Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Essence of Conservation ICOM
Essence of Conservation ICOM
Whati
stheessenc
eof
c
onser
vati
on?
)UDQoRLV 0DLUHVVH DQG 5HQDWD ) 3HWHUV
ICOM’s general conference in Kyoto in 2019 o ers the opportunity for the
, 20 RPPLWWHH IRU RQVHUYDWLRQ , 20 DQG WKH ,QWHUQDWLRQDO RPPLWWHH
for Museology (ICOFOM) to jointly re ect on common scienti c interests and
LVVXHV DW WKH KHDUW RI RXU SURIHVVLRQDO 7KLV GLDORJXH LV HVVHQWLDO IRU , 20 DV
WKH FRPPLWWHH DLPV WR SURPRWH WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ RI FXOWXUDO DQG KLVWRULFDO ZRUNV
DQG WR DGYDQFH WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ GLVFLSOLQH %XW LW LV DOVR FHQWUDO IRU , 2)20
ZKRVH DFWLYLWLHV HPEUDFH PXVHXP WKHRU DQG FULWLFDO WKLQNLQJ 7KH FRPPRQ
interests in critical re ection upon the museum motivated the two committees
WR PHHW WR GLVFXVV WKH HVVHQFH DQG DLPV RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ
Conser
vati
onandthemuseum
7KH LQYHQWLRQ RI WKH PRGHUQ PXVHXP LQ WKH :HVWHUQ (QOLJKWHQPHQW ZDV ODUJHO
EDVHG RQ WKH FRQVWLWXWLRQ RI FROOHFWLRQV RI PDWHULDO WKLQJV ZKLFK QHHGHG WR EH
SUHVHUYHG VR WKDW WKH FRXOG FRQWLQXH WR EH DYDLODEOH IRU IXWXUH JHQHUDWLRQV 7KH
UHVXOWLQJ PXVHXP PRGHO ZLWK D IRFXV RQ SUHVHUYDWLRQ UHVHDUFK DQG FRPPXQLFD
WLRQ WKURXJK H[KLELWLRQV SXEOLFDWLRQV DQG RU PHGLDWLRQ LV VWLOO SUHYDOHQW WRGD
Centr
alquesti
ons
6XFK LVVXHV DUH DW WKH KHDUW RI WKH PXVHRORJLFDO SURFHVV DV ZHOO DV DQ DFWLYLW
related to conservation. They signi cantly impact the way we look at heritage
FRQVHUYDWLRQ DQG FRQQHFW ZLWK D NH FRQFHSW LQ WKH PXVHXP DXWKHQWLFLW 0XFK
RI WKH SRZHU RI WKH WDQJLEOH WKLQJV SUHVHQWHG LQ PXVHXPV LV UHODWHG WR WKHLU DX
WKHQWLFLW HYHQ WKRXJK PXVHXPV KDYH D ORQJ KLVWRU RI H[KLELWLQJ VXUURJDWHV H J
SODVWHU FDVWV PRGHOV UHSOLFDV GLJLWDO UHFRQVWUXFWLRQV HWF 7KH UHODWLRQVKLSV
ZH KROG ZLWK UHDOLW WKURXJK PXVHXPV DUH HVVHQWLDOO OLQNHG WR WKH PDWHULDO
DXWKHQWLFLW RI REMHFWV WKDW ZHUH WDNHQ IURP WKHLU RULJLQDO FRQWH[W DQG UH FRQWH[
WXDOLVHG LQWR WKH PXVHXP VSDFH 0RVW RI XV GR QRW ORRN DW WKH 0RQD /LVD WKH
VDPH ZD ZH ORRN DW D UHSURGXFWLRQ RU D FRS RI WKDW SDLQWLQJ 1RU GR ZH JLYH
WKHP WKH VDPH NLQG RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ FDUH 7KLV LV ODUJHO EHFDXVH RI WKH ZD ZH
SHUFHLYH DXWKHQWLFLW ZKLFK PD DOVR VXJJHVW WKDW PXVHXPV DUH LQVWLWXWLRQV
WUXVWHG E WKH SXEOLF DQ HVSHFLDOO LQWHUHVWLQJ IHDWXUH LQ WKH DJH RI IDNH QHZV
7KH JOREDO VHWWLQJ RI WKH , 20 . RWR RQIHUHQFH DQG WKH FORVH FRQWH[W RI WKH
1DUD RFXPHQW RQ XWKHQWLFLW DQG 1DUD LQVSLUHG XV WR UHYLVLW WKH
VXEWOHWLHV LQYROYHG LQ WKH IXQGDPHQWDO SULQFLSOHV RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ DQG H[DPLQH
TXHVWLRQV DURXQG WKH HVVHQFH RI WKH GLVFLSOLQH 8QGHU WKLV OLJKW WKH IROORZLQJ
SDSHUV H[SORUH RQH RU PRUH RI WKH IRXU DQDO WLFDO VWUDQGV EHORZ
V YDW D GD W WFW
What is conservation today, and how does it relate to di erent notions
of authenticity? How do di erent perceptions of authenticity a ect the
FRQVHUYDWLRQ GHFLVLRQ PDNLQJ DQG KRZ GRHV WKDW LPSDFW WKH PDWHULDO
IDEULF RI WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ REMHFW R ZH SULRULWLVH WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ RI
DQ REMHFW EHFDXVH LW LV SHUFHLYHG DV DXWKHQWLF RQYHUVHO FDQ FRQVHU
YDWLRQ HQKDQFH DQ REMHFW V DXWKHQWLFLW :KDW DUH WKH DOWHUQDWLYHV DQG
implications of di erent approaches?
