Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manufacturer Storage With Direct Shipping and in Transit Merger
Manufacturer Storage With Direct Shipping and in Transit Merger
SUBMITTED BY:
SESSION:
BBA VII (2019-2023)
SUBMITTED TO:
Ma’am ASVIR
ASSIGNMENT
Inventory –as with drop-shipping, the ability to aggregate inventories and postpone
product customization is a significant advantage of in-transit merge.
Transportation –although an increase in coordination is required, merge in transit
decreases transportation costs relative to drop-shipping by aggregating the final
delivery.
Facility and handling –facility and processing costs for the manufacturer and
retailer are like those for drop-shipping. The party performing the in-transit merge
has higher facility costs because of the merge capability required.
Information –The investment in information infrastructure is higher than for drop-
shipping. In addition to information, operations at the retailer, manufacturers, and
the carrier must be coordinated.
Response time, product variety, availability, time to market– like drop-shipping.
Response times may be marginally higher because of the need to perform a merge.
Customer experience –better than with drop-shipping because the customer
receives only on delivery for an order instead of many partial shipments.
Order visibility –important requirement. Initial setup is difficult, however, tracking
itself becomes easier because of the merge that occurs.
Return ability–similar to that with drop-shipping
Manufacturer storage with in-transit merge is best suited for low- to medium-
demand, high-value items the retailer is sourcing from a limited number of
manufacturers.
Merge-in transit has several disadvantages over the traditional way, which
includes the followings:
1. Additional Effort During the Merge
2.Difficult to Coordinate and Implement
EXAMPLE: Furniture retailers merge couches and coffee tables produced by
different manufacturers.