Peer Evaluation Form for Research Group

Chapters 1-2 Draft

Evaluation for Members ( Group 2)
Leaders’ names:
1. Reyes, John Auldrey P. 3. Pantaleon, Rina Lyn S.
2. Villasante, Joshua Paul I. 4. Rodriguez, Glory Shane M.
Members’ names:
1. PRADO, MARLA ANGELICA B.
2. CORPORAL JHUN MARK B
3. SUPERABLE, MARK ANTHONY N
4. CEJAS RAFAEL Z
5. ONG, FRANCINE EUNICE P.
6. CAPILITAN, RAM LOUISE M.
7. BETAIZAR, DANIELA M.
8. MARTINEZ, JANUARY, M.
9. DE LEON, NADINE DHEA I
10. VICTORINO, SETH YANCY
11. VON POSSEL, JESUS GABRIEL
12. RELUCIO, RYLLIZA KATE
13. TAMO, CRESSIE LHEI

The numbers represent your group members in each column. For each person, indicate the extent to
which you agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4 (1=Strongly Disagree;
2=Disagree; 3=Agree; 4=Strongly Agree). Total the numbers in each column.

Evaluation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Criteria
1. Attends group 4 4 1 2 4 4 1 1 2 3
meetings regularly
and on time.

2. Contributes 3 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 2 4
meaningfully to
group discussions.

3. Completes group 4 3 2 1 4 4 2 2 3 2
assignments on
time.

4. Prepares work in 4 2 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 4
a quality manner.

5. Demonstrates a 4 4 2 4 4 2 2 2 3 4
cooperative and
supportive attitude.

6. Contributes 4 3 1 4 4 2 2 1 2 3
significantly to the
success of the
research project
 TOTAL: 18 9 15 22 17 11 9 14 20
23

The numbers represent your group members in each column. For each person, indicate the extent to
which you agree with the statement on the left, using a scale of 1-4 (1=Strongly Disagree;
2=Disagree; 3=Agree; 4=Strongly Agree). Total the numbers in each column.

Evaluation 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Criteria
1. Attends group 1 2 1
meetings regularly
and arrives on
time.

2. Contributes 2 2 2
meaningfully to
group discussions.

3. Completes group 2 4 3
assignments on
time.

4. Prepares work in 1 3 2
a quality manner.

5. Demonstrates a 3 4 4
cooperative and
supportive attitude.

6. Contributes 1 2 2
significantly to the
success of the
research project

TOTAL: 10 17 14

Feedback on team dynamics:

1. How effectively did your group work?

= Our group work effectively managed to produce proper outcomes by proper management and
hardwork, but there are times where there are communication issues which caused problems in the
final outcomes

2. Were the behaviors of any of your team members particularly valuable or detrimental to the
team? Explain.

= Yes, their behavior influenced the group dynamics positively which produced a satisfactory
environment, the leaders and members benefited by the positive attitude and behaviors that they
bring to the group.

3. What did you learn about working in a group from this project that you will carry into your next
group experience?

= Proper utilization of tools and resources that can benefit the group and producing a better
communications skills to be able to work productively and lessen the misunderstanding when creating
outcomes.

Adapted from a peer evaluation form developed at Johns Hopkins University (October, 2006)