Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Warehouse Modernization and Layout Planning Guide
Warehouse Modernization and Layout Planning Guide
I
I
I
;
0530-LP-529-0000
M WarehouseModernization
and
Layout Planning Guide
I8. I 18- 1
1 8 .2 Ana lys is Procedure ta- 2
1 8 ,3 Eleoents of Analysis t8- 2
18.4 l,lodular Layouts L8- 5
1 8 .5 B u 1 1 di n g C o 6E 18 5
18.6 r8- 9
18.7 Storage Equipment Cost l8-r3
r8.8 l'|ter ial s ltandling Eq!ipnen. cost t8-18
18.9 Cost Equat ions t8-t8
t8.10 T r a n $ a ct i o n / I n v e n t o r y ( T / I ) R a r i o L8-18
18.1l P a I l e t S y st e n s t 8-26
18.i2 B i n n a bI e s o r d e r P i c k i n s S y s t e m s t8-29
t8.l3 R a c k a bl e s O r d e r P i c k i n g S y s c e n s t8 36
19.I I9- I
)9.2 B ui l d i n a C o s t V a r i a t i o n s l9- 3
t9. 3 Pallet Rack and Shelving Cost Varla t lon s 19-
r9.4 Vehicle Cost Var iat ions I9-
1 9 .5 L a b o r C o st v s r i s t i o n s for PalLet Sysceins l9- 5
I9 .6 Labor Co6t var iat ion$ for
Order Pi ck in8 Systens l9-
1 9. 1 Labor cost Variations for
order Picking Systens l9 7
19.8 Fire Protec t ion I9- 7
E n v i r o n n e n c aI C o n t r o 1 s t9- 8
20.I D ef i n i t i o n o f P r o b l e n 20- l
2 0. 2 SeSmentation of Operarions 20- 4
2 0. 3 Covered Dry Storage 20- 6
20.4 Order Picking 20- 9
20.5 Support Functions 20- t2
2 0. 6 Shipping and Receiving 20-r2
20.7 P r e s e r v a ti o n , P a c k a g i n g , P a c k i n g , C r a t i n g 20-12
20.8 Preliminary Bui lding uodule Layout 20-13
20.9 Refined Bui lding Layout 20-13
NON STACKAELT SHAPE
-E
STACKABL L I M I T E DH € I G H T E
STACXABL
TYPICAI- EX,AI/flPn-ES
OF' SITACKAtsNN-NTY
Figure 2-9
2-23
] !
{\\*\
,\P\ z
o \\i -
\\--\
)\L
1\\i l
t z\\, l F.
.D
F=\
\ACt t'l
()
h ()
()
#, Pqy
3/ CJ F
7t ..i
v,t
o
(J- F
-.1
L)
o
J a
FI
! ie
l-l"l",l-l-l
i-\ i//--
P ZtlP/
{i,,*
'r//r/
'xsilul
e
F EI
o)llo /
6
d lzI
lo/
;> //F I
L! :)
)z
Iigurc 2-10
2-25
5.3,1 S e l e c ti v e R a c k
The conventional bearn lype psllet isck consiste of structural uprights joined
by the pa1lec bearos \ t h i c h actually s u p p o r t t h e p a l l e t a n d 1 o s d . B e c a u se the
standard Navy pallet rack is t h e s a m e d e p E h s s t h e p a 1 1 e t ( 4 0 " ) , l o a d s night
have a tendency to fall t h r o u g h t h e b e a l ! o p e n i n g . T h e r e f o r e , Pallet s u pport
nembers ( load bars ) i r h i c h s p a n b e t w e e n t h e b e a n s a r e r e q u i r e d t o p r o vide
support for rhe 1oad, See CSA/FSS S p e c i f i c a t i o n M - R - 0 0 4 5 "Racks, S t o r age,
Loaded Pal let ".
The drive-in rack structure cons ts of vertical posts with cantilever suP-
ported pa1let rails, This type of srtucture can be Mde eilher one p a l l e t or
several pallets deep. The single palLet arrangenent can b e u s e d i n Place o f
th€ conventional bean rack and is widely used in high r i s e S / R s y s t e n s , l , h e r e
the sdditional supporl of lhe one load per slot design is i n p o r t a n t ' t r t h e n d e _
signed several pallets deep, the syslem becones a high d e n s i t y s c o r a g e s y s t e n ,
similar to the autonated deep bulk system described in Seccion 3, but uaing
conventional fork lift trucks instead of automated equipment. T h i s arranae-
dent is shoqn in Fisure 6 25.
