COMPLIANCE MATRIX

Date Received: June 3, 2020

Researchers:
Callos, Jude Lester C.
Marzan, Mark Genson P.
Muyco, Sarah Mae N.
Ruiles, Mary Joy D.
Torero, Justin T.
Title: Rice Straw Ash as Pozzolanic Material for Precast Pervious Concrete

Panels Comments/ Suggested Revisions

Items Action Taken Page Remarks
Panel 1 Panel 2 Panel 3
Engr.
Engr. Francis Engr. Richelle
Preliminaries Floradelle
V. Villacorta C. Vedad
A. Vega
Include the The different types
Related different of pozzolans were
12
Literature class of discussed in the
pozzolans related literature.
According to
ASTM C 618
(2012), Pozzolans
are classified into
three classes; Class
N; Raw or calcined
natural pozzolans
such as some
diatomaceous
earths, opaline
cherts, shales, tuffs
and volcanic ashes
or pumicites
(calcined or
uncalcined) and
various materials
requiring
calcination to
induce satisfactory
properties, such as
some clays and
shales; Class F; Fly
ash normally
produced from
burning anthracite
or bituminous coal.
This class fly ash
has pozzolanic
properties and Class
C—Fly ash
normally produced
from lignite or
 subbituminous coal
that meets the
applicable
requirements for.
This class of fly
ash, in addition to
having pozzolanic
properties, also has
some cementitious
properties.

Data Analysis Include the b. Standard

standard Deviation. The
deviation standard deviation
was used to
determine how
dispersed the
infiltration rate,
porosity and
compressive strength
gain in each group
relative to its mean.
The formula is
written below:

s=
√ ∑ ( x−x )2
n−1

Where:
s = standard
deviation
𝑛 = no. of
observation
𝑥 = the observed
 values of a sample
item
𝑥̅ = the mean value
of the observations

Presentation, Comparison The

Analysis and of physical researchers
Interpretation and chemical specified
properties if the
of Data
accepted or maximum
not. acceptable
limit of the
properties
in 33-37
accordance
to ASTM
C618 for
better
comparison
of data.

Review your The

data and researchers 41
discuss performed
further the one-sigma
differences in limit in
results. accordance
to ASTM
Double check C670 to
your data to test
properly whether the
compare the results
results. were
reliable.
Review your Through
statistics comparison
, it was
observed
that all the
ranges for
each group
of results
were less
than the
48-52
maximum
acceptable
range
value.
Therefore,
all the
individual
results
were
acceptable.
However,
there are
inconsisten
cy in the
porosity of
B3 and this
is due to
some errors
in
experiment
ation and
 accurate
sizing of
molds
used.

Conclusion Arrange The conclusions

conclusions were properly
based on the arranged and
analyzed based from
statement of
the statement of the
the problem problem

Recommendati Arrange The The microscopic detail were added to the

on recommendat microscopic recommendation and arranged according or
ions based on detail of the based from the results gathered.
the results RSA can be
and added to the
conclusions. recommend
ation

Additional comments:
Double check the alignments and paragraph spacing