Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Impact OFA Telecommunication Service: 10148 Torino
Environmental Impact OFA Telecommunication Service: 10148 Torino
OF A
TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICE
Albert0 Ramella
Environmental Engineering - Politecnico di Torho
24, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi - Torino (Italy)
ABSTRACT I INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study is to apply the LCA The Telecom Italia S.p.a. is the most important
methodology to a -TLC service. The automatic telecommunication (TLC) operator in Italy for futed
answering and messages storage service for the network. The action for improve their environmental
fixed network has been chosen as a case study performances are shown in the “Annual
because of its large utilization. Two different Environmental Report” [l]. In order to evaluate the
systems, providing the same service to the users, environmental impact of a TLC service in this job the
have been studied. The environmental impact of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology [2]
the ‘kentralized answering machine” system and [3][4] has been applied.
the “home answering machine” have been LCA analysis is, in fact, a useful tool to evaluate
evaluated and compared. the environmental impact of a product or process and
The environmental impacts of the answering allow to individuate and choose the best
and message storing service are mainly generated environmental friendly ones.
in the production of the apparatus supplying the In order to use LCA methodology for study a
service and their use phases. telecommunication service it is important to divide
In the use of LCA methodology application to and reduce the service in elementary part based on the
this service, several problem, like the functional electronic equipment necessary to provide it [5], and
unit and the boundary cuts, have to be solved. hence apply LCA to these electronicequipment.
TLC system are multi-services provider, the The automatic answering and messages storage
allocation of the energy, materials and waste to service for fvred network has been chosen as a case
one specific service have to be properly managed. study because of its large utilization. Centralized and
The detailed study of components and material home “answering machine” have been evaluated and
balance was done to perform the LCA. The compared from an environmental point of view.
inventory data was obtained from: commercial
data base (where available), specialized literature II CENTRALIZED AND HOME ANSWERING
and data sheet and direct experimental data. MACHINE SYSTEMS
The study allow to quantify the decrease in the
environmental impact for the centralized solution The main goal of the service is to store phone
in ordered of magnitude. messages and allow the users to pIay they later.
It is also shown that after very few years the In Fig. 1 and in Fig. 2 the home answering
use phase of the service become more important in machine system named “ Memovox ” [6] and
the environmental impact than the production centralized answering machine system named ARAM
phase. (Apparato Registrazione Ascolto Messaggi) [7] are
shown respectively. Memovox apparatus are
distributed to the customers by the Telecom Italia
1
0-7803-6655-7/01/$10.00 02001 IEEE 273
S.p.a. while ARAM systems are located in the main III LCA METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO
Telephonic Exchange Centers in Italy. THE SERVICE
IV INVENTORY
In the Memovox, messages are recorded in a LCA analysis has been performed on the materials
Random Access Memory integrated circuit, located utilized to manufacture the equipment throw the their
on a printed wire board (PWB). mass balance.
The ARAM system is formed by several racks The home answering machine, Memovox, is
equipped with PWBs and the messages are stored in based on the most diffused telephone equipment in
Hard Disk units. Italy, Sirio 2000 (Fig. 3), manufactured by Siemens
The ARAM system studied provide services for and Alcatel and distributed by Telecom Italia S.p.a
100000 users. The choose of Memovox is due to its e large
The similarity of the two version of the service, difhsion, compared with several other commercial
about 15 messages of 90 seconds recorded, allow answering machine, and because the service provide
easily to compare quantitatively the environmental is similar to that of the ARAM.
impact of the two systems.
2
274
In the hard disc magnets a large quantity of
neodymium (Nd) was also found.
3
275
I ~~ ~
Tin (Sn) I 5.21 I 2.6 I 479318 I
Iron (Fe) 173.76 4.06 1191700.86
Lead (Pb) 3.3 1.61 5275.16
Nickel (Ni) 0.25 0.05 2977.85
Zinc (Zn) 4.88 0.9 955.37
~~
Aluminum (Al) 11.91 1.61 180706.82
Silver (Ag) 0.22 0.06 1684.182
Gold (Au) 0.02 0.01 143.242
Platinum (Pt) - - 4.86
Chromium (Cr) 0 0 97.218
Palladium (Pd) 0.07 0.01 23.027
Molybdenum (MO) - -
I 4.05
4
276
V DATA ELABORATION in which PA [W] is the electrical power and t [s ] the
lifetime of the equipment, estimated in the range of
In order to compare Memovox and ARAM it is 3 - 5 years.
important to refer data to the same functional unit. The ratio of MemovodARAM energy
Data from ARAM have to be divided by 100000 to consumption related to the electrical power is:
compare with the single user Memovox system. I RE= 25.8
The environmental load due to the materials (in
Mega Joule [MJ1 ) were evaluated using the I
Boustead model [16]. In Tab. 2 the environmental 2.5
load, EM,for Memovox, SIRIO 2000 and ARAM are
T 2
\
reported. For the home answering machine the 2 1.5
difference between Memovox system (telephone plus
S I
answering machine) and S R I 0 2000 (only
telephone) give the irnpact related to answering and 5 0.5
messages storage service. 0
I MEMOVOX ARAM
5
277
28
1
24
20
16
12
0
0 365 730 1095 1460 1825
Days
Fig. 7 Environmental total load ratio of Memovox and ARAMsystem versus the use phase time
6
278