The fork lift truck operatioa in a drive-in rack must be confined carefully so
that ic does not bdnp tbe racks and danage nerchandisc or equipment. In soDe
cases, guide rails are used to prevent this problen. In addition, because of
the rigidity of the layout pattern generated by drive-in racks, tbey have a
tendency to develop excessive honeycombing and encoureae locked stock. They
also reduce the fte{ibility of the sarehousc storaSe operation. In general, a
drive in rack performs the san-. function as floor storage for itens lthich can-
not be self-supportins in stacks. The alternstive to these racks is the use
of self-supporcing pa1let fixtdres as discussed earrier, The use of drive-in
racks should be minimized, atrd che problem of non-stackable loads should be
dealt with using speciar pal1et support devices.
6.3.4 S a f e t y c o n si d e r a t i o n s
the design and 6eleccioo of a particular pa11et rack req,:ires a great deal of
engineering analysis and judgnent. A psllet rack is a structure and nust con-
form to structural engineering design praccices and principles, It is essen-
tial that pallet racks conforrn to the structural design procedures of the A.der-
ican Iron and Steel Instilute and the Anericen Institute of Steel Construc-
( Lwnl to page 6 - 3A)
6-28
]LI\T]E SIIOR.AGE PNCKNNG SYS1IEM
( T O C O N V E Y O RA N O / O R P A C K I N GO P E R A T I O N )
Figure 8-I0
I , 17
olrlY Ti^nluctrot i^ll rivaltTott ouAtlltY altnic aurlorraAiaA
Itrrarrrtt rLua iaca||rt ( u r r i L o A o S0 i s H a L f lt0 cttrt x€tG|ll
rN uxtT Lo 0l 0a tT€l aor€! '
PRrL!rDrliY 5Y9ttr
SYST'EM SEN-ECT'IONPR.OCEDURE
. EXXSTNNGts{JIN-DING.
figure l5-2
15 - 6
a
.]:: ..
:;'3':.-;:
Table 18-II
L8 - 2I
cALUul,ArroA OF
sA-li.eLll CAI-CULATION
SA}PLE u! A COSTuuSr EQUATION
lquArru
Counterba lance Truck
2 high pP aa ll ll ee ll s t o r a 8 e
Building CoBl
Co6t Equationc
w i t h B u i l d i n g C o st
( $ 1 5 . 0 6 + S2 . 9 7 ) I n v e n t o r y + ( 9 2 5 5 . 8 0 + $ 4 4 . 0 8 ) T r a n s s c t i o d=s
A n n u a l s y s t e o C o s t = $ 1 8 . 0 3 1 + 9 3 1 0 . 8 8T
Table 18-I2
18-22
COST EQUATIONS
BINNABLESORDERPICKINC SYSTEMS
St o r a g e
Systeo Nee Constructlon Existiog BLrilding
Table I8- 20
18 - 37
t::
Li
Table L8-21
r8-38
5 U : S T O R A GT
E J N I TL E V E L S
lsu
: 40
30
2 SU
I 5U
ANNUAN- tsUNN,DNNG
COS1I
M A N U A LP I CK C A R T
E I N N A B L E SO R D E RP I C KI N G
22-t3
;
]-,
Fi g u r ' l-l i
D-33
HEIGHTS
A N DD O C K
A N DR A I L V E H I C L E
T Y PI C A LT R U C K
48 48 6to8
Stake Body \2
| 3'-0" r3 ' - 6 " \3 8 to 12
High cube Van 32 38
'Furni ture van 2\ l3'0" t3'6" 3 0( c ) 8
Low Boy
20
20 2\ l__'' 3 0( c ) 8 to l0
ll lr 5 (d)
Box Crr 4r
46 52 !B 5 to 5 (d)
Reefer Rail Cdr
Ranseof 48"-52".
(b) 50" if serving scmis onlY'
r'rmp to elcvate
N o n i n a t 4 8 ' , - 5 0 ' r d o c k r e c . , r n m e n d ewdi t h e x t e r i o r
truck to provide nominal 10" d o c k h e i q h t '
clearance belween
(d) Hinimumlenqth available determined bv required
rai I car .nd dock.
