QUESTION 1.

INTRODUCTION

It has been stated that beyond budgeting is a viable alternative management model that can be
used in a variety of business contexts. (Hope and Fraser, 2003a).

Beyond budgeting is all about decoupling top-down control from bottom-up empowerment
by abandoning traditional budgeting principles of relative improvement in favour of fixed
performance contracts. Rather than imposing rigorous metrics and rewards, beyond budgeting
focuses on empowering front-line staff. Thus, this approach is believed to enable businesses
to swiftly modify their plans to changing market conditions. The beyond budgeting idea
strives to help businesses to retain tight ties with their consumers by empowering lower-level
management. Additionally, Hoper and Fraser argue that the approach enables businesses to
recruit and retain bright individuals by offering a demanding work environment.

BEYOND BUDGETING APPROACHES

Beyond Budgeting has condensed 12 guiding concepts into its strategy, six leadership and six
management procedures. (See "Beyond Budgeting's Principles.") They are intended to work
in tandem to assist organisations in developing an integrated and consistent new guiding
model. Beyond Budgeting has slain the corporate budgeting monster for businesses that have
adopted it. They abandoned standard budgeting and focused only on achieving each of the
three objectives in novel ways.
Beyond Budgeting, which introduces four specialised management tools to replace the
budget, maybe the greatest answer for a large organisation. It undoubtedly provides superior
benefits to the budgeting strategy. This strategy may inspire not only employees but also
plant workers, to participate in reaching the objectives established by their supervisors by the
company strategies implemented. Employees will likely recognise that each job they do
affects the outcome, as well as the overall performance of the business. As a result, they will
have a substantial influence. Additionally, this strategy looks to keep the firm informed of
external events, helping it to compete in today's commercial climate. In terms of its
methodology, a rolling financial projection may be quite beneficial in supporting the
business's management in forecasting the revenues, costs, and capital that the firm would
generate in the next year. As a result, managers will be better equipped to avoid making
decisions that might be detrimental to the organisation. Additionally, we believe that this
strategy pushes managers to "think outside the box" and consider the impact of external
factors such as customers when making decisions. Beyond Budgeting is thus recognised as
the most effective management performance metric insofar as it provides a more accurate and
superior planning and control mechanism than budgeting does.

Given that the vast majority of businesses have relied on the traditional budgeting technique
for a long period, quitting it may not be the best course of action for everyone. They viewed
budgeting as a control mechanism in the sense that managers make decisions based on certain
goal data, which results in their actual performance is compared to those target results. Rather
than a smaller business making this decision, it appears that a larger one should. It is more
likely that in a small firm, performance is measured concerning the budget, and the focus is
more on the short term. Additionally, smaller enterprises frequently rely exclusively on their
financial resources. As a result, with a large corporation, the comparison areas are far larger.
Managers can still find an alternate solution if the budget is cancelled, as was the case with
Borealis, through benchmarking. As the organisation becomes more complicated,
comparisons at all levels of performance, financial and non-financial, become necessary. To
compete effectively in today's competitive environment, a business must first assess its
strengths and weaknesses. Traditional budgeting systems, despite their inefficiency,
obsolescence, and flaws, remain required. Management can take advantage of it, but it assists
them in improving communication between departments and assessing the overall
performance of their employees. When original aims are compared to final results, the budget
plays a part in the control system. Beyond Budgeting has a variety of effects on many sectors
of a huge organisation.

JUSTICE & TRUST OF THE ORGANIZATION

It is critical to instil trust in an organization's management control system if management

control processes and their implementation by superiors are to be viewed as objective and
unbiased. The extent to which propriety or entitlement rules are observed can be used to
determine fairness. The term "organisational justice" refers to the degree to which workers
consider their employment relationship is fair inside an organisation. Each employee is
presented with a range of work-related decisions daily. When it comes to an employee's
economic and social well-being, these actions are constantly scrutinised. The majority of
workers doubt whether their subordinates' decisions were made in a "fair" way. Employees
are more likely to accept a decision that is based on fair procedures and is carried out
equitably, even if the outcome has negative effects for them. Additionally, even if the
conclusion is favourable, it may be rejected due to an unfair formulation. Budgeting and
resource distribution are two crucial areas where justice is at stake. To ensure employee
satisfaction, resource allocation and implementation must be equitable, and employees must
be given the chance to participate in this process.

