desire to exchange and learn, the desire to constantly change the
working environment, and the desire to renew themselves every day. Therefore,, "part-time"
becomes a benefit, a real hobby, not just a way to make money. 

 In recent years, "part-time" job has begun to come to students more actively in recent years,
thanks to the outstanding development of the Internet. More than anyone else, "part-time" hits
hard on students, not only because they always need an income to add to their monthly supply,
but also because this class is always ready to work with enthusiasm and dynamism typical of
youth. Students are compared to "time kings", so it is also an opportunity for students
to use their free time to gain experience before entering a professional working environment. 

 Besides, if you do not have the right orientation about part-time jobs and future goals, but only
focus on immediate goals, forgetting the main task of studying, you cannot balance between
studying and doing part-time jobs will affect the academic results, health,  lifestyle of
students. So, part-time jobs can be considered a "double-edged sword". The question is how do
students do part-time jobs to earn extra income, have the opportunity to be close to reality,
perfect their skills without being "alienated", negatively affecting their learning, practice
morality and lifestyle. 

Our research team, as students , chose the topic "Effects of part-time job on college students'
lives in Hanoi" in the hopes of generating some ideas and orienting students in choosing part-
time jobs, proposing some solutions to help them balance study and part-time work, so that part-
time jobs truly support students' learning and self-improvement, as a preparation for them to
conquer the future. 

2
II. Data analysis: 
1. Quantitative data: 
a. About personal information 

- Graduated
Year 5
Male The
Year 4
2% 1% Year 1
9%
Education
39% 14%
Year 1
Year 2
Gender Year 3
Male Year 4
Female Year 3
Year 5
19% Graduated

Year 2
Female 56%
61%

survey showed that half of the people were


sophomore with 55.8%. Following that were senior and junior with approximately 15%. The
number of freshman accounted a small number of people in the survey with 8.696%. Lastly,
the graduates proportion was 2.147%. 

Accommodation

Dorm Other
5% 1%
Stay with
relatives
4%

Home
Rented house
Stay with relatives
Dorm
Other
Home
Rented house 53%
37%

3
-The number of people working from home during the period of social distancing accounted for
52.9%, that led to the drop in pupils living in rented house or dorm with nearly 4%. The number
of people still renting houses is still there when Hanoi implements social distancing with
36.96%.  

- From the above numbers, initially, the research team predicted that part-time jobs would be
considered to have less impact on learning because many jobs take place in the online
environment so students can reduce time and costs for students during pandemic period.  

 b. Positive/Negative effects of part-time jobs on studying: 

Positive affects to study


No aspect 2.4%

Communication skill development 89.6%

Time-management skill 75.6%

Social awareness raising 58.5%

Experience from reality situations 33.5%

Self-understanding 60.4%

Knowledge acquisition improvement 19.5%

If the job related to the speacialization 0.6%

Be better off 0.6%

0% 50% 100% 150%

Positive affects to study results


- The majority of people attended the survey acknowledged that having a part-time job gave
them some remarkable benefits both in hard and soft skills: 
 Communication skill development: 89.6% 
 Time-management skill: 75.6% 
 Self-understanding: 60.4% 
 Social awareness raising: 58.5% 
- Beside that, there were some reports showed that working part-time job effected the efficiency
of studying at school: 
 Knowledge acquisition improvement: 19.5% 
 Experiences from reality situations: 33.5% 
 From all of the above, working a part-time job while attending university brought pupils
some significant experiences in life in order to improve their skills to train their ability in
handling situations. 

