42 2 6 2010 A Ae eR Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Vol. 42, No. 6 Nov., 2010 SPLAT A hE Se TS HEE? KU BBB Ret Hes ERE TSC OTE ANAESM, <% 100088) RE MTL TIEM SAL Heo LET RLU. a LB. pee AER SS KAN YW I Da AR ASS ME MD, tS eA RS A CH. ERI, AL A ei, Be RAE mT LIAS — pL Js BAS, FR A ol A EO CALDERA, BUR Se RELL, mb LER. CLR HOT F, DE PCIE RAMEN — AU. APTA RAR ORT ALBRE ROR A TERE. ROAD APSE LAI STH Nh ALM TE (Ln PROTA BL Bs DUAR OMT EAE, 4 HO ALA HEAG He A HES RA. AERP Rae a mT EI A A, RAR SIUM, MtNERH EE, PARAL, Pe, iMRI PHARS: 0947.5 LMR: A 1 3 ALPEN Te CE PAB, ATE AF LA DIR Se A. BRM AIR SIL Bi li) HFK HAMMAM DL CBR, (Eth TR aR OR il AAR eS Ae AR SHEE ADE, WR ERE PETAL, GT Hugoniot RK AMARASIES 4, ce ROASTS (AISTIR 2-6]. FEF Linde #1 Schmidt!”), Butcher, Bonnan'l, Resnyansky® SWF T LALGB. GAL SB, SALMA he EHR AIDA, Boadel”l TT SLAM AF RMS. Btw TS Pastine “ (!, Herrmann’, Oh #il Persson, 541 HE HO) EASE, ASH, Wang!) Fat aE BEYER RR AE ALE, Massoni %E U4) xf FABRE RS AO EMRE 4 FBLA, Boshoft- Mostert fll Viljoen!) et JARABE ITM T Hee. HET Pe aR aL SAE AR ZL RUMP Li ah FI — ARLE O18), fH Baer #i Nunziato!®l (fj — ABLE, Drumheller!) 94 AMVEBAL, Romenskiil!®) (YEAR BUTE. fee FAA PST 3 oP I, SEP LE AOL THEE, TOR Oa Bt Ha Bch HE ayaATRE RTP NS, Drumheller!!! Aye "2008-07-22 WHITE 1 He, 2010-02-07 ese ‘SCM: 0459-1879(2010)06-1138-11 AR GE AE AT 3K; Romenskiil!®! ABA 4S 47 ERA BH {A Maxwell VARA. Sc MeOT SAN IE MH AZ — OAL RY ELE EA RS aH A EL UR: SEMA AL EM. HUE EGR ADHERE WI. TLC DOR, SRSA A E78 io AH Be — JEAN AL RS. APD EBM aT DLs 2 EO A SIE AG) — SEE ANU a, (ELST ED A MIR TD RARE ST RAMA, HERE SEE BT SAL, HMR DE, eR PRR RH CCITT HEAR 3 Se ATA A. HE SHAN ZHM AN, BMRA, BREDA SY ie BR AT AL. WER TAS SiG RRL, ARATE IAT, BA A BM ARTE A BR, Cha Ps a AT HDG. GSP, ORD Le BL UAT Le ak hs a A EEE A BS A, AWARE. MAT RL— AK Lit PMR AREF BUD IT:. IRBPRLP Ta Es UES BUM 3 Fa EAGS 02 a A RE, Fal EE FESR RUC TE AOL, MERIC A Mh BEI (AE. EA, RAMU TN 8 AL TEAL BTL EATER. 2) (RSE AREAL (10702010, 10776018). +51 ALM BERNE & (20000102005, 2009BOL01012) FLA Me NTE 2) Femail: Xu-Aiguofiapem.ac.en% 6 9 SAUTE ELL Ub SEE SUR 9), ti] Sulsky 9-20) HE” Sit FE IaH BAIL Ufa 2-281 fey 1p ARTA Bi Z | RRS TIRE HEE PES TCHR MY (20-28), 0B TAA AGHES AEA, WR ALAB AS PT READ TEE ST RRC WT AY REST MABE P78) he wD HEARST LP FL 19 ale gf (20-30) 1 MRADEOEA BB CETTE D, MERON UCAS BIN, SHIN PLDI US, MAS HEA Hct my, LD op, FHI v, ENE py HE; TYR RAH, Ba ASRS 1 PADRE vy AIMS oT. HEE NTE, HBTS p DTT ADT ET TE RRB 1, AR WS ¢ DORM ITTE, BRAS PAG Wi es aE ASR Ae EB PLT AU, ORT FUDD AT AO TT. 48 ‘S/N ah 3 RI SI, A (ig AA A. BH ise (24.28) ADD a, ARSON A TEAS a ft, SRDS TA SRE. ECD AEP RE WY wit pay o+pb=0 @ SUP p (RENE, v GHIE, bIRRIEH. Ef BST), 8G OEP A IL RHE, TE (1) MB ERAT LG dv . [ote ae [0 (o-n—Har + foe baa =0 @) la Heep 0 RAR AIR, Me RUE, t RAS. THAR AER RIN, BRA hy plz) = 7 mp6(e ~ 25) @) FETT AR (3) RAK (2) REPT EE BRP 7 PEE IE HAPS LAR A de; _ pint 5 pent et @ VRSEIAE : BALA ae EEO EC 1139 See, FP AN FES SPAR REE AB ID AVA BD Fo (f= Lome (PN e x ) (A) = OM + Fi pai BR (8) AB, FARE (F,)° RACHEL I EL Be Sh LTE RAG ESCO RRM (4) ATLAS AY i i. ‘DOL aS TT HR AD BB oh Bik HE 9H a. Bardenhagen|, Hu 7% (9) Syg@uy T 11 Bens ERE. ALTE AL PEN. WEA wR AAC A TL ABE HT A REE, PA ES RE “EAT (DAE SA PU, A ik J FD 18, FOP B77 (EH AYA Coulomb MEH 7). HE SUR ATEY SBI SCHR [27-28]. 2 EA AAA, ALAS A A a Se HA von Mises WHEW aH Ye von Mises IIHR AAT (BJy — Y? = 0) Gi ALZ HIV e Ra E WAN, Seep Y ARAB TE NLRINID, to RAIN Dak a(=o+ PI) WROBEL IE Y BE SHE ATK HO AE ER ESM. 4 BJ2 > Y? i, CPR DB TEMA ARE de, ATLL PAWS dep = (V3J2—¥)/(3G+ Bean), SEP G Al Bean JERS UVF HCE. ULYEHE DUAR dW, = dep -Y 4 IRE AE. JESR P iL Mie-Griineisen RAEI # = (Cu+ Dp + Sy) (1-H = (Ch+ Dp! +848) (1 wt) + 196 © SEB, WWREBIE, w = p/p -1 = W/V —1, 7 = 60/2, C = pace, D = C(2A—1), § = ClA- 1)(GA=1). MRS RURR AS PEARL PSP PARAL Bs fe SOBER TRAD von Mises Jif ARES ANF AL EMR HL. UE FER RE HCE RU SERED iit, IRE von Mises “PATI. AUR RO, AZ TED ME FR, WRU AF bal ARIE, SUH DY ESRECDIM, HE ARASH RE. SRL BAR AS Ty PES th. HEAT AEP, ULB VE BT FC i FLBELIBE SR & FLA RP ots wa 9 — A A.140 a SRL: BAL po = 2700kg/m’, FEAL B = 69GPa, FAL v=0.33, HG EAL DY oo= 120MPa, ULB Btn = 384MPa, ji oo = 5.35km/s, AA cy= 880J/(ke-K), AMES AR k= 237 W/ (ork). EBLE, RAST PLLA BLAM A WATE. AR, ae HOY A, A BAUR UR RE. feoCP, Se ne — SE a PT TAME AT LAL PRMTRETAR SON, HT CGB Ri eS Th ADE REAGAN PA, Hid SE at KBR. 3 RWARSOH EATER, SIL ill ee se PLLA MEK — Se Me BOLD A RIE SOR AY. FURIE: (1) HE RAIA ATS (OE JA); (2) JEL BALA A: aR th — BA AE PRA REBLAS AG RY AT TE BR; (3) — PERI RE RAE — TEER, HO PRD BEE, MR WMS TN. Pe BR BALI A, PRES ATP TE NE RATE BH TATE. EAR OR RE, TAL ASP SBN BB OILS, LARD MA BRP GAT ALBARAS. BY, AR A BY FESR BSA. MST LRA, RMS AL RHEE MART. LOREM A BR A fa, — ploo FER p Bl po S51 AEA EDS. (eR 0250 S00 750. 1000 @ * i 2010 42 FRM FCA LN SAD PK Tooid ABR ERCA Nooig RE. MPT BL Aa FEAL Hy AYA I ET RS FL ATA. EAT PY y = 0, PARRA TE a ART ZAI t=0, JE SPL Sy, ED LIA. 3.1 FUMES A= 0.5 ANT fd 1 StH TILBRAE A = 0.5 MPRA 1000 m/s AY NE See NHL PRP AA] t=500ns Bf AAU SA OE. PPE AA OY pam, FESR MIC GPa, HEME K. AN ATL, iS PER Li EASED LAS, de SS RATE, eT BOR TT ALE, PTE AL Wi. PPT REE SLAP CRA) ATP RTARAS, BORE. ANE. HR. BURR PTR. PAS (URE TER (AHA Hugoniot KA. LAME MER AVS: FR. AE TE ATER BOR. Oy TRUM HR ART LBS ea} AG, CE A(a) A (b) #P, ARAE ARETE IS) Sy O~50GPa Al 300K ~500K. Sie) HM ibe te eT I BUTLIABY, LIZ cE, (AL SPM, BR STEVIA ACB BR Te REAR AS. FLA ‘ODF a A A, ATL YP STL, LP SPE, A RPS