Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21MST18 - M1 - Overview of Research
21MST18 - M1 - Overview of Research
21MST18 - M1 - Overview of Research
Research Design
Research design is the framework of research methods and techniques chosen by a researcher
to conduct a study. The design allows researchers to sharpen the research methods suitable
for the subject matter and set up their studies for success.
Creating a research topic explains the type of research (experimental, survey research,
correlational, semi-experimental, review) and its sub-type (experimental design, research
problem, descriptive case-study).
There are three main types of designs for research:
1. Data collection
2. Measurement
3. Analysis
The research problem an organization faces will determine the design, not vice-versa. The
design phase of a study determines which tools to use and how they are used.
Research Design Elements
Impactful research usually creates a minimum bias in data and increases trust in the accuracy
of collected data. A design that produces the slightest margin of error in experimental
research is generally considered the desired outcome. The essential elements are:
Accurate purpose statement
Techniques to be implemented for collecting and analyzing research
The method applied for analyzing collected details
Type of research methodology
Probable objections to research
Settings for the research study
Timeline
Measurement of analysis
Characteristics of Research Design
A proper design sets your study up for success. Successful research studies provide insights
that are accurate and unbiased. You’ll need to create a survey that meets all of the main
characteristics of a design. There are four key characteristics:
Neutrality: When you set up your study, you may have to make assumptions about the data
you expect to collect. The results projected in the research should be free from bias and
neutral. Understand opinions about the final evaluated scores and conclusions from multiple
individuals and consider those who agree with the results.
Reliability: With regularly conducted research, the researcher expects similar results every
time. You’ll only be able to reach the desired results if your design is reliable. Your plan
should indicate how to form research questions to ensure the standard of results.
Validity: There are multiple measuring tools available. However, the only correct measuring
tools are those which help a researcher in gauging results according to the objective of the
research. The questionnaire developed from this design will then be valid.
Generalization: The outcome of your design should apply to a population and not just a
restricted sample. A generalized method implies that your survey can be conducted on any
part of a population with similar accuracy.
The above factors affect how respondents answer the research questions, so they should
balance all the above characteristics in a good design.
Research Design Types
A researcher must clearly understand the various research design types to select which model
to implement for a study. Like research itself, the design of your analysis can be broadly
classified into quantitative and qualitative.
Qualitative research
It determines relationships between collected data and observations based on mathematical
calculations. Statistical methods can prove or disprove theories related to a naturally existing
phenomenon. Researchers rely on qualitative research methods that conclude “why” a
particular theory exists and “what” respondents have to say about it.
Quantitative research
It is for cases where statistical conclusions to collect actionable insights are essential.
Numbers provide a better perspective for making critical business decisions. Quantitative
research methods are necessary for the growth of any organization. Insights drawn from
complex numerical data and analysis prove to be highly effective when making decisions
about the business’s future.
You can further break down the types of research design into five categories:
1. Descriptive: In a descriptive composition, a researcher is solely interested in describing
the situation or case under their research study. It is a theory-based design method created by
gathering, analyzing, and presenting collected data. This allows a researcher to provide
insights into the why and how of research. Descriptive design helps others better understand
the need for the research. If the problem statement is not clear, you can conduct exploratory
research.
2. Experimental: Experimental research establishes a relationship between the cause and
effect of a situation. It is a causal design where one observes the impact caused by the
independent variable on the dependent variable. For example, one monitors the influence of
an independent variable such as a price on a dependent variable such as customer satisfaction
or brand loyalty. It is an efficient research method as it contributes to solving a problem.
The independent variables are manipulated to monitor the change it has on the dependent
variable. Social sciences often use it to observe human behavior by analyzing two groups.
Researchers can have participants change their actions and study how the people around them
react to understand social psychology better.
3. Correlational research: Correlational research is a non-experimental research technique.
It helps researchers establish a relationship between two closely connected variables. There is
no assumption while evaluating a relationship between two other variables, and statistical
analysis techniques calculate the relationship between them. This type of research requires
two different groups.
A correlation coefficient determines the correlation between two variables whose values
range between -1 and +1. If the correlation coefficient is towards +1, it indicates a positive
relationship between the variables, and -1 means a negative relationship between the two
variables.
Literature Review
A literature review demonstrates your ability to research; it also showcases your expertise on
your chosen topic. By including a literature review in your project or thesis, you are also
providing your reader with the most prevalent theories and studies on your topic, evaluations
and comparisons of these studies, and gaps there may be in the literature. This helps your
reader understand your project/thesis better. It also makes you a more credible and reliable
author.
Definition - A literature review is a review or discussion of the current published material
available on a particular topic. It attempts to synthesize and evaluate the material and
information according to the research question(s), thesis, and central theme(s).
In other words, instead of supporting an argument, or simply making a list of summarized
research, a literature review synthesizes and evaluates the ideas of others on your given topic.
This allows your readers to know what is being said about your given topic, how these
sources compare with one another, and what gaps there are in the research.
Types of Literature Review -
1. Chronological – The research papers cited are organized by publication date or
history of topic. This type of review is useful if sequential order of events is
important.