SAFETY OF COMFORT ZONE

Managers and people, in general, tend toward safe havens such as those provided by
budgetary control. The disadvantage of the old way of budgetary management is that it
creates safe havens for managers. Managers' comfort zones are defined by a feeling of routine
and consistency, as well as an environment conducive to problem-solving utilising consistent
approaches and tactics. Ambitious and demanding goals are becoming the norm in managers'
comfort zones. Managers' aim to minimise their risks sometimes results in the rejection of
new business possibilities. Beyond Budgeting forces managers to step outside their comfort
zones. To succeed in stretch zones, management in knowledge-based firms must be
ambitious, prepared to take risks, and able to deal with ambiguity. To be honest, this new set
of requirements for managers may inspire some apprehension because not all managers are
capable of satisfying them, such as being challenged by subordinates and employees or
delegating decision-making to allow for increased employee engagement. As a result,
adopting the necessary mindset changes for a successful Beyond Budgeting plan might be
challenging, as many managers may be hesitant. (Rosanas, 2016)

IMPACT ON THE DECISION MAKING OF A COMPANY

Employees who are free to express their opinions have far higher perceptions of
organisational fairness than those who receive their goals and resources through a top-down,
non-negotiable budget. Employees who see a high level of organisational justice develop
trust, which results in a decrease in budgetary slack. Thus, it appears as though organisational
justice has a moderating influence on the effect of involvement on the decrease of
dysfunctional behaviours. Participation appears to be a critical factor in reducing
dysfunctional behaviours. However, managers' capacity to lead and assist their employees
through this participation process, as well as inspire them through coaching, appears to be
critical for increasing perceived organisational fairness. To summarise these findings, there
appears to be some evidence that reducing dysfunctional effects can be accomplished through
the development of a fair and transparent management control system and its implementation
by managers who employ a leading style that can be described as "coaching" and allowing
their employees to voice their opinions. (Heupel & Schmitz, 2015)

APPLICATION OF BEYOND BUDGETING

The Beyond Budgeting Round Table (BBRT) was founded by management accounting
departments from more than 50 large organisations to create the concept of Beyond
Budgeting. Beyond budgeting, BBRT has emphasised, is not a matter of new tools or
processes. A more plausible explanation is a "management philosophy founded on a set of
principles derived from real-world examples and leading to adaptive performance
management." The key aims of the Beyond Budgeting management paradigm are to increase
enterprises' adaptability and capability to improve performance in a market-driven, highly
competitive, and unpredictable business environment. (Rosanas, 2016)

According to the BBRT study, beyond budgeting is governed by two distinct sets of
regulations. By implementing process principles that support adaptive management
processes, organisations may become more sensitive to their competitive environment and
customer requirements. Second, leadership approaches that support the growing devolution of
duties to teams accountable for customer results improvement.

Example: Adoption of Beyond Budgeting by Borealis

In the Borealis scenario, managers are required to perform forecasting and target setting using
typical budgeting. Budgeting is similar to financial control in that it establishes not just a cap
on expenses, but also a floor. Because the goods and supplier marketplaces are evolving at
such a rapid pace, the budget will become obsolete within weeks. As Borealis describes it,
"their merger came at a time when their profit margins were among the lowest in industry
history." However, 12 months later, circumstances had altered, rendering their earlier
preparation obsolete". Borealis classified investment projects according to their magnitude, to
the degree that the cost of such projects must surpass a specific threshold. Managers and
workers now make investment project approval decisions. Additionally, they are held
accountable for maintaining control over their activities. Initially, project approval was
dependent on the executive board's decision (centralized control). (Tian et al., 2015)

CONCLUSION

The question of whether or not budgeting is a prudent approach to run your business is
unimportant. Budgets must be designed within the framework of strong management
practices to be effective, not as a system that seems wonderful on paper but is poorly
understood by frontline personnel. To be effective, it must be customised for each firm's
specific environment and business plan, as well as congruent with the management style of
the organisation. In many circumstances, budgeting system failures can be attributed to bad
management practices.

However, a budgeting system by itself cannot resolve all of a business's decision-making

problems. In other words, we may occasionally need to go beyond budgeting, but almost
always within the context of a well-thought-out budget system.
QUESTION 2

A critical aspect of traditional budgeting is its capacity to be used as a tool for planning and
monitoring activities to better align the organization's strategy and operations. Additionally, it
enables the comparison of actual performance to planned outcomes to uncover
inconsistencies, examine root causes, and make required revisions to plans. There are various
advantages to following the conventional budgetary procedure.

Managers are required to develop specific plans for attaining the goals of each department or
operation as a result of the budgetary process. This facilitates coordination and
communication by clearly delineating areas of responsibility for financial compliance,
enabling corrective action to be done when variations occur and encouraging staff through
their participation in the budgeting process of generating or developing budgets. Management
time is saved by utilising the management by exception approach. They do, however, have
several significant restrictions, most of which are behavioural in character. Traditional
budgets have a variety of disadvantages, including the view among lower-level managers and
staff that they are imposed by senior management, which can have a detrimental effect on
labour relations, as well as inaccuracy in record keeping. (Nguyen et al., 2018)

Consider it a futile exercise. Budgeting may also encourage managers to overspend as a result
of the "we had better spend it or lose it" mindset. Overestimating expenditures in the
traditional Budget as a planning and control tool is possible due to managers' fear of being
blamed if expenditures exceed the budget while underestimating sales is possible due to
salespeople's fear of missing the sales target and losing performance pay if such a thing exists
in the traditional Budget.