SPREE RE, AER IE ap DRA I, BE SAE. AMLADE HEA AG A PE SAFI RAE. ALY, AEP at Am, ARE A ea A DU DI PL 1 RADU AON (a) ALAM (b) FA KOHALA am, RAUL GPa, BRIER K Fig.1 Configurations with pressure contour (a) and temperature contour (b) of the target body. The units of length, pressure and temperature are jm, GPa and K, respectively1994-2022 China A 6M eREIRR : Se UbL Rte ARE mat SA hi AR BTiS PR Ah Se DB AES) Sh TPR AA Ay BTA, RK HOMBRE RA A FUR BE SA ARB. CEM FE LERNER PETRA EAT A BAD EPARLAT AAD EH. MBL ret ae SECA AC SEAR . FRR, URES GE MEA Py PDE L.A, TS eb OS {Ey EE. id 2 Sa TA 1 eae ea Ah aR P, WET, BR p MGR TRE y OR U, BOL (DB SH EE SS AE ERT (100m < y < 900m), KM (10pm < y < 600 jm), PRK TIT (100 pm < y < 300 ym) PY fF (fi. PIER eH Tak 3 AP ED SRA RE. ATL, OE ARO SR FAINT, SIE. HRB TA EA SEER HES, POT RIEIE BLA, ZA icra = som = som 2 aon ‘800 1000” 1800 2600 plecm-9) 270t ‘08504000 1002000 PERG LW, LUE AT IL, Mba L ILA SRE Ae RGR FE A REET, FESR IEDR Ai BEEaEL BY BO PALL, ATA FS HEE. FR BAAS — Be SR. ME Ae TAB RE AALAPABA APP IE. 4 t=2021 ns 224i, [RGR P AD EIS p HER FPO DE, sak ee OAL BEBE A ea de TG, RPA T Lk a at ak SD MEE TSE RE Uy BM RBATS, th URLS, RE BP BAAS TE A PRAM. AN 2, IADR Sa a a PK DAS FELT 5 1S 9 DAE BE PR EAE BE FRA AE MUD AY mT Hea) ALAR BPR (A Tea A Ba BFE It). AA AIREY ER, WE RK, PAR FSR I FES FLAP LAE RR. AB A ROT BL, NE DR BG ly, UAH a aie 0 860 1600” 18002000 (ad 2 ake 8 Ne AH, Fig.2 Locally averaged state variables versus time A TARR RS BBE YBN PEIS, CER 3 PRA TB RAR. BEI. ME ALTE SEL Sp LARD BE HBOS FD TEAL A. LS 2 IIRL. FT, AQMD LAN MARE BL, BEE APE EMU BURA, WTI PE. de t= 775s WAL, FRR. BE HE AR CET Rhy (ROBIE, 2A OE at A PETE. de RAL A, A TL ademic Journal Electronic Publishin BAL TI RTE AE AR BERR HE SS FREER, ULE IED DOGHE SUP BR. Sima AM BUS, Ia. EAD ‘RUE JE ECP BBE, TRL A LE FEA IM. AS 3 BD, AT AN LEA A PUSHHLTL EADY, i 4 MOSHE aT okies NTA. Sy TERRA ASE A EA MR TS1142 A ca 2010 42 std for p/(gem=8) ‘0 601000" 1800” 2000 tins 08601000” 76002000" eee ‘0 5601000 1800” 2000 ‘0 860 1000” 18002000" Vel 3s a eT aE Fig.3 Standard deviations (std) of state variable versus time Ay, tee 4 HE TA RE A SPAT SK iE EA BARREL IT CL, FT SK HER UA, KBR pm, MUAY em/s. FT Yk, PADD FE EBC AER I, LF EERE ss PHRF EMERG Nh, BLE EE A, ERE SPRL, Meat CRIT OA eS POPE HFEF OTL ETL. SRA REL Bh, SLUR AEE SRE | OM. S| SS RLF GF ae TG | Bh AT eR a eh As A eM PRM: R= |\Vxul AD =|V-ul. ii PRR TTR BENE A, Ja RT FUSE AN. HEAT SNIE (R) RRB AO RRTEER, MITTEE (D2) HT ESA PERI IRS| REI, ER 5 eth T Deitel HRI JaiP RISE ATG SARL AL CT OA. PEO SAY, adnate 4 Jew BE 9 AY VSL (1). ty 2. China Academic Journal TELA Ay ns. ARR JL, aS CREA i a i 8 9 ASAT BBL ASA LARA RAL, A A TR ALA 25. BU REDCRIRLR PAN eae Ae APTA NT BL. WEEK, TL wy. 150) soos Sa fe 100 200 300 