D G DWW
:KDW FULWHULD DUH XVHG WKURXJKRXW WKH ZRUOG WR GHWHUPLQH WKH DXWKHQWLFLW
of an object and what are the underlying justi cations and implications?
,V WKHUH D SUHIHUHQFH IRU PDWWHU RYHU IRUP RU YLFH YHUVD :KDW DUH WKH
possible compromises in these relationships? How do these notions a ect
DQG RU LQIRUP WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ SURFHVV :KDW DUH RWKHU FHQWUDO IDFWRUV
that inform/in uence the conservation process? And nally, what are the
UHODWLRQVKLSV EHWZHHQ DXWKHQWLFLW UHSOLFDV LPLWDWLRQV DQG UHLQYHQWLRQV
V YDW S DFW F V
UH WKHUH UHJLRQDO RU FRQWLQHQWDO FRQVHUYDWLRQ SUDFWLFHV DURXQG WKH
ZRUOG R SHUFHSWLRQV RI DXWKHQWLFLW YDU DFFRUGLQJ WR UHJLRQDO ORFD
tions or points in history? Can di erent perceptions coexist in the same
context? What are other important factors in uencing these perceptions
DQG KRZ FDQ WKH EH FDWHJRULVHG
V YDW G FV DN
How do contexts and/or interest groups a ect the conservation deci
VLRQ PDNLQJ DQG ZKDW DUH WKH LPSDFWV RQ DXWKHQWLFLW DQG PDWHULDO IDEULF
:KDW DUH WKH FXOWXUDO UHDVRQV EHKLQG WKHVH FKRLFHV 6RPH PHWKRGV IRU
H[DPSOH PD IDYRXU D PRUH YLVXDO SUHVHQFH RI WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ DFWLRQ
7KLV LV LOOXVWUDWHG IRU H[DPSOH E .LQWVXJL WKH -DSDQHVH DUW RI UHSDL
ULQJ SRWWHU ZLWK D PL[WXUH RI ODFTXHU DQG JROG 2WKHU DSSURDFKHV PD
DOORZ GHWHULRUDWLRQ PHFKDQLVPV WR FRPSOHWH WKHLU F FOHV XQWLO DOO PDWHULDO
IDEULF KDV SHULVKHG :KDW DUH WKH FXOWXUDO UHDVRQV IRU WKH GHYHORSPHQW
of di erent methods and approaches? And nally, how can conservation
a ect issues relating to ‘cultural appropriation’?
