Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Case 1:15-cv-00293-LTS-RWL Document 420 Filed 09/06/19 Page 1 of 5

FOSTER, WALKER &._DI MARCO


ATTORNEYS AT LAW

September 6, 2019
ViaECF

Hon. Laura Taylor Swain


United States District Court
Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1312

Re: S&A Capital Partners, Inc., et al. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al.
Civil Action No. 15-CV-293 (LTS) (RWL)

Dear Judge Swain:

Per your Honor's Order, dated August 21, 2019 (Docket No. 419), the Plaintiffs hereby
submit this filing to articulate their position regarding the unsealing of exhibits previously filed
under seal with respect to the parties' motions for partial summary judgment.

As this Court is aware, the Protective Order in this case (Docket No. 127) provides for
several categories of documents to be designated as confidential, and pursuant to Paragraph 12
of the Protective Order requires that such documents be filed under seal. 1 It was on this basis,
and others expressed herein, that Plaintiffs filed the identified Exhibits under seal.

The majority of the exhibits that Plaintiffs filed under seal were documents Defendants
produced in discovery and marked as "Confidential/Subject to Protective Order." (Exhibit A.)
As the Plaintiffs detailed when responding to this Court's previous request for clarification
regarding the filing of documents under seal (Docket No. 372), the Defendants have been as
indiscriminate in marking documents confidential as they have been unrelenting in their threats
to seek judicial intervention whenever the Plaintiffs so much as reference a document so
labeled. Because the Defendants, prior to your Honor's August 21, 2019 Order, maintained that
no document marked as "Confidential/Subject to Protective Order" may be entered in the public
record, with the exception of the expert reports noted below, the Plaintiffs filed each of these
documents under seal pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the Protective Order (Docket No. 127).

In response to your Honor's August 21, 2019 Order, Plaintiffs contacted Chase and

1
Paragraph 3(c) of the Protective Order designates as confidential, for the purposes of the Order,
"confidential or proprietary business information or communications, or other confidential research, development,
or commercial information or communications." Paragraph 3(d) designates as confidential, for the purposes of the
Order, "any information ofa personal or intimate nature regarding any individual." Paragraph 4 further designates
as confidential "nonpublic personal information," including "financial or credit information for any person ...
together with personally identifiable information with respect to such person .... "

Foster, Walker &_Di Marco, P.C. I 350 Main Street, Third Floor, Malden, MA 02148
T 781-322-3700 I F 781-322-3757 I www.fwd-law.com
Case 1:15-cv-00293-LTS-RWL Document 420 Filed 09/06/19 Page 2 of 5

inquired whether Chase would agree to unseal documents they marked as Confidential/Subject to
Protective Order. Chase responded that they agreed to unconditionally unseal some of those
documents, and others subject to redactions. Chase then provided proposed redactions for
Plaintiffs' review and the parties have been and continue to work towards reaching an agreement
as to the scope of the redactions. In fact, the parties have essentially agreed to the scope of
redactions on all but a few documents as of this filing, and anticipate that full agreement can be
achieved expeditiously.

Eight exhibits filed under seal with the Plaintiffs' March 8, 2019 motion for partial
summary judgment were either expert reports or excerpts from the depositions of the parties'
experts. (Docket Nos. 353-10, 353-20, 353-25, 353-27, 353-43, 353-63, 353-93, 353-94.) It has
previously been determined by the parties and this Court that such documents, absent a more
particular grounds for confidentiality, may be filed on the public record. (See Docket Nos. 372,
374.) As such, the Plaintiffs, with the consent of the Defendants, do not object to the unsealing
of these documents.

A further three exhibits are excerpts from the third-party deposition of Erika Lance.
(Docket Nos. 324-72, 353-78, 389-57.) These exhibits were filed under seal pursuant to a
separate Order of this Court relating specifically to this deposition and the deposition of Brian
Bly. (Docket Nos. 249, 250). Plaintiffs contacted counsel for Nationwide Title Clearing (for
whom Lance was employed) and counsel has agreed to unseal the specifically identified exhibits.
Chase takes no position with regard to these documents, so the parties consent that they may be
unsealed.