Pi 4 ORF RRB. KEIM pm, REREALL om/s Fig. Field of the particle velocity in the shocked portion. ‘The unit of length is um and that of velocity is em/s BY 5 Re. ee i Re 0 Pig.5 Local mean squared values of divergence, rotation and strain rate versus time ouse. All rights reserved. _http://www-enki.netBoM MRSS: SAL Nhe te OIE, 1143, 2%), a om 2 fs cee 2 0 | of: . o. ‘00 +1800 LS SCARCE ME. 1 A Ay SL (AE) Fig.5 Local mean squared values of divergence, rotation and strain rate versus time (continued) 3.2 he aM AFR Y 2.00 g/cm?, 2.80 g/cm? FI 2.76 g/em ANDRA RLM Ti AE SENTRA 6 Ses TAR SPL BTR EL ES BL FR SE a 1 Jd PH 1 TEAL TDA BU PCSSRAD BE Jy 800 parm, DHE ti RE HH 1000 m/s, 800m/s #l 500m/s. BAS AT Sh, Pith WEARER, PRL ENE, ER, BO aA Fi; URL FH ES EL AS AER RNTTIA. (ik 3 AUNTIE F, BO i SARE FR SR Sly 7.2GPa, 5.05 GPa Fi 2.3 GPa; i Pleven Fd © Alo rea LP IA Fig.6 Locally averaged state variables versus time under various shock strengths tel 7 See TSI 6 HART MCA a OE Baa Tale HH ae. 7 ATI, bk ‘Ea a BG SR A TDK, 7 PATE AEN: SERRA MRR BG, 1994-2022 China Academic Journal Electronic Publishin MIRAI MEDC, ASE HERE ETL, AE 1500ms AY 3 Ape Li BB Et WA PSH BE} a 623K, 508K fil 384K, 3£5 1000 m/s PP itis ERT AOE Rb PRA. LD SE FLORES, Har tink BE A 3 LLORAS SE HBA = ACHM JeUHREHF Je BARA BN, SRC, de SEY GE SAA RT Ls RB, A FR BREA E25) 1.000 mm/s Hib AEE RE SLA A Bik MAREK. 800) oe exo m/s 1.000 am /s I Lisa SEE MEAD HLF SIE EL 3 at Wy ‘bac Dee SSE AR, RAD Dy TD EP ARS, MARRS, APR. tg SLE 4.naa sta for P/GPa std for p/(gem3) tos * ® 2010 2 3 ¥ BL 7 Aan ie tO, Fig.7 Standard deviations (std) of state variable versus time bel 8 eh tht TAS a a RP Ja BCE Je SHUG 5 Jai INES 9 A 38 AN BE HE PER, HE 3 09 a Ey 800 perm, BSE TH RES SY 1000m/s, 800m/s #1 500m/s. AT, #1 ST a SE RPG, HS A at HRN fe HE 3] ‘5 esno ms 6. 5) 4 3 «wryprot t Stumm 8604600 F800 tfe8 Socom (s2)/10? aun wooo 1800 oso tins Fed @ AVA ee. ee HTB i Fig Local mean squared values of divergence, rotation and strain rate versus time 3.3 FURR ARE FUBR BE ATK ANREP IS De A HE EMG. WT MMT EH, Bo eu T MURA EE Hy 1000 m/s YEE FFL IRIE SP 0.50, 0.41 Al 0.09 AURA FESR. SEE. MRE. HS AY J HG EA CER AK, “FS A at SCARY fod Ae BE A PRE A ELAR A.A, Hh WEAR, SEI Ha I BRE MOTT GARR AL Ft RRL AR A, UL 6 PAP RE ‘me. eyo o ‘860 «1000-1300 FALE EL a AL DR A A AP A, AVAIL 600m. AUT, ALORAERGIA, IR AMR. GMM, MMAR. LEK 9 SP, i 3 PRE OR NE RT Aa SAR BR SRD UY 7.3GPa, 89GPa Hl 16.9GPa, Ry FEI6M HY 2.90g/om8, 2.94 fem? Al 3 a eg AR ITIL — ELAN FE. 48 120m BE 3 3 ALDINE 10 FA ELI 618K, 606K Ail 493K. FLBRIS A, Fi SADE AA He HEE AS FFL, TLBRIOLG 1, RIN eK EAB. 3 — A 1700 1600 ns ofeem-9) ‘8000 #2000” 76000 ys ek 9 FLING Son iP (R , Fig.9 Locally averaged state variables versus time under various porosities 0 4000 Pel 10 3th T jE 9 