4
Negative affects on study
No aspect 9.8%

Less time on school 35.4%

No self-study time 69.5%

No time for study 34.1%

Unfocused on studying 44.5%

Can't keep it balance between studying and working 34.1%

Lose motivation to study 15.2%

0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 125%

Negative affects on study

- On the other hand, drawbacks from working extra job could be seen clearly: 
 69.5% of the people told that their self-studying times was narrowed 
 Approximately 34-45% of attendance experienced problems such as: 
 No time for study
 Less time on school 
 Unfocused on Studying 
 Can not keep it balance between studying and working. 
 Beside that, there were some serious issues occurred such as losing studying motivation
(15.2%). Otherwise, there were still some who didn’t get effected by it (9.8%) 

c. Positive/Negative effects of part-time jobs on health:  

Positive effects on health

No aspect 18.3%

Improving physical health 31.1%

Improving mental health 41.5%

Rasing awareness about health protection 31.1%

Improving financial conditions for health 52.4%

Balancing biological clock 34.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Positive effects on health

5
It is considering to decide which is preferable between focusing on studying or
remaining balance between studying and working part-time after witnessing reports about health
according to the survey. 

- Positive sides: 

 Over a half of the people claimed that money from working part-time upgraded their
living standard which leading to developing in health (52.4%) and mindset (41.5%) 

 Plenty benefits could be listed out such as: Stabilize their life, improving their awareness
in health caring and exercises… Those were listed by almost 32% people attended the
survey. 

Negative effects on health

No aspect 18.9%

Sleep disorders 43.3%

Stress 53.0%

Damaging physical health 27.4%

Biological clock disorder 37.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Negative effects on health

- Negative sides: 

 53% of the survey attendance got stressful from works because of the competitive
working environment plus the lacking of time for self-caring. 

 Nearly 40% of people suffered from sleep disorder and health issues related to biological
clock. 

 27.4% people said that it damaged their physical  and mental health 

6
d. Positive/Negative effects of part-time jobs on relationship: 

Positive effects on relationship

No aspect 3.7%
Expand the relationship 90.9%
Improve ourselves image 56.7%
Appreciate family members's hard working 67.1%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Positive effects on relationship

- They saw that having a part-time job was the easiest way to expand their relationship
which could be seen easily with 90.9% people agreed. 56.7 % pupils agreed that having a job
while attending university brought them many benefits included improving their image in
people’s eyes, contributing more to society. 67.1% students listed out that they achieved lessons
about the value of money and working. 

Negative effects on relationship

No aspect 27.4%
Less time for family and friends 60.4%
Get into bad relationships 15.9%
Lower the quality of old relationships 21.3%
Less time for other relationships 0.6%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Negative effects on relationship

Part-time works still had some sustainable drawbacks: 


 Shift working consumes lots of times, especially after office hours. The research depicted
that 60.4% of the people got less time for their family and friends and 15.9% people claimed
that they could get into bad relationships. 

7
 21.3% people said that having a part-time job lower the quality of old relationships,
otherwise, there were 27.4% of people was not effected by that.  

Types of jobs
15.94%
23.19%

Service, barista
Salesman
Tutor
2.17% Shipper
Other
25.36%

33.33%

- 33.33% were tutors, nearly double the number of people in cafe service, bartender
(15.94%).Secondly, 25.36% of them chose to be salesman, communicators which are high
communication  frequency, suit for people whom demands were improving their soft skills.
Additionally, shipper accounted 2.17% of the attender. Finally, 23.19% of the people left had
others job which were almost all of them below 1%. Those illustrated the diversity in
job choosing of pupils on various fields with different level of affects to their life. 

8
2. Qualitative data: 
2.1. Descriptive statistics

AVERAGE ALLOWANCE

Valid 138
N
Missing 0
Mean 2.99
Median 3.00
Mode 3
Std. Deviation 1.964
Variance 3.856
Skewness 1.911
Std. Error of Skewness .206
Range 15
Sum 412
25 2.00

Percentiles 50 3.00

75 4.00

- It can be seen that the average monthly allowance of a student's family is about 2 million 990
thousand VND and the standard deviation is about 1 million 964 thousand VND  
- The number of people supported over 10 million is quite small, mainly in the range of 1 to 5
million .