In a global economy, technological, economic, social, and political environment changes

have grown more rapid than ever before. Competition has risen in all industries throughout
the previous century, at least in highly industrialised nations and certain sections of Asia,
Latin America, Eastern Europe, and the Middle East. Beyond Budgeting Concept is a model
for resolving the flaws and behavioural problems associated with traditional budgeting in
enterprises. Not only is it a new planning tool, but it is also a new management paradigm.
Transform the organization's structure and culture from hierarchical to networked, enabling
decision-making to be decentralised and entrepreneurial culture to be fostered. (Stange et al.,
2021)

In other words, to increase the organization's adaptability and flexibility, and to build
systems, processes, and products that meet more lucrative consumer needs than those of
competitors, while continually monitoring growing desires and responding quickly to satisfy
them. This is why Beyond budgeting's success or failure is contingent upon how it is
implemented in an organisation and how management overcomes resistance to change, on
management training in this new model, on the phase of overcoming competitive culture and
teamwork, and on the likelihood that this will occur in the organisation.

Beyond Budget Model's success or failure will therefore be defined by how it is implemented
and if managers perceive it as yet another forced strategy by senior management, as well as
how such behavioural restraints may be overruled by senior management. As long as top
management and their capacity to influence behaviour are leveraged, Beyond Budget may
develop into a more flexible procedure that solves some of the most major shortcomings of
traditional budgeting. That is, for the Beyond Budget Model to be effective, the appropriate
culture and structure must be established. It is not a straightforward task, and there is no
quick fix. This method is most likely to have been used by small and medium-sized firms.
(Stange et al., 2021)

Even in large firms, this paradigm is not widely used. On the other hand, the Beyond Budget
Approach is best suited to knowledge-based industries, whereas the traditional budgeting
model may be more effective.

The fact that many businesses continue to employ the conventional budgeting model
indicates that these organisations feel the traditional model has some value, as well as that it
may be beneficial for many corporations or that they have developed solid budgeting
practices. Without a doubt, the Beyond Budget Model is capable of resolving some of the
behavioural difficulties inherent in budgeting. In some circumstances, traditional budgeting
may outperform the Beyond Budget strategy. However, it has its own set of behavioural
issues that must be addressed for it to be more successful. As noted previously, its efficacy is
contingent upon a variety of factors. When applying the aforementioned behavioural
problems to this case, it is necessary to evaluate the underlying culture and organisational
structure.

For instance, one may claim that a centralised organisation would struggle to execute a model
such as beyond budgeting due to excessive conflict and empire-building processes, which
could obstruct top management's successful implementation of the model. Any new model
will face criticism due to the disruption of the status quo, and managers may resist changes to
retain their power and territory within the organisation.

When adopting Beyond Budget, senior management must consider the behavioural
implications, as it represents a significant departure from the previous approach, and the
culture may oppose such a shift. That is why senior management must consider behavioural
difficulties, as it is challenging to undertake a significant departure from the established
paradigm, and the culture may oppose. Beyond the budget, models may not work if the
business is a centralised rather than a decentralised organisation. Even though managers
dislike exact budgeting in this situation, they may lack the necessary skills, motivation, and
hindsight to plan well. While the traditional budget provides several advantages for
organisations, it also comes with its own set of behavioural limits that management must
consider before dismissing effective budgeting practices and the use of technology and tools
for budgeting.

Even while the Beyond Budget Model addresses some budgeting difficulties, it still has its
own set of behavioural issues that must be addressed for it to be effective in all organisational
contexts, and these behavioural issues may vary by firm. The cultural transition takes time,
and no culture can be transformed overnight. This is crucial since the Beyond Budget
approach demands and is reliant on a considerable behavioural adjustment and change. In
practice, this model has a significant disadvantage that management must consider before
implementing it in an organisation without taking into consideration the model's complexity
and radical nature, which are hard to anticipate.

Behavioural Implications of Budgeting

1. Dysfunctional Behaviour
2. Participative Budgeting
3. Excessive Pressure Created by Budgets
4. Budgetary Slack
5. Top Management Support
6. Inter-Departmental Conflict
(Agarwal, 2015)
 References

Agarwal, R. (2015, May 13). Behavioural Implications of Budgeting (6 Implications). Your

Article Library. https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/accounting/budgeting-

accounting/behavioural-implications-of-budgeting-6-implications/52800

Heupel, T., & Schmitz, S. (2015). Beyond Budgeting - A High-hanging Fruit The Impact of

Managers’ Mindset on the Advantages of Beyond Budgeting. Procedia Economics

and Finance, 26, 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00831-x

Nguyen, D. H., Weigel, C., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2018). Beyond budgeting: review and

research agenda. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 14(3), 314–337.

https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-03-2017-0028

Rosanas, J. M. (2016). Budgeting Beyond Budgeting. SSRN Electronic Journal.

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2844085

Stange, S., Bogsnes, B., & Sheth, H. (2021, September 1). Going Beyond Budgeting. BCG

Global. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2021/the-future-is-beyond-budgeting

Tian, J., Lin Ni, Q., Hao, Q., & Wu, D. (2015). The Application of the Beyond Budgeting to

Organisations -An Example of Application of Borealis Company. The Application of

the beyond Budgeting to Organisations, 3(1).

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268084782.pdf