ARENA Oe EY RP BBY DIE MORITA. HEAT I, i +e Ha DRA PHAR, SED tN FR aR. EE. PSE LF RE OT I OP Fa BEI. IE "PFLBUE 0.09 2 NAT RLF REMI SEE. I a ) 08 a Sennen 038) 4 228 005 500) 1000 1500 Usd 10 a i te at Fig.10 Standard Deviations (std) of state variable versus time ‘PPAR: ALB Rt teh MAE, 145 BCE RY 9 FP ANZEHW W: FLBRAE I 0.09 ARE RP, He RS ME. ARE TPR FE, LP AE ADE EL SLAVE ELIE aso. 9 RH JB, CP LSA OIE, FLOORS, PSE, FR BRIRIR, PRAISE, 115 Dil 2-12) oh A RE — BO roms 0 0 850 1200 600 FA ALBR EES, AOR RAE: ARRAS ALPE. RI 4. A MTL} aM nH ze AF, dE Bt fA 1300ns 2c 41, FL I5E 0.09 2 1 AT ERME Ze FPO IK, RAE eT BRST SEE A TR. 200 wl * seaemanis std for T/K FBO os1146 A * 2010 #8 42 RL 11 SoH Ta BRE EE ERE A BEL SELES RL AUN Se eR. ATT, “SE AL A SB, TATE EA AB LE A — SEWED PABA, BULAN AT S HALAL (R108 ts 8 02n yeeco m/s 7 we 24 236 2 sii TSe Be 4 Bale 2 5 ° saguennnnaeesnensas 0 860 1000 1800 tins REAM ACAD HEX. RE RE BiEK: SM 5 $ seo amis 8 Pas 2 sl te. gf = 4. 5 a ; O| CecSttmmarananesnen 3016801600 ioe 2 i. Bom 04 £2 = ue) a + (Dy 3 a (4) & 86010007800 ts aE 11 OARS eB ie EC Fig.11 Local mean squared values of divergence, rotation and strain rate versus time FL, AES BRIE ARR, ERE SRA BEAR AS AE, AP iL EBL AP RET DIA BI — a a A aS. CETL ENTER F, RRA RB AAA DIY. 9, BASRA, J SEAS IE. FRR. BRIE. BL PSUS EE 29 A — SO SD ATT BLOT TEL. 46% SAY ARLES EA AREAS URE. BS T FLU ea PUEDES KAR Bee CE BE. RR EAE A FEA. ROEDER, Bo RATT DGB) Ait olah 1 PaaS, SERA SASL A i Ae 9 I NE 4 A. HEL BE TERK, MIA BRE, RRB TIRE ER AS, ANTEATER IP TBE, ANE EP EL POMP, ERE REMUS. WC BLT Ha At, PORT ERK, HT RAR BBL, ea AAR AR FEBS FLA BL RE AW PARENT DN il, ALB — SE ATE FSF PE BRIA HT CL Be rs HR AED BE ROH 2B Je SCS AE. FRR. HELE RLF SARE Sh i — A PMD A JE RON TATE AL. TT RE FURIE FSBO ATR. NBC Bowe, PRS IU EE, na eS PVE Ain SE AG ASAE. ANSEL Ty Ty ANIC, ARH SP RL A AL BERS . it CWP EMR AMAR CMB. $4 xm 1 Nestarenko VF. Dynamics of Heterogeneous Materials, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001 2 Linde RK, Schmidt DN. Shock propagation in nonreactive porone lid. Journal of Applied Physics, 1906, 37(8) $259- aa 3 Butcher BM. Shock-wave compaction of porous aluminum Journal of Applied Physics, 1974, 45(9): 3864-3875 4 Bonnan 8, Herel PL. Bxperimental characterization of quasi static and shock wave behavior of porous aluminum, Journal ‘of Applied Physics, 1996, 85(11): 5741-5749 5 Resayansky AD, Bourne NK. Shock-wave comprestion of porous material. Journal of Applied Physics, 2004, 95(4) 1760-1769 6 Bonde RR. Dynamic compression of porous tungrten. Journal of Applied Physics, 1960, 40(9)- 3781-3785. 