Capstone2group12 - 13338 - 14149523 - Group 12 6 X57he 2

Major (Capstone) Design Experience Information
CE 020 CE Projects 2
2 Semester, SY 2021-2022
nd
Dela Cruz, John-Kenneth C.
Pepito, China Janel

Student/ Team Group 12
Raymundo, Joshua E.
Roquero, Robin Francis C.

A Proposed Design of Materials Recovery Facility in Tungkong Mangga, San
Project Title
Jose Del Monte, Bulacan
Program
Structural Engineering
Concentration Area
Constraints
Economic constraints involve the allocation of budget and resources for the
project. This constraint affects the functionality, quality, safety, functionality,
and performance of the project. Insufficient or ineffective budget and resource
allocation can have a negative impact on the development of the project.
Hence, the cost of the materials needs to be considered. The designers
imposed this constraint to examine that the cost of the project design is within
the budget set by the client while ensuring that the safety of the structure and
Economic Cost (Material the quality of the materials to be used is maintained.
Cost and Labor Cost)
The designers introduced several trade-offs to address this constraint while
keeping in mind the budget of the client. The trade-offs include the cross-
bracing system, v-bracing system, and chevron bracing system.
Limitations: The client estimates that the project would cost Php
15,000,000.00 only.
Constructability constraints refer to how the construction project can be

completed in an easy and efficient manner while still meeting the construction
codes and standards. Assessing potential construction obstacles and
providing solutions prevents possible construction errors, delays, and in turn,
higher construction costs. The designers imposed this constraint to ensure
Constructability (Duration that the project design will be cost-effective and time efficient.
in Days)
To address this constraint, the designers would use man-hours or days of
completion to evaluate which one among the trade-offs would produce the
shortest construction duration which would lessen the labor cost needed.
Limitations: The project's construction time should not exceed 150 days.
Sustainability Sustainability constraints refer to the use of resources in construction without

(Maintenance Cost) compromising the natural environment around the site. It also involves the
impact of the structure on the natural environment over its lifespan. Hence,
the maintenance cost of the structure is considered to prolong its lifespan.
The designers aim to design a sustainable structure. Hence, the designers

would assess which one among the trade-offs would be most resource
efficient in terms of maintenance cost for the structure in addressing this
constraint.
Limitations: The structure's design life must be at least 50 years.
Risk assessment is defined as the identification and evaluation of risk factors

that have the potential to cause harm and determining the measures to control
or eliminate said risks. This constraint is to ensure that the structure will be
able to sustain its stability and safety. The story drift is vital to be considered
in designing a structure to minimize the effects of the risks present.
The designers considered that the story drift is the main hazard to the
Risk Assessment (Story structure. This is due to earthquake loads and conditions which affects the
Drift) structural integrity of the MRF. As the structural integrity declines, the
occupants of the structure will be at risk. Thus, the designers aim to design a
structure that provides the least story drift.
Limitations: The structure story drift must not exceed the values (0.025 x
story height) prescribed in the National Structural Code of the Philippines
2015.
This constraint refers to the design safety percentages. It is considered a

hazardous activity working in construction sites such as working at heights.
Thus, this constraint determines factors of lateral displacement that may
cause an accident during construction and to conform the safety laws to
protect the lives of the workers. The designers must give an importance on
Safety the safeties of the employees and the construction site. The higher the
percentage the higher its structural safety.
Limitations: The structure's design safety percentage must be at least one

hundred percent (100%).
This constraint refers to the uncertainty percentages difference of story drift.

The possibility of earthquake is uncertain; thus, this constraint determines the
uncertainty percentage factor that the possibility of story displacement due to
earthquake might happen and cause accident. The designers must give an
importance on the safeties of the structure and the persons using it. The
Uncertainty higher the percentage the higher its uncertainty.
Limitations: The structure's uncertainty percentage shall not exceed a

hundred percent (100%).
Trade-offs
The Special Moment-Resisting Frame System, often known as the SMRF, is
a type of frame system that is designed to give ductile behavior. The ductility
of concrete is the ability of the material to flex without cracking under load.
Special Moment High confining pressures, high temperatures, and low strain rates all work
Resisting Frame together to make concrete more ductile. Beam, column, and beam-column
joints are designed to resist flexural and axial movements during intense
earthquake ground shaking, which necessitates the use of special moment-
resistant frames.
The diagonal members of the Chevron Bracing System form an inverted V

when they extend downward from the two topmost corners of a horizontal
SMRF with Chevron member and meet in the middle of the lower horizontal member. Use with a
Bracing Frame System compression brace substantially reduces it to less than the tension yield
(Longitudinal Axis) capacity of a tension brace when used in conjunction. Braces may have to be
resisted in the horizontal member's bending rather than the braces
themselves after their resistance capacity has been reached.
The X-Bracing is made up of two diagonal members that cross over one
another. Construction of braces from the right-hand corner of the ground up
to the left-hand corner of the ceiling, followed by a repetition of the process in
SMRF with Cross- the other direction, is a sort of structural reinforcement. As a result, an X-
Bracing System shaped brace is generated, which pulls the ground and ceiling against each
(Longitudinal Axis) other, increasing the structural stability of the structure overall. Structures that
have horizontal cross bracing installed on their faces, on the other hand, will
have problems with the location and operation of window openings.
Furthermore, it results in higher bending of floor beams as a result.
Standards
The National Structural Code of the Philippines establishes the rules,
National Structural Code minimum criteria, standards, and provisions for structural design. The code is
of the Philippines 2015 designed to protect community health and safety across the country through
(NSCP 2015) a variety of codes and regulations.
The National Building Code of the Philippines, which was also called as the
Presidential Decree No. 1096, was created to embody the modern
methodology on construction, maintenance and building design. The code
National Building Code of
issues the framework for the minimum standards and requirements to oversee
the Philippines
maintenance of the structure.
Based on local steel market conditions, design practices, and technologically

forced changes, this guide specifies the available steel sections, properties,
ASEP Steel Handbook and specifications for the construction of steel structures. It's also utilized as
Third Edition a design tool in the International System of Units (SI), which is consistent with
the National Structural Code of the Philippines.
The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is a worldwide
standards organization that develops and publishes voluntary consensus
American Society for
technical standards for a wide range of materials, products, systems, and
Testing and Materials
services. The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and the American
(ASTM)
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials were two significant
ASTM components.
The International Conference of Building Officials produces a series of codes
that are all associated with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) to give
jurisdictions with a comprehensive set of building-related regulations to adopt.
Uniform Building Code
The goal of the earthquake provisions and codes in this document is to protect
1997 (UBC) Chapter 16
against significant structural failures and loss of life, not to limit damage or
of Division IV;
retain function, but to minimize the amount of damage and casualties caused
Earthquake Design
by an earthquake.
The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) has devised a company-

level certification program for structural steel fabrication and construction.
Based on the codes supplied, the designers utilize AISC 360-16 LRFD to
AISC 360-16 LRFD
choose steel sections, steel connections, and assess the soundness of
structural elements.
ENGINEERING DESIGN PROJECT ASSESSMENT TOOL
Design Project Title: A Proposed Design of Materials Recovery Facility in Tungkong Mangga, San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan
Group Members: Dela Cruz, John-Kenneth C. Course Code: CE 020
Pepito, China Janel Course Title: CE Design Project 2
Raymundo, Joshua E. Sem./School Year: 2nd Sem / 2022
Scale
SOs Addressed by the
Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary Score
Course
1 2 3
Identify, formulate, and solve Identify an engineering The engineering problem The engineering problem The engineering problem 3
complex engineering problems problem and/or satisfy a need and/or need is unidentified and/or need is identified and/or need is clearly and
(student outcome b) specifically identified
Formulate engineering The engineering solution to The engineering solution to The engineering solution to 3
solutions to a given problem a given problem and/or a given problem and/or a given problem and/or
and/or need need is not formulated need is partly formulated need is correctly and
completely formulated
Solve the engineering problem The engineering problem The engineering problem The engineering problem 3
and/or satisfy the need and/or need is unsolved and/or need is solved by and/or need is innovatively
adopting existing solved by adopting new
technologies, systems, technologies, systems,
components, or processes components, or processes
and methods and methods
Solve complex engineering Apply appropriate constraints Less than three constraints Three constraints are More than three 2
problems by designing in the design process are applied in the design applied in the design appropriate constraints are
systems, components, or process process applied in the design
processes to meet process
specifications within realistic Apply appropriate standards Appropriate standards and Appropriate local Appropriate local and 2
constraints such as economic, and codes in the design codes are not applied in standards and codes are international standards and
environmental, cultural, social, process the design process applied in the design codes are applied in the
societal, political, ethical, process design process
health and safety, Use trade-offs to determine Less than three options Three options were used in More than three options 2
manufacturability, and final design choice were used in the trade-offs the trade-offs to determine were used in the trade-offs
sustainability in accordance to determine the final the final design choice to determine the final
with standards design choice design choice
(student outcome c)
Scale
Course
1 2 3
Use the techniques, skills, and Identify appropriate techniques, Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and 3
modern engineering tools skills, and modern engineering modern engineering tools modern engineering tools modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering tools necessary in the design are not clearly identified in are well identified in the are appropriately identified
practice in complex process the design process design process in the design process
engineering activities Use appropriate techniques, Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and Appropriate techniques, 3
(student outcome e) skills, and modern engineering modern engineering tools modern engineering tools skills, and modern
tools in the design process are not appropriately used are appropriately used in engineering tools are
in the design process the design process accurately used in the
design process
Apply principles of ethics and Demonstrate ethics by Design project submitted Design project submitted Design project submitted or 3
commit to professional ethics submitting or presenting a or presented does not cite or presented partly cited presented completely cited
and responsibilities design project that cites references references references
(student outcome h) references
Demonstrate professionalism Design project is not Design project is submitted Design project is submitted 3
by submitting or presenting the submitted or presented on or presented on schedule or presented ahead of
design projects on schedule as schedule as planned as planned schedule as planned
planned
Communicate effectively on Deliver effective oral 3
complex engineering activities presentations Use the mean score from the rubric for oral presentation of design projects
with various communities
including engineering experts Write a design project report 2.75
and society at large using that illustrates effective writing
appropriate levels of discourse Use the mean score from the rubric for design project report
in English
(student outcome j)
Total Score 32.75
90.97%
Evaluated by:
Engr. Bailey John Bandiola

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Signature over Printed Name
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT
Design Project A Proposed Design of Materials Recovery Facility in Tungkong Mangga, San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan
Title:
Roquero, Robin Francis C. Instructor: Engr. Jennifer I. Camino
Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to write a design project report that illustrates effective writing in English.
UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
Content (Substance) The report presents The report lacks The report presents 3
irrelevant relevant complete and relevant
data/information data/information data/information
Format The report does not The report follows some The report fully 3
follow the prescribed of the prescribed format complies with the
format prescribed format
Coherence (Logical flow of The report does not Some parts of the The whole report 3
discussion) present a logical flow of report present a logical presents a logical flow
discussion flow of discussion of discussion
Grammar, Spelling, Writing There are many There are occasional The report is free of 2
Mechanics (punctuation, grammatical and spelling errors and violations errors and violations
italics, capitalization, etc.) errors, and writing
mechanic violations
TOTAL SCORE 11
2.75
91.67%
Evaluated by:

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF DESIGN PROJECTS
Title:
Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to deliver effective oral presentation in English.

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
Delivery Presenter mumbles, Presenter speaks Presenter speaks 3

mispronounces terms, clearly and loud clearly and loud
and makes serious and enough to be heard by enough for all in the
persistent grammatical most of the audience; audience to hear;
errors throughout makes relatively few makes no grammatical
presentation. Presenter grammatical errors, errors, and pronounces
speaks too softly to be
and pronounces most all terms correctly and
heard by many in the
terms correctly. precisely.
audience.
Visual Aid There is no visual aid There is visual aid but Visual aid enhances 3
used during the oral does not enhance the presentation
presentation presentation
Organization There is no logical Presenter follows Presenter follows 3
sequence of logical sequence but logical sequence and
data/information fails to elaborate. provides explanations /
elaboration.
Content The presentation covers The presentation lacks The presentation 3
irrelevant relevant covers complete and
data/information data/information relevant
data/information
12
TOTAL SCORE
100%
Evaluated by:

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Scale
Course
1 2 3
health and safety, Use trade-offs to determine Less than three options Three options were used in More than three options 2
manufacturability, and final design choice were used in the trade-offs the trade-offs to determine were used in the trade-offs
(student outcome c)
Scale
Course
1 2 3
design process
Demonstrate professionalism Design project is not Design project is submitted Design project is submitted 3
by submitting or presenting the submitted or presented on or presented on schedule or presented ahead of
planned
Communicate effectively on Deliver effective oral 3
including engineering experts Write a design project report 3
in English
(student outcome j)
Total Score 32
88.89
Evaluated by:
Engr. Billy Rejuso

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Title:

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
mechanic violations
TOTAL SCORE 11
2.75
91.67
Evaluated by:
Engr. Billy Rejuso

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Title:

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3

audience.
elaboration.
data/information
11
TOTAL SCORE
2.75
91.67
Evaluated by:
Engr. Billy Rejuso

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Scale
Course
1 2 3
health and safety, Use trade-offs to determine Less than three options Three options were used in More than three options
manufacturability, and final design choice were used in the trade-offs the trade-offs to determine were used in the trade-offs 2
(student outcome c)
Scale
Course
1 2 3
design process
Demonstrate professionalism Design project is not Design project is submitted Design project is submitted
by submitting or presenting the submitted or presented on or presented on schedule or presented ahead of 2
planned
Communicate effectively on Deliver effective oral 2.5
including engineering experts Write a design project report 2.5
in English
(student outcome j)
Total Score 28
77.78%
Evaluated by:
Engr. Cris Edward Monjardin

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Title:

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
mechanic violations
TOTAL SCORE 10
2.5
83.33%
Evaluated by:

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Title:

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3

audience.
elaboration.
data/information
10
TOTAL SCORE
2.5
83.33%
Evaluated by:

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Scale
SOs Addressed by the Course Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary Score
1 2 3
complex engineering problems problem and/or satisfy a and/or need is unidentified and/or need is identified and/or need is clearly and
(student outcome b) need specifically identified
Solve the engineering The engineering problem The engineering problem The engineering problem 3
problem and/or satisfy the and/or need is unsolved and/or need is solved by and/or need is innovatively
need adopting existing solved by adopting new
Solve complex engineering Apply appropriate Less than three constraints Three constraints are More than three 2
problems by designing systems, constraints in the design are applied in the design applied in the design appropriate constraints are
components, or processes to meet process process process applied in the design
specifications within realistic process
constraints such as economic, Apply appropriate standards Appropriate standards and Appropriate local standards Appropriate local and 3
environmental, cultural, social, and codes in the design codes are not applied in the and codes are applied in international standards
societal, political, ethical, health process design process the design process and codes are applied in
and safety, manufacturability, and the design process
sustainability in accordance with Use trade-offs to determine Less than three options Three options were used in More than three options 3
standards final design choice were used in the trade-offs the trade-offs to determine were used in the trade-offs
(student outcome c) to determine the final the final design choice to determine the final
design choice design choice
Scale
SOs Addressed by the Course Performance Indicators Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Exemplary Score
1 2 3
Use the techniques, skills, and Identify appropriate Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and 2
modern engineering tools techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools modern engineering tools modern engineering tools
necessary for engineering practice modern engineering tools are not clearly identified in are well identified in the are appropriately identified
in complex engineering activities necessary in the design the design process design process in the design process
(student outcome e) process
Use appropriate techniques, Techniques, skills, and Techniques, skills, and Appropriate techniques, 3
skills, and modern modern engineering tools modern engineering tools skills, and modern
engineering tools in the are not appropriately used are appropriately used in engineering tools are
design process in the design process the design process accurately used in the
design process
Apply principles of ethics and Demonstrate ethics by Design project submitted Design project submitted Design project submitted 3
commit to professional ethics and submitting or presenting a or presented does not cite or presented partly cited or presented completely
responsibilities design project that cites references references cited references
Demonstrate Design project is not Design project is submitted Design project is 3
professionalism by submitted or presented on or presented on schedule submitted or presented
submitting or presenting the schedule as planned as planned ahead of schedule as
design projects on schedule planned
as planned
Communicate effectively on Deliver effective oral 2.5
complex engineering activities with presentations Use the mean score from the rubric for oral presentation of design projects
various communities including
engineering experts and society at Write a design project report
2.75
large using appropriate levels of that illustrates effective Use the mean score from the rubric for design project report
discourse (student outcome j) writing in English
Total Score 33.25
92.36
Evaluated by:
Engr. Jennifer I. Camino
______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Title:

CRITERIA SCORE
1 2 3
Format The report does not The report follows The report fully 3
follow the prescribed some of the prescribed complies with the
format format prescribed format
Mechanics (punctuation, grammatical and errors and violations errors and violations
italics, capitalization, etc.) spelling errors, and
writing mechanic
violations
TOTAL SCORE 11
2.75
91.67
Evaluated by:

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
Title:

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY SCORE
CRITERIA
1 2 3
Delivery Presenter mumbles, Presenter speaks clearly and Presenter speaks clearly and 2
mispronounces terms, and loud enough to be heard by loud enough for all in the
makes serious and persistent most of the audience; makes audience to hear; makes no
grammatical errors throughout
relatively few grammatical grammatical errors and
presentation. Presenter
speaks too softly to be heard errors and pronounces most pronounces all terms
by many in the audience. terms correctly. correctly and precisely.
Visual Aid There is no visual aid used There is visual aid but does Visual aid enhances 3
during the oral presentation not enhance the presentation presentation
Organization There is no logical sequence of Presenter follows logical Presenter follows logical 3
data/information sequence but fails to sequence and provides
elaborate. explanations / elaboration.
Content The presentation covers The presentation lacks The presentation covers 2
irrelevant data/information relevant data/information complete and relevant
data/information
Total Score 10
2.5
83.33
Evaluated by:

______________________________________ April 21, 2022
Date: _________________________________
RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE
(Engineering Programs)
2018 - T.I.P. SO 1 identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying knowledge and principles of engineering, science, and mathematics
2021 - T.I.P. SO 1 identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying knowledge and principles of engineering, science, and mathematics.
Complex Engineering Problems - Complex engineering problems include one or more of the following characteristics: involving wide-ranging or conflicting technical
issues, having no obvious solution, addressing problems not encompassed by current standards and codes, involving diverse groups of stakeholders, including many
component parts or sub-problems, involving multiple disciplines, or having significant consequences in a range of contexts.
BS in Civil Engineering CE Design Project 2 CE42S3 2nd 2021-2022

Program: ___________ Course: _______________ Section: _____________ ____Semester School Year ____________
Performance Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent

1 2 3 4 5 6 Score
Indicators
1. identify complex engineering The student does The student The student The student The student The student
problems by applying knowledge not able to identify partially identifies somehow identifies identifies complex identifies complex completely
and principles of engineering, the complex complex complex engineering engineering identifies the
science, and mathematics engineering engineering engineering problems by problems by complex
problems problems with no problems with little applying applying adequate engineering
application of application of fundamental knowledge and problems by
knowledge and knowledge and knowledge and principles of applying an in-
principles of principles of principles of engineering, depth knowledge
engineering, engineering, engineering, science, and and principles of
science, and science, and science, and mathematics engineering,
mathematics mathematics mathematics science, and
mathematics
2. formulate engineering solutions in The student does The student The student The student The student The student
solving complex engineering not formulate formulates formulates less than formulates formulates sufficient formulates
problems by applying knowledge engineering inadequate adequate adequate engineering comprehensive
and principles of engineering, solutions in solving engineering engineering engineering solutions in solving engineering
science, and mathematics complex solutions in solving solutions in solving solutions in solving complex solutions in solving
engineering complex complex complex engineering complex
problems engineering engineering engineering problems by engineering
problems problems by problems by applying relevant problems by
applying limited applying relevant and appropriate applying highly
knowledge and knowledge and knowledge and relevant and
principles of principles of principles of appropriate
engineering, engineering, engineering, knowledge and
science, and science, and science, and principles of
mathematics, and mathematics, and mathematics, and engineering,
modern tools modern tools modern tools science, and
mathematics, and
modern tools
Approaches in The student uses a The student uses an The student uses The student uses The student uses The student uses
3. solve complex solving complex wrong approach in approach in solving approaches in solving multiple approaches multiple approaches multiple approaches
engineering engineering solving complex complex engineering complex engineering in solving complex in solving complex in solving complex
problems by problems. engineering problems and lacks problems and needs engineering problems engineering problems engineering problems
problems. details for the further discussion to with presentation of correctly with brief correctly with
applying
discussion of the support such the models/ discussions of the comprehensive
knowledge and approach approach calculations/solutions models/ discussions of the
principles of . calculations/solutions. models/
engineering, calculations/solutions.
science, and
mathematics. Application of The student does not The student wrongly The student applies The student applies The student applies The student applies
appropriate apply the appropriate applies the some mathematical, some mathematical, all appropriate all appropriate
mathematical, mathematical, appropriate science, and science, and mathematical, mathematical,
science, and science, and mathematical, engineering principles engineering science, and science, and
engineering engineering principles science, and but does not arrive at principles with correct engineering principles engineering principles
principles in in solving complex engineering principles the correct answer in answers in solving to solve the problem to solve the problem
solving complex engineering problems in solving complex solving complex complex engineering with correct answers with correct answers
engineering . engineering problems engineering problems problems with brief in solving complex with proper and
problems . . discussions engineering problems validated
. explanations in
solving complex
engineering problems
Total Score
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 24) x 100
Evaluated by:
Engr. Jennifer I. Cam

ino ay 21, 2022
M
Printed Name and Signature of Faculty Member Date
RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN

(ENGINEERING PROGRAMS)
2018 - T.I.P. SO 2. apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety,
welfare, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors, in accordance with standards appropriate to the discipline.
2021 - T.I.P. SO 2. apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety,
welfare, global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors
BS in Civil Engineering Course: CE

Program: ___________________ CE42S3
Design Project 2 Section: _______________
_______________ 2nd Semester School Year ____________
______ 2021-2022

Score
Indicator 1 2 3 4 5 6
Identify a problem and The student is The student is The student can The student was able The student was able The student was able
formulate engineering totally unable to unable to identify identify engineering to identify to validate identified to comprehensively
solutions and/or satisfy a identify engineering engineering problem and/or need engineering problem problem and/or need validate identified
problem and/or problem and/or and minimally and/or need and and formulated problem and/or need
need
need need and formulated formulate engineering solution and formulated
and formulate formulate engineering solutions engineering solutions engineering solution
engineering engineering
solutions solutions
Use trade-offs to The student did not The student apply The student apply The student apply The student apply The student apply
determine final design apply trade-offs trade-offs trade-offs analysis in trade-offs analysis in trade-offs analysis in trade-offs analysis in
choice and did not use analysis in two three design options three design options more than three more than three
sensitivity analysis design options but did not use the and use sensitivity design options and design options with
in determining the but did not use sensitivity analysis analysis in use sensitivity sub-design and use
best design choice the sensitivity in determining the determining the best analysis in sensitivity analysis in
analysis in best design choice design choice determining the best determining the best
determining the design choice design choice
best design
choice
Consider public health, The student was The student The student was able The student was able The student was able The student was able
safety, welfare, global, not able to partially to considered public to considered public to considered public to considered public
cultural, considered public considered public health, safety, health, safety, health, safety, health, safety,
social,environmental and health, safety, health, safety, welfare, global, welfare, global, welfare, global, welfare, global,
economic factors welfare, global, welfare, global, cultural, cultural, cultural, cultural,
cultural, cultural, social,environmental social,environmental social,environmental, social,environmental,
social,environment social,environme and economic and economic economic, and economic and more
al and economic ntal and constraints however constraints with additional one than one (1)
constraints in the economic fail to provide evidences that these constraint with additional constraints
design solution constraints in the evidences that these constraints were evidences that these with evidences that
design solutions constraints were considered in the constraints were these constraints
and fail to provide considered in the design solution considered in the were considered in
evidences that design solution design solution the design solution
these are
considered in the
design solution
Apply appropriate Student is fully not Student is not Student is minimally Student is compliant Student is compliant Student is fully
standards and codes in compliant in compliant in compliant in applying with a certain extent in applying compliant in applying
the design process applying applying appropriate in applying appropriate appropriate
appropriate appropriate standards and codes appropriate standards and codes standards and codes
standards and standards and in the design process standards and codes in the design process in the design process
codes in the design codes in the in the design process
process design process
Total Score
Evaluated by:
Engr. Jennifer I. Cam ino

_________________________________________ ay 21, 2022
M
_____________________
RUBRIC FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

2018 - T.I.P. SO 3. communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with various communities including engineering experts and
society at large using appropriate levels of discourse.
2021 - T.I.P. SO 3. communicate effectively and inclusively on complex engineering activities with a range of audiences, such as being
able to comprehend, write and present in a variety of ways effectively considering cultural, language, and learning differences.
China Janel Pepito, John-Kenneth Dela Cruz, Joshua Raym

Name of Student: ______________________________________________ undo, Robin Francis Roquero
BS in Civil Engineering Course: _______________

Program: ____________________ CE42S3
CE Design Project 2 Section: _______________ 2nd Semester School Year _________
______ 2021-2022
Performance Sub- Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent Score
Indicators performance 1 2 3 4 5 6
Indicator
Ability to communicate Comprehension on The student provides The student The student provides The student provides The student provides The student provides
effectively and complex engineering inaccurate and provides few basic some basic adequate appropriate exceptional, accurate,
inclusively on complex activities irrelevant information and information and has a information, information, and relevant information,
engineering activities information, has little vague understanding demonstrates basic demonstrates full demonstrates in-depth
with a range of lacks understanding understanding of of complex understanding of understanding and understanding and
audiences by being and insight on complex engineering activities. complex engineering some insight on insight, exhibits
able to comprehend in complex engineering engineering activities. complex engineering careful and thorough
a variety of ways activities. activities. activities. research on complex
considering cultural, engineering activities.
language, and learning
differences
Ability to communicate Problem Statement The student has no The student has The student has a The student has The student has a The student has a well-
effectively and or purpose problem statement or irrelevant problem weak problem stated a relevant well-stated problem stated problem
inclusively on complex purpose. statement or statement or purpose problem statement or statement or purpose statement or purpose
engineering activities purpose purpose with supporting
with a range of information or rationale
audiences by being
able to write in a variety Expression of ideas The student has not The student has The student has The student has The student has well- The student has well-
of ways considering expressed the ideas ideas which are ideas, which are described ideas, described ideas, described the ideas,
and has no irrelevant weakly developed which are generally which are clearly which are clearly
cultural, language, and supporting details. and expressed. developed and developed and developed and
learning differences expressed. expressed. expressed, with
appropriate details.
Illustrations to The student has no The student has The student has The student has The student has The student has
support the core illustrations to provided unrelated, provided few provided adequate provided complete provided complete
messages support the core and confusing illustrations that illustrations to illustrations to support illustrations to support
messages and some illustrations that support the core support the core the core messages. the core messages
are mislabeled support the core messages. messages. which are properly
messages. labeled and captioned.
Conclusion and The student has not The student has The student has The student has The student has The student has
summary provided a provided a provided relevant but provided some provided a complete provided a complete,
conclusion or conclusion or incomplete relevant conclusion and relevant relevant, and well-
summary. summary which are conclusions or or summary. conclusion or structured conclusion or
irrelevant. summary. summary. summary.
List of references The student has not The student has The student has The student has The student has The student has
provided a list of provided a list of provided a list of provided a list of provided a list of all provided a thorough and
references irrelevant some relevant most relevant relevant references. complete list of relevant
references. references. references. references.
Ability to communicate Confidence in The student lacks The student shows The student is The student is The student is The student has full
effectively and presenting the topic confidence in little confidence in somehow confident in adequately confident confident in confidence in presenting
inclusively on complex presenting the topic presenting the presenting the topic in presenting the presenting the topic the topic
engineering activities topic topic
with a range of
audiences by being Coherence and The student lacks The student shows The student The student provides The student provides The student
able to present in a consistency coherence and little coherence and somehow coherent adequate coherent sufficient demonstrates
variety of ways consistency in consistency in and consistent in and consistent consistent and persuasive, consistent,
considering cultural, providing statements providing providing statements statements with coherent statements and coherent statements
language, and learning statements observance of with good speaking and strong speaking
differences speaking voice voice voice which are easily
understood by the
audience
Energy and The student does not The student shows The student The student shows The student shows The student shows
enthusiasm show energy and little energy and somehow shows adequate energy and sufficient energy and dynamic energy and
enthusiasm through enthusiasm energy and enthusiasm through enthusiasm through high level of enthusiasm
physical gesture and through physical enthusiasm through physical gesture and physical gesture and through physical gesture
facial expression gesture and facial physical gesture and facial expression facial expression and facial expression
expression facial expression
Total Score
Percentage rating = (Total Score/54) x 100
Evaluated by:

_________________________________________ ay 21, 2022
M
_____________________
RUBRIC FOR ETHICS

( ENGINEERING PROGRAMS)
2018 - T.I.P. SO 4. recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the
impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts.
2021 - T.I.P. SO 4. ability to apply principles of ethics and commit to professional ethics, technology ethics, data ethics, global responsibilities, and
norms of engineering practice; and adhere to relevant national and international laws. Comprehend the need for diversity and inclusion. Recognize
ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the sustainability impact of
engineering solutions in human, cultural, global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts
Nam
e: China Janel Pepito, John-Kenneth Dela Cruz, Joshua Raym undo, Robin Francis Roquero
BS in Civil Engineering CE Design Project 2 CE42S3
Program: ___________________ Course: __________________ Section: _________________ 2nd Semester School Year ________________
________ 2021-2022
Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent

Performance Indicators Score
1 2 3 4 5 6
4.1An ability to Apply principles of Student is fully not Student is not Student is Student is compliant Student is compliant Student is fully
apply principles ethics and comply compliant with compliant with minimally to a certain extent with with professional compliant with
of ethics and with professional professional professional compliant with professional ethics and follow professional
commit to Ethics, Technology ethics, technology ethics,technology professional ethics,technology technology ethics ethics, technology
professional Ethics and Data ethics, and data ethics, and data ethics,technology ethics, and data ethics and data ethics ethics, and data
ethics, Ethics. ethics ethics ethics, and data ethics
technology ethics
ethics, data Adopt global Student is fully not Student is not able Student is able to Student is able to Student is able to Student is fully
ethics, global responsibilities and able to adopt to adopt global minimally adopt adopt to a certain adopt global able to adopt
responsibilities, norms of global responsibilities and global extent global responsibilities and global
and norms of engineering responsibilities and norms of responsibilities and responsibilities and norms of responsibilities and
engineering practice norms of engineering norms of norms of engineering engineering practice norms of
practice; and engineering practice engineering practice engineering
adhere to practice practice practice
relevant Adhere to relevant Student is fully not Student is not Student is Student is adherent to Student is adherent Student is fully
national and national and adherent to adherent to minimally a certain extent to to relevant national adherent to
international international laws relevant national relevant national adherent to relevant national and and international relevant national
laws and international and international relevant national international laws laws and international
laws laws and international laws
laws
4.2An ability to Student does not Student does not Student minimally Student understands Student understands Student fully
comprehend totally understand understand the understands the to a certain extent the the need for diversity understands the
the need for the need for need for diversity need for diversity need for diversity and and inclusion need for diversity
diversity and diversity and and inclusion and inclusion inclusion and inclusion
inclusion inclusion
4.3An ability to ability to recognize Student does not Student does not Student minimally Student recognizes to Student recognizes Student fully
recognize ethical and totally recognize recognize ethical recognizes ethical a certain extent ethical ethical and recognizes ethical
ethical and professional ethical and and professional and professional and professional professional and professional
professional responsibilities in professional responsibilities in responsibilities in responsibilities in responsibilities in responsibilities in
responsibilities engineering responsibilities in engineering engineering engineering situations engineering engineering
in engineering situations engineering situations situations situations situations
situations and situations
make informed ability to make Student is totally Student is unable Student can Student makes Student makes Student fully
judgments informed unable to make to make informed minimally make informed judgments informed judgments makes informed
which must judgments which informed judgments which informed to a certain extent which must consider judgments which
consider the must consider the judgments which must consider the judgments which which must consider the sustainability must consider the
sustainability sustainability must consider the sustainability must consider the the sustainability impact of sustainability
impact of impact of sustainability impact of sustainability impact of engineering engineering impact of
engineering engineering impact of engineering impact of solutions in human, solutions in human, engineering
solutions in solutions in engineering solutions in engineering cultural, global, cultural, global, solutions in
human, cultural, human, cultural, solutions in human, cultural, solutions in economic, economic, human, cultural,
global, global, economic, human, cultural, global, economic, human, cultural, environmental, and environmental, and global, economic,
economic, environmental, and global, economic, environmental, and global, economic, societal contexts societal contexts environmental, and
environmental, societal contexts environmental, and societal contexts environmental, and societal contexts
and societal societal contexts societal contexts
contexts
Total Score
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 36) x 100%
Evaluated by:

_______________________________________ M
a y 21, 2022
_____________
RUBRIC FOR INDIVIDUAL AND TEAMWORK

2018 - T.I.P. SO 5.function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive
environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives by applying knowledge of engineering and management principles.
2021 - T.I.P. SO 5. function effectively as an individual member in diverse and inclusive teams and/or leader who provide leadership,
create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives in multi-disciplinary and long-distance
settings by applying knowledge of engineering and management principles

Program: ___________________ CE42S3
______ 2021-2022

Score
Ability to function Student does not Student functions Student functions Student functions often Student always Student initiates to
effectively as an function as an rarely as an occasionally as an as an individual functions as an function effectively
individual member in individual member in individual member in individual member in member in diverse and individual member as an individual
diverse and inclusive diverse and inclusive diverse and inclusive diverse and inclusive inclusive teams and/or in diverse and member in diverse
teams and/or leader teams and/or leader teams and/or leaders teams and/or leaders leaders who provide inclusive teams and inclusive teams
who provide who provide who provide who provide leadership. and/or leaders who and/or leader who
leadership leadership. leadership. leadership provide leadership. provide leadership
beyond expectation
Ability to create a Student is not able to Student rarely Student occasionally Student often Student always Student always
collaborative and participate in creating participates in participates in participates in creating participate in initiates the
inclusive a collaborative and creating a creating a a collaborative and creating a participation in
environment inclusive collaborative and collaborative and inclusive environment collaborative and creating a
environment inclusive inclusive inclusive collaborative and
environment. environment. environment inclusive
environment beyond
expectation
Ability to establish Student is not able to Student is able to Student is able to Student is able to Student is able to Student is able to
goals, plan tasks, establish goals, plan establish few goals, establish some establish most goals, establish all goals, initiate the
and meet objectives tasks, and meet plan tasks, and meet goals, plan tasks, plan tasks, and meet plan tasks, and establishment of all
in multi-disciplinary, objectives in multi- objectives in multi- and meet objectives objectives in multi- meet objectives in other related goals,
multicultural, and disciplinary, and disciplinary, and in multi-disciplinary, disciplinary, and long- multi-disciplinary, plan tasks, and meet
long-distance setting long-distance setting long-distance setting and long-distance distance setting by and long-distance objectives in multi-
by applying y applying y applying setting by applying applying knowledge of setting by applying disciplinary, and
knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of engineering and knowledge of long-distance
engineering and engineering and engineering and engineering and management engineering and setting by applying
management management management management principles management knowledge of
principles principles principles principles principles engineering and
management
principles
Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score / 3)
Percentage Rating = (Total Score / 18) x 100%
Evaluated by:

_________________________________________ ay 21, 2022
M
_____________________
RUBRIC FOR CONDUCT OF EXPERIMENTS

2018 - T.I.P. SO 6. develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw
conclusions
2021 - T.I.P. SO 6. develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw
conclusions.

Program: ___________________ CE42S3
______ 2021-2022

Score
develop appropriate The students are The students are The students are The students are The students are The students are
experimentation unable to develop able to partially able to develop able to develop a able to develop able to develop a
a basic develop component of a basic component of components of a lab
component of a components of a laboratory a laboratory laboratory experiment/activity
laboratory laboratory experiment but experiment (i.e. experiment appropriate to the
experiment. experiment. has no title, outcome, brief appropriate to the chosen topic and
presentations of discussion of chosen topic and aligned to the
analysis of data concepts, materials aligned to the engineering
yet has presented needed, engineering principles learned
conclusion or procedures/ principles learned in the previous
recommendation instructions, data in the previous experiments. The
results/analysis/inte experiments developed lab
rpretation, experiment/activity
summary/conclusio has a complete
n/recommendation) presentation of
appropriate to the block/schematic
chosen topic diagram, provided
the use of modern
tools and
techniques, and
integrated
principles/discussio
ns that were based
on proven studies.
conduct appropriate The students are The students The students conduct The students conduct The students are The students are
experimentation unable to conduct inappropriately some laboratory laboratory able to conduct able to conduct a
a laboratory conduct the experiments/activities experiment/activity with
laboratory but did not arrive at correct appropriate precise laboratory
experiment/activity. laboratory experiment/activity
experiment/activity. the correct results methods/procedures
. but insufficient results experiment/activity with excellent
. to draw conclusion with sufficient results and
results and able conclusions. The
draw a valid developed lab
conclusion experiment/activity
has a complete
presentation of
block/schematic
diagram, provided
the use of modern
tools and
techniques, and
integrated
principles/discussio
ns that were based
on proven studies.
The students failed The students are Develop a protocol to
to determine the able to determine conduct an Members follow
objectives of the the objectives of experiment good and safe
experiment or test the experiment or exceeding the laboratory practice
to be performed. test to be requirements
at all times in the
performed but fail
to identify r
conduct of
experiments.
Ability to analyze and The students are The students The students The students use The students use The students use
interpret data unable to provide provide provide limited appropriate data adequate data multiple data
analysis and irrelevant and analysis of data analysis analysis techniques analysis techniques
interpretation of inaccurate with no techniques. Data appropriate for data appropriate for data
data. analysis and interpretation. analysis is reported collected, collected,
interpretation of with insufficient informative with informative with
data. interpretation. respect to the respect to the
experimentation/act experimentation/act
ivity being ivity being
conducted. Data conducted. Data
analysis is reported analysis is reported
with sufficient with
interpretation. comprehensive
interpretation.
Use engineering The student The student was The student was The student was The student was The student was
judgment to draw failed to use able to use able to use able to use able to use able to use
conclusions engineering engineering engineering engineering engineering engineering
judgement to judgement judgement judgement judgement more judgement* more
draw conclusions. but but insufficient to sufficient to draw than sufficient to than sufficient to
inappropriate draw correct correct draw correct draw correct
for the topic and conclusions. conclusions. conclusions. conclusions and
failed to draw was able to
correct provide new
conclusions. insights.
*
Total Score
Evaluated by:
_________________________________________ ay 21, 2022
M
_____________________
RUBRIC FOR LIFELONG LEARNING

2018 - T.I.P. SO 7. acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies.
2021 - T.I.P. SO 7. acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies to engage in independent and life-long learning,
creativity and adaptability to new and emerging technologies, and critical thinking in the broadest context of technological change.
BS in Civil Engineering Course: __________________

Program: ___________________ CE Design Project 2 CE42S3
Section: ___________________ 2nd Semester School Year ________________
________ 2021-2022

Score
Indicators 1 2 3 4 5 6
Educational interests
Educational interests
and pursuits exist and
Look beyond and pursuits exist and
Begins to look flourish outside
1. Acquire and classroom flourish outside
No initiative or beyond classroom classroom
apply new requirements, classroom
interest in Relies on classroom requirements, requirements,
knowledge from showing interest requirements,
acquiring new instruction only showing interest in knowledge and/or
outside sources in pursuing knowledge and/or
knowledge pursuing knowledge experiences are
knowledge experiences are
independently pursued independently
independently pursued independently
and applies knowledge
learned into practice
Completes an
2. Learn Requires detailed or Requires minimal Completes an
No interest to Shows little interest to assigned task
independently step-by-step guidance to assigned task without
complete a task complete a task independently and
instructions to complete an supervision or
independently independently practices continuous
complete a task assigned task guidance
improvement
Synthesizes and
3. Critical thinking Analyze
Gather and Apply the integrates information
in the broadest information from a Evaluate information
Gather summarized the from a variety of
context of gathered variety of from a variety of
information from information from a sources; formulates a
information to sources; sources; formulates a
technological a variety of variety of sources but clear and precise
formulate the formulates a clear clear and precise
change sources failed to formulate the perspective; draws
problem and precise perspective.
problem appropriate
perspective.
conclusions
Ideas are combined in

4. Creativity and original and creative
Ideas are creative and
adaptability to Ideas are copied Shows initiative and ways in line with the
Shows some Ideas are creative adapt the new
new and or restated from attempt to develop new and emerging
creative ways to in solving a knowledge to solve a
the sources creative ideas to solve technology trends to
emerging solve the problem problem, or problem or address an
consulted the problem solve a problem or
technologies address an issue issue
address an issue.
Total Score
Rating = (Total Score / 24) x 100
Evaluated by:
Engr. Jennifer I. Cam
ino
_________________________________________ ay 21, 2022
M
_____________________
938 Aurora Boulevard, Cubao, Quezon City
A Project in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements in
CE 020
CE Design Project 2
A PROPOSED DESIGN OF MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY

IN TUNGKONG MANGGA, SAN JOSE DEL MONTE, BULACAN
Prepared By:
Group 12
Members:
Dela Cruz, John Kenneth C.
Pepito, China Janel
Raymundo, Joshua E.
CE42S3
2nd Semester, S.Y. 2021-2022
Submitted to:
Instructor
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The following persons have helped in one way or another to make this design feasible, and we owe them our
sincere gratitude for their assistance and support.
First and first, we give gratitude and praise to God Almighty for providing us with the knowledge, wisdom,
strength, support, and blessings we needed to complete our design. And for your leadership in guiding us
through all our challenges and providing us the resolve to complete our Capstone design project.
Second, we'd want to offer our heartfelt appreciation to Engr. Jennifer Camino, our Capstone Design 2
Instructor, for passing on her expertise of how to properly write and present a manuscript, for advising us on
how to choose the suitable title and theme for our design project, and for examining the structure and content
of our design meticulously.
Third, we want to express our profound gratitude to our external advisers, Engr. Neilsen T. Campit and
Engr. Ferdinand Anis. Thank you for your unwavering support of our design. We have been tremendously
moved by their patience, motivation, passion, vision, honesty, and vast expertise. Working and designing
under their direction was a real honor and privilege.
Finally, we'd like to express our gratitude to our Panel Members: Engr. Bailey John Bandiola, Engr. Billy
Rejuso, and Engr. Cris Edward Monjardin for donating their time during the defense of our design project,
for offering corrections, thoughts, and comments to improve our work, and for being courteous and worried
about our safety and wellbeing.
Finally, we are grateful to our families for their love, care, understanding, and sacrifices in educating and
preparing us for our future. For their moral and spiritual support in helping us complete our plan. This design
would not be possible without them.
iii
ABSTRACT
While there is an existing law being implemented in the Philippines regarding the proper management of
waste, specifically RA No. 9003 or the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, the Philippines still places
fourth amongst ASEAN countries that generates approximately 14, 660, 000 tons of public solid waste per
year. According to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), there are 189 established
sanitary landfills and open dumpsites built in the country. However, due to the scarcity of regulated dumpsites
and sanitary landfills, public dumping remains the most common method of garbage disposal in the nation.
Meanwhile, Region 3, where the subject of the study is located (the Province of Bulacan), produces 3,890.12
tons of waste per day ranking third among the Regions nationwide. In this region, there are only twelve (12)
sanitary landfills available making it difficult to accommodate the increasing volume of wastes. In this regard,
this project aims to provide a plan of Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) in Tungkong Mangga, San Jose Del
Monte City, Bulacan by providing a design structure constructed on engineering procedures and codes,
investigating and comparison of trade-offs based on the constraints of the client such as economic,
constructability, sustainability, risk, safety, and uncertainty to enable productive and systematic movement
and processing of materials storage and composed separated wastes. In particular, this paper will design an
architectural and structural plan of a Materials Recovery Facility using various software incorporating the
standard specifications and codes established by the National Structural Code of the Philippines Volume II,
National Building Code of the Philippines and DENR policies and practices. Moreover, this study will evaluate
and establish trade- difficulties through the Normalization Method of constraints provided.
The three trade-offs are Special Moment Resisting Frames, SMRF with Chevron Bracing (Longitudinal Axis),
and SMRF with Cross-Bracing (Longitudinal Axis) in which all are analyzed using the Staad Pro Connect
Edition. The winning trade-off is the SMRF with Cross Bracing System since it is the most economical and
has low value of maintenance cost without compromising its structural integrity.
iv
ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND NOTATIONS
ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations
ASEP Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BSWM Bureau of Soil and Water Management
CSJDM City of San Jose Del Monte
DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources
LGUs Local Government Units
MRF Materials Recovery Facility
MSW Municipal Solid Waste
NBCP National Building Code of the Philippines
NSCP National Structural Code of the Philippines
SMRF Special Moment Resisting Frame
UNEP United Nations Environment Program
WBG World Bank Group
= gross area of section, mm2.

= area of nonprestressed tension reinforcement, mm2.
= minimum amount of flexural reinforcement, mm2.
= total area of nonprestressed longitudinal reinforcement (bars and steel shapes), mm 2.
= area of shear reinforcement within a distance s, mm2.
= area of shear-friction reinforcement, mm2.
= area of compression reinforcement, mm2.
= width of compression face of member, mm.
= web width, mm.
= distance from extreme compression fiber to neutral axis, mm.
= clear cover from the nearest surface in tension to the surface of the flexural tension reinforcement, mm.
= a factor relating actual moment diagram to an equivalent uniform moment diagram.
= dead loads, or related internal moments and forces.
= distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of tension reinforcement, mm.
= distance from extreme compression fiber to centroid of compression reinforcement, mm.
= nominal diameter of bar, wire, or prestressing strand, mm.
= thickness of concrete cover measure from extreme tension fiber to center of bar or wire located closest
thereto, mm.
= distance from extreme tension fiber to centroid of tension reinforcement, mm.
= distance from extreme compression fiber to extreme tension steel, mm.
= load effects of earthquake, or related internal moments and forces.
= modulus of elasticity of concrete, MPa.
= modulus of elasticity of reinforcement, MPa.
= flexural stiffness of compression member, N-mm2.
v
= loads due to weight and pressures of fluids with well defined densities and controllable maximum
heights, or related internal moments and forces.
= specified compressive strength of concrete, MPa.
= specified yield strength of nonprestressed reinforcement, MPa.
= specified yield strength fy
= loads due to weight and pressure of soil, water in soil, or other materials, or related internal moments
and forces.
= overall thickness of member, mm.
= moment of inertia of section beam about the centroidal axis, mm4.
= moment of inertia of cracked section transformed to concrete, mm4.
= effective moment of inertia for computation of deflection, mm4.
= moment of inertia of gross concrete section about centroidal axis, neglecting reinforcement, mm4.
= live loads, or related internal moments and forces.
= development length, mm.
= length of clear span measured face-to-face of supports, mm.
= maximum moment in member at stage deflection is computed.
= cracking moment. See Equation 409-9.
= nominal axial load strength at balanced strain conditions
= nominal axial load strength at given eccentricity.
= nominal shear strength provided by concrete
= wind load, or related integral moments and forces.
= unit weight of concrete, kN/m3.
= factored load per unit length of beam or per unit area of slab.
= ratio of flexural stiffness of beam section to flexural stiffness of a width of slab bounded laterally by
center line of adjacent panle, if any on each side of beam.
= average value of for all beams on edges of a panel.
= factor defined in Section 410.3.7.3
= net tensile strain in extreme tension steel at nominal strength.
= modification factor reflection the reduced mechanical properties of lightweight concrete.
= multiplier for additional long-time deflection as defined in Section 409.6.2.5
= ratio of nonprestressed tension reinforcement =
= ratio of nonprestressed compression reinforcement =
= reinforcement ratio producing balanced strain conditions. See Section 410.4.2
= strength-reduction factor. See Section 409.4
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL SHEET ...................................................................................................................................... ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT............................................................................................................................... iii
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................................. iv
ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS, AND NOTATIONS...................................................................................... v
TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. vii
LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................................... xiv
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... xvii
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 23
1.1 The Project ........................................................................................................................................ 23
1.2 Project Location ................................................................................................................................. 25
1.3 Project Client ..................................................................................................................................... 25
1.4 Project Objectives .............................................................................................................................. 26
1.5 Scope and Limitations ....................................................................................................................... 27
1.6 Project Development ......................................................................................................................... 27
Chapter 2: Design Criteria and Review of Related Literature ................................................................ 29
2.1 Design Criteria ................................................................................................................................... 29
Data and Statistics ................................................................................................................................ 29
Population Distribution of Bulacan ........................................................................................................ 31
Historical Growth Population of San Jose Del Monte City .................................................................... 31
Population Distribution by Barangay ..................................................................................................... 32
Topography and Elevation .................................................................................................................... 32
Soil Map................................................................................................................................................ 34
Geological Map ..................................................................................................................................... 35
Hazards ................................................................................................................................................ 36
Geotechnical Investigation Report (SJDM) ........................................................................................... 39
Proposed Plan Layout .......................................................................................................................... 41
Design Loads........................................................................................................................................ 43
2.2 Review of Related Literature ............................................................................................................. 45
Special Moment Resisting Frame ......................................................................................................... 45
Chevron Bracing System (Inverted V-Bracing System) ........................................................................ 46
Cross-Bracing System .......................................................................................................................... 48
Chapter 3: Design Constraints, Trade-offs, and Standards ................................................................... 50
vii
3.1 Design Constraints ............................................................................................................................ 50
Quantitative Constraints ....................................................................................................................... 50
Qualitative Constraints.......................................................................................................................... 51
3.2 Design Trade-offs .............................................................................................................................. 52
3.2.1 Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)................................................................................... 52
3.2.2 Chevron Bracing Frame System .................................................................................................. 53
3.2.3 Cross-Bracing System ................................................................................................................. 54
3.3 Multiple Constraints using Initial Normalization Method ..................................................................... 54
Raw Data .............................................................................................................................................. 55
Normalized Data ................................................................................................................................... 56
3.4 Trade-off Assessment........................................................................................................................ 59
Economic Constraints (Material Cost and Labor Cost) ......................................................................... 59
Constructability Constraints (Schedule and Labor Cost) ...................................................................... 59
Sustainability Constraints (Lifespan and Maintenance Cost) ................................................................ 59
Risk Assessment Constraints (Story Drift) ............................................................................................ 59
Safety ................................................................................................................................................... 59
Uncertainty ........................................................................................................................................... 59
Overall Assessment of Trade-offs......................................................................................................... 59
3.5 Design Codes and Standards ............................................................................................................ 60
National Structural Code of the Philippines Volume 1, Seventh Edition 2015 ...................................... 60
National Building Code of the Philippines ............................................................................................. 60
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines Steel Handbook Third Edition .......................... 60
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) ............................................................................ 61
Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC) Chapter 16 of Division IV; Earthquake Design .......................... 61
AISC 360-16 LRFD ............................................................................................................................... 61
Chapter 4: Design Methodology ............................................................................................................... 62
4.1 Design Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 62
4.2 Design Process.................................................................................................................................. 63
Design for Beams ................................................................................................................................. 63
Design of Columns ............................................................................................................................... 65
Design of Connections.......................................................................................................................... 67
viii
Design for Member Sizing Optimization of Three Example Steel Moment Frames .............................. 68
Design of Brace Members .................................................................................................................... 69
Design of Base Plate and Pedestal ...................................................................................................... 70
Design of Footing.................................................................................................................................. 75
4.3 Design Inputs ..................................................................................................................................... 80
Initial Member Section and Properties .................................................................................................. 80
Load Specifications............................................................................................................................... 80
Primary Loads ................................................................................................................................... 80
Ultimate Loads ................................................................................................................................... 80
Service Loads .................................................................................................................................... 81
4.4 Design of Trade-off 1: Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) ..................................................... 82
Design Geometry and Analysis............................................................................................................. 82
Geometric Modelling of Trade-off 1 ................................................................................................... 82
Summary of Derived Forces, Moments, and Displacements of Trade-off 1 ....................................... 82
Design Results of Trade-off 1 ............................................................................................................... 86
Final Member Section and Properties of Trade-off 1 ......................................................................... 86
Load Diagrams .................................................................................................................................. 86
Beam Design of Trade-off 1............................................................................................................... 94
Column Design of Trade-off 1 ............................................................................................................ 96
Bracing Design of Trade-off 1 ............................................................................................................ 97
Steel Connection Design of Trade-off 1 ............................................................................................. 97
Base Plate and Pedestal Design of Trade-off 1 ............................................................................... 113
Footing Design of Trade-off 1 .......................................................................................................... 121
Structural Plans for Trade-off 1: SMRF............................................................................................... 128
Beams Framing Plan ....................................................................................................................... 129
Columns Framing Plan .................................................................................................................... 132
Connection Details........................................................................................................................... 133
Footing Framing Plan and Sections ................................................................................................. 135
4.5 Design of Trade-off 2: SMRF with Chevron Bracing Frame System ................................................ 136
Design Geometry and Analysis........................................................................................................... 136
Geometric Modelling of Trade-off 2 ................................................................................................. 136
ix
Summary of Derived Forces, Moments, and Displacements of Trade-off 2 ..................................... 137
Design Results of Trade-off 2 ............................................................................................................. 140
Final Member Section and Properties of Trade-off 2 ....................................................................... 140
Load Diagrams ................................................................................................................................ 141
Beam Design of Trade-off 2............................................................................................................. 148
Column Design of Trade-off 2 .......................................................................................................... 150
Bracing Design of Trade-off 2 .......................................................................................................... 151
Steel Connection Design of Trade-off 2 ........................................................................................... 152
Structural Plans for Trade-off 2: SMRF with Chevron Bracing System ............................................... 205
Footing Framing Plan and Sections ................................................................................................. 212
4.6 Design of Trade-off 3: SMRF with Cross Bracing Frame System .................................................... 213
Design Geometry and Analysis........................................................................................................... 213
Geometric Modelling of Trade-off 3 ................................................................................................. 213
Summary of Derived Forces, Moments, and Displacements of Trade-off 3 ..................................... 214
Design Results of Trade-off 3 ............................................................................................................. 217
Final Member Section and Properties of Trade-off 3 ....................................................................... 217
Load Diagrams ................................................................................................................................ 218
Beam Design of Trade-off 3............................................................................................................. 225
Steel Connection Design of Trade-off 3 ........................................................................................... 226
Structural Plans for Trade-off 3: SMRF with Cross Bracing System ................................................... 280
4.7 Multiple Constraints using Final Normalization Method ................................................................... 289
x
Summary of Final Estimates ............................................................................................................... 290
Normalized Data ................................................................................................................................. 291
Weighted Sum of Various Percentage Weight ................................................................................. 291
Overall Trade-off Assessment ......................................................................................................... 293
4.8 Sensitivity Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 293
Economic vs Constructability .............................................................................................................. 293
Economic vs Sustainability ................................................................................................................. 294
Economic vs Risk-Assessment ........................................................................................................... 295
Economic vs Safety ............................................................................................................................ 296
Economic vs Uncertainty .................................................................................................................... 296
Chapter 5: Final Design........................................................................................................................... 298
5.1 Final Design of Winning Trade-off ................................................................................................... 298
Final Beam Designs............................................................................................................................ 298
Final Column Designs......................................................................................................................... 299
Final Bracing Designs ......................................................................................................................... 300
Final Beams Framing Plan ................................................................................................................. 301
Final Columns Framing Plan .............................................................................................................. 304
Final Steel Connection Details ............................................................................................................ 305
Final Base Plate Connection Details................................................................................................... 306
Final Footing Framing Plan and Sections ........................................................................................... 308
5.2 Final Estimate of Winning Trade-off................................................................................................. 309
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 315
APPENDIX A: INITIAL ESTIMATES COMPUTATION ............................................................................. 319
A.1 Economic Constraint ....................................................................................................................... 319
A.2 Constructability Constraint .............................................................................................................. 319
A.3 Sustainability Constraint .................................................................................................................. 320
A.4 Risk Assessment Constraint ........................................................................................................... 321
A.5 Safety Constraint ............................................................................................................................. 321
A.6 Uncertainty Constraint ..................................................................................................................... 322
APPENDIX B: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT .............................................................................................. 324
xi
APPENDIX C: STRESS CHECK FOR DESIGN TRADE OFFS ................................................................ 344
C.1 Trade-off 1: Beam Utilization Table ................................................................................................. 344
APPENDIX D: STEEL CONNECTION DESIGN CHECK .......................................................................... 370
D.1 Trade-off 1: Steel Connection Design Check .................................................................................. 370
APPENDIX E: BASE PLATE AND PEDESTAL DESIGN CHECK ........................................................... 467
E.1 Trade-off 1: Base Plate and Pedestal Design Check ...................................................................... 467
APPENDIX F: FOOTING DESIGN CHECK .............................................................................................. 515
F.1 Trade-off 1: Footing Design Check .................................................................................................. 516
APPENDIX G: FINAL ESTIMATES .......................................................................................................... 549
G.1 Final Estimates for Economic Constraint ........................................................................................ 549
Trade-off 1: Final Estimates for Economic Constraint ........................................................................ 549
Trade off-2: Final Estimates for Economic Constraint........................................................................ 554
Trade off-3: Final Estimates for Economic Constraint ........................................................................ 560
G.2 Final Estimates for Constructability Constraint................................................................................ 565
Trade-off 1: Final Estimates for Constructability Constraint ............................................................... 565
G.3 Final Estimates for Sustainability Constraint ................................................................................... 573
Trade-off 1: Final Estimates for Sustainability Constraint .................................................................. 573
G.4 Final Estimates for Risk-Assessment Constraint ............................................................................ 574
G.5 Final Estimates for Safety Constraint .............................................................................................. 575
G.6 Final Estimates for Uncertainty Constraint ...................................................................................... 576
xii
APPENDIX H: CURRICULUM VITAE ....................................................................................................... 577
xiii
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. Historical Data on Commercial Areas 2017-1018 as per Location Clearance ............................ 29
Table 2-2. Total Population of San Jose Del Monte..................................................................................... 31
Table 2-3. Total Population by Barangay of San Jose Del Monte................................................................ 32
Table 2-4. Superimposed Dead Loads ........................................................................................................ 44
Table 2-5. Minimum Uniform Live Loads ..................................................................................................... 44
Table 2-6. Wind Load Parameters ............................................................................................................... 44
Table 2-7. Wind Load Parameters ............................................................................................................... 45
Table 2-8. Advantages and Disadvantages of Special Moment Resisting Frame System ........................... 46
Table 2-9. Advantages and Disadvantages of Chevron Bracing System ..................................................... 48
Table 2-10. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cross-Bracing System....................................................... 49
Table 3-1. Raw Data .................................................................................................................................... 55
Table 3-2. Normalized Data ......................................................................................................................... 56
Table 3-3. First Weighted Sum of Various Percentage ................................................................................ 56
Table 3-4. Second Weighted Sum of Various Percentage ........................................................................... 57
Table 3-5. Third Weighted Sum of Various Percentage ............................................................................... 58
Table 4-1. Initial Members and Properties ................................................................................................... 80
Table 4-2. Primary Loads ............................................................................................................................ 80
Table 4-3. Ultimate Loads............................................................................................................................ 81
Table 4-4. Service Loads ............................................................................................................................. 81
Table 4-5. Table Summary of Force and Moments of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 1 ......................... 83
Table 4-6. Summary of Force and Moments of Girders for Trade-off 1 ....................................................... 83
Table 4-7. Summary of Forces and Moments of Beams for Trade-off 1 ...................................................... 83
Table 4-8. Summary of Forces and Moments of Columns for Trade-off 1 ................................................... 83
Table 4-9. Summary of Forces and Moments of Bracings for Trade-off 1 ................................................... 84
Table 4-10. Summary of Support Reaction for Trade-off 1 .......................................................................... 84
Table 4-11. Summary of Displacements for Trade-off 1 .............................................................................. 85
Table 4-12. Story Drift Check for Trade-off 1 ............................................................................................... 85
Table 4-13. Design Results of Member Section and Properties for SMRF .................................................. 86
Table 4-14. Schedule of Beams along X-Direction for Trade-off 1............................................................... 94
Table 4-15. Schedule of Beams along Z-Direction for Trade-off 1 ............................................................... 95
Table 4-16. Schedule of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 1 ...................................................................... 95
Table 4-17. Schedule of Columns for Trade-off 1 ........................................................................................ 96
Table 4-18. Schedule of Bracings for Trade-off 1 ........................................................................................ 97
Table 4-19. Summary of Steel Connection Design ...................................................................................... 97
Table 4-20. Summary of Base Plate Connection Design ........................................................................... 113
Table 4-21. Summary of Footing Design ................................................................................................... 121
Table 4-22. Table Summary of Force and Moments of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 2 ..................... 137
Table 4-23. Summary of Force and Moments of Girders for Trade-off 2 ................................................... 137
Table 4-24. Summary of Forces and Moments of Beams for Trade-off 2 .................................................. 138
xiv
Table 4-25. Summary of Forces and Moments of Columns for Trade-off 2 ............................................... 138
Table 4-26. Summary of Forces and Moments of Bracings for Trade-off 2 ............................................... 138
Table 4-27. Summary of Support Reaction for Trade-off 2 ........................................................................ 139
Table 4-28. Summary of Displacements for Trade-off 2 ............................................................................ 139
Table 4-29. Story Drift Check for Trade-off 2 ............................................................................................. 140
Table 4-30. Design Results of Member Section and Properties for SMRF ................................................ 140
Table 4-31. Schedule of Beams along X-Direction for Trade-off 2............................................................. 149
Table 4-32. Schedule of Beams along Z-Direction for Trade-off 2 ............................................................. 149
Table 4-33. Schedule of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 2 .................................................................... 150
Table 4-34. Schedule of Columns for Trade-off 2 ...................................................................................... 151
Table 4-35. Schedule of Bracings for Trade-off 2 ...................................................................................... 152
Table 4-36. Summary of Steel Connection Design .................................................................................... 152
Table 4-38. Summary of Footing Design ................................................................................................... 193
Table 4-38. Table Summary of Force and Moments of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 2 ..................... 214
Table 4-40. Summary of Force and Moments of Girders for Trade-off 2 ................................................... 214
Table 4-41. Summary of Forces and Moments of Beams for Trade-off 3 .................................................. 215
Table 4-42. Summary of Forces and Moments of Columns for Trade-off 3 ............................................... 215
Table 4-43. Summary of Forces and Moments of Bracings for Trade-off 3 ............................................... 215
Table 4-44. Summary of Support Reaction for Trade-off 3 ........................................................................ 216
Table 4-45. Summary of Displacements for Trade-off 3 ............................................................................ 216
Table 4-46. Story Drift Check for Trade-off 3 ............................................................................................. 217
Table 4-47. Design Results of Member Section and Properties for SMRF ................................................ 217
Table 4-48. Schedule of Bracings for Trade-off 3 ...................................................................................... 226
Table 4-49. Summary of Steel Connection Design .................................................................................... 226
Table 4-52. Summary of Final Estimates ................................................................................................... 290
Table 4-53. Normalized Data ..................................................................................................................... 291
Table 4-54. First Weighted Sum of Various Percentage ............................................................................ 291
Table 4-55. Second Weighted Sum of Various Percentage ....................................................................... 292
Table 4-56. Third Weighted Sum of Various Percentage........................................................................... 292
Table 4-57. Economic vs. Constructability ................................................................................................. 293
Table 4-58. Economic vs. Sustainability .................................................................................................... 294
Table 4-59. Economic vs. Risk Assessment .............................................................................................. 295
Table 4-60. Economic vs. Safety ............................................................................................................... 296
Table 4-61. Economic vs. Uncertainty ....................................................................................................... 297
Table 5-1. Final Schedule of Beams along X-Direction ............................................................................. 298
Table 5-2. Final Schedule of Beams along Z-Direction.............................................................................. 299
Table 5-3. Final Schedule of Intermediate Beams ..................................................................................... 299
Table 5-4. Final Schedule of Columns ....................................................................................................... 299
xv
Table 5-5. Final Schedule of Bracings ....................................................................................................... 300
Table 5-6. Summary of Final Estimates of the Winning Trade-off.............................................................. 309
xvi
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1. Perspective Front View Of The Project...................................................................................... 24
Figure 1-2. Perspective Isometric View Of The Project ............................................................................... 24
Figure 1-3. Project Location Distance .......................................................................................................... 25
Figure 1-4. The Location Of The Project...................................................................................................... 25
Figure 1-5. Project Development Plan ......................................................................................................... 28
Figure 2-1. Lgu Score Percentage Of Bulacan ............................................................................................ 31
Figure 2-2. San Jose Del Monte City Topography Map ............................................................................... 32
Figure 2-3. Tungkong Mangga Elevation Map ............................................................................................. 33
Figure 2-4. San Jose Del Monte Soil Map ................................................................................................... 34
Figure 2-5. San Jose Del Monte Geological Map ........................................................................................ 35
Figure 2-6. Csjdm City Rain Induced Landslide Hazard Map ...................................................................... 36
Figure 2-7. Bulacan Flood Hazard Map ....................................................................................................... 37
Figure 2-8. Zoom in (Bulacan 5 year Floor Hazard Map) ............................................................................. 37
Figure 2-9. Tungkong Mangga City Nearest Fault Line ............................................................................... 38
Figure 2-10. Borehole Location Plan ........................................................................................................... 39
Figure 2-11. Final Boring Log ...................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 2-12. Site Development Plan Of The Project .................................................................................... 41
Figure 2-13. Ground To Second Floor Plan Of The Project ......................................................................... 42
Figure 2-14. Front And Right-Side Elevation Of The Project ....................................................................... 42
Figure 2-15. Front And Left Side Elevation Of The Project .......................................................................... 43
Figure 3-1. Special Moment Resisting Frame System ................................................................................. 52
Figure 3-2. Chevron Bracing System ........................................................................................................... 53
Figure 3-3. Cross-Bracing System ............................................................................................................... 54
Figure 4-1: Design Methodology .................................................................................................................. 62
Figure 4-2: Design Of Beams ...................................................................................................................... 64
Figure 4-3: Design Of Columns ................................................................................................................... 66
Figure 4-4: Design Of Connections.............................................................................................................. 67
Figure 4-5: Design For Member Sizing Optimization Of Three Example Steel Moment Frames ................. 68
Figure 4-6: Design Of Tensional Members .................................................................................................. 69
Figure 4-7: Design Of Base Plate ................................................................................................................ 73
Figure 4-8: Design Of Pedestal ................................................................................................................... 74
Figure 4-9: Design Of Footing ..................................................................................................................... 79
Figure 4-10: 3d Model Of The Project.......................................................................................................... 82
Figure 4-11: Dead Loads ............................................................................................................................. 87
Figure 4-12: Live Loads ............................................................................................................................... 87
Figure 4-13: Wind Loads At X-Direction ...................................................................................................... 88
Figure 4-14: Wind Loads At Z-Direction....................................................................................................... 88
Figure 4-15: Earthquake Load At + X Direction ........................................................................................... 89
Figure 4-16. Earthquake Load At - X Direction ............................................................................................ 89
xvii
Figure 4-17: Earthquake Load At + Z Direction ........................................................................................... 90
Figure 4-18: Earthquake Load At - Z Direction ............................................................................................ 90
Figure 4-19. Governing Axial Force, Fx (1.2dl + 0.5fll + 1.6rll) ..................................................................... 91
Figure 4-20. Governing Shear Force In Y-Axis, Fy (1.2dl + 1.6fll + 0.5rll) .................................................... 91
Figure 4-21. Governing Shear Force In Z-Axis, Fz (0.9dl + 1.0wl(-Z)).......................................................... 92
Figure 4-22. Governing Bending Moment At X-Axis, Mx (1.2dl + 1.0eq(+Z) + 0.5fll) .................................... 92
Figure 4-23. Governing Bending Moment At Y-Axis, My (1.2dl + 1.0eq(-Z) + 0.5fll)..................................... 93
Figure 4-24. Governing Bending Moment At Z-Axis, Mz (0.9dl + 1.0wl(+X)) ................................................ 93
Figure 4-25. Beam Size Detailing For Trade-Off 1....................................................................................... 94
Figure 4-26. Column Size Detailing For Trade-Off 1.................................................................................... 96
Figure 4-27. Bracing Size Detailing For Trade-Off 1 .................................................................................... 97
Figure 4-28. Front View Of The Steel Connection Summary ....................................................................... 98
Figure 4-29. Side View Of The Steel Connection Summary ........................................................................ 98
Figure 4-30. Side View Grid B-B Of The Steel Connection Summary ......................................................... 99
Figure 4-31. Lateral View And Front View Of Connection No. 1 Of Trade-Off 1 .......................................... 99
Figure 4-32. Lateral View Of Connection No. 2 Of Trade-Off 1 ................................................................. 101
Figure 4-33. Top View And Bottom View Of Connection No. 2 Of Trade-Off 1 .......................................... 101
Figure 4-34. Lateral View And Front View Of Connection No. 3 Of Trade-Off 1 ........................................ 103
Figure 4-43. Top View And Anchor Detailing Of Connection No. 1 Of Trade-Off 1.................................... 114
Figure 4-49. Plan And Elevation View Of Footing No. 1 Of Trade-Off 1 .................................................... 122
Figure 4-52. 2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan ................................................................................................ 129
Figure 4-53. 2nd Floor Roof Beam Framing Plan ....................................................................................... 130
Figure 4-54. Top Roof Beam Framing Plan ............................................................................................... 131
Figure 4-55. Columns Framing Plan .......................................................................................................... 132
Figure 4-56. Schedule Of Steel Connections ............................................................................................. 133
Figure 4-57. Base Plate Connection Details .............................................................................................. 134
xviii
Figure 4-58. Footing Plan .......................................................................................................................... 135
Figure 4-59. Schedule Of Footings ............................................................................................................ 136
Figure 4-60: 3d Model Of The Project........................................................................................................ 137
Figure 4-61: Dead Loads ........................................................................................................................... 141
Figure 4-62: Live Loads ............................................................................................................................. 142
Figure 4-63: Wind Loads At X-Direction .................................................................................................... 142
Figure 4-64: Wind Loads At Z-Direction..................................................................................................... 143
Figure 4-65: Earthquake Load At + X Direction ......................................................................................... 143
Figure 4-66: Earthquake Load At - X Direction .......................................................................................... 144
Figure 4-67: Earthquake Load At + Z Direction ......................................................................................... 144
Figure 4-68: Earthquake Load At - Z Direction .......................................................................................... 145
Figure 4-69. Governing Axial Force, Fx (1.2dl + 0.5fll + 1.6rll) ................................................................... 145
Figure 4-70. Governing Shear Force In Y-Axis, Fy (1.2dl + 1.6fll + 0.5rll) .................................................. 146
Figure 4-71. Governing Shear Force In Z-Axis, Fz (1.2dl + 1.0eq(+Z) + 0.5fll) .......................................... 146
Figure 4-72. Governing Bending Moment At X-Axis, Mx (1.2dl + 1.0eq(+Z) + 0.5fll) .................................. 147
Figure 4-73. Governing Bending Moment At Y-Axis, My (0.9dl + 1.0wl(-Z)) ............................................... 147
Figure 4-74. Governing Bending Moment At Z-Axis, Mz (0.9dl + 1.0wl(+X)) .............................................. 148
Figure 4-75. Beam Size Detailing For Trade-Off 2..................................................................................... 148
Figure 4-76. Column Size Detailing For Trade-Off 2.................................................................................. 150
Figure 4-77. Bracing Size Detailing For Trade-Off 2 .................................................................................. 151
Figure 4-78. Side View Of The Steel Connection Summary ...................................................................... 153
Figure 4-79. Side View Grid B-B Of The Steel Connection Summary ....................................................... 153
Figure 4-80. Side View Of The Chevron Steel Connection Summary........................................................ 154
Figure 4-88. Top View Of Connection No. 6 Of Trade-Off 2 ...................................................................... 163
Figure 4-90. Top View Of Connection No. 7 Of Trade-Off 2 ...................................................................... 164
Figure 4-94. Lateral View Of Connection No. 10 Of Trade-Off 2 ............................................................... 172
xix
Figure 4-100. Lateral View And Front View Of Connection No. 3 Of Trade-Off 2 ...................................... 181
Figure 4-101. Lateral View Of Main Connection Of Connection No. 4 Of Trade-Off 2 ............................... 183
Figure 4-102. Lateral View Of Directly Bolted Connection Of Connection No. 4 Of Trade-Off 2................ 183
Figure 4-103. Lateral View Of Directly Welded Connection Of Connection No. 4 Of Trade-Off 2.............. 184
Figure 4-104. Top View And Anchor Detailing Of Connection No. 4 Of Trade-Off 2.................................. 184
Figure 4-105. Lateral View Of Base Plate Of Connection No. 4 Of Trade-Off 2 ........................................ 185
Figure 4-111. Plan And Elevation View Of Footing No. 1 Of Trade-Off 2 .................................................. 194
Figure 4-116. 2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan .............................................................................................. 206
Figure 4-117. 2nd Floor Roof Beam Framing Plan ..................................................................................... 207
Figure 4-118. Top Roof Beam Framing Plan ............................................................................................. 208
Figure 4-119. Columns Framing Plan ........................................................................................................ 209
Figure 4-120. Schedule Of Steel Connections ........................................................................................... 210
Figure 4-121. Base Plate Connection Details ............................................................................................ 211
Figure 4-122. Footing Plan ........................................................................................................................ 212
Figure 4-123. Schedule Of Footings .......................................................................................................... 213
Figure 4-124: 3d Model Of The Project...................................................................................................... 214
Figure 4-125: Dead Loads ......................................................................................................................... 218
Figure 4-126: Live Loads ........................................................................................................................... 219
Figure 4-127: Wind Loads At X-Direction .................................................................................................. 219
Figure 4-128: Wind Loads At Z-Direction................................................................................................... 220
Figure 4-129: Earthquake Load At + X Direction ....................................................................................... 220
Figure 4-130: Earthquake Load At - X Direction ........................................................................................ 221
Figure 4-131: Earthquake Load At + Z Direction ....................................................................................... 221
Figure 4-132: Earthquake Load At - Z Direction ........................................................................................ 222
Figure 4-133. Governing Axial Force, Fx (1.2dl + 0.5fll + 1.6rll) ................................................................. 222
Figure 4-134. Governing Shear Force In Y-Axis, Fy (1.2dl + 1.6fll + 0.5rll) ................................................ 223
Figure 4-135. Governing Shear Force In Z-Axis, Fz (1.2dl + 1.0eq(+Z) + 0.5fll) ........................................ 223
Figure 4-136. Governing Bending Moment At X-Axis, Mx (1.2dl + 1.0eq(+Z) + 0.5fll) ................................ 224
Figure 4-137. Governing Bending Moment At Y-Axis, My (1.2dl + 1.0eq(+Z) + 0.5fll) ................................ 224
Figure 4-138. Governing Bending Moment At Z-Axis, Mz (0.9dl + 1.0wl(+X)) ............................................ 225
Figure 4-139. Beam Size Detailing For Trade-Off 3................................................................................... 225
xx
Figure 4-140. Front View Of The Steel Connection Summary ................................................................... 227
Figure 4-141. Side View Of The Steel Connection Summary .................................................................... 227
Figure 4-142. Side View Grid B-B Of The Steel Connection Summary ..................................................... 227
Figure 4-143. Side View Of The Cross Steel Connection Summary .......................................................... 228
Figure 4-146. Top View And Bottom View Of Connection No. 2 Of Trade-Off 3 ........................................ 230
Figure 4-151. Top View Of Connection No. 6 Of Trade-Off 3 .................................................................... 237
Figure 4-153. Top View Of Connection No. 7 Of Trade-Off 3 .................................................................... 238
Figure 4-155. Top View And Bottom View Of Connection No. 8 Of Trade-Off 3 ........................................ 240
Figure 4-157. Lateral View Of Connection No. 10 Of Trade-Off 3 ............................................................. 247
Figure 4-179. 2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan .............................................................................................. 281
Figure 4-180. 2nd Floor Roof Beam Framing Plan ..................................................................................... 282
xxi
Figure 4-181. Top Roof Beam Framing Plan ............................................................................................. 283
Figure 4-182. Columns Framing Plan ........................................................................................................ 284
Figure 4-183. Steel Connection Details ..................................................................................................... 286
Figure 4-184. Base Plate Connection Details ............................................................................................ 287
Figure 4-185. Footing Plan ........................................................................................................................ 288
Figure 4-186. Schedule Of Footings .......................................................................................................... 289
Figure 4-187. Economic Vs. Constructability ............................................................................................. 294
Figure 4-188. Economic Vs. Sustainability ................................................................................................ 295
Figure 4-189. Economic Vs. Risk Assessment .......................................................................................... 295
Figure 4-190. Economic Vs. Safety ........................................................................................................... 296
Figure 4-191. Economic Vs. Uncertainty ................................................................................................... 297
Figure 5-1. 2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan .................................................................................................. 301
Figure 5-2. 2nd Floor Roof Beam Framing Plan ......................................................................................... 302
Figure 5-3. Top Roof Beam Framing Plan ................................................................................................. 303
Figure 5-4. Columns Framing Plan ............................................................................................................ 305
Figure 5-5. Steel Connection Details ......................................................................................................... 306
Figure 5-6. Base Plate Connection Details ................................................................................................ 307
Figure 5-7. Final Footing Framing Plan ..................................................................................................... 308
xxii
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 The Project
The City of San Jose Del Monte (CSJDM), which was situated in the Province of Bulacan, is a fast
growing and deve
city to the possibility of an increase in population, land use conversion, and mass horizontal and vertical
development. Along with its rapid growth and development, it is inevitable that the environment of the city will
be affected. While the development and growth of the city is beneficial for its residents, it will be nothing if
the natural environment of the city will suffer.
According to the Ten (10) Year Solid Waste Management Plan created by the Planning and
Development Office of CSJDM, the city is faced with issues on an abnormal growth of population resulting in
problems that affected the quality of their natural resources. It is currently facing problems on the pollution
of their water ways, high occurrences of diseases due to water contamination and improper waste
management. Moreover, it is a contributor leading to the pollution of Manila Bay through the water bodies
running to the Bay.
It is evident that the CSJDM is one of the Local Government Units (LGUs) challenged by the growing
quantities of waste produced in the Philippines. According to an article by Espino (2006), there were 62,415
Natural Resources. It is also stated in the
discussion paper made by Domingo and Manejar (2021) that the City of San Jose Del Monte (CSJDM),
Bulacan produces approximately 20,000 kilograms of municipal waste daily. Arguably, the same paper stated
that of the waste produced, 77.11 percent was residential, with 39.12 percent was institutions and 0.02
percent was agricultural.
The CSJDM LGU has formulated and implemented their first Ten (10) Year Solid Waste
Management Plan in 2004, which adheres to the requirements and guidelines stated in Republic Act 9003.
The Republic Act 9003 is one of the methods that the Philippines has implemented to improve its solid waste
management. It issues a clear policy for the ease of execution of solid waste management plans nationwide
through the Local Government Units (LGUs). The RA 9003 was implemented by the Philippine government
for the purpose of reducing the waste produced in the country with the initiative of the different LGUs.
In line with the CSJDM Ten (10) Year Solid Waste Management Plan, a new Material Recovery
Facility (MRF) is proposed to support waste reduction and have an improved operation of recovering
recyclable materials from municipal solid waste. To reduce the possibility of affecting the health of the
residents, the proposed MRF is to be situated in a land far from residential and commercial areas.
The isometric, side, and front view of the project perspective of the design project are depicted in the
figures below. Furthermore, Sketchup 2020 was utilized to create the models and it is rendered in Lumion
3D.
23
Figure 1-1. Perspective Front View of the Project
Figure 1-2. Perspective Isometric View of the Project
24
1.2 Project Location
The project will be in an open area near Ciudad Real in Tungkong Mangga, San Jose Del Monte,
Bulacan. The project location is significantly distant from the residential areas in accordance to the guidelines
set by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). The area of Tungkong Mangga, in
rain induced landslide hazard map, has low to moderate susceptibility to
landslide and erosion.
There is a six-minute drive from SM City San Jose Del Monte to the location through public
transportation, which is 2.3 kilometers long as what Figure 1-3 shows. On the other hand, Figure 1-4
illustrates the plot of land on which the project will be built. A leased land near the residences, which will be
used for production, follows the guidelines of the DENR.
The proposed materials recovery facility will cater the city of San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan with the
nearest operational sanitary landfill being located at Matictic, Pinagtulayan, Norzagaray, Bulacan and the
nearest operational dumpsites being located at Brgy. 186, Caloocan City (North Caloocan Dump Site) and
Rodriguez, Rizal (Rizal Provincial Sanitary Landfill) as of the writing as the nearby dumpsites in Marilao and
Malolos in Bulacan, respectively, have been shut down for their illegal operations due to the strict
implementation of RA 9003 or the Solid Waste Management Act of 2003. The materials recovery facility
would process residential or commercial trash in the hope of capturing recyclable materials.
Figure 1-3. Project Location Distance