7KH IROORZLQJ SDSHUV DUH SUHVHQWHG LQ DOSKDEHWLFDO RUGHU EXW VRPH FRPPRQ WKH
PHV HPHUJH VXFK DV PHPRU KLVWRU SKLORVRSK GHFRORQL]DWLRQ YDOXHV DVVLJQHG
to collections by di erent interest groups, knowledge systems and knowledge
transmission, among others. The collection starts with Au ret, who uses her
RZQ WUDMHFWRU DV D FRQVHUYDWRU DV D EDFNGURS WR LQYHVWLJDWH WKH UHODWLRQVKLSV
EHWZHHQ FRQVHUYDWLRQ DQG DXWKHQWLFLW WLPH DQG FRQWH[W +HU HPSKDVLV LV RQ WKH
human dimension of conservation decision-making, and how di erent O U
[S U UP U O U U U [SO U U
SU 7XRO 6OHQJ HQRFLGH 0XVHXP LQ DPERGLD 7KH GLVFXVVLRQ
VKRZV WKDW WKH DSSURDFKHV XVHG LQ WKH SURMHFW SURYLGH D FOHDU XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI
the signi cance of the collection for Cambodian cultural identity, as de ned by
VXUYLYRUV DQG IRXQGHUV RI WKH PXVHXP %UXORQ 6RDUHV DQG *XHGHV RXWOLQH D SDWK
IRU WKH GHFRORQLVDWLRQ RI PXVHXP SUDFWLFHV FDVH VWXG IURP WKH 0XVHXP RI WKH
,QGLDQ LQ 5LR GH -DQHLUR %UD]LO VKRZV KRZ DXWKHQWLFLW LQ PXVHXPV VKRXOG EH
FRQQHFWHG WR ORFDO NQRZOHGJH WKHUHE TXHVWLRQLQJ WKH SULPDF RI PDWHULDOLW LQ
WKH RULJLQDO´ REMHFW DVWULRWD GUDZV XSRQ FRQFHSWV IURP VHPLRWLFV DHVWKHWLFV
DQG SRVW VWUXFWXUDOLVW FULWLFLVP WR H[SDQG DQG FODULI WKH FRQFHSW RI DXWKHQWL
FLW WDNLQJ LQWR FRQVLGHUDWLRQ ERWK FXOWXUDO UHODWLYLVP DQG LQWHUVXEMHFWLYLW LQ
WKH FRQVWUXFWLRQ DQG SHUIRUPDQFH RI DQ REMHFW V LGHQWLW KDQGD GLVFXVVHV WKH
FRQVHUYDWLRQ RI OLYLQJ KHULWDJH DQG KRZ LW QHHGV WR HQFRPSDVV WDQJLEOH DQG LQ
WDQJLEOH DORQJ ZLWK DXWKHQWLFLW VLDQ YDOXHV DUH LQYHVWLJDWHG HVSHFLDOO WKRVH
DURXQG WKH LGHD RI UHELUWK DQG KRZ WKH PD IRUJR PDWHULDO FRPSRQHQWV DQG HW
SUHVHUYH HVVHQFH ,Q WKH IROORZLQJ SDSHU )HUH VXJJHVWV WKDW WKH KLVWRU RI 1RUWK
PHULFDQ HWKQRJUDSKLF REMHFWV SOD LPSRUWDQW UROHV LQ WKH IRXQGLQJ RI )UHQFK
PXVHXPV DQG TXHVWLRQV ZKHWKHU WKH DVVRFLDWHG DUFKLYHV DQG SUHYHQWLYH FRQVHU
YDWLRQ SROLFLHV FRQWULEXWH WR WKHLU DXWKHQWLFLW *DOLQGR H[SORUHV %DXGULOODUG V
YLUWXH RI REMHFWV DQG HODERUDWHV RQ WKH FRQFHSW RI DXWKHQWLFLW E H[DPLQLQJ
IXQFWLRQDOLW 6KH XVHV WKH :DWHUFRORXU 0XVHXP LQ 0H[LFR DV D FDVH VWXG
WR H[DPLQH KRZ DQG ZK REMHFWV LQ WKH FROOHFWLRQ VKRXOG EH FRQVHUYHG + NLQ
Siegal and Uyeda use speci c examples from conservation projects on public
YLHZ DW WKH 0XVHXP RI )LQH UWV LQ %RVWRQ 86 WR H[SORUH KRZ SXEOLF GLVSOD
IRUFHV FRQVHUYDWRUV WR DUWLFXODWH WKH GHFLVLRQ PDNLQJ SURFHVV EHKLQG FRQVHUYDWLRQ
WUHDWPHQWV ,Q WKH QH[W FRQWULEXWLRQ ,PDL GLVFXVVHV 6LQJDSRUH V HQGHDYRXU WR
LQVFULEH +DZNHU FXOWXUH RQ 81(6 2 V /LVW RI WKH ,QWDQJLEOH XOWXUDO +HULWDJH
RI +XPDQLW DQG KRZ LW DLPV WR SUHVHUYH D PXOWL FXOWXUDO FXOLQDU KHULWDJH WKDW
LV IXQGDPHQWDO WR WKH 6LQJDSRUHDQ GLDVSRULF LGHQWLW /DQJ XVHV WKH :DUVDZ
