Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study-Fibroids in Pregnancy
Case Study-Fibroids in Pregnancy
Case Study-Fibroids in Pregnancy
INTRODUCTION
Fibroids according to (Sanders R.C. and Winter T.C, 2007); are classified based on
their location in relation to the endometrial cavity as:
Submucosal - fibroids, which border on the endometrial cavity, often cause
frequent lengthy periods with intramenstrual spotting and may cause in fertility.
Intracavitary- Fibroids that lie within the cavity or protrude into the cavity which
are even more likely to cause vaginal bleeding and cramping.
Pedunculated- Fibroids that have a small neck and extend to the border of the
uterus. They may be hard to distinguish from adnexal masses and may twist and
infarct (torsion).
A 49 year old patient in this case presented the Gynaecology OPD with a painful mass
in lower abdomen with gradual enlargement of abdomen for last 7 months. She had a
clinical history of nausea, vomiting, weight loss, loss of appetite, pain in the lower
abdomen, intermenstrual bleeding and intermittent constipation.
INDICATION
Abnormal uterine bleeding ???. Rule out uterine fibroids/pelvic pathology.
Examination Date: 26 July 2022
PATIENT INFORMATION
Date of Birth 27 August 1973
Parity 3
Gravida 5
Last Menstrual Period Unknown
Contraceptive Nil
Marital Status Married
Sex Female
Level of Education Ordinary Level
EQUIPMENT
Mindray DC-6 Ultrasound machine.
3.5-5MHz curvilinear probe .
Sony High glossy thermal paper.
Ultrasound gel.
Sony Ultrasound Printer.
PATIENT PREPARATION, PATIENT CARE AND PROTOCOL
Standard gynaecological transabdominal scan protocol documented in appendix B
attached
OBSERVATIONS AND FINDINGS
There was a bulky anteverted and non-gravid uterus with a heterogeneous echotexture
measuring 11.14 cm x 6.42 cm x 9.93 cm. The uterus had an irregular shape with well
defined margins and a short normal cervix.
A symmetrical, well-defined, heterogeneous, solitary solid mass measuring 7.76
cm x 6.55 cm x 7.99 cm was seen occupying the myometrial layer of the uterus.
The intramural heterogeneous mass appeared as if it enclosed two echogenic
distinct masses with hypoechoic margins pushing the urinary bladder anteriorly.
The intramural mass does not cover the cervix though it occupies the anterior and
posterior aspects of the myometrium.
The endometrium was not visualised
Color Doppler ultrasound showed the fibroid’s circumferential vascularity.
Pulsed wave Doppler was not used to assess the waveform of the feeding vessels.
The ovaries were not visualised and there were no adnexal solid or cystic masses
seen.
The urinary bladder was distended with a relatively smooth mucosal outline and
its contents were not visualised hence its integrity was not assessed.
There was no free fluid in the pouch of Douglas.
There was a complex cystic abdominal mass seen antero-lateral to the uterus
with an echogenic irregular central intact solid mass. It measured 9,89 cm x 4,38
cm. Its length extends from the midline to the midclavicular line on the right
lower quadrant.
There was evidence of peripheral vascularity on color Doppler interrogation.
Uterine Measurements
Serial Parameter Measurement (cm)
(a) (b) (c)
1. Uterine length 11.4
2. Uterine width 9.93
3. Uterine height 6.42
4. Uterine volume 371.2 cc
5. Uterine body 27.49
Comment
1. Bulky non gravid fibroid uterus.
2. An intramural symmetrical, well-defined, heterogeneous, solitary solid mass
measuring 7.76 cm x 6.55 cm x 7.99 cm occupies the entire myometrium.
3. Complex cystic pelvi-abdominal mass measuring 9,89 cm x 4,38 cm.
4. Ultrasound guided biopsy is recommended.
5. Differential diagnosis could be:
Uterine lipoleiomyoma.
Focal adenomyosis.
Uterine leiomyosarcoma; though rare.
Correlate clinically.
Signed………………………………….S. TANGWADZANA
(Diagnostic Radiographer/Student Sonographer)
DISCUSSION
It has been generally accepted that myomas are more prevalent in blacks than in
Caucasian and Hispanic populations (Kjerulff, K. H. et al 1996). Although the cause
of the higher prevalence among black women is unclear, differences in circulating
oestrogen levels have been found. It is still unclear (Parker, W. H. 2007) whether
these ethnical differences are genetic or due to known variations in hormonal
metabolism, diet, or environmental factors.
Leppert et al. reported that the pathogenesis of fibroids seems to involve a positive
feedback loop between extracellular matrix production and cell proliferation, and
vitamin D might act to block the positive feedback. It is also interesting that myomas
and keloids, both more common in black women, have similar gene characteristics.
Furthermore, it is well known that family history could represent a strong
predisposing factor; the first-degree relatives of affected women have a 2.5 times
increased risk of developing fibroids. However, as recently reported from Saldana et
al., such bias would invalidate self-reported family history as a predictor of fibroid
risk (Saldana. T.M. 2013).
Patient Presentation
Abnormal uterine bleeding and intermenstrual bleeds are common symptoms of
uterine fibroids. Other symptoms however, include anaemia, back pain, pelvic pain
and pressure, constipation, urinary frequency/retention, miscarriages, or infertility.
These characteristic symptoms resembles those of 49 years old patient in this case
who presented to the Gynaecology OPD with a painful mass in lower abdomen with
gradual enlargement of abdomen for last 7 months. She had a clinical history of
nausea, vomiting, weight loss, loss of appetite, pain in the lower abdomen,
intermenstrual bleeding and intermittent constipation.
MANAGEMENT
Because of the high likelihood of uterine problems such as necrosis and malignant
transformation of benign fibroid tumours, treatment of uterine fibroids should be
tailored to the size and location of the tumour, patient’s age, presenting symptoms,
desire to maintain fertility and the gynaecologicals experience. Uterine artery
embolization, ablative treatments, expectant care, surgery, and medicinal management
are all options for treating this fibroid. Conservative, medicinal, or surgical treatment
options are available.
Patients who are asymptomatic are treated conservatively. This includes periodic
explanations, reassurances, and re-examinations. If anaemia is discovered in
symptomatic cases of menorrhagia, it should be treated. Menorrhagia can be treated
with tranexamic acid, combined oral contraceptives, or a levonogestrel-releasing
intrauterine device. Prescription of agonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue, which
has been used to limit oestrogen production and, as a result, reduces the mass of
existing fibroids, making them suitable for laparoscopic surgery.
CONCLUSION
Because of the risk of excessive haemorrhaging, obstetricians usually avoid the
removal of uterine fibroids during cesarean deliveries unless they are tiny and
pedunculated. Despite the fact that the majority of fibroids are asymptomatic, their
location and size may have an impact on the pregnancy and delivery process.
Performing routine myomectomies during cesarean section is not indicated, but it is a
feasible and safe technique in some cases, with a good prognosis for the patient.
Consequently, the decision of performing myomectomies during pregnancy can be a
challenge and must be performed for selected cases. This procedure may have several
benefits, such as avoiding another operation to remove fibroids. Therefore ultrasound
plays an important role in obstetrics and gynaecology for the diagnosis and evaluation
of fibroids, their location as well as their number for monitoring their growth and
planning of mode of management appropriately.
REFERENCES: