Mid Year Review Form For Proficient Teachers

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Jett Bernardo A. Cortez III Name of Rater: Marilyn C, Villon
Position: Teacher III Position: Master Teacher II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Puerto Princesa City Date of Review:
Rating Period: 2021 -2022

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year


Weight Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan
per KRA Results
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 5% Classroom Observation
Education Knowledge knowledge Tool (COT) rating sheet or
Services and of content inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy within and form from
across 1. an observation of
curriculum Synchronous teaching
teaching (limited face-to face teaching,
areas online teaching, or two-way
radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Used 5% One (1) lesson plan with
Education research-based annotations identifying the
Services knowledge research-based knowledge
and principles and/or principles of teaching
of teaching and learning used as basis
and learning to for planning / designing the
enhance lesson
professional
practice

Basic 3. Displayed 5% Classroom Observation Tool


Education proficient use (COT) rating sheet or inter-
Services of Mother observer agreement form
Tongue, from
Filipino and 1. an observation of
English to Synchronous teaching
facilitate (limited face-to-face teaching,
teaching and online teaching, or two-way
learning radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a recorded
video lesson
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
or audio lesson that is
SLM-based or MELCaligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
Demonstration teaching* via
LAC

Basic 4. Used 5% Classroom Observation


Education effective verbal Tool (COT) rating sheet or
Services and non-verbal inter-observer agreement
classroom form from
communication 1. an observation of
strategies to Synchronous teaching
support learner (limited face-to-face teaching,
understanding, online teaching, or two-way
participation, radio instruction)
engagement 2. if option 1 is not possible,
and an observation of a recorded
achievement video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 2. Learning 5. Established Classroom Observation
Education Environme safe and secure 5% Tool (COT) rating sheet or
Services nt learning inter-observer agreement
environments to form from
enhance 1. an observation of
learning through Synchronous teaching
the consistent (limited face-to-face teaching,
implementation online teaching, or two-way
of policies, radio instruction)
guidelines and 2. if option 1 is not possible,
procedures an observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC

Basic 6. Maintained Classroom Observation Tool


Education learning 5% (COT) rating sheet or
Services environments inter-observer agreement
that promote form from
fairness, 1. an observation of
respect and Synchronous teaching
care to (limited face-to-face teaching,
encourage online teaching, or two-way
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
learning radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC

Basic 7. Maintained 5% SET A


Education learning Any supplementary material
Services environments (in print/digital format) made
that nurture by the ratee* and used in the
and inspire lesson delivery that highlights
learners to maintaining learning
participate, environments that nurture
cooperate and inspire learners to
and participate, cooperate and
collaborate in collaborate in continued
continued learning
learning ● activity sheet/s
● one lesson from a self-
learning module
(SLM)
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP,
WLP, WLL, lesson
exemplars, and the likes)
● video lesson
● audio lesson
● other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
specify and provide
annotations) with
client/learner feedback on
how the material encouraged
the learners to participate,
cooperate, and collaborate

SET B
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT) rating sheet or inter-
observer agreement form
from
1. an observation of
synchronous teaching
(limited face-to-face teaching,
online teaching, or two-way
radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching** via
LAC
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 3. Diversity 8. Applied a 5% SET A
Education of Learners, range of Any supplementary material
Services Curriculum successful (in print/digital format) made
and strategies by the ratee* and used in the
Planning, & that maintain lesson delivery that highlights
Assessmen learning a range of strategies that
t and environments maintain learning
Reporting that motivate environments that motivate
learners to learners to work productively
work by assuming responsibility for
productively their own learning
by assuming ● activity sheet/s
responsibility ● one lesson from a self-
for their own learning
learning module (SLM)
● lesson plan (e.g., DLP,
DLL, WHLP,
WLP, WLL, lesson
exemplars, and
the likes)
● video lesson
● audio lesson
● other learning materials in
print/digital format (please
specify
and provide annotations)

SET B
Classroom Observation Tool
(COT)
rating sheet or inter-observer
agreement form from
1. an observation of
synchronous
teaching (limited face-to-face
teaching, online teaching, or
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
two-way radio instruction)
2. if option 1 is not possible,
an observation of a recorded
video lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching** via
LAC

Basic 9. Designed, 5% SET A


Education adapted and Classroom Observation Tool
Services implemented (COT) rating sheet or inter-
teaching observer agreement form
strategies from
that are 1. an observation of
responsive to synchronous teaching
learners with (limited face-to-face teaching,
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
disabilities, online teaching, or two-way
giftedness radio instruction)
and talents 2. if option 1 is not possible,
including ICT, to an observation of a recorded
address video lesson or audio lesson
learning goals. that is SLM-based or MELC-
aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of a
demonstration teaching* via
LAC

SET B
Teacher Reflection Form
(TRF)
on designing, adapting,
and/or implementing teaching
strategies that are responsive
to learners with disabilities,
giftedness and talents and a
certification from the school
head that the ratee’s
classes have no identified
learner/s with disabilities,
giftedness and/or talents

Basic 10. Adapted 5% SET A


Education and used Classroom Observation
Services culturally Tool (COT) rating sheet or
appropriate inter-observer agreement
teaching form from
strategies to 1. an observation of
address the synchronous
needs of teaching (limited face-to-face
learners teaching, online teaching, or
from two-way radio instruction)
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
indigenous 2. if option 1 is not possible,
groups an observation of a
recorded video lesson or
audio lesson that is SLM-
based or MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation of
a demonstration teaching*
via LAC