2l - l5
23.5.7
Typical overhead doors for truck docks are 8 to l0 feet high and 9 feet {ide'
An 8 foot high door sill typically provide a 12 foot high openins f r o n the
groond to top of door, Tlis leaves approximately 15 to i8 inches o f u n u s a ble
lrailer height due to door clearance when loading a standard l3'-6" t r a i l e r .
A 9 foot high doot allous sufficient space lo load highly conPacted loads w i t h -
out encouncering overhead restrictions due to door height' A l0 fool high
door will permit full access to the highest truck' Figures 23-11 ana 2l-18
show typical dinensions for a flush dock door.
lnterior layout of docks includ.:s loading and unloadins areas as 'e1l as stas
ins and accumulation areas. Figure 23-19 shoss typical insirle dimcnsioos for
a dock. These dimensions allow for touline and load staginS a.eas.
Load acctrmulation space nust be estinat.:d dsinS typical shiPnent and t.uck
Ioadi g data. The anount of material to bc accumulated will rrcrPase as Lhe
order picking rate exceeds the loading rate. The space aill rea.h a P.ak ind
then decrease as order pickins ends and shipping renoves the backlos. SPice
estimates can be developed by maintaining a qork sheet sinilar to that rn Frg
ure 23-20. The rorkins day is divided into time blocks and the amount of rato
rial picked and shlpped is recorded. The dafa is convcrtPd lo area usins dP -
sity and area convr:rsion factors derived fron the charrcteristics of materiaL
processed by a part iculnr frcility.
Dock design is conpleted by the addition of accessories which enh.rnce the per
formance, safety, and s e c u r i t y o f d o c k o p € r r a t i o n s . D o c k I e v e l e r s p e r m i t fork
trucks co rapidly load snd unload Lraiters by providing a perEanently mounted
bridge to the trailer ehich adjusrs to elevation diffete ccs betre€n the trail
Tr,o factors are crirical in dock leveler seloccion. The first factor is
lensth, rhich d e t e r n i n e s t h e m a x i m u mg r a d e v h i c h n u s t b c n . s o t i a t e d b y a t o r k
cruck. A naxioum grade of l0Z should not be exceeded. Recomnrc'Dded ock lev-
eler 1€n8ths for various dock heights 'ere Iisted previously in Tabt-.23-9.
The second factor in dock leveler selection is capacity. Dock levelers rre
subjecled to substantial inpact loads causcd by the notion of the fork truck,
truck and load treighc, and approach g.ade. Table 23-10 provides a sumnary of
estinated life based on capacity, use, and gross load, The life of a siven ca-
pacity dock teveLer, as sholrn in the tab1e, can ranae froD less than 5 years
to oore than 20 years, d€pending on use, gross load, and rated capacity.
Dock \teather seals (Figure 23-21) are a useful energy saving accessory shich
seals the gap bet\reen the truck and door and reduces the infiltra!ion of out-
side air into the uarehouse. Weatherseals are available as eithe! foaE pad
door seals or flexible nenber dock shelters. Each type has parlicular advan-
tages and drsadvanEages.
('h]I+i rc plge 23 - 11)
STANDARD
OPERATION
SEQLENCE
C o u n t e r b a l a n c e dF o r k T r u c k - P a l 1 e t S t o r a g e
n.aruri^n s..n"ri.
Activity
frequ-.ncy Tola1 Time
D e s cr r p c i o n P e . C y c1 e Pe. Cycle
L D o c u m e nI P r o c e s s i n g 0.1t0 t 0.t10
Count prtces/process docs 0.880 I 0.880
3 Uou t/Drsm.'unt 0.450 I 0.450
RlxT,l I Rr(Ll)
5 0.120 L 0.120
Lift Losd 0.050 t 0.050
7 0,082 t 0.082
8 0. 090 I 0 . 0 90
9 R2xLl I R 2 (r , l )
l0 0.030 0.030
i.l Travel t o s a a ai n g R 3 x DI t R 3 ( D r)
t2 Stop 0.028 I 0.028
l3 RlxL2 L Rt(L2)
0.120 I 0.120
t5 0.050 t 0.050
t6 0.082 I 0.082
tl R2xL2 I R2(L2)
l8 0.030 I 0.010
l9 Travel to scoraSe R3xD2 t R3(D2)
20 0.090 1 0.090
2l I n t e r m e di a t e starts/stops 0.055 0.055(n)
Suminary Equation
F-1