Darielle Ryan P. Pefiarroyo BSN2B Use the following listed chest deceleration measurements (in g, where g is the force of gravity) from samples of small, midsize and large cars. Assume that we plan to use a 0.05 significance level to test the claim that the different size categories have the same mean chest deceleration in the standard crash test. Small Midsize Large 44 36 32 39 53 45 7 43 a“ 54 42 38 39 52 37 44 49 42 ANSWER: It has been asked to examine the assertion that in a conventional crash test, the different size categories had the same mean chest deceleration using the information provided. The one-way analysis of variance is the appropriate test to see if the different size groups in the conventional crash test have the same mean chest deceleration. Hypothesis: HO: 1=p2=p3=0Thatis, the different size categories have the same mean chest deceleration in the standard crash test. H1: At least one size category have different mean chest deceleration in the standard crash test. R code and output: The R code and output for one way analysis of variance is given below: sanova one_way=acv (deceleration-Group, data) > summary (one_way) DE Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Group 2 142.8 (71.41 2.128 0.184 Residuals 15 503.5 33.56 Conclusion: From the R output, it can be observed that the p-value (=0.154) is greater than 0.05 significance level. Thus, the null hypothesis has failed to be rejected and can be concluded that the different size categories have the same mean chest deceleration in the standard crash test.