Source: Google Maps via Satellite View
Figure 1-4. The Location of The Project

Source: Google Maps via Street View
25
1.3 Project Client
The City Government of San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan, will serve as the
project's client in this instance. According to the 2020 census, it is the largest town
in the entire province of Bulacan in terms of land area, and it has a population of
651,823 people, making it the largest municipality in the entire province. Their
stakeholders, investors, and clients will be able to make optimal use of the facility
since they will be able to dispose of the materials that will be required for its
construction and operation. In coordination with the City Environment and Natural Resources Office
(CENRO) for environmental compliance and in accordance with the health protocol for the environment, it
will be led by the city engineer, Engr. Rufino A. Gravador Jr., and will work in close collaboration with other
city departments.
Client Specifications
At least 50 years in design life and minimal maintenance costs are mandated by the client for the
structure. This means that the Engineering Specifications must adhere to all the DENR's rules and
regulations. The DPWH's regulations will regulate the facility's road management and transportation route.
Solid waste management necessitates the monitoring of solid waste specifications, which can be
accomplished with the help of ASTM D4843 - 88(2016) for solid waste testing and ASTM D5198 17 for
solid waste disposal. ASTM D5745 15 is a reliable designation for the construction of the MRF when it
comes to zoning and site investigation.
1.4 Project Objectives
In designing a materials recovery facility, the designer is obliged to identify the proposed project's
objectives based on the client and customers' requirements.
General Objective
The overall goal of the proposed project is to design a Materials Recovery Facility at Tungkong
Mangga, San Jose Del Monte Bulacan, by providing a design structure constructed on engineering
procedures and codes, investigating and comparison of trade-offs based on the constraints of the client such
as functionality, environmental, social (health and safety), risk assessment, economic, sustainability, and
constructability to enable productive and systematic movement and processing of materials storage and
composed separated wastes.
Specific Objectives
To assess and determine the benefits and drawbacks of trade-offs concerning the constraints
specified.
To stipulate a design that will include the rules and regulations set by the National Building Code of
the Philippines, National Structural Code of the Philippines Volume II, AISC 2015 LRFD, and the
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines Steel Handbook Third Edition.
26
To design an architectural and structural plan of a Materials Recovery Facility using 3D Sketchup
2021, Lumion 3D Rendering Software, AutoCAD 2021, STAAD Foundation Advanced, and STAAD
RAM Connection.
1.5 Scope and Limitations
For our design project's scope, the software we'll be using for this project will give the layout and
point of view for the overall design. The National Building Code and National Structural Code of the
Philippines will serve as the basis for the specifications and measurements used in the project. The DENR's
specifications and guidelines will finally serve as the foundation for the construction process and
methodology. In addition, the cost estimates of the whole project will be provided, and the structural design
plans and analysis of the tradeoffs are included.
t follows then that a plumbing, mechanical, electrical, fire

protection and sanitary plans are not included. Furthermore, due to lack of resources, some of the related
literatures that the researchers have looked for include dates in the past, roughly eight years and more.
1.6 Project Development
The designers will make use of the flowchart to select the most effective design for the project's
completion in order to construct an organized strategy for addressing the stated problem.
1. Identifying the Problem

The designers identify an existing problem that is intended to share opinions and formulate solutions
to the resulting problems.
2. Title Conceptualization
This one encompasses the conceptualization of the possible plans and solution for the project.
3. Data Gathering
After identifying the problem, gathering of data on the said topic and a review of related concepts
takes place to begin the project with possible solutions pertaining to its problems.
4. Constraints
Identify and selecting constraints that affect the design of the structures.
5. Trade-offs
Assessment of options used for the project and approach best meets the goal of the project.
6. Project Analysis and Design
The materials recovery facility is to follow the different requirements and standards set upon the
National Structural Code of the Philippines and National Building Code of the Philippines.
7. Estimation of costs and number of working days
Estimating the overall expenses of the project and the number of working days for the construction
of the facility.
27
Figure 1-5. Project Development Plan
28
Chapter 2: Design Criteria and Review of Related Literature
2.1 Design Criteria
To effectively design a materials recovery facility in Tungkong Mangga, San Jose Del Monte,
Bulacan, data and information from several sources, organizations, and agencies are presented below. In
addition, the National Building Code of the Philippines, National Structural Code of the Philippines Volume II,
and the Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines Steel Handbook Third Edition will all be
considered in the plan.
Data and Statistics

According to the Socio-Economical Profile created by the Planning and Development Office of
CSJDM (2020), the Barangay Tungkong Mangga is one of the most developing commercial district centers
located in CSDJM. The district centers are commonly controlled by tertiary industries, which are serviced by
the CSJDM frequented roadways.
Table 2-1. Historical Data on Commercial Areas 2017-1018 as per Location Clearance
Source: CSJDM City Planning and Development Office
Barangay Commercial Areas (sqm.)
2017 2018 % Change
1 Assumption - 762 -
2 Bagong Buhay I 1007 10034 896%
3 Bagong Buhay II 743 3966 434%
4 Bagong Buhay III - - -
5 Citrus 502 388 -23%
6 Ciudad Real - - -
7 Dulong Bayan 8346 10256 23%
8 Fatima I 1119 965 14%
9 Fatima II - 125 -
10 Fatima III - - -
11 Fatima IV 192 - -100%
12 Fatima V 1621 - -100%
13 Guijo 1092 - -100%
14 Mulawin - 1432 -
15 Narra 336.9 1176 249%
16 Yakal 60 222 270%
17 Gaya-Gaya 7698 14379 87%
18 Graceville 35426 10618 -70%
19 Gumaoc Central - - -
20 Gumaoc East - 1278 -
21 Gumaoc West 139.75 179 28%
29
22 Kaybanban 1127 69 -94%
23 Kaypian 11913.36 6373 -47%
24 Lawang Pari - 1077 -
25 Maharlika 49251 5086 -90%
26 Minuyan I 403 287 -29%
27 Minuyan II - 110 -
28 Minuyan III 130.58 86 -34%
29 Minuyan IV 175 340 94%
30 Minuyan Proper 24141 19307 -20%
31 Minuyan V 375 - -100%
32 Muzon 41523.59 34055 -18%
33 Paradise III 24449 43928 80%
34 Poblacion 1627 774 -52%
35 Poblacion I 6937.5 5227 -25%
36 San Isidro - - -
37 San Manuel 10220 1096 -89%
38 San Martin I 225 210 -7%
39 San Martin II 265 - -100%
40 San Martin III 163.8 450 175%
41 San Martin IV 691 189 -73%
42 San Pedro 2027 2660 31%
43 San Rafael I 726 1728 138%
44 San Rafael II - 248 -
45 San Rafael III 208 - -100%
46 San Rafael IV 246 299 22%
47 San Rafael V - - -
48 San Roque - - -
49 Sta. Cruz I 1312 2567 96%
50 Sta. Cruz II 335 - -100%
51 Sta. Cruz III - - -
52 Sta. Cruz IV 468 686 47%
53 Sta. Cruz V 351 399 14%
54 Sto. Cristo 55643.32 17647 -68%
55 Sto. Niño I - 417 -
56 Sto. Niño II - - -
57 Sapang Palay Proper 3677 9331 154%
58 San Martin De Porres - - -
59 Tungkong Mangga 10029.18 104487 942%
TOTAL 306,992.98 314,913 3%
30
Population Distribution of Bulacan
According to a report of CMCI DTI, the Bulacan, Region III is estimated to have a population of
approximately 3,369,466. Figure 2-1 illustrates the bar chart for the LGU Score Percentage of Population as
of 2020. Moreover, the city of San Jose Del Monte has a population of approximately 559,331, wherein the
percentage is at 16.6%.
Figure 2-1. LGU Score Percentage of Bulacan

Source: Department of Trade and Industry Website
Historical Growth Population of San Jose Del Monte City

The Table 2-2 shows that the city of San Jose del Monte, Bulacan, has a 3.64 percent growth in
population, which is estimated to be an additional 138,746 people from the year 2000 to the most recent
census in 2010.
Table 2-2. Total Population of San Jose Del Monte

Source: City of San Jose Del Monte Website
2000 2010 2015 2020
City of San Jose
315,807 454,553 543,528 649,918
Del Monte
31
Population Distribution by Barangay
Barangay Tungkong Mangga is one of the most inhabited barangays. Tungkong Mangga was ranked
in the top 10 with 13,220 population in the year of 2015. The ranking was then raised to top 9 due to an
increase in population with 17,034 recorded by the year 2020.
Table 2-3. Total Population by Barangay of San Jose Del Monte

Source: City of San Jose Del Monte Website
Barangay Population
2015 2020 2025
1 Minuyan Proper 81,971 197,804 477,659
2 Muzon 107,355 140,642 184,285
3 Sto. Cristo 37,376 47,634 60,702
4 Graceville 32,018 35,891 40,230
5 Kaypian 30,041 35,234 41,315
6 Citrus 26,260 33 ,024 41,521
7 Gaya-Gaya 18,825 25,816 35,406
9 San Manuel 14,979 18,330 22,428
10 Tungkong Mangga 13,220 17,034 21,949
Topography and Elevation

Figure 2-2 depicts topographic map of San Jose del Monte, Bulacan, the color is around light blue to
sea level.
Figure 2-2. San Jose Del Monte City Topography Map

Source: https://en-nz.topographic-map.com/maps/or32/San-Jose-del-Monte/
32
See Figure 2-3
Mangga, San Jose del Monte, Bulacan, and it is located at the coordinates 14.78 degrees north latitude and
121.11 degrees east longitude with an altitude of 153 meters above sea level.
Figure 2-3. Tungkong Mangga Elevation Map

Source: https://elevationmap.net/tungkong-mangga-san-jose-del-monte-bulacan-ph-1001546282
33
Soil Map
The Bureau of Soil and Water Management (BSWM) categorized the soil types found in the city of San
Jose Del Monte. The soil types found in CSJDM are Sibul Clay, Novaliches Clay Loam, and Novaliches
Loam. The part where the Baranggay of Tungkong Mangga stands on was a soil made from Novaliches Clay
Loam, as seen in Figure 2-4.
Figure 2-4. San Jose Del Monte Soil Map

34
Geological Map
Partida Formation is the geological type of Tungkong Mangga, as seen in Figure 2-5.
Figure 2-5. San Jose Del Monte Geological Map

35
Hazards
Landslide and Erosion Susceptibility
Figure 2-6 depicts the City of San Jose Del Monte rain induced landslide hazard map, the area of
Tungkong Mangga portrays mostly yellow and purple colors which means that the area has low to moderate
susceptibility to landslide and erosion.
Figure 2-6. CSJDM City Rain Induced Landslide Hazard Map

Source: Provincial Disaster Coordinating Council Website
36
Flood Hazard
The zone of San Jose Del Monte City exhibits purple hues in Figure 2-7, indicating that there is no
or low to moderate flood susceptibility. Moreover, the high elevation of San Jose Del Monte City
contributes to the city's low flood susceptibility. On Figure 2-8, it shows the zoomed in data on where
the project location and its area is assessed, it shows that it has no susceptability at all and the location
is high enough to prevent flood for entering the facility.
Figure 2-7. Bulacan Flood Hazard Map

Source: Provincial Disaster Coordinating Council Website
Figure 2-8. Zoom in (Bulacan 5-year Floor Hazard Map)

Source: LiPAD: LiDAR Portal for Archiving and Distribution
37
Earthquake Hazard
Figure 2-9 shows the Tungkong Mangga nearest fault line, the distance amid the West Valley Fault
and the location of the design structure is 5.6 km. Thus, resulting to low susceptibility of earthquake damage
to structure.
Figure 2-9. Tungkong Mangga City Nearest Fault Line

Source: Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) and Geological Survey of Japan
(GSJ) Website
38
Geotechnical Investigation Report (SJDM)
Figure 2-10 shows the borehole test location plan, and Figure 2-11 shows the final boring log of the
borehole test. In addition, the geotechnical investigation report was made in the year 2020. With this the
designers concludes that the soil profile type of the project is SD.
Figure 2-10. Borehole Location Plan

Source: Core Land Specialist and Development Co.
39
Figure 2-11. Final Boring Log
Source: Core Land Specialist and Development Co.
40
Proposed Plan Layout
This section shows the proposed plan layout for the project. The designers got the inspiration for the
proposed plan layout from the Community Conservation Centers Berkeley Recycling located at 2 nd and
Gilman Streets, Berkeley, California. The proposed plan layout is also in accordance with the Philippines RA
9003, specifically the following:
Article 2, Section 22 which states that there shall be a separate container for each type of waste from
all sources and the container shall be properly marked or identified for on-site collection.
Article 4, Section 32 which states that there shall be a MRF in every barangay thus, a certain parcel
of land for the MRF shall be allocated by the barangay or the clusters of barangays. The MRF shall
receive mixed waste for final sorting, segregation, composting, and recycling. The resulting residual
wastes shall be transferred to a long-term storage or disposal facility or sanitary landfill.
Article 4, Section 33 which states that the building and land layout be designed to accommodate
efficient and safe materials processing, movement, and storage, and to allow efficient and safe
external access and to accommodate internal flow.
Site Development Plan
Figure 2-12. Site Development Plan of the Project
41
Floor Plan
Figure 2-13. Ground to Second Floor Plan of the Project
Elevation Plan
Figure 2-14. Front and Right-Side Elevation of the Project
42
Figure 2-15. Front and Left Side Elevation of the Project
Design Loads
This section shows the design load parameters for the design of this project.
Dead Loads
The dead loads of a structure are loads that remain constant over time. It comprises the self-weight
of the structure and the superimposed dead loads, which are fixed elements added to the dead weight
of the structure.
Self-Weight
The self-weight is a permanent load on the structure imposed by its own weight. The components
for the self-weight of the structure are stated ASEP Steel Handbook based on the selected steel section.
Superimposed Dead Loads

The designers determined the components for the superimposed dead loads using their discretion,
existing plans, and provisions as specified in NSCP 2015 Table 204-2 Minimum Design Dead Loads in
kPa.
43
Table 2-4. Superimposed Dead Loads
Source: NSCP 2015 Vol. 1
Component Material Load (kPa)
Slab (100mm thick) Concrete 2.40
Deck (gauge 18) Steel 0.14
Ceramic or Quarry Tile on 13
Floor Finish 1.10
mm Mortar Bed
Partitions Frame 1
Roof Sheeting Panel Steel 0.06
Purlins Steel 0.10
Mechanical Duct Allowance Steel 0.20
Total 5.0
Live Loads
The live loads of a structure are loads that may vary over time. It is often of the weight of people or
goods and the action of the equipment and vehicles. It is determined by the designers using the
provisions as specified in NSCP 2015 Table 205-1 Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Live Loads.
Table 2-5. Minimum Uniform Live Loads

Component Load (kPa)
Access Floor Systems (Office Use) 2.4
Roof 1.0
Manufacturing (Heavy) 12.0
Office (Other offices) 2.4
Catwalk for Maintenance Access 1.9
Restroom 2.4
Storage (Heavy) 12.0
Wind Load Parameters

The wind loads are environmental loads that the wind exerts on a structure. This design load is
designers determined the parameters using the provisions specified in NSCP 2015 Section 207 Wind
Loads.
Table 2-6. Wind Load Parameters

Factor Value
Wind Speed 260 kph
Occupancy Category Standard Occupancy Structure
Importance Factor, I 1.0
Wind Directionality Factor, Kd 0.85
Wind Exposure Category Category C
Gust Effect Factor, G 0.85
Topographic Factor, Kzt 1.0
Internal Pressure Coefficient, GCpi ±0.18
44
Seismic Load Parameters
The seismic loads are environmental loads exerted on a structure from earthquake-generated
agitation. This design load is considered to design an earthquake-resistant structure to protect against
significant structural damage. The designers determined the parameters using the provisions specified
in NSCP 2015 Section 208 Earthquake Loads.
Table 2-7. Wind Load Parameters

Factor Value
Seismic Zone, Z 0.40
Soil Profile Type SD
Importance Factor, I 1.0
Seismic Source Type Type A
Near-source Factor, Na 1.176
Near-source Factor, Nv 1.552
Seismic Coefficient, Ca 0.32 NA
Seismic Coefficient, Cv 0.32 NV
Numerical Coefficient, R (SMRF) 8.0
Numerical Coefficient, R (Bracings) 6.0
Numerical Coefficient, Ct 0.0853
2.2 Review of Related Literature
Special Moment Resisting Frame

Special moment frames connections are one of the strongest and most stable connections available.
They are specially engineered to withstand the inelastic deformation that occurs in the members when they
are subjected to lateral forces and are therefore extremely durable (Civil Jungle, n.d). It is also said that
Special Moment Resisting Frames structures behave well in earthquake than Ordinary Moment Resisting
Frames structures. (Rai et. al., 2017)
The Bending moment can affect its bending measurement especially when an external force is
applied. The Design which can also be called the moment design must be considered if there is an overhang
or projection from a normal building frame. Furthermore, (Chan et. al., 2011) have studied that each section's
classification is divided into two categories: stiffened and unstiffened elements. A central web is sandwiched
between flanges that are composed from top to bottom and in an I-beam or W section. In general, it is
preferred to have compact sections in the beams since compact beams are less likely to buckle, which is a
desirable attribute in beams. However, because of the columns support vertical loads, it is needed to have a
non-compact design. Furthermore, the columns will be buried, the noncompact frames will allow for elastic
buckling which is ideal for an earthquake.
Rafezy (2017) stated that Steel special moment frame connectors can be designed in a variety of
ways. Without the necessity for project-specific testing, they can be used. It is made up of when developed
and constructed in accordance with the Seismic Provisions, a sequence of connections that are prequalified
45
to meet the standards of the Seismic Provisions in compliance with this standard's requirements. He also
added that the standard's prequalified connections are designed to resist inelastic deformation largely
through controlled yielding. This goal is achievable, as evidenced by the prequalified connections; this can
be done by either strengthening or weakening the connection.
Moment frames is allowable and preferred rather than shear walls because they are more flexible
especially in an earthquake. A non-flexible part related to the frame is recommendable to be constructed so
that it will accept the additional movement to avoid damage. The choice of a particular type of framing system
is influenced by two main factors: the zone's seismic risk and the budget. The distribution of lateral forces
exerted on any structure is determined by the individual component's flexural rigidity.
For conventional office steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames, Hwang and
Lignos (2017) presented an analytical assessment that quantifies projected earthquake-induced losses. The
predicted loss estimations based on analytical models that disregard composite beam effects and the inner
gravity framing system of a steel frame structure may be greatly exaggerated for low probability seismic
occurrences.
Earthquake threats cause extensive structural damage and widespread failure. When lateral
resistance is required, moment-resistant frames are commonly used. The panel zone and beam to column
junction models are used as analytical models. Incremental dynamic analysis is then used to examine the
frames' structural dynamic behavior and create performance statistics. In some cases, a ductile construction
with a higher behavior factor may outperform a rigid structure. Even if special moment resistant frames are
predicted to perform better after ductility is achieved, the degree of superiority may be investigated,
particularly from a performance-based design approach. (Asgarian et al., 2009)
Table 2-8. Advantages and Disadvantages of Special Moment Resisting Frame System
Advantages Disadvantages
Ensures that the joint connection between Considerably expensive to construct.
the beam and the column is ductile. The method of stabilization is not as decent
Compared to braced frames, moment as braced frames
resistant frames have more deformation
capacity and less stiffness.
Chevron Bracing System (Inverted V-Bracing System)

As knowledge of the concentrically braced frame (CBF) grew in the 1980s, many new researchers
set out to examine its properties and the significance of its implementation. Meaning that realizing strength
increase by simple structural design will result in brittle characteristics and substantial structural damages
during major seismic events. (Razak et al., 2018)
When utilizing the yield or buckling of the braces in a structural system, there is a bracing system
that a designer of a structure can uses to make sure of, and that is called the Chevron bracing system. In
this system the structural components, such as beams and columns have a poor post-buckling tendency but
there is a one advantage of it which is, it is elastic. When a story's bracing buckling occurs, the perpendicular
forces act to the midpoint of the span of the beam, causing damage to concentrate on that story. Chevron
(inverted-V) braced frames is one of the best options even though it has a low seismic performance. In steel
46
building structures, this is a common way to resist lateral loads. When the ground is shaken violently by an
ojected that the bracing will bend and lose their compressive strength Robert and Tremblay
(n.d).
The lateral forces and earthquake loads are typically assumed to be resisted by braced framed
constructions. Because of their strength, braced systems add stiffness to the structure. Because the diagonal
member parts function in axial stress, they give additional stiffness against horizontal shear.
In steel building structures, chevron braced frames are used to resist lateral seismic loads. A
combination of gravity loading and tension acting bracing is projected to cause the compression braces to
buckle and the beams to bend downward. When beams are not designed to carry this net vertical load, a
plastic hinge forms at their mid-span before the tension braces achieve their yield tensile strength.
(Robert,1999)
Chevron bracing supports two braces that are framed into the beam at opposite angles. The chevron
braces provide a high level of elastic stiffness and strength. Chevron is also a useful architectural element.
The braced beam, on the other hand, is subjected to an unbalanced force. This is owing to the fact that the
compression braces bend during earthquakes, but the tension braces remain in place to support the tension
force.
Brace buckling in inverted-V-braced frames induces the vertical unbalanced force. The columns
within the braced bay ought to be design, per the capability style conception, to stay elastic for gravity load
actions and extra column axial forces that result from the brace buckling. The vertical unbalanced forces
within the stories detected as high buckling potential square measure then summed in a linear manner. (Cho,
2018)
Elastic deflection can be caused by tension and compression bracing with an unequal distribution of
force. Because of the deterioration of the braces, the overall braces frame has poor performance. As a result,
at each level of the braces bay, one brace resists tension while the other braces are compressed. In the
elastic region before the buckling point, they distribute the lateral stress equally. However, after buckling, the
compression braces lost all of their axial load capacity, whereas the tension braces remained in tension. This
contributed to the imbalanced distribution of lateral loads and created a significant bending moment at the
junction of beams and braces. (Razak et al., 2018)
Khatib et al. (1988) sought that conventionally built concentric steel frames might behave in
unwanted ways. Because of this, they often exhibit quick redistribution of internal forces, loss of strength,
inclination to create soft tales, and fracture due to excessive deformation demand. The parameters
influencing these events are identified. A simplified capacity design approach for proportioning columns and
connections is also recommended. Chevron-braced structures are optimized to improve seismic response.
New structural system alterations are presented. These include double-story X-braced framing, a secondary
moment-resistant frame, and V-braced braces. Each strategy offers merits in specific situations. Each has
drawbacks that may be assessed using analytical parametric research. The efficiency of a new structural
system that includes vertical connection elements into a traditional chevron-braced frame is studied.
47
Table 2-9. Advantages and Disadvantages of Chevron Bracing System
The lateral stiffness of the Chevron Bracing The Chevron Bracing System is less
System is lower than that of the CBF, successful than other braced frame
particularly when diagonally bracing, methods in reducing lateral displacement.
because the eccentrically braced sections To build these frames, skilled workers are
are more ductile needed.
To reduce energy loss, the Chevron
Bracing System is used
Cross-Bracing System
Tafheem and Khusru (2013) found out in a study that concentric X-bracing minimizes more lateral
displacement and so considerably contributes to increased structural stiffness compared to eccentric (V)
bracing, according to a new study published in the journal Structure. Providing a bracing system can also
greatly reduce inter-story drift. To summarize, it can be stated that the bracing system exerts a greater
influence over the restriction on relative floor-to-floor movement. Such that BRBs dissipate most of the
vibration energy through inelastic deformation while other structural components stay elastic and
undamaged, is confirmed by the study results.
Cross-Bracing System is consisting of two diagonal components that cross each other and are only
required to resist stress. Depending on the loading direction, a single courageous works quickly to oppose
sideways forces. Steel cables may be used for cross-bracing as a result. Cross-bracing on the building's
exterior can disrupt the position and function of openings (doors and windows), causing floor beams to bend
more significantly. Braces are small and solely counter tension pressures; they do not combat compression
forces. As a result, tensile components provide the necessary lateral stability, and the floor beams serve as
part of the bracing system. It is then viable in the structures such as a Material Recovery Facility since it
provides protection and withstands a stress for certain loads.
In the dissertation conducted by Grover (2017), a steel structure is peculiar if it has no cross bracing
because of its versatility and intended purposes. With the different connection they still cannot provide
enough support with each section. This bracing uses and applies existing support rather of creating costly
additional support structures.
When finding and determining for a bracing that is utilized in an earthquake prone location, Cross-
bracing is one of the best options. This is because structures in these places must be more robust than those
in other areas. As a result, cross-bracing is generally a last resort. Daily, buildings can function without it, but
if a building is destabilized by an earthquake, the one thing that will make it still will be the cross-bracing.
In the study of Sabouri-Ghomi and Ebadi (2008). They introduced that X-Bracing can also have a
different material, and then they stated that, bending deflections can range from a few millimeters to several
hundred millimeters.
A combination of different sorts of linked systems can be used to control a system successfully. The
shear deflection, on the other hand, is controlled. Buildings' shear stiffness can be increased. The notion of
easy-going steel (EGS) is discussed for improving the behavior of X-bracing systems. The application of this
X-Brace design principle can raise the lateral stiffness of buildings while lowering the lateral stiffness.
48
Consequently, the columns will be shielded from entering a statistical condition and the forces and energy
that will be coming from it will be controlled. The area beneath the energy dissipation capacity of this system
increases significantly as the hysteresis curves increase.
Lacerte and Christopolous (2008) have used and presented a direct displacement design for steel
frames with buckle-restrained bracing. The basic frame of the proposed building system is hinged together,
and the bracing is designed to withstand all lateral forces. Under the force of a seismic event, the buckling-
restrained bracing buckles to disperse its dynamic energy. To simulate structures for testing purposes, a
displacement-based method of seismic design was used. Two false seismic records are generated during
the design spectrum analysis, and the response spectra generated from the data are employed in the design
process. Time-history analysis has also been used to confirm that the maximum displacements match the
desired displacements.
Table 2-10. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cross-Bracing System

The ability to reduce lateral movement.
Since it is a main component, it is difficult to
It is cost-effective, takes up less space, and
replace or repair despite its high capacity
can be designed to fulfill the requisite
for energy dissipation
strength and stiffness requirements.
More structural study and evaluation are
Wind and seismic forces are resisted far
required for the cross bracing (X- Bracing)
more effectively than in non-braced
system
buildings
49
Chapter 3: Design Constraints, Trade-offs, and Standards
3.1 Design Constraints
Quantitative Constraints
Economic Constraints (Material Cost and Labor Cost)
Economic constraints involve the allocation of budget and resources for the project. This constraint
affects the functionality, quality, safety, functionality, and performance of the project. Insufficient or
ineffective budget and resource allocation can have a negative impact on the development of the project.
Hence, the cost of the materials needs to be considered. The designers imposed this constraint to
examine that the cost of the project design is within the budget set by the client while ensuring that the
safety of the structure and the quality of the materials to be used is maintained.
The designers introduced several trade-offs to address this constraint while keeping in mind the
budget of the client. The trade-offs include the cross-bracing system, v-bracing system, and chevron
bracing system.
Limitations: The client estimates that the project would cost Php 15,000,000.00 only.
Constructability Constraints (Duration in Days)

Constructability constraints refer to how the construction project can be completed in an easy and
efficient manner while still meeting the construction codes and standards. Assessing potential
construction obstacles and providing solutions prevents possible construction errors, delays, and in turn,
higher construction costs. The designers imposed this constraint to ensure that the project design will
be cost-effective and time efficient.
To address this constraint, the designers would use man-hours or days of completion to evaluate
which one among the trade-offs would produce the shortest construction duration which would lessen
the labor cost needed.
Limitations: The project's construction time should not exceed 150 days.
Sustainability Constraints (Maintenance Cost)

Sustainability constraints refer to the use of resources in construction without compromising the
natural environment around the site. It also involves the impact of the structure on the natural
environment over its lifespan. Hence, the maintenance cost of the structure is considered to prolong its
lifespan.
The designers aim to design a sustainable structure. Hence, the designers would assess which one
among the trade-offs would be most resource efficient in terms of maintenance cost for the structure in
addressing this constraint.
Limitations: The structure's design life must be at least 50 years.
50
Risk Assessment Constraints (Story Drift)
Risk assessment is defined as the identification and evaluation of risk factors that have the potential
to cause harm and determining the measures to control or eliminate said risks. This constraint is to
ensure that the structure will be able to sustain its stability and safety. The safety factor is vital to be
considered in designing a structure to minimize the effects of the risks present.
The designers considered that the buckling factor is the main hazard to the structure. This is due to
environmental loads which affects the structural integrity of the MRF. As the structural integrity declines,
the occupants of the structure will be at risk. Thus, the designers aim to design a structure that will be
resistant against lateral loads. The retrofitting cost shall be used as the value for this constraint.
Limitations: The structure story drift must not exceed the values (0.025 x story height) prescribed in
the National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015.
Safety
This constraint refers to the design safety percentages. It is considered a hazardous activity working
in construction sites such as working at heights. Thus, this constraint determines factors of lateral
displacement that may cause an accident during construction and to conform the safety laws to protect
the lives of the workers. The designers must give an importance on the safeties of the employees and
the construction site.
Limitations: The structure's design safety percentage must be at least one hundred percent (100%).
Uncertainty
This constraint refers to the uncertainty percentages difference of story drift. The possibility of
earthquake is uncertain; thus, this constraint determines the uncertainty percentage factor that the
possibility of story displacement due to earthquake might happen and cause accident. The designers
must give an importance on the safeties of the structure and the persons using it.
Limitations: The structure's uncertainty percentage shall not exceed a hundred percent (100%).
Qualitative Constraints
Social Constraints
Social constraints refer to the components that may happen due to increased public opinion, interest,
or opposition on a project. This concern from the public greatly affects the decision of both the client
and designer which might lead to alteration of original design plans and project completion dates. The
project is subjected to this constraint as it is funded by the government and may entail greater interest
from the public.
51
Environmental Constraints
Environment constraints refer to the factors concerning pollution, usage of any hazardous or
sustainable materials, and waste management. The project aims in designing a material recovery facility
which involves the usage of resources and energy to construct leading to pollution which harms the
natural environment. To address this constraint, the designers shall evaluate which trade-off is the most
sustainable trade-off.
Functionality Constraints
Functionality constraints refer to the quality of the structure to perform the purpose for which it is
made. For a structure to be functional, it must be designed to perform its purpose effectively. As a
material recovery facility, it must aid in solid waste management. To address this constraint, the
designers shall ensure that the design of the structure would have the safety, strength, and capacity to
process and produce recyclable materials.
3.2 Design Trade-offs
3.2.1 Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
Figure 3-1. Special Moment Resisting Frame System
The Special Moment-Resisting Frame System, often known as the SMRF, is a type of frame system
that is designed to give ductile behavior. The ductility of concrete is the ability of the material to flex without
cracking under load. High confining pressures, high temperatures, and low strain rates all work together to
make concrete more ductile. Beam, column, and beam-column joints are designed to resist flexural and axial
movements during intense earthquake ground shaking, which necessitates the use of special moment-
resistant frames.
52
3.2.2 Chevron Bracing Frame System
Figure 3-2. Chevron Bracing System
The diagonal members of the Chevron Bracing System form an inverted V when they extend
downward from the two topmost corners of a horizontal member and meet in the middle of the lower horizontal
member. Use with a compression brace substantially reduces it to less than the tension yield capacity of a
tension brace when used in conjunction. Braces may have to be resisted in the horizontal member's bending
rather than the braces themselves after their resistance capacity has been reached.
53
3.2.3 Cross-Bracing System
Figure 3-3. Cross-Bracing System
The X-Bracing is made up of two diagonal members that cross over one another. Construction of
braces from the right-hand corner of the ground up to the left-hand corner of the ceiling, followed by a
repetition of the process in the other direction, is a sort of structural reinforcement. As a result, an X-shaped
brace is generated, which pulls the ground and ceiling against each other, increasing the structural stability
of the structure overall. Structures that have horizontal cross bracing installed on their faces, on the other
hand, will have problems with the location and operation of window openings. Furthermore, it results in higher
bending of floor beams as a result.
3.3 Multiple Constraints using Initial Normalization Method
After the evaluation of the initial estimate, a rough computation was applied. The scale or weight of
each criterion is determined by the designers' perspective and the client's specifications. The equation to be
used for the ability to fulfill the criteria in Normalized Data calculation is:
The weight percentage is determined based on the optimal percentages of each performance
parameter as agreed upon, depending on the resulted value. All criteria used in the trade-off calculation
should be up to 100 percent (100%).
The design trade-off with the highest total value for each context will be used in the design.
54
Raw Data
Table 3-1. Raw Data
Constructabili Sustainability Uncertainty
Economic
ty (Maintenance Risk Assessment Safety (Dependence
Trade-off Material Cost
(Days of Cost in 50 (Story Drift, mm) (>=100%) Percentage,
(Php)
work) years in Php) <=100% )
Special
Moment
8,760,750.00 81 1,307,279.115 70.87 100% 100%
Resisting
Frame
Chevron
Bracing
9,952,212.00 85 1,485,069.075 31.24 155.92% 44.08%
Frame
System
Cross-
Bracing
10,863,330.00 88 1,624,026.103 35.56 149.82% 50.18%
Frame
System
Table 3-1 demonstrates the data associated with various limitations for each tradeoff to be
considered to arrive at a suitable design. The designers used the data of Philcon Prices to identify the prices
of each material used for the construction. For the Economic cost, the three different trade-offs have different
with its respective percentage. For sustainability constraint it is obtained by its life span with a constant of 50
years for all trade-offs on the other hand the maintenance cost can be determine by multiplying it on the
percentage of the total project cost to the material and lifespan. For constructability constraint, it is based on
the data of the designers for the number of workers and number of days for it to be constructed then
identifying the average daily labor for workers. Constraint data were obtained from an estimation of risk
assessment estimates according to Fixr (2019), on the other hand safety percentages were based upon the
research to the past studies regarding to the story drift since it is concern with the displacement,
the higher the value of percentage then the safer it will be. The percentage of it is considered greater or equal
to 100%. Finally, the uncertainty was based upon the possibility of earthquake happening that might cause
accidents. The higher the uncertainty percentage the more uncertain the design structure will be and is based
on story drift. See Appendix A for data and computations.
55
Normalized Data
Table 3-2. Normalized Data
Risk
Sustainability
Economic Assessmen Uncertainty
Constructability Safety
Trade-off Cost (Cost in (Maintenance t
(Dependence
Php) (Days of work) Cost in 50 (>=100%)
(Story Drift, Percentage)
years in Php)
mm)
Special
Moment
10.00 10.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Resisting
Frame
Chevron
Bracing Frame 4.90 4.86 4.95 10.00 10.00 10.00
System
Cross- Bracing
1.00 1.00 1.00 9.02 9.02 9.02
Frame System
Table 3-2 shows the normalized data which is based on the formula of normalization, and it briefly shows
the ranking of which the trade-off is favored, which is also based on each constraint thus it allows us to
compare it.
First Weighted Sum of Various Percentage Weight

Table 3-3. First Weighted Sum of Various Percentage
Special Moment
Chevron Bracing Cross Bracing
Constraints Weight Resisting
System Frame System
System
Economic Cost 0.2 10.00 4.90 1.00
Constructability
0.15 10.00 4.86 1.00
(Days of Work)
Sustainability
(Maintenance Cost 0.15 10.00 4.95 1.00
in 50 years)
Risk Assessment 0.2 1.00 10.00 9.02
56
Safety 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.02
Uncertainty 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.02
Weighted Sum 1 5.5 7.45 5.01
Table 3-3 shows the 1st weighted sum of various percentage on which it is solved by using the weighted
high mark on the Economic and Risk Chevron bracing received the
highest weighted because the weight of each constraint is also a factor on it.
Second Weighted Sum of Various Percentage Weight

Table 3-4. Second Weighted Sum of Various Percentage
Special Moment
System Frame System
System
Economic Cost 0.2 10.00 4.90 1.00
Constructability
0.2 10.00 4.86 1.00
(Days of Work)
Sustainability
in 50 years)
Risk Assessment 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.02
Safety 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.02
Uncertainty 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.02
Weighted Sum 1 5.95 7.19 4.61
57
Table 3-4
preference, it is based on perspective of the client where they want put importance to it. Therefore, the costs
and days of work were prioritized and have a 0.2 value which is the highest among the rest. Overall, the
Chevron Bracing have the highest value since it is also where it is the one with lowest story and values in
terms of safety and uncertainty, which is also high in terms of weight.
Third Weighted Sum of Various Percentage Weight

Table 3-5. Third Weighted Sum of Various Percentage
Special Moment
System Frame System
System
Economic Cost 0.17 10.00 4.90 1.00
Constructability
0.17 10.00 4.86 1.00
(Days of Work)
Sustainability
in 50 years)
Risk Assessment 0.17 1.00 10.00 9.02
Safety 0.16 1.00 10.00 9.02
Uncertainty 0.16 1.00 10.00 9.02
Weighted Sum 1 5.59 7.39 4.93
Table 3-5 shows the result of the third weighted sum of various percentage on which it is based on
equal preferences that the weight is almost the same it just differs on what is most important but still a close
value, thus the Chevron Bracing have the highest weighted sum.
Overall Trade-off Assessment
The trade-offs are evaluated and computed based on the tables, the best among the rest is the
Chevron Bracing System
preferences, and equal preference. Thus, we can conclude that it is the best design option to use and can
be used for the Materials Recovery Facility.
58
3.4 Trade-off Assessment
Economic Constraints (Material Cost and Labor Cost)

For the economic constraints, the designers have decided to use the Special Moment Resisting Frame
(SMRF) since it has the lowest value for material cost among the other trade-offs. The initial cost estimate
for using SMRF is Php 8,760,750.00.
Constructability Constraints (Schedule and Labor Cost)

The designers have decided to utilize the Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) for this constraint as
it offers the shortest construction duration that is based on the results of trade-off assessment. The initial
construction duration for using SMRF is 81 days.
Sustainability Constraints (Lifespan and Maintenance Cost)

The designers have decided to use Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF) when considering the
lifespan and maintenance cost of the material. While all three trade-offs have the same estimated lifespan
which is 50 years, the SMRF has the lowest maintenance cost among the three trade-offs, which is estimated
to be Php 1,307,279.115.
Risk Assessment Constraints (Story Drift)

The designers have decided to use the Chevron Bracing Frame System when considering for the
structural integrity and story drift. According to the constraint results, the Chevron Bracing Frame System has
the lowest Story Drift among the trade-offs, which is estimated to be at 31.24 mm.
Safety
The designers have decided to that the Chevron Bracing System where best among the rest since when
considering the safety of structure, it has the highest result which is greater than 100% with the estimation of
155.92%.
Uncertainty
The Chevron Bracing Frame System was considered for the uncertainty percentage based on the data
the lowest
uncertainty percentage among the trade-offs, which is estimated to be at 44.08%
Overall Assessment of Trade-offs
The trade-
Chevron Bracing system, it is because of the consideration between the different constraints that allows the
designers to compare and choose the best trade-off to be used in structures such as the MRF.
59
3.5 Design Codes and Standards
Design Codes and Standards provide the requirements, design provisions, and analysis for a specific
material used. The group designed a two-story Material Recovery Facility at Tungkong Mangga, San Jose
Del Monte, Bulacan. The codes and standards followed by the designers are:
National Structural Code of the Philippines Volume 1, Seventh Edition 2015

The National Structural Code of the Philippines establishes the rules, minimum criteria, standards, and
provisions for structural design. The code is designed to protect community health and safety across the
country through a variety of codes and regulations.
1. Minimum Design of Dead Loads: NSCP 2015 Section 204 (Table 204-2. Minimum Design Dead
Loads (kPa))
2. Minimum Design of Live Loads: NSCP 2015 Section 205 (Table 205-1. Minimum Uniform and
Concentrated Live Load)
3. Wind Load Parameters: NSCP 2015 Section 207
4. Seismic Load Parameters: NSCP 2015 Section 208
5. Materials:
a.
National Building Code of the Philippines

The National Building Code of the Philippines, which was also called as the Presidential Decree No.
1096, was created to embody the modern methodology on construction, maintenance and building design.
The code issues the framework for the minimum standards and requirements to oversee the location,
The designers used the following sections of NBCP:

1. Types of Construction: NBCP Chapter IV, Section 401
2. Classification and General Requirement of All Buildings by Use of Occupancy: NBCP Chapter VII,
Section 701
3. Allowable Floor Areas: NBCP Chapter VII, Section 705
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines Steel Handbook Third Edition

Based on local steel market conditions, design practices, and technologically forced changes, this
guide specifies the available steel sections, properties, and specifications for the construction of steel
structures. It's also utilized as a design tool in the International System of Units (SI), which is consistent with
the National Structural Code of the Philippines.
60
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is a worldwide standards organization that
develops and publishes voluntary consensus technical standards for a wide range of materials, products,
systems, and services. The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) and the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials were two significant ASTM components.
Uniform Building Code 1997 (UBC) Chapter 16 of Division IV; Earthquake Design
The International Conference of Building Officials produces a series of codes that are all associated
with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) to give jurisdictions with a comprehensive set of building-related
regulations to adopt. The goal of the earthquake provisions and codes in this document is to protect against
significant structural failures and loss of life, not to limit damage or retain function, but to minimize the amount
of damage and casualties caused by an earthquake.
AISC 360-16 LRFD

The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) has devised a company-level certification
program for structural steel fabrication and construction. Based on the codes supplied, the designers utilize
AISC 360-16 LRFD to choose steel sections, steel connections, and assess the soundness of structural
elements.
61
Chapter 4: Design Methodology
4.1 Design Methodology
The design of the Materials Recovery Facility is composed of different engineering procedures that
will be able to determine the desirable parameters that are necessary for the design. The designers used
NSCP 2018 specifications, ASEP steel Handbook and the DENR environmental guidelines upon designing
the structure for the parameters. The parameters allow the designers to determine the limitations to design
the beams, columns, purlins and other necessary parts of the structure. The designers used the software
STAAD v8i and ETABS to initially model the structure. The software enables the designer to simulate the
initial design of the structure and determine if its structural members can be able to withstand the design
loads to it. Finally, the designers will also apply the different trade-offs with respect to its constraints to
determine the best one to be used. Figure 4-1 below shows the summary of the design methodology process.
Layout of the Structure
Floor Plans
Preliminary Layout
Design Criteria
Design Specification, Standards, and codes

structural members parameters
Structural Analysis
Software such as Etabs and STAAD

Application of the Design loads
Evaluation of the Design Constraints
Economic
Sustainability
Constructability
Risk Assessment
Safety
Uncertainty
Selection of the Final Design Trade-offs
Chevron Bracing Frame System

Cross-Bracing Frame System
Figure 4-1: Design Methodology

62
4.2 Design Process
Design for Beams

The design process for beams of the proposed structure is based accordingly to Section 506 of the National
Structural Code of the Philippines which is entitled as the design of members for flexure. It considers the
following limit states such as yielding, lateral torsional buckling, and compression flange local buckling.
63
Fv=
Figure 4-2: Design of Beams
64
Design of Columns
Design of column is also called as the design of compression member. The following design process is limited
only doubly symmetric shapes which will be used in the proposed structure.
= larger value from and
Cc=
= Cc
=
=
65
<
Figure 4-3: Design of Columns
66
Design of Connections
T= =
Figure 4-4: Design of Connections
67
Design for Member Sizing Optimization of Three Example Steel Moment Frames
START
Determine an initial Design
Perform structural Analysis
Strength Demand
Update member sizes
With Capacity? No based on the worse of
Yes the strength ratio and
Actual Drifts within stiffness ratio
Allowable limit?
Stopping No
Criterion
met?
END
Figure 4-5: Design for Member sizing optimization of three

example steel moment frames
68
Design of Brace Members
START
Application of load
combination
Yielding at Gross Section

Pu = Ø Pn
Pu = ØFuAg
Rupture at Net Section

Pu =PuØ Pn
Pu = ØFuAe
Preliminary Section
Pu
Actual Value > No

Adjust
Computed Value
Section
Yes
Check unit states
Actual Value > No

Computed Value
Yes
Pnmin, Pnmax
Pu = Ø Pn Final Design Sections
End
Figure 4-6: Design of Tensional Members
69
Design of Base Plate and Pedestal
Start
Input necessary parameters
Compute for Nominal Bearing Strength of Concrete:

On the full area of a concrete support:
On less than the area of a concrete support:

2
= 0.85 1
1
Required bearing strength <

design concrete bearing strength
No
Concrete section is
Yes
inadequate
Concrete section is adequate. Change concrete

dimension
Compute for eccentricity, e:
Assume plate section:
B = ___ N = ___
70
A
Assume effective depth, h:

h = 0.9N
Yes No
Check if
< /6
Case 1 Case 2
Small Moment Large Moment
Calculate plate cantilever lengths: Assume area of anchor rods in

( 0.95 ) the tension zone:
= 2
2
( 0.8 ) =
= 4
2
Calculate depth of the rectangular concrete

Compute for minimum and maximum stress block, a:
compressive stresses: 0.85 = + 0.75
, = 2 0
( 6 )
, = + Calculate base plate length, N:

2
( ) 0.5 + = 0.85 ( )
6 2
Calculate the maximum bearing pressure at a Calculate plate cantilever lengths:

distance m from the edge of the plate: ( 0.95 )
=
( ) 2
, = , +( , , ) ( 0.8 )
=
2
B C
71
Calculate the maximum bearing pressure at a distance m Calculate the maximum factored moment per
from the edge of the plate: unit width in the base plate:
2 2
1 2
, = , + ( , , )( )( ) = (0.85 )
2 2 3 2
Compute for required minimum base plate thickness: Compute for required minimum base plate thickness:
4 ,
4 ,
= =
Check the bending of the base plate in the tension

zone caused by the tension force:
=
= 0.75
Compute for required minimum base plate thickness:

4
=
Compute for plate thickness for uplift

force on the base plate:
For net uplift force on base plates with anchor

rods outside the column footprint:
( )
= 2
72
Compute for required minimum base plate thickness:
4
=
Get max for base plate thickness.
Check for tensile capacity of anchor rods.
Tensile capacity of anchor rods:

= 0.75
Required tension stress <

design tensile strength
No
Yes
Anchor rods are inadequate
Anchor rods are adequate against tension.
against tension.
Change rod diameter.
End
Figure 4-7: Design of Base Plate
73
For Pedestal:
Start
Input necessary parameters
Compute for the size of the pedestal:

2 =
0.175
Compute for Nominal Bearing Strength of Concrete:

On the full area of a concrete support:
= 0.85 1
On less than the area of a concrete support:
2
= 0.85 1 1.7 1
1
Required bearing stress < design

concrete bearing strength
No
Yes Concrete section is inadequate
Concrete section is adequate Change concrete dimension
Compute for number of longitudinal bars:

= 0.01
= 2
End
Figure 4-8: Design of Pedestal
74
Design of Footing
Start
Input Data
Assume hc
(Thickness of footing)
= ()
Footing Dimension
L = W,
= +
= +
= +
6 6
= + 2+ 2
6 6
= 2+ 3 + 3
L = W = ____
Factored Load
= +
= +
= +
6 6
= + 2
+ 2
75
A
=
No
Yes
Redesign
Safe
6 6
= + 2
+ 2
>0
No
Yes
Safe. Redesign.
6 6
2 = + 2
+ 2
6 6
3 = + 2
+ 2
( ( ) + ( ) + 2 + 3)
=
4
Check the adequacy of footing depth to carry the shear:

= . . Ø
a.) Wide-beam shear:

=
= ____
1
= = 0.75
6
= ____
76
B
=
No
Yes
Not safe in Beam Shear.
Safe in Beam Shear.
Redesign.
b.) Punching shear:
2 2
= +
= + 4
= (0.33)( )( ( )
>
No
Yes Not Safe in Punching Shear
Safe in Punching Shear

Redesign
Steel Requirements:
2
= ( )( )
2
=( 1)
= 2
)
77
C
0.85 2
= (1 1 )
0.85
1.4
=
If <
Steel Area, :
=
Quantity of Rebars:
=
Spacing of Main Bars:
2 ( )
=
1
Allowable Bearing Strength of

Concrete at Base of Column
= 0.85 1
= 1.2DL + 1.6LL
If F > Safe!
Allowable Bearing Strength of

Concrete Footing:
2
= 0.85 1
1
If 2
> 2 use 2
=2
1 1
F = ____
= 1.2DL + 1.6LL
If F > Safe!
78
D
Development Length of Footing
= ( )
1.7
( ) = ( )
Development Length of Dowel:
= 1
Development Length of Dowel:
(min )
=
( )
4
0.25
=
But not less than 0.04
= 0.04
Use larger value,
Proceed to Detailing
End
Figure 4-9: Design of Footing
79
4.3 Design Inputs
Initial Member Section and Properties

Table 4-1. Initial Members and Properties
Trial Sections
Structural Member Material SECTIONS
Beams Steel (A992) W16 x 31
Column Steel (A992) W14 x 30
Brace Steel (A992) L6X6X1
Load Specifications
This section shows the design load parameters for the design of this project.
Primary Loads
Table 4-2. Primary Loads
PRIMARY LOADS, LOAD COMBINATIONS, AND DRIFT LOAD COMBINATIONS
PRIMARY LOAD TITLE PARAMETERS
1 EQ+X Seismic at X Direction
2 EQ-X Seismic at X Direction
3 EQ+Z Seismic at Z Direction
4 EQ-Z Seismic at Z Direction
5 DL All Dead Loads
6 FLL Floor Live Loads
7 RLL Roof Live Loads
8 WL+X Wind at X Direction
9 WL-X Wind at X Direction
10 WL+Z Wind at Z Direction
11 WL-Z Wind at Z Direction
Ultimate Loads
A load combination sums or envelopes the analysis results of certain load cases. The designers will
determine the possible load combination that might occur and stresses the member most after analyzing the
primary loads. Table __ shows the primary loads and load combinations that the designers will use. These
are based on NSCP 2015, Section 203.
80
Table 4-3. Ultimate Loads
LOAD
DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS
COMBINATION
12 1.4DL Combination
13 1.2DL + 1.6LL+0.5RLL Combination
14 1.2DL + 0.5LL+1.6RLL Combination
15 1.2DL + 1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL Combination
16 1.2DL + 1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL Combination
17 1.2DL + 1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL Combination
18 1.2DL + 1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL Combination
19 0.9DL + 1.0EQ(+X) Combination
20 0.9DL + 1.0EQ(-X) Combination
21 0.9DL + 1.0EQ(+Z) Combination
22 0.9DL + 1.0EQ(-Z) Combination
23 0.9DL + 1.0WL(+X) Combination
24 0.9DL + 1.0WL(-X) Combination
25 0.9DL + 1.0WL(+Z) Combination
26 0.9DL + 1.0WL(-Z) Combination
27 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) Combination
28 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) Combination
29 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+Z) Combination
30 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-Z) Combination
Service Loads
Table 4-4. Service Loads
LOAD
DESCRIPTION PARAMETERS
COMBINATION
31 DL Combination
32 DL+FLL+RLL Combination
33 DL+0.75FLL+0.75RLL Combination
34 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+X)+FLL) Combination
35 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-X)+FLL) Combination
36 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+Z)+FLL) Combination
37 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-Z)+FLL) Combination
38 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+X)) Combination
39 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-X)) Combination
40 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+Z)) Combination
41 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-Z)) Combination
42 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+X)) Combination
81
43 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-X)) Combination
44 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+Z)) Combination
45 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-Z)) Combination
46 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+X)) Combination
47 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-X)) Combination
48 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+Z)) Combination
49 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-Z)) Combination
4.4 Design of Trade-off 1: Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
Design Geometry and Analysis
Geometric Modelling of Trade-off 1

Figure 4-10 shows the geometric model of the structure rendered from Staad.Pro Connect. Structural
elements can be seen in the figure such as beams, columns, and slabs. It is an 8.05 meters tall structure with
a length of 30 meters and a width of 15 meters.
Figure 4-10: 3D Model of the Project

Summary of Derived Forces, Moments, and Displacements of Trade-off 1
Each table below shows the support reactions, beams end forces, column end forces, intermediate beams
forces, and bracing forces. The designers will choose the maximum and minimum values of the most critical
member to be used in designing the safe, economical, and efficient section of each member.
82
Table 4-5. Table Summary of Force and Moments of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 1
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
(KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
2F
MAX 18.696 60.753 0 0.003 0 0
MIN -18.696 0 0 -0.003 0 0
Table 4-6. Summary of Force and Moments of Girders for Trade-off 1

GRID FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
LEVEL (KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
MAX 17.727 26.239 0.522 0.005 1.342 70.435
GRID A
MIN -17.727 -24.593 -0.522 -0.005 -1.266 -69.528
MAX 26.292 48.169 5.994 0.006 6.931 78.221
GRID B
MIN -26.292 -47.031 -5.994 -0.006 -6.931 -95.287
MAX 29.946 43.526 6.22 0.009 7.11 66.117
GRID C
MIN -29.946 -42.798 -6.22 -0.009 -7.11 -64.002
MAX 18.958 18.508 0.699 0.005 1.823 50.208
GRID D
MIN -18.958 -16.876 -0.699 -0.005 -1.865 -49.848
Table 4-7. Summary of Forces and Moments of Beams for Trade-off 1

FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
GRID VALUES
MAX 45.696 29.515 0.676 0.009 1.68 76.089
1-1
MIN -47.965 -59.933 -0.676 -0.009 -1.826 -104.566
MAX 47.895 53.553 0.452 0.008 1.084 82.591
2-2
2nd MIN -47.895 -59.992 -0.452 -0.008 -1.201 -111.23
To MAX 42.451 53.893 0.428 0.008 1.133 83.217
3-3
TR MIN -42.451 -59.932 -0.428 -0.008 -1.071 -111.017
F MAX 51.055 52.229 1.043 0.01 2.7 80.022
4-4
L MIN -51.055 -59.98 -1.043 -0.01 -2.668 -111.141
O MAX 49.39 53.661 0.386 0.007 0.994 82.642
O 5-5
MIN -49.39 -59.92 -0.386 -0.007 -1.016 -110.956
R MAX 41.202 53.734 0.452 0.008 1.179 82.919
S 6-6
MIN -41.202 -59.968 -0.452 -0.008 -1.015 -111.175
MAX 45.496 28.81 0.667 0.013 1.755 75.342
7-7
MIN -48.045 -59.449 -0.667 -0.013 -1.543 -102.859
Table 4-8. Summary of Forces and Moments of Columns for Trade-off 1

STORY FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
MAX 189.411 40.756 19.404 0.116 65.008 103.93
STORY 1
MIN -185.419 -30.153 -19.404 -0.116 -65.489 -87.877
83
MAX 99.708 48.009 20.584 0.303 33.759 111.226
STORY 2
MIN -99.708 -38.784 -20.584 -0.303 -34.079 -92.772
Table 4-9. Summary of Forces and Moments of Bracings for Trade-off 1

FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
ROOF (KN) (KN) (KN) (KN-m) (KN-m) (KN-m)
BRACINGS MAX 49.489 1.923 0 0 0 0
MIN -49.524 0 0 0 0 0
Table 4-10. Summary of Support Reaction for Trade-off 1

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
Node L/C My Mz kN-
Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN Mx kN-m
kN-m .m
Max 116
Fx 76 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) 35.498 40.796 -1.13 -1.137 0.321 -28.916
Min 115
Fx 78 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) -42.614 3.976 -1.237 -1.243 -0.009 39.317
Max
Fy 48 102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL -7.769 221.521 1.215 1.233 0.03 5.535
Min -
Fy 78 8 WL(+X) -29.123 101.254 -0.017 0.006 0.049 34.463
Max
Fz 117 11 WL(-Z) -0.513 -20.408 24.857 36.53 0.08 0.555
Min
Fz 62 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL -0.788 125.181 -23.909 -26.071 0.059 0.866
Max
Mx 117 11 WL(-Z) -0.513 -20.408 24.857 36.53 0.08 0.555
Min
Mx 62 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL -0.788 125.181 -23.909 -26.071 0.059 0.866
Max
My 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.911 70.725 -22.844 -25.918 1.448 -3.36
Min
My 76 4 EQ(-Z) -0.867 -0.014 21.719 24.776 -1.358 1.154
Max 115
Mz 34 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) -40.305 63.149 0.543 0.62 -0.017 60.434
Min
Mz 19 9 WL(-X) 30.084 -55.054 -0.003 -0.004 -0.008 -45.112
84
Table 4-11. Summary of Displacements for Trade-off 1
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Resultant Rotational
Node L/C
X mm Y mm Z mm mm rX rad rY rad rZ rad
Max
X 58 8 WL(+X) 44.128 0.199 0 44.128 0 -0.001 -0.001
Min
X 58 104 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL -30.271 -0.112 -1.372 30.302 0 0.001 0.002
Max
Y 29 8 WL(+X) 40.072 15.937 -0.002 43.125 0 0 0.001
Min
Y 44 102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL -4.316 -19.28 -0.358 19.76 0 0 0
Max
Z 115 3 EQ(+Z) -0.636 0.003 45.558 45.562 0.006 0 0
Min
Z 74 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -1.119 -0.14 -45.858 45.872 -0.004 0 0
Max
rX 115 3 EQ(+Z) -0.636 0.003 45.558 45.562 0.006 0 0
Min
rX 115 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL 0.426 -0.097 -45.731 45.733 -0.006 0 0
Max
rY 75 2 EQ(-X) -16.497 0.003 -0.296 16.5 0 0.006 0.003
Min
rY 75 103 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL 16.274 -0.159 0.543 16.284 0 -0.006 -0.003
Max
rZ 60 2 EQ(-X) -21.712 -0.001 -0.294 21.714 0 0 0.006
Min
rZ 91 8 WL(+X) 30.531 0.108 0.014 30.532 0 0.001 -0.007
Max
Rst 44 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -1.35 -12.455 -45.731 47.416 -0.003 0 0
Table 4-12. Story Drift Check for Trade-off 1

Average Displacement
DRIFT (mm)
Story Height (mm) STATUS
X Z X Z
BASE 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
2F 3.75 12.155 10.873 6.008 1.961 PASS
2TR 5.05 13.757 14.307 1.606 3.435 PASS
RB 6.75 16.837 14.759 3.515 0.841 PASS
TR 8.05 16.839 16.128 0.013 1.369 PASS
85
Design Results of Trade-off 1
The following tables below contains the design section of structural members, its location, quantity, and
dimensions.
Final Member Section and Properties of Trade-off 1

Table 4-13. Design Results of Member Section and Properties for SMRF
MEMBER SECTIONS AND PROPERTIES
Top Roof Beams at Z
Steel (A992) W16 x 31
Direction
Top Roof Beams at X Steel (A992)
W14 x 30
Direction
Beams at Z Direction Steel (A992) W16 x 31
2nd Floor Roof Beams at Steel (A992)
W12 x 30
X Direction
Mezzanine Beams Steel (A992) W12 x 26
Intermediate Beams Steel (A992) W12 x 19
Mezzanine Columns Steel (A992) W12 x 35
Outer Columns Steel (A992) W14 x 61
Inner Columns Steel (A992) W16 x 50
Roof Bracing Steel (A992) L8X8X1/2
Load Diagrams
The following figures show the generated load using STAAD Pro CONNECT Edition v22. These figures
indicate the primary loads, load combinations, and drift load combinations used by the designers in analyzing
the structure.
86
Primary Loads
Figure 4-11: Dead loads
Figure 4-12: Live loads
87
Figure 4-13: Wind Loads at X-Direction
Figure 4-14: Wind Loads at Z-Direction
88
Figure 4-15: Earthquake Load at + X Direction
Figure 4-16. Earthquake Load at - X Direction
89
Figure 4-17: Earthquake Load at + Z Direction
Figure 4-18: Earthquake Load at - Z Direction
90
Load Combinations
Figure 4-19. Governing Axial Force, Fx (1.2DL + 0.5FLL + 1.6RLL)
Figure 4-20. Governing Shear Force in Y-Axis, Fy (1.2DL + 1.6FLL + 0.5RLL)
91
Figure 4-21. Governing Shear Force in Z-Axis, Fz (0.9DL + 1.0WL(-Z))
Figure 4-22. Governing Bending Moment at X-Axis, Mx (1.2DL + 1.0EQ(+Z) + 0.5FLL)
92
Figure 4-23. Governing Bending Moment at Y-Axis, My (1.2DL + 1.0EQ(-Z) + 0.5FLL)
Figure 4-24. Governing Bending Moment at Z-Axis, Mz (0.9DL + 1.0WL(+X))
93
Beam Design of Trade-off 1
In designing the beam of the structure, the designers used STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition v22 to analyze
and design the section and reinforcement of the beam.
Figure 4-25. Beam Size Detailing for Trade-off 1
Table 4-14. Schedule of Beams along X-Direction for Trade-off 1

FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
FLOOR GRID SECTION QTY tw,
m bf, mm tf, mm depth, mm
mm
1-1 W12X30 1 5.1664 140.34 11.18 313.44 6.6
2-2 W12X30 1 5.1664 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
3-3 W12X30 1 5.1664 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
2TR 4-4 W12X30 1 5.1664 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
5-5 W12X30 1 5.1664 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
6-6 W12X30 1 5.1664 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
7-7 W12X30 1 5.1664 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
1-1 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
2-2 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
3-3 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
ROOF 4-4 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
5-5 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
6-6 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
7-7 W14X30 2 5.1664 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
94
Table 4-15. Schedule of Beams along Z-Direction for Trade-off 1
LENGTH, FLANGE WEB
FLOOR GRID SECTION QTY
m bf, mm tf, mm depth, mm tw, mm
A-A W16X31 6 5 140.34 11.18 403.35 6.99
B-B W12X26 2 2.5 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
B-B W12X26 2 1.6 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
B-B W12X26 1 1.8 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
2F
C-C W12X26 2 2.5 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W12X26 2 1.6 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W12X26 1 1.8 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
D-D W16X31 6 5 140.34 11.18 403.35 6.99
2TR C-C W16X31 6 5 140.34 11.18 403.35 6.99
A-A W16X31 6 5 140.34 11.18 403.35 6.99
RB
C-C W16X31 6 5 140.34 11.18 403.35 6.99
TR B-B W16X31 6 5 140.34 11.18 403.35 6.99
Table 4-16. Schedule of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 1

FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
1-1 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
1-A W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2-2 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2F
2-A W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2-B W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
3-3 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
95
Column Design of Trade-off 1
In designing the column of the structure, the designers used STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition v22 to analyze
and design the section and reinforcement of the column.
Figure 4-26. Column Size Detailing for Trade-off 1
Table 4-17. Schedule of Columns for Trade-off 1

FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
LEVEL GRID SECTION QTY tw,
mm
A-A W14X61 7 3.375 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
B-B W16X50 1 3.75 179.58 16 413 9.65
B-B W16X50 1 8.05 179.58 16 413 9.65
1 B-B W12X35 2 3.75 166.62 13.21 317.5 7.62
C-C W14X61 3 3.75 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
C-C W14X61 4 5.05 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
D-D W14X61 7 3.75 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
A-A W14X61 7 3.375 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
B-B W16X50 1 4.3 179.58 16 413 9.65
2
C-C W14X61 3 3 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
C-C W14X61 4 1.7 253.87 16.38 352.81 9.53
96
Bracing Design of Trade-off 1
In designing the adequate bracing of the structure, the designers used STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition v22
to analyze and design the section and reinforcement of the bracing.
Figure 4-27. Bracing Size Detailing for Trade-off 1
Table 4-18. Schedule of Bracings for Trade-off 1

LENGTH,
LEVEL SECTION QTY D, mm B, mm T, mm
m
ROOF L8X8X1/2 12 7.18958 203.2 203.2 12.7
Steel Connection Design of Trade-off 1

In designing the steel connections of the structure, the designers used RAM Connection to analyze and
design the connections.
Table 4-19. Summary of Steel Connection Design
Connection Connection Name Ratio Status
1 BCF Moment End Plate 0.88 OK
2 BCW Flange Plate 0.28 OK
3 BCW Single Plate 0.24 OK
4 BCF - Moment End Plate 0.99 OK
5 BCF - Moment End Plate) 0.92 OK
6 BCW - Flange Plate 0.65 OK
7 BCF Flange Plate 0.05 OK
8 BCF - Flange Plate 0.71 OK
97
Figure 4-28. Front View of the Steel Connection Summary
Figure 4-29. Side View of the Steel Connection Summary
98
Figure 4-30. Side View Grid B-B of the Steel Connection Summary
Connection NO: 1
Connection Name: BCF - Moment End Plate
Figure 4-31. Lateral View and Front View of Connection no. 1 of Trade-off 1
Members
Beam
General
Beam type : Prismatic member
Beam section : W14X30
Beam material : STEEL_50_KSI
Horizontal angle (deg) : 0
Vertical angle (deg) : 14.574
99
Column
General
Support section : W14X61
Support material : STEEL_50_KSI
Column end : Yes
Moment end plate

Connector
Plate extension : Flush
B: Width : 228.6 mm
L: Length : 412.974 mm
tp: Plate thickness : 12.7 mm
Plate material : A36
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
Hole type on plate : Standard (STD)
Flush extension length : 25.4 mm
Beam side
Top flange weld type : Fillet
Top beam flange weld : E70XX
D1: Weld size to top beam flange (1/16in) : 4
Bottom flange weld type : Fillet
Bottom beam flange weld : E70XX
D3: Weld size to bottom beam flange (1/16in) : 4
Welding electrode to beam web : E70XX
D2: Weld size to beam web (1/16in) : 4
Support side
Bolts : 1/2" A325 N
Hole type on support : Standard (STD)
g: Gage - transverse center-to-center spacing : 139.7 mm
Lev: Vertical edge distance : 31.75 mm
Leh: Horizontal edge distance : 44.45 mm
Bolt group (top flange)
Bolts rows number : 2
pfi t: Distance from bolt rows to flange : 31.75 mm
s t: Vertical spacing between inner bolt rows : 50.8 mm
Bolt group (bottom flange)
pfi b: Distance from bolt rows to flange : 31.75 mm
s b: Vertical spacing between inner bolt rows : 50.8 mm
100
Connection NO: 2
Connection Name: BCW - Flange Plate
Figure 4-32. Lateral View of Connection no. 2 of Trade-off 1
Figure 4-33. Top View and Bottom View of Connection no. 2 of Trade-off 1
Members
Beam
General
101
Vertical angle (deg) : -14.574
sb: Beam setback : 0 mm
Column
General
Is column end : Yes
Flange plate
Connector
L: Top plate length : 120.65 mm
b: Top plate width : 177.8 mm
tp: Top plate thickness : 12.7 mm
Lb: Bottom plate length : 120.65 mm
bb: Bottom plate width : 177.8 mm
tpb: Bottom plate thickness : 12.7 mm
Beam side
Connection type : Bolted
Bolts : 1" A325 N
nc: Bolt columns : 2
nr: Rows of Bolts : 1
Lev: Longitudinal distance to top plate edge : 69.85 mm
Leh: Transverse distance to top plate edge : 50.8 mm
ef: Longitudinal distance to beam edge (top plate) : 50.8 mm
Levb: Longitudinal distance to bottom plate edge : 69.85 mm
Lehb: Transverse distance to bottom plate edge : 50.8 mm
efb: Longitudinal distance to beam edge (bottom plate) : 50.8 mm
Hole type on beam : Standard (STD)
Hole type on top plate : Standard (STD)
Hole type on bottom plate : Standard (STD)
Support side
Top welding electrode to support : E70XX
D1: Top weld size to support (1/16 in) : 4
Top welding electrode to column web : E70XX
D2: Top weld size to column web (1/16in) : 4
Bottom welding electrode to support : E70XX
D3: Bottom weld size to support (1/16 in) : 4
Bottom welding electrode to column web : E70XX
D4: Bottom weld size to column web (1/16in) : 4
102
Connection NO: 3
Connection Name: BCW Single Plate
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Plate type : Standard
Material : A36
Plate position on beam : Center
Bolts : 1" A325 N
s: Pitch - longitudinal center-to-center spacing : 76.2 mm
103
a: Distance between weld and bolts : 50 mm
Welding electrode to support : E70XX
D: Weld size to support (1/16 in) : 6
Wo: Obtuse side weld size (AWS) (1/16 in) : 6
Wa: Acute side weld size (AWS) (1/16 in) : 6
Wo: Obtuse side weld size (AISC) (1/16 in) : 6
Wa: Acute side weld size (AISC) (1/16 in) : 6
Connection NO: 4
Connection Name: BCF Moment End Plate
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Column end : No
Moment end plate

Connector
104
B: Width : 228.6 mm
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
Beam side
Support side
Bolts : 7/8" A325 N
105
Connection NO: 5
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Column end : Yes
Moment end plate

Connector
B: Width : 228.6 mm
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
106
Beam side
Support side
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
107
Connection NO: 6
Connection Name: BCW Flange Plate
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
108
Is column end : No
Flange plate
Connector
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
109
Connection NO: 7
Connection Name: BCF - Flange Plate
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : Yes
110
Flange plate
Connector
Top plate section : PL 12.7x177.8x120.65
Bottom plate section : PL 12.7x177.8x120.65
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
Top plate weld type : Fillet
Bottom plate weld type : Fillet
111
Connection NO: 8
Members
Beam
General
Vertical angle (deg) : 0
Horizontal eccentricity : 0 mm
Column
General
Is column end : No
112
Flange plate
Connector
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
Base Plate and Pedestal Design of Trade-off 1
In designing the base plate and pedestal of the structure, the designers used RAM Connection to analyze
and design.
Table 4-20. Summary of Base Plate Connection Design
1 Pinned BP 0.44 OK
2 Pinned BP HSS Member 0.29 OK
113
Connection NO: 1
Connection Name: Pinned BP
Figure 4-43. Top View and Anchor Detailing of Connection no. 1 of Trade-off 1
114
Members
Column
Column type : Prismatic member
Section : W 14X61
Material : A992 Gr50
Longitudinal offset : 0 mm
Connector
Base plate
Plate shape : Rectangular
Connection type : Unstiffened
Position on the support : Center
N: Longitudinal dimension : 500 mm
B: Transversal dimension : 500 mm
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Outer welds flanges only : No
D: Column weld size (1/16 in) : 8
Override A2/A1 ratio : No
Include shear lug : No
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Longitudinal dimension (pedestal) : 600 mm
Transversal dimension (pedestal) : 600 mm
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Include grouting : Yes
Grout thickness : 50 mm
Anchor
Anchor position : Longitudinal position
Rows number per side : 1
Anchors per row : 3
Longitudinal edge distance on the plate : 60 mm
Transverse edge distance on the plate : 60 mm
Anchor type : Headed
Head type : Hexagonal
Include lock nut : No
Anchor : 3/4"
Effective embedment depth : 500 mm
Total length : 595.146 mm
115
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Cracked concrete : No
Brittle steel : No
Anchors welded to base plate : No
Anchor reinforcement
Type of reinforcement : Primary
Tension reinforcement : Yes
Tension bar size : no. 6
Tension bar grade : 820 kN/mm2
Tension number of bars : 8
Shear reinforcement : Yes
Shear bar size : no. 6
Shear bar grade : 350 kN/mm2
Shear number of bars in major axis direction : 8
Shear number of bars in minor axis direction : 8
Connection NO: 2
Connection Name: Pinned BP - HSS Member
116
Members
Column
Section : W 16X50
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
117
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
118
Connection NO: 3
119
Members
Column
Section : W 12X35
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
120
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
Footing Design of Trade-off 1

In designing the footings of the structure, the designers used STAAD Foundation Advanced to analyze and
design.
Table 4-21. Summary of Footing Design
Footing Column Nos. Footing Dimension Footing Status
(m) Reinforcement
1 47, 48, 62, 63, 76, 117 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
2 1, 3, 4, 16, 18, 19, 31, 32, 33, 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
34, 46, 49, 61, 64, 78, 79,
104, 106, 108
3 3, 18 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
121
Footing No: 1
Column Nos.: 47, 48, 62, 63, 117
Figure 4-49. Plan and Elevation View of Footing no. 1 of Trade-off 1
Footing Geometry
Design Type: Calculate Dimension with user specified minimums as starting value
Minimum Footing Length - X(Fl): 1000.00 mm
Minimum Footing Width - Z (Fw): 1000.00 mm
Footing Thickness (Ft): 300.00 mm
Eccentricity along X (Oxd): 0.00 mm
Eccentricity along Z (Ozd): 0.00 mm
Column Dimensions
Column Shape: Rectangular
Column Length - X (Dcol): 0.60 m
Column Width - Z (Bcol): 0.60 m
122
Design Parameters
Concrete and Rebar Properties
Unit Weight of Concrete: 24.00 kN/m3
Strength of Concrete: 3000.00 psi
Yield Strength of Steel: 36.00 ksi
Minimum Bar Size: #5
Maximum Bar Size: #8
Top Footing Minimum Bar Size: #5
Top Footing Maximum Bar Size: #8
Pedestal Minimum Bar Size: #3
Pedestal Maximum Bar Size: #10
Minimum Bar Spacing: 75.00 mm
Maximum Bar Spacing: 300.00 mm
Pedestal Clear Cover (P, CL): 40.00 mm
Bottom Footing Clear Cover (F, CL): 40.00 mm
Soil Properties
Soil Type: Cohesive Soil
Unit Weight: 15.00 kN/m3
Soil Bearing Capacity: 200.00 kPa
Multiplying factor for soil bearing capacity for ultimate loads: 2.00
Soil Bearing Capacity Type: Gross Bearing Capacity
Soil Surcharge: 20.00 kPa
Height of Soil above Footing: 1000.00 mm
Type of Depth: Fixed Top
Cohesion: 0.00kip/in2
Bearing Capacity Input Method: Fixed Bearing Capacity
Minimum Percentage of Slab area in Contact for Service Loads: 0.00
Minimum Percentage of Slab area in Contact for Ultimate Loads: 0.00
Sliding and Overturning
Coefficient of Friction: 0.50
Factor of Safety Against Sliding: 1.50
Factor of Safety Against Overturning: 1.50
Reduction of force due to buoyancy = 16.92 kN
Effect due to adhesion = 0.00 kN
Area from initial length and width, Ao = Lo X Wo = 1.00 m2
Min. area required from bearing pressure, Amin = 0.53 m2
Final Footing Size
Length (L2) = 1.56 m Governing Load Case: # 214
Width (W2) = 1.56 m Governing Load Case: # 214
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
123
Depth is governed by Ultimate Load Case
(Service check is performed with footing thickness requirements from concrete check)
Area (A2) = 2.43 m2
Final Soil Height = 1.00 m
Foundation Self Weight = 17.49 kN
Soil Weight on Top of Footing = 31.05 kN
Footing No: 2
Column Nos.: 1, 4, 16, 19, 31, 32, 33, 34, 46, 49, 61, 64, 76, 78, 79, 104, 106, 108
Footing Geometry
124
Column Dimensions
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
Height of Soil above Footing: 1000.00mm
Cohesion: 0.00 kip/in2
125
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 3.76 m2
Footing No: 3
Column Nos.: 3, 18
126
Footing Geometry
Column Dimensions
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
127
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 4.06 m2
Structural Plans for Trade-off 1: SMRF
128
Beams Framing Plan
Figure 4-52. 2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan
129
Figure 4-53. 2nd Floor Roof Beam Framing Plan
130
Figure 4-54. Top Roof Beam Framing Plan
131
Columns Framing Plan
Figure 4-55. Columns Framing Plan
132
Connection Details
Figure 4-56. Schedule of Steel Connections
133
BASE PLATE CONNECTION SCHEDULE
Figure 4-57. Base Plate Connection Details
134
Footing Framing Plan and Sections
Figure 4-58. Footing Plan
135
Figure 4-59. Schedule of Footings
4.5 Design of Trade-off 2: SMRF with Chevron Bracing Frame System

Figure 4-60 shows the geometric model of the structure rendered from STAAD Pro Connect. Structural
136
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
2F
MAX 25.033 60.753 0 0.003 0 0
MIN -25.033 0 0 -0.003 0 0

VALUES
MAX 59.653 0.912 0.311 0.003 0.778 0.535
GRID A
MIN -59.653 -0.14 -0.311 -0.003 -0.778 -0.535
MAX 34.896 40.887 9.826 0.008 10.174 52.131
GRID B
MIN -34.896 -40.159 -9.826 -0.008 -10.175 -55.355
MAX 41.176 34.981 2.863 0.008 7.154 77.363
GRID C
MIN -41.176 -34.253 -2.863 -0.008 -7.154 -77.363
MAX 64.427 0.912 0.204 0.003 0.511 0.463
GRID D
MIN -64.427 -0.129 -0.204 -0.003 -0.511 -0.463
137
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
GRID VALUES
MAX 46.136 29.51 0.28 0.01 1.431 71.345
1-1
MIN -47.322 -59.496 -0.28 -0.01 -1.428 -104.488
MAX 57.621 53.017 0.018 0.011 0.073 78.738
2-2
2nd MIN -60.955 -59.96 -0.018 -0.011 -0.074 -110.588
To MAX 57.762 53.365 0.018 0.011 0.075 78.375
3-3
TR MIN -61.094 -59.921 -0.018 -0.011 -0.072 -110.629
F MAX 50.965 51.622 0.015 0.012 0.057 78.576
4-4
L MIN -50.965 -59.931 -0.015 -0.012 -0.056 -110.535
O MAX 59.775 53.047 0.015 0.012 0.057 78.366
O 5-5
MIN -59.775 -59.898 -0.015 -0.012 -0.056 -110.463
R MAX 55.433 53.271 0.015 0.012 0.057 78.653
S 6-6
MIN -58.796 -59.956 -0.015 -0.012 -0.055 -110.492
MAX 46.365 29.54 0.234 0.007 1.201 71.234
7-7
MIN -48.801 -59.334 -0.234 -0.007 -1.201 -103.452

VALUES
MAX 181.527 40.01 18.424 0.078 13.218 105.074
STORY 1
MIN -178.716 -29.285 -13.079 -0.078 -12.251 -85.218
MAX 100.781 58.906 14.448 0.067 12.252 106.317
STORY 2
MIN -100.781 -46.651 -14.448 -0.067 -13.217 -90.942

FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
BRACINGS MAX 82.46 1.923 0 0 0 0
MIN -82.46 0 0 0 0 0
CHEVRON MAX 68.051 0.266 0 0 0 0
BRACINGS MIN -67.367 0 0 0 0 0
138
Node L/C Mx kN- My Mz kN-
Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN
m kN-m .m
Max 116
Fx 76 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) 35.487 37.183 -1.031 -1.018 0.316 -28.893
Min 115
Fx 78 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) -42.647 -1.49 -1.319 -1.333 -0.02 39.373
Max
Fy 48 102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL -7.472 213.649 1.303 1.331 0.02 5.147
Min
Fy 46 4 EQ(-Z) -4.639 -113.823 25.734 29.615 -0.101 6.661
Max
Fz 46 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -1.345 -61.94 27.068 30.989 -0.194 1.858
Min
Fz 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.643 -45.685 -27.109 -30.975 1.465 -2.956
Max
Mx 125 11 WL(-Z) -0.359 -18.624 24.771 36.363 0.129 0.394
Min
Mx 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.643 -45.685 -27.109 -30.975 1.465 -2.956
Max
My 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.643 -45.685 -27.109 -30.975 1.465 -2.956
Min
My 76 4 EQ(-Z) -0.708 108.685 25.802 29.624 -1.387 0.913
Max 115
Mz 34 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) -39.934 61.814 0.578 0.666 -0.016 59.877
Min
Mz 19 9 WL(-X) 29.22 -54.756 0.002 0.002 -0.008 -43.817

Node L/C
Max
X 58 8 WL(+X) 54.977 0.274 -0.016 54.978 0 0 0
Min
X 106 104 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL -39.609 -0.098 -0.092 39.609 0 0 0.002
Max
Y 59 8 WL(+X) 50.341 18.34 -0.048 53.578 0 0 0.001
Min
Y 44 102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL -4.303 -21.943 -0.121 22.361 0 0 0
Max
Z 98 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 0.579 -3.139 16.205 16.516 0 0.003 0
Min
Z 101 4 EQ(-Z) -3.414 0.058 -15.853 16.217 0.001 -0.002 0.001
139
Max
rX 89 3 EQ(+Z) 2.725 10.976 15.065 18.838 0.005 -0.001 0.001
Min
rX 59 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL 1.502 4.411 -15.348 16.039 -0.005 0.001 0
Max
rY 75 2 EQ(-X) -20.162 0.006 -0.281 20.164 0 0.008 0.004
Min
rY 75 103 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL 19.952 -0.18 0.702 19.965 0 -0.009 -0.004
Max
rZ 60 2 EQ(-X) -28.274 -0.001 -0.279 28.275 0 0.001 0.008
Min 115
rZ 45 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) 33.497 -0.075 0.448 33.5 0.001 0 -0.009
Max
Rst 58 8 WL(+X) 54.977 0.274 -0.016 54.978 0 0 0

Average
DRIFT (mm)
Story Height Displacement (mm) STATUS
X Z X Z
BASE 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
2F 3.75 16.115 3.105 6.892 2.696 PASS
2TR 5.05 17.873 4.791 1.762 1.793 PASS
RB 6.75 21.408 2.867 4.36 1.924 PASS
TR 8.05 21.333 5.151 0.468 2.285 PASS
dimensions.

Top Roof Beams at Z
Steel (A992) W8 x 18
Direction
Top Roof Beams at X
Steel (A992) W14 x 30
Direction
2 Floor Roof Beams at
nd Steel (A992)
W12 x 30
X Direction
140
Roof Bracing Steel (A992) L8x8x1/2
Chevron Bracings Steel (A992) L5x5x5/16
Load Diagrams
the structure.
Primary Loads
141
142
143
Figure 4-66: Earthquake Load at - X Direction
144
Load Combinations
145
Figure 4-71. Governing Shear Force in Z-Axis, Fz (1.2DL + 1.0EQ(+Z) + 0.5FLL)
146
Figure 4-73. Governing Bending Moment at Y-Axis, My (0.9DL + 1.0WL(-Z))
147
148
Table 4-31. Schedule of Beams along X-Direction for Trade-off 2
FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
1-1 W12X30 1 5.16624 140.34 11.18 313.44 6.6
2-2 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
3-3 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
2TR 4-4 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
5-5 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
6-6 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
7-7 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6.6
1-1 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
2-2 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
3-3 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
ROOF 4-4 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
5-5 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
6-6 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
7-7 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6.86
Table 4-32. Schedule of Beams along Z-Direction for Trade-off 2

LENGTH, FLANGE WEB
A-A W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
B-B W12X26 2 2.5 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
B-B W12X26 2 1.6 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
B-B W12X26 1 1.8 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
2F
C-C W12X26 2 2.5 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W12X26 2 1.6 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W12X26 1 1.8 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
D-D W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
2TR C-C W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
A-A W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
RB
C-C W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
TR B-B W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
149
Table 4-33. Schedule of Intermediate Beams for Trade-off 2
FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
1-1 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
1-A W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2-2 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2F
2-A W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2-B W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
3-3 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
Column Design of Trade-off 2
In designing the column of the structure, the designers used STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition v22 to analyze
and design the section and reinforcement of the column.
Figure 4-76. Column Size Detailing for Trade-off 2
150
Table 4-34. Schedule of Columns for Trade-off 2
FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
A-A W14X43 7 3.375 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
B-B W14X43 1 3.75 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
B-B W14X43 1 8.05 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
1 B-B W12X26 2 3.75 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W14X43 3 3.75 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
C-C W14X43 4 5.05 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
D-D W12X40 7 3.75 203.33 13.08 303.28 7.49
A-A W14X43 7 3.375 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
B-B W14X43 1 4.3 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
2
C-C W14X43 3 3 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
C-C W14X43 4 1.7 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
Bracing Design of Trade-off 2
In designing the adequate bracing of the structure, the designers used STAAD.Pro CONNECT Edition v22
to analyze and design the section and reinforcement of the bracing.
Figure 4-77. Bracing Size Detailing for Trade-off 2
151
LENGTH,
LEVEL SECTION QTY d, mm b, mm t, mm
m
Roof Bracing L8X8X1/2 12 7.18958 152.4 152.4 7.874
L5x5x5/16 8 4.20007 127 127 7.874
Chevron Bracing L5x5x5/16 4 4.50694 127 127 7.874
L5x5x5/16 4 3.02324 127 127 7.874
5 BCF - Single Plate 0.33 OK
6 BCW - Single Plate 0.36 OK
9 CBB Gusset Plate 0.39 OK
10 CVR - Gusset Plate 0.42 OK
152
153
Figure 4-80. Side View of the Chevron Steel Connection Summary
Connection NO: 1
Members
Beam
General
154
Column
General
Column end : Yes
Moment end plate

Connector
B: Width : 228.6 mm
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
Beam side
Support side
Bolts : 1/2" A325 N
155
Connection NO: 2
156
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : Yes
Flange plate
Connector
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
157
Connection NO: 3
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
158
Connection NO: 4
Members
Beam
General
Include beam stiffener : No
Column
General
Column end : No
159
Moment end plate
Connector
Plate extension : Extended internal edge
B: Width : 228.6 mm
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
Beam side
Support side
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Bolt group (bottom extension)
pfo b: Distance from bolt rows to flange : 38.1 mm
160
Connection NO: 5
Connection Name: BCF Single Plate

Members
Beam
General
Horizontal eccentricity : 0 mm
Column
General
161
Is column end : Yes
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Connection NO: 6
Connection Name: BCW - Single Plate
162
Figure 4-88. Top View of Connection no. 6 of Trade-off 2
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
163
Connection NO: 7
Connection Name: BCF - Single Plate

Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : Yes
164
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
165
Connection NO: 8
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Flange plate
Connector
166
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
167
Connection NO: 9
Connection Name: CBB - N(92) Gusset Plate

Members
Existing members
Right beam : Yes
Left beam : Yes
Upper left brace : Yes
Column
General
Column section : W14X43
Column material : STEEL_50_KSI
Column orientation : Transversal
Is column end : No
168
Right beam
General
Section : W8X18
Material : STEEL_50_KSI
Coped
dct: Top cope depth : 16.002 mm
ct: Top-flange cope length : 97.726 mm
dcb: Bottom cope depth : 16.002 mm
cb: Bottom-flange cope length : 97.726 mm
Left beam
General
Section : W8X18
Coped
Upper left brace

General
Section : L50505
Brace slope angle (degrees) : 53.471
Salient brace leg to the right : No
Brace long leg on gusset : No
Additional geometric data
wpx: WP horizontal displacement : 0 mm
wpy: WP vertical displacement : 0 mm
Le: Minimum distance to other members : 50.8 mm
L1: Left distance : 50.8 mm
L2: Right distance : 86.882 mm
Interfaces
Right beam
Beam-to-Column connection
Connection type to column : Single plate
sb: Setback to column : 0 mm
Single plate
Description : PL 50x127x161.6
tp: Plate thickness : 50 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Hole type : Standard (STD)
169
s: Pitch - longitudinal center-to-center spacing : 60 mm
a: Distance between weld and bolts : 76.2 mm
Weld to column : E70XX
D: Weld size (1/16 in) : 20
Eccentricity : 0 mm
Left beam
Single plate
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
Upper left brace
Gusset
General
tp: Thickness : 19.05 mm
Material : A36
LV: Length on column : 421.89 mm
LH: Length on beam : 322.09 mm
Gusset-to-Brace connection
General
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Hole type on gusset : Standard (STD)
170
Leh: Longitudinal distance to edge : 38.1 mm
Lev: Transverse distance to edge : 38.1 mm
Gusset-to-Column connection
General
sc: Setback : 38.1 mm
Single plate
Description : PL 6x127x254
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
Gusset-to-Beam connection
General
Connection type to beam : Directly welded
Directly welded
Welding electrode to beam : E70XX
D: Weld size to beam (1/16 in) : 3
171
Connection NO: 10
Connection Name: CVR - Gusset Plate

Members
Existing members
Upper gusset : No
Lower gusset : Yes
Lower gusset members : Both
Beam
General
Section : W8X18
Lower left brace

General
Section : L50505
172
Lower right brace
General
Section : L50505
Interfaces
Lower gusset
General
Material : A36
LV: Length over vertical limit : 296.915 mm
Bottom gusset-to-beam connection
Directly welded
Lower left brace

Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Lower right brace

Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
173
and design.
1 Pinned BP 0.49 OK
4 Gusset BP 0.74 OK
5 Gusset BP 0.43 OK
Footing Geometry
Column Dimensions
174
Connection NO: 1
175
Footing Geometry
Members
Column
Section : W 14X43
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
176
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
177
Connection NO: 2
178
Members
Column
Section : W 12X40
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
179
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
Connection NO: 3
180
Members
Column
Section : W 12X26
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
181
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
182
Connection NO: 4
Connection Name: Gusset BP
Figure 4-101. Lateral View of Main Connection of Connection no. 4 of Trade-off 2
Figure 4-102. Lateral View of Directly Bolted Connection of Connection no. 4 of Trade-off 2
183
Figure 4-103. Lateral View of Directly Welded Connection of Connection no. 4 of Trade-off 2
184
Figure 4-105. Lateral View of Base Plate of Connection no. 4 of Trade-off 2
Members
Actual members
Right brace : Yes
Left brace : No
Column
General
Section : W 14X43
Transversal offset : 0 mm
Include opposite stiffener : No
Right brace
General
Section : L 5X5X5_16
Brace slope angle (degrees) : 33
Salient brace leg to the right : Yes
Brace long leg on gusset : Yes
185
L1: Left distance : 50 mm
L2: Right distance : 50 mm
Base Plate
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
186
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
Interfaces
Right brace - Gusset
General
tp: Thickness : 10 mm
Material : A36
LH: Length over plate : 279.628 mm
Right brace - Gusset/Brace connection
General
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Leh: Longitudinal distance to edge : 40 mm
Lev: Transverse distance to edge : 60 mm
187
Right brace - Gusset/Column connection
General
Connection type to column : Directly welded
Directly welded
Column weld : E70XX
D: Weld size to column (1/16 in) : 6
Right brace - Gusset/Base plate connection
Directly welded
Base plate weld : E70XX
D: Plate weld size (1/16 in) : 6
Connection NO: 5
188
189
Members
Actual members
Right brace : Yes
Left brace : No
Column
General
Section : W 12X40
Right brace
General
190
Base Plate
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
191
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
Interfaces
General
Material : A36
General
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
General
Directly welded
Column weld : E70XX
192
Directly welded
design.
Table 4-38. Summary of Footing Design
(m) Reinforcement
1 32, 47, 48, 61, 62, 63, 64, 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
112, 116, 125
2 16, 19, 33, 78, 114 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
3 4, 34, 49, 79 2.5 x 2.5 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
4 1, 31, 46, 76 2.8 x 2.8 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
5 3, 18 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
193
Footing No: 1
Column Nos.: 32, 47, 48, 61, 62, 63, 64, 112, 116, 125
Footing Geometry
Column Dimensions
194
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
195
Area (A2) = 3.96 m2
Footing No: 2
Column Nos.: 16, 19, 33, 78, 114
Footing Geometry
196
Column Dimensions
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
197
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 3.66 m2
198
Footing No: 3
Column Nos.: 4, 34, 49, 79
Footing Geometry
Column Dimensions
199
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
200
Area (A2) = 5.04 m2
Footing No: 4
Column Nos.: 1, 31, 46, 76
Footing Geometry
201
Column Dimensions
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
202
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 7.44 m2
Footing No: 5
Column Nos.: 3, 18
203
Footing Geometry
Column Dimensions
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
204
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 4.38 m2
Structural Plans for Trade-off 2: SMRF with Chevron Bracing System

Beams Framing Plan
205
Figure 4-116.2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan
206
207
208
209
Connection Details
Figure 4-120. Schedule of Steel Connections
210
211
212
4.6 Design of Trade-off 3: SMRF with Cross Bracing Frame System

Figure 4-124 shows the geometric model of the structure rendered from STAAD Pro Connect. Structural
213
FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
2F
MAX 25.435 60.753 0 0.003 0 0
MIN -25.435 0 0 -0.003 0 0

VALUES
MAX 69.669 0.912 0 0.003 0 0
GRID A
MIN -69.669 0 0 -0.003 0 0
MAX 34.843 41.191 9.995 0.007 10.384 53.585
GRID B
MIN -34.843 -40.463 -9.995 -0.007 -10.386 -56.178
214
MAX 50.825 34.981 2.892 0.008 7.209 77.363
GRID C
MIN -50.825 -34.253 -2.892 -0.008 -7.209 -77.363
MAX 63.651 0.912 0 0.003 0 0
GRID D
MIN -63.651 0 0 -0.003 0 0

FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
GRID VALUES
MAX 46.135 29.509 0.279 0.01 1.425 71.344
1-1
MIN -47.321 -59.496 -0.279 -0.01 -1.429 -104.489
MAX 62.044 52.102 0.02 0.011 0.078 78.641
2-2
2nd MIN -62.044 -59.936 -0.02 -0.011 -0.08 -110.593
To MAX 56.745 52.416 0.02 0.011 0.081 78.477
3-3
TR MIN -60.001 -59.938 -0.02 -0.011 -0.077 -110.622
F MAX 50.965 51.623 0.017 0.013 0.063 78.577
4-4
L MIN -50.965 -59.931 -0.017 -0.013 -0.062 -110.535
O MAX 62.839 52.109 0.016 0.013 0.062 78.47
O 5-5
MIN -62.839 -59.924 -0.016 -0.013 -0.062 -110.469
R MAX 55.901 52.345 0.016 0.012 0.063 78.554
S 6-6
MIN -57.42 -59.936 -0.016 -0.012 -0.06 -110.485
MAX 46.365 29.54 0.24 0.007 1.231 71.234
7-7
MIN -48.801 -59.334 -0.24 -0.007 -1.232 -103.452

VALUES
MAX 179.314 39.946 18.38 0.077 12.997 105.074
STORY 1
MIN -176.504 -29.277 -13.119 -0.077 -12.673 -85.78
MAX 100.703 58.773 14.51 0.066 12.674 106.266
STORY 2
MIN -100.703 -45.557 -14.51 -0.066 -12.995 -88.566

FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
VALUES
BRACINGS MAX 81.072 0.753 0 0 0 0
MIN -81.072 0 0 0 0 0
CROSS MAX 96.353 0.637 0 0 0 0
BRACINGS MIN -97.09 0 0 0 0 0
215
Node L/C Mx kN- My Mz kN-
Fx kN Fy kN Fz kN
m kN-m .m
Max 116
Fx 76 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) 35.417 36.128 -1.678 -1.785 0.308 -28.792
Min 115
Fx 78 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) -42.616 -3.517 -1.315 -1.331 -0.017 39.332
Max
Fy 48 102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL -7.344 211.428 1.306 1.332 0.018 4.982
Min
Fy 46 4 EQ(-Z) -4.441 -112.599 32.547 37.782 -0.101 6.377
Max
Fz 46 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -1.44 -61.665 34.048 39.355 -0.187 2.007
Min
Fz 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.603 -45.588 -34.133 -39.365 1.45 -2.891
Max
Mx 46 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -1.44 -61.665 34.048 39.355 -0.187 2.007
Min
Mx 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.603 -45.588 -34.133 -39.365 1.45 -2.891
Max
My 76 105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 16.603 -45.588 -34.133 -39.365 1.45 -2.891
Min
My 76 4 EQ(-Z) -0.714 103.35 18.746 21.269 -1.426 0.921
Max 115
Mz 34 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) -39.862 61.322 0.546 0.622 -0.015 59.771
Min
Mz 19 9 WL(-X) 29.22 -54.772 0.004 0.004 -0.008 -43.817

Node L/C
Max
X 58 8 WL(+X) 54.965 0.267 -0.028 54.965 0 0 0
Min
X 43 104 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL -36.176 -0.149 -0.22 36.177 0 0 0.002
Max
Y 44 8 WL(+X) 50.318 18.33 -0.023 53.553 0 0 0.001
Min
Y 44 102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL -4.17 -21.252 -0.166 21.658 0 0 0
Max
Z 115 3 EQ(+Z) 0 0 16.918 16.918 0.002 -0.001 0
Min
Z 74 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -0.49 -0.192 -17.436 17.444 0.001 0.001 0
216
Max
rX 59 3 EQ(+Z) -2.556 -10.978 16.601 20.066 0.005 -0.001 0
Min
rX 89 106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL -3.611 -17.005 -16.775 24.158 -0.005 0.001 0
Max
rY 75 2 EQ(-X) -20.427 0.006 -0.296 20.429 0 0.008 0.004
Min
rY 75 103 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL 20.215 -0.18 0.678 20.227 0 -0.009 -0.004
Max
rZ 60 2 EQ(-X) -27.695 -0.001 -0.294 27.697 0 0.001 0.007
Min 115
rZ 45 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) 33.335 -0.075 0.43 33.338 0.001 0 -0.009
Max
Rst 58 8 WL(+X) 54.965 0.267 -0.028 54.965 0 0 0

Average
DRIFT (mm)
Story Height Displacement (mm) STATUS
X Z X Z
BASE 0 0 0 0 0 PASS
2F 3.75 15.876 3.602 6.207 3.043 PASS
2TR 5.05 17.818 5.294 1.947 1.769 PASS
RB 6.75 21.373 3.402 4.059 1.892 PASS
TR 8.05 21.375 5.804 0.014 2.401 PASS
dimensions.

Top Roof Beams at Z
Steel (A992) W8 x 18
Direction
Top Roof Beams at X
Steel (A992) W14 x 30
Direction
2 Floor Roof Beams at
nd Steel (A992)
W12 x 30
X Direction
217
Roof Bracing Steel (A992) L5x5x5/16
Chevron Bracings Steel (A992) L6x6x5/16
Load Diagrams
the structure.
Primary Loads
218
219
220
Figure 4-130: Earthquake Load at - X Direction
221
Load Combinations
222
Figure 4-135. Governing Shear Force in Z-Axis, Fz (1.2DL + 1.0EQ(+Z) + 0.5FLL)
223
Figure 4-137. Governing Bending Moment at Y-Axis, My (1.2DL + 1.0EQ(+Z) + 0.5FLL)
224
225
LENGTH,
m
Roof Bracing L5x5x5/16 12 7.18958 127 127 7.874
L6X6X5/16 8 6.03246 152.4 152.4 7.874
Cross Bracing L6X6X5/16 4 6.25 152.4 152.4 7.874
L6X6X5/16 4 5.2811 152.4 152.4 7.874
6 BCW - Single Plate 0.36 OK
9 CBB Gusset Plate 0.43 OK
10 CBB - Gusset Plate 0.79 OK
226
Figure 4-140. Front View of the Steel Connection Summary
227
Figure 4-143. Side View of the Cross Steel Connection Summary
Connection NO: 1
Members
Beam
General
228
Column
General
Column end : Yes
Moment end plate

Connector
B: Width : 228.6 mm
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
Beam side
Support side
Bolts : 1/2" A325 N
229
Connection NO: 2
Members
Beam
General
230
Column
General
Is column end : Yes
Flange plate
Connector
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
231
Connection NO: 3
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
232
Connection NO: 4
Members
Beam
General
Include beam stiffener : No
Column
General
Column end : No
233
Moment end plate
Connector
Plate extension : Extended internal edge
B: Width : 228.6 mm
Fy : 0.248 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.4 kN/mm2
Beam side
Support side
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Bolt group (bottom extension)
pfo b: Distance from bolt rows to flange : 38.1 mm
234
Connection NO: 5

Members
Beam
General
Column
General
235
Is column end : Yes
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Connection NO: 6
Connection Name: BCW - Single Plate
236
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
237
Connection NO: 7
Members
Beam
General
238
Column
General
Is column end : Yes
Single plate
Connector
Section : PL 12.7x100.8x165.1
b: Width : 100.8 mm
Material : A36
Bolts : 1" A325 N
239
Connection NO: 8
Members
Beam
General
Column
General
Is column end : No
Flange plate
Connector
240
Beam side
Bolts : 1" A325 N
Support side
241
Connection NO: 9
Connection Name: CBB Gusset Plate

Members
Existing members
Right beam : Yes
Left beam : Yes
Upper left brace : Yes
Lower left brace : Yes
Column
General
242
Column material : STEEL_50_KSI
Is column end : No
Right beam
General
Section : W8X18
Coped
Left beam
General
Section : W8X18
Coped
Upper left brace

General
Section : L60605
Lower left brace

General
Section : L60605
243
Interfaces
Right beam
Single plate
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
Left beam
Single plate
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
244
Upper left brace
Gusset
General
Material : A36
General
Connection type : Welded
Lt: Length on toe : 254 mm
Lh: Length on heel : 254 mm
Brace weld : E70XX
dp: Distance between weld and plate end : 25.4 mm
General
Single plate
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
General
Directly welded
245
Lower left brace
Gusset
General
Material : A36
General
Connection type : Welded
Lt: Length on toe : 254 mm
Lh: Length on heel : 254 mm
Brace weld : E70XX
dp: Distance between weld and plate end : 25.4 mm
General
Single plate
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
General
Directly welded
246
Connection NO: 10
Connection Name: CBB - Gusset Plate

Members
Existing members
Right beam : Yes
Left beam : Yes
Column
General
Column material : STEEL
Is column end : Yes
Right beam
General
Section : W16X31
Material : STEEL
Coped
247
Left beam
General
Section : W16X31
Material : STEEL
Coped
Lower right brace

General
Section : L60605
Material : STEEL
Interfaces
Right beam
Single plate
Description : PL 1/4x5x10
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
Left beam
Single plate
248
Description : PL 6x127x254
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
Eccentricity : 0 mm
Lower right brace
Gusset
General
Material : A36
General
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
General
Single plate
Material : A36
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
249
Eccentricity : 0 mm
General
Directly welded
and design.
1 Pinned BP 0.49 OK
4 Gusset BP 0.91 OK
5 Gusset BP 0.59 OK
250
Connection NO: 1
251
Members
Column
Section : W 14X43
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
252
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
253
Connection NO: 2
254
Members
Column
Section : W 12X40
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
255
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
Connection NO: 3
256
Members
Column
Section : W 12X26
Connector
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
257
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
258
Connection NO: 4
259
260
Members
Actual members
Right brace : Yes
Left brace : No
Column
General
Section : W 14X43
Right brace
General
261
Base Plate
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
262
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
Brittle steel : No
Interfaces
General
Material : A36
General
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
General
Directly welded
Column weld : E70XX
263
Directly welded
Connection NO: 5
264
265
Members
Actual members
Right brace : Yes
Left brace : No
Column
General
Section : W 12X40
Right brace
General
266
Base Plate
Base plate
Thickness : 20 mm
Material : A36
Column weld : E70XX
Support
With pedestal : Yes
Thickness : 1500 mm
Material : C 3-40
Anchor
Anchors per row : 3
Anchor : 3/4"
Material : A325
Fy : 0.558 kN/mm2
Fu : 0.725 kN/mm2
267
Brittle steel : No
Interfaces
General
Material : A36
General
Bolts : 3/4" A325 N
General
Directly welded
Column weld : E70XX
Directly welded
268
design.
(m) Reinforcement
1 32, 47, 48, 62, 63, 117 1.5 x 1.5 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
2 16, 19, 33, 61, 64, 78, 104, 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
106, 108
3 4, 34, 49, 79 2.5 x 2.5 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
4 1, 31, 46, 76 2.7 x 2.7 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
5 3, 18 2.0 x 2.0 x 0.3 #5 @ 279 mm Passed
269
Footing No: 1
Column Nos.: 32, 47, 48, 62, 63, 117
Footing Geometry
Design Parameters
270
Soil Properties
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 2.43 m2
271
Footing No: 2
Column Nos.: 16, 19, 33, 61, 64, 78, 104, 106, 108
Footing Geometry
272
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
273
Area (A2) = 3.96 m2
Footing No: 3
Column Nos.: 4, 34, 49, 79
Footing Geometry
274
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
Final Footing Size
275
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 5.62 m2
Footing No: 4
Column Nos.: 1, 31, 46, 76
Footing Geometry
276
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
277
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 8.00 m2
Footing No: 5
Column Nos.: 3, 18

Footing Geometry
278
Design Parameters
Soil Properties
279
Final Footing Size
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 4.17 m2
Structural Plans for Trade-off 3: SMRF with Cross Bracing System
Beams Framing Plan
280
Figure 4-179. 2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan
281
282
283
284
Connection Details
285
Figure 4-183. Steel Connection Details
286
287
288
4.7 Multiple Constraints using Final Normalization Method
After the evaluation of the initial estimate, a rough computation was applied. The scale or weight of
each criterion is determined by the designers' perspective and the client's specifications. The equation to be
used for the ability to fulfill the criteria in Normalized Data calculation is:
The weight percentage is determined based on the optimal percentages of each performance
parameter as agreed upon, depending on the resulted value. All criteria used in the trade-off calculation
should be up to 100 percent (100%).
The design trade-off with the highest total value for each context will be used in the design.
289
Summary of Final Estimates
Table 4-52. Summary of Final Estimates

Sustainability
Economic Uncertainty
Constructability (Maintenance Risk Assessment Safety
Design Material Cost (Dependence
(Days of work) Cost in 50 (Story Drift, mm) (>=100%)
(Php) Percentage)
years in Php)
Special
Moment
9,022,977.98 85 2,255,744.50 16.13 100% 100%
Resisting
Frame
Chevron
Bracing 8,208,742.36 89 2,052,118.09 5.15 168.06% 31.94%
system
Cross
Bracing 7,890,994.79 90 1,972,748.70 5.80 164.01% 35.99%
system
Table 4-52 demonstrates the data and the difference of each trade-off between the constraints. The
designer gathered the data from GS Hardware, RJ Reyes Hardware, and some online data from hardwares
which are near on the project location and inquired the pricing of each material. Based on it, we can see that
for the economic cost, the designers used the data that have gathered based on the design of the structure.
The crucial one is the steel works since it has different weight based on the material take-off and converts it.
Constructability, on the other hand is gathered based on the number of days needed to do the specific type
of work it can also be associated with the quantity of material and the labor need for each phase of the
construction. Sustainability cost is about the maintenance cost on which we compute it for maintaining its
lifespan. The risk assessment is computed and gathered by finding the story drift so that it can determine
what loads that it can handle and on what aspect does it continue to maintain itself when dealing with different
loads. The safety on the other hand is based upon the story drift and if its percentage of safety is based on
how safe it is. Uncertainty is also based on the the story drift and by using the percentage difference then we
can come up with the data showing the uncertainty of the structure, the lower the value, the less likely to
have a large value of uncertain percentages.
290
Normalized Data
Table 4-53. Normalized Data

Sustainability Risk
Economic Uncertainty
Constructability (Maintenance Assessment Safety
Design Cost (Cost in (Dependence
(Days of work) Cost in 50 years (Story Drift, (>=100%)
Php) Percentage)
in Php) mm)
Special
Moment
1.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Resisting
Frame
Chevron
Bracing Frame 7.47 2.80 7.48 10.00 10.00 10.00
System
Cross- Bracing
10.00 1.00 10.00 9.47 9.46 9.46
Frame System
Table 4-53 shows the normalized data which is based on the formula of normalization, and it briefly
shows the ranking of which the trade-off is favored, which is also based on each constraint thus it allows the
designers to compare it.
Weighted Sum of Various Percentage Weight
Table 4-54. First Weighted Sum of Various Percentage

Special Moment Chevron Bracing Cross Bracing
Constraints Weight
Resisting System System Frame System
Economic Cost 0.2 1.00 7.47 10.00

Constructability
0.15 10.00 2.80 1.00
(Days of Work)
Sustainability
in 50 years)
Risk Assessment 0.2 1.00 10.00 9.47
Safety 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.46
Uncertainty 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.46
Weighted Sum 1 2.35 8.04 8.38
Table 4-54 shows that the favored trade-off is the constraint trade-off since it is based on the
normalized data, the designers ranking is based upon the table on where the economic and risk is prioritized
since it has a scope between the other constraints.
291
Table 4-55. Second Weighted Sum of Various Percentage

Constraints Weight
Economic Cost 0.2 1.00 7.47 10.00

Constructability
0.2 10.00 2.80 1.00
(Days of Work)
Sustainability
in 50 years)
Risk Assessment 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.47
Safety 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.46
Uncertainty 0.15 1.00 10.00 9.46
Weighted Sum 1 2.8 7.68 7.96
Table 4-55 shows the result of the weighted sum of various, the economic and constructability is
prioritized and is based on perspective of the client where they want put importance to.
Table 4-56. Third Weighted Sum of Various Percentage

Constraints Weight
Economic Cost 0.17 1.00 7.47 10.00

Constructability
0.17 10.00 2.80 1.00
(Days of Work)
Sustainability
in 50 years)
Risk Assessment 0.17 1.00 10.00 9.47
Safety 0.16 1.00 10.00 9.46
Uncertainty 0.16 1.00 10.00 9.46
Weighted Sum 1 2.53 7.92 8.21
292
Table 4-56 shows the result of the third weighted sum of various percentage on which it is based on
equal preferences that the weight is almost the same it just differs on what is most important. Overall, the
Cross-Bracing System have the highest weighted sum among the other trade-offs.
Overall Trade-off Assessment
Based on the overall evaluation of the data, the designers can conclude that the best trade-off is that
Cross-bracing system since it has the best weighted sum among the other trade-offs even in the different
category of percentage weight.
4.8 Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is when we compare the different constraints to the economic constraint so that
we can determine if the structure is statically cost-efficient.
Economic vs Constructability
Table 4-57 illustrates the duration when the constructing the structure. When the material cost
increases, the duration lessens, and the work will be done hastily.
Table 4-57. Economic vs. Constructability

Special Moment Frame
Chevron bracing system Cross bracing system
System
Percent
Material
Increase Material Cost Duration Material Cost Duration Duration
Cost
(Php) (Days) (Php) (Days) (Days)
(Php)
0% 9,022,977.98 85 8,208,742.36 89 7,890,994.79 90
5% 9,474,126.88 80.75 8,619,179.48 84.55 8,285,544.53 85.5
10% 9,925,275.78 72.675 9,029,616.60 76.10 8,680,094.27 76.95
15% 10,376,424.68 61.77375 9,440,053.71 64.68 9,074,644.01 65.4075
20% 10,827,573.58 49.419 9,850,490.83 51.74 9,469,193.75 52.326
25% 11,278,722.48 37.06425 10,260,927.95 38.81 9,863,743.49 39.2445
293
ECONOMIC VS. CONSTRUCTABILITY
100
90
80
DURATION (Days) 70 SPECIAL MOMENT
RESISTING FRAME
60 SYSTEM
50
CHEVRON BRACING
40 SYSTEM
30
20 CROSS BRACING
10 SYSTEM
0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
COST PER PERCENTAGE (%)
Figure 4-187. Economic vs. Constructability
Economic vs Sustainability
Table 4-58 illustrates the comparison between the trade-offs and their respectable maintenance cost.
It shows that as the material cost increase its price, the maintenance cost is also increasing its price relatively.
Table 4-58. Economic vs. Sustainability

Chevron Bracing System Cross Bracing System
Percent System
Increas Sustainability Sustainability Material Sustainability
Material Cost Material Cost
e (Maintenanc (maintenanc Cost (maintenanc
(Php) (Php)
e cost) e cost) (Php) e cost)
0% 7,890,994.7
9,022,977.98 2,255,744.50 8,208,742.36 2,052,118.09 9 1,972,748.70
5% 8,285,544.5
9,474,126.88 2,368,531.73 8,619,179.48 2,154,723.99 3 2,071,386.14
10% 8,680,094.2
9,925,275.78 2,481,318.95 9,029,616.60 2,257,329.90 7 2,170,023.57
15% 10,376,424.6 9,074,644.0
8 2,594,106.18 9,440,053.71 2,359,935.80 1 2,268,661.01
20% 10,827,573.5 9,469,193.7
8 2,706,893.40 9,850,490.83 2,462,541.71 5 2,367,298.44
25% 11,278,722.4 10,260,927.9 9,863,743.4
8 2,819,680.63 5 2,565,147.61 9 2,465,935.88
294
3000000.00 ECONOMIC VS. SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainability (Yrs)
2000000.00 SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING

FRAME SYSTEM
1000000.00 CHEVRON BRACING SYSTEM
CROSS BRACING SYSTEM

0.00
5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Figure 4-188. Economic vs. Sustainability
Economic vs Risk-Assessment
Table 4-59 illustrates the effects of the costing of the project and is based upon the story drift of each trade-
off. The cost of the project increases then the story drift will decrease and be more efficient.
Table 4-59. Economic vs. Risk Assessment
System
Percent
Material
Increase Material Cost Material Cost
Risk Risk Cost Risk
(Php) (Php)
(Php)
0% 9,022,977.98 16.13 8,208,742.36 5.15 7,890,994.79 5.8
5% 9,474,126.88 15.3235 8,619,179.48 4.8925 8,285,544.53 5.51
10% 9,925,275.78 13.79115 9,029,616.60 4.40325 8,680,094.27 4.959
15% 10,376,424.68 11.7224775 9,440,053.71 3.7427625 9,074,644.01 4.21515
20% 10,827,573.58 9.377982 9,850,490.83 2.99421 9,469,193.75 3.37212
25% 11,278,722.48 7.0334865 10,260,927.95 2.2456575 9,863,743.49 2.52909
ECONOMIC VS. RISK

18
16
14
SPECIAL
12 MOMENT
10 RESISTING
Risk
FRAME SYSTEM
8 CHEVRON
6 BRACING
SYSTEM
4
2
0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Figure 4-189. Economic vs. Risk Assessment
295
Economic vs Safety
Table 4-60 illustrates the concern of safety to the material cost; the data of safety is in percentage. When the
material cost increases, the safer it is, and this is because when the project cost is increasing the concern of
safety is prioritized.
Table 4-60. Economic vs. Safety

System
Percent
Material
Safety Safety Cost Safety
(Php) (Php)
(Php)
0% 9,022,977.98 100 8,208,742.36 168.06 7,890,994.79 164.01
5% 9,474,126.88 105 8,619,179.48 176.463 8,285,544.53 172.2105
10% 9,925,275.78 115.5 9,029,616.60 194.1093 8,680,094.27 189.43155
15% 10,376,424.68 132.825 9,440,053.71 223.225695 9,074,644.01 217.846283
20% 10,827,573.58 159.39 9,850,490.83 267.870834 9,469,193.75 261.415539
25% 11,278,722.48 199.2375 10,260,927.95 334.838543 9,863,743.49 326.769424
ECONOMIC VS. SAFETY

400
350
300 SPECIAL MOMENT
250 RESISTING FRAME
SYSTEM
Safety
200
CHEVRON BRACING
150 SYSTEM
100
CROSS BRACING
50 SYSTEM
0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Figure 4-190. Economic vs. Safety
Economic vs Uncertainty
Table 4-61 illustrates the concern of uncertainty to the cost of the project; the data of uncertainty is in
percentage. The higher the cost, the lower the uncertainty is, and it is because to the relativity of the story to
it thus it also decreases when the price increase.
296
Table 4-61. Economic vs. Uncertainty
System
Percent
Material
Uncertainty Uncertainty Cost Uncertainty
(Php) (Php)
(Php)
0% 9,022,977.98 100 8,208,742.36 31.94 7,890,994.79 35.99
5% 9,474,126.88 95 8,619,179.48 30.34 8,285,544.53 34.1905
10% 9,925,275.78 85.5 9,029,616.60 27.31 8,680,094.27 30.77145
15% 10,376,424.68 72.675 9,440,053.71 23.21 9,074,644.01 26.1557325
20% 10,827,573.58 58.14 9,850,490.83 18.57 9,469,193.75 20.924586
25% 11,278,722.48 43.605 10,260,927.95 13.93 9,863,743.49 15.6934395
ECONOMIC VS. UNCERTAINTY

120
100
80 SPECIAL
Uncertainty
MOMENT
RESISTING
60 FRAME SYSTEM
CHEVRON
BRACING SYSTEM
40
20
0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Figure 4-191. Economic vs. Uncertainty
297
Chapter 5: Final Design
5.1 Final Design of Winning Trade-off
This section displays the final design findings of the governing trade-offs after the final normalization
method and sensitivity analysis have been completed. Finally, the final ranking and sensitivity analysis were
dictated by the last specified trade-off, which is SMRF with X-Bracing.
The proposed Materials Recovery Facility in San Jose del Monte, Bulacan, will have a total material
cost and labor cost of Php 7,890,994.79, total construction days of 90 days, maintenance cost of Php
1,972,748.70 for 50 years, maximum story drift of 5.80 mm, safety percentage of 164.01 percent, and
uncertainty percentage of 35.99 percent based on the conducted estimates and design.
Final Beam Designs
Table 5-1. Final Schedule of Beams along X-Direction

FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
1-1 W12X30 1 5.16624 140.34 11.18 2TR 1-1
2-2 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 2-2
3-3 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 3-3
2TR 4-4 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 4-4
5-5 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 5-5
6-6 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 6-6
7-7 W12X30 1 5.16624 165.61 11.18 313.44 7-7
1-1 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 ROOF 1-1
2-2 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 2-2
3-3 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 3-3
ROOF 4-4 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 4-4
5-5 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 5-5
6-6 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 6-6
7-7 W14X30 2 5.16624 170.94 9.78 351.54 7-7
298
Table 5-2. Final Schedule of Beams along Z-Direction
LENGTH, FLANGE WEB
A-A W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
B-B W12X26 2 2.5 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
B-B W12X26 2 1.6 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
B-B W12X26 1 1.8 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
2F
C-C W12X26 2 2.5 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W12X26 2 1.6 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W12X26 1 1.8 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
D-D W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
2TR C-C W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
A-A W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
RB
C-C W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
TR B-B W8X18 6 5 133.35 8.38 206.76 5.84
Table 5-3. Final Schedule of Intermediate Beams

FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
1-1 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
1-A W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2-2 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2F
2-A W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
2-B W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
3-3 W12X19 1 5 101.73 8.89 308.86 5.97
Final Column Designs
Table 5-4. Final Schedule of Columns

FLANGE WEB
LENGTH,
mm
A-A W14X43 7 3.375 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
B-B W14X43 1 3.75 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
B-B W14X43 1 8.05 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
1 B-B W12X26 2 3.75 164.85 9.65 310.39 5.84
C-C W14X43 3 3.75 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
C-C W14X43 4 5.05 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
D-D W12X40 7 3.75 203.33 13.08 303.28 7.49
299
A-A W14X43 7 3.375 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
B-B W14X43 1 4.3 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
2
C-C W14X43 3 3 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
C-C W14X43 4 1.7 203.07 13.46 352.81 9.53
Final Bracing Designs
Table 5-5. Final Schedule of Bracings

LENGTH,
m
Roof Bracing L5x5x5/16 12 7.18958 127 127 7.874
L6X6X5/16 8 6.03246 152.4 152.4 7.874
Cross Bracing L6X6X5/16 4 6.25 152.4 152.4 7.874
L6X6X5/16 4 5.2811 152.4 152.4 7.874
300
Final Beams Framing Plan
Figure 5-1.2nd Floor Beam Framing Plan
301
302
303
Final Columns Framing Plan
304
Final Steel Connection Details
305
Figure 5-5. Steel Connection Details
Final Base Plate Connection Details
306
307
Final Footing Framing Plan and Sections
Figure 5-7. Final Footing Framing Plan
308
5.2 Final Estimate of Winning Trade-off
Table 5-6. Summary of Final Estimates of the Winning Trade-off

Project Name: Design of Materials Recovery Facility
Location: Baranggay Tungkong Mangga, San Jose Del Monte,
Project Owner: Group 12
Bulacan
Trade-off 3
PAY
ITE Unit Total
QUANTI
M DESCRIPTION UNIT Material Material
TY
Cost Cost
NO.
I General Requirements Labor and Materials
A General Requirements
10000.0 10000.0
Building Permit Fees 1.00 Lot
0 0
B Mobilization
10000.0 10000.0
Temporary Barracks 1.00 Job
0 0
10000.0 60000.0
Portable Toilet 6.00 Job
0 0
II EARTHWORKS Materials
A Excavation
150073.
Footing 362.54 cu.m 413.95
43
B Backfiling
49168.9
Footing 118.78 cu.m 413.95
8
Total Cost Amount

Materials 10000.00
Equipments/Tools Cost 269242.41
Labor Cost 39360.00
TOTAL COST (Site Mobilization and Earth Works) 318602.41
309
III CONCRETE WORKS Materials
A Footing
148137.
Portland Cement (40kg) 624.00 bags 237.40
60
Wash Sand 57.50 cu.m 93.00 5347.50
Cobble Gravel Base 75.00 cu.m 69.00 5175.00
B Rebar Reinforcements (Footing)

76832.0
16mmØ X 6.0m Deformed Reinforcement Bar 196.00 pcs 392.00
0
No.16 GI Tie Wire 58.4 kg 78.68 4594.91
C Base Pedestal
78816.8
0
Wash Sand 38.00 cu.m 93.00 3534.00
D Rebar Reinforcements (Base Pedestal)

26264.0
0
No.16 GI Tie Wire 8.85 kg 78.68 696.32
Total Cost Amount

Materials 353055.13
Labor Cost 99287.80
TOTAL COST (Concrete Works) 477342.93
IV Steel Works Materials
A Columns
100095.
W12X40 1552.11 kg 64.49
57
461231.
W14X43 7042.77 kg 65.49
01
310
B Beams
299009.
W8X18 4784.92 kg 62.49
65
53619.2
W12X19 kg 63.49
844.53 1
67500.0
W12X26 1063.16 kg 63.49
3
101994.
W12X30 1606.46 kg 63.49
15
205386.
W14X30 3234.95 kg 63.49
98
D Bracing
L5X5X5/16 1338.58 kg 61.15 61.15
107046.
L6X6X5/16 1750.55 kg 61.15
13
Total Cost Amount

Materials 1395943.87
Labor Cost 558377.55
TOTAL COST (Steel Works) 2029521.42
IV MASONRY WORKS Materials
A External Walls (Layering/Plastering)

257341.
60
Wash Sand 39.90 c.um 93.00 3710.70
17484.4
0
47207.8
6"Concrete Hollow Block 2622.66 pcs 18.00
8
No.16 GI Tie Wire 15.36 kg 78.68 1208.52
B Internal Walls (Layering/Plastering)

754219.
80
Wash Sand 77.70 c.um 93.00 7226.10
311
61194.0
0
73432.8
4"Concrete Hollow Block 6119.40 pcs 12.00
0
No.16 GI Tie Wire 46.93 kg 78.68 3692.45
Total Cost Amount

