CRITERIA BEHAVIORS

Quality of Intellectual ● Did the group member make strong evidence-based arguments?
Contribution (QIC) ● Did they offer insight into the problems posed?
● Did they contribute meaningfully to the final product?
● Did they help prepare all work in a quality manner?
Quantity of Contributions ● Did the group member contribute significantly to the success of the project?
(QC) ● Did they contribute meaningfully to group discussions?
Participation (P) ● Was the group member respectful of group dynamics?
● Did they contribute and build on the ideas of others?
● Did they listen as much as they contributed?
● Did they draw in others and attempt to resolve conflict?
● Did they demonstrate a cooperative and supportive attitude?
Reliability, Responsibility ● Did the group member attend group meetings regularly and arrive on time?
and Communication (RRC) ● Did they prepare for team meetings by completing prereading or agreed
upon tasks?
● Did they complete follow-up tasks by the agreed-upon deadlines?
● Did they make an effort to respond to group communication in a timely
fashion?

Rate your self and your groupmates using the 5-point rating scale below.

Evaluator: Arnobit, Ivan Louis C.

Business Name: Omorfia

Rating Scale
1 – Behaviors were demonstrated on rare occasions
2 – Behaviors were demonstrated less than half of the time
3 – Behaviors were demonstrated half of the time
4 – Behaviors were demonstrated more than half the time
5 – Behaviors were demonstrated with regular consistency

List ALL the names of the members in the group including yourself. Members should be sorted in
alphabetical order according to family name.

Name of Group Members Criteria

TOTAL
Family Name Given Name QIC QC P RRC
Albero Richelle Mae 5 5 5 5 20
Alcantara Mark William 5 5 5 5 20
Aquino Jose Emanuel 5 5 5 5 20
Arnobit Ivan Louis 5 5 5 5 20
Batilo Angeline Kate 5 5 5 5 20
Baniqued Diana Rose 5 5 5 5 20
Bayeng Nicole Kathrine 5 5 5 5 20
Gonzales Mark Ethan 5 5 5 5 20