  GPA

Valid 138
N
Missing 0
Mean 3.0186
Median 3.1000
Mode 3.00
Std. Deviation .90407
Variance .817
Skewness -.977
Std. Error of Skewness .206
Range 7.50

9
Sum 416.57
25 2.9000

Percentiles 50 3.1000

75 3.5000

 - The average GPA of the students is about 3.0  - Standard deviation is 0.9  - The majority of
students achieve good and excellent degrees 

NUMBER OF THE CURRENT JOB 


Valid  110 

Missing  28 
Mean  1.05 
Median  1.00 
Mode  1 
Std. Deviation  .572 
Variance  .327 
Skewness  .007 
Std. Error of Skewness  .230 
Range  2 
Sum  116 
25  1.00 

Percentiles  50  1.00 

75  1.00 

- On average, about 80 people in the survey doing only one job  


- The number of people doing 2 jobs at the same time is less, just above 10 people  
- And only 5 people who are doing 3 jobs at the
same time 

AVER_STUDYTIME 
 
Valid  138 

Missing  0 
Mean  2.6038 
Median  2.0000 
Mode  2.00 
Std. Deviation  1.36345 

10
Variance  1.859 
Skewness  .837 
Std. Error of Skewness  .206 
Range  8.00 
Sum  359.33 
25  2.0000 
Percentiles  50  2.0000 
75  3.0000 
 
- On average, each person spends about 2 hours on self-study. 
- Most students, even if they have part-time jobs, they still spend 1 to 4 hours on self-study,
which can also explain that even if they work, it doesn't affect their studies and their average
GPA that from good level or higher. 

AVER_TIME 
Valid  138 

Missing  0 
Mean  4.2475 
Median  4.0000 
Mode  2.00a 
Std. Deviation  2.17953 
Variance  4.750 
Skewness  1.027 
Std. Error of Skewness  .206 
Range  11.00 
Sum  586.15 
25  2.1875 
Percentiles  50  4.0000 
75  5.0000 
a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest
value is shown 
 
 
- On average, students go to work about 4 hours a day  
- But based on the chart, the number of people working about 2 hours a day is the highest  
- The number of students working more than 6 hours a day is quite small  
- Most students work part time, so their working hours are not too many, it does not affect their
studies. 

STATISTICS 
  Affect_study  Affect_health  Affect_relationship 
N  Valid  138  138  138 

11
Missing  0  0  0 
Mean  3.54  3.20  3.70 
Median  4.00  3.00  4.00 
Mode  4  3  3 
Std. Deviation  .736  .818  .739 
Variance  .542  .669  .546 
Skewness  -.152  .516  .318 
Std. Error of Skewness  .206  .206  .206 
Range  4  3  3 
Sum  489  441  511 
25  3.00  3.00  3.00 
Percentiles  50  4.00  3.00  4.00 
75  4.00  4.00  4.00 
 
 
 

12
- Overall, the extent that work affects schooling, health, or relationships on average is
rated positively.  
- It can also be seen that part-time jobs bring many benefits to students  
- Satisfaction level is the majority at level 3 and level 4, showing a very positive influence on
relationships. 
- Regarding the effect on health, the majority of people at level 3 are positive, but the number of
people who choose level 2 is at the highest effect on health out of the 3 tables. This may be the
case for people who work 2 or more jobs because having to work too much is also very bad for
their health. 
- As for the influence on learning, most of them are very positive influences at level 3 and level
4, accounting for 80% of the survey. Show that part-time jobs help them study better, having a
place to practice lessons in class helps them understand the lesson and study better. Prove that
their GPA is mostly from pretty good to majority. 
- In 3 graphs, it can be seen that going to work has a positive influence on learning and
relationships mainly. (80% are rated at 3 and 4) are highly appreciated by the students and the
efficiency of going to work. 