5LVLQJ 0XVHXP 3RODQG WR GLVFXVV WKH FRQFHSW RI DXWKHQWLFLW DSSOLHG WR DQ
LFRQRJUDSKLF FROOHFWLRQ IURP WKH :RUOG :DU SHULRG 7KH HVVD HODERUDWHV WKH
XQLTXHQHVV RI WKH PXVHXP ZKLFK OLHV LQ WKH UHODWLRQVKLSV EHWZHHQ PDWHULDO
REMHFWV GLJLWDO FRSLHV DQG GLJLWDO UHFUHDWLRQV /HYHQVSLHO GLVFXVVHV DUFKLWHFWX
UDO UHSOLFDWLRQ DQG KRZ WKH TXHVWLRQ RI DXWKHQWLFLW DGGUHVVHG E UHSHWLWLRQ
UHOLDEO JURXQGHG LQ DUFKLWHFWXUDO IRUP XSKROGV FRQVHUYDWLRQ V FDSDFLW WR DF
TXLUH WUDQVPLW FRQWHVW DQG SURGXFH NQRZOHGJH RQ DUFKLWHFWXUH /ySH] /DUD
UHYLHZV WKH KLVWRU RI DFTXLVLWLRQV LQ RORPELDQ PXVHXPV LQ WKH WK DQG WK
FHQWXU WR XQFRYHU WKH EDFNJURXQG RI SRWWHU UHVWRUDWLRQ SHUIRUPHG E ORRWHUV
GXULQJ WKDW SHULRG DQG KRZ WKH LPSDFWHG XQGHUVWDQGLQJ RI SUH ROXPELDQ
SRWWHU ,Q WKH IROORZLQJ FKDSWHU 0DUJDULWL FRQVLGHUV WKH VKLIWV LQ FRQVHUYDWLRQ
DSSURDFKHV LQ UHFHQW HDUV IURP SUDFWLFDO WR PRUH LQYHVWLJDWLYH PHWKRGV DQG
H[DPLQHV WKH LPSDFW RI WKLV QHZ VNLOO VHW RQ WKH DXWKHQWLFLW RI WKH FRQVHUYHG
REMHFW 1DNDPXUD HODERUDWHV RQ SHUFHSWLRQV RI DXWKHQWLFLW LQ WKH FRQWH[W RI
WKH 6DNXEHL DPDPRWR &ROOHFWLRQ -DSDQ DQG DUJXHV ZKHWKHU LW LV SRVVLEOH WR
PDLQWDLQ WKH LGHQWLW RI WKH RULJLQDO WKURXJK WKH XVH RI GLJLWDO GDWD DQG UHSOLFD
WLRQ LQ FDVHV ZKHQ WKH OLIHWLPH RI WKH RULJLQDO PDWHULDO LV LQ ULVN 3DSDGRSRXORX
DQG *D]L XVH D FROOHFWLRQ IURP WKH 1DWLRQDO UFKDHRORJLFDO 0XVHXP LQ WKHQV
*UHHFH WR LQYHVWLJDWH TXHVWLRQV DURXQG DXWKHQWLFLW 7KURXJK D VHULHV RI LQ
WHUYLHZV WKH H[DPLQH WKH SURFHVV RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ UHODWHG GHFLVLRQ PDNLQJ
DV ZHOO DV WKH UROHV DXWKHQWLFLW SOD LQ WKH SURFHVV ,Q WKH IROORZLQJ SDSHU GH
5RHPHU H[DPLQHV WKH ZKDW LV WKH HVVHQFH RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ TXHVWLRQ E UHODWLQJ
LW WR *UHHN DQG KLQHVH SKLORVRSK DQG VXJJHVWV WKH LQFOXVLRQ RI /DR 7]X V
QRWLRQ RI 7DR LQ WKH FRQVHUYDWLRQ SURFHVV -LDQ 3DL 6KLK V LQYHVWLJDWHV ZD V IRU
FRQVHUYDWLRQ DQG H[KLELWLRQ ZRUN WR EULGJH DQG SURORQJ WKH SRWHQWLDOV HPERGLHG
LQ %XGGKLVW REMHFWV E ORRNLQJ DW WKH %XGGKLVW FRQWH[W PXVHXP SUDFWLFH DQG
FRQVHUYDWLRQ FDVH VWXGLHV 6ORJJHWW H[DPLQHV NQRZOHGJH WUDQVPLVVLRQ DQG KRZ
DXWKHQWLFLW LV FRQVWUXFWHG LQ GLYHUVH FRPPXQLWLHV LQ XVWUDOLD DQG 6RXWKHDVW
VLD 7KH DQDO VLV SURYLGHV HOHPHQWV WR FRQWHVW FXOWXUDO UHODWLYLVP DV D XVHIXO
FRQVWUXFW LQ FRQVHUYDWLRQ GHFLVLRQ PDNLQJ 0HL 7X XVHV WLPH EDVHG PHGLD GL
gital art and their need di erent levels of maintenance to consider FROOHFWLRQ
DQG FRQVHUYDWLRQ SKLORVRSKLFDO FKDOOHQJHV ERWK IURP PDWHULDO DQG FRQFHSWXDO
YLHZSRLQWV In the nal contribution, Walz combines di erent approaches of
WKHRUHWLFDO PXVHRORJ DQG VXJJHVWV WKUHH SHUVSHFWLYHV IRU DXWKHQWLFLW IURP
which di erent conservation strategies are derived.
