Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 4 Present Worth Analysis - Rev
Module 4 Present Worth Analysis - Rev
Outline Module 4
Proposals for Investment Alternatives
Selection of Alternatives
Present-worth comparison
Future Worth Analysis
Capitalized-cost calculation
1
9/15/2022
Selection of Alternatives
Decision criteria in an economic analysis can be done
comparing mutually exclusive alternatives:
The differences between alternatives
highest inflow or lowest outflow
The minimum attractive rate of return
highest rate of return
Payback period
shortest payback period
Do nothing
2
9/15/2022
Selection of Alternatives
Selection of two or more (investment) alternatives by
comparing their economic values.
Method for comparison of alternatives:
present values,
future worth,
capitalized cost,
annual values,
rate of returns, or
payback period
Conditions of comparison:
equal lives
different lives
4-5 SI-4151 Ekonomi Teknik
MARR
Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return
Minimum amount the investor is willing to accept for the use
of money Rate of Return
Different from lending rates
Expected
More akin to Opportunity Cost of the money Rate of Return
on New Proposal
Determined by Company Policy
Range for ROR
On accepted
proposals
All proposals
must offer at MARR
Least MARR
to be considered ROR on
Safe investment
3
9/15/2022
Present-worth comparison
The comparison of alternatives is made by transforming
all future receipts and expenditures into equivalent
today’s rupiah
Example:
Two types of production systems are being considered based on
MARR of 12% per year and the following characteristics:
system A system B
Initial cost Rp. 625.000.000,- Rp. 570.000.000,-
Monthly expenses Rp. 45.750.000,- Rp. 55.750.000,-
Receipts Rp. 152.000.000,- / quarter Rp. 140.000.000,- / 4 months
Salvage value Rp. 225.000.000,- Rp. 190.000.000,-
Life 3 tahun 3 tahun
Present-worth comparison
SV
System A:
R R R R R R R R R R R R
I
E
0 1 2 3
4
9/15/2022
Present-worth comparison
SV
System B:
R R R R R R R R R
I
E
0 1 2 3
PB = -I - E(P/A, iB, 36) + R(P/F, iB, 4) + R(P/F, iB, 8) + … + R(P/F, iB, 36) + SV(P/F, iB, 36)
Present-worth comparison
To have a fair comparison of alternatives with different
lives, the time span over must made equal:
a) The time period of comparison is made equal to
the least common multiple (LCM) for their lives.
Cash flows of the shorter period will be extended up to
the remaining time period of comparison
10
5
9/15/2022
Present-worth comparison
Example:
Two types of production systems are being considered based on MARR of 12% per
year and the following characteristics:
system A system B
Initial cost Rp. 625.000.000,- Rp. 770.000.000,-
Monthly expenses Rp. 45.750.000,- Rp. 55.750.000,-
Monthly receipts Rp. 32.000.000,- Rp. 40.000.000,-
Salvage value Rp. 225.000.000,- Rp. 110.000.000,-
Life 2 tahun 4 tahun
11
Present-worth comparison
System A:
R
SV
I
E
0 1 2
System B:
R
SV
I
E
0 1 2 3 4
12
6
9/15/2022
I I2
E1 E2
0 1 2 3 4
System B:
R
SV
I
E
0 1 2 3 4
13
I
E
0 1 2
System B:
R Estimated SV
I
E
0 1 2 3 4
14
7
9/15/2022
A1 A2 A3
Electric Power Gas Power Solar Power
First Cost: -2500 First Cost: -3500 First Cost: -6000
Ann. Op. Cost: -900 Ann. Op. Cost: -700 Ann. Op. Cost: -50
Sal. Value: +200 Sal. Value: +350 Sal. Value: +100
Life: 5 years Life: 5 years Life: 5 years
15
0 1 2 3 4 5
-2500 A = -900/Yr.
FSV = 350
A2: Gas
0 1 2 3 4 5
A = -700/Yr.
-3500
FSV = 100
A3:Solar
0 1 2 3 4 5
A = -50/Yr.