Equipments/Tools Cost
TOTAL COST (Masonry Works) 1594733.73
V DOORS AND WINDOWS Materials
A Doors
Main Door - FlushType Door 2 sets 1829.53 3659.06
135000. 270000.
Roller Shutter door 2 set
00 00
Room Doors - Flush Type Door 3 sets 1385.00 4155.00
B Windows
10350.0
Jalousie Window 15 sets 690.00
0
16523.2 115662.
xox Horizontal Slider 7 sets
3 61
Total Cost Amount

Materials 403826.67
TOTAL COST (Doors and Windows Works) 524974.67
VI TILE WORKS Materials
A Tiles
12699.0
APO Pearl Mist Vinyl Tile (30x30) (for Office) 612 pcs 20.75
0
B Mortar
312
Portland Cement (40kg) 34 bags 237.40 8071.60
Tile Adhesive Cement 10 bags 291.00 2910.00
ABC tile grout 11 bags 180.00 1980.00
Total Cost Amount

Materials 25660.60
Labor Cost 7698.18
TOTAL COST (Tile Works) 33358.78
BATTER BOARDS, FORMWORKS AND

VII Materials
SCAFOLDING
sheet 65960.0
1/2" Thk Ordinary Plywood 97 680.00
s 0
2" X 3" X 8' Coco Lumber 783.00 pcs 140.00 109620
39875.0
2" X 4" X 8' Good Lumber 319.00 pcs 125.00
0
2" X 2" X 8' Good Lumber 991.00 pcs 105.00 104055
2" Common Wire Nails 3.5 kg 65.00 227.50
Used Oil 34.00 gals 15.00 510.00
Total Cost Amount

Materials 321207.50
Labor Cost 96362.25
TOTAL COST (Wood & Scafolding Works) 417569.75
VIII PAINTING WORKS Materials

Exterior and Interior Walls (semi-gloss paint 521181.
597 gal 873.00
finish) 00
89900.0
Exterior and Interior Ceilings (flat paint finish) 145 gal 620.00
0
Doors Paint finish (QDE paint finish) 11 gal 506.40 5570.40
12024.0
Steel Casement Windows (QDE paint finish) 24 gal 501.00
0
Total Cost Amount
313
Materials 628675.40
TOTAL COST (Painting Works) 817278.02
DIRECT COST
I&
Site Mobilization and Earthworks 318602.41
II
III Concrete Works 477342.93
IV Steel Works 2029521.42
V Masonry Works 1594733.73
VI Doors and Windows 524974.67
VII Tile Works 33358.78
VIII Batter Boards, Formworks & Scaffolding 417569.75
IX Painting Works 817278.02
TOTAL DIRECT COST 6213381.72
OVERHEAD, CONTINGENCY, & 10.00

621338.1723
MISCELLANEOUS (OCM) %
PROFIT 5% 310669.0861
VALUE ADDED TAX (VAT) 12% 745605.8067
TOTAL PROJECT COST 7890994.79
314
REFERENCES
Asgarian, B. et.al (2010, February 1). Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frames
Through Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Science Direct.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0143974X09002090?via%3Dihub
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP). (2010). National Structural Code of the
Philippines (Vol. 1, 7th ed.).
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP). (1994). ASEP Steel Handbook (2nd ed.).
Aramyan, P. (2021, October 8). What is Constructability in Project Management and How to Use it. Easy
Projects and Birdie Blog. https://explore.easyprojects.net/blog/what-is-constructability-in-project-
management-and-how-to-use-it
Briefing, A. (2021, August 20). Minimum Wages in ASEAN for 2021. ASEAN Business News.
https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/minimum-wages-in-asean-for-2021/
Chan, A. (2011) Seismic Evaluation & Design: Special Moment Resisting Frame Structure.
https://canadacollege.edu/comets/internship/CE_FinalReport.pdf
Civil Lead (n.d.) What is bracing? I Types of Bracing System I Types of Bracing Advantages,
Disadvantages. https://www.civillead.com/types-of-bracing-system/#Cross_Bracing_or_X_Bracing
City of San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan. (n.d.). Socioeconomic And Physical Profile Demography
https://csjdm.gov.ph/socioeconomic-and-physical-profile/demography/
Constructionor (n.d.) Moment Resisting Frame. https://constructionor.com/moment-resisting-frame/
Department of Trade and Industry. (2020). Cities and Municipalities Competitiveness Index. CMCI.
https://cmci.dti.gov.ph/prov-profile.php?prov=Bulacan
Designing Buildings. (2019, January 22). Dead loads. https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Dead_loads

Designing Buildings. (2019, January 23). Live loads. https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Live_loads
Domingo, S., & Manejar, A. J. (2021, January 27). Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Philippine
Institute for Development Studies. https://www.pids.gov.ph/publications/7192
Espino, M.V. (2006). Good Governance in Integrated Solid Waste Management: Case Studies of San Jose
del Monte City and Barangay Narra (Special Problem Paper). University of the Philippines Diliman,
Quezon City, Philippines.
FaultFinder. (2015). Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (PHIVOLCS) and GeologicalSurvey
of Japan (GSJ), AIST. All Rights Reserved. http://faultfinder.phivolcs.dost.gov.ph/
315
Gatley, N. (2019, February 2). What is sustainable construction and why is it important? British Assessment
Bureau. https://www.british-assessment.co.uk/insights/what-is-sustainable-construction-and-why-is-
it-important/
Glass on Web. (2017, April 11). What is Wind Load and Why is it Important in Architectural Glazing?
https://www.glassonweb.com/article/what-wind-load-and-why-it-important-architectural-glazing
Go Construct. (2020, September 25). Sustainability in construction. https://www.goconstruct.org/why-

choose-construction/whats-happening-in-construction/sustainability-in-construction-1/ Keller, A.
(2020). Jet Grouting. KELLER. https://www.keller.co.uk/expertise/techniques/jet-grouting
Grover, S. (2017) The Advantages of Cross Bracing in Steel Structures.

https://homesteady.com/advantages-cross-bracing-steel-structures-7531112.html
Kim, J. et.al (2003, January). Seismic design of Low-Rise Steel Frames With Buckling-Restrained Braces.
https://shb.skku.edu/_res/hibs/etc/14.pdf
Landfills in the Philippines. (2021). National Solid Waste Management Council. http://nswmc.emb.gov.ph/wp-
content/uploads/2021/06/landfills-may2021.pdf
Mayuga, J. L. (2021, January 10). The garbage conundrum | Jonathan L. Mayuga. BusinessMirror.
https://businessmirror.com.ph/2021/01/10/the-garbage-conundrum/
Miguel, M. (2021, January). DENR News Alerts. Department of Environment and Natural Resources of the
Philippines.https://www.denr.gov.ph/images/DENR_News_Alerts/DENR_News_Alerts_26_January
_2021_Tuesday.pdf
Miguel, M. (n.d.). Solid Waste Management Program. Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://denr.gov.ph/?id=790
National Wages and Productivity Commission. (2017). Pay Standards and Practices. Department of Labor
and Employment. https://nwpc.dole.gov.ph/wp-
content/uploads/2020/04/Construction_04.2020_v.2.pdf
Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. (1977, February 19). Presidential Decree No. 1096, s.
1977. https://mirror.officialgazette.gov.ph/1977/02/19/presidential-decree-no-1096-s-1977/
Provincial Disaster Coordinating Council (n.d.). Bulacan Hazard Maps. Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Council. https://pdcc.bulacan.gov.ph/hazardmaps.php
Publications - Senate of the Philippines. (2017). Senate Economic Planning Office.
http://legacy.senate.gov.ph/publications/SEPO/AAG_Philippine%20Solid%20Wastes_Nov2017.pdf
Rafezy, B. (2017). What Makes a Special Moment Frame SPECIAL?
https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-
steel/archives/2017/04/whatmakesaspecialmomentframespecial.pdf
316
Razak, S. M. et.al (2017). A Review of Influence of Various Types of Structural Bracing to the Structural
Performance of Buildings. https://www.e3s-
conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2018/09/e3sconf_cenviron2018_01010.pdf
Robert, N. (1999). Seismic Design and Behaviour of Chevron Steel Braced Frames, 1 6.
https://www.caee.ca/8CCEEpdf/45%20-
%20Seismic%20Design%20And%20Behaviour%20Of%20Chevron%20Steel%20Braced%20Fram
es. . .%20N.%20Robert.pdf
Robert, N. and Tremblay, R. (n.d.) SEISMIC DESIGN AND BEHAVIOUR OF CHEVRON STEEL BRACED
FRAMES. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/2413.pdf
Roshan, A. and Farahoni, R. (2015) An Overview of Pros and Cons of Zipper Braced Frames.
http://www.cwejournal.org/vol10noSpecial/an-overview-of-pros-and-cons-of-zipper-braced-
frames/#:~:text=The%20chevron%20bracing%20system%20provides,and%20joints%20show%20
elastic%20behavior.
Sabouri-ghoma, S. and Ebadi, P. (2008) Concept improvement of behavior of X-Bracing systems by using
Easy-Going Steel. https://www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_05-01-0563.pdf
San Jose Del Monte City Planning and Development Office. (2020). City of San Jose Del Monte Socio-
Economic Profile 2020.
Seismic Resilience (n.d.) Moment Frames.
http://www.seismicresilience.org.nz/topics/superstructure/seismic-design-concepts/moment-
frames/
Seong-Hoon, H. et.al (2017, April 17). Earthquake-Induced Loss Assessment of Steel Frame Buildings With
Special Moment Frames Designed In Highly Seismic Regions. Wiley Online Library.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/eqe.2898?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=O94_qu5LH8bilgVoi
yjactP_zX6AkRLnpp2OIIvQroM-1641540701-0-gaNycGzNCH0
Shivendra. (2020, November 5). What are constraints in the construction business?
https://shivendra.com/blogs/f/what-are-the-constraints-in-the-construction-business
Staff, R. T. (2011, October 21). Republic Services Upgrades Anaheim, Calif., MRF. Recycling Today.
https://www.recyclingtoday.com/article/republic-services-anaheim-mrf-phase/
Titish, A. and Gupta, M.K. (2015) A Study of the Various Structural Framing Systems Subjected to Seismic
Loads. https://www.internationaljournalssrg.org/IJCE/2015/Volume2-Issue4/IJCE-V2I4P105.pdf
Trading Economics. (2019). United States - Time Required to Build s Warehouse (days) - 2022 Data 2023
Forecast 2005 2019 Historical. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/time-required-to-build-
a-warehouse-days-wb-data.html
317
Wissmann, K., Williamson T., & Fitzpatrick B. (n.d.) Experience and Challenges of Geopier Construction on
the Gulf Coast. http://www2.egr.uh.edu/~civeb1/CIGMAT/04_present/4.pdf
World Bank Group. (2018a, September 20). Trends in Solid Waste Management.
https://datatopics.worldbank.org/what-a-waste/trends_in_solid_waste_management.html
World Bank Group. (2018b, September 20). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste
Management to 2050. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317
United Nations Environment Program. (2017). Summary Report: Waste Management in ASEAN Countries.
Association of Southeast Asian Nations. https://environment.asean.org/summary-report-waste-
management-in-asean-countries/
318
APPENDIX A: INITIAL ESTIMATES COMPUTATION
A.1 Economic Constraint

Based on the Gross Internal Floor Area (GIFA) which was last updated in Q3 of 2021, an unbraced steel
frame structure which is a low-rise, short-spanned and have composite floors has a total material cost of
Php17,521.50 per square meter in each floor level. (N.A, 2021)
It was also stated that steel frames with X-Bracing have 24% more material cost compared to unbraced frame
structure. While steel frames with Inverted V-Bracing have 13.6% more material cost compared to unbraced
frame structure. (Rezvani & Taghizadeh, 2017)
Floor Levels = 2
Total Area of the Structure

= (30m x 15m) + (10m x 5m)
= 500 sqm2

Material Cost per square meter in each floor level = Php 17,521.5
Material Cost = (500 sqm2) (P17,521.5) = Php 8,760,750.00
Material Cost for SMRF = Php 8,760,750.00

Material Cost = (Unbraced Frame x 13.6%) + Unbraced Frame
Material Cost = Php 8,760,750.00x 1.136
Material Cost for Chevron Bracing System = Php 9,952,212.00

Material Cost = (Unbraced Frame x 24%) + Unbraced Frame
Material Cost = Php 8,760,750.00x 1.24
Material Cost for Cross-Bracing System = Php 10,863,330.00
A.2 Constructability Constraint

Based on the 2017 ASPBI, the average annual labor cost in the construction industry is P185,507 per
employee. The average number of working days per month is said to be at 22 days. Due to that, the
researchers have come up with an average daily labor cost of Php 702.68.
319
World Bank Group (2019) have said that in order for us to build a low-rise, short span structure like the
designers to set the project duration per trade-off with a minimum of 81 days.

Average Daily Labor = Php 702.68
Number of Workers = 30 workers
Schedule of days = 81 days
Labor Cost = (Php 702.68) (30) (81)

Labor Cost for Special Moment Resisting Frame = Php 1,707,512.4

Labor Cost = (Php 702.68) (30) (85)

Labor Cost for Chevron Bracing System = Php 1,791,834

Labor Cost = (Php 702.68) (30) (88)

Labor Cost for Cross Bracing System = Php 1,855,075.2
A.3 Sustainability Constraint
According to American Institute of Steel Constructions (AISC), the maintenance cost of a steel structure is
about 4% of its material cost per 10 years of lifespan. The minimum lifespan of a steel member is 50 years.

Lifespan = 50 years
Maintenance Cost = (Php 6,536,395.575) (0.04) ( )
Maintenance Cost = Php 1,307,279.115
320
Lifespan = 50 years
Maintenance Cost = 4% of material cost per 10-year period

Lifespan = 50 years
A.4 Risk Assessment Constraint
According to the study of Alshamari, O. (2009) the different bracing types have different story drift from floor
level 4.

2.79 inch converting it to mm it will be equal to
= 70.87 mm
Chevron Bracing
=31.24 mm
Cross Bracing
=35.56 mm
A.5 Safety Constraint

Initial estimate of Safety Constraint
Chevron-Bracing System Cross-Bracing System
Resisting System
100% 155.92% 149.82%
Story drift of each bracing types:
SMRF: 70.87 mm
321
Chevron: 31.24 mm
Cross-bracing: 35.56 mm
For SMRF
For Chevron Bracing System
For Cross-Bracing System
A.6 Uncertainty Constraint

According to Alshmari, O. et. al (2009) there different story drift of each bracing types and using
percentage differences, the designers have come up with the percentage for the uncertainty constraint
Special moment frame resisting

system
100% 44.08% 50.18%
322
Lateral drift of each bracing types
Chevron: 31.24 mm
Cross-bracing: 35.56 mm
SMRF: 70.87 mm
For SMRF
For Cross-Bracing System
323
APPENDIX B: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
No. 6 Frank Street, Jem 9 Subd. Tandang Sora, Quezon City
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
CONSULTING SERVICES FOR GEOLOGICAL & GEOTECHNICAL SURVEYS/INVESTIGATION FOR

THE PROPOSED VATIOUS PROJECTS OF SUB SOIL EXPLORATION FOR BRIDGES, FLOOD
CONTROL, & OTHER STRUCTURES OF REGION III
CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURES NCR/BULACAN BDRY. BIGTE IPO DAM

STO CRISTO SITE 4
Brgy. Proper San Jose Del Monte Bulacan
Prepared for
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
Prepared by:
Reynaldo P. Cruz, Jr.,

MSc Civil Engineer
CE 82898
PTR 1689582
Issued 03 January
2019 Meycauayan
City
324
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONREPORT
CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL STRUCTURES ALONG NCR/BULACAN

BOUNDARY-BIGTE-IPO DAM ROAD, ILOG BAYAN RIVER,
SAN JOSE DEL MONTE CITY, BULACAN, SITE 4
Prepared for
Department of Public Works and Highways
Prepared by
Core Land Specialist and Development Co.
December 2020
325
Contents
1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1
2. Objective and Scope of Investigation ............................................................................................ 1
3. Geologic Setting .............................................................................................................................. 1
3.1. Regional Geology ......................................................................................................................... 1
3.2. Site Geology ................................................................................................................................. 1
4. Methods of Geohazard Assessment .............................................................................................. 1
4.1. Review of Hazard Maps and other Existing Information ............................................................... 1
4.2. Geological Characterization of the Site ........................................................................................ 4
5. Methods of Geotechnical Investigation ......................................................................................... 4
5.1. Drilling, In-Situ Testing, and Sampling.......................................................................................... 4
5.2. Laboratory Index Testing .............................................................................................................. 5
5.3. Interpreting Test Data ................................................................................................................... 5
6. Subsurface Soil and Rock Conditions ........................................................................................... 6
7. Groundwater Conditions................................................................................................................. 6
8. Results and Recommendations of Geohazards Assessment...................................................... 6
8.1. Seismic Shaking Hazard .............................................................................................................. 6
8.2. Surface Fault Rupture Hazard ...................................................................................................... 7
8.3. Ground Lurching ........................................................................................................................... 7
8.4. Liquefaction Hazard...................................................................................................................... 7
8.5. Landsliding ................................................................................................................................... 7
8.6. Water Inundation .......................................................................................................................... 8
8.7. Shrink-Swell Potential of Near-Surface Soil ................................................................................. 8
9. Results and Recommendations of Geotechnical Investigation................................................... 8
9.1. General......................................................................................................................................... 8
9.2. Retaining Structures ..................................................................................................................... 8
10. Limitations ..................................................................................................................................... 11
11. References Cited ........................................................................................................................... 12
Appendices
A: Borehole Location Plan
B: Laboratory Test Results
C: Final Boring Log

D: Photographs
326
Tables
Table 1. Borehole location and total depth

.......................................................................................................................................................................
4
Table 2. Estimated saturated unit weight and undrained shear strength parameters of the subsurface soil at
the location of borehole BH-01
.....................................................................................................................................................................
9
.....................................................................................................................................................................
9
.....................................................................................................................................................................
9
.....................................................................................................................................................................
9
.....................................................................................................................................................................
10
.....................................................................................................................................................................
10
.....................................................................................................................................................................
10
.....................................................................................................................................................................
10
Table 10. Estimated saturated unit weight and undrained shear strength parameters of the subsurface soil
at the location of borehole BH-09
.....................................................................................................................................................................
10
327
Figures
Figure 1. Google Earth image showing the project location and exploratory boreholes drilled
.......................................................................................................................................................................
1
Figure 2. Geological map of Montalban Quadrangle indicating the location of site (Bureau of Mines and
Geo-Sciences, 1983)
.....................................................................................................................................................................
2
328
Introduction
This report presents the results of geotechnical investigation and geohazard assessment conducted by Core
Land Specialist and Development Co. for the Construction of Flood Control Structures along NCR/Bulacan
Boundary-Bigte-Ipo Dam Road, Ilog bayan River, San Jose del Monte City, Bulacan. The Google Earth image
in Figure 1 shows the general site location.
Objective and Scope of Investigation

The objective of this investigation was to determine the geotechnical and geological conditions of the site
and provide recommendations pertaining to
subsurface soil and rock conditions

groundwater conditions
seismic and geologic hazards
foundation design
site grading and earthworks
The scope of investigation performed to achieve the above objectives included review of existing geological
information, study of primary and secondary earthquake-related hazards, and evaluation of subsurface data
acquired using soil drilling, in situ testing, and laboratory testing.
The investigation was conducted in accordance with the procedures in 2015 DPWH Design Guidelines,
Criteria & Standards Volume 2A Geohazard Assessment and Volume 2C Geological & Geotechnical
Investigations.
Except in those instances where it is separately defined, units and symbols used in this report have been
chosen in accordance with those recommended by the International Society for Soil Mechanics and
Geotechnical Engineering (www.issmge.org).
Geologic Setting
Regional Geology
Bulacan is a section of a much larger geologic structure the Luzon Central Valley, also called Luzon Central
Basin an elongated basin that opens to Lingayen Gulf on the northwest and to Manila Bay on the south.
Extending about 140 km in length and averaging 80 km in width, this well-defined basin lies between two
mountain ranges, the north-south trending Zambales Range on the west and Southern Sierra Madre
extending along the Pacific coast on the east. The Luzon Central Valley consists of gently sloping ground
covered with young alluvial sediments.
Figure 1. Google Earth image showing the project location and exploratory boreholes drilled
The relatively symmetrical synclinal valley contains sedimentary rocks and sediments that is as much as 14-
km thick in the southern part of the basin. During the Eocene (about 40 million years ago) and early Oligocene
(about 30 million years ago), deposition varied with locations and conditions. The Central Luzon Valley
attained its present geometry during early to middle Miocene (about 17 million years ago). The non-marine
sediments began to accumulate in the Pliocene (about 3 million years ago) along central latitudes of the basin
and gradually filled in the low valleys as far as the present shorelines of Lingayen Gulf and Manila Bay. As
the area was overlaid with sedimentary deposits subsidence continued in the whole plain into the ensuing
Quaternary epoch that began about 2 million years ago (Bachman, 1983).
Site Geology
The municipality of San Jose del Monte is geographically located at the southern part of Bulacan. So far as
is shown on the 1:50,000 scale Geologic Map of Montalban Quadrangle (Bureau of Mines and Geo-Sciences,
1983), the rocks forming the project site are predominantly tuff and tuff breccia called Diliman Tuff, the upper
member of Guadalupe Formation.
Diliman Tuff refers to the deposits of ash and pumice ejected during the enormous volcanic eruptions that
took place during the Pleistocene, about 1.8 million to 12,000 years ago. The location of the volcanoes that
produced this vast amount of ash is not entirely clear, but it is believed that they stood somewhere along the
present Taal Volcano and the central lobe of Laguna de Bay. The Diliman Tuff is composed mostly of ash-
sized material, but other types of rock were blasted out and included into the tuff as well. The volcanic
sediments were converted into relatively weak porous rock by burial and compaction, or by being welded
together from heat, forming horizontal continuous layers. The Diliman Tuff resembles clastic sedimentary
rock.
Methods of Geohazard Assessment
Review of Hazard Maps and other Existing Information
In addition to seismic shaking, the DPWH requires consideration of other potential geohazards in project
design. Thereupon, this investigation was conducted in a manner that would identify existing and potential
seismic and geologic hazards, examine the nature and processes that trigger the hazard, determine potential
impacts, and recommend approaches to their mitigation.
Information available from various sources geological and geohazard maps and reports, and geotechnical
investigation archives were reviewed and analyzed. Geohazard maps provided guidance to ensure that
hazard assessments are conducted where required. The Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology
(PHIVOLCS), Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB), and National Mapping and Resource Information
Authority (NAMRIA) provide maps that define potential hazard areas.
Figure 2. Geological map of Montalban Quadrangle indicating the location of site (Bureau of Mines and
Geo-Sciences, 1983)
Figure 2. (continued)
Geological Characterization of the Site
Other physical variables that are relevant for investigating geohazard potential include surficial
and bedrock geology (borehole data, geological maps, and cross sections), structural geology (joints,
bedding planes, and faults), and slope angle and direction. The area studied provided coverage of the
physical environment potentially significant to the project.
The geological characterization was undertaken before the geotechnical investigation was
completed and the data analyzed because the findings of the geological characterization have
important influence on the geotechnical parameters. The integration of geotechnical investigation and
geological characterization provided a comprehensive analysis of geologic hazards that may affect the
site.
Methods of Geotechnical Investigation

Drilling, In-Situ Testing, and Sampling
The field investigation comprised drilling of six boreholes (designated as BH-01 to BH-06) and in-
situ testing and sampling of the subsurface strata were undertaken at the locations and depths given in
Table 1 and shown on the map in Appendix A.
Table 1. Borehole location and total depth
Borehole Total depth,

number Northing Easting m
BH-01 14° 49' 50.39" N 121° 02'36.51" E 14.50
BH-02 14° 49' 51.42" N 121° 02'38.22" E 15.00
BH-03 14° 49' 52.39" N 121° 02'39.96" E 14.50
BH-04 14° 49' 52.78" N 121° 0'41.92" E 15.50
BH-05 14° 49' 52.39" N 121° 02'43.90" E 14.00
BH-06 14° 49' 51.29" N 121° 02'45.56" E 14.00
BH-07 14° 49' 49.70" N 121° 02'46.71" E 15.50
BH-08 14° 49' 47.76" N 121° 02'46.70" E 12.50
BH-09 14° 49' 45.80" N 121° 02'46.81" E 15.50
ASTM D1586 Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) and Split-Barrel
Sampling of Soils was undertaken for evaluation of in-situ soil strength and to obtain representative
samples for strata identification purposes.
Rotary core drilling described in ASTM D2113 Standard Practice for Rock Core Drilling and
Sampling of Rock for Site Exploration was used to obtain core samples of rock that cannot be
penetrated by conventional sampling techniques.
Laboratory Index Testing
Upon completion of the fieldwork, soil and rock samples obtained were transported to Core Land Specialist
and Development Co. laboratory for further examination and testing. The laboratory tests included the following:
ASTM D2216 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil
and Rock by Mass
STM D6913 Standard Test Methods for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve
Analysis
ASTM D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
The results of the laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the site are included in Appendix
B. The soil samples were classified in accordance with ASTM D2487 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils
for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). This system groups soils according to their texture
and plasticity. The soil group symbol is shown on the borehole logs.
The strength of rock materials was characterized using simple index tests carried out according to the
International Society of Rock Mechanics (ISRM) Suggested Methods (Brown, 1981).
Interpreting Test Data
The geotechnical design of various types of retaining structures are used in civil engineering require
determination of basic soil parameters
unit weight of the soil

angle of friction
cohesion c for both the wall backfill and the base soil.
Retaining walls are designed according to undrained shear strength because the in the short- term condition
is usually the most critical in design. SPT data are commonly used to estimate the undrained soil parameters.
The SPT blow count in the field is corrected to an efficiency of 60% prior to being used for the determination
of design parameters. The corrected value of the SPT result N can provide an indirect measure of the degree of
compactness and effective angle of friction of granular soils. The empirical correlation between friction angle
and N presented in graphical form by Peck, et al (1974) is approximated by the expression (Wolff, 1989)
° = 27.1 + 0.3 0.00054 2 (1)
To a lesser degree, N can give an estimate the undrained shear strength cu of cohesive soils. The determination
of cohesive soils in its in-situ state ensures no moisture content change since cu is related to the moisture content.
The approximate relationship for cohesive soil types can be defined in the simple form (Bowles, 1997):
=6 (2)
Silts rarely occur in a pure form and are generally mixed with either sand or clay. It is therefore usually possible
to classify silty soils as being either granular or cohesive. Sandy silts have characteristics of a fine sand. When
there is a reasonable amount of clay material within the soil, silt can be assumed to be cohesive, with the
characteristics of a soft clay (Smith, 2014).
Empirical correlations are treated with caution and adjusted as appropriate by experience prior to being used
for the selection of design parameters.
Subsurface Soil and Rock Conditions
The geotechnical profile of the area consists of soils with varying grading and density in the upper layers
changing to slightly weathered pyroclastic rock. The manual index test (ISRM, 1981) showed rock strength of
recovered cores varying from very weak to weak.
The subsurface conditions and basic engineering properties are summarized in Tables 2 to 8.
Specific conditions encountered at the borehole location are indicated on the borehole logs in Appendix C.
The borehole log was prepared from the field log which was edited after visual re- examination of the soil samples
in the laboratory and results of classification tests.
Groundwater Conditions
At the time of field investigation, groundwater depth was observed at depths ranging from
1.00 m to 1.80 m below existing ground level. Some fluctuation in hydrostatic groundwater levels and perched
water conditions should be anticipated with variations in the seasonal rainfall and surface runoff.
Results and Recommendations of Geohazards Assessment

Seismic Shaking Hazard
The probability that the site will be subject to strong seismic shaking from a moderate to large earthquake on a
major active fault in the region is high. Maximum ground shaking at the project area would be expected to result
from a large earthquake on the West Valley Fault located 10.8 km southeast. Rimando and Knuepfer (2006)
estimated earthquake magnitudes within the range M 7.3 - 7.7 for the West Valley Fault
Surface Fault Rupture Hazard
In addition to ground shaking causing direct damage to structures, earthquakes can cause surface fault
rupture. Ground movement along an active fault in an earthquake can cause surface break, resulting in severe
damage to structures or other development straddling the fault.
The potential for earthquake-induced surface rupture is considered low since the most recent compilation of
Quaternary-active faults by PHIVOLCS (2015) indicated no active faults pass through the site. PHIVOLCS
considers fault to be active if there is evidence that it has moved within the past 10,000 years.
Ground Lurching
Ground lurching is the lateral movement of soil, sediments, or fill located on sloping ground, such as hillsides
and riverbanks, forming series of more or less parallel cracks separating the ground into rough blocks.
Unconsolidated earth materials with low cohesion are most susceptible to lurching effects.
The proximity of the site to the riverbank suggests ground lurching could pose a hazard to this project area.
Proper assessment and mitigation of potential negative effects on the project should be considered.
Liquefaction Hazard
Another significant earthquake-induced ground failure is soil liquefaction. It is a physical process that takes
place during some earthquakes, causing loose soil to act like water rather than a solid. Liquefied soil may be
unable to support its own weight or that of structures, which could result in loss of foundation bearing or differential
settlement. Liquefaction may also result in cracks in the ground surface followed by the emergence of a sand-
water mixture, as it did in the vicinity of the central business area of Dagupan City during the July 1990 Luzon
earthquake (Tokimatsu et al, 1994).
The potential for liquefaction at the site is low due to sufficiently cohesive fines content (Bray and Sancio, 2006)
in the upper layers and sufficient compactness as reflected by high corrected blow counts (Idriss and Boulanger,
2006) in the lower layers.
Landsliding
A landslide is the movement of a mass of rock, debris, or earth down a slope due to gravity. Earthquakes can
cause landslides where hillside slopes are steep and made of weak materials that can fall apart when shaken.
The plans will not require specific design for this hazard
Water Inundation
Due to lack of nearby open bodies of water, the possibility of the seiches or tsunami is considered to be no
impact for this site.
Shrink-Swell Potential of Near-Surface Soil
Some soils, such as clays, tend to shrink and swell when their water content changes. This expansive
property can put pressure on structure and foundation walls and cause them damage.
Because of the relatively insignificant amounts of clay present in the alluvial deposits, expansive soils are
generally not considered a hazard in the project area. If shallow foundations are in direct contact within the clays,
the expansive soil may be removed and replaced with new compacted non-expansive soil (gravel and sand) to
reduce the detrimental effects of swelling at the project footprint. Designs may include thicker slabs and extra
reinforcing to increase strength in resisting the differential effect of differential movements.
Results and Recommendations of Geotechnical Investigation

General
Construction of the project is considered feasible from a geotechnical and geological perspective. However,
the susceptibility to soil lurching within the project area cannot be totally discounted.
Retaining Structures
Retaining structures may be needed to contain high river levels and protect riverbanks from degradation. The
type of retaining structure that can be used will depend upon the change in ground surface profile. The retaining
structure may be gravity wall or embedded wall (non-gravity wall).
Gravity walls are generally used when the supported height is relatively small, in areas above the water level,
and where there is adequate bearing capacity at a shallow depth from the surface. Unlike gravity walls, embedded
walls do not require a strong bearing layer and are therefore preferred (in the form of steel sheet piling) in providing
vertical support to waterfront construction (Clayton, et al., 2013).
The design of a retaining structure is an iterative process. An initial wall geometry is assigned to the wall and all
applicable loads acting on the wall are calculated. These forces are then checked using appropriate factors of safety
and the geometry of the wall is then revised until satisfactory factors of safety are obtained. The design of retaining wall
is beyond the scope of this geotechnical investigation
Tables 2 to 8 is intended to provide the design designer the fundamental properties of foundation soil.
Soil type Layer Unit weight Friction Cohesion, cu
thickness, m sat (kN/m3) angle, (°) (kPa)
Granular 0.0 - 1.0 20 30 0
Granular 1.0 - 2.0 21 34 0
Granular 2.0 - 4.0 22 40 0
Bedrock >4.0 22 40 0

Cohesive 0.0 - 1.0 16 0 83
Granular 1.0 - 2.0 21 34 0
Granular 2.0 - 3.0 22 40 0
Bedrock >3.0 22 40 0

Cohesive 0.0 - 1.0 16 0 49
Cohesive 1.0 - 2.0 18 0 75
Granular 2.0 - 3.0 21 32 0
Granular 3.0 - 4.0 22 40 0
Bedrock >4.0 22 40 0

Granular 0.0 - 1.0 19 32 0
Granular 1.0 - 3.0 20 30 0
Granular 3.0 - 14.0 22 40 0
Bedrock >14.0 22 40 0

Granular 0.0 - 1.0 19 34 0
Granular 1.0 - 5.0 22 40 0
Bedrock >5.0 22 40 0

Granular 0.0 - 1.0 14 28 0
Granular 1.0 - 2.0 20 31 0
Granular 2.0 - 5.0 21 35 0
Granular 5.0 - 11.0 22 40 0
Bedrock >11.0 22 40 0

Granular 0.0 - 3.0 18 29 0
Granular 3.0 - 4.0 21 31 0
Cohesive 4.0 - 15.5 20 0 375

Granular 0.0 - 1.0 15 29 0
Granular 1.0 - 2.0 20 29 0
Granular 2.0 - 3.0 21 36 0
Cohesive 3.0 - 12.5 20 0 375
thickness, m sat (kN/m )
3 angle, (°) (kPa)
Granular 0.0 - 1.0 14 28 0
Granular 1.0 - 2.0 18 28 0
Cohesive 2.0 - 9.5 20 0 308
Granular 9.5 - 12.5 22 40 0

Cohesive 12.5 - 15.5 20 0 375
Limitations
This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practice. No
other warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Reynaldo P. Cruz, Jr.,MSc

Civil Engineer 082898
PTR 4678234 issued on 07 January 2020
Meycauayan City
References Cited
Bachman, S. B., Lewis, S. D., and Schweller, W. J., 1983. Evolution of a forearc basin, Luzon Central Valley,
Philippines. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 67: 1143-1162.
Boulanger, R. W., and I. M. Idriss, 2006. Liquefaction Susceptibility Criteria for Silts and Clays, ASCE Journal of
Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(6), pp. 641-652
Bowles, J. E., 1997. Foundation analysis and design, 5th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1168 pp
Bray, J.D. and R.B. Sancio, 2006. Assessment of the Liquefaction Susceptibility of Fine-Grained Soils, Journal
of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, September 2006, Vol. 132, No. 9, pp. 1165-1177.
Brown, E. T. (ed.), 1981. Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: International Society for Rock
Mechanics Suggested Methods, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 211 pp
Clayton, C. R. I., Woods, R. I., Bond, A. J., and Milititsky, J., 2013. Earth Pressure and Earth- Retaining Structures
Third Edition. Taylor & Francis Group, LCC, 574 pp
Defant, M. J., DeBoer, J. Z. and Oles, D., 1988. The western Central Luzon Arc, the Philippines: two arcs divided
by rifting? Tectonophysics, 145: 305-317
Department of Public Works and Highways, 2015. Design Guidelines, Criteria & Standards Volume 2A Geohazard
Assessment
Department of Public Works and Highways, 2015. Design Guidelines, Criteria & Standards Volume 2C Geological
& Geotechnical Investigations
International Society for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1981. Technical terms, symbols and
definitions in English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish used in soil mechanics and
foundation engineering. Toronto: ISSMFE
Idriss, I. M. and Boulanger, R. W, 2006. Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during
earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26 (2006) pp. 115 130
Meyerhof, G. 1965. Shallow foundations. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, SM2,
Vol. 91, Jan., pp 21-31
Meyerhof, G. 1976. Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations. Proceedings of the American Society of
Civil Engineers, GT3, Vol. 102, March 1976, pp 195-227.
Mines and Geo-Sciences Bureau, 1996. Geologic Map of Santa Maria Quadrangle. Unpublished 1:50,000 scale
Peck, R.B., Hanson, W.E., and Thornburn, T.H. (1974). Foundation Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
485 pp
Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology, 2016. Distribution of Active Faults and Trenches in the
Philippines
READY for GMMA Project, 2014. Liquefaction Hazard Map of Marilao. Scale 1:50,000
Rimando, R. E. and Knuepfer, P. L. K., 2006. Neotectonics of the Marikina Valley fault system (MVFS) and
tectonic framework of structures in northern and central Luzon, Philippines. Tectonophysics 415, 17-38.
Skempton, A.W. 1951. The bearing capacity of clays, Proceedings of Building Research Congress,
London, 1-3, pp 180-189.
Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., and Mersi, G., 1996. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. John Willey, New York,
549 pp
Tokimatsu, K., Kojima, J., Kuwayama, A.A., and Midorikawa, S., 1994. Liquefaction-induced damage to buildings
I 1990 Luzon Earthquake, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering ASCE, 120(2), 290-307.
Youd, J. L. and Perkins, D. M., 1978. Mapping of liquefaction induced ground failure potential.
Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 104, pp. 433 446.
343
APPENDIX C: STRESS CHECK FOR DESIGN TRADE OFFS
C.1 Trade-off 1: Beam Utilization Table
Analysis Design Actual Allowable Normalized Ratio

Beam Property Property Ratio Ratio (Actual/Allowable) Clause L/C Status
Rect
1 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
3 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
4 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
5 W14X61 W14X61 0.366 1 0.366 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
6 W14X61 W14X61 0.359 1 0.359 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
8 W14X61 W14X61 0.161 1 0.161 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
9 W14X61 W14X61 0.427 1 0.427 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
10 W14X30 W14X30 0.703 1 0.703 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
11 W14X30 W14X30 0.661 1 0.661 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
13 W12X30 W12X30 0.785 1 0.785 1b 115 PASS
Rect
15 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
17 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
18 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
19 W14X61 W14X61 0.356 1 0.356 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
20 W14X61 W14X61 0.262 1 0.262 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
22 W14X61 W14X61 0.156 1 0.156 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
23 W14X61 W14X61 0.411 1 0.411 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
24 W14X30 W14X30 0.672 1 0.672 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
25 W14X30 W14X30 0.635 1 0.635 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
27 W12X30 W12X30 0.783 1 0.783 1b 115 PASS
344
Rect
29 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
30 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
31 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
32 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
33 W14X61 W14X61 0.371 1 0.371 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
34 W14X61 W14X61 0.468 1 0.468 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
35 W14X61 W14X61 0.224 1 0.224 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
36 W14X61 W14X61 0.191 1 0.191 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
37 W14X61 W14X61 0.433 1 0.433 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
38 W14X30 W14X30 0.708 1 0.708 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
39 W14X30 W14X30 0.663 1 0.663 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
40 W12X35 W12X35 0.33 1 0.33 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
41 W12X30 W12X30 0.787 1 0.787 1b 115 PASS
Rect
43 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
44 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
45 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
46 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
47 W14X61 W14X61 0.376 1 0.376 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
48 W14X61 W14X61 0.486 1 0.486 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
49 W14X61 W14X61 0.192 1 0.192 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
50 W14X61 W14X61 0.174 1 0.174 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
51 W14X61 W14X61 0.436 1 0.436 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
52 W14X30 W14X30 0.714 1 0.714 1b 102 PASS
345
Eq. H1-
53 W14X30 W14X30 0.659 1 0.659 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
54 W12X35 W12X35 0.46 1 0.46 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
55 W12X30 W12X30 0.791 1 0.791 1b 115 PASS
Rect
57 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
58 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
59 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
60 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
61 W14X61 W14X61 0.314 1 0.314 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
62 W14X61 W14X61 0.395 1 0.395 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
63 W14X61 W14X61 0.226 1 0.226 1b 115 PASS
Eq. H1-
64 W14X61 W14X61 0.098 1 0.098 1b 112 PASS
Eq. H1-
65 W14X61 W14X61 0.338 1 0.338 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
66 W14X30 W14X30 0.297 1 0.297 1b 104 PASS
Eq. H1-
67 W14X30 W14X30 0.246 1 0.246 1b 111 PASS
Eq. H1-
68 W16X50 W16X50 0.177 1 0.177 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
69 W12X30 W12X30 0.804 1 0.804 1b 115 PASS
Eq. H1-
70 W16X50 W16X50 0.087 1 0.087 1b 115 PASS
Eq. H1-
71 W12X26 W12X26 0.355 1 0.355 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
72 W12X26 W12X26 0.493 1 0.493 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
73 W12X26 W12X26 0.302 1 0.302 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
74 W12X26 W12X26 0.419 1 0.419 1b 106 PASS
Rect
75 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
76 0.40x0.25 N/A
346
Rect
77 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
78 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
79 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
80 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
81 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
82 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
83 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
84 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
85 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
86 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
87 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
88 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
89 0.40x0.25 N/A
Eq. H1-
90 W16X31 W16X31 0.196 1 0.196 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
91 W16X31 W16X31 0.192 1 0.192 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
92 W16X31 W16X31 0.179 1 0.179 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
93 W16X31 W16X31 0.26 1 0.26 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
94 W16X31 W16X31 0.02 1 0.02 1b 100 PASS
Eq. H1-
95 W16X31 W16X31 0.029 1 0.029 1b 105 PASS
96 W16X31 W16X31 0.067 1 0.067 Sec. E1 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
97 W16X31 W16X31 0.03 1 0.03 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
98 W16X31 W16X31 0.352 1 0.352 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
99 W16X31 W16X31 0.35 1 0.35 1b 105 PASS
347
Eq. H1-
100 W16X31 W16X31 0.303 1 0.303 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
101 W16X31 W16X31 0.555 1 0.555 1b 105 PASS
Rect
102 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
104 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
105 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
106 W14X61 W14X61 0.379 1 0.379 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
107 W14X61 W14X61 0.365 1 0.365 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
109 W14X61 W14X61 0.17 1 0.17 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
110 W14X61 W14X61 0.442 1 0.442 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
111 W14X30 W14X30 0.717 1 0.717 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
112 W14X30 W14X30 0.664 1 0.664 1b 102 PASS
Eq. H1-
114 W12X30 W12X30 0.792 1 0.792 1b 115 PASS
Eq. H1-
116 W16X31 W16X31 0.178 1 0.178 1b 106 PASS
Rect
117 0.40x0.25 N/A
118 W16X31 W16X31 0.082 1 0.082 Sec. E1 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
119 W16X31 W16X31 0.079 1 0.079 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
120 W16X31 W16X31 0.3 1 0.3 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
121 W12X19 W12X19 0.012 1 0.012 1b 103 PASS
Eq. H1-
122 W12X19 W12X19 0.51 1 0.51 1b 101 PASS
Eq. H1-
123 W12X19 W12X19 0.315 1 0.315 1b 101 PASS
Eq. H1-
124 W16X31 W16X31 0.079 1 0.079 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
125 W16X31 W16X31 0.085 1 0.085 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
126 W16X31 W16X31 0.08 1 0.08 1b 106 PASS
348
Eq. H1-
127 W16X31 W16X31 0.096 1 0.096 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
128 W14X61 W14X61 0.148 1 0.148 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
129 W14X61 W14X61 0.298 1 0.298 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
130 W16X31 W16X31 0.463 1 0.463 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
131 W14X61 W14X61 0.287 1 0.287 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
132 W14X61 W14X61 0.242 1 0.242 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
133 W14X61 W14X61 0.291 1 0.291 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
134 W14X61 W14X61 0.294 1 0.294 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
135 W16X31 W16X31 0.693 1 0.693 1b 109 PASS
Eq. H1-
136 W16X31 W16X31 0.47 1 0.47 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
137 W16X31 W16X31 0.483 1 0.483 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
138 W16X31 W16X31 0.491 1 0.491 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
139 W16X31 W16X31 0.244 1 0.244 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
140 W16X31 W16X31 0.29 1 0.29 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
141 W16X31 W16X31 0.248 1 0.248 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
142 W16X31 W16X31 0.148 1 0.148 2 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
143 W16X31 W16X31 0.215 1 0.215 1b 105 PASS
Rect
148 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
149 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
150 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
151 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
152 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
153 0.40x0.25 N/A
349
Rect
154 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
155 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
156 0.40x0.25 N/A
Eq. H2-
173 L80808 L80808 0.03 1 0.03 1 105 PASS
Eq. H2-
174 L80808 L80808 0.03 1 0.03 1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
175 L80808 L80808 0.01 1 0.01 1 118 PASS
Eq. H2-
176 L80808 L80808 0.01 1 0.01 1 113 PASS
Eq. H2-
179 L80808 L80808 0.032 1 0.032 1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
180 L80808 L80808 0.032 1 0.032 1 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
185 W12X26 W12X26 0.189 1 0.189 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
186 W12X26 W12X26 0.172 1 0.172 1b 103 PASS
Eq. H1-
187 W12X19 W12X19 0.204 1 0.204 1b 101 PASS
Eq. H1-
188 W12X26 W12X26 0.57 1 0.57 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
189 W12X26 W12X26 0.399 1 0.399 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
190 W12X26 W12X26 0.368 1 0.368 1b 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
191 W12X19 W12X19 0.4 1 0.4 1b 101 PASS
Eq. H1-
192 W12X26 W12X26 0.358 1 0.358 1b 103 PASS
Eq. H1-
193 W12X19 W12X19 0.621 1 0.621 1b 101 PASS
Rect
194 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
195 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
196 0.50x0.50 N/A
Eq. H1-
197 W14X61 W14X61 0.315 1 0.315 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
198 W14X61 W14X61 0.243 1 0.243 1b 111 PASS
350
Eq. H1-
199 W14X61 W14X61 0.096 1 0.096 1b 112 PASS
Eq. H1-
200 W14X61 W14X61 0.343 1 0.343 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
201 W14X30 W14X30 0.23 1 0.23 1b 111 PASS
Eq. H1-
202 W14X30 W14X30 0.234 1 0.234 1b 111 PASS
Eq. H1-
203 W12X30 W12X30 0.795 1 0.795 1b 115 PASS
Eq. H1-
204 W16X31 W16X31 0.261 1 0.261 1b 106 PASS
Rect
205 0.40x0.25 N/A
206 W16X31 W16X31 0.048 1 0.048 Sec. E1 117 PASS
Eq. H1-
207 W16X31 W16X31 0.088 1 0.088 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
208 W16X31 W16X31 0.56 1 0.56 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
209 W14X61 W14X61 0.149 1 0.149 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
210 W16X31 W16X31 0.704 1 0.704 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
211 W16X31 W16X31 0.394 1 0.394 1b 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
212 W16X50 W16X50 0.204 1 0.204 1b 117 PASS
Rect
213 0.50x0.50 N/A
Rect
214 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
215 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
216 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
217 0.40x0.25 N/A
Rect
218 0.40x0.25 N/A
Eq. H2-
219 L80808 L80808 0.03 1 0.03 1 105 PASS
Eq. H2-
220 L80808 L80808 0.03 1 0.03 1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
221 L80808 L80808 0.011 1 0.011 1 118 PASS
351
Eq. H2-
222 L80808 L80808 0.01 1 0.01 1 117 PASS
Eq. H2-
223 L80808 L80808 0.031 1 0.031 1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
224 L80808 L80808 0.03 1 0.03 1 105 PASS

Beam Clause L/C Status
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Actual/Allowable)
Rect
1 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
3 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
4 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
5 W12X40 W12X40 0.38 1 0.38 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
6 W14X43 W14X43 0.361 1 0.361 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
8 W14X43 W14X43 0.302 1 0.302 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
9 W14X43 W14X43 0.21 1 0.21 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
10 W14X30 W14X30 0.639 1 0.639 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
11 W14X30 W14X30 0.626 1 0.626 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
13 W12X30 W12X30 0.774 1 0.774 115 PASS
1b
Rect
15 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
17 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
18 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
19 W12X40 W12X40 0.379 1 0.379 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
20 W14X43 W14X43 0.356 1 0.356 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
22 W14X43 W14X43 0.213 1 0.213 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
23 W14X43 W14X43 0.214 1 0.214 111 PASS
1b
352
Eq. H1-
24 W14X30 W14X30 0.612 1 0.612 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
25 W14X30 W14X30 0.602 1 0.602 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
27 W12X30 W12X30 0.772 1 0.772 115 PASS
1b
Rect
29 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
30 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
31 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
32 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
33 W12X40 W12X40 0.381 1 0.381 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
34 W14X43 W14X43 0.328 1 0.328 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
35 W14X43 W14X43 0.291 1 0.291 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
36 W14X43 W14X43 0.334 1 0.334 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
37 W14X43 W14X43 0.209 1 0.209 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
38 W14X30 W14X30 0.645 1 0.645 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
39 W14X30 W14X30 0.628 1 0.628 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
40 W12X26 W12X26 0.307 1 0.307 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
41 W12X30 W12X30 0.775 1 0.775 115 PASS
1b
Rect
43 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
44 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
45 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
46 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
47 W12X40 W12X40 0.382 1 0.382 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
48 W14X43 W14X43 0.337 1 0.337 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
49 W14X43 W14X43 0.282 1 0.282 105 PASS
1b
353
Eq. H1-
50 W14X43 W14X43 0.327 1 0.327 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
51 W14X43 W14X43 0.21 1 0.21 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
52 W14X30 W14X30 0.64 1 0.64 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
53 W14X30 W14X30 0.622 1 0.622 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
54 W12X26 W12X26 0.365 1 0.365 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
55 W12X30 W12X30 0.777 1 0.777 115 PASS
1b
Rect
57 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
58 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
59 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
60 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
61 W12X40 W12X40 0.38 1 0.38 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
62 W14X43 W14X43 0.253 1 0.253 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
63 W14X43 W14X43 0.302 1 0.302 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
64 W14X43 W14X43 0.139 1 0.139 112 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
65 W14X43 W14X43 0.208 1 0.208 117 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
66 W14X30 W14X30 0.271 1 0.271 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
67 W14X30 W14X30 0.238 1 0.238 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
68 W14X43 W14X43 0.26 1 0.26 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
69 W12X30 W12X30 0.775 1 0.775 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
70 W14X43 W14X43 0.186 1 0.186 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
71 W12X26 W12X26 0.226 1 0.226 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
72 W12X26 W12X26 0.433 1 0.433 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
73 W12X26 W12X26 0.312 1 0.312 103 PASS
1b
354
Eq. H1-
74 W12X26 W12X26 0.51 1 0.51 103 PASS
1b
Rect
75 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
76 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
77 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
78 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
79 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
80 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
81 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
82 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
83 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
84 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
85 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
86 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
87 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
88 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
89 N/A
0.40x0.25
Eq. H1-
90 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
91 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
92 W8X18 W8X18 0.262 1 0.262 105 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
93 W8X18 W8X18 0.037 1 0.037 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
94 W8X18 W8X18 0.045 1 0.045 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
95 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
96 W8X18 W8X18 0.169 1 0.169 Sec. E1 106 PASS
355
97 W8X18 W8X18 0.107 1 0.107 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
98 W8X18 W8X18 0.031 1 0.031 103 PASS
2
Eq. H1-
99 W8X18 W8X18 0.031 1 0.031 103 PASS
2
Eq. H1-
100 W8X18 W8X18 0.29 1 0.29 105 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
101 W8X18 W8X18 0.041 1 0.041 118 PASS
1b
Rect
102 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
104 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
105 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
106 W12X40 W12X40 0.382 1 0.382 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
107 W14X43 W14X43 0.365 1 0.365 118 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
109 W14X43 W14X43 0.305 1 0.305 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
110 W14X43 W14X43 0.21 1 0.21 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
111 W14X30 W14X30 0.643 1 0.643 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
112 W14X30 W14X30 0.627 1 0.627 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
114 W12X30 W12X30 0.778 1 0.778 115 PASS
1b
116 W8X18 W8X18 0.088 1 0.088 Sec. E1 109 PASS
Rect
117 N/A
0.40x0.25
118 W8X18 W8X18 0.12 1 0.12 Sec. E1 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
119 W8X18 W8X18 0.034 1 0.034 104 PASS
1b
120 W8X18 W8X18 0.095 1 0.095 Sec. E1 109 PASS
Eq. H1-
121 W12X19 W12X19 0.012 1 0.012 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
122 W12X19 W12X19 0.51 1 0.51 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
123 W12X19 W12X19 0.315 1 0.315 101 PASS
1b
124 W8X18 W8X18 0.058 1 0.058 Sec. E1 110 PASS
Eq. H1-
125 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
356
Eq. H1-
126 W8X18 W8X18 0.042 1 0.042 108 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
127 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
128 W14X43 W14X43 0.208 1 0.208 117 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
129 W14X43 W14X43 0.263 1 0.263 111 PASS
1b
130 W8X18 W8X18 0.057 1 0.057 Sec. E1 109 PASS
Eq. H1-
131 W14X43 W14X43 0.263 1 0.263 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
132 W14X43 W14X43 0.27 1 0.27 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
133 W14X43 W14X43 0.262 1 0.262 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
134 W14X43 W14X43 0.264 1 0.264 111 PASS
1b
135 W8X18 W8X18 0.078 1 0.078 Sec. E1 118 PASS
136 W8X18 W8X18 0.177 1 0.177 Sec. E1 109 PASS
Eq. H1-
137 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
138 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
139 W8X18 W8X18 0.156 1 0.156 Sec. E1 106 PASS
140 W8X18 W8X18 0.063 1 0.063 Sec. E1 106 PASS
141 W8X18 W8X18 0.055 1 0.055 Sec. E1 106 PASS
142 W8X18 W8X18 0.198 1 0.198 Sec. E1 110 PASS
143 W8X18 W8X18 0.09 1 0.09 Sec. E1 110 PASS
Rect
148 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
149 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
150 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
151 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
152 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
153 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
154 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
155 N/A
0.40x0.25
357
Rect
156 N/A
0.40x0.25
Eq. H2-
161 L50505 L50505 0.496 1 0.496 105 PASS
1
162 L50505 L50505 0.544 1 0.544 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
163 L50505 L50505 0.552 1 0.552 105 PASS
1
164 L50505 L50505 0.57 1 0.57 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
167 L50505 L50505 0.613 1 0.613 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
168 L50505 L50505 0.672 1 0.672 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
173 L80808 L80808 0.043 1 0.043 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
174 L80808 L80808 0.044 1 0.044 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
175 L80808 L80808 0.01 1 0.01 117 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
176 L80808 L80808 0.008 1 0.008 117 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
179 L80808 L80808 0.052 1 0.052 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
180 L80808 L80808 0.053 1 0.053 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
183 L50505 L50505 0.036 1 0.036 109 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
184 L50505 L50505 0.026 1 0.026 106 PASS
1
Eq. H1-
185 W12X26 W12X26 0.217 1 0.217 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
186 W12X26 W12X26 0.308 1 0.308 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
187 W12X19 W12X19 0.204 1 0.204 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
188 W12X26 W12X26 0.407 1 0.407 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
189 W12X26 W12X26 0.416 1 0.416 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
190 W12X26 W12X26 0.296 1 0.296 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
191 W12X19 W12X19 0.4 1 0.4 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
192 W12X26 W12X26 0.51 1 0.51 103 PASS
1b
358
Eq. H1-
193 W12X19 W12X19 0.621 1 0.621 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
196 W8X18 W8X18 0.292 1 0.292 106 PASS
1a
197 W8X18 W8X18 0.184 1 0.184 Sec. E1 110 PASS
199 W8X18 W8X18 0.044 1 0.044 Sec. E1 117 PASS
Eq. H1-
201 W8X18 W8X18 0.315 1 0.315 106 PASS
1a
Rect
202 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
203 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
204 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
205 W12X40 W12X40 0.379 1 0.379 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
206 W14X43 W14X43 0.415 1 0.415 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
207 W14X43 W14X43 0.212 1 0.212 118 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
208 W14X43 W14X43 0.187 1 0.187 118 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
209 W14X30 W14X30 0.224 1 0.224 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
210 W14X30 W14X30 0.228 1 0.228 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
211 W12X30 W12X30 0.774 1 0.774 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
212 W8X18 W8X18 0.036 1 0.036 105 PASS
1b
Rect
213 N/A PASS
0.40x0.25
214 W8X18 W8X18 0.074 1 0.074 Sec. E1 117 PASS
Eq. H1-
215 W8X18 W8X18 0.042 1 0.042 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
216 W8X18 W8X18 0.041 1 0.041 117 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
217 W14X43 W14X43 0.188 1 0.188 118 PASS
1b
218 W8X18 W8X18 0.078 1 0.078 Sec. E1 117 PASS
219 W8X18 W8X18 0.091 1 0.091 Sec. E1 117 PASS
Eq. H1-
220 W14X43 W14X43 0.214 1 0.214 117 PASS
1b
Rect
221 N/A
0.50x0.50
359
Rect
222 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
223 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
224 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
225 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
226 N/A
0.40x0.25
227 W8X18 W8X18 0.081 1 0.081 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
228 L50505 L50505 0.534 1 0.534 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
229 L50505 L50505 0.503 1 0.503 106 PASS
1
230 W8X18 W8X18 0.056 1 0.056 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
231 L50505 L50505 0.56 1 0.56 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
232 L50505 L50505 0.559 1 0.559 106 PASS
1
233 W8X18 W8X18 0.089 1 0.089 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H2-
234 L50505 L50505 0.663 1 0.663 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
235 L50505 L50505 0.613 1 0.613 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
236 L80808 L80808 0.043 1 0.043 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
237 L80808 L80808 0.043 1 0.043 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
238 L80808 L80808 0.008 1 0.008 118 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
239 L80808 L80808 0.008 1 0.008 114 PASS
1
Eq. Sec.
240 L80808 L80808 0.051 1 0.051 106 PASS
D2
Eq. H2-
241 L80808 L80808 0.05 1 0.05 105 PASS
1
Eq. H1-
242 W8X18 W8X18 0.035 1 0.035 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H2-
243 L50505 L50505 0.11 1 0.11 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
244 L50505 L50505 0.128 1 0.128 106 PASS
1
360

Beam Clause L/C Status
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Actual/Allowable)
Rect
1 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
3 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
4 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
5 W12X40 W12X40 0.379 1 0.379 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
6 W14X43 W14X43 0.357 1 0.357 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
8 W14X43 W14X43 0.296 1 0.296 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
9 W14X43 W14X43 0.212 1 0.212 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
10 W14X30 W14X30 0.622 1 0.622 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
11 W14X30 W14X30 0.611 1 0.611 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
13 W12X30 W12X30 0.772 1 0.772 115 PASS
1b
Rect
15 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
17 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
18 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
19 W12X40 W12X40 0.379 1 0.379 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
20 W14X43 W14X43 0.357 1 0.357 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
22 W14X43 W14X43 0.213 1 0.213 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
23 W14X43 W14X43 0.214 1 0.214 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
24 W14X30 W14X30 0.612 1 0.612 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
25 W14X30 W14X30 0.602 1 0.602 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
27 W12X30 W12X30 0.772 1 0.772 115 PASS
1b
Rect
29 N/A
0.50x0.50
361
Rect
30 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
31 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
32 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
33 W12X40 W12X40 0.38 1 0.38 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
34 W14X43 W14X43 0.325 1 0.325 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
35 W14X43 W14X43 0.29 1 0.29 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
36 W14X43 W14X43 0.326 1 0.326 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
37 W14X43 W14X43 0.211 1 0.211 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
38 W14X30 W14X30 0.628 1 0.628 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
39 W14X30 W14X30 0.612 1 0.612 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
40 W12X26 W12X26 0.318 1 0.318 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
41 W12X30 W12X30 0.773 1 0.773 115 PASS
1b
Rect
43 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
44 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
45 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
46 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
47 W12X40 W12X40 0.381 1 0.381 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
48 W14X43 W14X43 0.336 1 0.336 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
49 W14X43 W14X43 0.281 1 0.281 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
50 W14X43 W14X43 0.319 1 0.319 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
51 W14X43 W14X43 0.212 1 0.212 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
52 W14X30 W14X30 0.623 1 0.623 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
53 W14X30 W14X30 0.607 1 0.607 102 PASS
1b
362
Eq. H1-
54 W12X26 W12X26 0.38 1 0.38 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
55 W12X30 W12X30 0.775 1 0.775 115 PASS
1b
Rect
57 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
58 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
59 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
60 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
61 W12X40 W12X40 0.38 1 0.38 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
62 W14X43 W14X43 0.253 1 0.253 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
63 W14X43 W14X43 0.302 1 0.302 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
64 W14X43 W14X43 0.139 1 0.139 112 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
65 W14X43 W14X43 0.21 1 0.21 117 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
66 W14X30 W14X30 0.275 1 0.275 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
67 W14X30 W14X30 0.238 1 0.238 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
68 W14X43 W14X43 0.262 1 0.262 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
69 W12X30 W12X30 0.775 1 0.775 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
70 W14X43 W14X43 0.179 1 0.179 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
71 W12X26 W12X26 0.233 1 0.233 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
72 W12X26 W12X26 0.439 1 0.439 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
73 W12X26 W12X26 0.313 1 0.313 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
74 W12X26 W12X26 0.511 1 0.511 103 PASS
1b
Rect
75 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
76 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
77 N/A
0.40x0.25
363
Rect
78 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
79 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
80 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
81 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
82 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
83 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
84 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
85 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
86 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
87 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
88 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
89 N/A
0.40x0.25
Eq. H1-
90 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
91 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
92 W8X18 W8X18 0.3 1 0.3 106 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
93 W8X18 W8X18 0.037 1 0.037 106 PASS
1b
94 W8X18 W8X18 0.05 1 0.05 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
95 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
96 W8X18 W8X18 0.168 1 0.168 Sec. E1 106 PASS
97 W8X18 W8X18 0.105 1 0.105 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
98 W8X18 W8X18 0.033 1 0.033 103 PASS
2
Eq. H1-
99 W8X18 W8X18 0.033 1 0.033 103 PASS
2
Eq. H1-
100 W8X18 W8X18 0.327 1 0.327 106 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
101 W8X18 W8X18 0.041 1 0.041 118 PASS
1b
364
Rect
102 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
104 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
105 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
106 W12X40 W12X40 0.381 1 0.381 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
107 W14X43 W14X43 0.364 1 0.364 118 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
109 W14X43 W14X43 0.301 1 0.301 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
110 W14X43 W14X43 0.211 1 0.211 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
111 W14X30 W14X30 0.626 1 0.626 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
112 W14X30 W14X30 0.612 1 0.612 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
114 W12X30 W12X30 0.776 1 0.776 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
116 W8X18 W8X18 0.296 1 0.296 105 PASS
1a
Rect
117 N/A
0.40x0.25
118 W8X18 W8X18 0.12 1 0.12 Sec. E1 105 PASS
119 W8X18 W8X18 0.083 1 0.083 Sec. E1 110 PASS
Eq. H1-
120 W8X18 W8X18 0.318 1 0.318 105 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
121 W12X19 W12X19 0.012 1 0.012 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
122 W12X19 W12X19 0.51 1 0.51 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
123 W12X19 W12X19 0.315 1 0.315 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
124 W8X18 W8X18 0.043 1 0.043 106 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
125 W8X18 W8X18 0.038 1 0.038 105 PASS
1b
126 W8X18 W8X18 0.047 1 0.047 Sec. E1 105 PASS
Eq. H1-
127 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
128 W14X43 W14X43 0.21 1 0.21 117 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
129 W14X43 W14X43 0.267 1 0.267 111 PASS
1b
365
Eq. H1-
130 W8X18 W8X18 0.358 1 0.358 105 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
131 W14X43 W14X43 0.267 1 0.267 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
132 W14X43 W14X43 0.27 1 0.27 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
133 W14X43 W14X43 0.266 1 0.266 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
134 W14X43 W14X43 0.267 1 0.267 111 PASS
1b
135 W8X18 W8X18 0.078 1 0.078 Sec. E1 118 PASS
Eq. H1-
136 W8X18 W8X18 0.358 1 0.358 106 PASS
1a
Eq. H1-
137 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 100 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
138 W8X18 W8X18 0.028 1 0.028 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
139 W8X18 W8X18 0.266 1 0.266 106 PASS
1a
140 W8X18 W8X18 0.077 1 0.077 Sec. E1 106 PASS
141 W8X18 W8X18 0.07 1 0.07 Sec. E1 106 PASS
Eq. H1-
142 W8X18 W8X18 0.246 1 0.246 106 PASS
1a
143 W8X18 W8X18 0.091 1 0.091 Sec. E1 110 PASS
Rect
148 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
149 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
150 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
151 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
152 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
153 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
154 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
155 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
156 N/A
0.40x0.25
Eq. H2-
161 L60605 L60605 0.11 1 0.11 106 PASS
1
366
Eq. H2-
162 L60605 L60605 0.109 1 0.109 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
163 L60605 L60605 0.132 1 0.132 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
164 L60605 L60605 0.107 1 0.107 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
167 L60605 L60605 0.128 1 0.128 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
168 L60605 L60605 0.107 1 0.107 105 PASS
1
Eq. Sec.
173 L50505 L50505 0.107 1 0.107 105 PASS
D2
Eq. H2-
174 L50505 L50505 0.107 1 0.107 106 PASS
1
Eq. Sec.
175 L50505 L50505 0.014 1 0.014 117 PASS
D2
Eq. Sec.
176 L50505 L50505 0.01 1 0.01 117 PASS
D2
Eq. H2-
179 L50505 L50505 0.13 1 0.13 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
180 L50505 L50505 0.132 1 0.132 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
183 L60605 L60605 0.01 1 0.01 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
184 L60605 L60605 0.018 1 0.018 105 PASS
1
Eq. H1-
185 W12X26 W12X26 0.218 1 0.218 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
186 W12X26 W12X26 0.309 1 0.309 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
187 W12X19 W12X19 0.204 1 0.204 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
188 W12X26 W12X26 0.411 1 0.411 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
189 W12X26 W12X26 0.422 1 0.422 104 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
190 W12X26 W12X26 0.296 1 0.296 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
191 W12X19 W12X19 0.4 1 0.4 101 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
192 W12X26 W12X26 0.511 1 0.511 103 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
193 W12X19 W12X19 0.621 1 0.621 101 PASS
1b
Rect
194 N/A
0.50x0.50
367
Rect
195 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
196 N/A
0.50x0.50
Eq. H1-
197 W12X40 W12X40 0.379 1 0.379 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
198 W14X43 W14X43 0.415 1 0.415 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
199 W14X43 W14X43 0.209 1 0.209 118 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
200 W14X43 W14X43 0.189 1 0.189 118 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
201 W14X30 W14X30 0.224 1 0.224 102 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
202 W14X30 W14X30 0.228 1 0.228 111 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
203 W12X30 W12X30 0.774 1 0.774 115 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
204 W8X18 W8X18 0.037 1 0.037 105 PASS
1b
Rect
205 N/A PASS
0.40x0.25
206 W8X18 W8X18 0.074 1 0.074 Sec. E1 117 PASS
Eq. H1-
207 W8X18 W8X18 0.042 1 0.042 105 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
208 W8X18 W8X18 0.041 1 0.041 117 PASS
1b
Eq. H1-
209 W14X43 W14X43 0.189 1 0.189 118 PASS
1b
210 W8X18 W8X18 0.078 1 0.078 Sec. E1 117 PASS
211 W8X18 W8X18 0.091 1 0.091 Sec. E1 117 PASS
Eq. H1-
212 W14X43 W14X43 0.214 1 0.214 117 PASS
1b
Rect
213 N/A
0.50x0.50
Rect
214 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
215 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
216 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
217 N/A
0.40x0.25
Rect
218 N/A
0.40x0.25
368
Eq. H2-
219 L60605 L60605 0.11 1 0.11 106 PASS
1
Eq. Sec.
220 L60605 L60605 0.108 1 0.108 105 PASS
D2
Eq. H2-
221 L60605 L60605 0.108 1 0.108 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
222 L60605 L60605 0.131 1 0.131 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
223 L60605 L60605 0.107 1 0.107 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
224 L60605 L60605 0.126 1 0.126 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
225 L50505 L50505 0.104 1 0.104 105 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
226 L50505 L50505 0.107 1 0.107 106 PASS
1
Eq. Sec.
227 L50505 L50505 0.011 1 0.011 118 PASS
D2
Eq. Sec.
228 L50505 L50505 0.011 1 0.011 114 PASS
D2
Eq. H2-
229 L50505 L50505 0.128 1 0.128 106 PASS
1
Eq. H2-
230 L50505 L50505 0.124 1 0.124 105 PASS
1
Eq. Sec.
231 L60605 L60605 0.047 1 0.047 106 PASS
D2
Eq. H2-
232 L60605 L60605 0.038 1 0.038 105 PASS
1
369
APPENDIX D: STEEL CONNECTION DESIGN CHECK
D.1 Trade-off 1: Steel Connection Design Check
Current Date: 4/17/2022 1:54:10 AM

