Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adobe Scan 08 Sept 2022
Adobe Scan 08 Sept 2022
■ ,
- - - - -
j otfa
, . . unchanged,
goods remain
- • s Ula>me remam constant, and
and prefurences of the consumer remain unchanged.
r., Jeaiia od can be understood with the help of a demand schedule.
~ I o rfulP, is a tabular presentation showing the different quantities of a good that a consumer is
alb I * able to buy at different prices during a period of time.,)
TABLE 2.8: Demand Schedule of Good X
/>rn.c ( ~per unit) Demand (units)
I
50 5
45 10
40 15
Demand schedule given in Table 2.8 illustrates that as price falls from tSO per unit to t40 per unit,
demand
price falls,
for the good rises from 5 units to 15 units. Thus, more quantity of a good are demanded when its
ceteris paribus.
Reasons behind Law of Demand- Derivation of law of demand from the law of
diminishing marginal utility
ng
Why is there an inverse relationship between price of a good and its quantity demanded, other things remaini
the same? Let us understand this using utility analysis.
(a) Using the principle MU = Price
ed
Aa we consume more and more units of a commodity, marginal utility (MU) of each successive unit consum
OD diminishing due to the operation of law of diminishing marginal utility.
Therefore, we will be w1llm c
b ach succcwve unit. Thus, we will buy more units of a commodity only when its price fall
m naJ utilJty and price are equal 1
Now, suppose price of good X (Px) fulls. The situation changes. The consumer is no longer in equilibri
The above equality rums into an inequality: MUx/Px > MUy!Py. It means that per rupee marginal u ..
consumption ofX is greater than from consumption ofY. This induces the consumer to buy more ofX
ofY. The consumer rransfers expenditure from Y to X. The consumer now demands more ofX.
This shows that when price of a good falls, the consumer demands more of that good.
cc
t ,9,, n: I, J
~at~•'"'E"''".,
Table 2.10 illustrates that if the price rises from flO per unit to
o.________.___..._____,.
30 SO 70 X
Quantity Demanded
f 11 per unit, its quantity demanded falls from 50 units to 30 units. Figure 2.15
70
llllillnlng constant at ,10 per unit, due to any other 6
more quantity of it at the same price from 50 units to 70
Deman d ( unit\)
30
• price of the good remaining constant at fl0 per unit, due to any other
Ill tute and preference for it, a consumer buys less quantity of it at the same Price,
ti!!!!!! - 3G units.
I
P
I
I'
p
D
0
Q Ql
X 0
Demand for DOOd X (1 normal 900d) Q2 Q X
Demand for good X (a normal good)
Figure 2.17
Iofenor good is any good whose de d fall '
income deaeases, the demand for it man
rises. s as the consumer's income increases, and as the consumers
Thus, a consumer's demand for an in£ · d • . . . · f h
Examples of inferior goods include lo enor goo moves
a1· c d · m the
1· opposite d1rect1on
• of the mcome o t e consumer.
0 . . w qu ity roo items 1ke toned milk, coarse cereals, etc.
Effett / mer.ase m consumer~ income on demand for an inferior good: Suppose with rise in income a
consumer buys less of Y. then good Y is inferior for that consumer. As the consumer's income rises, his ability to
buy normal goods increases. So he prefers to buy less quantity of the inferior good. Therefore, the price-demand
curve of the inferior good shifts to the left at the same price.
Figure 2.18 shows that as income increases, the demand for an inferior good Y decreases from OQ to OQi at
the same price OP. It leads to a leftward shift in the demand curve of inferior good Y from DD to D D .
1 1
Effect of decrease in consumer's income on demand for an inferior good: Suppose with fall in income a
consumer buys more of Y, then good Y is inferior for that consumer. As the consumer's income decreases, his
bility to buy normal goods decreases. So he buys more quantity of the inferior good. Therefore, the price-
emand curve of the inferior good shifts to the right at the same price.
igure 2.19 shows that as income decreases, the demand for an inferior good Y increases from OQ to OQi at
he same price OP. It leads to a rightward shift in the demand curve of inferior good Y from DD to D2D2.
y y
Leftward shift in price-demand Rightward shift in price-demand
curve of inferior good Y due to )
curve of inferior good Y due to
D increase in income. decrease in income.
► >
"C "C
0 0
0 0
DI DI
~
0 p 'o p
a, a,
IJ IJ
'C: 'i:
0. 0.
0 Q 0 Q Q2 X
QI X
Demand for good Y (an inferior good) Demand for good Y (an Inferior good)
1
Figure 2.19
2. Change in prices of rel,ttcll goods
Related goods a~ eithc1 suh~titnte~ ot Lomplcmcnts.