SET B
Teacher Reflection Form
(TRF) on adapting and using
culturally appropriate
teaching strategies to
address the needs of
learners from indigenous
groups and a certification
from the school head that the
ratee’s classes have no
identified learner/s from
indigenous groups

Basic 11. Adapted and 5% 1. Proof of evaluation* on the


Education implemented implementation of the
Services learning adapted / contextualized
programs that learning program
ensure 2. Progress report on the
relevance and implementation of the
responsiveness adapted / contextualized
to the needs of learning program
all learners 3. Accomplishment/
completion / technical report
on the implementation of an
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
adapted / contextualized
learning program
4. Action plan / activity
proposal / activity matrix that
shows an adapted /
contextualized learning
program
Basic 12. Utilized 5% A list of identified least /
Education assessment most mastered skills based
Services data to inform on the frequency of errors /
the correct responses with any
modification of of the following supporting
teaching and MOV
learning 1. accomplishment report for
practices and remedial / enhancement
programs. activities (e.g., remedial
sessions, Summer
Reading Camp, Phil-IRI-
based reading program)
2. intervention material used
for remediation /
reinforcement /
enhancement
3. lesson plan/activity log for
remediation /
enhancement utilizing of
assessment data to modify
teaching and learning
practices or programs
Basic 4. 13. Maintained 5% 1. Accomplishment report of
Education Community learning a program / project / activity
Services Linkages environments that maintains a learning
and that are environment
Professiona responsive to 2. Program / Project / Activity
l community plan on maintaining a
Engagemen contexts learning environment
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
t& 3. Minutes of a consultative
Personal meeting / community
Growth and stakeholders meeting about a
Professiona program / project / activity
l that maintains a learning
Developme environment with proof of
nt attendance
4. Communication letter
about a program / project /
activity that maintains a
learning environment

Basic 14. Reviewed 5% 1. Annotated video / audio


Education regularly recording of one’s teaching
Services personal that shows impact of
teaching regularly reviewing one’s
practice using teaching practice/s
existing laws 2. Annotated teaching
and regulations material that shows impact of
that apply to the regularly reviewing one’s
teaching teaching practice/s
profession and ● lesson plan
the ● activity sheet
responsibilities ● assessment
specified in the materials
Code of Ethics ● others (please
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
for Professional specify)
Teachers 3. Personal reflection notes
as outputs from participation
in review of personal
teaching practices in four (4)
quarters
4. Proof of attendance (with
date) in LAC or coaching and
mentoring sessions for
review of personal teaching
practices
Basic 15. Complied 5% 1. Proof of participation /
Education with and involvement in a school-
Services implemented community partnership for
school policies the implementation of a
and procedures school policy / procedure
consistently to (e.g., certificate as committee
foster member, narrative report)
harmonious 2. Minutes of parent teacher
relationships conference / stakeholders’
with learners, meeting about an
parents, and implemented school policy /
other procedure with proof of
stakeholders attendance
3. Communication letter
about an implemented school
policy / procedure sent to
parent / guardian
Basic 16. Applied a 5% One (1) lesson plan with
Education personal annotations explaining the
Services philosophy of application of a learner-
teaching that is centered teaching philosophy
learner-centered (e.g., constructivism,
existentialism) used as basis
for planning / designing the
lesson
Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Basic 17. Adopted 5% 1. Documented feedback
Education practices that from superiors, colleagues,
Services uphold the learners, parents / guardian,
dignity of or other stakeholders directly
teaching as a reflecting the ratee’s good
profession by practices that uphold the
exhibiting dignity of teaching as a
qualities such profession
as caring 2. Annotated evidence of
attitude, practice indirectly linking to
respect and the upholding of the dignity of
integrity teaching as a profession by
exhibiting qualities such as
caring attitude, respect and
integrity
● Screenshot of text
message / chat / email / any
form of communication with
parents / guardian or learners
(name or any identifier
removed)
● Remarks from mentor /
master teacher / school head
about one’s qualities (e.g.,
entries in Performance
Monitoring and Coaching
Form
[PMCF] or in Mid-Year
Review Form)
● Recognition from the
school / school community
about one’s qualities
● Others (please specify)

Basic 18. Set 5% 1. Updated IPCRF-DP


Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
per KRA
ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Education professional from Phase II
Services development 2. Mid-year Review Form
goals based on (MRF)
the Philippine 3. IPCRF-DP
Professional 4. Certification from the ICT
Standards for Coordinator / School Head /
Teachers Focal Person in charge of e-
SAT
Basic 5. Plus 19. Performed 10% Any proof of:
Education Factor various related ● committee involvement
Services works / ● advisorship of cocurricular
activities that activities
contribute to ● book or journal authorship /
the teaching- Contributorship
learning ● coordinatorship /
process chairpersonship
● coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
● serving as reliever of
classes in the absence of
teachers
● mentoring pre-service
teachers
● participation in
demonstration
teaching
● participation as technical
working
group member
● others (please specify and
provide annotations)
VILLON, MARILYN C CORTEZ, JETT BERNARDO III A. BADILLA, MARILYN M.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

You might also like