2. Thematic – The research papers are organized by topic or issue, may still involve
chronology or an order of importance. This type is useful to go from general topic
themes to more specific (e.g., education to higher education to writing centers)
3. Methodological – In this type, the research papers are organized not by the content of
literature review material, but on the methods of the researcher/writer. Use this type if
the methods of the researchers/writers are the most important.
Summary, Synthesis, and Evaluation of literature review
Remember, to summarize means to recap the important information of the source; whereas,
to synthesize means to re-organize, re-shuffle, or re-interpret that information and involves
finding connections and relationships among your sources. Synthesizing research shows an
awareness of how research from different articles can be intertwined. Additionally, to
evaluate means to assess the worth of something. This means that while you are synthesizing
the information of a certain resource, be sure to also include an evaluation of that resource.
Parts of a Literature Review
A literature review is composed of three parts:
Introduction
o Keep it brief: most commonly only a paragraph long, but can go up to 1.5 pages.
o Introduce the larger subject.
o Narrow that larger subject into your manageable topic.
o Explain the significance of the topic.
o Formulate research question(s).
o Explain the scope of your coverage (what criteria was used to include or exclude
o studies and why).
o Lay out the organization of the review (forecasting statements).
Body
o Provide some background information (e.g. definition of concepts, historical
perspective(s) on the issue, etc.).
o Group the research according to themes, trends, approaches, etc.
o Summarize individual items with as much detail as merited (determined by its
comparative significance within your overall paper).
o Weave citations/descriptions of the literature with your analysis and show the
reader how this connects to your overall research question(s).
o Point out any methodological flaws, gaps in research, or inconsistencies in theory and
findings.
Conclusion
o Summarize major contributions of significant studies and articles to the body of
knowledge under review.
o Point out any gaps in the published literature and discuss areas or issues pertinent
to future study.
Design of experiment means how to design an experiment in the sense that how the
observations or measurements should be obtained to answer a query in a valid, efficient and
economical way. The designing of the experiment and the analysis of obtained data are
inseparable. If the experiment is designed properly keeping in mind the question, then the
data generated is valid and proper analysis of data provides the valid statistical inferences. If
the experiment is not well designed, the validity of the statistical inferences is questionable
and may be invalid. It is important to understand first the basic terminologies used in the
experimental design.
Experimental unit: For conducting an experiment, the experimental material is divided into
smaller parts and each part is referred to as an experimental unit. The experimental unit is
randomly assigned to treatment is the experimental unit. The phrase “randomly assigned” is
very important in this definition.
Experiment: A way of getting an answer to a question which the experimenter wants to
know.
Treatment: Different objects or procedures which are to be compared in an experiment are
called treatments.
Sampling unit: The object that is measured in an experiment is called the sampling unit. This
may be different from the experimental unit.
Factor: A factor is a variable defining a categorization. A factor can be fixed or random in
nature. A factor is termed as a fixed factor if all the levels of interest are included in the
experiment.
A factor is termed as a random factor if all the levels of interest are not included in the
experiment and those that are can be considered to be randomly chosen from all the levels of
interest.
Replication: It is the repetition of the experimental situation by replicating the experimental
unit.
Experimental error: The unexplained random part of the variation in any experiment is
termed as experimental error. An estimate of experimental error can be obtained by
replication.
Treatment design: A treatment design is the manner in which the levels of treatments are
arranged in an experiment.
Design of experiment:
One of the main objectives of designing an experiment is how to verify the hypothesis in an
efficient and economical way. In the contest of the null hypothesis of equality of several
means of normal populations having the same variances, the analysis of variance technique
can be used. Note that such techniques are based on certain statistical assumptions. If these
assumptions are violated, the outcome of the test of a hypothesis then may also be faulty and
the analysis of data may be meaningless. So the main question is how to obtain the data such
that the assumptions are met and the data is readily available for the application of tools like
analysis of variance. The designing of such a mechanism to obtain such data is achieved by
the design of the experiment. After obtaining the sufficient experimental unit, the treatments
are allocated to the experimental units in a random fashion. Design of experiment provides a
method by which the treatments are placed at random on the experimental units in such a way
that the responses are estimated with the utmost precision possible.
Factorial
Some experiments involve the study of the effects of multiple factors. For such studies, the
factorial experimental design is very useful. A full factorial design, also known as fully
crossed design, refers to an experimental design that consists of two or more factors, with
each factor having multiple discrete possible values or “levels”.
Using this design, all the possible combinations of factor levels can be investigated in each
replication. Although several factors can affect the variable being studied in factorial
experiments, this design specifically aims to identify the main effects and the interaction
effects among the different factors.
To understand the factorial experimental design, you must be well-acquainted with the
following terms:
Factors: This is a broad term used to describe the independent variable that is
manipulated in the experiment by the researcher or through selection.
Main Effects: The main effect of a factor refers to the change produced in response to a
change in the level of the factor. Therefore, the effect of factor A is the difference
between the average response at A1 and A2.
Interaction: An Interaction between factors occurs when the difference in response
between the levels of one factor is not the same at all the levels of the other factor.