Units System: kN_m
Summary Table
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connection NO Group Name Connection Name Ratio Status
1 BCF - N(73) - M (128,66) 0.884 OK
2 BCW - N(74) - (M 70,66) 0.282 OK
3 BCW - N(75) - (M 68,123) 0.237 OK
4 BCF - N(71) - M (63,69) 0.987 OK
5 BCF - N(69) - M (61,69) 0.915 OK
6 BCW - N(90) - M(65,135) 0.648 OK
7 BCF - N(115) - (M 212,206) 0.051 OK
8 BCF - N(75) - M (68,188) 0.713 OK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connection NO: 1
Connection Name: BCF - N(73) - M(128,66)
Report Type: Design report
Design code: AISC 360-16 LRFD
DEMANDS
Description Ru Pu Mu PufTop PufBot PufTop PufBot Pu Vu Load type
kN kN kN*m kN kN kN kN kN kN
LC-1 -6.26 0.01 29.12 -82.69 82.70 0.00 0.00 6.08 78.95 Design
LC-2 6.26 -0.01 -29.09 82.63 -82.64 0.00 0.00 -6.07 78.89 Design
LC-3 -0.42 0.53 1.20 -3.15 3.68 0.00 0.00 -7.87 3.44 Design
LC-4 0.42 -0.54 -1.19 3.12 -3.65 0.00 0.00 8.01 3.42 Design
LC-5 5.52 -0.39 -3.43 9.55 -9.94 0.00 0.00 -6.51 9.44 Design
LC-6 0.05 -0.02 -0.13 0.36 -0.38 0.00 0.00 -0.02 0.36 Design
LC-7 12.10 -0.84 -6.96 19.36 -20.20 0.00 0.00 -12.17 19.19 Design
LC-8 -34.65 -8.11 54.13 -157.81 149.70 0.00 0.00 34.80 150.05 Design
LC-9 -26.90 27.55 2.49 6.69 20.86 0.00 0.00 27.02 6.89 Design
LC-10 -43.13 33.24 34.23 -80.59 113.83 0.00 0.00 41.57 80.46 Design
LC-11 -33.87 34.45 42.43 -103.28 137.73 0.00 0.00 36.11 103.16 Design
LC-100 7.73 -0.55 -4.80 13.37 -13.91 0.00 0.00 -9.11 13.22 Design
LC-101 12.76 -0.92 -7.80 21.71 -22.63 0.00 0.00 -13.93 21.50 Design
LC-102 26.02 -1.82 -15.32 42.61 -44.43 0.00 0.00 -27.30 42.22 Design
LC-103 0.39 -0.47 24.94 -71.06 70.59 0.00 0.00 -1.74 67.91 Design
LC-104 12.91 -0.49 -33.27 94.26 -94.75 0.00 0.00 -13.89 90.40 Design
LC-105 6.24 0.05 -2.98 8.48 -8.44 0.00 0.00 -15.69 8.11 Design
LC-106 7.07 -1.02 -5.37 14.75 -15.77 0.00 0.00 0.20 14.94 Design
LC-107 -1.29 -0.34 26.03 -74.10 73.76 0.00 0.00 0.22 70.80 Design
LC-108 11.23 -0.36 -32.18 91.22 -91.58 0.00 0.00 -11.92 87.39 Design
LC-109 4.56 0.18 -1.89 5.44 -5.27 0.00 0.00 -13.73 5.23 Design
LC-110 5.39 -0.89 -4.28 11.71 -12.60 0.00 0.00 2.16 11.92 Design
LC-111 -29.68 -8.46 51.05 -149.22 140.76 0.00 0.00 28.95 141.02 Design
LC-112 -21.93 27.20 -0.59 15.28 11.92 0.00 0.00 21.16 12.02 Design
LC-113 -38.16 32.89 31.14 -72.00 104.89 0.00 0.00 35.71 71.96 Design
LC-114 -28.90 34.10 39.34 -94.69 128.79 0.00 0.00 30.25 94.66 Design
LC-115 -21.94 -9.01 46.47 -136.50 127.49 0.00 0.00 20.90 127.63 Design
LC-116 -14.20 26.65 -5.17 28.01 -1.35 0.00 0.00 13.11 1.37 Design
LC-117 -30.42 32.34 26.56 -59.28 91.62 0.00 0.00 27.66 59.35 Design
LC-118 -21.16 33.55 34.76 -81.97 115.52 0.00 0.00 22.20 82.05 Design
LC-200 5.52 -0.39 -3.43 9.55 -9.94 0.00 0.00 -6.51 9.44 Design
370
LC-201 17.68 -1.25 -10.52 29.26 -30.51 0.00 0.00 -18.70 28.99 Design
LC-202 14.64 -1.04 -8.75 24.33 -25.37 0.00 0.00 -15.65 24.11 Design
LC-203 0.80 -0.30 13.05 -37.23 36.92 0.00 0.00 -1.61 35.59 Design
LC-204 7.56 -0.31 -18.38 52.05 -52.36 0.00 0.00 -8.17 49.95 Design
LC-205 3.95 -0.02 -2.02 5.73 -5.75 0.00 0.00 -9.15 5.49 Design
LC-206 4.40 -0.60 -3.31 9.11 -9.71 0.00 0.00 -0.57 9.20 Design
LC-207 -0.90 -0.17 14.18 -40.36 40.19 0.00 0.00 0.36 38.56 Design
LC-208 5.87 -0.18 -17.25 48.92 -49.10 0.00 0.00 -6.20 46.85 Design
LC-209 2.26 0.11 -0.89 2.60 -2.49 0.00 0.00 -7.18 2.50 Design
LC-210 2.71 -0.47 -2.19 5.98 -6.45 0.00 0.00 1.40 6.10 Design
LC-211 -11.45 -3.94 21.79 -63.86 59.91 0.00 0.00 10.78 59.99 Design
LC-212 -7.96 12.11 -1.45 10.17 1.93 0.00 0.00 7.28 1.94 Design
LC-213 -15.26 14.66 12.83 -29.11 43.77 0.00 0.00 13.83 29.12 Design
LC-214 -11.10 15.21 16.52 -39.32 54.53 0.00 0.00 11.37 39.34 Design
LC-215 -11.41 -3.96 21.69 -63.59 59.63 0.00 0.00 10.76 59.71 Design
LC-216 -7.93 12.09 -1.55 10.44 1.65 0.00 0.00 7.26 1.66 Design
LC-217 -15.23 14.65 12.73 -28.84 43.49 0.00 0.00 13.81 28.85 Design
LC-218 -11.06 15.20 16.42 -39.05 54.24 0.00 0.00 11.35 39.07 Design
GEOMETRIC CONSIDERATIONS
Dimensions Unit Value Min. Max. Sta. References
Extended end plate

Vertical edge distance [mm] 31.75 19.05 152.40 Sec. J3.5
Horizontal edge distance [mm] 44.45 19.05 152.40 Sec. J3.5
Vertical bolt spacing (external flange) [mm] 50.80 33.87 - Sec. J3.3
Vertical bolt spacing (internal flange) [mm] 50.80 33.87 - Sec. J3.3
Horizontal center-to-center spacing (gage) [mm] 139.70 76.20 170.94 Sec. J3.3, DG4 Sec. 2.4,
DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Inner bolt distance (external flange) [mm] 31.75 25.40 - DG4 Sec. 2.1
Inner bolt distance (internal flange) [mm] 31.75 25.40 - DG4 Sec. 2.1
Bolt diameter [mm] 12.70 - 38.10 DG4 Sec. 1.1
Beam
Weld size (external flange) [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Weld size (internal flange) [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Web [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Support
PLATE / COLUMN BEHAVIOR

End plate behaviour (external flange)
Thin plate behavior controlled by plate yielding
End plate behaviour (internal flange)
Column flange behavior (external flange)
Thick plate behavior controlled by no prying bolt rupture
Column flange behavior (internal flange)
DESIGN CHECK
Verification Unit Capacity Demand Ctrl EQ Ratio References
Moment end plate (external flange)

Flexural yielding [kN*m] 59.63 33.19 LC-104-15 0.56 DG16 Sec 2.5
No prying bolt moment strength [kN*m] 68.23 33.19 LC-104-15 0.49 DG16 Sec 2.5
Bolt rupture with prying moment strength [kN*m] 60.71 33.19 LC-104-15 0.55 DG16 Sec 2.5
Bolts shear [kN] 141.24 43.13 LC-10-9 0.31 Tables (7-1..14)
Bolt bearing under shear load [kN] 457.14 43.13 LC-10-9 0.09 Eq. J3-6
Shear yielding [kN] 389.13 78.91 LC-8-7 0.20 DG4 Eq. 3.12
Moment end plate (internal flange)
371
Beam
Web weld shear strength [kN] 313.01 26.02 LC-102-13 0.08 Eq. J2-4
Web weld strength to reach yield stress [kN/m] 2878.88 2127.79 LC-1-0 0.74 Eq. J2-4, Eq. J4-1
Shear yielding [kN] 497.22 26.02 LC-102-13 0.05 Eq. J4-3
Flange weld capacity (external flange) [kN] 490.07 94.26 LC-104-15 0.19 Eq. J2-4
Flange weld capacity (internal flange) [kN] 490.07 149.70 LC-8-7 0.31 Eq. J2-4
Support
Flexural yielding (external flange) [kN*m] 150.45 33.19 LC-104-15 0.22 DG4 Eq. 3.20, Sec.
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Support bolt bearing (external flange) [kN] 630.38 43.13 LC-10-9 0.07 Eq. J3-6
Flexural yielding (internal flange) [kN*m] 156.91 52.71 LC-8-7 0.34 DG4 Eq. 3.20, Sec.
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Support bolt bearing (internal flange) [kN] 640.38 26.02 LC-102-13 0.04 Eq. J3-6
Panel web shear [kN] 626.03 150.05 LC-8-7 0.24 Sec. J10-6, Eq. J10-9
Support - right side
Local web yielding [kN] 425.78 157.81 LC-8-7 0.37 DG4 eq. 3.24
Top web bearing [kN] 321.45 157.81 LC-8-7 0.49 Eq. J10-5a
Bottom web bearing [kN] 642.91 94.75 LC-104-15 0.15 Eq. J10-4
Global critical strength ratio 0.88
Connection NO: 2
Connection Name: BCW - N(74) - M(70,66)
DEMANDS
Description Ru Pu Mu PufTop PufBot Load type
kN kN kN*m kN kN
LC-1 0.40 1.53 -2.19 7.00 -5.47 Design

LC-2 -0.40 -1.53 2.19 -6.99 5.46 Design
LC-3 0.15 0.60 -0.20 0.85 -0.26 Design
LC-4 -0.16 -0.61 0.20 -0.86 0.25 Design
LC-5 0.29 1.10 -5.23 15.41 -14.30 Design
LC-6 -0.01 -0.03 0.08 -0.25 0.22 Design
LC-7 0.66 2.56 -12.12 35.69 -33.14 Design
LC-8 0.22 0.84 25.02 -70.63 71.48 Design
LC-9 8.41 32.36 21.11 -43.78 76.14 Design
LC-10 10.83 41.64 16.47 -25.96 67.60 Design
LC-11 10.54 40.52 15.55 -23.92 64.44 Design
LC-100 0.40 1.55 -7.32 21.57 -20.02 Design
LC-101 0.66 2.55 -12.20 35.93 -33.37 Design
LC-102 1.40 5.40 -25.62 75.47 -70.07 Design
LC-103 0.74 2.84 -8.43 25.36 -22.52 Design
LC-104 -0.06 -0.22 -4.04 11.37 -11.59 Design
LC-105 0.50 1.91 -6.43 19.22 -17.31 Design
LC-106 0.18 0.70 -6.04 17.50 -16.80 Design
LC-107 0.66 2.53 -6.90 20.87 -18.34 Design
LC-108 -0.14 -0.54 -2.51 6.87 -7.41 Design
LC-109 0.41 1.59 -4.90 14.72 -13.13 Design
LC-110 0.10 0.39 -4.51 13.01 -12.62 Design
372
LC-111 0.48 1.84 20.31 -56.77 58.60 Design
LC-112 8.67 33.35 16.40 -29.92 63.27 Design
LC-113 11.08 42.63 11.76 -12.09 54.72 Design
LC-114 10.79 41.51 10.85 -10.05 51.57 Design
LC-115 0.89 3.43 12.72 -34.43 37.86 Design
LC-116 9.09 34.95 8.82 -7.58 42.52 Design
LC-117 11.50 44.23 4.18 10.25 33.98 Design
LC-118 11.21 43.11 3.26 12.29 30.82 Design
LC-200 0.29 1.10 -5.23 15.41 -14.30 Design
LC-201 0.94 3.63 -17.26 50.85 -47.22 Design
LC-202 0.78 3.00 -14.25 41.99 -38.99 Design
LC-203 0.42 1.63 -5.04 15.15 -13.51 Design
LC-204 -0.01 -0.02 -2.68 7.59 -7.61 Design
LC-205 0.29 1.13 -3.97 11.83 -10.70 Design
LC-206 0.12 0.48 -3.75 10.90 -10.42 Design
LC-207 0.34 1.33 -3.54 10.71 -9.39 Design
LC-208 -0.09 -0.33 -1.17 3.16 -3.49 Design
LC-209 0.21 0.82 -2.46 7.39 -6.58 Design
LC-210 0.04 0.17 -2.25 6.47 -6.30 Design
LC-211 0.31 1.21 7.33 -20.23 21.44 Design
LC-212 4.00 15.39 5.58 -8.15 23.54 Design
LC-213 5.09 19.57 3.49 -0.13 19.69 Design
LC-214 4.96 19.06 3.08 0.79 18.27 Design
LC-215 0.31 1.18 7.40 -20.42 21.60 Design
LC-216 4.00 15.37 5.64 -8.34 23.71 Design
LC-217 5.08 19.54 3.55 -0.32 19.86 Design
LC-218 4.95 19.04 3.14 0.60 18.44 Design
Plate (beam side)

Horizontal center-to-center spacing (gage) [mm] 76.20 67.73 234.70 Sec. J3.3, Sec. J3.5
Top flange plate data
Vertical edge distance [mm] 69.85 31.75 - Tables J3.4, J3.5
Horizontal edge distance [mm] 50.80 31.75 - Tables J3.4, J3.5
Bottom flange plate data
Plate (support side)
Top plate weld size - column flange [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Bottom plate weld size - column flange [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Beam
Support
Flange thickness [mm] 16.00 5.07 - p. 9-5
Web thickness [mm] 9.65 5.07 - p. 9-5
DESIGN CHECK
Top plate (beam side)

Compression [kN] 839.85 66.24 LC-8-7 0.08 Sec. J4.4
Tension yielding [kN] 839.85 70.97 LC-102-13 0.08 Eq. J4-1
Block shear [kN] 319.48 70.97 LC-102-13 0.22 Eq. J4-5
Tension rupture [kN] 897.80 70.97 LC-102-13 0.08 Eq. J4-2
Bottom plate (beam side)
373
Top plate (support side)
Weld to column [kN] 269.74 75.47 LC-102-13 0.28 Eq. J2-4
Shear yielding due to welds [kN] 261.58 70.97 LC-102-13 0.27 [3]
Bottom plate (support side)
Beam
Top flange bending [kN*m] 172.06 25.62 LC-102-13 0.15 Eq. F13-1
Top flange block shear [kN] 336.85 76.14 LC-9-8 0.23 Eq. J4-5
Bottom flange bending [kN*m] 172.06 25.62 LC-102-13 0.15 Eq. F13-1
Bottom flange block shear [kN] 336.85 76.14 LC-9-8 0.23 Eq. J4-5
REFERENCES
[3] Dowswell, B., 2003, Connection Design For Steel Structures, Structural Design Solutions, LLC.
Connection NO: 3
DEMANDS
Description Ru Pu Pu Mu22 Mu33 Load type
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 -6.38 -1.21 3.41 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 6.38 1.23 -3.41 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 -0.11 -24.20 0.15 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 0.11 24.26 -0.15 0.00 Design
LC-5 15.66 -0.04 -47.41 -0.05 0.00 Design
LC-6 7.50 0.00 -14.59 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.08 -27.17 -0.10 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 2.65 54.10 5.21 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.93 32.01 -1.94 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 0.51 7.67 1.14 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 1.41 31.78 2.63 0.00 Design
LC-100 21.92 -0.06 -66.38 -0.07 0.00 Design
LC-101 30.79 -0.09 -93.82 -0.11 0.00 Design
LC-102 22.54 -0.17 -107.66 -0.22 0.00 Design
LC-103 22.54 -6.43 -65.40 3.36 0.00 Design
LC-104 22.54 6.33 -62.96 -3.47 0.00 Design
LC-105 22.54 -0.16 -88.39 0.09 0.00 Design
LC-106 22.54 0.06 -39.93 -0.21 0.00 Design
LC-107 14.09 -6.41 -43.88 3.37 0.00 Design
LC-108 14.09 6.34 -41.44 -3.45 0.00 Design
LC-109 14.09 -0.14 -66.87 0.11 0.00 Design
LC-110 14.09 0.07 -18.41 -0.19 0.00 Design
LC-111 14.09 2.61 11.42 5.17 0.00 Design
LC-112 14.09 -0.97 -10.66 -1.98 0.00 Design
LC-113 14.09 0.47 -35.00 1.10 0.00 Design
LC-114 14.09 1.37 -10.89 2.59 0.00 Design
LC-115 22.54 2.56 -23.68 5.10 0.00 Design
LC-116 22.54 -1.02 -45.76 -2.05 0.00 Design
LC-117 22.54 0.42 -70.10 1.03 0.00 Design
LC-118 22.54 1.32 -45.99 2.52 0.00 Design
LC-200 15.66 -0.04 -47.41 -0.05 0.00 Design
LC-201 23.16 -0.12 -89.17 -0.15 0.00 Design
LC-202 21.28 -0.10 -78.73 -0.12 0.00 Design
374
LC-203 17.37 -3.47 -47.15 1.81 0.00 Design
LC-204 17.37 3.41 -45.84 -1.88 0.00 Design
LC-205 17.37 -0.09 -59.57 0.05 0.00 Design
LC-206 17.37 0.03 -33.40 -0.12 0.00 Design
LC-207 7.05 -3.46 -21.99 1.82 0.00 Design
LC-208 7.05 3.43 -20.67 -1.86 0.00 Design
LC-209 7.05 -0.08 -34.40 0.06 0.00 Design
LC-210 7.05 0.04 -8.23 -0.10 0.00 Design
LC-211 11.74 1.16 -11.22 2.31 0.00 Design
LC-212 11.74 -0.45 -21.15 -0.91 0.00 Design
LC-213 11.74 0.20 -32.11 0.48 0.00 Design
LC-214 11.74 0.60 -21.26 1.15 0.00 Design
LC-215 17.37 1.16 -22.16 2.31 0.00 Design
LC-216 17.37 -0.45 -32.09 -0.91 0.00 Design
LC-217 17.37 0.20 -43.05 0.48 0.00 Design
LC-218 17.37 0.61 -32.20 1.15 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 138.43 276.86 p. 10-104
Vertical center-to-center spacing (pitch) [mm] 76.20 67.73 143.26 Sec. J3.3, Sec. J3.5
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
Weld length [mm] 165.10 38.10 - Sec. J2.2b
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Bolt bearing under shear load [kN] 163.99 30.79 LC-101-12 0.19 Eq. J3-6, p. 7-18
Shear rupture [kN] 239.45 30.79 LC-101-12 0.13 Eq. J4-4
Bolt bearing under axial load [kN] 191.93 6.34 LC-108-19 0.03 Eq. J3-6, p. 7-18
Tear out under axial load [kN] 319.48 6.38 LC-2-1 0.02 Eq. J4-5
Weld capacity [kN] 483.05 30.79 LC-101-12 0.06 Tables 8-4 .. 8-11
Beam
Bolt bearing under axial load [kN] 164.02 6.38 LC-2-1 0.04 Eq. J3-6
Yielding strength due to axial load [kN] 1114.95 6.38 LC-2-1 0.01 Eq. D2-1
Support
Welds rupture [kN/m] 2475.59 124.32 LC-101-12 0.05 p. 9-5
Web plate strength due out-of-plane transverse load [kN] 107.67 6.43 LC-103-14 0.06 p.9-16
375
NOTES
The plate is designed with the extended configuration criteria.
Connection NO: 4
DEMANDS
LC-1 -27.00 -14.48 51.26 -171.94 157.45 0.00 0.00 21.85 171.58 Design
LC-2 26.98 14.48 -51.23 171.81 -157.34 0.00 0.00 -21.90 171.46 Design
LC-3 -0.89 -0.05 1.84 -5.95 5.90 0.00 0.00 -6.99 5.65 Design
LC-4 0.87 0.04 -1.82 5.87 -5.84 0.00 0.00 6.71 5.58 Design
LC-5 5.84 -0.88 -4.95 15.47 -16.35 0.00 0.00 -15.69 15.91 Design
LC-6 -0.01 -0.01 0.03 -0.10 0.09 0.00 0.00 -0.31 0.10 Design
LC-7 13.16 -1.92 -11.27 35.24 -37.16 0.00 0.00 -25.60 36.17 Design
LC-8 -61.12 3.09 104.57 -334.40 337.49 0.00 0.00 74.44 315.10 Design
LC-9 -3.72 26.49 -25.52 95.23 -68.74 0.00 0.00 46.88 89.28 Design
LC-10 -9.18 30.29 5.68 -3.09 33.38 0.00 0.00 38.40 26.97 Design
LC-11 -35.45 27.47 47.09 -137.55 165.02 0.00 0.00 79.06 152.10 Design
LC-100 8.17 -1.23 -6.93 21.66 -22.89 0.00 0.00 -21.97 22.27 Design
LC-101 13.56 -2.03 -11.53 36.02 -38.05 0.00 0.00 -32.12 37.04 Design
LC-102 28.05 -4.14 -23.95 74.89 -79.03 0.00 0.00 -59.95 76.93 Design
LC-103 -20.00 -15.54 45.34 -153.43 137.88 0.00 0.00 2.87 152.55 Design
LC-104 33.98 13.42 -57.15 190.32 -176.91 0.00 0.00 -40.88 190.16 Design
LC-105 6.11 -1.11 -4.08 12.56 -13.67 0.00 0.00 -25.97 13.44 Design
LC-106 7.87 -1.02 -7.75 24.38 -25.41 0.00 0.00 -12.28 24.59 Design
LC-107 -21.75 -15.27 46.81 -158.02 142.74 0.00 0.00 7.73 157.27 Design
LC-108 32.24 13.69 -55.68 185.73 -172.05 0.00 0.00 -36.02 185.70 Design
LC-109 4.37 -0.84 -2.61 7.97 -8.81 0.00 0.00 -21.11 8.71 Design
LC-110 6.13 -0.75 -6.28 19.79 -20.55 0.00 0.00 -7.42 19.86 Design
LC-111 -55.87 2.30 100.11 -320.48 322.78 0.00 0.00 60.32 300.78 Design
LC-112 1.53 25.70 -29.98 109.15 -83.45 0.00 0.00 32.76 102.80 Design
LC-113 -3.93 29.50 1.22 10.83 18.67 0.00 0.00 24.28 12.65 Design
LC-114 -30.19 26.68 42.63 -123.63 150.31 0.00 0.00 64.94 137.78 Design
LC-115 -47.54 1.07 93.01 -298.27 299.34 0.00 0.00 42.65 277.97 Design
LC-116 9.85 24.47 -37.08 131.36 -106.89 0.00 0.00 15.09 124.39 Design
LC-117 4.40 28.27 -5.88 33.04 -4.77 0.00 0.00 6.62 27.65 Design
LC-118 -21.87 25.45 35.53 -101.42 126.87 0.00 0.00 47.28 114.97 Design
LC-200 5.84 -0.88 -4.95 15.47 -16.35 0.00 0.00 -15.69 15.91 Design
LC-201 18.98 -2.81 -16.19 50.60 -53.42 0.00 0.00 -41.60 51.99 Design
LC-202 15.70 -2.33 -13.38 41.82 -44.15 0.00 0.00 -35.12 42.97 Design
LC-203 -10.21 -8.49 23.99 -81.32 72.83 0.00 0.00 -0.20 80.80 Design
LC-204 18.94 7.15 -31.35 104.30 -97.15 0.00 0.00 -23.82 104.17 Design
LC-205 3.89 -0.69 -2.69 8.31 -9.00 0.00 0.00 -15.77 8.84 Design
LC-206 4.84 -0.65 -4.67 14.70 -15.34 0.00 0.00 -8.38 14.86 Design
LC-207 -11.95 -8.22 25.45 -85.89 77.67 0.00 0.00 4.74 85.50 Design
LC-208 17.20 7.42 -29.89 99.74 -92.32 0.00 0.00 -18.89 99.74 Design
LC-209 2.15 -0.42 -1.23 3.75 -4.17 0.00 0.00 -10.83 4.13 Design
LC-210 3.10 -0.38 -3.21 10.13 -10.51 0.00 0.00 -3.44 10.15 Design
LC-211 -23.13 0.73 43.34 -138.88 139.61 0.00 0.00 21.73 129.86 Design
LC-212 2.70 11.26 -15.20 54.46 -43.19 0.00 0.00 9.33 51.45 Design
LC-213 0.25 12.97 -1.16 10.21 2.76 0.00 0.00 5.51 7.65 Design
LC-214 -11.57 11.70 17.48 -50.30 62.00 0.00 0.00 23.81 56.51 Design
LC-215 -23.14 0.72 43.36 -138.96 139.68 0.00 0.00 21.50 129.93 Design
LC-216 2.69 11.25 -15.17 54.38 -43.12 0.00 0.00 9.10 51.37 Design
LC-217 0.24 12.96 -1.14 10.13 2.83 0.00 0.00 5.28 7.58 Design
LC-218 -11.58 11.69 17.50 -50.37 62.07 0.00 0.00 23.58 56.58 Design
376
Extended end plate

DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Beam
Web [1/16in] 5 3.00 - table J2.4
Support

DESIGN CHECK

Beam
Support
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
377
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Top web bearing [kN] 653.12 334.40 LC-8-7 0.51 Eq. J10-4
Connection NO: 5
DEMANDS
LC-1 -16.53 -25.80 -64.93 195.70 -221.50 0.00 0.00 -26.44 204.19 Design
LC-2 16.52 25.79 64.88 -195.55 221.33 0.00 0.00 26.42 204.03 Design
LC-3 -0.75 -0.47 -2.53 7.88 -8.35 0.00 0.00 -17.69 7.68 Design
LC-4 0.75 0.46 2.50 -7.80 8.26 0.00 0.00 17.75 7.59 Design
LC-5 -4.56 -3.55 -3.49 9.44 -12.98 0.00 0.00 -6.62 12.05 Design
LC-6 -0.01 -0.02 -0.03 0.08 -0.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.09 Design
LC-7 -10.13 -7.85 -7.56 20.36 -28.21 0.00 0.00 -12.69 26.20 Design
LC-8 -10.94 -15.64 -87.76 274.13 -289.77 0.00 0.00 -17.14 281.59 Design
LC-9 41.79 36.39 76.09 -226.26 262.65 0.00 0.00 54.26 251.10 Design
LC-10 13.83 31.50 18.07 -42.29 73.79 0.00 0.00 21.95 53.24 Design
LC-11 13.61 21.79 -11.20 46.86 -25.07 0.00 0.00 28.80 34.12 Design
LC-100 -6.38 -4.97 -4.88 13.21 -18.18 0.00 0.00 -9.27 16.88 Design
LC-101 -10.55 -8.21 -8.01 21.64 -29.85 0.00 0.00 -14.27 27.71 Design
LC-102 -21.69 -16.83 -16.30 43.94 -60.77 0.00 0.00 -28.25 56.43 Design
LC-103 -22.01 -30.07 -69.13 207.06 -237.13 0.00 0.00 -34.38 218.70 Design
LC-104 11.04 21.52 60.68 -184.18 205.70 0.00 0.00 18.48 189.52 Design
LC-105 -6.23 -4.74 -6.73 19.24 -23.98 0.00 0.00 -25.64 22.19 Design
LC-106 -4.73 -3.81 -1.70 3.56 -7.37 0.00 0.00 9.81 6.92 Design
LC-107 -20.63 -29.00 -68.07 204.19 -233.19 0.00 0.00 -32.40 215.03 Design
LC-108 12.41 22.59 61.74 -187.05 209.65 0.00 0.00 20.46 193.18 Design
LC-109 -4.85 -3.67 -5.67 16.37 -20.04 0.00 0.00 -23.66 18.53 Design
LC-110 -3.36 -2.74 -0.64 0.69 -3.43 0.00 0.00 11.79 3.25 Design
LC-111 -15.04 -18.84 -90.90 282.62 -301.46 0.00 0.00 -23.10 292.44 Design
LC-112 37.69 33.20 72.95 -217.77 250.96 0.00 0.00 48.30 240.25 Design
LC-113 9.72 28.31 14.93 -33.80 62.11 0.00 0.00 15.99 42.40 Design
LC-114 9.51 18.60 -14.34 55.35 -36.76 0.00 0.00 22.84 43.45 Design
LC-115 -21.48 -23.84 -95.74 295.67 -319.51 0.00 0.00 -31.42 309.20 Design
LC-116 31.25 28.20 68.11 -204.71 232.91 0.00 0.00 39.97 223.49 Design
LC-117 3.28 23.31 10.09 -20.75 44.06 0.00 0.00 7.67 25.63 Design
LC-118 3.07 13.60 -19.18 68.41 -54.81 0.00 0.00 14.51 57.79 Design
LC-200 -4.56 -3.55 -3.49 9.44 -12.98 0.00 0.00 -6.62 12.05 Design
LC-201 -14.70 -11.42 -11.08 29.88 -41.30 0.00 0.00 -19.30 38.35 Design
LC-202 -12.16 -9.45 -9.18 24.77 -34.22 0.00 0.00 -16.13 31.77 Design
LC-203 -12.35 -16.61 -37.70 112.82 -129.42 0.00 0.00 -19.23 119.37 Design
LC-204 5.49 11.25 32.40 -98.46 109.71 0.00 0.00 9.31 101.07 Design
LC-205 -3.83 -2.93 -4.00 11.39 -14.32 0.00 0.00 -14.51 13.26 Design
LC-206 -3.02 -2.43 -1.29 2.93 -5.35 0.00 0.00 4.63 5.01 Design
LC-207 -10.98 -15.53 -36.63 109.92 -125.45 0.00 0.00 -17.26 115.68 Design
LC-208 6.87 12.33 33.46 -101.35 113.68 0.00 0.00 11.29 104.75 Design
378
LC-209 -2.46 -1.85 -2.93 8.50 -10.35 0.00 0.00 -12.54 9.57 Design
LC-210 -1.65 -1.35 -0.22 0.03 -1.38 0.00 0.00 6.60 1.32 Design
LC-211 -8.34 -9.70 -42.11 130.43 -140.14 0.00 0.00 -12.68 135.76 Design
LC-212 15.39 13.72 31.62 -94.74 108.45 0.00 0.00 19.45 103.95 Design
LC-213 2.80 11.51 5.51 -11.96 23.47 0.00 0.00 4.91 14.92 Design
LC-214 2.71 7.14 -7.65 28.16 -21.02 0.00 0.00 7.99 23.13 Design
LC-215 -8.35 -9.71 -42.13 130.50 -140.21 0.00 0.00 -12.67 135.83 Design
LC-216 15.38 13.70 31.60 -94.68 108.38 0.00 0.00 19.46 103.88 Design
LC-217 2.80 11.50 5.49 -11.89 23.39 0.00 0.00 4.92 14.85 Design
LC-218 2.70 7.13 -7.68 28.23 -21.10 0.00 0.00 8.00 23.20 Design
Extended end plate

DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Beam
Web [1/16in] 5 3.00 - table J2.4
Support

DESIGN CHECK

Beam
379
Support
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Connection NO: 6
DEMANDS
kN kN kN*m kN kN
LC-1 0.00 -0.08 -1.76 4.44 -4.52 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.07 1.78 -4.49 4.56 Design
LC-3 0.00 -3.46 -69.19 174.48 -177.94 Design
LC-4 0.00 3.20 69.50 -175.38 178.59 Design
LC-5 0.00 0.19 -0.20 0.60 -0.41 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.01 0.19 -0.48 0.49 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.03 -0.08 0.22 -0.19 Design
LC-8 0.00 -0.08 0.16 -0.46 0.37 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.10 0.18 -0.52 0.42 Design
LC-10 0.00 17.48 -33.71 94.60 -77.12 Design
LC-11 0.00 -8.36 34.78 -92.76 84.40 Design
LC-100 0.00 0.27 -0.28 0.84 -0.57 Design
LC-101 0.00 0.26 0.03 0.06 0.20 Design
LC-102 0.00 0.28 -0.27 0.83 -0.55 Design
LC-103 0.00 0.16 -1.90 4.92 -4.76 Design
LC-104 0.00 0.30 1.63 -4.01 4.31 Design
LC-105 0.00 -3.23 -69.33 174.95 -178.18 Design
LC-106 0.00 3.44 69.36 -174.91 178.34 Design
LC-107 0.00 0.09 -1.94 4.98 -4.88 Design
LC-108 0.00 0.24 1.60 -3.95 4.19 Design
LC-109 0.00 -3.29 -69.37 175.01 -178.30 Design
LC-110 0.00 3.37 69.32 -174.85 178.22 Design
LC-111 0.00 0.09 -0.01 0.08 0.01 Design
LC-112 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.05 Design
LC-113 0.00 17.65 -33.89 95.13 -77.48 Design
LC-114 0.00 -8.19 34.61 -92.23 84.04 Design
LC-115 0.00 0.16 -0.02 0.13 0.03 Design
380
LC-116 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.07 0.08 Design
LC-117 0.00 17.73 -33.90 95.18 -77.46 Design
LC-118 0.00 -8.11 34.60 -92.18 84.06 Design
LC-200 0.00 0.19 -0.20 0.60 -0.41 Design
LC-201 0.00 0.23 -0.09 0.34 -0.11 Design
LC-202 0.00 0.22 -0.12 0.40 -0.19 Design
LC-203 0.00 0.11 -0.96 2.49 -2.38 Design
LC-204 0.00 0.19 0.95 -2.34 2.52 Design
LC-205 0.00 -1.72 -37.37 94.30 -96.02 Design
LC-206 0.00 1.88 37.52 -94.62 96.50 Design
LC-207 0.00 0.04 -1.04 2.67 -2.62 Design
LC-208 0.00 0.12 0.87 -2.16 2.28 Design
LC-209 0.00 -1.78 -37.45 94.49 -96.27 Design
LC-210 0.00 1.82 37.44 -94.44 96.25 Design
LC-211 0.00 0.11 -0.07 0.24 -0.14 Design
LC-212 0.00 0.10 -0.07 0.22 -0.12 Design
LC-213 0.00 8.01 -15.32 43.02 -35.01 Design
LC-214 0.00 -3.62 15.51 -41.30 37.68 Design
LC-215 0.00 0.11 0.07 -0.12 0.23 Design
LC-216 0.00 0.10 0.08 -0.14 0.25 Design
LC-217 0.00 8.02 -15.18 42.66 -34.64 Design
LC-218 0.00 -3.61 15.65 -41.66 38.04 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
DESIGN CHECK

381
Beam
REFERENCES
Connection NO: 7
DEMANDS
LC-1 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 1.99 0.02 Design
LC-2 0.00 -0.05 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 0.00 0.00 -1.99 0.02 Design
LC-3 0.00 -12.63 0.00 -6.31 -6.31 0.00 0.00 0.60 6.28 Design
LC-4 0.00 12.64 0.00 6.32 6.32 0.00 0.00 -0.59 6.29 Design
LC-5 0.00 -0.10 0.00 -0.05 -0.05 0.00 0.00 -13.32 0.04 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.14 0.00 -0.07 -0.07 0.00 0.00 -27.20 0.06 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 53.30 0.13 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 32.42 0.08 Design
LC-10 0.00 -15.30 0.00 -7.65 -7.65 0.00 0.00 19.75 7.86 Design
LC-11 0.00 25.10 0.00 12.55 12.55 0.00 0.00 19.93 12.66 Design
LC-100 0.00 -0.14 0.00 -0.07 -0.07 0.00 0.00 -18.65 0.06 Design
LC-101 0.00 -0.19 0.00 -0.10 -0.10 0.00 0.00 -29.59 0.08 Design
LC-102 0.00 -0.35 0.00 -0.17 -0.17 0.00 0.00 -59.52 0.15 Design
LC-103 0.00 -0.07 0.00 -0.04 -0.04 0.00 0.00 -14.00 0.03 Design
LC-104 0.00 -0.17 0.00 -0.09 -0.09 0.00 0.00 -17.98 0.08 Design
LC-105 0.00 -12.75 0.00 -6.37 -6.37 0.00 0.00 -15.39 6.34 Design
LC-106 0.00 12.53 0.00 6.26 6.26 0.00 0.00 -16.58 6.24 Design
LC-107 0.00 -0.04 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 0.00 0.00 -10.00 0.02 Design
LC-108 0.00 -0.14 0.00 -0.07 -0.07 0.00 0.00 -13.98 0.06 Design
LC-109 0.00 -12.72 0.00 -6.36 -6.36 0.00 0.00 -11.40 6.32 Design
LC-110 0.00 12.56 0.00 6.28 6.28 0.00 0.00 -12.58 6.25 Design
LC-111 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 41.31 0.09 Design
LC-112 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.00 20.43 0.04 Design
LC-113 0.00 -15.39 0.00 -7.69 -7.69 0.00 0.00 7.76 7.81 Design
LC-114 0.00 25.01 0.00 12.51 12.51 0.00 0.00 7.94 12.71 Design
LC-115 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 23.71 0.04 Design
LC-116 0.00 -0.01 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.00 2.83 0.01 Design
LC-117 0.00 -15.49 0.00 -7.74 -7.74 0.00 0.00 -9.84 7.75 Design
LC-118 0.00 24.91 0.00 12.46 12.46 0.00 0.00 -9.66 12.76 Design
LC-200 0.00 -0.10 0.00 -0.05 -0.05 0.00 0.00 -13.32 0.04 Design
LC-201 0.00 -0.24 0.00 -0.12 -0.12 0.00 0.00 -40.53 0.11 Design
LC-202 0.00 -0.21 0.00 -0.10 -0.10 0.00 0.00 -33.73 0.09 Design
LC-203 0.00 -0.05 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 0.00 0.00 -8.92 0.02 Design
LC-204 0.00 -0.10 0.00 -0.05 -0.05 0.00 0.00 -11.07 0.05 Design
LC-205 0.00 -6.89 0.00 -3.45 -3.45 0.00 0.00 -9.67 3.43 Design
LC-206 0.00 6.75 0.00 3.38 3.38 0.00 0.00 -10.31 3.36 Design
382
LC-207 0.00 -0.02 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 0.00 -4.92 0.01 Design
LC-208 0.00 -0.07 0.00 -0.04 -0.04 0.00 0.00 -7.07 0.03 Design
LC-209 0.00 -6.86 0.00 -3.43 -3.43 0.00 0.00 -5.67 3.41 Design
LC-210 0.00 6.78 0.00 3.39 3.39 0.00 0.00 -6.31 3.38 Design
LC-211 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 13.99 0.02 Design
LC-212 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.60 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.00 -6.96 0.00 -3.48 -3.48 0.00 0.00 -1.10 3.49 Design
LC-214 0.00 11.22 0.00 5.61 5.61 0.00 0.00 -1.02 5.74 Design
LC-215 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 13.99 0.02 Design
LC-216 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.59 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.00 -6.96 0.00 -3.48 -3.48 0.00 0.00 -1.10 3.49 Design
LC-218 0.00 11.22 0.00 5.61 5.61 0.00 0.00 -1.03 5.74 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
Thickness [mm] 16.00 5.07 - p. 9-5
DESIGN CHECK

Beam
Support
383
Top local flange bending [kN] 248.27 12.55 LC-11-10 0.05 Eq. J10-1
Bottom local flange bending [kN] 496.55 12.55 LC-11-10 0.03 Eq. J10-1
Local web yielding [kN] 302.15 12.55 LC-11-10 0.04 Eq. J10-3
Connection NO: 8
DEMANDS
LC-1 0.00 0.46 -1.16 4.08 -3.62 0.00 0.00 -1.21 3.98 Design
LC-2 0.00 -0.49 1.22 -4.32 3.84 0.00 0.00 1.23 4.22 Design
LC-3 0.00 -2.64 -70.70 234.16 -236.80 0.00 0.00 -24.20 222.10 Design
LC-4 0.00 2.56 70.89 -234.84 237.41 0.00 0.00 24.26 222.73 Design
LC-5 0.00 -2.11 -17.11 55.92 -58.03 0.00 0.00 -47.41 54.78 Design
LC-6 0.00 -0.97 -8.13 26.59 -27.56 0.00 0.00 -14.59 26.03 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.01 0.15 -0.51 0.50 0.00 0.00 -27.17 0.49 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.02 -0.31 1.06 -1.04 0.00 0.00 54.10 1.03 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.01 -0.12 0.41 -0.42 0.00 0.00 32.01 0.40 Design
LC-10 0.00 19.29 -34.97 126.14 -106.85 0.00 0.00 7.67 121.90 Design
LC-11 0.00 -16.58 33.30 -119.20 102.62 0.00 0.00 31.78 115.54 Design
LC-100 0.00 -2.96 -23.95 78.28 -81.24 0.00 0.00 -66.38 76.69 Design
LC-101 0.00 -4.08 -33.46 109.39 -113.48 0.00 0.00 -93.82 107.14 Design
LC-102 0.00 -3.03 -24.35 79.59 -82.62 0.00 0.00 -107.66 77.97 Design
LC-103 0.00 -2.56 -25.75 84.48 -87.04 0.00 0.00 -65.40 82.47 Design
LC-104 0.00 -3.50 -23.37 76.07 -79.58 0.00 0.00 -62.96 74.80 Design
LC-105 0.00 -5.66 -95.29 314.55 -320.21 0.00 0.00 -88.39 300.85 Design
LC-106 0.00 -0.45 46.30 -154.45 153.99 0.00 0.00 -39.93 144.43 Design
LC-107 0.00 -1.44 -16.55 54.41 -55.85 0.00 0.00 -43.88 53.02 Design
LC-108 0.00 -2.39 -14.17 46.00 -48.39 0.00 0.00 -41.44 45.35 Design
LC-109 0.00 -4.54 -86.09 284.48 -289.03 0.00 0.00 -66.87 271.40 Design
LC-110 0.00 0.66 55.50 -184.52 185.18 0.00 0.00 -18.41 173.43 Design
LC-111 0.00 -1.88 -15.71 51.38 -53.27 0.00 0.00 11.42 50.31 Design
LC-112 0.00 -1.92 -15.52 50.73 -52.65 0.00 0.00 -10.66 49.70 Design
LC-113 0.00 17.39 -50.37 176.46 -159.07 0.00 0.00 -35.00 175.15 Design
LC-114 0.00 -18.49 17.90 -68.87 50.39 0.00 0.00 -10.89 62.28 Design
LC-115 0.00 -3.00 -24.83 81.20 -84.20 0.00 0.00 -23.68 79.52 Design
LC-116 0.00 -3.04 -24.64 80.55 -83.59 0.00 0.00 -45.76 78.90 Design
LC-117 0.00 16.27 -59.49 206.28 -190.01 0.00 0.00 -70.10 205.86 Design
LC-118 0.00 -19.61 8.78 -39.06 19.45 0.00 0.00 -45.99 30.73 Design
LC-200 0.00 -2.11 -17.11 55.92 -58.03 0.00 0.00 -47.41 54.78 Design
LC-201 0.00 -3.09 -25.08 82.00 -85.09 0.00 0.00 -89.17 80.32 Design
LC-202 0.00 -2.84 -23.09 75.48 -78.32 0.00 0.00 -78.73 73.94 Design
LC-203 0.00 -2.06 -19.55 64.08 -66.15 0.00 0.00 -47.15 62.62 Design
LC-204 0.00 -2.57 -18.26 59.55 -62.12 0.00 0.00 -45.84 58.48 Design
LC-205 0.00 -3.74 -57.10 188.33 -192.06 0.00 0.00 -59.57 180.54 Design
LC-206 0.00 -0.92 19.36 -64.93 64.01 0.00 0.00 -33.40 60.59 Design
LC-207 0.00 -0.70 -8.32 27.37 -28.07 0.00 0.00 -21.99 26.66 Design
LC-208 0.00 -1.21 -7.04 22.83 -24.04 0.00 0.00 -20.67 22.52 Design
LC-209 0.00 -2.38 -45.87 151.61 -153.98 0.00 0.00 -34.40 144.58 Design
LC-210 0.00 0.43 30.58 -101.65 102.09 0.00 0.00 -8.23 95.62 Design
LC-211 0.00 -1.58 -12.97 42.41 -43.99 0.00 0.00 -11.22 41.54 Design
LC-212 0.00 -1.59 -12.88 42.12 -43.71 0.00 0.00 -21.15 41.26 Design
384
LC-213 0.00 7.10 -28.57 98.70 -91.60 0.00 0.00 -32.11 98.17 Design
LC-214 0.00 -9.05 2.16 -11.70 2.65 0.00 0.00 -21.26 7.61 Design
LC-215 0.00 -2.30 -19.07 62.36 -64.66 0.00 0.00 -22.16 61.06 Design
LC-216 0.00 -2.32 -18.98 62.06 -64.38 0.00 0.00 -32.09 60.79 Design
LC-217 0.00 6.37 -34.66 118.64 -112.27 0.00 0.00 -43.05 116.97 Design
LC-218 0.00 -9.77 -3.94 8.24 -18.01 0.00 0.00 -32.20 12.78 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
Thickness [mm] 16.00 5.07 - p. 9-5
DESIGN CHECK

Bolt bearing (Top plate) [kN] 1335.13 304.67 LC-105-16 0.23 Eq. J3-6
Bolt bearing (Bottom plate) [kN] 1335.13 310.33 LC-105-16 0.23 Eq. J3-6
Beam
Top flange bolt bearing under shear load [kN] 978.57 320.21 LC-105-16 0.33 Eq. J3-6
Bottom flange bolt bearing under shear load [kN] 978.57 320.21 LC-105-16 0.33 Eq. J3-6
Support
385
Current Date: 4/17/2022 3:12:03 AM

Units System: kN_m
Summary Table
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 BCF - N(73) - M (128,66) 0.887 OK
2 BCW - N(74) - (M 70,66) 0.288 OK
3 BCW - N(75) - (M 68,123) 0.237 OK
4 BCF - N(71) - M (63,69) 0.955 OK
5 BCF - N(69) - M (61,69) 0.331 OK
6 BCW - N(90) - (M 65,135) 0.363 OK
7 BCF - N(123) - (M 220,214) 0.155 OK
8 BCF - N(75) - M (68,188) 0.607 OK
9 CBB - N(94) - M (37,136,137,162) 0.388 OK
10 CVR - N(128) - (M 120,234,235) 0.417 OK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connection NO: 1
DEMANDS
LC-1 -6.83 0.70 29.00 -82.02 82.72 0.00 0.00 6.83 78.81 Design
LC-2 6.83 -0.70 -29.00 82.01 -82.71 0.00 0.00 -6.83 78.79 Design
LC-3 -0.06 0.04 0.28 -0.77 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.77 Design
LC-4 0.06 -0.04 -0.27 0.75 -0.79 0.00 0.00 -0.06 0.75 Design
LC-5 5.35 -0.41 -2.78 7.69 -8.10 0.00 0.00 -6.00 7.69 Design
LC-6 0.04 -0.02 -0.12 0.32 -0.34 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.32 Design
LC-7 11.72 -0.83 -5.59 15.47 -16.30 0.00 0.00 -11.72 15.47 Design
LC-8 -34.61 -8.04 51.89 -151.41 143.37 0.00 0.00 34.61 143.37 Design
LC-9 -26.41 27.75 2.30 7.33 20.42 0.00 0.00 26.41 7.33 Design
LC-10 -43.21 33.58 35.56 -84.21 117.79 0.00 0.00 43.21 84.21 Design
LC-11 -35.26 35.23 46.70 -115.03 150.26 0.00 0.00 35.26 115.03 Design
LC-100 7.49 -0.58 -3.89 10.77 -11.34 0.00 0.00 -8.40 10.77 Design
LC-101 12.35 -0.94 -6.32 17.47 -18.41 0.00 0.00 -13.13 17.47 Design
LC-102 25.19 -1.83 -12.34 34.14 -35.97 0.00 0.00 -25.97 34.14 Design
LC-103 -0.39 0.20 25.61 -72.64 72.83 0.00 0.00 -0.39 69.42 Design
LC-104 13.27 -1.20 -32.39 91.40 -92.60 0.00 0.00 -14.06 88.18 Design
LC-105 6.39 -0.46 -3.12 8.62 -9.08 0.00 0.00 -7.17 8.62 Design
LC-106 6.50 -0.54 -3.67 10.14 -10.69 0.00 0.00 -7.28 10.14 Design
386
LC-107 -2.02 0.33 26.50 -75.10 75.43 0.00 0.00 1.43 71.89 Design
LC-108 11.65 -1.07 -31.50 88.93 -90.00 0.00 0.00 -12.23 85.71 Design
LC-109 4.76 -0.33 -2.23 6.16 -6.48 0.00 0.00 -5.34 6.16 Design
LC-110 4.87 -0.41 -2.77 7.68 -8.09 0.00 0.00 -5.46 7.68 Design
LC-111 -29.79 -8.41 49.39 -144.49 136.08 0.00 0.00 29.21 136.08 Design
LC-112 -21.59 27.38 -0.20 14.25 13.13 0.00 0.00 21.01 13.13 Design
LC-113 -38.40 33.21 33.06 -77.29 110.50 0.00 0.00 37.81 77.29 Design
LC-114 -30.45 34.86 44.20 -108.11 142.97 0.00 0.00 29.86 108.11 Design
LC-115 -22.31 -8.96 45.70 -134.29 125.33 0.00 0.00 21.53 125.33 Design
LC-116 -14.11 26.83 -3.89 24.45 2.38 0.00 0.00 13.33 2.38 Design
LC-117 -30.91 32.67 29.37 -67.09 99.75 0.00 0.00 30.13 67.09 Design
LC-118 -22.96 34.32 40.51 -97.91 132.22 0.00 0.00 22.18 97.91 Design
LC-200 5.35 -0.41 -2.78 7.69 -8.10 0.00 0.00 -6.00 7.69 Design
LC-201 17.11 -1.26 -8.49 23.48 -24.73 0.00 0.00 -17.77 23.48 Design
LC-202 14.17 -1.05 -7.06 19.53 -20.58 0.00 0.00 -14.83 19.53 Design
LC-203 0.36 0.06 13.49 -38.29 38.34 0.00 0.00 -0.85 36.55 Design
LC-204 7.74 -0.70 -17.83 50.29 -50.99 0.00 0.00 -8.22 48.55 Design
LC-205 4.02 -0.30 -2.02 5.59 -5.89 0.00 0.00 -4.50 5.59 Design
LC-206 4.08 -0.34 -2.32 6.41 -6.76 0.00 0.00 -4.57 6.41 Design
LC-207 -1.28 0.19 14.41 -40.83 41.02 0.00 0.00 0.99 39.10 Design
LC-208 6.10 -0.56 -16.91 47.74 -48.31 0.00 0.00 -6.39 46.01 Design
LC-209 2.38 -0.16 -1.10 3.05 -3.21 0.00 0.00 -2.67 3.05 Design
LC-210 2.44 -0.21 -1.40 3.87 -4.08 0.00 0.00 -2.73 3.87 Design
LC-211 -11.56 -3.93 21.27 -62.37 58.44 0.00 0.00 11.07 58.44 Design
LC-212 -7.87 12.18 -1.05 9.07 3.11 0.00 0.00 7.38 3.11 Design
LC-213 -15.43 14.80 13.92 -32.13 46.93 0.00 0.00 14.94 32.13 Design
LC-214 -11.85 15.55 18.93 -45.99 61.54 0.00 0.00 11.37 45.99 Design
LC-215 -11.53 -3.94 21.18 -62.13 58.19 0.00 0.00 11.04 58.19 Design
LC-216 -7.84 12.16 -1.13 9.30 2.86 0.00 0.00 7.35 2.86 Design
LC-217 -15.40 14.79 13.83 -31.89 46.68 0.00 0.00 14.91 31.89 Design
LC-218 -11.82 15.53 18.84 -45.76 61.29 0.00 0.00 11.33 45.76 Design
Extended end plate

DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Beam
Web [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Support

Thin plate behavior controlled by bolt rupture with prying action
DESIGN CHECK
387
Beam
Support
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Connection NO: 2
DEMANDS
kN kN kN*m kN kN
LC-1 0.60 2.32 -4.25 13.23 -10.91 Design

LC-2 -0.60 -2.32 4.25 -13.22 10.90 Design
LC-3 0.01 0.05 0.04 -0.08 0.14 Design
LC-4 -0.01 -0.05 -0.04 0.09 -0.14 Design
LC-5 0.29 1.13 -5.47 16.10 -14.97 Design
LC-6 -0.01 -0.03 0.08 -0.25 0.23 Design
LC-7 0.69 2.66 -12.66 37.29 -34.62 Design
LC-8 0.23 0.90 23.05 -65.03 65.93 Design
LC-9 8.43 32.42 23.63 -50.89 83.32 Design
388
LC-10 10.92 41.98 17.83 -29.65 71.63 Design
LC-11 10.81 41.59 13.88 -18.63 60.22 Design
LC-100 0.41 1.58 -7.66 22.54 -20.96 Design
LC-101 0.69 2.64 -12.76 37.56 -34.92 Design
LC-102 1.46 5.60 -26.78 78.85 -73.25 Design
LC-103 0.95 3.66 -10.77 32.42 -28.76 Design
LC-104 -0.25 -0.98 -2.27 5.97 -6.95 Design
LC-105 0.36 1.39 -6.48 19.11 -17.72 Design
LC-106 0.33 1.29 -6.56 19.28 -17.99 Design
LC-107 0.87 3.33 -9.17 27.72 -24.38 Design
LC-108 -0.34 -1.30 -0.68 1.27 -2.57 Design
LC-109 0.28 1.07 -4.88 14.41 -13.34 Design
LC-110 0.25 0.96 -4.96 14.58 -13.62 Design
LC-111 0.50 1.91 18.13 -50.54 52.46 Design
LC-112 8.69 33.44 18.70 -36.40 69.84 Design
LC-113 11.18 43.00 12.91 -15.16 58.16 Design
LC-114 11.08 42.61 8.96 -4.14 46.75 Design
LC-115 0.93 3.57 10.20 -27.20 30.77 Design
LC-116 9.12 35.09 10.77 -13.06 48.15 Design
LC-117 11.61 44.65 4.98 8.19 36.47 Design
LC-118 11.51 44.26 1.03 19.21 25.05 Design
LC-200 0.29 1.13 -5.47 16.10 -14.97 Design
LC-201 0.98 3.76 -18.04 53.13 -49.37 Design
LC-202 0.81 3.10 -14.90 43.87 -40.77 Design
LC-203 0.54 2.08 -6.33 19.03 -16.95 Design
LC-204 -0.11 -0.43 -1.75 4.74 -5.17 Design
LC-205 0.22 0.85 -4.02 11.84 -10.99 Design
LC-206 0.21 0.80 -4.06 11.93 -11.13 Design
LC-207 0.46 1.76 -4.76 14.39 -12.63 Design
LC-208 -0.19 -0.74 -0.17 0.11 -0.85 Design
LC-209 0.14 0.54 -2.44 7.20 -6.66 Design
LC-210 0.12 0.48 -2.48 7.29 -6.81 Design
LC-211 0.32 1.25 6.27 -17.19 18.44 Design
LC-212 4.01 15.44 6.53 -10.83 26.26 Design
LC-213 5.13 19.74 3.92 -1.27 21.00 Design
LC-214 5.09 19.56 2.14 3.69 15.87 Design
LC-215 0.32 1.23 6.34 -17.38 18.61 Design
LC-216 4.01 15.42 6.59 -11.02 26.43 Design
LC-217 5.13 19.72 3.98 -1.46 21.17 Design
LC-218 5.08 19.54 2.21 3.50 16.04 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
DESIGN CHECK
389
Beam
REFERENCES
Connection NO: 3
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 -7.41 -2.27 4.70 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 7.41 2.29 -4.70 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 -0.09 -9.50 0.09 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 0.09 9.63 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-5 15.66 -0.06 -46.50 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-6 7.50 0.01 -14.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.17 -27.73 -0.21 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 2.63 54.61 7.61 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.01 32.20 -2.32 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 2.20 14.01 2.64 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 1.87 22.63 4.12 0.00 Design
LC-100 21.92 -0.09 -65.11 -0.12 0.00 Design
LC-101 30.79 -0.15 -92.85 -0.20 0.00 Design
LC-102 22.54 -0.35 -107.41 -0.44 0.00 Design
LC-103 22.54 -7.48 -65.32 4.60 0.00 Design
LC-104 22.54 7.33 -60.76 -4.80 0.00 Design
LC-105 22.54 -0.16 -72.55 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-106 22.54 0.01 -53.42 -0.19 0.00 Design
LC-107 14.09 -7.47 -44.12 4.62 0.00 Design
LC-108 14.09 7.35 -39.56 -4.77 0.00 Design
390
LC-109 14.09 -0.14 -51.36 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-110 14.09 0.03 -32.22 -0.17 0.00 Design
LC-111 14.09 2.57 12.76 7.54 0.00 Design
LC-112 14.09 -0.05 -9.66 -2.40 0.00 Design
LC-113 14.09 2.14 -27.85 2.57 0.00 Design
LC-114 14.09 1.81 -19.23 4.04 0.00 Design
LC-115 22.54 2.47 -22.30 7.41 0.00 Design
LC-116 22.54 -0.15 -44.72 -2.53 0.00 Design
LC-117 22.54 2.04 -62.91 2.44 0.00 Design
LC-118 22.54 1.71 -54.29 3.91 0.00 Design
LC-200 15.66 -0.06 -46.50 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-201 23.16 -0.23 -88.72 -0.29 0.00 Design
LC-202 21.28 -0.19 -78.17 -0.24 0.00 Design
LC-203 17.37 -4.04 -46.97 2.47 0.00 Design
LC-204 17.37 3.96 -44.51 -2.60 0.00 Design
LC-205 17.37 -0.09 -50.88 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-206 17.37 0.00 -40.54 -0.11 0.00 Design
LC-207 7.05 -4.03 -22.15 2.50 0.00 Design
LC-208 7.05 3.97 -19.69 -2.58 0.00 Design
LC-209 7.05 -0.08 -26.06 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-210 7.05 0.02 -15.73 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-211 11.74 1.14 -10.30 3.36 0.00 Design
LC-212 11.74 -0.04 -20.39 -1.11 0.00 Design
LC-213 11.74 0.94 -28.58 1.13 0.00 Design
LC-214 11.74 0.79 -24.70 1.79 0.00 Design
LC-215 17.37 1.14 -21.17 3.36 0.00 Design
LC-216 17.37 -0.04 -31.26 -1.11 0.00 Design
LC-217 17.37 0.95 -39.44 1.13 0.00 Design
LC-218 17.37 0.80 -35.56 1.79 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 138.43 276.86 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
391
Support
NOTES
Connection NO: 4
DEMANDS
LC-1 -24.74 -13.58 47.15 -158.28 144.70 0.00 0.00 19.86 156.61 Design
LC-2 24.73 13.57 -47.15 158.25 -144.68 0.00 0.00 -19.86 156.59 Design
LC-3 -0.28 -0.19 0.46 -1.56 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.35 Design
LC-4 0.28 0.19 -0.45 1.54 -1.36 0.00 0.00 -0.25 1.34 Design
LC-5 5.88 -0.82 -4.67 14.61 -15.43 0.00 0.00 -13.73 14.99 Design
LC-6 -0.03 -0.01 0.06 -0.21 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.20 Design
LC-7 13.31 -1.75 -10.81 33.85 -35.60 0.00 0.00 -25.47 34.58 Design
LC-8 -60.48 3.83 104.49 -333.78 337.61 0.00 0.00 73.04 315.00 Design
LC-9 -4.50 25.35 -27.87 102.23 -76.87 0.00 0.00 47.74 96.16 Design
LC-10 -8.96 30.00 3.91 2.42 27.57 0.00 0.00 41.47 20.91 Design
LC-11 -35.24 27.60 45.44 -132.18 159.78 0.00 0.00 75.73 146.89 Design
LC-100 8.23 -1.15 -6.54 20.45 -21.60 0.00 0.00 -19.22 20.98 Design
LC-101 13.67 -1.88 -10.91 34.12 -36.00 0.00 0.00 -29.19 34.97 Design
LC-102 28.35 -3.79 -22.87 71.58 -75.37 0.00 0.00 -57.22 73.21 Design
LC-103 -17.69 -14.57 41.58 -140.86 126.29 0.00 0.00 3.40 138.66 Design
LC-104 31.78 12.58 -52.72 175.67 -163.09 0.00 0.00 -36.32 174.54 Design
LC-105 6.76 -1.18 -5.12 15.87 -17.04 0.00 0.00 -16.21 16.31 Design
LC-106 7.32 -0.81 -6.03 18.96 -19.77 0.00 0.00 -16.71 19.45 Design
LC-107 -19.44 -14.31 42.95 -145.13 130.82 0.00 0.00 7.51 143.07 Design
LC-108 30.02 12.83 -51.35 171.40 -158.56 0.00 0.00 -32.21 170.13 Design
LC-109 5.01 -0.93 -3.75 11.59 -12.51 0.00 0.00 -12.10 11.91 Design
LC-110 5.57 -0.55 -4.66 14.69 -15.24 0.00 0.00 -12.60 15.05 Design
LC-111 -55.18 3.09 100.28 -320.63 323.73 0.00 0.00 60.69 301.51 Design
LC-112 0.80 24.62 -32.08 115.37 -90.76 0.00 0.00 35.39 108.91 Design
LC-113 -3.67 29.26 -0.29 15.57 13.69 0.00 0.00 29.12 9.30 Design
LC-114 -29.95 26.86 41.23 -119.04 145.90 0.00 0.00 63.38 133.40 Design
LC-115 -46.78 1.97 93.51 -299.43 301.40 0.00 0.00 43.84 279.82 Design
LC-116 9.20 23.49 -38.85 136.58 -113.09 0.00 0.00 18.54 129.47 Design
LC-117 4.74 28.13 -7.07 36.77 -8.64 0.00 0.00 12.27 31.14 Design
LC-118 -21.54 25.73 34.46 -97.83 123.57 0.00 0.00 46.53 111.71 Design
LC-200 5.88 -0.82 -4.67 14.61 -15.43 0.00 0.00 -13.73 14.99 Design
LC-201 19.17 -2.58 -15.42 48.25 -50.83 0.00 0.00 -39.19 49.37 Design
LC-202 15.85 -2.14 -12.73 39.84 -41.98 0.00 0.00 -32.82 40.78 Design
LC-203 -8.97 -7.96 22.00 -74.67 66.72 0.00 0.00 0.44 73.45 Design
LC-204 17.75 6.70 -28.92 96.25 -89.55 0.00 0.00 -21.01 95.68 Design
LC-205 4.24 -0.73 -3.21 9.96 -10.68 0.00 0.00 -10.15 10.25 Design
LC-206 4.54 -0.53 -3.70 11.63 -12.16 0.00 0.00 -10.42 11.94 Design
LC-207 -10.71 -7.70 23.36 -78.90 71.20 0.00 0.00 4.55 77.80 Design
392
LC-208 16.00 6.96 -27.56 92.03 -85.07 0.00 0.00 -16.90 91.33 Design
LC-209 2.49 -0.47 -1.86 5.73 -6.20 0.00 0.00 -6.04 5.89 Design
LC-210 2.80 -0.27 -2.35 7.41 -7.67 0.00 0.00 -6.31 7.59 Design
LC-211 -22.80 1.11 43.51 -139.25 140.35 0.00 0.00 22.57 130.51 Design
LC-212 2.39 10.79 -16.05 56.96 -46.16 0.00 0.00 11.19 53.90 Design
LC-213 0.38 12.88 -1.74 12.05 0.84 0.00 0.00 8.37 9.38 Design
LC-214 -11.45 11.80 16.94 -48.53 60.33 0.00 0.00 23.78 54.86 Design
LC-215 -22.82 1.10 43.56 -139.40 140.50 0.00 0.00 22.58 130.65 Design
LC-216 2.37 10.78 -16.00 56.80 -46.02 0.00 0.00 11.20 53.75 Design
LC-217 0.36 12.87 -1.70 11.89 0.99 0.00 0.00 8.38 9.21 Design
LC-218 -11.47 11.79 16.99 -48.68 60.48 0.00 0.00 23.79 55.00 Design
Extended end plate

DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Outer bolt distance (internal flange) [mm] 38.10 31.75 - DG4 Sec. 2.1
Beam
Web [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Support

DESIGN CHECK

393
Shear rupture [kN] 526.07 168.81 LC-8-7 0.32 DG4 Eq 3.14, AISC 358
Eq. 6.9-12, DG4 Eq. 3.13
Beam
Support
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Connection NO: 5
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 -14.99 -23.90 -24.74 0.00 58.88 Design