Sub.st tut , , arc those goods which can he use,! i11 place of 011c another, for satisfaction of a
want, e.g., (i) Pepsi and Coca-Cola (ii) Tea and Coffee.
There is a diro.t relation bemccn d1.1ngc in prin· of a substitute good and change in demand for the . 1
p,.
Fffect of i,,nw,s, ;,, pritt of a substitute good: An increase in price of a substitute good makes the gi:en ~
rdatn-dv cheaper. A.s a result, demand for the given good increases at the same price, and hence demand l\lvcii
riglu."~· for ~ample, Pepsi .m~ C~-Cola are close substitutes '.or each o~er. Sup~ose the given good ~;rvc
prier ot its subsntute good Coe-a-Cola nses. So the consumer can shift to Pepsi because it has become rdativel ~~
Therefure, it leads to increase in demand for Pepsi at the same price. Demand curve of Pepsi shifts to the ~ nJ
Figure 2.20 shm\s thar as price of Coco-Cola rises, the demand for Pepsi increases from OQ to OQ.i a t
price OP. It leads to a rightward shift in the demand curve of Pepsi from DD to D 1D 1• t the
Fffict ofdecrease in price of a substitute good: A decrease in price of a substitute good makes the .
relath·dy costlier. ,I\:; a result, demand for the given good decreases at the same price, and hence d given
~
sh1·&s letrwards. For example, Pepsi and Coca-Cola are substitutes for each other. Suppose the given g00d.
ernand
.and pnce· ot· its substitute good Coca-Cola falls. So the consumer will substitute Coco-Cola for Pepsi. 1'hu
it_ leads to decrease in demand for Pepsi at the same price. Demand curve of Pepsi shifts to the left. et
Fi~re 2.21 shows that as price of Coco-Cola falls, the demand for Pepsi decreases from OQ to OQi at th
pnce OP. It leads co a leftward shift in the demand curve of Pepsi from DD to D 2D 2. e
y
y Leftward shift in
Rightward shift in
demand curve of Pepsi
D. demand curve of Pepsi
due to decrease in price
due to increase in price D of Coco-Cola, a
of Coco-Cola, a
'iii substitute good.
'iii substitute good.
Q. Q.
a, C1J
~ A.
....0 "'0"' p
p
a, C1J
u u
'i: 'i':
~ A.
D1
D
0 0 Q2 Q X
Q Qt X
Demand for Pepsi Demand for Pepsi
0 Q2 Q X
~ .....- - -..x
o- - - - -Q Demand
Demand
Markt De d
Marht ckmao<I is the sum of quantity demanded which all the consumers are willing to buy at a
•
pnunwket
The a periodfurofatime.
daringdemand good at each price can be derived by adding up the demands of all the consUtn
char price. Suppose there are only rwo consumers in the market for a good. Suppose at price ~ per un·
demand by consumer A is JO units and that by consumer B is I 5 units. Then, the market demand for th:
at price f3 per unit is 10 + 15 = 25 units. Similarly, at price ~4 per unit, if the demand by consume
8 units and thar by consumer B is I 2 units, the market demand of the good at ~4 is 8 + I 2 = 20 units.
TABLE 2.13: Market Demand Schedule
Market Demand
Individual Demands
Priu: (A+ B)
25 (= 10 + 15)
12 20 (= 8 + 12)
Marker demand curve is derived by the horizontal summation of individual demand curves in the market
yt>. y
y D
d d
B4 ······~ B4 ············~
·c ·c
A. 3 A. 3
dA
~d
01 ,... 25
0 12 15 0 20
8 10 X X
Demand by B Market demand
Demand by A
w••• dme an two mDIWllas A and B and the demand cuna of the two CODIIUllal
lll!INll•t•/• tla 10. dle awoaw A clcmands Oanit of the good, wl .....,_ •
••••---n I • ••• 9 aait of the good.
;;a
is
--•iaihanl5.
(NCERT) II• II
it yourself 9
~
Mi&H~•a,,_;~,;. c;:;,;;a~
_ _ _ _ Ongmal = 50 ~ .
Ongmal = 28
New = 23 New = 100
eo change in quantity demanded (~q) x original price (p) = 50 x 28 = _ _
56
change in price (~p) original quantity (q) -5 50
(minus sign is ignored as it only represents the inverse relation between price and quantity demanded.)
e0 = 5.6 (e0 > I, Elastic demand)
Top Tip
The measure of price elasticity of demand has a minus sign because there is inverse relation between price and quantity
demanded of a good, other factors remaining the same. However, for simplicity, we will ignore the minus sign.
