Republic of the Philippines

Laguna State Polytechnic University

Province of Laguna

College of Engineering 
GEC 108 - ETHICS

MORALITY
QUESTIONNAIRES

Group 6 Members:
Lorete, Piolo James
Maravilla, Ma. Bernadeth
Marquez, Hannah Lucille
Mendiola, John Cyrus
 Republic of the Philippines
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Province of Laguna

TEST I. True or False

Instructions: Write T if the statement is TRUE, and write F if otherwise.

1. Morals are fixed. It doesn’t change over time.

2. Moral standard does not evaluate standards based on the interests of a

certain person or group, but one that goes beyond personal interests to a
universal standpoint in which each person’s interests are impartially counted
as equal.

3. The same words we use in a moral sense are also often used in a nonmoral
sense.

4. There is a clear connection between manners and morals.

5. Humans and animals can be considered to be moral or immoral, and

therefore only they should be considered morally responsible.

6. Our morality comes from family, friends, religion, society, and emotions.

7. Some hold the theory that values are totally subjective: that morality and
values reside strictly outside of them.

8. According to Freud’s Morality and the Superego, the superego develops

during the first three years of life in response to parental punishment and
approval.

9. The first stage of Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development is the ‘universal-

ethical-principle orientation’.

10. Stage three individuals in Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development are

“people pleasers.”

11. Moral behavior can depend on authority.

12. Morality is something that’s personal and normative, whereas ethics is the
standards of “good and bad” distinguished by a certain community or social
setting.

13. Morality is necessarily based on law.

14. Law can replace or substitute for morality, and therefore we can arbitrarily
equate what is legal with what is moral.

15. Morality need not, indeed should not, be based solely on religion.

TEST II. Identification

Instructions: Identify what is being asked on the following questions. Write your
answer on the space provided.

1. Describes someone who purposely commits an offensive act, even

though they know the difference between what is right and wrong.

2. Describes someone who acknowledges the difference between

right and wrong, but who is not concerned with morality.

3. Can neither be good nor bad nor do anything right or wrong simply
because it does not fall within the scope of morality.

4. This approach is most often used in the social sciences and is

concerned with how human beings do, in fact, behave.

5. One of the categories of philosophical approach that deals with

norms (or standards) and prescriptions.

6. Concerned with human beings in relationship to themselves and to

an individual code of morality that may or may not be sanctioned by
any society or religion.

7. Concerned with human beings in relationship to a supernatural

being or beings.

8. Some people believe that values come from some higher power or
supernatural being, beings, or principle.

9. Careful examination and critical evaluation of all moral issues

whether or not they are based on religion, custom, or tradition

10. Also known as moral realism – morality imposed from the outside.

11. Also known as moral relativism – morality based on your own rules.

12. This level of morality in Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development is

unreflective and consists in maintaining or conforming to the
 expectations of others, family, group, or society.

13. This level of morality in Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development

requires reflective morality and the ability to effectively engage
ethical reasoning apart from, or independently of, group
identification and authority.

14. Stage 6 in Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development where right is

defined by the decision of conscience in accord with self-chosen
ethical principles appealing to logical comprehensiveness,
universality, and consistency.

15. A decision-making problem between two possible moral

imperatives, neither of which is unambiguously acceptable nor
preferable.