Two exhibits, Docket Nos. 353-92 and 389-89, are the same document, a QuickBook
report detailing Plaintiff MRS' s expenditures on payroll which was filed under seal pursuant to
Paragraph 3(c) of the Protective Order. Based upon the Court's recent Order, neither Plaintiff
MRS nor Chase object to the unsealing of either Exhibit.

In summary, Plaintiffs and Chase agree to the below with respect to the unsealing of
documents. Where redaction is indicated, it is typically a redaction of borrower information (i.e.,
name and street address of the property), which the parties maintain should remain out of public
view. We anticipate being able to provide redacted exhibits in short order should the Court order
same either for review or public filing.

Docket No. 324


8: Unseal with Redaction
15: Unseal
26: Unseal
36: Unseal with Redaction
51: Unseal with Redaction
65: Unseal with Redaction
68: Unseal with Redaction
69: Unseal
72: Unseal

FOSTE~ WALKER &._DI MARCO


ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Case 1:15-cv-00293-LTS-RWL Document 420 Filed 09/06/19 Page 3 of 5

Docket No. 344:


6: Unseal with Redaction
8: Unseal with Redaction
9: Unseal with Redaction

Docket No. 353


8: Unseal with Redaction
10: Unseal
15: Unseal
20: Unseal
25: Unseal
27: Unseal
28: Unseal
29: Unseal with Redaction
35: Unseal with Redaction
43: Unseal
45: Unseal with Redaction
61: Unseal with Redaction
63: Unseal
65: Unseal
66: Unseal with Redaction
67: Unseal with Redaction
69: Unseal with Redaction
71: Unseal with Redaction
72: Unseal with Redaction
73: Unseal with Redaction
75: Unseal
77: Unseal with Redaction
78: Unseal
83: Unseal with Redaction
84: Unseal with Redaction
85: Unseal with Redaction
86: Unseal with Redaction
87: Unseal with Redaction
88: Unseal with Redaction
92: Unseal
93: Unseal
94: Unseal
97: Unseal with Redaction

Docket No. 389


14: Unseal with Redaction
16: Unseal
18: Unseal with Redaction
19: Unseal

FOSTER, WALKER &.._DI MARCO


AT'IOR.NEYS AT LAW
Case 1:15-cv-00293-LTS-RWL Document 420 Filed 09/06/19 Page 4 of 5

50: Unseal with Redaction


51: Unseal with Redaction
52: Unseal with Redaction
57: Unseal
61: Unseal with Redaction
62: Unseal with Redaction
63: Unseal with Redaction
64: Unseal with Redaction
65: Unseal with Redaction
66: Unseal with Redaction
67: Unseal with Redaction
68: Unseal with Redaction
69: Unseal with Redaction
70: Unseal with Redaction
71: Unseal with Redaction
72: Unseal with Redaction
74: Unseal with Redaction
75: Unseal with Redaction
80: Unseal with Redaction
81: Unseal with Redaction
85: Unseal with Redaction
87: Unseal with Redaction
89: Unseal
96: Unseal with Redaction

Docket No. 400


3: Unseal with Redaction
4: Unseal
6: Unseal
14: Unseal with Redaction
18: Unseal with Redaction
20: Unseal with Redaction
21: Unseal with Redaction
22: Unseal with Redaction
23: Unseal with Redaction
24: Unseal with Redaction
27: Unseal with Redaction
28: Unseal with Redaction
30: Unseal with Redaction
31: Unseal

FOSTER, WALKER &J)I MARCO


ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Case 1:15-cv-00293-LTS-RWL Document 420 Filed 09/06/19 Page 5 of 5

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Roberto L. Di Marco
Roberto L. Di Marco, Esq.
Foster, Walker & Di Marco, P.C.
350 Main Street, Third Floor
Malden, MA 02148
rdimarco@fwd-law.com

cc: All Counsel of Record (via ECF)

FOSTER, WALKER&.._DIMARCO
ATrORNEYS AT LAW

You might also like