LC-2 14.99 23.90 24.73 0.00 -58.87 Design
LC-3 -0.15 -0.30 -0.28 0.00 0.70 Design
LC-4 0.15 0.30 0.28 0.00 -0.70 Design
LC-5 -4.55 -3.48 -6.32 0.00 3.08 Design
LC-6 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 0.00 0.05 Design
LC-7 -10.08 -7.62 -12.52 0.00 6.55 Design
LC-8 -10.73 -14.68 -16.53 0.00 85.58 Design
LC-9 41.67 35.02 53.45 0.00 -71.34 Design
LC-10 14.17 31.35 27.64 0.00 -17.81 Design
LC-11 13.73 22.00 22.71 0.00 11.99 Design
LC-100 -6.37 -4.87 -8.85 0.00 4.31 Design
LC-101 -10.53 -8.03 -13.89 0.00 7.05 Design
LC-102 -21.60 -16.38 -27.63 0.00 14.20 Design
LC-103 -20.46 -28.09 -32.33 0.00 62.60 Design
LC-104 9.52 19.71 17.13 0.00 -55.15 Design
LC-105 -5.62 -4.49 -7.88 0.00 4.42 Design
LC-106 -5.32 -3.89 -7.32 0.00 3.02 Design
LC-107 -19.09 -27.03 -30.42 0.00 61.65 Design
LC-108 10.89 20.77 19.04 0.00 -56.10 Design
LC-109 -4.25 -3.43 -5.97 0.00 3.47 Design
LC-110 -3.94 -2.83 -5.41 0.00 2.07 Design
LC-111 -14.83 -17.81 -22.22 0.00 88.35 Design
LC-112 37.58 31.89 47.76 0.00 -68.58 Design
394
LC-113 10.07 28.22 21.95 0.00 -15.04 Design
LC-114 9.63 18.87 17.02 0.00 14.76 Design
LC-115 -21.25 -22.68 -30.38 0.00 92.57 Design
LC-116 31.16 27.02 39.60 0.00 -64.35 Design
LC-117 3.65 23.35 13.78 0.00 -10.82 Design
LC-118 3.22 14.01 8.85 0.00 18.99 Design
LC-200 -4.55 -3.48 -6.32 0.00 3.08 Design
LC-201 -14.65 -11.13 -18.87 0.00 9.68 Design
LC-202 -12.13 -9.21 -15.73 0.00 8.03 Design
LC-203 -11.52 -15.54 -18.12 0.00 34.14 Design
LC-204 4.67 10.28 8.59 0.00 -29.44 Design
LC-205 -3.51 -2.79 -4.91 0.00 2.73 Design
LC-206 -3.34 -2.47 -4.61 0.00 1.97 Design
LC-207 -10.14 -14.47 -16.20 0.00 33.18 Design
LC-208 6.05 11.34 10.51 0.00 -30.40 Design
LC-209 -2.13 -1.73 -3.00 0.00 1.76 Design
LC-210 -1.97 -1.40 -2.69 0.00 1.01 Design
LC-211 -8.24 -9.22 -12.18 0.00 40.82 Design
LC-212 15.34 13.15 19.31 0.00 -29.80 Design
LC-213 2.96 11.50 7.70 0.00 -5.71 Design
LC-214 2.76 7.29 5.48 0.00 7.71 Design
LC-215 -8.26 -9.24 -12.20 0.00 40.86 Design
LC-216 15.33 13.13 19.29 0.00 -29.76 Design
LC-217 2.95 11.48 7.68 0.00 -5.67 Design
LC-218 2.75 7.27 5.46 0.00 7.75 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 137.41 274.83 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Web crippling [kN] 249.52 28.09 LC-103-14 0.11 Eq. J10-5b
Beam
395
Support
NOTES
Connection NO: 6
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 0.00 6.83 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.00 -6.83 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 1.21 0.06 0.02 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 -1.27 -0.06 0.09 0.00 Design
LC-5 -0.65 0.00 -8.76 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -11.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.00 34.61 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.01 26.41 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 26.16 43.21 -8.49 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 -16.09 35.26 5.23 0.00 Design
LC-100 -0.91 -0.01 -12.27 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-101 -0.78 -0.01 -16.45 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-102 -0.78 -0.01 -29.29 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-103 -0.78 -0.01 -3.71 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-104 -0.78 -0.01 -17.37 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-105 -0.78 1.20 -10.48 0.03 0.00 Design
LC-106 -0.78 -1.28 -10.59 0.10 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.59 0.00 -1.05 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-108 -0.59 -0.01 -14.72 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-109 -0.59 1.20 -7.83 0.03 0.00 Design
LC-110 -0.59 -1.28 -7.94 0.09 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.59 -0.01 26.72 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-112 -0.59 -0.01 18.52 0.02 0.00 Design
LC-113 -0.59 26.15 35.33 -8.48 0.00 Design
LC-114 -0.59 -16.10 27.38 5.24 0.00 Design
LC-115 -0.78 -0.01 18.21 0.02 0.00 Design
LC-116 -0.78 -0.02 10.01 0.03 0.00 Design
LC-117 -0.78 26.15 26.82 -8.48 0.00 Design
LC-118 -0.78 -16.10 18.87 5.24 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.65 0.00 -8.76 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-201 -0.65 -0.01 -20.52 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-202 -0.65 -0.01 -17.58 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.49 0.00 -2.92 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-204 -0.49 0.00 -10.29 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-205 -0.49 0.65 -6.57 0.02 0.00 Design
LC-206 -0.49 -0.69 -6.64 0.05 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.29 0.00 -0.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 -0.29 0.00 -7.63 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-209 -0.29 0.65 -3.91 0.02 0.00 Design
LC-210 -0.29 -0.69 -3.97 0.05 0.00 Design
396
LC-211 -0.49 -0.01 9.00 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.49 -0.01 5.31 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-213 -0.49 11.77 12.87 -3.81 0.00 Design
LC-214 -0.49 -7.25 9.30 2.36 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.49 -0.01 8.97 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.49 -0.01 5.28 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-217 -0.49 11.77 12.84 -3.81 0.00 Design
LC-218 -0.49 -7.25 9.26 2.36 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
Support
NOTES
397
Connection NO: 7
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 0.01 1.48 0.00 0.02 Design

LC-2 0.00 -0.01 -1.48 0.00 -0.02 Design
LC-3 0.00 -11.98 0.00 0.00 0.35 Design
LC-4 0.00 11.99 0.00 0.00 -0.34 Design
LC-5 0.65 0.00 -13.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -27.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.00 53.79 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.00 32.23 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 -15.23 18.04 0.00 0.42 Design
LC-11 0.00 24.81 18.15 0.00 -0.61 Design
LC-100 0.91 0.00 -18.27 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.78 0.00 -29.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.78 0.00 -60.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.78 0.01 -14.18 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-104 0.78 -0.02 -17.14 0.00 -0.02 Design
LC-105 0.78 -11.98 -15.66 0.00 0.35 Design
LC-106 0.78 11.98 -15.66 0.00 -0.35 Design
LC-107 0.59 0.01 -10.26 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-108 0.59 -0.01 -13.23 0.00 -0.02 Design
LC-109 0.59 -11.98 -11.74 0.00 0.35 Design
LC-110 0.59 11.98 -11.75 0.00 -0.35 Design
LC-111 0.59 0.00 42.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.59 0.00 20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 0.59 -15.23 6.30 0.00 0.42 Design
LC-114 0.59 24.81 6.40 0.00 -0.61 Design
LC-115 0.78 0.00 24.27 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.78 0.00 2.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 0.78 -15.23 -11.48 0.00 0.42 Design
LC-118 0.78 24.81 -11.37 0.00 -0.61 Design
LC-200 0.65 0.00 -13.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.65 0.00 -40.77 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.65 0.00 -33.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.49 0.00 -8.99 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-204 0.49 -0.01 -10.59 0.00 -0.01 Design
LC-205 0.49 -6.47 -9.79 0.00 0.19 Design
LC-206 0.49 6.47 -9.79 0.00 -0.19 Design
LC-207 0.29 0.00 -5.07 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-208 0.29 -0.01 -6.67 0.00 -0.01 Design
LC-209 0.29 -6.47 -5.87 0.00 0.19 Design
LC-210 0.29 6.47 -5.87 0.00 -0.19 Design
LC-211 0.49 0.00 14.42 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.49 0.00 4.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.49 -6.85 -1.67 0.00 0.19 Design
LC-214 0.49 11.16 -1.62 0.00 -0.28 Design
LC-215 0.49 0.00 14.42 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.49 0.00 4.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.49 -6.85 -1.67 0.00 0.19 Design
LC-218 0.49 11.16 -1.62 0.00 -0.28 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
398
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
Support
NOTES
Connection NO: 8
DEMANDS
LC-1 0.00 0.35 -1.02 3.57 -3.22 0.00 0.00 -2.27 3.51 Design
LC-2 0.00 -0.37 1.10 -3.85 3.48 0.00 0.00 2.29 3.79 Design
LC-3 0.00 -20.44 -26.28 77.31 -97.75 0.00 0.00 -9.50 79.23 Design
LC-4 0.00 20.30 26.71 -78.81 99.11 0.00 0.00 9.63 80.62 Design
LC-5 0.00 -1.71 -16.26 53.31 -55.02 0.00 0.00 -46.50 52.09 Design
LC-6 0.00 -0.78 -7.74 25.38 -26.16 0.00 0.00 -14.49 24.79 Design
399
LC-7 0.00 -0.01 0.16 -0.55 0.54 0.00 0.00 -27.73 0.53 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.00 -0.30 0.99 -0.99 0.00 0.00 54.61 0.96 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.02 -0.11 0.35 -0.37 0.00 0.00 32.20 0.35 Design
LC-10 0.00 11.02 -12.80 48.16 -37.14 0.00 0.00 14.01 45.53 Design
LC-11 0.00 -7.79 10.73 -39.63 31.84 0.00 0.00 22.63 37.83 Design
LC-100 0.00 -2.39 -22.77 74.64 -77.03 0.00 0.00 -65.11 72.92 Design
LC-101 0.00 -3.29 -31.81 104.32 -107.61 0.00 0.00 -92.85 101.90 Design
LC-102 0.00 -2.44 -23.12 75.79 -78.24 0.00 0.00 -107.41 74.06 Design
LC-103 0.00 -2.09 -24.40 80.24 -82.33 0.00 0.00 -65.32 78.18 Design
LC-104 0.00 -2.81 -22.28 72.81 -75.62 0.00 0.00 -60.76 71.35 Design
LC-105 0.00 -22.88 -49.66 153.97 -176.85 0.00 0.00 -72.55 154.13 Design
LC-106 0.00 17.86 3.33 -2.15 20.01 0.00 0.00 -53.42 5.72 Design
LC-107 0.00 -1.19 -15.66 51.55 -52.74 0.00 0.00 -44.12 50.16 Design
LC-108 0.00 -1.91 -13.53 44.13 -46.04 0.00 0.00 -39.56 43.33 Design
LC-109 0.00 -21.98 -40.91 125.29 -147.27 0.00 0.00 -51.36 126.11 Design
LC-110 0.00 18.76 12.07 -30.83 49.60 0.00 0.00 -32.22 33.74 Design
LC-111 0.00 -1.53 -14.93 48.97 -50.51 0.00 0.00 12.76 47.83 Design
LC-112 0.00 -1.56 -14.75 48.34 -49.89 0.00 0.00 -9.66 47.23 Design
LC-113 0.00 9.49 -27.44 96.14 -86.66 0.00 0.00 -27.85 96.13 Design
LC-114 0.00 -9.32 -3.91 8.35 -17.67 0.00 0.00 -19.23 13.23 Design
LC-115 0.00 -2.44 -23.60 77.39 -79.82 0.00 0.00 -22.30 75.59 Design
LC-116 0.00 -2.46 -23.41 76.75 -79.21 0.00 0.00 -44.72 74.98 Design
LC-117 0.00 8.58 -36.11 124.56 -115.97 0.00 0.00 -62.91 122.98 Design
LC-118 0.00 -10.23 -12.57 36.76 -46.99 0.00 0.00 -54.29 40.99 Design
LC-200 0.00 -1.71 -16.26 53.31 -55.02 0.00 0.00 -46.50 52.09 Design
LC-201 0.00 -2.49 -23.84 78.15 -80.64 0.00 0.00 -88.72 76.35 Design
LC-202 0.00 -2.29 -21.94 71.94 -74.23 0.00 0.00 -78.17 70.28 Design
LC-203 0.00 -1.68 -18.55 60.95 -62.63 0.00 0.00 -46.97 59.43 Design
LC-204 0.00 -2.06 -17.41 56.94 -59.01 0.00 0.00 -44.51 55.74 Design
LC-205 0.00 -12.90 -32.19 100.77 -113.67 0.00 0.00 -50.88 100.44 Design
LC-206 0.00 9.10 -3.58 16.46 -7.37 0.00 0.00 -40.54 9.71 Design
LC-207 0.00 -0.58 -7.87 25.92 -26.50 0.00 0.00 -22.15 25.21 Design
LC-208 0.00 -0.97 -6.72 21.91 -22.88 0.00 0.00 -19.69 21.52 Design
LC-209 0.00 -11.81 -21.51 65.74 -77.54 0.00 0.00 -26.06 66.22 Design
LC-210 0.00 10.19 7.11 -18.57 28.76 0.00 0.00 -15.73 20.10 Design
LC-211 0.00 -1.28 -12.33 40.43 -41.71 0.00 0.00 -10.30 39.49 Design
LC-212 0.00 -1.29 -12.25 40.14 -41.43 0.00 0.00 -20.39 39.22 Design
LC-213 0.00 3.68 -17.96 61.66 -57.98 0.00 0.00 -28.58 60.64 Design
LC-214 0.00 -4.78 -7.37 22.15 -26.93 0.00 0.00 -24.70 23.92 Design
LC-215 0.00 -1.86 -18.13 59.47 -61.33 0.00 0.00 -21.17 58.08 Design
LC-216 0.00 -1.87 -18.05 59.18 -61.06 0.00 0.00 -31.26 57.81 Design
LC-217 0.00 3.10 -23.76 80.70 -77.60 0.00 0.00 -39.44 78.65 Design
LC-218 0.00 -5.37 -13.17 41.19 -46.56 0.00 0.00 -35.56 42.51 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
Thickness [mm] 13.46 5.07 - p. 9-5
DESIGN CHECK
400
Beam
Support
Connection NO: 9
Connection Name: CBB - N(94) - M(37,136,137,162)
DEMANDS
Description Pu Vu Mu33 Pu Vu Mu33 Pu Vu Load type
kN kN kN*m kN kN kN*m kN kN
LC-1 -0.16 0.00 0.00 -0.91 0.01 0.00 8.60 5.93 Design
LC-2 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.88 -0.01 0.00 -8.73 -5.92 Design
LC-3 -2.44 0.00 0.00 -36.97 0.00 0.00 59.95 4.74 Design
LC-4 -1.02 0.00 0.00 35.98 0.00 0.00 -63.29 -4.69 Design
LC-5 -0.26 -0.65 0.00 0.54 0.22 0.00 -20.49 -2.85 Design
LC-6 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 -0.22 -0.03 Design
LC-7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.05 0.00 -25.84 -4.90 Design
LC-8 -0.18 0.00 0.00 -0.14 0.12 0.00 61.60 15.74 Design
LC-9 -0.50 0.00 0.00 -0.20 0.08 0.00 42.60 5.02 Design
LC-10 2.02 0.00 0.00 -9.38 0.11 0.00 73.94 9.76 Design
LC-11 2.02 0.00 0.00 15.11 0.09 0.00 20.95 7.93 Design
LC-100 -0.36 -0.91 0.00 0.75 0.30 0.00 -28.68 -3.99 Design
401
LC-101 -0.34 -0.78 0.00 0.80 0.23 0.00 -37.86 -5.91 Design
LC-102 -0.33 -0.78 0.00 0.74 0.18 0.00 -66.03 -11.27 Design
LC-103 -0.48 -0.78 0.00 -0.23 0.27 0.00 -16.09 2.50 Design
LC-104 -0.31 -0.78 0.00 1.56 0.24 0.00 -33.42 -9.35 Design
LC-105 -2.76 -0.78 0.00 -36.28 0.26 0.00 35.25 1.31 Design
LC-106 -1.34 -0.78 0.00 36.67 0.26 0.00 -87.99 -8.12 Design
LC-107 -0.39 -0.59 0.00 -0.43 0.21 0.00 -9.84 3.37 Design
LC-108 -0.22 -0.59 0.00 1.36 0.18 0.00 -27.16 -8.48 Design
LC-109 -2.67 -0.59 0.00 -36.48 0.19 0.00 41.51 2.17 Design
LC-110 -1.26 -0.59 0.00 36.46 0.20 0.00 -81.73 -7.26 Design
LC-111 -0.41 -0.59 0.00 0.35 0.32 0.00 43.16 13.17 Design
LC-112 -0.73 -0.59 0.00 0.29 0.28 0.00 24.16 2.45 Design
LC-113 1.79 -0.59 0.00 -8.90 0.30 0.00 55.50 7.19 Design
LC-114 1.78 -0.59 0.00 15.60 0.28 0.00 2.51 5.36 Design
LC-115 -0.51 -0.78 0.00 0.57 0.35 0.00 23.99 9.85 Design
LC-116 -0.83 -0.78 0.00 0.51 0.32 0.00 4.98 -0.86 Design
LC-117 1.70 -0.78 0.00 -8.68 0.34 0.00 36.32 3.88 Design
LC-118 1.69 -0.78 0.00 15.82 0.32 0.00 -16.67 2.05 Design
LC-200 -0.26 -0.65 0.00 0.54 0.22 0.00 -20.49 -2.85 Design
LC-201 -0.29 -0.65 0.00 0.66 0.16 0.00 -46.55 -7.77 Design
LC-202 -0.28 -0.65 0.00 0.63 0.18 0.00 -40.03 -6.54 Design
LC-203 -0.29 -0.49 0.00 -0.02 0.17 0.00 -10.89 1.05 Design
LC-204 -0.20 -0.49 0.00 0.94 0.15 0.00 -20.25 -5.35 Design
LC-205 -1.53 -0.49 0.00 -19.49 0.16 0.00 16.84 0.40 Design
LC-206 -0.76 -0.49 0.00 19.90 0.16 0.00 -49.71 -4.69 Design
LC-207 -0.20 -0.29 0.00 -0.25 0.10 0.00 -4.57 1.92 Design
LC-208 -0.11 -0.29 0.00 0.71 0.09 0.00 -13.93 -4.48 Design
LC-209 -1.43 -0.29 0.00 -19.72 0.10 0.00 23.15 1.28 Design
LC-210 -0.67 -0.29 0.00 19.67 0.10 0.00 -43.40 -3.82 Design
LC-211 -0.28 -0.49 0.00 0.34 0.22 0.00 12.36 4.94 Design
LC-212 -0.42 -0.49 0.00 0.31 0.20 0.00 3.80 0.12 Design
LC-213 0.71 -0.49 0.00 -3.82 0.21 0.00 17.91 2.25 Design
LC-214 0.71 -0.49 0.00 7.20 0.20 0.00 -5.94 1.43 Design
LC-215 -0.29 -0.49 0.00 0.41 0.22 0.00 12.19 4.92 Design
LC-216 -0.43 -0.49 0.00 0.38 0.20 0.00 3.63 0.10 Design
LC-217 0.70 -0.49 0.00 -3.75 0.21 0.00 17.74 2.23 Design
LC-218 0.70 -0.49 0.00 7.27 0.20 0.00 -6.11 1.41 Design
Description Brace1 Brace2 Brace3 Brace4 Load type

kN kN kN kN
LC-1 0.00 1.27 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 -1.44 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 55.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 -59.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.00 -1.59 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 -0.18 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.06 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 -0.08 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 19.28 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 -22.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.00 -2.23 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.00 -2.24 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.00 -2.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.00 -0.74 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 0.00 -3.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 0.00 53.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 0.00 -61.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 0.00 -0.17 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.00 -2.88 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 0.00 54.08 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 0.00 -61.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 0.00 -1.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.00 -1.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 0.00 17.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 0.00 -23.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 0.00 -2.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.00 -2.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 0.00 17.24 0.00 0.00 Design
402
LC-118 0.00 -24.15 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.00 -1.59 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.00 -1.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.00 -1.78 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.00 -0.65 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.00 -2.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 0.00 28.65 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 0.00 -33.58 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.00 -0.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.00 -1.50 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 0.00 29.26 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 0.00 -32.97 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 0.00 -1.23 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.00 -1.43 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.00 7.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 0.00 -11.15 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 0.00 -1.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.00 -1.56 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.00 7.34 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 0.00 -11.28 0.00 0.00 Design
Interface between Gusset - Top left brace

Connection: Directly bolted
DEMANDS
Description Pu Load type
kN
LC-1 1.27 Design

LC-2 -1.44 Design
LC-3 55.52 Design
LC-4 -59.72 Design
LC-5 -1.59 Design
LC-6 -0.18 Design
LC-7 -0.06 Design
LC-8 -0.08 Design
LC-9 -0.52 Design
LC-10 19.28 Design
LC-11 -22.11 Design
LC-100 -2.23 Design
LC-101 -2.24 Design
LC-102 -2.11 Design
LC-103 -0.74 Design
LC-104 -3.45 Design
LC-105 53.51 Design
LC-106 -61.72 Design
LC-107 -0.17 Design
LC-108 -2.88 Design
LC-109 54.08 Design
LC-111 -1.51 Design
LC-112 -1.95 Design
LC-113 17.84 Design
LC-115 -2.11 Design
LC-116 -2.55 Design
LC-117 17.24 Design
LC-200 -1.59 Design
LC-201 -1.84 Design
LC-202 -1.78 Design
LC-203 -0.65 Design
LC-204 -2.11 Design
LC-205 28.65 Design
LC-207 -0.03 Design
LC-208 -1.50 Design
LC-209 29.26 Design
LC-211 -1.23 Design
LC-212 -1.43 Design
403
LC-213 7.48 Design
LC-215 -1.37 Design
LC-216 -1.56 Design
LC-217 7.34 Design
Directly bolted
Transverse edge distance [mm] 63.50 25.40 - Tables J3.4, J3.5
Longitudinal edge distance [mm] 38.10 25.40 - Tables J3.4, J3.5
Longitudinal center-to-center spacing (pitch) [mm] 76.20 50.80 190.80 Sec. J3.3, Sec. J3.5
Gusset
DESIGN CHECK
Directly bolted
Block shear rupture at brace web [kN] 257.35 55.52 LC-3-2 0.22 Eq. J4-5
Gusset
Bolt bearing on gusset [kN] 451.70 61.72 LC-106-17 0.14 Eq. J3-6
Ratio 0.39
Checks for gusset and brace
DESIGN CHECK
Brace
Yielding strength due to axial load [kN] 614.52 55.52 LC-3-2 0.09 Eq. J4-1
Gusset
Tension yielding on the Whitmore section [kN] 374.44 55.52 LC-3-2 0.15 Eq. J4-1
Buckling on the Whitmore section [kN] 349.87 61.72 LC-106-17 0.18 Eq. E3-1
Ratio 0.18
Calculation of the brace interface forces
Load condition :LC-1 DG29 p. 24-33
404
405

Upper left gusset interface - beam
Directly welded
DEMANDS
Description Ru Pu Mu Pu Mu22 Mu33 Load type
kN kN kN*m kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.74 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 -0.84 -0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 32.50 14.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 -34.96 -15.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
406
LC-5 -0.93 -0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 -0.11 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 -0.05 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 -0.30 -0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 11.29 5.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 -12.94 -5.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 -1.31 -0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 -1.31 -0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 -1.23 -0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 -0.43 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 -2.02 -0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 31.32 14.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 -36.13 -16.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.10 -0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 -1.68 -0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 31.66 14.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 -35.80 -16.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.89 -0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 -1.14 -0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 10.45 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 -13.78 -6.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 -1.24 -0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 -1.49 -0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 10.09 4.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 -14.14 -6.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.93 -0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 -1.08 -0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 -1.04 -0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.38 -0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 -1.24 -0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 16.77 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 -19.66 -8.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 -0.88 -0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 17.13 7.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 -19.30 -8.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 -0.72 -0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.84 -0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 4.38 1.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 -6.52 -2.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.80 -0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.92 -0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 4.30 1.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 -6.60 -2.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
DESIGN CHECK
Gusset
Beam yielding (normal stress) [kN] 1116.93 16.31 LC-106-17 0.01 Eq. B-1, Appendix B,
DG29, Eq. J4-1
Gusset edge tension stress [kN/m2] 223390.14 3262.60 LC-106-17 0.01 J4-1
Gusset edge shear stress [kN/m2] 148926.76 7225.91 LC-106-17 0.05 J4-1
Beam
Weld block shear [kN] 618.21 36.13 LC-106-17 0.06 Eq. J4-5
Web crippling [kN] 654.90 16.31 LC-106-17 0.02 Eq. J10-4, Eq. B-1,
Appendix B, DG29
Local web yielding [kN] 609.16 16.31 LC-106-17 0.03 Eq. J10-3, Eq. B-1,
Appendix B, DG29
Ratio 0.11
407
Upper left gusset interface - column
Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.68 0.01 8.60 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 -0.78 -0.01 -8.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 29.94 0.55 59.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 -32.21 -0.59 -63.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 -0.86 -0.02 -20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 -0.10 0.00 -0.22 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 -0.03 0.00 -25.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 -0.04 0.00 61.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 -0.28 -0.01 42.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 10.40 0.19 73.94 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 -11.92 -0.22 20.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 -1.20 -0.02 -28.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 -1.21 -0.02 -37.86 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 -1.14 -0.02 -66.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 -0.40 -0.01 -16.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 -1.86 -0.03 -33.42 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 28.86 0.53 35.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 -33.29 -0.61 -87.99 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.09 0.00 -9.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 -1.55 -0.03 -27.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 29.17 0.54 41.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 -32.98 -0.61 -81.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.82 -0.01 43.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 -1.05 -0.02 24.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 9.62 0.18 55.50 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 -12.70 -0.23 2.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 -1.14 -0.02 23.99 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 -1.38 -0.03 4.98 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 9.30 0.17 36.32 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 -13.02 -0.24 -16.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.86 -0.02 -20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 -0.99 -0.02 -46.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 -0.96 -0.02 -40.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.35 -0.01 -10.89 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 -1.14 -0.02 -20.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 15.45 0.28 16.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 -18.11 -0.33 -49.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.02 0.00 -4.57 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 -0.81 -0.01 -13.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 15.78 0.29 23.15 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 -17.78 -0.33 -43.40 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 -0.66 -0.01 12.36 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.77 -0.01 3.80 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 4.03 0.07 17.91 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 -6.01 -0.11 -5.94 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.74 -0.01 12.19 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.84 -0.02 3.63 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 3.96 0.07 17.74 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 -6.08 -0.11 -6.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 6.00 - 11.11 p. 10-102
Number of bolts 3 2.00 12.00 p 10-102
Distance from the bolt line to the weld line [mm] 76.20 - 88.90 p 10-102
Minimum plate or beam web thickness [mm] 6.00 - 11.11 Table 10-9
Length [mm] 254.00 210.94 254.00 p. 10-104
408
Horizontal edge distance [mm] 50.80 38.10 - p. 10-103
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 3 3.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
Support
Ratio 0.17
Load condition :LC-1
409
410

Right beam interface - column
Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 -0.16 8.60 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.02 -8.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 -2.44 59.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 -1.02 -63.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 -0.65 -0.26 -20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 -0.02 -0.22 0.00 0.00 Design
411
LC-7 0.00 -0.01 -25.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 -0.18 61.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 -0.50 42.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 2.02 73.94 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 2.02 20.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 -0.91 -0.36 -28.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 -0.78 -0.34 -37.86 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 -0.78 -0.33 -66.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 -0.78 -0.48 -16.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 -0.78 -0.31 -33.42 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 -0.78 -2.76 35.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 -0.78 -1.34 -87.99 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.59 -0.39 -9.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 -0.59 -0.22 -27.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 -0.59 -2.67 41.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 -0.59 -1.26 -81.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.59 -0.41 43.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 -0.59 -0.73 24.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 -0.59 1.79 55.50 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 -0.59 1.78 2.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 -0.78 -0.51 23.99 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 -0.78 -0.83 4.98 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 -0.78 1.70 36.32 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 -0.78 1.69 -16.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.65 -0.26 -20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 -0.65 -0.29 -46.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 -0.65 -0.28 -40.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.49 -0.29 -10.89 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 -0.49 -0.20 -20.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 -0.49 -1.53 16.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 -0.49 -0.76 -49.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.29 -0.20 -4.57 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 -0.29 -0.11 -13.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 -0.29 -1.43 23.15 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 -0.29 -0.67 -43.40 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 -0.49 -0.28 12.36 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.49 -0.42 3.80 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 -0.49 0.71 17.91 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 -0.49 0.71 -5.94 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.49 -0.29 12.19 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.49 -0.43 3.63 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 -0.49 0.70 17.74 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 -0.49 0.70 -6.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 50.00 - -
Length [mm] 161.60 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 20 20.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
412
Beam
Flexural yielding [kN] 94.40 0.91 LC-100-11 0.01 p. 9-6
Local web buckling [kN] 141.60 0.91 LC-100-11 0.01 p. 9-7
Flexural rupture [kN] 146.32 0.91 LC-100-11 0.01 p. 9-6
Support
Ratio 0.04
413
414

Left beam interface - column
Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 -0.32 -0.17 8.60 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.37 0.03 -8.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 -14.67 -4.47 59.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 15.78 1.03 -63.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.64 -0.40 -20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.05 -0.02 -0.22 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 -0.03 -0.01 -25.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.14 -0.18 61.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.22 -0.50 42.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 -4.99 1.90 73.94 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 5.93 2.17 20.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.89 -0.56 -28.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.82 -0.51 -37.86 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.73 -0.50 -66.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.47 -0.66 -16.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 1.16 -0.45 -33.42 0.00 0.00 Design
415
LC-105 -13.89 -4.96 35.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 16.57 0.54 -87.99 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 0.25 -0.53 -9.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.94 -0.33 -27.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 -14.10 -4.83 41.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 16.36 0.67 -81.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 0.72 -0.54 43.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.79 -0.86 24.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 -4.42 1.54 55.50 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 6.51 1.81 2.51 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 0.91 -0.67 23.99 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.99 -0.99 4.98 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 -4.22 1.41 36.32 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 6.70 1.68 -16.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.64 -0.40 -20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.65 -0.42 -46.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.65 -0.41 -40.03 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.34 -0.40 -10.89 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.71 -0.29 -20.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 -7.41 -2.72 16.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 9.04 0.24 -49.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.11 -0.27 -4.57 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.49 -0.16 -13.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 -7.64 -2.59 23.15 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 8.81 0.37 -43.40 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 0.54 -0.38 12.36 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.58 -0.52 3.80 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 -1.77 0.56 17.91 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 3.15 0.68 -5.94 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 0.58 -0.39 12.19 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.61 -0.53 3.63 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 -1.73 0.55 17.74 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 3.18 0.67 -6.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Length [mm] 161.60 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 20 20.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
416
Beam
Support
Ratio 0.29
NOTES
The plate is designed with the conventional configuration criteria.
REFERENCES
[9] AISC 2005, Design Examples Version 13.0, pp. IIC-26 - IIC-27
[8] Dowswell, B., 2003, Connection Design For Steel Structures, Structural Design Solutions, LLC. Chapter 13, p. 14
Connection NO: 10
Connection Name: CVR - N(128) - M(120,234,235)
DEMANDS
Description Pu Vu Mu33 Brace1 Brace2 Brace3 Brace4 Load type
kN kN kN*m kN kN kN kN
LC-1 -4.43 -0.05 -0.12 0.00 0.00 -0.26 0.15 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.00 0.00 -0.25 0.36 Design
LC-3 -62.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -66.05 66.05 Design
LC-4 7.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60.20 -60.21 Design
LC-5 0.00 -0.42 -0.23 0.00 0.00 -0.33 -0.92 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 -0.08 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.03 -0.08 0.00 0.00 -0.04 -0.03 Design
LC-8 0.00 -0.04 -0.10 0.00 0.00 -0.04 -0.05 Design
LC-9 -4.36 0.13 0.32 0.00 0.00 -0.28 0.59 Design
LC-10 -28.50 0.07 0.17 0.00 0.00 -28.53 28.69 Design
LC-11 11.75 0.05 0.14 0.00 0.00 28.08 -27.95 Design
LC-100 0.00 -0.58 -0.32 0.00 0.00 -0.47 -1.29 Design
LC-101 0.00 -0.51 -0.31 0.00 0.00 -0.29 -1.25 Design
LC-102 0.00 -0.55 -0.39 0.00 0.00 -0.43 -1.19 Design
LC-103 -4.43 -0.55 -0.39 0.00 0.00 -0.62 -1.00 Design
LC-104 0.00 -0.45 -0.15 0.00 0.00 -0.61 -0.79 Design
LC-105 -62.47 -0.50 -0.27 0.00 0.00 -66.41 64.90 Design
LC-106 7.55 -0.50 -0.28 0.00 0.00 59.84 -61.35 Design
LC-107 -4.43 -0.42 -0.32 0.00 0.00 -0.56 -0.68 Design
417
LC-108 0.00 -0.33 -0.09 0.00 0.00 -0.55 -0.47 Design
LC-109 -62.47 -0.37 -0.20 0.00 0.00 -66.35 65.22 Design
LC-110 7.55 -0.38 -0.21 0.00 0.00 59.90 -61.03 Design
LC-111 0.00 -0.41 -0.30 0.00 0.00 -0.35 -0.88 Design
LC-112 -4.36 -0.25 0.12 0.00 0.00 -0.58 -0.24 Design
LC-113 -28.50 -0.31 -0.04 0.00 0.00 -28.83 27.86 Design
LC-114 11.75 -0.32 -0.07 0.00 0.00 27.78 -28.78 Design
LC-115 0.00 -0.55 -0.41 0.00 0.00 -0.43 -1.21 Design
LC-116 -4.36 -0.39 0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.66 -0.57 Design
LC-117 -28.50 -0.45 -0.14 0.00 0.00 -28.91 27.53 Design
LC-118 11.75 -0.46 -0.17 0.00 0.00 27.70 -29.11 Design
LC-200 0.00 -0.42 -0.23 0.00 0.00 -0.33 -0.92 Design
LC-201 0.00 -0.45 -0.30 0.00 0.00 -0.30 -1.03 Design
LC-202 0.00 -0.44 -0.28 0.00 0.00 -0.31 -1.00 Design
LC-203 -2.39 -0.34 -0.23 0.00 0.00 -0.33 -0.67 Design
LC-204 0.00 -0.29 -0.11 0.00 0.00 -0.32 -0.56 Design
LC-205 -33.73 -0.31 -0.17 0.00 0.00 -35.85 34.91 Design
LC-206 4.08 -0.31 -0.17 0.00 0.00 32.32 -33.26 Design
LC-207 -2.39 -0.21 -0.17 0.00 0.00 -0.29 -0.34 Design
LC-208 0.00 -0.16 -0.04 0.00 0.00 -0.28 -0.22 Design
LC-209 -33.73 -0.19 -0.10 0.00 0.00 -35.82 35.25 Design
LC-210 4.08 -0.19 -0.10 0.00 0.00 32.36 -32.92 Design
LC-211 0.00 -0.33 -0.21 0.00 0.00 -0.27 -0.71 Design
LC-212 -1.96 -0.25 -0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.38 -0.43 Design
LC-213 -12.82 -0.28 -0.10 0.00 0.00 -13.09 12.22 Design
LC-214 5.29 -0.29 -0.11 0.00 0.00 12.39 -13.27 Design
LC-215 0.00 -0.33 -0.21 0.00 0.00 -0.21 -0.77 Design
LC-216 -1.96 -0.25 -0.02 0.00 0.00 -0.31 -0.49 Design
LC-217 -12.82 -0.28 -0.10 0.00 0.00 -13.03 12.16 Design
LC-218 5.29 -0.29 -0.11 0.00 0.00 12.45 -13.33 Design
Interface between Gusset - Bottom left brace

DEMANDS
kN
LC-1 -0.26 Design

LC-2 -0.25 Design
LC-3 -66.05 Design
LC-4 60.20 Design
LC-5 -0.33 Design
LC-6 0.08 Design
LC-7 -0.04 Design
LC-8 -0.04 Design
LC-9 -0.28 Design
LC-10 -28.53 Design
LC-11 28.08 Design
LC-100 -0.47 Design
LC-101 -0.29 Design
LC-102 -0.43 Design
LC-103 -0.62 Design
LC-104 -0.61 Design
LC-106 59.84 Design
LC-107 -0.56 Design
LC-108 -0.55 Design
LC-110 59.90 Design
LC-111 -0.35 Design
LC-112 -0.58 Design
LC-114 27.78 Design
LC-115 -0.43 Design
LC-116 -0.66 Design
LC-118 27.70 Design
LC-200 -0.33 Design
LC-201 -0.30 Design
LC-202 -0.31 Design
418
LC-203 -0.33 Design
LC-204 -0.32 Design
LC-206 32.32 Design
LC-207 -0.29 Design
LC-208 -0.28 Design
LC-210 32.36 Design
LC-211 -0.27 Design
LC-212 -0.38 Design
LC-214 12.39 Design
LC-215 -0.21 Design
LC-216 -0.31 Design
LC-218 12.45 Design
Directly bolted
Gusset
DESIGN CHECK
Directly bolted
Gusset
Ratio 0.42
DESIGN CHECK
Brace
Gusset
Ratio 0.18
419
420
421
Interface between Gusset - Bottom right brace
DEMANDS
kN
LC-1 0.15 Design

LC-2 0.36 Design
LC-3 66.05 Design
LC-4 -60.21 Design
LC-5 -0.92 Design
LC-6 -0.08 Design
LC-7 -0.03 Design
LC-8 -0.05 Design
LC-9 0.59 Design
LC-10 28.69 Design
LC-11 -27.95 Design
LC-100 -1.29 Design
LC-101 -1.25 Design
LC-102 -1.19 Design
LC-103 -1.00 Design
LC-104 -0.79 Design
LC-105 64.90 Design
LC-107 -0.68 Design
LC-108 -0.47 Design
LC-109 65.22 Design
LC-111 -0.88 Design
LC-112 -0.24 Design
LC-113 27.86 Design
LC-115 -1.21 Design
LC-116 -0.57 Design
LC-117 27.53 Design
LC-200 -0.92 Design
LC-201 -1.03 Design
LC-202 -1.00 Design
LC-203 -0.67 Design
LC-204 -0.56 Design
LC-205 34.91 Design
LC-207 -0.34 Design
LC-208 -0.22 Design
LC-209 35.25 Design
LC-211 -0.71 Design
LC-212 -0.43 Design
LC-213 12.22 Design
LC-215 -0.77 Design
LC-216 -0.49 Design
LC-217 12.16 Design
Directly bolted
Gusset
422
DESIGN CHECK
Directly bolted
Gusset
Ratio 0.41
DESIGN CHECK
Brace
Gusset
Ratio 0.19
423
424

425
426

Lower gusset interface - beam
Directly welded
DEMANDS
LC-1 0.23 -0.09 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.34 0.09 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 73.27 0.00 7.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 -66.79 0.00 -6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 -0.32 -1.04 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 -0.09 0.00 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.01 -0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 -0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.48 0.26 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 31.74 0.13 3.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 -31.08 0.11 -3.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 -0.45 -1.46 -0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 -0.53 -1.28 -0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 -0.42 -1.35 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
427
LC-103 -0.21 -1.35 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 -0.10 -1.16 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 72.84 -1.25 7.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 -67.23 -1.26 -6.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.07 -1.03 -0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.04 -0.84 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 72.98 -0.94 7.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 -67.08 -0.94 -6.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.30 -1.02 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.19 -0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 31.45 -0.81 3.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 -31.37 -0.83 -3.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 -0.43 -1.36 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.05 -1.03 -0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 31.31 -1.15 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 -31.51 -1.17 -3.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.32 -1.04 -0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 -0.41 -1.10 -0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 -0.39 -1.09 -0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.19 -0.83 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 -0.13 -0.73 -0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 39.26 -0.78 4.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 -36.38 -0.78 -3.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.02 -0.52 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.04 -0.42 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 39.42 -0.47 4.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 -36.21 -0.47 -3.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 -0.25 -0.82 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.03 -0.67 -0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 14.04 -0.72 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 -14.23 -0.73 -1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.31 -0.82 -0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.10 -0.67 -0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 13.97 -0.72 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 -14.30 -0.73 -1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
DESIGN CHECK
Gusset
DG29, Eq. J4-1
Beam
Appendix B, DG29
Appendix B, DG29
Ratio 0.16
REFERENCES
428
Current Date: 4/17/2022 5:18:50 AM

Units System: kN_m
Summary Table
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 BCF - N(73) - M (128,66) 0.887 OK
2 BCW - N(74) - (M 70,66) 0.288 OK
3 BCW - N(75) - (M 68,123) 0.237 OK
4 BCF - N(71) - M (63,69) 0.968 OK
5 BCF - N(69) - M (61,69) 0.331 OK
6 BCW - N(90) - (M 65,135) 0.364 OK
7 BCF - N(115) - (M 212,206) 0.155 OK
8 BCF - N(75) - M (68,188) 0.633 OK
9 CBB - N(94) - M (37,136,137,162,163) 0.432 OK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connection NO: 1
DEMANDS
LC-1 -6.93 0.71 29.43 -83.22 83.93 0.00 0.00 6.93 79.96 Design
LC-2 6.93 -0.71 -29.42 83.21 -83.91 0.00 0.00 -6.93 79.94 Design
LC-3 -0.05 0.04 0.27 -0.74 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.74 Design
LC-4 0.05 -0.04 -0.26 0.71 -0.75 0.00 0.00 -0.05 0.71 Design
LC-5 5.35 -0.41 -2.78 7.70 -8.11 0.00 0.00 -6.00 7.70 Design
LC-6 0.04 -0.02 -0.12 0.32 -0.34 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.32 Design
LC-7 11.72 -0.83 -5.59 15.47 -16.30 0.00 0.00 -11.72 15.47 Design
LC-8 -34.61 -8.04 51.89 -151.41 143.37 0.00 0.00 34.61 143.37 Design
LC-9 -26.41 27.75 2.30 7.33 20.42 0.00 0.00 26.41 7.33 Design
LC-10 -43.21 33.58 35.56 -84.21 117.79 0.00 0.00 43.21 84.21 Design
LC-11 -35.26 35.24 46.70 -115.04 150.27 0.00 0.00 35.26 115.04 Design
LC-100 7.49 -0.58 -3.90 10.78 -11.35 0.00 0.00 -8.41 10.78 Design
LC-101 12.35 -0.94 -6.32 17.48 -18.42 0.00 0.00 -13.13 17.48 Design
LC-102 25.19 -1.83 -12.34 34.15 -35.97 0.00 0.00 -25.98 34.15 Design
LC-103 -0.49 0.20 26.03 -73.83 74.03 0.00 0.00 -0.30 70.56 Design
LC-104 13.37 -1.21 -32.82 92.60 -93.81 0.00 0.00 -14.16 89.34 Design
LC-105 6.39 -0.46 -3.13 8.66 -9.12 0.00 0.00 -7.17 8.66 Design
LC-106 6.50 -0.54 -3.65 10.11 -10.65 0.00 0.00 -7.28 10.11 Design
LC-107 -2.11 0.34 26.92 -76.30 76.63 0.00 0.00 1.53 73.03 Design
LC-108 11.75 -1.08 -31.92 90.14 -91.21 0.00 0.00 -12.33 86.87 Design
LC-109 4.76 -0.33 -2.24 6.19 -6.52 0.00 0.00 -5.35 6.19 Design
LC-110 4.87 -0.41 -2.76 7.64 -8.05 0.00 0.00 -5.46 7.64 Design
LC-111 -29.79 -8.41 49.39 -144.48 136.07 0.00 0.00 29.21 136.07 Design
LC-112 -21.59 27.38 -0.20 14.26 13.12 0.00 0.00 21.01 13.12 Design
LC-113 -38.39 33.21 33.05 -77.28 110.49 0.00 0.00 37.81 77.28 Design
LC-114 -30.45 34.86 44.20 -108.11 142.97 0.00 0.00 29.86 108.11 Design
LC-115 -22.31 -8.96 45.70 -134.28 125.32 0.00 0.00 21.52 125.32 Design
LC-116 -14.11 26.83 -3.89 24.46 2.37 0.00 0.00 13.32 2.37 Design
LC-117 -30.91 32.67 29.37 -67.08 99.74 0.00 0.00 30.12 67.08 Design
LC-118 -22.96 34.32 40.51 -97.91 132.23 0.00 0.00 22.18 97.91 Design
LC-200 5.35 -0.41 -2.78 7.70 -8.11 0.00 0.00 -6.00 7.70 Design
LC-201 17.11 -1.26 -8.49 23.48 -24.74 0.00 0.00 -17.77 23.48 Design
LC-202 14.17 -1.05 -7.06 19.54 -20.58 0.00 0.00 -14.83 19.54 Design
429
LC-203 0.30 0.06 13.72 -38.93 38.99 0.00 0.00 -0.79 37.17 Design
LC-204 7.79 -0.70 -18.06 50.94 -51.65 0.00 0.00 -8.28 49.18 Design
LC-205 4.02 -0.30 -2.03 5.61 -5.91 0.00 0.00 -4.51 5.61 Design
LC-206 4.08 -0.34 -2.31 6.40 -6.74 0.00 0.00 -4.56 6.40 Design
LC-207 -1.33 0.20 14.64 -41.48 41.67 0.00 0.00 1.04 39.72 Design
LC-208 6.15 -0.57 -17.14 48.40 -48.96 0.00 0.00 -6.44 46.63 Design
LC-209 2.38 -0.16 -1.11 3.06 -3.23 0.00 0.00 -2.67 3.06 Design
LC-210 2.44 -0.21 -1.39 3.85 -4.06 0.00 0.00 -2.73 3.85 Design
LC-211 -11.56 -3.93 21.26 -62.36 58.43 0.00 0.00 11.07 58.43 Design
LC-212 -7.87 12.18 -1.05 9.07 3.11 0.00 0.00 7.38 3.11 Design
LC-213 -15.43 14.80 13.91 -32.12 46.92 0.00 0.00 14.94 32.12 Design
LC-214 -11.85 15.55 18.93 -45.99 61.54 0.00 0.00 11.37 45.99 Design
LC-215 -11.53 -3.94 21.18 -62.12 58.18 0.00 0.00 11.04 58.18 Design
LC-216 -7.84 12.16 -1.14 9.31 2.85 0.00 0.00 7.35 2.85 Design
LC-217 -15.40 14.79 13.83 -31.88 46.67 0.00 0.00 14.91 31.88 Design
LC-218 -11.82 15.53 18.84 -45.76 61.29 0.00 0.00 11.33 45.76 Design
Extended end plate

DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Beam
Web [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Support

Thin plate behavior controlled by bolt rupture with prying action
DESIGN CHECK

430
Beam
Support
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Connection NO: 2
DEMANDS
kN kN kN*m kN kN
LC-1 0.61 2.35 -4.31 13.42 -11.07 Design

LC-2 -0.61 -2.35 4.31 -13.41 11.06 Design
LC-3 0.01 0.05 0.05 -0.11 0.16 Design
LC-4 -0.01 -0.05 -0.05 0.12 -0.17 Design
LC-5 0.29 1.13 -5.47 16.10 -14.97 Design
LC-6 -0.01 -0.03 0.08 -0.25 0.23 Design
LC-7 0.69 2.66 -12.66 37.29 -34.62 Design
LC-8 0.23 0.90 23.05 -65.03 65.93 Design
LC-9 8.43 32.42 23.63 -50.89 83.32 Design
LC-10 10.92 41.98 17.83 -29.66 71.64 Design
LC-11 10.81 41.59 13.88 -18.62 60.21 Design
LC-100 0.41 1.58 -7.66 22.54 -20.96 Design
LC-101 0.69 2.64 -12.76 37.55 -34.91 Design
LC-102 1.46 5.60 -26.77 78.85 -73.25 Design
LC-103 0.96 3.69 -10.83 32.61 -28.92 Design
LC-104 -0.26 -1.01 -2.21 5.78 -6.79 Design
LC-105 0.36 1.39 -6.47 19.08 -17.69 Design
LC-106 0.34 1.29 -6.57 19.31 -18.02 Design
LC-107 0.87 3.36 -9.23 27.91 -24.54 Design
LC-108 -0.35 -1.33 -0.61 1.08 -2.41 Design
LC-109 0.28 1.06 -4.87 14.38 -13.31 Design
LC-110 0.25 0.97 -4.97 14.61 -13.64 Design
LC-111 0.50 1.91 18.13 -50.54 52.46 Design
431
LC-112 8.69 33.44 18.70 -36.41 69.84 Design
LC-113 11.18 43.00 12.91 -15.17 58.16 Design
LC-114 11.08 42.61 8.95 -4.13 46.74 Design
LC-115 0.93 3.57 10.20 -27.20 30.77 Design
LC-116 9.12 35.09 10.78 -13.06 48.15 Design
LC-117 11.61 44.65 4.98 8.18 36.47 Design
LC-118 11.51 44.26 1.03 19.22 25.05 Design
LC-200 0.29 1.13 -5.47 16.10 -14.97 Design
LC-201 0.98 3.76 -18.04 53.13 -49.37 Design
LC-202 0.81 3.10 -14.90 43.87 -40.77 Design
LC-203 0.54 2.09 -6.37 19.13 -17.03 Design
LC-204 -0.12 -0.44 -1.71 4.64 -5.08 Design
LC-205 0.22 0.85 -4.01 11.82 -10.97 Design
LC-206 0.21 0.80 -4.07 11.95 -11.15 Design
LC-207 0.46 1.78 -4.79 14.49 -12.71 Design
LC-208 -0.20 -0.76 -0.13 0.00 -0.76 Design
LC-209 0.14 0.53 -2.44 7.18 -6.65 Design
LC-210 0.13 0.48 -2.49 7.31 -6.83 Design
LC-211 0.32 1.25 6.27 -17.19 18.44 Design
LC-212 4.01 15.43 6.53 -10.83 26.26 Design
LC-213 5.13 19.74 3.92 -1.27 21.01 Design
LC-214 5.09 19.56 2.14 3.70 15.87 Design
LC-215 0.32 1.23 6.34 -17.38 18.61 Design
LC-216 4.01 15.41 6.59 -11.02 26.43 Design
LC-217 5.13 19.72 3.99 -1.46 21.18 Design
LC-218 5.08 19.54 2.21 3.51 16.04 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
DESIGN CHECK

432
Beam
REFERENCES
Connection NO: 3
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 -7.52 -2.29 4.77 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 7.51 2.34 -4.77 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 -0.08 -10.24 0.09 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 0.08 10.40 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-5 15.66 -0.06 -46.48 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-6 7.50 0.01 -14.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 -0.17 -27.73 -0.21 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 2.63 54.61 7.61 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.01 32.18 -2.32 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 2.20 13.70 2.65 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 1.87 22.93 4.12 0.00 Design
LC-100 21.92 -0.09 -65.08 -0.12 0.00 Design
LC-101 30.79 -0.15 -92.82 -0.20 0.00 Design
LC-102 22.54 -0.35 -107.39 -0.44 0.00 Design
LC-103 22.54 -7.59 -65.31 4.66 0.00 Design
LC-104 22.54 7.44 -60.69 -4.87 0.00 Design
LC-105 22.54 -0.16 -73.26 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-106 22.54 0.01 -52.62 -0.19 0.00 Design
LC-107 14.09 -7.57 -44.13 4.69 0.00 Design
LC-108 14.09 7.46 -39.50 -4.84 0.00 Design
LC-109 14.09 -0.14 -52.08 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-110 14.09 0.03 -31.43 -0.16 0.00 Design
LC-111 14.09 2.57 12.77 7.54 0.00 Design
LC-112 14.09 -0.05 -9.65 -2.40 0.00 Design
LC-113 14.09 2.14 -28.13 2.57 0.00 Design
LC-114 14.09 1.81 -18.91 4.04 0.00 Design
LC-115 22.54 2.47 -22.28 7.41 0.00 Design
LC-116 22.54 -0.15 -44.70 -2.53 0.00 Design
LC-117 22.54 2.04 -63.19 2.44 0.00 Design
LC-118 22.54 1.71 -53.96 3.91 0.00 Design
LC-200 15.66 -0.06 -46.48 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-201 23.16 -0.23 -88.70 -0.29 0.00 Design
LC-202 21.28 -0.19 -78.15 -0.24 0.00 Design
433
LC-203 17.37 -4.10 -46.96 2.51 0.00 Design
LC-204 17.37 4.02 -44.46 -2.64 0.00 Design
LC-205 17.37 -0.09 -51.26 -0.02 0.00 Design
LC-206 17.37 0.00 -40.11 -0.11 0.00 Design
LC-207 7.05 -4.09 -22.15 2.53 0.00 Design
LC-208 7.05 4.03 -19.66 -2.61 0.00 Design
LC-209 7.05 -0.07 -26.45 0.01 0.00 Design
LC-210 7.05 0.02 -15.30 -0.09 0.00 Design
LC-211 11.74 1.14 -10.29 3.36 0.00 Design
LC-212 11.74 -0.04 -20.38 -1.11 0.00 Design
LC-213 11.74 0.94 -28.70 1.13 0.00 Design
LC-214 11.74 0.79 -24.54 1.79 0.00 Design
LC-215 17.37 1.14 -21.15 3.36 0.00 Design
LC-216 17.37 -0.04 -31.24 -1.11 0.00 Design
LC-217 17.37 0.95 -39.56 1.13 0.00 Design
LC-218 17.37 0.80 -35.41 1.79 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 138.43 276.86 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
Support
434
NOTES
Connection NO: 4
DEMANDS
LC-1 -25.10 -13.77 47.85 -160.61 146.83 0.00 0.00 20.15 158.92 Design
LC-2 25.09 13.77 -47.84 160.58 -146.81 0.00 0.00 -20.15 158.90 Design
LC-3 -0.28 -0.19 0.45 -1.54 1.36 0.00 0.00 0.25 1.34 Design
LC-4 0.27 0.18 -0.44 1.50 -1.32 0.00 0.00 -0.24 1.30 Design
LC-5 5.88 -0.82 -4.68 14.62 -15.44 0.00 0.00 -13.73 15.00 Design
LC-6 -0.03 -0.01 0.06 -0.21 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.20 Design
LC-7 13.31 -1.75 -10.81 33.85 -35.60 0.00 0.00 -25.47 34.58 Design
LC-8 -60.48 3.83 104.49 -333.78 337.61 0.00 0.00 73.04 315.00 Design
LC-9 -4.50 25.35 -27.87 102.23 -76.87 0.00 0.00 47.74 96.16 Design
LC-10 -8.96 30.00 3.92 2.41 27.58 0.00 0.00 41.47 20.92 Design
LC-11 -35.25 27.60 45.44 -132.19 159.79 0.00 0.00 75.73 146.89 Design
LC-100 8.24 -1.15 -6.55 20.47 -21.61 0.00 0.00 -19.22 21.00 Design
LC-101 13.67 -1.88 -10.92 34.13 -36.01 0.00 0.00 -29.19 34.99 Design
LC-102 28.35 -3.78 -22.87 71.60 -75.38 0.00 0.00 -57.22 73.23 Design
LC-103 -18.05 -14.76 42.27 -143.17 128.41 0.00 0.00 3.68 140.96 Design
LC-104 32.14 12.78 -53.42 178.02 -165.24 0.00 0.00 -36.62 176.86 Design
LC-105 6.77 -1.18 -5.13 15.89 -17.07 0.00 0.00 -16.22 16.35 Design
LC-106 7.32 -0.81 -6.02 18.94 -19.75 0.00 0.00 -16.71 19.42 Design
LC-107 -19.80 -14.51 43.64 -147.45 132.94 0.00 0.00 7.80 145.37 Design
LC-108 30.39 13.03 -52.05 173.74 -160.70 0.00 0.00 -32.50 172.45 Design
LC-109 5.02 -0.92 -3.76 11.61 -12.54 0.00 0.00 -12.11 11.94 Design
LC-110 5.57 -0.56 -4.65 14.66 -15.21 0.00 0.00 -12.59 15.02 Design
LC-111 -55.18 3.09 100.28 -320.62 323.72 0.00 0.00 60.69 301.50 Design
LC-112 0.80 24.62 -32.08 115.38 -90.77 0.00 0.00 35.39 108.92 Design
LC-113 -3.67 29.26 -0.29 15.57 13.69 0.00 0.00 29.12 9.30 Design
LC-114 -29.95 26.86 41.23 -119.03 145.89 0.00 0.00 63.38 133.39 Design
LC-115 -46.78 1.97 93.50 -299.42 301.39 0.00 0.00 43.84 279.81 Design
LC-116 9.20 23.49 -38.86 136.59 -113.10 0.00 0.00 18.54 129.49 Design
LC-117 4.74 28.13 -7.07 36.78 -8.64 0.00 0.00 12.27 31.15 Design
LC-118 -21.54 25.74 34.45 -97.83 123.56 0.00 0.00 46.53 111.70 Design
LC-200 5.88 -0.82 -4.68 14.62 -15.44 0.00 0.00 -13.73 15.00 Design
LC-201 19.17 -2.58 -15.42 48.26 -50.84 0.00 0.00 -39.19 49.39 Design
LC-202 15.85 -2.14 -12.74 39.85 -41.99 0.00 0.00 -32.82 40.79 Design
LC-203 -9.16 -8.06 22.38 -75.92 67.86 0.00 0.00 0.59 74.69 Design
LC-204 17.94 6.81 -29.29 97.52 -90.71 0.00 0.00 -21.17 96.93 Design
LC-205 4.24 -0.73 -3.22 9.97 -10.70 0.00 0.00 -10.15 10.27 Design
LC-206 4.54 -0.53 -3.70 11.62 -12.14 0.00 0.00 -10.42 11.93 Design
LC-207 -10.91 -7.81 23.73 -80.15 72.34 0.00 0.00 4.70 79.04 Design
LC-208 16.20 7.07 -27.94 93.29 -86.22 0.00 0.00 -17.06 92.58 Design
LC-209 2.50 -0.47 -1.86 5.75 -6.21 0.00 0.00 -6.04 5.91 Design
LC-210 2.79 -0.27 -2.34 7.39 -7.66 0.00 0.00 -6.31 7.57 Design
LC-211 -22.80 1.11 43.51 -139.24 140.35 0.00 0.00 22.57 130.50 Design
LC-212 2.39 10.80 -16.05 56.97 -46.17 0.00 0.00 11.19 53.91 Design
LC-213 0.38 12.88 -1.75 12.05 0.83 0.00 0.00 8.37 9.38 Design
LC-214 -11.45 11.81 16.94 -48.52 60.33 0.00 0.00 23.78 54.85 Design
LC-215 -22.82 1.10 43.56 -139.40 140.49 0.00 0.00 22.58 130.64 Design
LC-216 2.37 10.78 -16.00 56.81 -46.02 0.00 0.00 11.20 53.75 Design
LC-217 0.36 12.87 -1.70 11.89 0.98 0.00 0.00 8.38 9.22 Design
LC-218 -11.47 11.79 16.99 -48.68 60.47 0.00 0.00 23.79 54.99 Design
435
Extended end plate

DG4 Sec. 2.1, 2.4, DG16 Sec. 2.5
Outer bolt distance (internal flange) [mm] 38.10 31.75 - DG4 Sec. 2.1
Beam
Web [1/16in] 4 3.00 - table J2.4
Support

DESIGN CHECK

Shear rupture [kN] 526.07 168.81 LC-8-7 0.32 DG4 Eq 3.14, AISC 358
Eq. 6.9-12, DG4 Eq. 3.13
Beam
Support
436
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
2.2.3, DG4 Eq. 3.21
Connection NO: 5
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 -15.21 -24.25 -25.10 0.00 59.74 Design

LC-2 15.21 24.25 25.09 0.00 -59.73 Design
LC-3 -0.15 -0.30 -0.28 0.00 0.70 Design
LC-4 0.15 0.29 0.27 0.00 -0.68 Design
LC-5 -4.55 -3.48 -6.32 0.00 3.07 Design
LC-6 -0.02 -0.03 -0.03 0.00 0.05 Design
LC-7 -10.08 -7.62 -12.52 0.00 6.55 Design
LC-8 -10.74 -14.68 -16.53 0.00 85.58 Design
LC-9 41.67 35.02 53.45 0.00 -71.34 Design
LC-10 14.16 31.35 27.64 0.00 -17.81 Design
LC-11 13.73 22.00 22.70 0.00 12.00 Design
LC-100 -6.37 -4.87 -8.85 0.00 4.30 Design
LC-101 -10.53 -8.02 -13.88 0.00 7.05 Design
LC-102 -21.60 -16.38 -27.62 0.00 14.19 Design
LC-103 -20.68 -28.44 -32.69 0.00 63.45 Design
LC-104 9.74 20.07 17.50 0.00 -56.02 Design
LC-105 -5.62 -4.48 -7.87 0.00 4.41 Design
LC-106 -5.32 -3.89 -7.32 0.00 3.03 Design
LC-107 -19.31 -27.38 -30.79 0.00 62.50 Design
LC-108 11.11 21.12 19.41 0.00 -56.96 Design
LC-109 -4.25 -3.43 -5.96 0.00 3.46 Design
LC-110 -3.95 -2.84 -5.42 0.00 2.08 Design
LC-111 -14.83 -17.81 -22.21 0.00 88.34 Design
LC-112 37.58 31.89 47.77 0.00 -68.58 Design
LC-113 10.07 28.22 21.95 0.00 -15.04 Design
LC-114 9.63 18.88 17.02 0.00 14.76 Design
LC-115 -21.24 -22.68 -30.38 0.00 92.57 Design
LC-116 31.16 27.03 39.60 0.00 -64.36 Design
LC-117 3.65 23.35 13.79 0.00 -10.82 Design
LC-118 3.22 14.01 8.85 0.00 18.98 Design
LC-200 -4.55 -3.48 -6.32 0.00 3.07 Design
LC-201 -14.65 -11.12 -18.86 0.00 9.67 Design
LC-202 -12.12 -9.21 -15.73 0.00 8.02 Design
LC-203 -11.64 -15.72 -18.31 0.00 34.60 Design
LC-204 4.79 10.47 8.79 0.00 -29.91 Design
LC-205 -3.51 -2.79 -4.91 0.00 2.72 Design
LC-206 -3.34 -2.47 -4.61 0.00 1.98 Design
437
LC-207 -10.26 -14.66 -16.40 0.00 33.64 Design
LC-208 6.17 11.53 10.71 0.00 -30.87 Design
LC-209 -2.13 -1.72 -2.99 0.00 1.76 Design
LC-210 -1.97 -1.41 -2.70 0.00 1.02 Design
LC-211 -8.24 -9.21 -12.18 0.00 40.81 Design
LC-212 15.34 13.15 19.31 0.00 -29.80 Design
LC-213 2.96 11.50 7.70 0.00 -5.71 Design
LC-214 2.76 7.30 5.48 0.00 7.70 Design
LC-215 -8.26 -9.23 -12.20 0.00 40.85 Design
LC-216 15.33 13.13 19.29 0.00 -29.76 Design
LC-217 2.95 11.48 7.68 0.00 -5.67 Design
LC-218 2.75 7.28 5.46 0.00 7.74 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 137.41 274.83 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
Support
NOTES
438
Connection NO: 6
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 0.00 6.93 -0.01 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.00 -6.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 1.41 0.05 -0.29 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 -1.18 -0.05 -0.10 0.00 Design
LC-5 -0.65 0.00 -8.76 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 -0.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -11.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.01 34.61 -0.02 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.00 26.41 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 26.24 43.21 -8.62 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 -16.02 35.26 5.11 0.00 Design
LC-100 -0.91 0.00 -12.27 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 -0.78 0.00 -16.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 -0.78 0.00 -29.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 -0.78 0.00 -3.61 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-104 -0.78 0.00 -17.47 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 -0.78 1.41 -10.48 -0.28 0.00 Design
LC-106 -0.78 -1.18 -10.59 -0.10 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.59 0.00 -0.96 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-108 -0.59 0.00 -14.82 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 -0.59 1.41 -7.83 -0.28 0.00 Design
LC-110 -0.59 -1.18 -7.94 -0.10 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.59 0.01 26.72 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-112 -0.59 0.00 18.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 -0.59 26.24 35.32 -8.62 0.00 Design
LC-114 -0.59 -16.02 27.38 5.11 0.00 Design
LC-115 -0.78 0.01 18.21 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-116 -0.78 0.00 10.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 -0.78 26.24 26.81 -8.62 0.00 Design
LC-118 -0.78 -16.02 18.87 5.11 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.65 0.00 -8.76 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 -0.65 0.00 -20.53 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 -0.65 0.00 -17.58 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.49 0.00 -2.86 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 -0.49 0.00 -10.35 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 -0.49 0.76 -6.58 -0.15 0.00 Design
LC-206 -0.49 -0.64 -6.63 -0.05 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.29 0.00 -0.20 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 -0.29 0.00 -7.69 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 -0.29 0.76 -3.91 -0.15 0.00 Design
LC-210 -0.29 -0.64 -3.97 -0.05 0.00 Design
LC-211 -0.49 0.00 9.00 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.49 0.00 5.31 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 -0.49 11.81 12.87 -3.88 0.00 Design
LC-214 -0.49 -7.21 9.30 2.30 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.49 0.00 8.97 -0.01 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.49 0.00 5.28 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 -0.49 11.81 12.84 -3.88 0.00 Design
LC-218 -0.49 -7.21 9.26 2.30 0.00 Design
439
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
Support
NOTES
Connection NO: 7
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 0.01 1.51 0.00 0.02 Design
440
LC-2 0.00 -0.01 -1.51 0.00 -0.02 Design
LC-3 0.00 -12.17 0.00 0.00 0.34 Design
LC-4 0.00 12.16 0.00 0.00 -0.36 Design
LC-5 0.65 0.00 -13.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -27.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.00 53.79 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.00 32.23 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 -15.23 18.04 0.00 0.43 Design
LC-11 0.00 24.80 18.15 0.00 -0.62 Design
LC-100 0.91 0.00 -18.27 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.78 0.00 -29.52 0.00 -0.01 Design
LC-102 0.78 0.00 -60.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.78 0.01 -14.15 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-104 0.78 -0.02 -17.17 0.00 -0.02 Design
LC-105 0.78 -12.18 -15.66 0.00 0.33 Design
LC-106 0.78 12.16 -15.66 0.00 -0.37 Design
LC-107 0.59 0.01 -10.24 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-108 0.59 -0.01 -13.25 0.00 -0.02 Design
LC-109 0.59 -12.17 -11.74 0.00 0.34 Design
LC-110 0.59 12.16 -11.75 0.00 -0.36 Design
LC-111 0.59 0.00 42.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.59 0.00 20.49 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 0.59 -15.23 6.30 0.00 0.42 Design
LC-114 0.59 24.80 6.40 0.00 -0.63 Design
LC-115 0.78 0.00 24.27 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.78 0.00 2.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 0.78 -15.23 -11.48 0.00 0.42 Design
LC-118 0.78 24.80 -11.37 0.00 -0.63 Design
LC-200 0.65 0.00 -13.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.65 0.00 -40.77 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.65 0.00 -33.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.49 0.00 -8.97 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-204 0.49 -0.01 -10.60 0.00 -0.01 Design
LC-205 0.49 -6.58 -9.79 0.00 0.18 Design
LC-206 0.49 6.56 -9.79 0.00 -0.20 Design
LC-207 0.29 0.00 -5.06 0.00 0.01 Design
LC-208 0.29 -0.01 -6.69 0.00 -0.01 Design
LC-209 0.29 -6.57 -5.87 0.00 0.18 Design
LC-210 0.29 6.56 -5.87 0.00 -0.20 Design
LC-211 0.49 0.00 14.42 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.49 0.00 4.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.49 -6.85 -1.67 0.00 0.19 Design
LC-214 0.49 11.16 -1.62 0.00 -0.28 Design
LC-215 0.49 0.00 14.42 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.49 0.00 4.72 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.49 -6.85 -1.67 0.00 0.19 Design
LC-218 0.49 11.16 -1.62 0.00 -0.28 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 12.70 - 13.90 p. 10-89
Length [mm] 165.10 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 6 5.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
441
Shear plate
Beam
Support
NOTES
Connection NO: 8
DEMANDS
LC-1 0.00 0.34 -1.01 3.53 -3.19 0.00 0.00 -2.29 3.47 Design
LC-2 0.00 -0.39 1.16 -4.06 3.67 0.00 0.00 2.34 3.99 Design
LC-3 0.00 -20.09 -28.65 85.38 -105.47 0.00 0.00 -10.24 86.79 Design
LC-4 0.00 19.91 29.19 -87.27 107.17 0.00 0.00 10.40 88.51 Design
LC-5 0.00 -1.73 -16.19 53.07 -54.79 0.00 0.00 -46.48 51.86 Design
LC-6 0.00 -0.78 -7.73 25.35 -26.13 0.00 0.00 -14.49 24.75 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 0.14 -0.47 0.47 0.00 0.00 -27.73 0.45 Design
LC-8 0.00 0.00 -0.30 1.02 -1.01 0.00 0.00 54.61 0.98 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.00 -0.16 0.52 -0.53 0.00 0.00 32.18 0.50 Design
LC-10 0.00 11.36 -13.81 51.67 -40.31 0.00 0.00 13.70 48.98 Design
LC-11 0.00 -8.12 11.72 -43.09 34.97 0.00 0.00 22.93 41.23 Design
LC-100 0.00 -2.42 -22.67 74.29 -76.71 0.00 0.00 -65.08 72.60 Design
LC-101 0.00 -3.33 -31.72 104.00 -107.32 0.00 0.00 -92.82 101.61 Design
LC-102 0.00 -2.46 -23.07 75.60 -78.06 0.00 0.00 -107.39 73.88 Design
LC-103 0.00 -2.12 -24.30 79.88 -82.01 0.00 0.00 -65.31 77.85 Design
LC-104 0.00 -2.86 -22.13 72.29 -75.15 0.00 0.00 -60.69 70.87 Design
LC-105 0.00 -22.56 -51.94 161.74 -184.29 0.00 0.00 -73.26 161.39 Design
LC-106 0.00 17.44 5.90 -10.91 28.36 0.00 0.00 -52.62 13.91 Design
442
LC-107 0.00 -1.21 -15.58 51.29 -52.50 0.00 0.00 -44.13 49.92 Design
LC-108 0.00 -1.95 -13.41 43.70 -45.65 0.00 0.00 -39.50 42.94 Design
LC-109 0.00 -21.65 -43.22 133.14 -154.79 0.00 0.00 -52.08 133.46 Design
LC-110 0.00 18.35 14.62 -39.51 57.86 0.00 0.00 -31.43 41.84 Design
LC-111 0.00 -1.55 -14.88 48.78 -50.33 0.00 0.00 12.77 47.65 Design
LC-112 0.00 -1.56 -14.73 48.28 -49.84 0.00 0.00 -9.65 47.18 Design
LC-113 0.00 9.80 -28.38 99.43 -89.62 0.00 0.00 -28.13 99.38 Design
LC-114 0.00 -9.68 -2.85 4.67 -14.35 0.00 0.00 -18.91 9.85 Design
LC-115 0.00 -2.46 -23.53 77.13 -79.59 0.00 0.00 -22.28 75.36 Design
LC-116 0.00 -2.47 -23.38 76.64 -79.11 0.00 0.00 -44.70 74.88 Design
LC-117 0.00 8.89 -37.03 127.78 -118.89 0.00 0.00 -63.19 126.26 Design
LC-118 0.00 -10.59 -11.51 33.03 -43.62 0.00 0.00 -53.96 37.55 Design
LC-200 0.00 -1.73 -16.19 53.07 -54.79 0.00 0.00 -46.48 51.86 Design
LC-201 0.00 -2.51 -23.78 77.94 -80.45 0.00 0.00 -88.70 76.16 Design
LC-202 0.00 -2.31 -21.88 71.72 -74.04 0.00 0.00 -78.15 70.08 Design
LC-203 0.00 -1.70 -18.48 60.72 -62.41 0.00 0.00 -46.96 59.21 Design
LC-204 0.00 -2.10 -17.31 56.62 -58.71 0.00 0.00 -44.46 55.44 Design
LC-205 0.00 -12.73 -33.41 104.92 -117.65 0.00 0.00 -51.26 104.32 Design
LC-206 0.00 8.87 -2.18 11.69 -2.82 0.00 0.00 -40.11 4.84 Design
LC-207 0.00 -0.59 -7.83 25.79 -26.38 0.00 0.00 -22.15 25.09 Design
LC-208 0.00 -0.99 -6.66 21.69 -22.68 0.00 0.00 -19.66 21.32 Design
LC-209 0.00 -11.63 -22.76 69.99 -81.61 0.00 0.00 -26.45 70.20 Design
LC-210 0.00 9.97 8.48 -23.24 33.22 0.00 0.00 -15.30 24.46 Design
LC-211 0.00 -1.29 -12.28 40.26 -41.55 0.00 0.00 -10.29 39.33 Design
LC-212 0.00 -1.30 -12.21 40.03 -41.33 0.00 0.00 -20.38 39.12 Design
LC-213 0.00 3.81 -18.36 63.05 -59.24 0.00 0.00 -28.70 62.05 Design
LC-214 0.00 -4.95 -6.87 20.41 -25.36 0.00 0.00 -24.54 22.32 Design
LC-215 0.00 -1.88 -18.08 59.27 -61.15 0.00 0.00 -21.15 57.90 Design
LC-216 0.00 -1.89 -18.01 59.04 -60.93 0.00 0.00 -31.24 57.68 Design
LC-217 0.00 3.23 -24.15 82.06 -78.83 0.00 0.00 -39.56 80.03 Design
LC-218 0.00 -5.54 -12.67 39.42 -44.96 0.00 0.00 -35.41 40.89 Design
Plate (beam side)