1 Pasting DJ, Lombardi M, Chatterjee A, ot al. Theoretic! shock properties of porous aluminum. Journal of Applied Physica, 1970, 41: 3144-3147B68 PPSBNSG : BTL She HED RATE aT 8 Herrmann W. Constitutive equation for the dynamic com paction of ductile porous materials. Journal of Applied Physics, 1968, 40 (8): 3490-3498 ‘Oh Ki, Persson PA. Equation of of high-pressure shock Hogoniot data. Physics, 1989, 68(10): 3852-856 te for extrapolation Journal of Applied 10 Wu Q, Jing FQ. Unified thermodynamic equation of state for porous materials in @ wide pressure range. Applied Physics Letters, 1985, 67(1): 48-51, 21 Wu Q, Jing FQ. Theromodynamic equation of state and apli- ils. Journal ‘ation to Hugoniot predictions for porous i of Applied Physics, 1906, 88): 4348-4349, 12 Geng HY, Wu Q, Ten Het al. Extension of Wading equa: 18 Wang 2P. Void-containing nonlinear mate u F ton of state fr highly porous materials: thermoelectron based ‘theoretical model. Journal of Applied Physics, 2002, 92 (10) 5024 5029 subjoct to bigh- rate loading, Journal of Applied Physics, 1997, 81(11): 7219- ma 4 Masson J, Sourel R, Baudin G, et l. A mechanistic model for shock initiation of solid explosives. Physics of Fluid, 1998, 118): 710-736 8 Boshoff-MostertL, Viljoen HJ. Comparative study of analytic methods for Hugoniot curves of porous materials. Journal af Applied Physics, 1900, 86(3): 1245-1254 26 Beer MR, Nunsiato JW. A two-phase mixture theory for the Aefiagration o-detonation transition in reactive gran ma terial. International Journal of Multiphase Plow, 1986, 12(6): 861-889 17 Drumheller DS. The theoretical treatment of « porous eid using © mixture theory. International Journal of Soide and Structures, 1978, 146): 443-456 18 Romenthit EL. Relaration model for deteribing the strain of 1 x porous materials. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Techni- cal Physics, 1088, 29(5): 735-738 9 Hsrlow PH, The particle in-oll computing method for fui ynamics. Methods in Computational Physics, 1064, 3: 310 45, Sulsky D, Chen Z, Schreyer HL. A particle method for history Aependent materials, Computer Methods sn Applied Mechan scx and Bngincering, 1994, 118(1-2): 179-196 Sulsky D, Zhou 83, Schreyer HL. Application of partile-n- ‘oll method to solid mechanics. Computer Physics Comms cations, 1998, 87(1-2): 236-252 22 kee, HE, Sb. TRGB IU. SD"PLAA, 2000, 39(2): 1-96. (Zhang Xiong, Liu Yan, Ma Shang, Meshloss methods and their applications, Advances in Mechantes, 200, 39(1)- 1-86 (in Chinese)) 20 RA, IY. LMI. SK: SRE ACTAIMEAE, 2004 (hang, Xiong, Lin Yan. Moshloss Methods. Beijing: Tsinghus Uni versity Pross, 2004(in Chinose)) 24 Ma S, Zhang X, Qiu XM. Comparison study of MPM and SPH in modeling hypervelocity impact problems. Interna tional Journat of Impact Engineering, 2009, 20(2) 272-282 25 Bardenhagen 8G, Guilkey JE, Roossig KM, etal, An improved contact algorithm for the material point method and appli- cation to strom propagation n