2.2. Regression model 

 First regression
a
Variables Entered / Removed
Variables  Variables 
Model      Method 
Entered  Removed 

1  work, studyb   Enter 


a. Dependent Variable: GPA 
b. All requested variables entered 

- Dependent Variable: GPA => Average GPA during the period in university. 
- Independent Variables: 
· work => Average working time per day. 
· study => Average self-study time per day. 
 
b
Model Summary
 
Model  R  R Square  Adjusted R  Std. Error of the
Square  Estimate 
1   .030a .001  -.014   .91034
a. Predictors: (Constant), Aver_time, Aver_studytime 

13
b. Dependent Variable: Aver_GPA 

- R-square=0.001: Coefficient of determination. Because we are running multi


linear regression so R-square have some limitations. 
 Using Adjusted R-square 
Residual ∑ of squares
R−square=
Total ∑ of squares
- R-square*adjustment factor = Adjusted R-square = -0.014 
The value of adjusted R-square is too small, so this model is not so good because it seems that
the dependent variable mostly can not explained by 2 independent variables.
- The value of Std.Error of the Estimate is 0.91034  This value is not big  
 This might be a good regression. 
 
a
ANOVA  
Model  Sum of squares  df  Mean square  F  Sig. 
b
1              Regression  .098  2  .049  .059  .943
                Residual  111.877  135  .829   
                Total  111.975  137 
a. Dependent Variable: GPA 
b. Predictors: (Constant), work, study
 

- Regression sum of square: Total variation caused by regression. 

- Residual sum of square: Total variation causes by residual. 

- Df: degree of freedom

- Mean square = 𝑆𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑓

- Linear regression model: GPA=β 0 + β 1 study+ β 2 work

- Null hypothesis:

 H0: β 1= β 2 = 0
 H1: At least 1 value of β 2 and β 2 not equal 0

Test for hypothesis by using sig (p-value)

Sig = 0.943 > α=0.05 => not reject H0, there’s not enough evidence to prove that at least
1 value of β 1 and β 2 not equal 0.

a
Coefficients

14
95.0%
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Model  t  Sig.  Confidence
Coefficients  Coefficients  Statistics 
Interval for B 
Lower Upper
  B  Std.Error  Beta      Tolerance  VIF 
bound  bound 
(Constant)   3.012  .225    13.371  .000  2.566  3.457     
Aver_study .015  .057  .023  .268  .789  -.098  .128  1.000  1.000 
time  -.008  .036  -.019  -.218  .828  -.078  .063  1.000  1.000 
Aver_time 

a. Dependent Variable: Aver_GPA 

- Linear regression: GPA = 3.012 + 0.15study – 0.008work

On average:

 If student doesn’t have a job and self-study, his/her average GPA will be 3.012.
 When student increases his/her self-study time by 1 hour, his/her average GPA increases
by 0.15
 When student increases his/her working time by 1 hour, his/her average GPA decreases
by 0.008

- Absolute value of standardized coefficients of β 1 (0.023) is higher than that of β 2 (0.019), so


the average self-study time has more effect on the average GPA than the average working time.

- Test for hypothesis:

+) T-test for β 1:

 H0: β 1= 0
 H1: β 1 ≠ 0

Because sig β 1= 0.789 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 1 might be equal 0 and the average
self-study time might make no sense to Average GPA.

+) T-test for β 2

 H0: β 2 = 0
 H1: β 2 ≠ 0

15
Because sig β 2 = 0.828 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 2 might be equal 0 and the average
working time might make no sense to Average GPA.

Comment: At first, we expected that there was a positive correlation between self-study time,
working time and GPA. If what we expected has enough evidence to be proved that it is right,
students can look at our research and make most suitable decisions for them. However, as the
results which are estimated and explained by those tables above, there’s nothing at all. All the
estimated results are insignificant that means GPA of a student is almost unaffected by his/her
self-study time or the amount of time he/she goes to work

 Second regression: 
Variables Entered / Removeda
 
Variables  Variables 
Model      Method 
Entered  Removed 
allowance   
 
1  b Enter 
study

c. Dependent Variable: work 
d. All requested variables entered 

- Dependent Variable: work => Average working time per day.