-6000 i = 10%/yr and n = 5
4-16 SI-4151 Ekonomi Teknik
16
8
9/15/2022
17
Example 2:
Location A Location B
First cost, $ -15,000 -18,000
Annual lease cost,
$ per year -3,500 -3,100
Deposit return,$ 1,000 2,000
Lease term, years 6 9
18
9
9/15/2022
19
A
6 years 6 years 6 years
B
9 years 9 years
18 years
20
10
9/15/2022
21
22
11
9/15/2022
23
24
12
9/15/2022
25
26
13
9/15/2022
27
28
14
9/15/2022
(1 + i ) n − 1
P = A n
i (1 + i )
On the right hand side, divide both
numerator and denominator by (1+i)n
1
1 −
(1 + i ) n
P = A
i
4-29 SI-4151 Ekonomi Teknik
29
CC Derivation…
Repeating: 1
1 −
(1 + i ) n
P = A
i
If “n” approaches the above reduces
to:
A
P=
i
4-30 SI-4151 Ekonomi Teknik
30
15
9/15/2022
CC Explained
31
32
16
9/15/2022
0 1 2 3 4 ..... 9 10 11 ……..
$35,000/yr
i = 6%/year
$50 Million
$100,000
$2 Million
33
34
17
9/15/2022
Truss Design:
/////
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7/ 8 9 10 11 …..
A. Maint. = $20,000/yr
n=
Paint: -40,000 Paint: -40,000 Paint: -40,000
35
Truss Design:
/////
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7/ 8 9 10 11 …..
A. Maint. = $20,000/yr
n=
Paint: -40,000 Paint: -40,000 Paint: -40,000
36
18
9/15/2022
Truss Design:
/////
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7/ 8 9 10 11 …..
A. Maint. = $20,000/yr
n=
Paint: -40,000 Paint: -40,000 Paint: -40,000
37
A2 = -$40,000(A/F,6%,3) = -$12,564/year
4-38 SI-4151 Ekonomi Teknik
38
19
9/15/2022
A3 = -$190,000(A/F,6%,10) =-$14,421
4-39 SI-4151 Ekonomi Teknik
39
CC2 = (A1+A2+A3)/i
CC2 = -(20,000+12,564+14,421)/0.06
CC2 – $783,083
CCTotal = CC1 + CC2 =-40.783 million
40
20
9/15/2022
Homework
The municipal government of Bandung is considering two
proposals to build new toll highway system.
The first alternative calls for upgrading the existing system,
which would cost Rp. 225,75 B for construction and additional
Rp 210 M and Rp 250 M per year for maintenance and
operation cost
The other option is to build a new elevated highway that is
estimated to cost Rp. 885 B for construction and annual
maintenance cost of Rp 325 M
If either alternatives would yield Rp 815 M revenue per
year, and the interest rate is set at 8% p.a., which
alternative should the government go about realizing the
toll highway system?
41
Homework
2. A manufacturing company is trying to decide among three different pieces of equipment that have the following characteristics:
equipment A equipment B equipment C
First cost Rp. 975.000.000,- Rp. 854.500.000,- Rp. 1.025.000.000,-
Annual M&O cost Rp. 89.700.000,- Rp. 95.000.000,- Rp. 75.000.000,-
Salvage value Rp. 161.000.000,- Rp. 205.000.000,- Rp. 321.000.000,-
Overhaul cost Rp. 175.000.000,- / 2 years Rp. 135.000.000,- / 3 years Rp. 175.000.000,- / 3 years
useful life = 6 years and interest rate of 12% per year.
3. Which of these two machines that have the following costs is to be selected for a continuous production process, if the i = 15%
p.a:
machine X machine Y
First cost Rp. 3.800.000.000,- Rp. 1.675.000.000,-
Annual operating cost Rp. 289.700.000,- Rp. 315.000.000,-
Salvage value Rp. 461.000.000,- Rp. 205.000.000,-
Life 5 years 3 years
4. Ganesha consulting firm is considering to build or lease an office space. For interest rate of 6% compounded semiannualy
compare and select alternative. build own lease
Construction cost Rp. 8.750.000.000,- -
Lease cost - Rp. 415.000.000,- / 3 years
Maintenance cost Rp. 110.000.000,- / year Rp. 75.000.000,- / year
Period ∞ 3 years
42
21