Beam
Support
Thickness [mm] 13.46 5.07 - p. 9-5
DESIGN CHECK

443
Beam
Support
Connection NO: 9
Connection Name: CBB - N(94) - M(37,136,137,162,163)
DEMANDS
Description Pu Vu Mu33 Pu Vu Mu33 Pu Vu Load type
kN kN kN*m kN kN kN*m kN kN
LC-1 0.09 0.00 0.00 -1.57 0.00 0.00 8.46 5.82 Design
LC-2 0.22 0.00 0.00 -1.64 0.00 0.00 -9.67 -5.80 Design
LC-3 7.01 0.00 0.00 -61.38 0.00 0.00 59.73 4.61 Design
LC-4 8.54 0.00 0.00 -69.04 0.00 0.00 -112.82 -4.45 Design
LC-5 -0.09 -0.65 0.00 -0.42 0.65 0.00 -20.37 -2.60 Design
LC-6 0.01 0.00 0.00 -0.20 0.00 0.00 -0.35 -0.02 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -25.88 -4.90 Design
LC-8 1.00 0.00 0.00 -5.45 0.00 0.00 59.37 15.74 Design
LC-9 0.41 0.00 0.00 -3.60 0.00 0.00 41.11 5.03 Design
LC-10 7.05 0.00 0.00 -18.44 0.00 0.00 76.01 9.77 Design
LC-11 7.12 0.00 0.00 -39.19 0.00 0.00 -7.92 7.99 Design
LC-100 -0.13 -0.91 0.00 -0.58 0.91 0.00 -28.52 -3.63 Design
LC-101 -0.09 -0.78 0.00 -0.82 0.78 0.00 -37.95 -5.60 Design
LC-102 -0.11 -0.78 0.00 -0.60 0.78 0.00 -66.04 -10.96 Design
LC-103 -0.01 -0.78 0.00 -2.17 0.78 0.00 -16.16 2.69 Design
LC-104 0.12 -0.78 0.00 -2.24 0.78 0.00 -34.29 -8.93 Design
LC-105 6.90 -0.78 0.00 -61.98 0.78 0.00 35.11 1.48 Design
LC-106 8.44 -0.78 0.00 -69.64 0.78 0.00 -137.45 -7.57 Design
LC-107 0.01 -0.59 0.00 -1.94 0.59 0.00 -9.87 3.48 Design
LC-108 0.14 -0.59 0.00 -2.02 0.59 0.00 -28.01 -8.14 Design
LC-109 6.93 -0.59 0.00 -61.75 0.59 0.00 41.40 2.27 Design
LC-110 8.46 -0.59 0.00 -69.41 0.59 0.00 -131.16 -6.78 Design
LC-111 0.92 -0.59 0.00 -5.83 0.59 0.00 41.04 13.41 Design
LC-112 0.33 -0.59 0.00 -3.98 0.59 0.00 22.78 2.69 Design
LC-113 6.97 -0.59 0.00 -18.81 0.59 0.00 57.68 7.43 Design
444
LC-114 7.04 -0.59 0.00 -39.56 0.59 0.00 -26.25 5.65 Design
LC-115 0.90 -0.78 0.00 -6.05 0.78 0.00 21.81 10.17 Design
LC-116 0.30 -0.78 0.00 -4.21 0.78 0.00 3.55 -0.55 Design
LC-117 6.95 -0.78 0.00 -19.04 0.78 0.00 38.45 4.20 Design
LC-118 7.02 -0.78 0.00 -39.79 0.78 0.00 -45.48 2.41 Design
LC-200 -0.09 -0.65 0.00 -0.42 0.65 0.00 -20.37 -2.60 Design
LC-201 -0.08 -0.65 0.00 -0.62 0.65 0.00 -46.61 -7.52 Design
LC-202 -0.08 -0.65 0.00 -0.57 0.65 0.00 -40.05 -6.29 Design
LC-203 -0.01 -0.49 0.00 -1.31 0.49 0.00 -10.97 1.17 Design
LC-204 0.06 -0.49 0.00 -1.35 0.49 0.00 -20.77 -5.10 Design
LC-205 3.72 -0.49 0.00 -33.61 0.49 0.00 16.71 0.52 Design
LC-206 4.55 -0.49 0.00 -37.74 0.49 0.00 -76.47 -4.37 Design
LC-207 0.01 -0.29 0.00 -1.04 0.29 0.00 -4.60 1.97 Design
LC-208 0.08 -0.29 0.00 -1.07 0.29 0.00 -14.39 -4.30 Design
LC-209 3.74 -0.29 0.00 -33.33 0.29 0.00 23.09 1.32 Design
LC-210 4.57 -0.29 0.00 -37.47 0.29 0.00 -70.09 -3.57 Design
LC-211 0.38 -0.49 0.00 -2.77 0.49 0.00 11.44 5.14 Design
LC-212 0.11 -0.49 0.00 -1.93 0.49 0.00 3.22 0.31 Design
LC-213 3.10 -0.49 0.00 -8.61 0.49 0.00 18.93 2.45 Design
LC-214 3.13 -0.49 0.00 -17.95 0.49 0.00 -18.84 1.65 Design
LC-215 0.39 -0.49 0.00 -2.92 0.49 0.00 11.17 5.12 Design
LC-216 0.12 -0.49 0.00 -2.09 0.49 0.00 2.96 0.30 Design
LC-217 3.11 -0.49 0.00 -8.76 0.49 0.00 18.66 2.43 Design
LC-218 3.14 -0.49 0.00 -18.10 0.49 0.00 -19.11 1.63 Design
Description Brace1 Brace2 Brace3 Brace4 Load type

kN kN kN kN
LC-1 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.00 2.26 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 80.10 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 0.00 96.08 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 3.23 4.56 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 1.56 3.28 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 30.86 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 0.00 55.83 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.00 0.00 1.25 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.00 2.00 0.96 0.00 Design
LC-104 0.00 0.00 3.22 0.00 Design
LC-105 0.00 80.10 0.96 0.00 Design
LC-106 0.00 0.00 97.05 0.00 Design
LC-107 0.00 2.00 0.63 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.00 0.00 2.88 0.00 Design
LC-109 0.00 80.10 0.63 0.00 Design
LC-110 0.00 0.00 96.71 0.00 Design
LC-111 0.00 3.23 5.19 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.00 1.56 3.91 0.00 Design
LC-113 0.00 30.86 0.63 0.00 Design
LC-114 0.00 0.00 56.45 0.00 Design
LC-115 0.00 3.23 5.52 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.00 1.56 4.25 0.00 Design
LC-117 0.00 30.86 0.96 0.00 Design
LC-118 0.00 0.00 56.79 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.00 1.08 0.72 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.00 0.00 1.93 0.00 Design
LC-205 0.00 43.25 0.72 0.00 Design
LC-206 0.00 0.00 52.60 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.00 1.08 0.31 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.00 0.00 1.53 0.00 Design
LC-209 0.00 43.25 0.31 0.00 Design
LC-210 0.00 0.00 52.20 0.00 Design
LC-211 0.00 1.46 2.57 0.00 Design
445
LC-212 0.00 0.70 2.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.00 13.89 0.52 0.00 Design
LC-214 0.00 0.00 25.64 0.00 Design
LC-215 0.00 1.46 2.77 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.00 0.70 2.19 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.00 13.89 0.72 0.00 Design
LC-218 0.00 0.00 25.84 0.00 Design
Interface between Gusset - Top left brace

Connection: Directly welded
DEMANDS
kN
LC-1 2.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 Design
LC-3 80.10 Design
LC-4 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 Design
LC-8 3.23 Design
LC-9 1.56 Design
LC-10 30.86 Design
LC-11 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.00 Design
LC-103 2.00 Design
LC-104 0.00 Design
LC-105 80.10 Design
LC-106 0.00 Design
LC-107 2.00 Design
LC-108 0.00 Design
LC-109 80.10 Design
LC-110 0.00 Design
LC-111 3.23 Design
LC-112 1.56 Design
LC-113 30.86 Design
LC-114 0.00 Design
LC-115 3.23 Design
LC-116 1.56 Design
LC-117 30.86 Design
LC-118 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.00 Design
LC-203 1.08 Design
LC-204 0.00 Design
LC-205 43.25 Design
LC-206 0.00 Design
LC-207 1.08 Design
LC-208 0.00 Design
LC-209 43.25 Design
LC-210 0.00 Design
LC-211 1.46 Design
LC-212 0.70 Design
LC-213 13.89 Design
LC-214 0.00 Design
LC-215 1.46 Design
LC-216 0.70 Design
LC-217 13.89 Design
LC-218 0.00 Design
446
DESIGN CHECK
Brace - Directly welded Connection

Total weld design strength [kN] 619.24 80.10 LC-3-2 0.13 Eq. J2-4, Eq. J2-6
Maximum weld force that brace can develop [kN] 776.90 80.10 LC-3-2 0.10 Eq. J4-4
Gusset
Maximum weld force that gusset can develop [kN] 1741.48 80.10 LC-3-2 0.05 Eq. J4-4
Block shear on gusset [kN] 2059.75 80.10 LC-3-2 0.04 Eq. J4-5
Ratio 0.13
DESIGN CHECK
Brace
Gusset
Ratio 0.14
447
448

Upper left gusset interface - beam
Directly welded
DEMANDS
LC-1 1.64 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 65.60 21.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 2.65 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 1.28 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 25.28 8.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 1.64 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 65.60 21.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 1.64 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 65.60 21.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 2.65 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 1.28 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 25.28 8.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
449
LC-115 2.65 0.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 1.28 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 25.28 8.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.89 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 35.42 11.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.89 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 35.42 11.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 1.19 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.58 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 11.37 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 1.19 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.58 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 11.37 3.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
DESIGN CHECK
Gusset
DG29, Eq. J4-1
Beam
Appendix B, DG29
Appendix B, DG29
Ratio 0.12
Upper left gusset interface - column

Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.59 0.02 8.46 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.00 -9.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 23.74 0.79 59.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 0.00 -112.82 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.00 0.00 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.00 -0.35 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -25.88 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.96 0.03 59.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.46 0.02 41.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 9.15 0.30 76.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 0.00 -7.92 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.00 0.00 -28.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.00 0.00 -37.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.00 0.00 -66.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.59 0.02 -16.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 0.00 0.00 -34.29 0.00 0.00 Design
450
LC-105 23.74 0.79 35.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 0.00 0.00 -137.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 0.59 0.02 -9.87 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.00 0.00 -28.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 23.74 0.79 41.40 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 0.00 0.00 -131.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 0.96 0.03 41.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 0.46 0.02 22.78 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 9.15 0.30 57.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 0.00 0.00 -26.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 0.96 0.03 21.81 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 0.46 0.02 3.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 9.15 0.30 38.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 0.00 0.00 -45.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.00 0.00 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.00 0.00 -46.61 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.00 0.00 -40.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.32 0.01 -10.97 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.00 0.00 -20.77 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 12.82 0.43 16.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 0.00 0.00 -76.47 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.32 0.01 -4.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.00 0.00 -14.39 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 12.82 0.43 23.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 0.00 0.00 -70.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 0.43 0.01 11.44 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.21 0.01 3.22 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 4.12 0.14 18.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 0.00 0.00 -18.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 0.43 0.01 11.17 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.21 0.01 2.96 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 4.12 0.14 18.66 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 0.00 0.00 -19.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 6.00 - 11.11 p. 10-102
Number of bolts 2 2.00 12.00 p 10-102
Length [mm] 177.80 116.50 177.80 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 3 3.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
451
Beam
Support
Ratio 0.22
Interface between Gusset - Bottom left brace

Connection: Directly welded
DEMANDS
kN
LC-1 0.00 Design

LC-2 2.26 Design
LC-3 0.00 Design
LC-4 96.08 Design
LC-5 0.70 Design
LC-6 0.26 Design
LC-7 0.00 Design
LC-8 4.56 Design
LC-9 3.28 Design
LC-10 0.00 Design
LC-11 55.83 Design
LC-100 0.97 Design
LC-101 1.25 Design
LC-102 0.96 Design
LC-103 0.96 Design
LC-104 3.22 Design
LC-105 0.96 Design
LC-106 97.05 Design
LC-107 0.63 Design
LC-108 2.88 Design
LC-109 0.63 Design
LC-110 96.71 Design
LC-111 5.19 Design
LC-112 3.91 Design
LC-113 0.63 Design
LC-114 56.45 Design
LC-115 5.52 Design
LC-116 4.25 Design
LC-117 0.96 Design
LC-118 56.79 Design
LC-200 0.70 Design
LC-201 0.95 Design
LC-202 0.89 Design
LC-203 0.72 Design
LC-204 1.93 Design
LC-205 0.72 Design
LC-206 52.60 Design
LC-207 0.31 Design
LC-208 1.53 Design
LC-209 0.31 Design
452
LC-210 52.20 Design
LC-211 2.57 Design
LC-212 2.00 Design
LC-213 0.52 Design
LC-214 25.64 Design
LC-215 2.77 Design
LC-216 2.19 Design
LC-217 0.72 Design
LC-218 25.84 Design
DESIGN CHECK
Brace - Directly welded Connection
Total weld design strength [kN] 619.24 97.05 LC-106-17 0.16 Eq. J2-4, Eq. J2-6
Maximum weld force that brace can develop [kN] 776.90 97.05 LC-106-17 0.12 Eq. J4-4
Gusset
Maximum weld force that gusset can develop [kN] 1741.48 97.05 LC-106-17 0.06 Eq. J4-4
Block shear on gusset [kN] 2059.75 97.05 LC-106-17 0.05 Eq. J4-5
Ratio 0.16
DESIGN CHECK
Brace
Gusset
Ratio 0.17
453
454

Lower left gusset interface - beam
Directly welded
DEMANDS
LC-1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 1.85 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 78.84 21.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.57 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.21 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 3.74 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 2.69 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 45.81 12.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.80 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 1.02 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.79 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.79 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 2.64 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 0.79 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 79.63 21.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
455
LC-107 0.51 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 2.36 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 0.51 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 79.36 21.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 4.26 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 3.21 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 0.51 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 46.33 12.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 4.53 1.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 3.48 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 0.79 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 46.60 12.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.57 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.78 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.73 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.59 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 1.59 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 0.59 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 43.16 11.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.26 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 1.26 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 0.26 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 42.83 11.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 2.11 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 1.64 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.43 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 21.04 5.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 2.27 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 1.80 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.59 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 21.20 5.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
DESIGN CHECK
Gusset
DG29, Eq. J4-1
Beam
Appendix B, DG29
Appendix B, DG29
Ratio 0.12
Lower left gusset interface - column

Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 0.00 8.46 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.76 0.02 -9.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 0.00 59.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 32.57 0.79 -112.82 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.24 0.01 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.09 0.00 -0.35 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -25.88 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 1.55 0.04 59.37 0.00 0.00 Design
456
LC-9 1.11 0.03 41.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 0.00 76.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 18.92 0.46 -7.92 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 0.33 0.01 -28.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 0.42 0.01 -37.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.33 0.01 -66.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.33 0.01 -16.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 1.09 0.03 -34.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 0.33 0.01 35.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 32.89 0.80 -137.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 0.21 0.01 -9.87 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 0.98 0.02 -28.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 0.21 0.01 41.40 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 32.78 0.80 -131.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 1.76 0.04 41.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 1.32 0.03 22.78 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 0.21 0.01 57.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 19.14 0.47 -26.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 1.87 0.05 21.81 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 1.44 0.04 3.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 0.33 0.01 38.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 19.25 0.47 -45.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 0.24 0.01 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.32 0.01 -46.61 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.30 0.01 -40.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.24 0.01 -10.97 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.66 0.02 -20.77 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 0.24 0.01 16.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 17.83 0.43 -76.47 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.11 0.00 -4.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.52 0.01 -14.39 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 0.11 0.00 23.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 17.69 0.43 -70.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 0.87 0.02 11.44 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.68 0.02 3.22 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 0.18 0.00 18.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 8.69 0.21 -18.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 0.94 0.02 11.17 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.74 0.02 2.96 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 0.24 0.01 18.66 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 8.76 0.21 -19.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Thickness [mm] 6.00 - 11.11 p. 10-102
Number of bolts 2 2.00 12.00 p 10-102
Length [mm] 177.80 158.90 177.80 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 3 3.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
457
Beam
Support
Ratio 0.30
458
459

Right beam interface - column
Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 0.00 0.09 8.46 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.00 0.22 -9.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 0.00 7.01 59.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 0.00 8.54 -112.82 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 -0.65 -0.09 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.00 0.01 -0.35 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -25.88 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.00 1.00 59.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.00 0.41 41.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 0.00 7.05 76.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 0.00 7.12 -7.92 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 -0.91 -0.13 -28.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 -0.78 -0.09 -37.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 -0.78 -0.11 -66.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 -0.78 -0.01 -16.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 -0.78 0.12 -34.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 -0.78 6.90 35.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 -0.78 8.44 -137.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 -0.59 0.01 -9.87 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 -0.59 0.14 -28.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 -0.59 6.93 41.40 0.00 0.00 Design
460
LC-110 -0.59 8.46 -131.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 -0.59 0.92 41.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 -0.59 0.33 22.78 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 -0.59 6.97 57.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 -0.59 7.04 -26.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 -0.78 0.90 21.81 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 -0.78 0.30 3.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 -0.78 6.95 38.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 -0.78 7.02 -45.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-200 -0.65 -0.09 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 -0.65 -0.08 -46.61 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 -0.65 -0.08 -40.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 -0.49 -0.01 -10.97 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 -0.49 0.06 -20.77 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 -0.49 3.72 16.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 -0.49 4.55 -76.47 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 -0.29 0.01 -4.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 -0.29 0.08 -14.39 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 -0.29 3.74 23.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 -0.29 4.57 -70.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 -0.49 0.38 11.44 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 -0.49 0.11 3.22 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 -0.49 3.10 18.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 -0.49 3.13 -18.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 -0.49 0.39 11.17 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 -0.49 0.12 2.96 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 -0.49 3.11 18.66 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 -0.49 3.14 -19.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Length [mm] 161.60 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 20 20.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
461
Support
Ratio 0.11
462
463

Left beam interface - column
Single plate
DEMANDS
kN kN kN kN*m kN*m
LC-1 -0.53 0.07 8.46 0.00 0.00 Design

LC-2 0.50 0.21 -9.67 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-3 -21.07 4.22 59.73 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-4 21.19 9.81 -112.82 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-5 0.81 0.15 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-6 0.06 0.01 -0.35 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-7 0.00 0.00 -25.88 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-8 0.15 0.94 59.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-9 0.31 0.37 41.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-10 -8.12 6.84 76.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-11 12.31 6.62 -7.92 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-100 1.13 0.22 -28.52 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-101 1.06 0.20 -37.95 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-102 0.99 0.19 -66.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-103 0.47 0.26 -16.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-104 1.49 0.40 -34.29 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-105 -20.08 4.41 35.11 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-106 22.18 10.00 -137.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-107 0.20 0.21 -9.87 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-108 1.22 0.35 -28.01 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-109 -20.35 4.36 41.40 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-110 21.91 9.95 -131.16 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-111 0.88 1.08 41.04 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-112 1.04 0.51 22.78 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-113 -7.39 6.98 57.68 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-114 13.04 6.76 -26.25 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-115 1.15 1.13 21.81 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-116 1.31 0.56 3.55 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-117 -7.12 7.03 38.45 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-118 13.31 6.81 -45.48 0.00 0.00 Design
464
LC-200 0.81 0.15 -20.37 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-201 0.86 0.16 -46.61 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-202 0.85 0.16 -40.05 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-203 0.36 0.16 -10.97 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-204 0.92 0.24 -20.77 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-205 -10.73 2.40 16.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-206 12.09 5.42 -76.47 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-207 0.08 0.11 -4.60 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-208 0.63 0.18 -14.39 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-209 -11.02 2.35 23.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-210 11.80 5.36 -70.09 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-211 0.67 0.54 11.44 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-212 0.74 0.28 3.22 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-213 -3.05 3.19 18.93 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-214 6.14 3.10 -18.84 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-215 0.72 0.55 11.17 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-216 0.79 0.29 2.96 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-217 -3.01 3.20 18.66 0.00 0.00 Design
LC-218 6.19 3.10 -19.11 0.00 0.00 Design
Shear plate
Length [mm] 161.60 87.38 174.75 p. 10-104
Beam
Support
Weld size [1/16in] 20 20.00 - p. 10-87
DESIGN CHECK
Shear plate
Beam
465
Support
Ratio 0.43
NOTES
The plate is designed with the conventional configuration criteria.
REFERENCES
[8] Dowswell, B., 2003, Connection Design For Steel Structures, Structural Design Solutions, LLC. Chapter 13, p. 14
466
APPENDIX E: BASE PLATE AND PEDESTAL DESIGN CHECK
E.1 Trade-off 1: Base Plate and Pedestal Design Check

________________________________________________________________________________________________
Connection name : Pinned BP

Connection ID : 1
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Family: Column - Base (CB)

Type: Base plate
Design code: AISC 360-16 LRFD, ACI 318-08
DEMANDS
Description Pu Mu22 Mu33 Vu2 Vu3 Load type
[kN] [kN*m] [kN*m] [kN] [kN]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -94.99 0.00 0.00 3.21 0.94 Design
LL -29.24 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.44 Design
Wx 99.73 0.00 0.00 38.63 0.02 Design
Wz 87.60 0.00 0.00 23.42 17.92 Design
EQx 32.97 0.00 0.00 22.79 0.61 Design
EQz 32.60 0.00 0.00 8.22 19.26 Design
D1 -132.99 0.00 0.00 4.50 1.32 Design
D2 -160.77 0.00 0.00 3.90 1.84 Design
D3 -128.61 0.00 0.00 3.87 1.35 Design
D4 -95.64 0.00 0.00 26.66 1.96 Design
D5 -96.01 0.00 0.00 12.09 20.61 Design
D7 -52.52 0.00 0.00 25.68 1.46 Design
D8 -52.90 0.00 0.00 11.11 20.11 Design
D9 14.24 0.00 0.00 41.52 0.87 Design
D10 2.11 0.00 0.00 26.31 18.77 Design
D11 -28.88 0.00 0.00 42.50 1.37 Design
D12 -41.01 0.00 0.00 27.29 19.27 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design for major axis

Base plate (AISC 360-16 LRFD)
Dimensions Unit Value Min. value Max. value Sta. References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from anchor to edge [mm] 50.48 6.35 --
Weld size [1/16in] 8 3 -- table J2.4

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/mm2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.05 DG1 3.1.1;
Base plate
Flexural yielding (bearing interface) [KN*m/m] 22.34 7.08 D2 0.32 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
Flexural yielding (tension interface) [KN*m/m] 22.34 9.90 Wx 0.44 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m] 2925.55 129.01 Wx 0.04 p. 8-9,
467
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic method weld shear capacity [KN/m] 1950.37 73.25 D11 0.04 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic method weld axial capacity [KN/m] 2925.55 109.07 Wx 0.04 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.44
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major axis
Anchors
Dimensions Unit Value Min. value Max. value Sta. References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [mm] 190.00 76.20 -- Sec. D.8.1
Concrete cover [mm] 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [mm] 512.38 -- 1487.62

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchor tension [KN] 117.33 16.62 Wx 0.14 Eq. D-3
Pullout of anchor in tension [KN] 68.43 16.62 Wx 0.24 Sec. D.4.1.1
Side-face blowout of anchor in tension [KN] 51.20 16.62 Wx 0.32 Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Sec. D.4.1.1
Side-face blowout of group of anchors in tension [KN] 161.36 33.24 Wx 0.21 Eq. D-17,
Sec. D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcement in tension [KN] 1396642.00 99.73 Wx 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Anchor shear [KN] 48.81 7.08 D11 0.15 Eq. D-20,
Sec. D.6.1.3
Pryout of anchor in shear [KN] 138.53 7.08 D11 0.05 Eq. D-4,
Sec. D.4.1.1
Pryout of group of anchors in shear [KN] 248.21 41.52 D9 0.17 Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcement in shear [KN] 596127.80 42.50 D11 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Interaction of tensile and shear forces [KN] 1.20 0.00 Wx 0.00 Eq. D-3,
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
468
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________________
Connection name : Pinned BP - HSS M

ember
Connection ID : 2
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
[kN] [kN*m ] [kN*m] [kN] [kN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -50.14 0.00 0.00 3.25 0.01 Design
LL -14.59 0.00 0.00 1.53 0.00 Design
Wx 54.09 0.00 0.00 0.03 1.39 Design
Wz 31.78 0.00 0.00 25.21 0.70 Design
EQx -1.99 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.91 Design
EQz 24.26 0.00 0.00 14.70 0.04 Design
D1 -70.20 0.00 0.00 4.55 0.02 Design
D2 -83.51 0.00 0.00 6.34 0.02 Design
D3 -67.47 0.00 0.00 4.66 0.02 Design
D4 -69.46 0.00 0.00 4.77 0.93 Design
D5 -43.20 0.00 0.00 19.36 0.06 Design
D7 -47.12 0.00 0.00 3.03 0.92 Design
D8 -20.87 0.00 0.00 17.62 0.05 Design
D9 8.96 0.00 0.00 2.96 1.40 Design
D10 -13.35 0.00 0.00 28.13 0.71 Design
D11 -13.37 0.00 0.00 4.70 1.40 Design
D12 -35.68 0.00 0.00 29.87 0.72 Design
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dimensions Unit Value in. value
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
Verification Unit Capacity Demand Ctrl EQ Ratio
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.02 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
Flexural yielding (bearing interface) [KN*m
/]m 22.34 5.30 D2 0.24 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
469
Flexural yielding (tension interface) [KN*m
/]m 22.34 6.39 Wx 0.29 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Colum
n
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 44.98 Wx 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
ethod weld shear capacity [KN/m
] 1950.37 41.30 D12 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
ethod weld axial capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 85.09 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pullout of anchor in tension [KN] 68.43 9.02 Wx 0.13 Sec.
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
ent in tension [KN] 1396642.00 54.09 Wx 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Pryout of group of anchors in shear [KN] 248.21 25.21 Wz 0.10 Eq. D-5,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
ent in shear [KN] 596127.80 29.87 D12 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
470
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________________

ember
Connection ID : 3
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
[kN] [kN*m ] [kN*m ] [kN] [kN]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -65.02 0.00 0.00 2.40 0.00 Design
LL -29.64 0.00 0.00 1.08 0.00 Design
Wx 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 Design
Wz 9.58 0.00 0.00 12.03 0.00 Design
EQx -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 Design
EQz -18.03 0.00 0.00 23.08 0.00 Design
D1 -91.03 0.00 0.00 3.36 0.00 Design
D2 -125.46 0.00 0.00 4.61 0.00 Design
D3 -92.85 0.00 0.00 3.42 0.00 Design
D4 -93.07 0.00 0.00 3.73 0.00 Design
D5 -110.88 0.00 0.00 26.50 0.00 Design
D7 -58.74 0.00 0.00 2.47 0.00 Design
D8 -76.55 0.00 0.00 25.24 0.00 Design
D9 -58.36 0.00 0.00 2.20 0.00 Design
D10 -48.94 0.00 0.00 14.19 0.00 Design
D11 -92.69 0.00 0.00 3.46 0.00 Design
D12 -83.27 0.00 0.00 15.46 0.00 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
471
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.04 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 8.44 D2 0.38 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 1.18 Wz 0.05 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 7.18 Wz 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 48.03 D5 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 16.22 Wz 0.01 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchor tension [KN] 117.33 1.60 Wz 0.01 Eq. D-3
Pullout of anchor in tension [KN] 68.43 1.60 Wz 0.02 Sec.
D.4.1.1
Side-face blowout of anchor in tension [KN] 51.20 1.60 Wz 0.03 Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Side-face blowout of group of anchors in tension [KN] 161.36 3.19 Wz 0.02 Eq. D-17,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
ent in tension [KN] 1396642.00 9.58 Wz 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
472
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

________________________________________________________________________________

Connection ID : 1
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -88.21 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.02 Design
LL -27.73 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.00 Design
Wx 100.78 0.00 0.00 31.47 2.03 Design
Wz 91.29 0.00 0.00 25.27 18.42 Design
EQx -29.27 0.00 0.00 22.28 1.25 Design
EQz -25.20 0.00 0.00 18.52 3.25 Design
D1 -123.50 0.00 0.00 4.10 0.03 Design
D2 -150.23 0.00 0.00 5.72 0.03 Design
D3 -119.72 0.00 0.00 4.21 0.03 Design
D4 -149.00 0.00 0.00 26.48 1.28 Design
D5 -144.92 0.00 0.00 22.72 3.28 Design
D7 -108.66 0.00 0.00 24.91 1.27 Design
D8 -104.59 0.00 0.00 21.16 3.27 Design
D9 21.39 0.00 0.00 34.10 2.05 Design
D10 11.89 0.00 0.00 27.91 18.44 Design
473
D11 -18.94 0.00 0.00 35.67 2.06 Design
D12 -28.44 0.00 0.00 29.48 18.45 Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.04 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 8.55 D2 0.38 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 10.96 Wx 0.49 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 93.48 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 61.28 D11 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 141.70 Wx 0.05 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Design for minor axis

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.04 DG1
3.1.1;
474
Base plate
/]m 22.34 8.55 D2 0.38 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 10.96 Wx 0.49 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 93.48 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 25.95 D12 0.01 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 141.70 Wx 0.05 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
475
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
476
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________________

ember
Connection ID : 2
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -9.33 0.00 0.00 1.24 0.00 Design
LL -0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Design
Wx 54.76 0.00 0.00 38.10 0.00 Design
Wz 28.42 0.00 0.00 21.24 11.74 Design
EQx -24.74 0.00 0.00 15.70 0.00 Design
EQz -0.28 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 Design
D1 -13.06 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.00 Design
D2 -11.24 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 Design
D3 -11.21 0.00 0.00 1.49 0.00 Design
D4 -35.94 0.00 0.00 17.19 0.00 Design
D5 -11.49 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.00 Design
D7 -33.13 0.00 0.00 16.82 0.00 Design
D8 -8.68 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 Design
D9 46.37 0.00 0.00 39.21 0.00 Design
D10 20.02 0.00 0.00 22.35 11.74 Design
D11 43.55 0.00 0.00 39.59 0.00 Design
D12 17.21 0.00 0.00 22.73 11.74 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
477
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D4 0.01 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 2.04 D4 0.09 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 5.95 Wx 0.27 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 47.31 Wx 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 79.04 D11 0.04 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 75.54 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
478
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ember
Connection ID : 3
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -65.14 0.00 0.00 2.04 0.00 Design
LL -29.92 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 Design
Wx 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 Design
Wz 6.01 0.00 0.00 6.51 0.00 Design
EQx -0.17 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 Design
EQz -10.60 0.00 0.00 11.79 0.00 Design
D1 -91.20 0.00 0.00 2.86 0.00 Design
D2 -126.04 0.00 0.00 3.92 0.00 Design
D3 -93.13 0.00 0.00 2.91 0.00 Design
D4 -93.30 0.00 0.00 3.14 0.00 Design
D5 -103.73 0.00 0.00 14.70 0.00 Design
D7 -58.80 0.00 0.00 2.07 0.00 Design
D8 -69.23 0.00 0.00 13.63 0.00 Design
D9 -58.46 0.00 0.00 1.86 0.00 Design
D10 -52.62 0.00 0.00 8.35 0.00 Design
479
D11 -92.96 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.00 Design
D12 -87.12 0.00 0.00 9.42 0.00 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.06 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 7.08 D2 0.32 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 0.56 Wz 0.02 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 8.66 Wz 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1462.77 26.69 D5 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2194.16 10.30 Wz 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 140.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
480
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connection name : Gusset BP

Connection ID : 4
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Gusset
Interface between Gusset - Top right brace

DEM
ANDS
Pu Description Load type
[kN]
---------------------------------------------
-1.67 DL Design
481
0.17 LL Design
0.33 Wx Design
39.79 Wz Design
1.53 EQx Design
62.91 EQz Design
-2.34 D1 Design
-1.73 D2 Design
-1.92 D3 Design
-0.39 D4 Design
60.99 D5 Design
0.02 D7 Design
61.41 D8 Design
-1.17 D9 Design
38.29 D10 Design
-1.59 D11 Design
37.88 D12 Design
---------------------------------------------
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
Transverse edge distance [m

]m 63.50 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
Longitudinal edge distance [mm

] 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
Longitudinal center-to-center spacing (pitch) [m

]m 70.00 50.80 190.50 Sec. J3.3,
Sec. J3.5
Gusset

]m 120.98 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
Longitudinal edge distance [m

]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
Bolts shear [KN] 159.26 62.91 EQz 0.40 Tables (7-
1..14)
Bolt bearing under shear load [KN] 217.00 62.91 EQz 0.29 Eq. J3-6
Block shear rupture at brace web [KN] 262.48 62.91 EQz 0.24 Eq. J4-5
Gusset
Bolt bearing on gusset [KN] 243.95 62.91 EQz 0.26 Eq. J3-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESIGN CHECK
References
482
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
em
Mber
Yielding strength due to axial load [KN] 606.51 62.91 EQz 0.10 Eq. J4-1
Tension rupture [KN] 358.66 62.91 EQz 0.18 Eq. J4-2
Gusset
Tension yielding on the Whitmore section [KN] 180.56 62.91 EQz 0.35 Eq. J4-1
Buckling on the Whitmore section [KN] 172.94 2.34 D1 0.01 Eq. E3-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right gusset interface - base plate

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
[kN] [kN] [kN*m ] [kN] [kN*m ] [kN*m]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -1.36 -0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LL 0.14 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 0.27 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 32.47 4.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx 1.25 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz 51.34 7.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 -1.91 -0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 -1.41 -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 -1.56 -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 -0.32 -0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 49.77 7.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 50.11 7.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 -0.96 -0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 31.25 4.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 -1.30 -0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 30.91 4.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 624.66 7.34 EQz 0.01 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
Shear yielding [KN] 416.44 51.34 EQz 0.12 Eq. J4-3
Gusset edge tension stress [KN/m
m
2] 0.22 0.00 EQz 0.01 J4-1
Gusset edge shear stress [KN/m
m
2] 0.15 0.02 EQz 0.12 J4-1
Weld capacity [KN] 839.86 64.82 EQz 0.08 Tables 8-
4 .. 8-11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upper right gusset interface - column

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum
n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
[kN] [kN] [kN*m
] [kN] [kN*m
] [kN*m
]
483
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -0.71 -0.04 0.00 -22.59 0.00 0.00 Design
LL 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.22 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 0.14 0.01 0.00 62.03 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 17.03 0.90 0.00 76.15 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx 0.65 0.03 0.00 -8.73 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz 26.92 1.42 0.00 63.39 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 -1.00 -0.05 0.00 -31.63 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 -0.74 -0.04 0.00 -27.47 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 -0.82 -0.04 0.00 -27.22 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 -0.17 -0.01 0.00 -35.95 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 26.10 1.38 0.00 36.16 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 0.01 0.00 0.00 -29.06 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 26.28 1.39 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 -0.50 -0.03 0.00 41.69 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 16.39 0.87 0.00 55.82 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 -0.68 -0.04 0.00 34.80 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 16.21 0.86 0.00 48.93 0.00 0.00 Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 327.54 1.42 EQz 0.00 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
Shear yielding [KN] 218.36 26.92 EQz 0.12 Eq. J4-3
m
2] 0.22 0.00 EQz 0.00 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.02 EQz 0.12 J4-1
Weld capacity [KN] 431.55 33.69 EQz 0.08 Tables 8-
4 .. 8-11
Column
Web plate strength due out-of-plane transverse load [KN] 70.34 1.42 EQz 0.02 p.9-16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
interface between Column - base plate

DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -23.50 0.03 0.00 2.85 1.40 Design
LL -0.13 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.14 Design
Wx 62.20 -0.01 0.00 31.48 -0.27 Design
Wz 97.83 -0.67 0.00 22.12 -33.31 Design
EQx -7.90 -0.03 0.00 5.93 -1.28 Design
EQz 97.65 -1.06 0.00 4.78 -52.73 Design
D1 -32.90 0.04 0.00 3.99 1.96 Design
D2 -28.41 0.03 0.00 3.46 1.45 Design
D3 -28.27 0.03 0.00 3.43 1.61 Design
D4 -36.16 0.01 0.00 9.36 0.33 Design
D5 69.38 -1.02 0.00 8.21 -51.12 Design
D7 -29.05 0.00 0.00 8.50 -0.02 Design
D8 76.50 -1.03 0.00 7.34 -51.47 Design
D9 41.05 0.02 0.00 34.05 0.99 Design
D10 76.68 -0.64 0.00 24.68 -32.05 Design
484
D11 33.94 0.03 0.00 34.91 1.34 Design
D12 69.56 -0.64 0.00 25.55 -31.70 Design
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dimensions Unit Value in. va lue
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

Right gusset

WARNINGS
- Gussets do not fit in plate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D4 0.01 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 2.07 D4 0.09 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13,
DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 16.63 EQz 0.74 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Right gusset
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 0.00 DL 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Colum
n
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 103.19 EQz 0.04 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.74
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 380.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
485
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchor tension [KN] 117.33 25.80 EQz 0.22 Eq. D-3
Pullout of anchor in tension [KN] 68.43 25.80 EQz 0.38 Sec.
D.4.1.1
Side-face blowout of anchor in tension [KN] 51.20 25.80 EQz 0.50 Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Side-face blowout of group of anchors in tension [KN] 161.36 51.60 EQz 0.32 Eq. D-17,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Anchor shear [KN] 48.81 13.18 EQz 0.27 Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Pryout of anchor in shear [KN] 138.53 13.18 EQz 0.10 Eq. D-4,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Pryout of group of anchors in shear [KN] 234.86 52.73 EQz 0.22 Eq. D-5,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
ent in shear [KN] 596127.80 52.73 EQz 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Interaction of tensile and shear forces [KN] 1.20 0.77 EQz 0.65 Eq. D-3,
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Eq. D-32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.74
486
________________________________________________________________________________

Connection ID : 5
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Gusset

DEM
ANDS
[kN]
----------------------------------------------
-1.49 DL Design
-0.09 LL Design
0.60 Wx Design
29.08 Wz Design
-4.06 EQx Design
-66.52 EQz Design
-2.09 D1 Design
-1.93 D2 Design
-1.83 D3 Design
-5.89 D4 Design
-68.35 D5 Design
-5.40 D7 Design
-67.86 D8 Design
-0.74 D9 Design
27.74 D10 Design
-1.23 D11 Design
27.25 D12 Design
----------------------------------------------
Dimensions Unit Value in.
M value ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted

]m 63.50 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5

]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5

]m 70.00 50.80 190.50 Sec. J3.3,
Sec. J3.5
Gusset

]m 120.98 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5

]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
487
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
Bolts shear [KN] 159.26 68.35 D5 0.43 Tables (7-
1..14)
Bolt bearing under shear load [KN] 217.00 68.35 D5 0.31 Eq. J3-6
Block shear rupture at brace web [KN] 262.48 29.08 Wz 0.11 Eq. J4-5
Gusset
Bolt bearing on gusset [KN] 243.95 68.35 D5 0.28 Eq. J3-6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
em
Mber
Yielding strength due to axial load [KN] 606.51 29.08 Wz 0.05 Eq. J4-1
Tension rupture [KN] 358.66 29.08 Wz 0.08 Eq. J4-2
Gusset
Tension yielding on the Whitmore section [KN] 180.56 29.08 Wz 0.16 Eq. J4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -1.22 -0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LL -0.07 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 0.49 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 23.75 3.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx -3.31 -0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz -54.33 -7.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 -1.70 -0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 -1.58 -0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 -1.50 -0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 -4.81 -0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 -55.83 -7.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 -4.41 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 -55.43 -7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 -0.60 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 22.66 3.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 -1.00 -0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 22.26 3.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 624.94 7.98 D5 0.01 Eq. B-1,
488
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
Shear yielding [KN] 416.63 55.83 D5 0.13 Eq. J4-3
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.01 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.02 D5 0.13 J4-1
Weld capacity [KN] 840.23 70.50 D5 0.08 Tables 8-
4 .. 8-11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -0.64 -0.03 0.00 -10.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LL -0.04 0.00 0.00 -0.06 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 0.26 0.01 0.00 54.71 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 12.44 0.64 0.00 29.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx -1.74 -0.09 0.00 33.37 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz -28.46 -1.46 0.00 1.66 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 -0.89 -0.05 0.00 -14.67 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 -0.83 -0.04 0.00 -12.67 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 -0.78 -0.04 0.00 -12.60 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 -2.52 -0.13 0.00 20.77 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 -29.24 -1.50 0.00 -10.95 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 -2.31 -0.12 0.00 23.94 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 -29.03 -1.48 0.00 -7.77 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 -0.31 -0.02 0.00 45.28 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 11.87 0.61 0.00 19.57 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 -0.53 -0.03 0.00 42.11 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 11.66 0.60 0.00 16.39 0.00 0.00 Design
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 327.36 1.50 D5 0.00 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.00 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.02 D5 0.13 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
Column
Web plate strength due out-of-plane transverse load [KN] 67.67 1.50 D5 0.02 p.9-16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
489
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -11.29 0.02 0.00 1.37 1.25 Design
LL -0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 Design
Wx 55.04 -0.01 0.00 37.05 -0.51 Design
Wz 44.84 -0.49 0.00 21.95 -24.39 Design
EQx 31.16 0.07 0.00 20.85 3.40 Design
EQz -34.57 1.12 0.00 1.86 55.79 Design
D1 -15.81 0.03 0.00 1.92 1.75 Design
D2 -13.72 0.03 0.00 1.68 1.62 Design
D3 -13.60 0.03 0.00 1.66 1.54 Design
D4 17.56 0.10 0.00 22.51 4.94 Design
D5 -48.17 1.15 0.00 3.52 57.32 Design
D7 21.00 0.09 0.00 22.09 4.53 Design
D8 -44.73 1.14 0.00 3.10 56.91 Design
D9 44.88 0.01 0.00 38.29 0.62 Design
D10 34.67 -0.47 0.00 23.18 -23.27 Design
D11 41.44 0.02 0.00 38.71 1.03 Design
D12 31.23 -0.46 0.00 23.61 -22.85 Design
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --

Right gusset

WARNINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D5 0.02 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 2.50 D5 0.11 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13,
DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 8.86 Wx 0.40 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Right gusset
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 0.00 DL 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Colum
n
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 55.11 Wx 0.02 p. 8-9,
490
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 380.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
491
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
________________________________________________________________________________

Connection ID : 5
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Gusset

DEM
ANDS
[kN]
----------------------------------------------
-1.49 DL Design
-0.09 LL Design
0.60 Wx Design
29.08 Wz Design
-4.06 EQx Design
-66.52 EQz Design
-2.09 D1 Design
-1.93 D2 Design
-1.83 D3 Design
-5.89 D4 Design
-68.35 D5 Design
-5.40 D7 Design
-67.86 D8 Design
-0.74 D9 Design
27.74 D10 Design
-1.23 D11 Design
27.25 D12 Design
----------------------------------------------
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
]m 63.50 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 70.00 50.80 190.50 Sec. J3.3,
Sec. J3.5
Gusset
]m 120.98 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
492
]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
1..14)
Block shear rupture at brace web [KN] 262.48 29.08 Wz 0.11 Eq. J4-5
Gusset
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
em
Mber
Yielding strength due to axial load [KN] 606.51 29.08 Wz 0.05 Eq. J4-1
Tension rupture [KN] 358.66 29.08 Wz 0.08 Eq. J4-2
Gusset
Tension yielding on the Whitmore section [KN] 180.56 29.08 Wz 0.16 Eq. J4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -1.22 -0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LL -0.07 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 0.49 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 23.75 3.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx -3.31 -0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz -54.33 -7.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 -1.70 -0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 -1.58 -0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 -1.50 -0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 -4.81 -0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 -55.83 -7.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 -4.41 -0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 -55.43 -7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 -0.60 -0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 22.66 3.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 -1.00 -0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 22.26 3.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
493
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 624.94 7.98 D5 0.01 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.01 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.02 D5 0.13 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -0.64 -0.03 0.00 -10.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LL -0.04 0.00 0.00 -0.06 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 0.26 0.01 0.00 54.71 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 12.44 0.64 0.00 29.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx -1.74 -0.09 0.00 33.37 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz -28.46 -1.46 0.00 1.66 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 -0.89 -0.05 0.00 -14.67 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 -0.83 -0.04 0.00 -12.67 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 -0.78 -0.04 0.00 -12.60 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 -2.52 -0.13 0.00 20.77 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 -29.24 -1.50 0.00 -10.95 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 -2.31 -0.12 0.00 23.94 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 -29.03 -1.48 0.00 -7.77 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 -0.31 -0.02 0.00 45.28 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 11.87 0.61 0.00 19.57 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 -0.53 -0.03 0.00 42.11 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 11.66 0.60 0.00 16.39 0.00 0.00 Design
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 327.36 1.50 D5 0.00 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.00 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.02 D5 0.13 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
Column
494
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -11.29 0.02 0.00 1.37 1.25 Design
LL -0.11 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.07 Design
Wx 55.04 -0.01 0.00 37.05 -0.51 Design
Wz 44.84 -0.49 0.00 21.95 -24.39 Design
EQx 31.16 0.07 0.00 20.85 3.40 Design
EQz -34.57 1.12 0.00 1.86 55.79 Design
D1 -15.81 0.03 0.00 1.92 1.75 Design
D2 -13.72 0.03 0.00 1.68 1.62 Design
D3 -13.60 0.03 0.00 1.66 1.54 Design
D4 17.56 0.10 0.00 22.51 4.94 Design
D5 -48.17 1.15 0.00 3.52 57.32 Design
D7 21.00 0.09 0.00 22.09 4.53 Design
D8 -44.73 1.14 0.00 3.10 56.91 Design
D9 44.88 0.01 0.00 38.29 0.62 Design
D10 34.67 -0.47 0.00 23.18 -23.27 Design
D11 41.44 0.02 0.00 38.71 1.03 Design
D12 31.23 -0.46 0.00 23.61 -22.85 Design
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
Right gusset
WARNINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D5 0.02 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 2.50 D5 0.11 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13,
DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 8.86 Wx 0.40 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Right gusset
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 0.00 DL 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
495
Sec. J2.4
Colum
n
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 55.11 Wx 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 380.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
496
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40

________________________________________________________________________________

Connection ID : 1
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -86.40 0.00 0.00 2.94 0.02 Design
LL -27.78 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.00 Design
Wx 100.72 0.00 0.00 31.47 2.03 Design
Wz 90.72 0.00 0.00 25.27 18.38 Design
EQx 28.20 0.00 0.00 22.23 1.27 Design
EQz -23.53 0.00 0.00 18.69 3.35 Design
D1 -120.96 0.00 0.00 4.11 0.03 Design
D2 -148.12 0.00 0.00 5.73 0.03 Design
D3 -117.57 0.00 0.00 4.21 0.03 Design
D4 -89.36 0.00 0.00 26.44 1.30 Design
D5 -141.09 0.00 0.00 22.90 3.38 Design
D7 -49.56 0.00 0.00 24.87 1.29 Design
D8 -101.28 0.00 0.00 21.33 3.37 Design
D9 22.96 0.00 0.00 34.11 2.05 Design
D10 12.96 0.00 0.00 27.92 18.40 Design
D11 -16.85 0.00 0.00 35.68 2.06 Design
D12 -26.85 0.00 0.00 29.49 18.41 Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax.
M value Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
497
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.04 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 8.43 D2 0.38 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 10.95 Wx 0.49 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 93.42 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 61.29 D11 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 141.61 Wx 0.05 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.04 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 8.43 D2 0.38 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 10.95 Wx 0.49 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 93.42 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 25.89 D12 0.01 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 141.61 Wx 0.05 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
498
Ratio 0.49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
499
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.33
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
500
________________________________________________________________________________

ember
Connection ID : 2
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -9.33 0.00 0.00 1.24 0.00 Design
LL -0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Design
Wx 54.76 0.00 0.00 38.10 0.00 Design
Wz 28.42 0.00 0.00 21.24 11.74 Design
EQx -25.10 0.00 0.00 15.93 0.00 Design
EQz -0.28 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 Design
D1 -13.06 0.00 0.00 1.73 0.00 Design
D2 -11.24 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 Design
D3 -11.21 0.00 0.00 1.49 0.00 Design
D4 -36.30 0.00 0.00 17.42 0.00 Design
D5 -11.49 0.00 0.00 1.68 0.00 Design
D7 -33.49 0.00 0.00 17.04 0.00 Design
D8 -8.68 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 Design
D9 46.37 0.00 0.00 39.21 0.00 Design
D10 20.02 0.00 0.00 22.35 11.74 Design
D11 43.55 0.00 0.00 39.59 0.00 Design
D12 17.21 0.00 0.00 22.73 11.74 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D4 0.01 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 2.06 D4 0.09 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 5.95 Wx 0.27 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 47.31 Wx 0.02 p. 8-9,
501
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1950.37 79.04 D11 0.04 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2925.55 75.54 Wx 0.03 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
Dimensions Unit Value in.
M value ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
502
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________________

ember
Connection ID : 3
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Base plate
DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -65.15 0.00 0.00 2.05 0.00 Design
LL -29.92 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 Design
Wx 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 Design
Wz 6.15 0.00 0.00 6.72 0.00 Design
EQx -0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 Design
EQz -11.06 0.00 0.00 12.41 0.00 Design
D1 -91.21 0.00 0.00 2.87 0.00 Design
D2 -126.06 0.00 0.00 3.93 0.00 Design
D3 -93.14 0.00 0.00 2.92 0.00 Design
D4 -93.33 0.00 0.00 3.17 0.00 Design
D5 -104.21 0.00 0.00 15.33 0.00 Design
D7 -58.82 0.00 0.00 2.09 0.00 Design
D8 -69.70 0.00 0.00 14.26 0.00 Design
D9 -58.47 0.00 0.00 1.87 0.00 Design
D10 -52.49 0.00 0.00 8.57 0.00 Design
D11 -92.98 0.00 0.00 2.95 0.00 Design
D12 -86.99 0.00 0.00 9.64 0.00 Design
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
503
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D2 0.04 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 8.54 D2 0.38 DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 0.76 Wz 0.03 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Column
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 4.53 Wz 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
Elastic m
] 1462.77 27.84 D5 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Elastic m
] 2194.16 10.55 Wz 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mjor axis
a
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 190.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
e nt in tension [KN] 1396642.00 6.15 Wz 0.00 Sec.
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.6.1.3
504
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.05
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________________

Connection ID : 4
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Gusset

DEM
ANDS
[kN]
---------------------------------------------
0.85 DL Design
0.26 LL Design
4.57 Wx Design
55.83 Wz Design
2.30 EQx Design
96.08 EQz Design
1.18 D1 Design
1.43 D2 Design
1.14 D3 Design
3.44 D4 Design
97.22 D5 Design
3.06 D7 Design
96.84 D8 Design
5.33 D9 Design
56.59 D10 Design
5.71 D11 Design
56.97 D12 Design
505
---------------------------------------------
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
]m 76.20 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 70.00 50.80 190.50 Sec. J3.3,
Sec. J3.5
Gusset
]m 129.23 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
1..14)
Block shear rupture at brace web [KN] 296.37 97.22 D5 0.33 Eq. J4-5
Gusset
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.61
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
em
Mber
Yielding strength due to axial load [KN] 734.62 97.22 D5 0.13 Eq. J4-1
Tension rupture [KN] 441.93 97.22 D5 0.22 Eq. J4-2
Gusset
Tension yielding on the Whitmore section [KN] 180.56 97.22 D5 0.54 Eq. J4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
[kN] [kN] [kN*m] [kN] [kN*m] [kN*m ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
506
DL 0.67 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LL 0.21 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 3.64 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 44.51 6.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx 1.83 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz 76.60 10.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 0.94 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 1.14 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 0.91 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 2.74 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 77.51 10.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 2.44 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 77.21 10.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 4.25 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 45.12 6.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 4.55 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 45.42 6.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 630.45 10.99 D5 0.02 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.02 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.03 D5 0.18 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
[kN] [kN] [kN*m] [kN] [kN*m] [kN*m ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL 0.39 0.02 0.00 -22.48 0.00 0.00 Design
LL 0.12 0.01 0.00 -0.35 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 2.10 0.10 0.00 60.09 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 25.71 1.22 0.00 76.02 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx 1.06 0.05 0.00 -9.67 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz 44.25 2.10 0.00 -112.82 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 0.54 0.03 0.00 -31.47 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 0.66 0.03 0.00 -27.53 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 0.53 0.03 0.00 -27.15 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 1.59 0.08 0.00 -36.82 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 44.78 2.13 0.00 -139.97 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 1.41 0.07 0.00 -29.90 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 44.60 2.12 0.00 -133.05 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 2.45 0.12 0.00 39.86 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 26.06 1.24 0.00 55.79 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 2.63 0.12 0.00 32.94 0.00 0.00 Design
507
D12 26.24 1.25 0.00 48.87 0.00 0.00 Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 364.21 2.13 D5 0.01 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.01 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.03 D5 0.18 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
Column
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
[kN] [kN*m] [kN*m ] [kN] [kN]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -21.99 -0.01 0.00 2.60 -0.69 Design
LL -0.20 0.00 0.00 0.03 -0.21 Design
Wx 62.71 -0.07 0.00 31.47 -3.74 Design
Wz 108.04 -0.91 0.00 22.11 -45.66 Design
EQx -8.35 -0.04 0.00 5.81 -1.88 Design
EQz -57.71 -1.57 0.00 4.61 -78.62 Design
D1 -30.79 -0.02 0.00 3.64 -0.97 Design
D2 -26.72 -0.02 0.00 3.16 -1.17 Design
D3 -26.49 -0.02 0.00 3.13 -0.94 Design
D4 -34.84 -0.06 0.00 8.94 -2.82 Design
D5 -84.21 -1.59 0.00 7.74 -79.56 Design
D7 -28.14 -0.05 0.00 8.15 -2.50 Design
D8 -77.51 -1.59 0.00 6.95 -79.24 Design
D9 42.91 -0.09 0.00 33.81 -4.36 Design
D10 88.24 -0.93 0.00 24.45 -46.28 Design
D11 36.21 -0.09 0.00 34.60 -4.67 Design
D12 81.55 -0.93 0.00 25.24 -46.60 Design
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
Right gusset
WARNINGS
508
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D5 0.03 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 5.19 D5 0.23 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13,
DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 18.18 Wz 0.81 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Right gusset
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 0.00 DL 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Colum
n
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 112.84 Wz 0.04 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.81
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 380.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
509
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Interaction of tensile and shear forces [KN] 1.20 0.78 Wz 0.65 Eq. D-3,
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Eq. D-32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.81
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________________

Connection ID : 5
________________________________________________________________________________
Fam
ily: Colum
n - Base (CB)
Type: Gusset

DEM
ANDS
[kN]
---------------------------------------------
0.70 DL Design
0.13 LL Design
5.06 Wx Design
41.13 Wz Design
5.10 EQx Design
93.58 EQz Design
0.98 D1 Design
1.04 D2 Design
0.90 D3 Design
6.00 D4 Design
94.48 D5 Design
5.73 D7 Design
94.21 D8 Design
5.69 D9 Design
41.76 D10 Design
5.96 D11 Design
510
42.03 D12 Design
---------------------------------------------
M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
]m 76.20 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 70.00 50.80 190.50 Sec. J3.3,
Sec. J3.5
Gusset
]m 129.23 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
]m 40.00 25.40 -- Tables
J3.4,
J3.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directly bolted
1..14)
Block shear rupture at brace web [KN] 296.37 94.48 D5 0.32 Eq. J4-5
Gusset
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.59
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
em
Mber
Yielding strength due to axial load [KN] 734.62 94.48 D5 0.13 Eq. J4-1
Tension rupture [KN] 441.93 94.48 D5 0.21 Eq. J4-2
Gusset
Tension yielding on the Whitmore section [KN] 180.56 94.48 D5 0.52 Eq. J4-1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Column
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
[kN] [kN] [kN*m
] [kN] [kN*m
] [kN*m
]
511
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL 0.56 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
LL 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 4.04 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 32.82 4.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx 4.07 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz 74.68 10.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 0.78 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 0.83 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 0.72 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 4.79 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 75.40 10.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 4.57 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 75.18 10.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 4.54 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 33.32 4.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D11 4.76 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 33.54 4.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Design
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 630.73 10.68 D5 0.02 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.02 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.03 D5 0.18 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directly welded
DEM
ANDS
Beam Colum n
Description Ru Pu M
u Pu u22
M u33
M Load type
[kN] [kN] [kN*m] [kN] [kN*m ] [kN*m ]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL 0.32 0.01 0.00 -10.71 0.00 0.00 Design
LL 0.06 0.00 0.00 -0.08 0.00 0.00 Design
Wx 2.33 0.11 0.00 52.45 0.00 0.00 Design
Wz 18.94 0.87 0.00 27.94 0.00 0.00 Design
EQx 2.35 0.11 0.00 -35.11 0.00 0.00 Design
EQz 43.10 1.98 0.00 -54.77 0.00 0.00 Design
D1 0.45 0.02 0.00 -14.99 0.00 0.00 Design
D2 0.48 0.02 0.00 -12.97 0.00 0.00 Design
D3 0.42 0.02 0.00 -12.89 0.00 0.00 Design
D4 2.76 0.13 0.00 -48.00 0.00 0.00 Design
D5 43.51 2.00 0.00 -67.66 0.00 0.00 Design
D7 2.64 0.12 0.00 -44.75 0.00 0.00 Design
D8 43.39 2.00 0.00 -64.41 0.00 0.00 Design
D9 2.62 0.12 0.00 42.81 0.00 0.00 Design
D10 19.23 0.88 0.00 18.31 0.00 0.00 Design
512
D11 2.75 0.13 0.00 39.56 0.00 0.00 Design
D12 19.36 0.89 0.00 15.06 0.00 0.00 Design
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gusset
Beam yielding (norm
al stress) [KN] 364.01 2.00 D5 0.01 Eq. B-1,
Appendix
B,
DG29,
Eq. J4-1
m
2] 0.22 0.00 D5 0.01 J4-1
m
2] 0.15 0.03 D5 0.18 J4-1
4 .. 8-11
Column
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DEM
ANDS
Description Pu u22
M u33
M Vu2 Vu3 Load type
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DL -10.31 -0.01 0.00 1.31 -0.57 Design
LL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 -0.11 Design
Wx 55.35 -0.08 0.00 37.05 -4.15 Design
Wz 51.53 -0.67 0.00 21.97 -33.69 Design
EQx -32.19 -0.08 0.00 20.23 -4.18 Design
EQz -1.09 -1.53 0.00 1.85 -76.66 Design
D1 -14.43 -0.02 0.00 1.84 -0.80 Design
D2 -12.37 -0.02 0.00 1.61 -0.86 Design
D3 -12.37 -0.01 0.00 1.59 -0.74 Design
D4 -44.55 -0.10 0.00 21.82 -4.92 Design
D5 -13.46 -1.55 0.00 3.44 -77.40 Design
D7 -41.46 -0.09 0.00 21.41 -4.69 Design
D8 -10.37 -1.54 0.00 3.04 -77.17 Design
D9 46.08 -0.09 0.00 38.23 -4.66 Design
D10 42.26 -0.68 0.00 23.15 -34.20 Design
D11 42.98 -0.10 0.00 38.64 -4.89 Design
D12 39.17 -0.69 0.00 23.55 -34.43 Design
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

M ax. value
M Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base plate
Distance from
anchor to edge [m
]m 50.48 6.35 --
Right gusset
513
WARNINGS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedestal
Axial bearing [KN/m
m
2] 0.01 0.00 D4 0.01 DG1
3.1.1;
Base plate
/]m 22.34 2.53 D4 0.11 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13,
DG1 Sec
3.1.2
/]m 22.34 8.91 Wx 0.40 DG1 Eq.
3.3.13
Right gusset
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2194.16 0.00 DL 0.00 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4
Colum
n
Weld capacity [KN/m
] 2925.55 55.42 Wx 0.02 p. 8-9,
Sec. J2.5,
Sec. J2.4,
DG1 p. 35
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
iM
nor axis
Anchors
M ax.
M value Sta.
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anchors
Anchor spacing [m
]m 380.00 76.20 -- Sec.
D.8.1
Concrete cover [m
]m 100.47 50.80 -- Sec. 7.7.1
Effective length [m
]m 512.38 -- 1487.62
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DESIGN CHECK
References
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D.4.1.1
D.5.4.1,
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
514
Sec.
D.6.1.3
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Sec.
D.4.1.1
Anchors reinforcem
D.5.2.9,
D.6.2.9
Interaction of tensile and shear forces [KN] 1.20 0.00 LL 0.00 Eq. D-3,
Sec.
D.4.1.1,
Sec.
D.5.4.1,
Eq. D-17,
Eq. D-20,
Sec.
D.6.1.3,
Eq. D-4,
Eq. D-5,
Sec. D.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratio 0.40
515
APPENDIX F: FOOTING DESIGN CHECK
F.1 Trade-off 1: Footing Design Check
516
Design Calculations
Footing Size
Initial
Length 1.00 m
(Lo) =
Initial 1.00 m
Width
(Wo) =
Load Combination/s- Service Stress Level

Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Combination Load Combination Title Combination
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
a - Value specified in the Load Safety Factor table
b - Value specified in the Pile/Soil Bearing Capacity Factors table
c - Value specified in the Apply Self Weight and Dead Weight Factor table
200 DL 1.00 1.00 1.00
201 DL+FLL+RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
202 DL+0.75FLL+0.75RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
203 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+X)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
204 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-X)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
205 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+Z)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
206 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-Z)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
207 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
208 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
209 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
210 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
211 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
212 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
213 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
214 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
215 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
216 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
517
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
217 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
218 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Load Combination/s- Strength Level
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
100 1.4DL 1.00 1.00 1.00
101 1.2DL+1.6FLL+0.5RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
103 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
104 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
107 0.9DL+1.0EQ(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
108 0.9DL+1.0EQ(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
109 0.9DL+1.0EQ(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
110 0.9DL+1.0EQ(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
111 0.9DL+1.0WL(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
112 0.9DL+1.0WL(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
113 0.9DL+1.0WL(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
114 0.9DL+1.0WL(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
115 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
116 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
117 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
118 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
518
Applied Loads on Top of Pedestal
Before consideration of self-weight and load safety factor table
Moments are about the center of footing / pile cap (does not include moments caused by lateral loads)
For the loads shown in this table, the sign convention is the same as that for JOINT LOADS in STAAD.Pro
when global Y is the vertical axis.
Applied Loads from Column - Service Stress Level

Fy
(kN)
Fx Downwards is Fz Mx Mz
Load Case
(kN) negative (kN) (kNm) (kNm)
Upwards is
positive
200 1.37 -49.63 -0.09 -0.09 -2.00
201 3.80 -87.87 -0.13 -0.13 -5.60
202 3.19 -78.31 -0.12 -0.12 -4.70
203 5.83 -28.60 -0.07 -0.07 -8.68
204 -3.78 -45.97 -0.13 -0.13 5.70
205 1.04 -38.65 7.40 8.44 -1.57
206 1.02 -35.92 -7.61 -8.64 -1.43
207 5.42 -13.65 -0.01 -0.01 -8.08
208 -4.19 -31.01 -0.07 -0.07 6.30
209 0.63 -23.69 7.46 8.50 -0.97
210 0.61 -20.96 -7.55 -8.58 -0.83
211 7.35 7.66 -0.07 -0.07 -10.89
212 -3.18 -9.57 -0.07 -0.06 4.76
213 2.57 -15.32 2.88 3.29 -3.81
214 5.40 1.68 -3.04 -3.45 -7.97
215 7.35 7.59 -0.10 -0.10 -10.89
216 -3.18 -9.63 -0.10 -0.10 4.76
217 2.57 -15.38 2.85 3.25 -3.80
218 5.40 1.62 -3.07 -3.48 -7.97
519
Applied Loads from Column - Strength Level
Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
100 1.92 -69.48 -0.13 -0.12 -2.80
101 2.86 -78.77 -0.17 -0.17 -4.20
102 5.53 -120.64 -0.13 -0.12 -8.17
103 10.54 -43.52 -0.08 -0.07 -15.70
104 -7.25 -75.67 -0.19 -0.18 10.93
105 1.67 -62.12 13.76 15.69 -2.53
106 1.63 -57.06 -14.03 -15.95 -2.28
107 10.12 -28.58 -0.03 -0.02 -15.10
108 -7.66 -60.74 -0.14 -0.14 11.53
109 1.26 -47.19 13.81 15.73 -1.93
110 1.22 -42.13 -13.99 -15.90 -1.68
111 15.28 55.07 -0.09 -0.09 -22.67
112 -8.12 16.79 -0.08 -0.08 12.12
113 4.67 4.01 6.47 7.37 -6.93
114 10.94 41.78 -6.69 -7.60 -16.19
115 16.90 21.06 -0.14 -0.13 -25.07
116 -6.49 -17.22 -0.13 -0.12 9.72
117 6.29 -30.00 6.42 7.32 -9.33
118 12.57 7.77 -6.74 -7.64 -18.59
Min. area required from