- Independent Variables:

 allowance => Average monthly allowance


 study => Average self-study time per day.

 
𝑴𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒍 𝒔𝒖𝒎𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒚𝒃
 
Model  R  R Square  Adjusted R  STD. Error of
Square  the Estimate 
1  .039a .002 −.013 2.19390
     

a. Predictors: (Constant), allowance, study


b. Dependent Variable: work

The value of adjusted R-square is too small (-0.013), so this model is not so good.

16
- The value of Std.Error of the Estimate is 2.19390 => this value is quite big => This seems not a
good regression

a
ANOVA
 
Model  Sum of squares  df  Mean square  F  Sig. 
1              Regression  1.012  2  .506  .105  .900  
b

                Residual  649.784  135  4.813 


                Total  650.797  137 

a. Dependent Variable: work


b. Predictors: (Constant), allowance, study

- Linear regression model: work = β0 + β1study + β 2allowance

- Null hypothesis:

 H0: β 1 = β 2 = 0
 H1: At least 1 value of β 1 and β 2 not equal 0

Test for hypothesis by using sig (p-value)

Sig = 0.9 > α=0.05 => not reject H0, there’s not enough evidence to prove that at least 1
value of β1 and β2 not equal 0.

Coefficients a

95.0%
Unstandardized Standardized Collinearity
Model  t  Sig.  Confidence
Coefficients  Coefficients  Statistics 
Interval for B 
Lower Upper
  B  Std.Error  Beta      Tolerance  VIF 
bound  bound 
   (Constant)   4.101  .481    8.518  .000  3.149  5.053     
1 study  .007  .138  .004  .049  .961  -.266  .279  .996  1.004 
   allowance  .043  .096  .039  .452  .652  -.146  .232  .996  1.004 

a. Dependent Variable: work

- Linear regression: work = 4.101 + 0.007study + 0.043allowance

On average:

17
 If student doesn’t spend time on self-study and has no allowance, his/her average
working will be 4.101.
 When student increases his/her average self-study time per day by 1 hour, his/her average
working time per day increases by 0.007 hour.
 When student’s average monthly allowance is increased by VND 1 million, his/her
average working time per day increases by 0.043 hour.

- Absolute value of standardized coefficients of β 1 (0.004) is lower than that of β 2 (0.039), so the
average self-study time per day has less effect on the average working time per day than the
average monthly allowance.

- Test for hypothesis:

+) T-test for β 1:

 H0: β 1= 0
 H1: β 1 ≠ 0

Because sig β 1 = 0.961 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 1 might be equal 0 and the average
self-study time per day might make no sense to Average working time per day.

+) T-test for β 2

 H0: β 2 = 0
 H1: β 2 ≠ 0

Because sig β 2 = 0.652 > α=0.05 => not reject H0 => β 2 might be equal 0 and the average
monthly allowance might make no sense to Average working time per day.

Comment: On the other hand, in the second model, average working time per day is expected to
decrease when both average monthly allowance and average self-study time per day increase.
However, same conclusion happened that there was no correlation among them. From our
perspective, this faulty maybe due to lack of proper theories when developing variables

III. Appendix 
 Questionnaire: 
 Thông tin cá nhân 
1) Bạn đã/đang đi làm thêm hay chưa? 
 Đã/ Đang đi làm (Tiếp tục phỏng vấn) 
 Chưa từng đi làm (Kết thúc phỏng vấn) 
2) Giới tính của bạn là? 
 Nam 
 Nữ 
3) Bạn là sinh viên năm mấy? 