------------ - ---- --
••rychnanded of Apples.
All •rzrnd for a good is equal to the percentage change in price then
., __,, elastic. '
ill in price of a good, its demand 5Y
·c
A.
D
--10%
..,. uawamoded
20 p
100= x = IO%
200
l!l!"'l•••in quantity demanded
P1
c:haogc in price D
0 q q
ts the inverse ·
relanon
Figure 2.29 Unitary Elastic Det'Mf'IO Cur,·
" ' • .-1}.
0 q X
Ap = 9 - 10 =-1; Quantity Demanded
and change in quantity
Aq p O 10
e0 =-x- =-x-=O
Ap q 1 18
Demand (kg)
II
0 X
I ylll pricc, Ap=9- 9 = 0
1111111111_,. 1 • 100 and change in quantity
Figure 2.31 Perfectly El.1c;t1c Dt•m.11',
Curve (e ~
• • I I I . Ill
i,.naad for Luxuries d
• ili of dose substitutes of the. goo
ty . f variety of pulses nses, consumers
--■IQH; if the price . pri
b • ot aSo demand for sueh a goo d 1s
~P -
which is a dose su sntu e. '
,al,mwtts are not available, e.g. salt, water etc., the demand is price-inelasti
\~ .. ~ ~ ~ "ft,.
,..d,rf
D q,,aatitywill
6,u guoilbels clm,anded wh Th
animy elastic. •~"?demanded
. of this good at a price of '{10 is 80 units, How
s.,h,lioD' en the pnce rues by 20'll,! Calculate. (} m,rlu)
Demand (units)
Prkc (<)
80
10 + 20% = 12
Do it yourself 14
Market demand for a good a1 ~ per unit is I 000 umis. The price rises. As a result, ,he m1rkt1 dem nd
25%. Find 1he ne\, price if demand is unirar)' das1k. [Ans, f1! (} .....
......
erado Jpn
ded -IO
-----=-=-2
5
• • .••••
Demand ( unit<.;)
120
l>etMm price and quantity demanded.)
W- pdcie of good decreases to one-fourth of the original price, its demand increases three times more. What is
i1I pria elasticity of demand? Calculate. , (.l marks)
Solution: Let original price be "p' per unit. Therefore, new price= .£.
4
Let original demand be 'q' units. Therefore, new demand = q + 3q = 4q
p -3p
--p -
4 4
Percentage change in price = - - x 100 =- - x 100 =-75
p p
. 4q-q 3q
Percentage change m demand = - - x 100 =- x 100 =300
q q
percentage change in demand 300 =_
4
Price elasticity of demand, eo percentage change in price - 75
Do it yourself 18
Aeomumer buys 8 kg of potatoes at a price of fl per kg. Price elasticity of demand is (-) 1. How much quantity
wll be demanded if the price rises to f8 per kg? [Ans. 6.85 kg appx.] (3 marks)
new demand is 50 + 10 = 60 units
r
its price falls by f 1 per unit, its quantity demanded t
~ - was 30 units, what was the price at this demand? (3
~
a, 25'6 .,_ daae i, no effect on demand of the good due to this price rise. Cal
Suppo,e demand for the good remains unchanged at 'q' units .
~I
.Pe«enrage change in demand = q - q x I00 = ~ x I00 = 0
q q
odr self 20
10 lOO 100 0%
J>erc)en 10
IIF change in quandty demanded ( ) 40%
Pric:c elasoaty of demand (co) 40% 2
. . . . 20%
CO -
(manus CO> 1sI,ignored
sign as it on1Yrepresents the inverse
Elastic demand) · re1auon
. between price and quantity demanded.)
2(
lilillr -~--1..•
1,c a clcmaod .,__......
D(p) -- 10 .- 3p· w w.t IS th• elasttaty
Ca ·tD
. fr 4:lae - - cane
r..-...JalGm,-. "nnL-. • · · of demand at price 5/31 Is the claoand cune
(NCEim (4mark•l
5 5
At p == - , q == 10 - 3 x - == 10 - 5 == 5
3 3
Substituting these values, we get e0 = - 3 x (5/3)/5 = - I
No, the demand curve is not likely to be a ,ectangular hyperbola but a straight line downward sloping
demand curve since the demand curve equation is a linear demand curve equation.
(3 marks)
Do it yourself 22 curve D(p) = JO - 5p- What is the elasticity of demand at price 3/51
the dcJnand