granular material. Computer Modeling sn Enginezring and Setences, 201, 2: 509-522 26 Hu W, Chen ZA multimesh MPM for simulating the mesh- Ing process of spur gears. Computers and Structures, 2003 81(20): 1901-2002 2 Pan XF, Xu AG, Zhang GC, roth material point method for solving collision problems. Communications in Theoretical Physic, 2008, 40(5): 1120- nia 28 Pan XP, Xu AG, Zhang GC, etal. Generalized interpolation material point approach to high melting explosive with cavtin Under shock. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 208, 41();: 015401 29 Xu AG, Pan XP, Zhang GC, et al. Material-point simulation ‘of cavity colapwe under shock. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2007, 19(82): 326212 ‘0 Xu AG, Zhang GC, Pan XF, et al. Morphologicel character. Instion of shocked porous material. Journal af Physics D: Applied Physics, 2009, 42(7): 075409 Si Auricchio F, da. Veiga LB. On « new integration schome for von-Mises plasticity with linear hardening. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 510): 1a75-1a06 a al. Throe-dimenrional malti- (tiemst: 216m)* i 2010 FB 42 148, A NUMERICAL STUDY ON POROUS MATERIALS UNDER SHOCK » Xu Aiguo® Zhang Guangeai Ying Yangjun Zhu Jianshi (National Key Laboratory of Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beging 100088, China) Abstract Shock responses of porous materials are studied using the material-point method. The effects of porosity, mean-cavity-size, shock strength, local divergence and vorticity are investigated. In materials with very small porosity, the shocked portion may arrive at a nearly steady state; the mean pressure and density oscillate slightly due to the tension waves reflected back from the cavities in the downstream portion. In materials with larger porosity, the shock compressibility decreases and the attenuation of shock waves becomes more evident. Under fixed porosity, a higher mean-cavity-size results in a higher mean temperature. The attenuation of shock waves depends on the porosity, mean-cavity-size, and shock strength. Local turbulence mixing and volume dissipation are two important mechanisms for transformation of kinetic energy to heat. The stronger the loaded shock, the stronger the porous effects. The pressure, density, temperature and particle speed do not approach their equilibriums at the same rate. Key words porous material, shock wave response, material-point simulation, local vorticity, local divergence Received 22 July 2009, revised 7 February 2010 1) The project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10702010, 10775018), the Science Foundation of China Academy of Enginocring Physics (20090102005, 200980101012), and the Science Foundation of Laboratory of Compu. ‘ational Physics, 2) E-mail: Xu_Aiguoiapem.ac.cn