Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Storage Quality of Powdered Cyanobacterium - Spirulina Platensis
Storage Quality of Powdered Cyanobacterium - Spirulina Platensis
Storage Quality of Powdered Cyanobacterium - Spirulina Platensis
Lebensmitte[ o
Uatersuchung
und-Forschung
9 Springer-Verlag 1995
Original paper
Storage quality of powdered cyanobacterium - Spirulina platensis
K. R. Kumar, M. Mahadevaswamy, L. V. Venkataraman
Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysore-570013, India
O
,j
35
30
25
/
lower than those of CPR the values found were high in
comparison to those generally reported, i.e. in the range of 15
E
0.5-1.5 g.m-2.24 h -1 and 1 - 4 ml.m-2.24 h-t-kPa-1, respec- .=_
tively [15]. These high values may be attributed to the thin I0
layer of aluminium coating. g
5
f~
Table 2. Changes in moisture, phycocyanin, allophycocyanin and carotene contents of Spirulina during storage
AC NC AC NC AC NC AC NC
0 - 5.52 5.52 6.00 6.00 2.65 2.65 390.00 390.00
30 CPP 7.13 6.00 5.57 5.83 2.22 2.32 275.00 293.33
MPET 6.97 5.87 5.47 5.67 2.37 2.43 321.67 340.67
60 CPP 8.50 6.50 5.00 5.57 1.92 2.23 175.67 197.67
MPET 8.53 6.40 5.17 5.43 2.22 2.32 263.33 291.67
90 CPP 9.60 6.93 4.47 5.37 1.62 2.08 146.67 273.33
MPET 6.50 6.87 4.60 5.23 2.06 2.25 243.33 265.00
120 CPP 10.83 7.60 4.33 4.97 1.42 2.03 130.67 131.67
MPET 10.50 7.27 4.13 5.03 1.85 2.17 227.33 246.67
150 CPP 11.63 7.87 3.53 4.70 1.28 1.92 93.33 126.67
MPET 11.40 7.83 3.67 4.97 1.82 2.02 215.00 206.67
180 CPP 12.40 8.30 3.00 4.53 1.07 1.87 58.67 111.67
MPET 11.90 8.03 3.03 4.70 1.72 1.95 203.33 203.33
Statistics
SEM +0.05 _+0.04 _+0.017 _+1.96
(46 df) (46 dr) (46 df) (46 dr)
1. Between accelerated and *** *** ***
normal conditions (A)
2. Between package types (B) *** NS ***
3. Between storage periods (C) *** *** ***
4. A x B NS NS ***
5. A • C *** *** ***
6. B • C *** *** ***
7. A x B x C NS *** ***
CPR Cast polypropylene; MPET, metallized polyester/low-density Au values are given as means
polyethylene laminate; AC, accelerated condition; NC, normal condi- *** Significant at P <0.001
ton; df. degrees of freedom; NS, not significant
It was observed (Table 3) that the changes in protein, ash A perusal of data in Table 3 indicates that variations in
and fat contents were minimal, ranging between 3% and the content of protein, ash and fat were less under standard
10%. conditions as compared to accelerated conditions. Another
factor that was observed during the storage was the change
in (product) colour. Although under standard conditions the
Storage studies at 27~ and 65% RH colour of the product remained almost unchanged, i.e.
green, in the sample packed in MPET, in the case of CPP
As expected, the changes occurring in the chemical con- pouches, under either storage conditions, the colour had
stituents of stored Spirulina powder a under standard turned blue-green after 60 days of storage, especially under
conditions were less pronounced than those occurring accelerated conditions.
under accelerated conditions.
