Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cytowic, R. (2013) - Using The 10% of Your Brain
Cytowic, R. (2013) - Using The 10% of Your Brain
Brain?
Why multitasking is a losing proposition, and our brain
energy is limited.
Posted Nov 28, 2013
An
earlier
post
debunked
the
myth
that
we
use
only
10%
of
our
brain.
According
to
this
tale,
90%
of
our
brain
stands
idly
by,
waiting
to
be
recruited
for
spare
capacity.
The
fantastic
logic
behind
this
idea
should
be
apparent:
the
reverse
argument
implies
that
we
are
poised
to
tap
into
extraordinary
latent
abilities.
Neither
of
these
premises
is
remotely
true.
Yet
hucksters
boasting
methods
“based
on
neuroscience”
promise
to
unleash
hidden
potential.
What
they
actually
unlock
is
your
wallet.
Nonetheless,
two–thirds
of
the
public
and
nearly
half
of
science
teachers
believe
the
10%
myth,
which
shows
how
hard
it
is
for
facts
to
crowd
out
mistaken
attitudes.
More
than
75%
of
science
teachers
believe
that
enriching
a
child’s
environment—with
Baby
Einstein
videos,
for
instance—strengthens
the
brain.
It
is
true
that
growing
up
locked
in
closet
or
otherwise
deprived
of
human
contact
demonstrably
impairs
a
growing
brain;
it
does
not
follow
that
enriching
a
child’s
environment
beyond
what
is
typical
will
boost
cognitive
development.
The
idea
that
we
don’t
utilize
all
of
our
brain
capacity
emerged
perhaps
in
the
19th
Century
when
neurology
first
burgeoned
as
a
science.
In
the
1890s
William
James,
the
father
American
psychology,
said,
“Most
of
us
do
not
meet
our
mental
potential.”
James
meant
this
as
a
challenge
rather
than
an
indictment
of
insufficient
brain
usage.
Nonetheless,
the
charge
stuck.
For
a
long
time
also,
scientists
could
assign
no
function
to
the
great
expanse
of
the
frontal
lobes
or
the
equally
large
association
areas
of
parietal
cortex.
Circular
reasoning
concluded
that
because
damage
to
these
areas
didn’t
cause
motor
or
sensory
deficits,
they
therefore
didn’t
“do
anything.”
For
decades
these
brain
parts
were
known
as
“silent
areas”
because
their
function
remained
unknown.
Today
we
appreciate
that
they
underscore
executive
and
integrative
functions
without
which
we
would
hardly
be
human.
These
cortical
expanses
are
crucial
to
reasoning,
planning,
deciding,
and
adapting
to
circumstances.
They
lie
behind
our
most
abstract
reasoning.
We
usually
talk
about
the
brain
in
terms
of
computing
power,
but
look
what
happens
when
we
regard
it
in
terms
of
energy
cost.
Rodent
and
canine
brains
consume
5%
of
total
body
energy.
Monkey
brains
use
10%.
An
adult
human
brain
accounts
for
only
2%
of
the
body’s
mass,
yet
consumes
44%
of
daily
glucose
burned,
far
more
than
expected
for
its
relative
size.
Brain
size
scales
with
body
size.
Human
brains
weigh
1.5
Kg,
elephant
brains
5
Kg,
and
whale
brains
9
Kg.
Yet
on
a
per
weight
basis,
human
brains
are
packed
with
more
neurons
than
other
species.
This
dense
packing
is
what
makes
us
so
smart.
There
is
a
tradeoff
between
body
size
and
the
number
of
neurons
that
a
primate,
including
us,
can
sustain.
A
25
Kg
ape
has
to
eat
8
hours
a
day
to
sustain
a
brain
of
53
billion
neurons.
The
invention
of
cooking
one–and–a
half–million
years
ago
gave
humans
a
huge
advantage.
Cooked
food
is
rendered
soft
and
predigested
outside
of
the
body.
Our
guts
more
easily
absorb
its
energy.
Cooking
frees
up
time
and
gives
us
more
energy
than
if
we
ate
raw
foodstuffs.
As
a
result
we
sustain
a
brain
of
86
billion
densely
packed
neurons.
It
still
turns
out
that
neuronal
activity
is
costly
in
terms
of
energy
use.
Most
of
the
daily
calories
that
the
brain
burns
go
toward
housekeeping:
pumping
sodium
and
potassium
ions
across
membranes
to
maintain
an
electrical
charge
and
keep
the
structure
intact.
The
brain
is
an
energy
hog.
It
consumes
an
astounding
3.4
x
1021
ATP
molecules
per
minute
(ATP
is
the
coal
of
the
body’s
furnace).
The
mere
cost
of
maintaining
resting
potentials
in
all
of
our
neurons
means
that
little
energy
is
left
for
neuronal
spikes—the
nerve
discharges
that
actually
get
things
done.
Even
given
a
few
percent
of
firing
neurons
in
a
local
region,
the
energy
burden
of
generating
spikes
over
the
entire
cortex
is
unsustainable.
Far
less
than
10%
is
the
energy
limit
we
must
live
with.
It
is
for
this
reason
that
selective
attention
exists—our
focus
on
one
thing
at
a
time.
It
is
why
multitasking
is
a
fool’s
errand:
We
simply
lack
the
energy
to
do
two
things
at
once,
let
alone
thre
or
five.
When
we
try
to
multitask
we
do
each
task
less
well
than
if
we’d
given
it
our
full
attention.
Any
practical
solution
to
the
energy
limit
demands
that
we
give
ourselves
more
brainpower.
But
how?
Fans
of
Dr.
Who
might
turn
to
the
Ood,
aliens
who
hold
a
glowing
orb
of
a
supplemental
brain
in
their
hand.
This
might
sound
silly,
but
real
life
has
caught
up
with
science
fiction.
Every
day
you
see
hundreds
of
people
wielding
supplementary
Richard
E.
Cytowic,
MD,
MFA,
professor
of
neurology
at
George
Washington
University,
is
known
for
returning
synesthesia
to
mainstream
science.
Wednesday
Is
Indigo
Blue,
with
David
Eagleman,
won
the
Montaigne
Medal.