= 1.30 m2
bearing pressure, Amin
520
Note: Amin is an initial estimation considering self-weight, axial load and moment against factored bearing capacity.
Final Footing Size
Length (L2) = 2.02 m Governing Load Case : # 111

Width (W2) = 2.02 m Governing Load Case : # 111
Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 4.06 m2
Soil Weight On Top Of Footing = 55.56 kN
Pressures at 4 Corners
Please note that pressures values displayed in tables below are calculated after dividing by soil bearing
factor
Pressure at Pressure at Pressure at

Pressure at Area of footing in
Load Case / top right bottom right bottom left
top left corner uplift (Au)
Combination corner corner corner
(kN/m2) (m2)
(kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609 0.00
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609 0.00
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609 0.00
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609 0.00
If Au is zero, there is no uplift and no pressure adjustment is necessary. Otherwise, to account for uplift,
areas of negative pressure will be set to zero and the pressure will be redistributed to remaining corners.
521
Summary of Adjusted Pressures at four Corners
Pressure at
Pressure at top Pressure at top bottom right Pressure at bottom
Load Case / left corner right corner corner left corner
Combination (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609
201 55.9040 65.7775 65.5344 55.6609
Stability Check
Passive Earth Pressure Resistance

Resisting Force Along X on Pedestal : 4.50 kN
Resisting Force Along Z on Pedestal : 4.50 kN
Resisting Force Along X on Footing : 10.43 kN
Resisting Force Along Z on Footing : 10.43 kN
Resisting moment about X on Pedestal : 2.83 kNm
Resisting moment about Z on pedestal : 2.83 kNm
Resisting moment about X on Footing : 1.50 kNm
Resisting moment about Z on Footing : 1.50 kNm
Factor of safety against

- Factor of safety against sliding
overturning
Load
Along X- Along Z- Required About X- About Z- Required
Case Resultant
Direction Direction FOS Direction Direction FOS
No.
200 40.95 622.08 40.86 1.50 776.66 36.37 1.50
201 19.85 576.56 19.83 1.50 760.25 18.72 1.50
202 22.12 585.09 22.10 1.50 763.28 20.60 1.50
203 7.85 657.16 7.85 1.50 762.20 6.37 1.50
204 14.41 419.34 14.40 1.50 503.84 12.29 1.50
522
overturning
Load
Case Resultant
No.
205 48.72 6.86 6.79 1.50 7.18 40.72 1.50
206 48.38 6.50 6.44 1.50 6.76 42.47 1.50
207 7.06 3177.33 7.06 1.50 3914.86 5.29 1.50
208 11.21 650.02 11.21 1.50 744.12 9.12 1.50
209 68.62 5.80 5.78 1.50 5.73 53.04 1.50
210 68.74 5.55 5.54 1.50 5.42 57.77 1.50
211 3.76 386.88 3.76 1.50 334.32 2.28 1.50
212 11.40 532.78 11.39 1.50 555.89 8.27 1.50
213 15.20 13.59 10.13 1.50 12.79 11.59 1.50
214 5.67 10.06 4.94 1.50 8.24 3.75 1.50
215 3.76 271.56 3.76 1.50 231.16 2.29 1.50
216 11.40 368.38 11.40 1.50 377.95 8.28 1.50
217 15.21 13.74 10.20 1.50 12.93 11.61 1.50
218 5.68 9.97 4.93 1.50 8.18 3.75 1.50
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Overturning And Sliding - X Direction
Critical Load Case for Sliding along X-Direction 211

:
Governing Disturbing Force : 7.35 kN
Governing Restoring Force : 27.62 kN
Minimum Sliding Ratio for the Critical Load 3.76
Case :
Critical Load Case for Overturning about X- 210
Direction :
523
Governing Overturning Moment : - kNm
10.85
Governing Resisting Moment : 58.76 kNm
Minimum Overturning Ratio for the Critical 5.42
Load Case :
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Overturning And Sliding - Z Direction
Critical Load Case for Sliding along Z-Direction 210

:
Governing Disturbing Force : -7.55 kN
Case :
Critical Load Case for Overturning about Z- 211
Direction :
13.10
Load Case :
Critical Load Case And The Governing Factor Of Safety For Sliding Along Resultant Direction
Critical Load Case for Sliding 211
along Resultant Direction :
Minimum Sliding Ratio for the 3.76
Critical Load Case :
Ultimate Pressures
The base pressures reported in this table do not include the effect of buoyancy. However, the area of
footing in contact includes the effect of buoyancy (if any).
524
Area of
Pressure at
Load Case / Pressure at Pressure at Pressure at footing in
bottom
Load top left top right bottom left Contact
right
Combination corner corner corner with soil
corner
ID (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (Au)
(kN/m2)
(m2)
100 53.8385 58.7798 58.5484 53.6071 4.06
101 54.9406 62.3440 62.0204 54.6170 4.06
102 61.7063 76.0962 75.8597 61.4698 4.06
103 36.0641 63.6841 63.5487 35.9287 4.06
104 67.4908 48.2946 47.9436 67.1399 4.06
105 37.6530 42.0907 71.1131 66.6755 4.06
106 65.8759 69.9269 40.4004 36.3494 4.06
107 32.8741 59.4371 59.3905 32.8275 4.06
108 64.3008 44.0476 43.7855 64.0387 4.06
109 34.4631 37.8437 66.9550 63.5743 4.06
110 62.6859 65.6799 36.2423 33.2483 4.06
111 5.6734 45.5905 45.4260 5.5089 2.93
112 45.6993 24.3865 24.2365 45.5493 4.06
113 25.2015 37.3948 51.0239 38.8307 4.06
114 21.5927 50.1085 36.0434 7.5276 3.91
115 11.9702 56.1181 55.8652 11.7172 3.98
116 51.9961 34.9142 34.6757 51.7576 4.06
117 31.4984 47.9225 61.4631 45.0390 4.06
118 27.8895 60.6362 46.4826 13.7359 4.06
Minimum Required Contact Area for Ultimate Loads : 0.00 m2
Actual Area in Contact for all ultimate load cases exceeds the minimum required. Hence Safe
Gross Bearing Capacity for Ultimate Loads : 400.00 kN/m2
525
Maximum Corner Pressure from all ultimate load cases is less than the allowable. Hence Safe
Shear Calculation
Punching Shear Check
1.01 m1.01 m0.12 mPlanXZ

Total Footing Depth, D = 0.30m
Calculated Effective Depth, d = D - Ccover - 1 * db = 0.24 m
Bcol / Dcol = 1.00
Effective depth, d, increased until 0.75XVc
Punching Shear Force, Vu = 114.07kN, Load Case # 102
From ACI Cl. 22.6.5.2, bo for column= 2 ×(BCOL+DCOL+2 ×d) = 3.38 m

Table 22.6.5.2, (b), Vc1 = × b0×d× 2+ fc' = 1867.71 kN
Table 22.6.5.2, (c), Vc2 = 2+ as × db0× fc' = 1522.82 kN
Table 22.6.5.2, (a), Vc3 = b0×d× fc' = 1245.14 kN
Punching shear strength, Vc = 0.75 X minimum of (Vc1, Vc2, Vc3) = 933.86 kN
0.75 X Vc > Vu hence, OK
526
527
Design Calculations
Footing Size
Initial
Length 1.00 m
(Lo) =
Initial 1.00 m
Width
(Wo) =

Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
200 DL 1.00 1.00 1.00
201 DL+FLL+RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
202 DL+0.75FLL+0.75RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
203 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+X)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
204 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-X)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
205 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+Z)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
206 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-Z)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
207 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
208 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
209 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
210 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
211 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
212 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
213 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
214 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
215 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
216 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
528
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
217 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
218 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
100 1.4DL 1.00 1.00 1.00
101 1.2DL+1.6FLL+0.5RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
103 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
104 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
107 0.9DL+1.0EQ(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
108 0.9DL+1.0EQ(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
109 0.9DL+1.0EQ(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
110 0.9DL+1.0EQ(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
111 0.9DL+1.0WL(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
112 0.9DL+1.0WL(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
113 0.9DL+1.0WL(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
114 0.9DL+1.0WL(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
115 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
116 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
117 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
118 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
529
Before consideration of self-weight and load safety factor table

Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
200 1.14 -45.36 -0.01 0.01 -1.66
201 3.37 -83.96 -0.01 0.01 -4.97
202 2.82 -74.31 -0.01 0.01 -4.14
203 4.86 -27.32 0.03 0.05 -7.26
204 -3.14 -40.73 -0.05 -0.03 4.78
205 0.89 -34.01 2.55 2.90 -1.36
206 0.83 -34.04 -2.58 -2.90 -1.13
207 4.51 -13.70 0.03 0.04 -6.76
208 -3.49 -27.12 -0.04 -0.04 5.28
209 0.54 -20.40 2.56 2.90 -0.86
210 0.49 -20.43 -2.57 -2.90 -0.63
211 7.58 11.25 -0.01 0.01 -11.24
212 -3.57 -6.18 -0.01 0.01 5.35
213 2.29 -11.61 1.09 1.25 -3.39
214 5.16 4.35 -1.08 -1.21 -7.61
215 7.58 11.25 -0.01 0.01 -11.24
216 -3.57 -6.18 -0.01 0.01 5.35
217 2.29 -11.61 1.09 1.25 -3.39
218 5.16 4.35 -1.09 -1.21 -7.61
530
Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
100 1.60 -63.50 -0.01 0.01 -2.32
101 2.49 -73.73 -0.01 0.02 -3.64
102 4.94 -116.18 -0.01 0.01 -7.29
103 8.78 -42.01 0.06 0.08 -13.13
104 -6.04 -66.86 -0.08 -0.06 9.16
105 1.42 -54.40 4.73 5.37 -2.20
106 1.32 -54.46 -4.77 -5.37 -1.77
107 8.44 -28.40 0.06 0.08 -12.63
108 -6.38 -53.25 -0.08 -0.06 9.66
109 1.08 -40.79 4.74 5.37 -1.70
110 0.98 -40.85 -4.77 -5.37 -1.28
111 15.97 59.78 -0.01 0.01 -23.71
112 -8.82 21.05 -0.01 0.01 13.15
113 4.20 8.98 2.43 2.76 -6.25
114 10.59 44.45 -2.40 -2.70 -15.64
115 17.43 26.87 -0.01 0.01 -25.86
116 -7.36 -11.86 -0.01 0.01 11.00
117 5.66 -23.93 2.42 2.76 -8.41
118 12.05 11.54 -2.41 -2.69 -17.79

= 1.34 m2
531
Final Footing Size

Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 4.38 m2
factor

(kN/m2) (m2)
(kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902 0.00
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902 0.00
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902 0.00
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902 0.00
532
Pressure at
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902
201 54.5761 62.4115 62.4256 54.5902
Stability Check


overturning
Load
Case Resultant
No.
200 48.95 7336.88 48.95 1.50 11024.59 44.77 1.50
201 22.33 7719.33 22.33 1.50 12053.02 21.72 1.50
202 25.03 7642.97 25.03 1.50 11845.42 24.03 1.50
203 9.67 1618.40 9.67 1.50 1250.11 8.10 1.50
204 17.08 1170.91 17.08 1.50 1944.10 14.79 1.50
533
overturning
Load
Case Resultant
No.
205 56.80 19.71 18.62 1.50 21.15 47.86 1.50
206 60.67 19.52 18.58 1.50 21.16 56.47 1.50
207 8.90 1211.83 8.90 1.50 1074.76 6.95 1.50
208 13.45 1123.53 13.45 1.50 1480.05 11.14 1.50
209 80.17 17.02 16.65 1.50 17.29 61.98 1.50
210 89.47 16.91 16.62 1.50 17.26 81.74 1.50
211 3.65 3699.79 3.65 1.50 7779.27 2.24 1.50
212 10.19 6720.77 10.19 1.50 7622.94 7.56 1.50
213 17.12 35.91 15.45 1.50 34.47 13.31 1.50
214 6.04 28.73 5.91 1.50 24.41 4.09 1.50
215 3.65 2970.91 3.65 1.50 5517.67 2.24 1.50
216 10.19 5019.12 10.19 1.50 6095.07 7.56 1.50
217 17.12 35.98 15.46 1.50 34.44 13.31 1.50
218 6.04 28.68 5.91 1.50 24.44 4.09 1.50

:
Case :
Direction :
Governing Overturning Moment : -3.67 kNm
534
Load Case :

:
Governing Disturbing Force : -2.57 kN
Case :
Direction :
13.51
Load Case :
Ultimate Pressures
535
Area of
Pressure at
Load Case / Pressure at Pressure at Pressure at footing in
bottom
Load top left top right bottom left Contact
right
Combination corner corner corner with soil
corner
ID (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (Au)
(kN/m2)
(m2)
100 51.9878 55.6544 55.6693 52.0027 4.38
101 53.2816 59.0320 59.0496 53.2991 4.38
102 60.1106 71.6001 71.6154 60.1258 4.38
103 38.5248 59.1796 59.3122 38.6574 4.38
104 61.8392 47.4595 47.3494 61.7291 4.38
105 45.5785 49.0196 57.9200 54.4790 4.38
106 54.7957 57.6381 48.7305 45.8881 4.38
107 35.8107 55.6800 55.8080 35.9387 4.38
108 59.1250 43.9599 43.8451 59.0103 4.38
109 42.8644 45.5200 54.4158 51.7602 4.38
110 52.0815 54.1384 45.2263 43.1694 4.38
111 6.9920 44.3338 44.3370 6.9952 3.40
112 44.8577 24.1579 24.1682 44.8680 4.38
113 30.0607 39.9087 44.4776 34.6295 4.38
114 19.0772 43.7363 39.2564 14.5973 4.38
115 12.8101 53.5458 53.5539 12.8182 4.38
116 50.6758 33.3698 33.3851 50.6911 4.38
117 35.8788 49.1207 53.6945 40.4525 4.38
118 24.8953 52.9483 48.4733 20.4204 4.38
536
Shear Calculation
1.045 m1.045 m0.12 mPlanXZ

Bcol / Dcol = 1.00

Table 22.6.5.2, (b), Vc1 = × b0×d× 2+ fc' = 1867.71 kN
Table 22.6.5.2, (a), Vc3 = b0×d× fc' = 1245.14 kN
537
538
Design Calculations
Footing Size
Initial
Length 1.00 m
(Lo) =
Initial 1.00 m
Width
(Wo) =

Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
200 DL 1.00 1.00 1.00
201 DL+FLL+RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
202 DL+0.75FLL+0.75RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
203 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+X)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
204 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-X)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
205 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(+Z)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
206 0.75(DL+0.71EQ(-Z)+FLL) 1.00 1.00 1.00
207 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
208 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
209 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
210 0.75(0.6DL+0.71EQ(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
211 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
212 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
213 0.75(DL+0.6WL(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
214 0.75(DL+0.6WL(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
539
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
215 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
216 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-X)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
217 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(+Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
218 0.75(DL+FLL+0.6WL(-Z)) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
100 1.4DL 1.00 1.00 1.00
101 1.2DL+1.6FLL+0.5RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
102 1.2DL+0.5FLL+1.6RLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
103 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+X)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
104 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-X)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
105 1.2DL+1.0EQ(+Z)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
106 1.2DL+1.0EQ(-Z)+0.5FLL 1.00 1.00 1.00
107 0.9DL+1.0EQ(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
108 0.9DL+1.0EQ(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
109 0.9DL+1.0EQ(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
110 0.9DL+1.0EQ(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
111 0.9DL+1.0WL(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
112 0.9DL+1.0WL(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
113 0.9DL+1.0WL(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
114 0.9DL+1.0WL(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
115 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
116 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-X) 1.00 1.00 1.00
540
Soil Self
Load Load
Bearing Weight
Factor Factor
Number Factor (a)
(b) (c)
117 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(+Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
118 1.2DL+0.5FLL+0.5RLL+1.0WL(-Z) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Before consideration of self weight and load safety factor table

Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
200 1.14 -45.36 -0.01 0.01 -1.65
201 3.37 -83.95 -0.01 0.01 -4.96
202 2.81 -74.30 -0.01 0.01 -4.13
203 4.91 -27.21 0.03 0.05 -7.33
204 -3.20 -40.83 -0.05 -0.03 4.86
205 0.88 -34.00 2.62 2.98 -1.34
206 0.83 -34.04 -2.62 -2.95 -1.12
207 4.57 -13.60 0.03 0.04 -6.83
208 -3.54 -27.22 -0.05 -0.04 5.35
209 0.54 -20.39 2.63 2.98 -0.85
210 0.49 -20.43 -2.62 -2.95 -0.63
211 7.58 11.25 -0.01 0.00 -11.23
212 -3.57 -6.18 -0.01 0.01 5.35
541
Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
213 2.28 -11.61 1.11 1.27 -3.38
214 5.16 4.35 -1.10 -1.23 -7.60
215 7.58 11.25 -0.01 0.01 -11.23
216 -3.57 -6.18 -0.01 0.01 5.36
217 2.28 -11.61 1.11 1.27 -3.38
218 5.16 4.35 -1.10 -1.23 -7.60

Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
100 1.60 -63.50 -0.01 0.01 -2.30
101 2.48 -73.73 -0.02 0.01 -3.63
102 4.93 -116.18 -0.01 0.01 -7.28
103 8.88 -41.82 0.06 0.08 -13.25
104 -6.14 -67.04 -0.09 -0.07 9.31
105 1.42 -54.40 4.86 5.52 -2.18
106 1.32 -54.46 -4.85 -5.46 -1.77
107 8.54 -28.21 0.06 0.08 -12.76
108 -6.48 -53.43 -0.08 -0.07 9.80
109 1.08 -40.79 4.86 5.51 -1.68
110 0.98 -40.86 -4.85 -5.47 -1.27
111 15.97 59.78 -0.01 0.00 -23.70
112 -8.82 21.05 -0.01 0.01 13.16
113 4.20 8.98 2.47 2.81 -6.24
114 10.59 44.45 -2.44 -2.74 -15.63
115 17.43 26.88 -0.02 0.01 -25.85
542
Fy
(kN)
Load Case
Upwards is
positive
116 -7.36 -11.86 -0.01 0.01 11.01
117 5.66 -23.92 2.47 2.81 -8.39
118 12.04 11.55 -2.44 -2.73 -17.78

= 1.34 m2
Final Footing Size

Depth (D2) = 0.30 m
Area (A2) = 4.38 m2
543
factor

(kN/m2) (m2)
(kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2)
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945 0.00
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945 0.00
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945 0.00
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945 0.00
Pressure at
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945
201 54.5840 62.4058 62.4162 54.5945
Stability Check

544

overturning
Load
Case Resultant
No.
200 49.07 5955.41 49.07 1.50 16089.51 45.00 1.50
201 22.35 6431.66 22.35 1.50 16328.69 21.76 1.50
202 25.06 6332.34 25.06 1.50 16281.87 24.08 1.50
203 9.56 1680.75 9.55 1.50 1285.63 8.01 1.50
204 16.79 1076.91 16.79 1.50 1718.92 14.56 1.50
205 57.03 19.20 18.20 1.50 20.60 48.26 1.50
206 60.76 19.19 18.30 1.50 20.80 56.67 1.50
207 8.78 1233.12 8.78 1.50 1092.08 6.86 1.50
208 13.25 1036.55 13.25 1.50 1340.06 10.99 1.50
209 80.57 16.58 16.24 1.50 16.83 62.62 1.50
210 89.55 16.63 16.35 1.50 16.97 81.93 1.50
211 3.65 3028.44 3.65 1.50 20084.94 2.24 1.50
212 10.19 6173.17 10.19 1.50 8554.53 7.55 1.50
213 17.13 35.30 15.41 1.50 33.89 13.34 1.50
214 6.04 28.29 5.91 1.50 24.04 4.10 1.50
215 3.65 2531.20 3.65 1.50 9594.22 2.24 1.50
216 10.19 4731.74 10.19 1.50 6628.22 7.55 1.50
217 17.13 35.36 15.42 1.50 33.85 13.34 1.50
218 6.04 28.25 5.91 1.50 24.06 4.10 1.50
545

:
Case :
Direction :
Governing Overturning Moment : 3.76 kNm
Load Case :

:
Case :
Direction :
13.51
Load Case :
546
Ultimate Pressures
Pressure at Pressure at Pressure at Pressure at Area of footing

Load Case / Load top left top right bottom right bottom left in Contact with
Combination ID corner corner corner corner soil (Au)
(kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (kN/m2) (m2)
100 51.9986 55.6463 55.6565 52.0088 4.38
101 53.2909 59.0250 59.0385 53.3043 4.38
102 60.1202 71.5934 71.6039 60.1308 4.38
103 38.3810 59.2398 59.3689 38.5102 4.38
104 62.0052 47.3907 47.2671 61.8816 4.38
105 45.4733 48.8842 58.0228 54.6119 4.38
106 54.8787 57.7118 48.6476 45.8145 4.38
107 35.6646 55.7419 55.8674 35.7901 4.38
108 59.2887 43.8929 43.7657 59.1615 4.38
109 42.7568 45.3863 54.5213 51.8918 4.38
110 52.1622 54.2140 45.1461 43.0944 4.38
111 6.9998 44.3290 44.3278 6.9986 3.40
112 44.8630 24.1506 24.1615 44.8740 4.38
113 30.0271 39.8596 44.5095 34.6770 4.38
114 19.1171 43.7615 39.2149 14.5705 4.38
115 12.8203 53.5393 53.5418 12.8229 4.38
116 50.6835 33.3609 33.3755 50.6982 4.38
117 35.8476 49.0699 53.7235 40.5013 4.38
118 24.9376 52.9718 48.4290 20.3947 4.38
547
Shear Calculation
1.045 m1.045 m0.12 mPlanXZ

Bcol / Dcol = 1.00

Table 22.6.5.2, (b), Vc1 = × b0×d× 2+ fc' = 1867.71 kN
Table 22.6.5.2, (a), Vc3 = b0×d× fc' = 1245.14 kN
548
APPENDIX G: FINAL ESTIMATES
G.1 Final Estimates for Economic Constraint
Trade-off 1: Final Estimates for Economic Constraint

TRADE OFF 1 (SMRF): FINAL ESTIMATES FOR ECONOMIC CONSTRAINT
Bulacan
Trade-off 1 (Economic Cost)
PAY
ITE Unit Total
QUANTI
TY
Cost Cost
NO.
10000.0
Building Permit Fees 1.00 Lot 10000.00
0
B Mobilization
10000.0
Temporary Barracks 1.00 Job 10000.00
0
10000.0
Portable Toilet 6.00 Job 60000.00
0
A Excavation
Footing 362.54 cu.m 413.95 150073.43
B Backfiling
Footing 118.78 cu.m 413.95 49168.98
Total Cost Amount

Materials 10000.00
Labor Cost 39360.00
549
A Footing
Portland Cement (40kg) 714.00 bags 237.40 169503.60
Wash Sand 81.50 cu.m 93.00 7579.50

16mmØ X 6.0m Deformed Reinforcement Bar 182.00 pcs 392.00 71344.00
No.16 GI Tie Wire 27.15 kg 78.68 2136.16
C Base Pedestal
Wash Sand 60.00 cu.m 93.00 5580.00

No.16 GI Tie Wire 13.85 kg 78.68 1089.72
Total Cost Amount

Materials 379879.38
A Columns
W12X35 390.45 kg 63.49 24789.67
W14X61 10923.40 kg 63.49 693526.67
W16X50 1196.13 kg 63.49 75942.29
550
B Beams
W12X19 844.53 kg 63.49 53619.21
W12X26 773.25 kg 63.49 49093.64
W12X30 1606.46 kg 63.49 101994.15
W14X30 3234.95 kg 63.49 205386.98
W16X31 8305.38 kg 63.49 527308.58
D Bracing
L8X8X1/2 3418.39 kg 61.15 209034.55

Wash Sand 39.90 c.um 93.00 3710.70
6"Concrete Hollow Block 2622.66 pcs 18.00 47207.88
No.16 GI Tie Wire 15.36 kg 78.68 1208.52

Wash Sand 77.70 c.um 93.00 7226.10
No.16 GI Tie Wire 46.93 kg 78.68 3692.45
Total Cost Amount

551
A Doors
135000.
Roller Shutter door 2 set 270000.00
00
B Windows
Jalousie Window 15 sets 690.00 10350.00
16523.2
xox Horizontal Slider 7 sets 115662.61
3
Total Cost Amount

Materials 403826.67
A Tiles
APO Pearl Mist Vinyl Tile (30x30) (for Office) 612 pcs 20.75 12699.00
B Mortar
Total Cost Amount

Materials 25660.60
Labor Cost 7698.18
552
VII Materials
SCAFOLDING
sheet
1/2" Thk Ordinary Plywood 97 680.00 65960.00
s
2" X 4" X 8' Good Lumber 319.00 pcs 125.00 39875.00
Used Oil 34.00 gals 15.00 510.00
Total Cost Amount

Materials 321207.50
Labor Cost 96362.25

Exterior and Interior Walls (semi-gloss paint
597 gal 873.00 521181.00
finish)
Exterior and Interior Ceilings (flat paint finish) 145 gal 620.00 89900.00
Steel Casement Windows (QDE paint finish) 24 gal 501.00 12024.00
Total Cost Amount

Materials 628675.40
DIRECT COST
I&
II
553

710470.7067
PROFIT 5% 355235.3534
47489.357
Cost per sqm 190 sqm Php
77
Trade off-2: Final Estimates for Economic Constraint

TRADE OFF 2 (SMRF WITH CHEVRON): FINAL ESTIMATES FOR ECONOMIC CONSTRAINT
Bulacan
PA
Y Unit Total
ITE QUANTI
DESCRIPTION UNIT Material Material
M TY
Cost Cost
NO.
10000.0
0
B Mobilization
10000.0
0
10000.0
0
554
A Excavation
Footing 362.54 cu.m 413.95 150073.43
B Backfiling
Footing 118.78 cu.m 413.95 49168.98
Total Cost Amount

Materials 10000.00
Labor Cost 39360.00
A Footing
Wash Sand 42.00 cu.m 93.00 3906.00

No.16 GI Tie Wire 58.4 kg 78.68 4594.91
C Base Pedestal
Wash Sand 41.00 cu.m 93.00 3813.00

No.16 GI Tie Wire 11.26 kg 78.68 885.94
555
Total Cost Amount
Materials 359262.05
A Columns
W12X40 1552.11 kg 63.49 98543.46
W14X43 7042.77 kg 63.49 447145.47
B Beams
W8X18 4784.92 kg 63.49 303794.57
W12X19 844.53 kg 63.49 53619.21
W12X26 1063.16 kg 63.49 67500.03
W12X30 1606.46 kg 63.49 101994.15
W14X30 3234.95 kg 63.49 205386.98
C Bracing
L5X5X5/16 988.61 kg 61.15 60453.50
L8X8X1/2 3418.39 kg 61.15 209034.55

Wash Sand 39.90 c.um 93.00 3710.70
No.16 GI Tie Wire 15.36 kg 78.68 1208.52
556
Wash Sand 77.70 c.um 93.00 7226.10
No.16 GI Tie Wire 46.93 kg 78.68 3692.45
Total Cost Amount

A Doors
135000.
Roller Shutter door 2 set 270000.00
00
B Windows
16523.2
xox Horizontal Slider 7 sets 115662.61
3
Total Cost Amount

Materials 403826.67
A Tiles
557
B Mortar
Total Cost Amount

Materials 25660.60
Labor Cost 7698.18

VII Materials
SCAFOLDING
sheet
s
Used Oil 34.00 gals 15.00 510.00
Total Cost Amount

Materials 321207.50
Labor Cost 96362.25

Exterior and Interior Walls (semi-gloss paint
597 gal 873.00 521181.00
finish)
Total Cost Amount
558
Materials 628675.40
DIRECT COST
I&
II

646357.6659
PROFIT 5% 323178.833
43203.907
14
559
Trade off-3: Final Estimates for Economic Constraint
TRADE OFF 3 (SMRF WITH CROSS): FINAL ESTIMATES FOR ECONOMIC CONSTRAINT
Bulacan
PAY
ITE Unit Total
QUANTI
TY
Cost Cost
NO.
10000.0
0
B Mobilization
10000.0
0
10000.0
0
A Excavation
150073.4
Footing 362.54 cu.m 413.95
3
B Backfiling
Footing 118.78 cu.m 413.95 49168.98
Total Cost Amount

Materials 10000.00
Labor Cost 39360.00
560
A Footing
148137.6
0
Wash Sand 57.50 cu.m 93.00 5347.50

No.16 GI Tie Wire 58.4 kg 78.68 4594.91
C Base Pedestal
Wash Sand 38.00 cu.m 93.00 3534.00

No.16 GI Tie Wire 8.85 kg 78.68 696.32
Total Cost Amount

Materials 353055.13
Labor Cost 99287.80
A Columns
100095.5
W12X40 1552.11 kg 64.49
7
461231.0
W14X43 7042.77 kg 65.49
1
561
B Beams
299009.6
W8X18 4784.92 kg 62.49
5
W12X19 844.53 kg 63.49 53619.21
W12X26 1063.16 kg 63.49 67500.03
101994.1
W12X30 1606.46 kg 63.49
5
205386.9
W14X30 3234.95 kg 63.49
8
D Bracing
L5X5X5/16 1338.58 kg 61.15 61.15
107046.1
L6X6X5/16 1750.55 kg 61.15
3
Total Cost Amount


257341.6
0
Wash Sand 39.90 c.um 93.00 3710.70
No.16 GI Tie Wire 15.36 kg 78.68 1208.52

754219.8
0
Wash Sand 77.70 c.um 93.00 7226.10
No.16 GI Tie Wire 46.93 kg 78.68 3692.45
562
Total Cost Amount
A Doors
135000. 270000.0
Roller Shutter door 2 set
00 0
B Windows
16523.2 115662.6
xox Horizontal Slider 7 sets
3 1
Total Cost Amount

Materials 403826.67
A Tiles
B Mortar
Total Cost Amount

Materials 25660.60
563
Labor Cost 7698.18

VII Materials
SCAFOLDING
sheet
s
Used Oil 34.00 gals 15.00 510.00
Total Cost Amount

Materials 321207.50
Labor Cost 96362.25

Exterior and Interior Walls (semi-gloss paint 521181.0
597 gal 873.00
finish) 0
Total Cost Amount

Materials 628675.40
DIRECT COST
564
I&
II

621338.1723
PROFIT 5% 310669.0861
41531.55
152
G.2 Final Estimates for Constructability Constraint
Trade-off 1: Final Estimates for Constructability Constraint
CONSTRUCTABILITY CONSTRAINT
SET OF SE HOURLY DAILY NUM

ITE DESCRIP CREW T QUAN PRODUC UNIT/ PRODUC BER
UNIT
M TION SIZE/EQUI SI TITY TION HR TION OF
PMENT ZE RATE RATE DAYS
FORMWOR
1. F
K
FORMWO 1
5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M./
F1 RK TO CARPENTER, 62.5 1.1 8.8 2
0 /HR DAY
FOOTING 1 LABOR
FORMWO
1
RK TO 5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M./
F2 CARPENTER, 90 0.6 4.8 4
BASE 0 /HR DAY
1 LABOR
PEDESTAL
565
2. MASONRY
M WORKS
CHB 1 MASON, 1 10. SQ.M. SQ.M./
M1 562.5 1.88 15.04 4
WORK (4") LABOR 00 /HR DAY
M2 300 1.5 12 4
EARTHWO
3. E
RKS
EXCAVATI 2.0 CU.M. CU.M/
E1 1 DOZER 362.5 3.125 25 2
ON 0 /HR DAY
BACKFILLI 1 2.0 CU.M. CU.M./
E2 147.32 0.78 30 2
NG PAYLOADER 0 /HR DAY
PLASTERIN
4. P
G WORKS
PLASTERIN
G WORKS 1 MASON, 1 10. SQ.M. SQ.M/
P1 300 1.35 10.8 4
(EXTERNAL LABOR 00 /HR DAY
)
PLASTERIN
1 MASON, 1 10. SQ.M. SQ.M./
P2 G WORKS 562.5 1.6 12.8 4
LABOR 00 /HR DAY
(INTERNAL)
REINFORC
5. R EMENT
WORKS
REBAR TO 2.0 1,725.6 KGS/H KGS/H
R1 1 STEEL MAN 25 200 5
FOOTING 0 3 R R
REBAR TO
2.0 KGS/H KGS/H
R2 BASE 1 STEEL MAN 322.52 20 160 2
0 R R
PEDESTAL
6. CONCRETE
C WORKS
CONCRET
1 MASON, 1 5.0 CU.M. CU.M/
C1 E TO 352.19 2.4 19.2 6
LABOR 0 /HR DAY
FOOTING
CONCRET
1 MASON, 1 5.0 CU.M. CU.M./
C2 E TO BASE 187 0.26 2.8 3
LABOR 0 /HR DAY
PEDESTAL
PAINTING
7.
WORKS (1
PW
COAT)
EXTERIOR
PW 10. SQ.M. CU.M/
WALL 1 PAINTER 300 1.38 11.04 3
1 00 /HR DAY
PAINTING
INTERIOR
PW 10. SQ.M. CU.M./
WALL 1 PAINTER 562.5 1.54 12.32 5
2 00 /HR DAY
PAINTING
566
8. TILING
TW WORKS
TILE
WORKS
TW 1 MASON, 1 2.0 SQ.M. SQ.M/
(FLOOR 50 2.25 18 2
1 LABOR 0 /HR DAY
TILES FOR
OFFICE)
9. ROOF
RW WORKS
INSTALLATI 1
RW 5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M/
ON OF CARPENTER, 450 4.88 39.02 3
1 0 /HR DAY
ROOFING 1 LABOR
INSTALLATI 1
RW 5.0 L.M./H L.M./D
ON OF CARPENTER, 300 1.78 14.24 5
2 0 R AY
GUTTER 1 LABOR
WINDOW
10.
INSTALLATI
W
ON
WINDOW
RW 1 SKILLED, 1 1.0 SET/H SET/DA
INSTALLATI 22 0.38 3 8
1 LABOR 0 R Y
ON
DOOR
11,
INSTALLATI
D
ON
DOOR 1
2.0 SET/H SET/DA
D1 INSTALLATI CARPENTER, 7 0.38 3 3
0 R Y
ON 1 LABOR
12. STEEL
ST WORKS
1 WELDER, 1 10. L.M./H L.M./D
ST1 COLUMNS 40 32 24 3
LABOR 00 R AY
ST2 BEAMS 67 53.6 40.2 8
LABOR 00 R AY
ST3 BRACINGS 12 9.6 7.2 3
LABOR 00 R AY
SUMMARY
ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION NUMBER OF DAYS
1 FORMWORK 6
2 MASONRY WORKS 8
3 EARTHWORKS 4
4 PLASTERING WORKS 8
5 REINFORCEMENT WORKS 7
6 CONCRETE WORKS 9
7 PAINTING WORKS 8
567
8 TILING WORKS 2
9 ROOF WORKS 8
10 WINDOW INSTALLATION 8
11 DOOR INSTALLATION 3
12 STEEL WORKS 14
PROJECT DURATION: 85 CONSTRUCTION WORKING DAYS

UNIT
FORMWOR
1. F
K
FORMWO 1
5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M./
0 /HR DAY
FOOTING 1 LABOR
FORMWO
1
F2 CARPENTER, 90 0.6 4.8 4
BASE 0 /HR DAY
1 LABOR
PEDESTAL
2. MASONRY
M WORKS
M1 562.5 1.88 15.04 4
M2 300 1.5 12 4
EARTHWO
3. E
RKS
E1 1 DOZER 365.5 3.125 25 2
ON 0 /HR DAY
E2 147.32 0.78 30 2
PLASTERIN
4. P
G WORKS
PLASTERIN
P1 300 1.35 10.8 4
)
568
PLASTERIN
P2 G WORKS 562.5 1.6 12.8 4
LABOR 00 /HR DAY
(INTERNAL)
REINFORC
5. R EMENT
WORKS
R1 1 STEEL MAN 25 200 5
FOOTING 0 8 R R
REBAR TO
2.0 KGS/H KGS/H
R2 BASE 1 STEEL MAN 274.11 20 160 1
0 R R
PEDESTAL
6. CONCRETE
C WORKS
CONCRET
C1 E TO 543.13 2.4 19.2 10
LABOR 0 /HR DAY
FOOTING
CONCRET
C2 E TO BASE 236.15 0.26 2.8 5
LABOR 0 /HR DAY
PEDESTAL
PAINTING
7.
WORKS (1
PW
COAT)
EXTERIOR
PW 10. SQ.M. CU.M/
WALL 1 PAINTER 300 1.38 11.04 3
1 00 /HR DAY
PAINTING
INTERIOR
PW 10. SQ.M. CU.M./
WALL 1 PAINTER 562.5 1.54 12.32 5
2 00 /HR DAY
PAINTING
8. TILING
TW WORKS
TILE
WORKS
(FLOOR 50 2.25 18 2
1 LABOR 0 /HR DAY
TILES FOR
OFFICE)
9. ROOF
RW WORKS
INSTALLATI 1
RW 5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M/
ON OF CARPENTER, 450 4.88 39.02 3
1 0 /HR DAY
ROOFING 1 LABOR
INSTALLATI 1
ON OF CARPENTER, 300 1.78 14.24 5
2 0 R AY
GUTTER 1 LABOR
569
WINDOW
10.
INSTALLATI
W
ON
WINDOW
1 LABOR 0 R Y
ON
DOOR
11,
INSTALLATI
D
ON
DOOR 1
2.0 SET/H SET/DA
0 R Y
ON 1 LABOR
12. STEEL
ST WORKS
LABOR 00 R AY
ST2 BEAMS 73 58.4 43.8 7
LABOR 00 R AY
ST3 BRACINGS 28 22.4 16.8 3
LABOR 00 R AY
SUMMARY
1 FORMWORK 6
2 MASONRY WORKS 8
3 EARTHWORKS 4
6 CONCRETE WORKS 15
7 PAINTING WORKS 8
8 TILING WORKS 2
9 ROOF WORKS 8
12 STEEL WORKS 13
570

UNIT
FORMWOR
1. F
K
FORMWO 1
5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M./
0 /HR DAY
FOOTING 1 LABOR
FORMWO
1
F2 CARPENTER, 90 0.6 4.8 4
BASE 0 /HR DAY
1 LABOR
PEDESTAL
2. MASONRY
M WORKS
M1 562.5 1.88 15.04 4
M2 300 1.5 12 4
EARTHWO
3. E
RKS
E1 1 DOZER 362.5 3.125 25 2
ON 0 /HR DAY
E2 147.32 0.78 30 2
PLASTERIN
4. P
G WORKS
PLASTERIN
P1 300 1.35 10.8 4
)
PLASTERIN
P2 G WORKS 562.5 1.6 12.8 4
LABOR 00 /HR DAY
(INTERNAL)
REINFORC
5. R EMENT
WORKS
R1 1 STEEL MAN 25 200 2
FOOTING 0 7 R R
571
REBAR TO
5.0 KGS/H KGS/H
R2 BASE 1 STEEL MAN 248.14 20 160 1
0 R R
PEDESTAL
6. CONCRETE
C WORKS
CONCRET
C1 E TO 585.45 2.4 19.2 13
LABOR 0 /HR DAY
FOOTING
CONCRET
C2 E TO BASE 295.47 0.26 2.8 6
LABOR 0 /HR DAY
PEDESTAL
PAINTING
7.
WORKS (1
PW
COAT)
EXTERIOR
PW 10. SQ.M. CU.M/
WALL 1 PAINTER 300 1.38 11.04 3
1 00 /HR DAY
PAINTING
INTERIOR
PW 10. SQ.M. CU.M./
WALL 1 PAINTER 562.5 1.54 12.32 5
2 00 /HR DAY
PAINTING
8. TILING
TW WORKS
TILE
WORKS
(FLOOR 50 2.25 18 2
1 LABOR 0 /HR DAY
TILES FOR
OFFICE)
9. ROOF
RW WORKS
INSTALLATI 1
RW 5.0 SQ.M. SQ.M/
ON OF CARPENTER, 450 4.88 39.02 3
1 0 /HR DAY
ROOFING 1 LABOR
INSTALLATI 1
ON OF CARPENTER, 300 1.78 14.24 5
2 0 R AY
GUTTER 1 LABOR
WINDOW
10.
INSTALLATI
W
ON
WINDOW
1 LABOR 0 R Y
ON
DOOR
11,
INSTALLATI
D
ON
DOOR 1
2.0 SET/H SET/DA
0 R Y
ON 1 LABOR
572
12. STEEL
ST WORKS
LABOR 00 R AY
ST2 BEAMS 73 58.4 43.8 7
LABOR 00 R AY
ST3 BRACINGS 28 22.4 16.8 3
LABOR 00 R AY
SUMMARY
1 FORMWORK 6
2 MASONRY WORKS 8
3 EARTHWORKS 4
6 CONCRETE WORKS 19
7 PAINTING WORKS 8
8 TILING WORKS 2
9 ROOF WORKS 8
12 STEEL WORKS 13
G.3 Final Estimates for Sustainability Constraint
Trade-off 1: Final Estimates for Sustainability Constraint

TRADE-OFF 1: SPECIAL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME
SUSTAINABILITY CONSTRAINT
MAINTENANCE COST TOTAL PROJECT COST x 0.25
TOTAL PROJECT COST MAINTENANCE COST

Php 9,022,977.98 Php 2,255,744.5
573
TRADE-OFF 2: CHEVRON BRACING SYSTEM/ INVERTED V BRACING

Php 8,208,472.36 Php 2,052,118.09

TRADE-OFF 3: CROSS BRACING SYSTEM/ CONCENTRIC X BRACING

Php 7,890,994.79 Php 1,972,748.7
G.4 Final Estimates for Risk-Assessment Constraint
-off and
able to assess the following:
Special Moment Frame resisting
system
16.13 mm 5.15 mm 5.8 mm
Special Moment Frame Resisting System
Drift Check
Ds: 0.005
Ct:: 0.0853
T: 0.4076579737
h: 8.05m
h: 1m
Dm: 0.025
R: 8, SMRF
Chevron Bracing System
Drift Check
574
Ds: 0.006
Ct:: 0.0853
T: 0.4076579737
h: 8.05m
h: 1m
Dm: 0.025
R: 6, BRACING
Cross Bracing System
Drift Check
Ds: 0.006
Ct:: 0.0853
T: 0.4076579737
h: 8.05m
h: 1m
Dm: 0.025
R: 6, BRACING
G.5 Final Estimates for Safety Constraint

system
100% 168.06% 164.01%
Story drift of each bracing types
SMRF: 16.128 mm
Chevron: 5.151 mm
Cross: 5.804 mm
For Special Moment Frame Resisting System
575
For Cross Bracing System
G.6 Final Estimates for Uncertainty Constraint

system
100% 31.94% 35.99%
Story drift of each bracing types
SMRF: 16.128 mm
Chevron: 5.151 mm
Cross: 5.804 mm
For SMRF
For Chevron
For Cross
576
APPENDIX H: CURRICULUM VITAE
577
JOHN KENNETH C. DELA CRUZ
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP) QC
Address: Blk 5 Lot 38, Heraldville Brgy. San Isidro Angono, Rizal
E-mail Address: qjkcdelacruz@tip.edu.ph
Cellular No.: +639957100386
CAREER OBJECTIVE
To obtain a position as a civil engineer or any related fields to my qualifications. To experience new things that will help me
throughout my career and to discover the realities of my profession..
DESIGN PROJECT COMPLETED / RESEARCH
Study to Evaluate the Utilization of Physical and Instructional Facilities in Our Lady of Peace School
The goal of this research is to determine whether the resource and the facilities of the school is enough and functional well so
that it can be used by the students. It also aims to evaluate if all the facilities it truly utilized and to recommend the necessary
actions and plans for it to be used well.
SEMINARS AND TRAININGS ATTENDED
SIX (6) HOURS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN WORKSHOP – REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN
MARCH 20, 2021
WHICH BRANCH DO YOU BELONG: ACCUSTOM YOURSELF WITH THE DIFFERENT SPECIALIZATION IN THE CIVIL
ENGINEERING PROFESSION
December 18, 2020
PICE VIRTUAL NATIONAL CONVENTION AND TECHNICAL CONFERENCE

NOVEMBER 20-21, 2020
STUDENT LEADERSHIP TO THE YOUTH PROGRAM

February 11, 2017
ROBOTICS PILOTING AND PROGRAMMING WITH OLYMPIAD

December 02, 2016
SAN ANTONIO DE PADUA PARISH SEMINAR FOR WELLNESS

November 15, 2014
ON-THE JOB TRAINING/ PRACTICUM/ INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE

.
B-MIRK Company Intern (March 19, 2018 - March 23, 2018)
B-mirk company is a warehouse company where they sold and store the products such as la pasita, san mig coffee, and many
more. They train their intern by teaching them how to record and compute the salary of their workers. They also teach the
process on how their product is released in the market and introduce new ones to them. We are taught how to sort and to time
on how the workers efficiently pack and box their product and that will affect their salary and performance. They also taught us
on receipt checking, computing and the in and out policy when it comes to delivery on when it will arrive supposedly since the
products are goods.
LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES
3rd Year Representative, Philippine Institute of Civil Engineers TIP - QC Student Chapter (August 2020 – June 2021)
Responsible for the announcement and to deliver the message of my organization to the 3rd year Civil Engineering Student
and to answer their inquiries about the organization. Also announces the upcoming event that will be held and be able to hear
their concern regarding about any information we can share with.
STudent Empowerment for Excellent Leadership (S.T.E.E.L) (August 2019 – April 2020)
Be mentored by the student leader and enhance our leadership skills so that we can know what can we expect when we
become leaders ourselves. Also it enables us to develop our charisma skill and to motivate us to join various activities so that
we can be confident when we are in the competition and aim to be the best.
OTHER SKILLS
Major Skills
Ability to work under pressure.
Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, Power point
Problem Solver
Innovator
Organizational and Managerial Skills
Leadership skill
Minor Skills
Proficient in AutoCAD
C++ programmer
Adaptability and Versatility
CHARACTER REFERENCES
ENGR. GERARD C. RIZARDO

Instructor, Technological Institute of the Philippines – Quezon City
Grizardo.ee@tip.edu.ph
09957446051
PEPITO, CHINA JANEL
BS Civil Engineering, Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP)
Address: Lansones Drive Payatas B, Quezon City
Email Address: qcj-pepito@tip.edu.ph
Cellular No.: +63-932-7944-151
OBJECTIVE
To join an interactive organization where I can apply and contribute my knowledge and experience to the organization.
And to also enhance the skills that I have, all the while developing other skills that are useful to my personal growth and
future career.
DESIGN PROJECTS COMPLETED/ RESEARCHES UNDERTAKEN
The Effectiveness of Concrete with Bathroom Sponge Cubes as an Additive to Increase Its Early Compressive
Strength
A Design of Experiment submitted to Engr. Yenko Tandoc, Professor of Civil Engineering Department at Technological
Institute of the Philippines, in partial fulfillment of the requirements in Construction Materials and Testing (S.Y. 2018
2019).
Solar, Air, and Water (SAW) Power Bank
An investigatory project presented to the Faculty of New Era University Integrated School Senior High School
Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements in Physics 2 (S.Y. 2017 2018).
Salt Water Alternative Phone Charger using Galvanic Cell
An investigatory project presented to the Faculty of New Era University Integrated School Senior High School
Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements in Physics 1 (S.Y. 2017 2018).
A research paper presented to Dr. Marissa R. Operario, Professor of English at the New Era University, in partial
fulfillment of the requirements in Research 2 (S.Y. 2016 2017).
e
A research paper presented to Dr. Marissa R. Operario, Professor of English at the New Era University, in partial
fulfillment of the requirements in Research 1 (S.Y. 2016 2017).
ormance
A research paper presented to the Faculty of New Era University High School Department in partial fulfillment of the
requirements in English 10 (S.Y. 2015 2016).
y Formulation
A research paper presented to the Faculty of New Era University High School Department in partial fulfillment of the
requirements in Research 10 (S.Y. 2015 2016).
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, AND ATTITUDE

Being a student from TIP with its orientation towards outcome-based education, I have acquired and can demonstrate
the following student acquired outcomes (knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to the practice of the engineering
profession:
Understand professional, ethical, legal, security, and social issues and responsibilities relevant to professional
engineering practice.
Use modern techniques, skills, and tools of the engineering practice in complex computing activities.
SEMINARS AND TRAINING ATTENDED
Autodesk Revit in Construction Estimations

Real Excellence Online Civil Engineering Review
August 1, 2021
Excel Essentials: Excel Made Easy for Beginners
CCA Institute of Computing Studies and Library Information Science
July 28, 2021
Estimates - Method of Measurement for Earthworks
Upswing Learning Center
July 25, 2021
What's Next? Career Opportunities in Civil Engineering
PICE T.I.P. Q.C. Student Chapter: Student Convention
March 27, 2021
STAAD Workshop Steel Design
PICE T.I.P. Q.C. Student Chapter: STAAD Workshop
March 22, 2021
Envisioning Better Philippines: Rounding-up the Key Elements on Building Smart Cities
ACI Federation of Student Leaders: Webinar Series 2021 Day 4
February 7, 2021
- Philippines
January 31, 2021
Construction Quality Control: Designs and Strategies of Highways and Bridges in the Philippines
January 24, 2021
Flood Resiliency: Hydraulic Structures Design for Flood Control in the Philippines
January 17, 2021
Webinar about Water Resources Engineering, and Construction Engineering and Project Management
PICE T.I.P. Q.C. Student Chapter: Find Out Where You Belong Day 2
December 19, 2020
Webinar about Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering, Transportation Engineering, and Structural
Engineering
PICE T.I.P. Q.C. Student Chapter: Find Out Where You Belong Day 1
December 18, 2020
C.E. Focus: Understanding the Past, Engineering the Future
Civil Engineering Department Student Council: Webinar for Civil Engineering Celebration 2020
November 29, 2020
Post-Pandemic Construction: Withstanding the Challenges in Building a New Normal
November 22, 2020
Green Engineering: Enhancing the Practice of Environmental Sustainability
November 8, 2020
Concrete Industry Innovation: Solution and Sustainability of Structural Designs
ACI T.I.P. Q.C. Student Chapter: DeterminACI Webinar 2020
November 6, 2020
Safety Management: Strengthening Safety Standards towards Quality Construction
October 25, 2020
Software Design: Advancement in Construction Methodology
October 18, 2020
United Metropolis Conference Summer Leadership Training
United Church of Christ in the Philippines Church of the Holy Redeemer, Road 2, Project 6, Quezon City
October 22, 2016
EXTRA AND CO-CURRICULAR ENGAGEMENTS AND VOLUNTEER WORKS
QCYDO Scholar
S.Y. 2020 Present
Finance Committee of Philippine Institute of Civil Engineers TIP QC Student Chapter
S.Y. 2021 2022
With High Honors Academic Scholar
1st Semester of A.Y. 2018-2019 1st Semester of A.Y. 2019-2020
1st Semester of A.Y. 2020-2021 Present
National City United Church Christian Youth Fellowship Core Group Officer
E.Y. 2019 Present
3rd Place Bridge Building Competition of Association of Civil Engineering Students FEU Institute of Technology
June 2, 2021
Student Empowerment for Excellent Leadership (S.T.E.E.L) Mentee
S.Y. 2020 2021
Member of American Concrete Institute TIP QC Student Chapter
S.Y. 2020 2021
Member of Philippine Institute of Civil Engineers TIP QC Student Chapter
S.Y. 2018 2021
1st Place Quiz and Spelling Bee of Humanities and Social Sciences Society
September 20, 2019
Member of Abstract Combination and Emotional Quotient
S.Y. 2018 2020
National City United Church Vacation Church School Assistant Teacher
E.Y. 2016 2018
Pandayan Filipino Club Grade 11 STEM Coordinator
S.Y. 2016 2017
Youth Forum Grade 10 Coordinator
S.Y. 2015 2016
Young Scientist Club Grade 10 Coordinator
S.Y. 2015 2016
Young Artist Club Public Information Officer
S.Y. 2015 2016
National City United Church Christian Youth Fellowship Public Relations Officer
E.Y. 2015 2018
1st Place Olymphysics of Young Scientist Club
September 25, 2015
With High Honors Awardee
S.Y. 2014 2018
Kagawaran ng Huwarang Kabataan (KHK) Awardee
S.Y. 2013 2016
Member of Girl Scout of the Philippines
S.Y. 2013 2015
With Honors Awardee
S.Y. 2013 2014
OTHER SKILLS
Knowledgeable in AutoCAD, STAAD, and SketchUp Software

Knowledgeable in Word, Excel, and Powerpoint
Active listening, observation, and perception skills
Excellent communication skills, including written, and oral
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
College BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING

938 Aurora Blvd., Cubao, Quezon City
2018 Present
Senior High School SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS STRAND

NEW ERA UNIVERSITY
No. 9 Central Ave., New Era, Quezon City
2016 2018
Junior High School NEW ERA UNIVERSITY

No. 9 Central Ave., New Era, Quezon City
2013 2016
Elementary SILOAM CHRISTIAN ACADEMY

Sto. Niño St. Payatas A, Quezon City
2006 2012
REFERENCES
Engr. Kathryn Ann Faderon Engr. Leyne Gendran

Civil Engineer Civil Engineer
Westbury Technical Services Westbury Technical Services
Phils. Inc. Phils. Inc.
+639328450315 +639052759647
I hereby certify that the information written above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge.
__CHINA JANEL PEPITO__

Signature over printed name
JOSHUA RAYMUNDO
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP) QC
Address: 215 Evangelista St. Santolan Pasig, NCR
Tel. No.: 983-6104
Email Address: .@
Cellular No.: +639163322530
CAREER OBJECTIVE
Seeking a career that is challenging and interesting, and lets me work on the leading areas of technology, a job that gives me
opportunities to learn, innovate and enhance my skills and strengths in conjunction with company goals and objectives.
DESIGN PROJECT COMPLETED / RESEARCH
PROPOSAL OF A 120M CONCRETE BOX GIRDER BRIDGE IN EASTWOOD CITY TO SANTOLAN PASIG
This design project served as a partial fulfilment to the course Bridge Engineering. The bridge is a 2-lane bridge with 4 spans
along with the lengths of 25, 35, 35, and 25 meters, with a total of 120-meters and was statically and dynamically analyzed
and designed using the CSI Bridge Software.
PROPOSAL OF TWO-STOREY MULTI-PURPOSE STRUCTURE IN CALOOCAN CITY

This design project served as a partial fulfilment to the course Computer Applications in Structural Engineering. The two-story
multipurpose structure was drafted in AutoCAD and analyzed and designed with the help of STAAD.Pro Connect.
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF TWO-STOREY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURAL FRAMING SYSTEM

This design project served as a partial fulfilment to the course Matrix Analysis of Structures. The two-story residential
structural framing system was analyzed using the Direct Stiffness Method with the aid of Microsoft Excel and manual
computation using the classical method of analysis called Slope-Deflection Method.
SEMINARS AND TRAININGS ATTENDED
SIX (6) HOURS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN WORKSHOP REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN
March 20, 2021
This workshop is a whole-day intensive technical training on the use of Structural Analysis and Design Program Connect
(STAAD.Pro Connect). In this workshop, we analyzed and designed a three-story hospital building against dead and live
loads, seismic loads, and wind loads
PAPRISA LEADERSHIP TRAINING STOTSENBERG HOTEL PAMPANGA - FEBRUARY 2016

This leadership training and seminar is headed by the Pasig City Association of Private School Administrators in order to
develop the students leadership capabilities and to be an effective learner
LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES
AUDITOR, CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STUDENT COUNCIL, T.I.P. QC (SY 2020-2021)

Audits all the money transaction of the DSC, Manages Facebook and Instagram page.
MENTEE, STUDENT EMPOWERMENT FOR EXCELLENT LEADRSHIP (SY 2019-2020)

Managed by the CE-DSC and has done the publication materials, and do the assigned task.
COMMITEE, OLPHS SUPREME STUDENT COUNCIL (SY 2015-2018)

Managed by the CE-DSC and has done the publication materials, and do the assigned task.
WING INTELLIGENCE(S2), 131st AEROSPACE CADETS OF THE PHILIPPINES (SY 2016-2017)

Taught basic military drills, physical training, and leadership capabilities
OTHER SKILLS
Excellent communication skills in English both oral and written.

Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, and Power point
Proficient in AutoCAD
Proficient in STAAD.Pro
PERSONAL INFORMATION
HEIGHT : 165 5
WEIGHT : 75 kg
SEX : Male
BIRTHDATE : July 03, 2000
BIRTHPLACE : Pasig City
RELIGION : Catholic
NAME OF MOTHER : Relina E. Raymundo OCCUPATION : Housewife
NAME OF FATHER : Evandino C. Raymundo OCCUPATION : Civil Servant
CHARACTER REFERENCES
Mariane Dela Cruz
High School Faculty Head
Our Lady of Perpetual Help School
delacruzmariane02@yahoo.com
09277521730
John Paolo Sandicho

Instructor (College of Arts and Letters)
University of the Philippines Diliman
jvsandicho@up.edu,ph
09955934958
Ma. Wilma Dela Cruz

SHS Professor/Faculty
Our Lady of Perpetual Help School
ma.wilmadelacruz@gmail.com
09083824446
ROBIN FRANCIS C. ROQUERO
M
ozart Ext. Greenville Subd. Sauyo, Quezon City, M
etro M
anila 1116
qrfcroquero@tip.edu.ph
+639663648967
OBJECTIVE
To be a omre productive and com

petent person by working in an organization where I can put all of ymlessons
gained to good use while also enhancing ymknowledge, abilities, attitude, and value.
PROFILE
4th year BSCE student
Technological Institute of The Philippines- Quezon City
Cubao, Quezon City
Currently the President of ACIP-TIPQC Student Chapter
PERSONAL INFORM
ATION
Age: 22
Date of Birth: Septem
ber 1, 1999
Place of Birth: Quezon City
Civil Status: Single
Name: Riuben A. Roquero
Nam
e: M
a. Victoria C. Roquero
RESEARCHES UNDERTAKEN
Assessm
ent of Effects of Cotton Fiber Adm
ixture on the Com
pressive Strength of Concrete
The Efficacy and Effects of the Application of a
Mllard Duck Sem
en on Hum
an Hair Follicles
The Assessm
ent of Efficacy of M
oringa Oleifera as a Cleansing Agent
SEM
INARS AND TRAININGS ATTENDED
EnhanCE: On-Site Practices & Solutions for Resilient Structures

ACIP- M apua University S C
April 17,2022
Green Building/Design: Design Through Renewable Energies

ACIP-CITU SC and UAPSA-CITU SC
April 11,2021
Climate Response and Design Strategies: Prepare, Withstand and Rebuild: A Response to Super Typhoons
April 9,2021
UAPSA x PICE 2022: Allied Professions for the Future of Generations Empowering the Aspiring Architects and Civil Engineers as the Future
Builders of the Society
PICE-TIPQC SC and UAPSA TIPQC-SC
aMrch 17,2022
QSTechnovation: Digitalizing the Construction Industry to Achieve Definitive Estimates

aMrch 16,2021
SupremACI 2022: Dive into the Dynamic World of Concrete Technology (Two- Day Webinar Series)
ACIP- TIP QC SC
February 18-19, 2021
Bridge4Dreams Webinar Series 2022
ACIP- BPSU SC and PICE- BPSU SC
February 2022
Ready, Set, Charge: A Virtual Refuel for Aspiring Civil Engineers

PICE-TIPQC SC
Decem
ber 17 , 2021
CONCRETE FORUM 6. 0 Series 2: Innovative Solutions in Concrete and Philippine Build Build Build Program
ACIP- TIP M
NL SC
Novem
ber 27, 2021
Explore the Vision: A Virtual Tour to Different Civil Engineering Specializations

PICE-TIPQC SC
Novem
ber 15 -16, 2021
PAQS 2021 Congress: Create Smart Cities to Help Build the Future Embracing Digitalization and Sustainability Day 1
Philippine Institute of Certified Quantity Surveyors
November 1 4, 2021
Environmental Fair 2021: Earthnify: Unifying the Youth to take Green Actions for the Earth
SSC-TIPQC
October 29,2021
Introduction to the Rim of Quantity Surveying: The Value of Quantity Surveyors and the Global Demand for the Profession
PICQS TIP-QC SC
October 16,2021
PICE QC SC CP
aMrch 27, 2021
ACE-Q TIP-QC EmbrACE-Quality: Building Up Competence and Skills During the New Normal.
M
arch 27, 2021
PICE TIP-QC SC STAAD Workshop Webinar/Workshop

aMrch 18, 2021
ACIP-FSL Webinar Series 2021

January-February 2021
ACIP-FSL Webinar Series 2020

January-February 2021
PICE TIP-QC SC: #FindOutWhereYouBelong Webinar

Decem
ber 18 -19, 2020
DOTr Webinar on Opportunities in the Railway Sector and PRI

Decem
ber 16, 2020
Concrete Industry Innovation: Solution and Sustainability of Structural Designs
ACI T.I.P. Q.C. Student Chapter: Determ
inACI Webinar 2020
Novem
ber 6, 2020
PICE Focus 2020: Understanding the Past, Engineering the Future Forward to the Challenges of the New Normal
2020 PICE Virtual National Convention and Technical Conference
November 2020
Survival Guide: M apua Civil Engineering Edition Webinar

Septem
ber 28, 2020
ACE-Q Day 2020

Technological Institute of the Philippines- Quezon City
aMrch 6, 2020
Society of Scholars Team Building and Leadership Training 2019

Technological Institute of the Philippines- Quezon City
Septem
ber 28, 2019
Quezon City D6 Young Leaders Team Building and Leadership Training

August 2017
Task Force on Youth Development Team Building and Leadership Training 2016
Decem
ber 2016
Quezon City D6 Young Leaders Team Building and Leadership Training 2016
Novem
ber 2016
LEADERSHIP EXPERIENCES, EXTRA CO-CURRICULAR ENGAGEM
ENTS AND VOLUNTEER WORKS
American Concrete Institute Philippines- Council of Student Leaders

Academ
ic Section Head
(January 2022- present)
American Concrete Institute Philippines - TIP-QC Student Chapter

President
(June 2021- present)
American Concrete Institute Philippines - TIP-QC Student Chapter

Academ
ics Com
m
ittee
(August 2020- June 2021)
ACE-Q TIP- Quezon City

External Auditor
(August 2020 June 2021)
Department of Science and Technology- Science Education Institute

R.A. 7687 Scholarship Grantee
ozart Ext. Youth Organization

M
M
em
ber, Board of Directors
(October 2015 present)
ACE-Q TIP- Quezon City

Public Relations Officer
(August 2019 M
arch 2020 )
Student Empowerment for Excellent Leadership (S.T.E.E.L)

M
entee
(August 2019 M
arch 2020 )
San Bartolome High School M

athematics Club
President
(July 2015 M
arch 2016 )
San Bartolome High School M

athematics Club
Vice President
(July 2014 M
arch 2015 )
The Paragon: The Official English Publication of San Bartolome High School
Sports Editor
(August 2014 M
arch 2016 )
Write-it Right: National Campus Journalism Training and Seminar

August 1, 2015
(won 2nd place in Sports Writing- English)
2015 Quezon City District 5 Schools Press Conference
July 2015
(won 1st place in Sports Writing- English)
eMtrobank -M TAP school representative/ contestant for 10 consecutive years of basic education
(2006-2016)
(won 3rd place in Sectoral level in 2008 and 2010; Team Competition category)
(won 2nd place in Division level, 2012; Team Competition)
(finalist in Regional level; 2012 and 2015; Team Competition)
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
College Technological Institute of the Philippines- Quezon City

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
M
ajor in Construction M
anagem
ent
Senior High School arian School of Quezon City

M
Science, Technology, Engineering and M
athem
atics (STEM
)
graduated with High Honors
(June 2016- M
arch 2018)
Junior High School San Bartolome High School

undergone a 4-year Science, Technology and Engineering Program (STEP; formerly known as ESEP)
(June 2012- M
arch 2016)
Elementary Placido Del Mundo Elementary School

graduated as 7th Honorable M
ention
(June 2006- M
arch 2012)
CHARACTER REFERENCES:
Rubelyn R. Soto
School Paper Adviser
Placido Del M
undo E/S
Publications
rubelyn.soto@depedqc.ph
09328446783
Vanessa Anne D. Flaminiano

Administrator
arian School of Quezon City
M
arianschool_qc@yahoo.com
m
I hereby certify that the inform

ation written above is true and correct to the best of m
y knowledge.
Robin Francis C. Roquero

Capstone2group12 - 13338 - 14149523 - Group 12 6 X57he 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Capstone2group12 - 13338 - 14149523 - Group 12 6 X57he 2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Capstone2group12 - 13338 - 14149523 - Group 12 6 X57he 2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Major (Capstone) Design Experience Information

Dela Cruz, John-Kenneth C.

Pepito, China Janel

Roquero, Robin Francis C.

Constructability constraints refer to how the construction project can be

Sustainability Sustainability constraints refer to the use of resources in construction without

The designers aim to design a sustainable structure. Hence, the designers

Limitations: The structure's design life must be at least 50 years.

Risk assessment is defined as the identification and evaluation of risk factors

This constraint refers to the design safety percentages. It is considered a

Limitations: The structure's design safety percentage must be at least one

This constraint refers to the uncertainty percentages difference of story drift.

Limitations: The structure's uncertainty percentage shall not exceed a

The diagonal members of the Chevron Bracing System form an inverted V

Based on local steel market conditions, design practices, and technologically

The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) has devised a company-

Engr. Bailey John Bandiola

RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Engr. Bailey John Bandiola

RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF DESIGN PROJECTS

Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to deliver effective oral presentation in English.

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Delivery Presenter mumbles, Presenter speaks Presenter speaks 3

Engr. Bailey John Bandiola

Engr. Billy Rejuso

RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Engr. Billy Rejuso

RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF DESIGN PROJECTS

Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to deliver effective oral presentation in English.

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Delivery Presenter mumbles, Presenter speaks Presenter speaks 3

Engr. Billy Rejuso

Engr. Cris Edward Monjardin

RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Engr. Cris Edward Monjardin

RUBRIC FOR ORAL PRESENTATION OF DESIGN PROJECTS

Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to deliver effective oral presentation in English.

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Delivery Presenter mumbles, Presenter speaks Presenter speaks 3

Engr. Cris Edward Monjardin

RUBRIC FOR STUDENT DESIGN PROJECT REPORT

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY EXEMPLARY

Engr. Jennifer I. Camino

Intended Learning Outcome: Ability to deliver effective oral presentation in English.

Engr. Jennifer I. Camino

BS in Civil Engineering CE Design Project 2 CE42S3 2nd 2021-2022

Performance Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent

Engr. Jennifer I. Cam

RUBRIC FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN

BS in Civil Engineering Course: CE

Performance Very Poor Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Good Excellent

Engr. Jennifer I. Cam ino

RUBRIC FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION

China Janel Pepito, John-Kenneth Dela Cruz, Joshua Raym