The increase in the moisture content was gradual in
samples stored in both MPET and CPP pouches (Table 2),
the former type affording slightly better protection. Conclusion
The phycocyanin and allophycocyanin contents also
gradually decreased, but not to the same extent as observed The experiments conducted to investigate the effects of
under accelerated storage conditions. The decrease in the packaging and storage on the cross-flow-dried cyanobacte-
carotene content was also similar to that occurring under rium, SpiruIina platensis, have indicated that the critical
accelerated conditions, i. e. decreases from 390 mg/100 g to moisture content was 12.8% on a dry basis, corresponding
110 mg/100 g and to 210 mg/100 g in CPP and MPET to an aw value of 0.56 at 27 ~ The chemical constituents,
pouches, respectively. protein and fat are less dependent on the storage conditions
292
Table 3. Changes in protein, ash and fat contents of Spirulina during storage
Storage period Package type Constituent
(days)
Protein content (%) Ash content (%) Fat content (%)
AC NC AC NC AC NC
0 - 62.78 62.78 10.70 10.70 1.68 1.68
30 CPP 62.74 62.73 10.36 10.55 1.65 1.64
MPET 61.73 61.35 10.75 10.64 1.64 1.60
60 CPP 62.73 62.40 9.99 10.37 1.61 1.62
MPET 60.90 62.79 10.77 10.44 1.63 1.55
90 CPP 62.19 62.24 9.89 10.27 1.59 1.62
MPET 60.80 62.47 10.84 10.32 1.59 1.59
120 CPP 61.77 62.04 9.83 10.26 1.58 1.65
MPET 60.74 62.06 10.82 10.06 1.58 1.56
150 CPP 61.36 62.27 9.76 10.22 1.58 1.64
MPET 60.73 62.20 10.79 10.07 1.56 1.57
180 CPP 60.95 62.53 9.70 10.17 1.58 1.65
MPET 60.69 62.28 10.82 10.52 1.59 1.58
Statistics
SEM _+0.159 _+0.031 +_0.014
(46 df) (46 df) (46 df)
1. Between accelerated and NS
normal conditions (A)
2. Between package types (B) *** NS NS
3. Between storage periods (C) ***
4. A • ***
5. A x C ***
6. B x C *** *** NS
7. A • *** *** NS
See legend to Table 2 for details of abbreviations
and packaging materials. Ingredients such as phycocyanin, 5. Kumar KR, Mahadevaswamy M, Venkataraman LV (1990) Algol
allophycocyanin and carotene in the product are prone to Stud 58:49
greater loss. Furthermore, material such as MPET affords a 6. Methods of sampling and tests for paper and allied products, IS
1060-1986. Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi
longer shelf-life. Unit pouches made of polypropylene 7. Standard test methods for water vapour transmission of materials.
provide a shelf-life of about 6 months when packed in E-96-1960. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadel-
200 g units even under conditions of high temperature and phia
humidity, while the laminate affords greater protection. 8. Standard test method of test for gas transmission rate of plastic
film and sheeting D. 1434-1966. American Society for Testing and
Acknowledgements. The authors thank Mr. B. S. Ramesh, 6 scientist at Materials, Philadelphia
the Sensory Analysis and Statistical Services Department, CFTRI, for 9. Equilibrium relative humidity values for selected saturated
his invaluable help in the statistical analysis of the experimental data. aqueous salt solutions, E 104 A1. American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia
10. Castanon CA, Barpal AU (1988) Lebensm Wiss Technol 21:212
11. Handbook of food analysis: general methods SP-I8 (part VII)
Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
References 12. Pearson D (1982) The chemical analysis of foods. Chemical
Publishing Co, New York
1. Becker EW (1978) Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnal 11:71 13. Helenkycfa J (1973) Algal biliprotein. In: Hellebust J, Craigie JS
2. Richmond A, Becker EW (1986) Technological aspects of mass (1973) Handbook of physiological methods. Cambridge Univer-
cultivation - a general outline. In: CRC handbook of microalgal sity Press, Cambridge, pp 7 0 - 7 9
mass culture. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 245-263 14. Steel RGD, Torrie JH (1960) Principles and procedures of stati-
3. Venkataraman LV, Becker EW (1985) Biotechnology and utilisa- stics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 194-230
tion of algae - the Indian experience. Department of Science and 15. Kelly RSA (1989) In: Finlayson KM (ed) High barrier metallised
Technology. New Delhi laminates for food packaging in plastics film technology. Tech-
4. Chamorro G (1980) Etude toxicologique de l'algae Spirulina nomic, Lancaster, pp 146-152
plante pilote productrice de proteines (Spirulina de Sosa Texcoco 16. Kumar KR, Balasubramanyam N (1986) Stored Prod Res 22:205
S.A) - UF/MED/78/048/UNIDO/10