18
 Năm 1 
 Năm 2 
 Năm 3 
 Năm 4 
4) Hiện tại bạn đang ở đâu? 
 Nhà riêng 
 Nhà thuê 
 Nhà ở nhờ 
 Kí túc xá 
 Khác 
5) Trung bình một tháng bạn được chu cấp bao nhiêu? (đơn vị: triệu đồng) 
6) GPA trung bình các kì đã học của bạn là bao nhiểu? (Tính theo hệ số 4) 
 Vui lòng cho biết ảnh hưởng của việc đi làm thêm đến cuộc sống của bạn 
Việc học tập 
7.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TÍCH
CỰC đến việc học của bạn ở những khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án) 
 Không có khía cạnh nào 
 Nâng cao khả năng giao tiếp 
 Cải thiện kĩ năng quản lí thời gian 
 Trang bị thêm kiến thức xã hội liên quan đến chuyên ngành đã học 
 Tạo cơ hội thực hành các kiến thức trên lớp
 Tìm ra điểm mạnh của bản thân
 Giúp tiếp thu bài học trên lớp tốt hơn (thông qua môi trường làm việc thực tế)
 Khác
7.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TIÊU
CỰC đến việc học của bạn ở những khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án) 
 Không có khía cạnh nào
 Giảm thời gian học tập trên lớp
 Giảm thời gian tự học
 Không có thời gian học bài
 Phân tâm trong việc học
 Không thể cân đối giữa việc học và việc làm
 Mất động lực học tập
 Khác
7.3) Thời gian trung bình dành cho thời gian tự học của bạn mỗi ngày? (đơn vị: giờ)
7.4) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm có ảnh hưởng như nào tới việc học của bạn? (cho điểm theo mức
độ ảnh hưởng với 1 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tiêu cực đến 5 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tích cực)

Sức khỏe

8.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TÍCH CỰC đến sức khỏe của bạn ở những khía cạnh
nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)

 Không có khía cạnh nào

19
 Nâng cao sức khỏe thể chất
 Nâng cao sức khỏe tinh thần
 Nâng cao nhận thức bảo vệ sức khỏe
 Cải thiện điều kiện tài chính dành cho sức khỏe
 Tuân thủ giờ giấc làm việc giúp cân bằng đồng hồ sinh học
 Khác

8.2) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TIÊU CỰC đến sức khỏe của bạn ở những khía cạnh
nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)

 Không có khía cạnh nào


 Gây rối loạn giấc ngủ (thiếu ngủ, khó ngủ, ...)
 Gây stress
 Gây tổn hại sức khỏe thể chất (giảm cân, đau dạ dày, ...)
 Gây rối loạn đồng hồ sinh học
 Khác

8.3) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm có ảnh hưởng như nào tới sức khỏe của bạn? (cho điểm theo
mức độ ảnh hưởng với 1 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tiêu cực đến 5 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tích cực)

Các mối quan hệ gia đình và xã hội

9.1) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TÍCH CỰC đến các mối quan hệ của bạn ở những
khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)

 Không có khía cạnh nào


 Mở rộng các mối quan hệ xã hội
 Nâng cao hình ảnh bản thân trong mắt gia đình và bạn bè
 Trân trọng công sức của các thành viên trong gia đình
 Khác

9.2) Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm ảnh hưởng TIÊU CỰC đến các mối quan hệ của bạn ở những
khía cạnh nào? (có thể chọn nhiều phương án)

 Không có khía cạnh nào


 Giảm thời gian dành cho gia đình và bạn bè
 Kết giao với các mối quan hệ xấu
 Giảm chất lượng các mối quan hệ đã có
 Khác

20
9.3)Theo bạn, việc đi làm thêm có ảnh hưởng như nào tới các mối quan hệ của bạn? (cho điểm
theo mức độ ảnh hưởng với 1 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tiêu cực đến 5 là ảnh hưởng hoàn toàn tích
cực)

Một số thông tin chung

10) Số công việc bạn đang làm hiện tại?

11) Bạn đã/ đang làm công việc gì?

 Nhân viên pha chế - phục vụ


 Nhân viên bán hang
 Gia sư
 Shipper
 Xe ôm công nghệ
 Khác

12) Thời gian bạn làm việc trung bình trong một ngày? (đơn vị: giờ)

21

You might also like