Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic 6 - Group Dynamics and Managing Teams
Topic 6 - Group Dynamics and Managing Teams
Topic 6 - Group Dynamics and Managing Teams
Group is defined as two or more freely acting persons who share mutual norms, shared goals, and have a common character
Team is defined as a small group of individuals with paired and complementary abilities and skills who are devoted to a
shared objective, performance purposes, and attitude for which they hold themselves jointly responsible.
There are two forms of groups including Formal versus Informal Groups. They are defined and further explained as follows:
Formal Groups are formed to accomplish something productive for the company and usually are led by a leader.
Informal Groups are created by individuals looking for a relationship and have got no formally chosen leader, even though
a leader may appear later on in these types of groups.
Watch the following videos for the explanation of Groups & Teams:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uG-FLOi4OOU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ME1ppZ9WaKU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0GuNAV5SjY
Forming is the first step that includes the process of becoming oriented and becoming familiar. Leaders must make available
time for individuals to come to be familiar and mingle.
Storming is the second step that is described by the advent of personal traits, characters, and roles and disagreements within
the group. Leaders should urge participants to propose suggestions, express differences and disagreements, and work
through their disagreements regarding duties and objectives.
Norming is the third step in which disagreements and conflicts are settled, close connections build, and harmony and
coherence appear. This is called group cohesiveness. Leaders must put emphasis on harmony and assist finding the team
objectives, beliefs, and values.
Performing is the fourth step in which participants focus on resolving issues and challenges as well as fulfilling the designated
duties. Leaders must permit participants to have the liberation they require to do their duties and tasks.
Adjourning is the fifth step in which participants get ready to disband. Leaders can assist and facilitate the shift by ceremonies
honoring “the end” and “new beginnings”.
Title: “5 Stages of Team Building - What You Should Know When Developing Teams or Groups”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtpY9zwuzFM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZbmIg0c2s4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7tOALvmv_Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nlMJcTAz_g
6.3 Building Effective Teams and which one is the ideal one, Small Teams or Large Teams?
Cooperating is defined as attempts which are thoroughly incorporated to accomplish a shared and mutual goal.
Trust is defined as mutual belief in others’ behaviors and intentions.
Cohesiveness is defined as propensity of a group or team to stay together.
Now the question is, are Small Teams more effective than Large Teams? The following information covers advantages and
disadvantages of both small and large teams.
Small teams are usually between 2 to 9 members. They are having better collaboration and better ethical standard in
comparison to large teams but on the other side they have less resources, perhaps less creativity as well as unjust job
allocation.
While Large Teams are usually between 10 to 16 members. They are having additional resources and labor division in
comparison to small teams but on the other side, they have less collaboration, less ethical standards, and social loafing.
Some good examples and perspectives when team size is concerned are as follows:
There is a rule called “two pizza” that says if two pizzas are not enough to feed a team with it, that team is probably too large
or there is this famous quote from a Harvard business school professor that says there must not more than six members in a
team for it to be effective and at the end, this a subjective matter and many corporations have their own ideal sizes of
effective teams.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwJzVmTR92s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3b-RPldhSOQ
6.4 Group Roles & Norms and Why These Norms are Imposed
Roles are a publicly established and defined prospect and expectation of how a person must act in a particular situation.
They consist of task roles, maintenance roles.
On the other side, Norms are broad and common regulations that the majority of members in group or team follow and
adhere to.
The following are the main reasons why Norms are Enforced:
Watch the following videos to understand Roles & Norms and Why these Norms are Imposed further:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XesZipjhbI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-TM6kINcUs
Groupthink is a unified and blind group’s reluctance to think about other available options. The symptoms of groupthink are
as follows:
• Invulnerability, labelling of opposition party, and innate ethics
• Justification and self-editing
• Wrong Sense of unity and harmony, cohort pressure, and mind shields (mind guards).
• Groupthink versus “the wisdom of the crowds” (the insight of the gathering crowds and people)
Conflict is defined as process in which one group realizes that its concerns are being resisted or adversely impacted by
another group. Conflicts can be functional and dysfunctional as follows:
Dysfunctional Conflict is a conflict that impedes the company's performance or endangers its benefit
Functional Conflict is a conflict that promotes the main objectives of the company and helps serving its benefits
Article Titled: “Groupthink and Project Performance: The Influence of Personal Traits and Interpersonal Ties”
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/53302953.pdf
- end of topic –