Considerationsonthe
PreservationoftheAuthenti
city
ofCulturalHer i
tage:a
Conservator’sJourney
Stephanie Au ret, Ph.D.
HWW &RQVHUYDWLRQ ,QVWLWXWH /RV QJHOHV 86
- 3DXO HWW 7UXVW
I
ntr
oducti
on
7KH WKHPH RI WKH VHVVLRQ LQ WKH FRQWH[W RI ZKLFK WKLV SDSHU LV ZULWWHQ :KDW LV
the essence of conservation?” – highlights in itself the complexity of de ning the
FRQVHUYDWLRQ GLVFLSOLQH DQG DJUHHLQJ RQ LWV DLPV +DQQD + OOLQJ + OOLQJ D
proposed an interesting analysis of the evolution of the eld of conservation,
IURP D FHQWXULHV ORQJ FUDIW EDVHG SUDFWLFH RI UHVWRUDWLRQ´ WR D VFLHQFH EDVHG
SURIHVVLRQ ERWK REMHFW DQG PDWHULDO FHQWHUHG DGGLQJ WR WKHVH WZR WUDGLWLRQDO´
FRQVHUYDWLRQ DSSURDFKHV WKH RQH RI KXPDQLVWLF´ FRQVHUYDWLRQ ZKLFK LV ERXQG
WR FXOWXUH DQG SHRSOH DQG RULHQWHG WRZDUGV WKH YDOXHV HVWDEOLVKHG E WKHP ´
The importance of integrating cultural diversity to conservation re ection was
DOUHDG DW WKH FHQWHU RI WKH 1DUD RQIHUHQFH RQ XWKHQWLFLW KHOG LQ -DSDQ LQ
DQG WKH VHYHUDO VXEVHTXHQW PHHWLQJV DQG SXEOLFDWLRQV RQ WKH WRSLF 2QH
of the motivations of the 1994 Nara conference was to address the di culties
HQFRXQWHUHG E FRQVHUYDWRUV ZKHQ WKH DWWHPSWHG WR WUDQVIHU LQWR WKHLU SUDF
tice intellectual concepts that were not only not clearly de ned but limited to
D ZHVWHUQ DSSURDFK
The rst issue with such a term is, in the rst place, to agree on its de nition.
Authenticity is the quality of being authentic. From di erent dictionaries, au
thentic can be de ned as being authoritative or duly authorized; as being in
accordance with fact, as being true in substance; as being what it professes in
RULJLQ RU DXWKRUVKLS DV EHLQJ JHQXLQH 7KHUH LV D VWURQJ LGHD RI WUXWKIXOQHVV
DWWDFKHG WR WKH WHUP DXWKHQWLFLW ,Q UHJDUGV WR ZRUNV RI DUW DXWKHQWLF´ LV RIWHQ
XQGHUVWRRG DV RULJLQDO DV RSSRVHG WR D IDNH RU FRS (YHQ WKRXJK WKLV FRPSDULVRQ
VHHPV FOHDU WR PDQ LWV OLPLWDWLRQV DUH HDVLO UHFRJQL]HG ,Q IDFW WKH ERUGHUOLQH
EHWZHHQ WKHVH WHUPV LV YHU WKLQ ZKHQ DQ REMHFW LV FUHDWHG LW LV RULJLQDO LW
RQO EHFRPHV D IDNH RU D FRS LQ UHIHUHQFH WR DQRWKHU REMHFW )RU LQVWDQFH WKH
same piece can either be a fake or a copy; it depends entirely on what it is pre
tending to be: presented as a known copy of a known object, it is an honest copy;
SUHVHQWHG DV DQ RULJLQDO SLHFH IURP DQ HDUOLHU WLPH WKLV VDPH REMHFW EHFRPHV
D IDNH XWKHQWLF DV ZHOO DV RULJLQDO IDNH RU FRS PXVW DOO UHIHU WR VRPHWKLQJ
speci c. To de ne authentic as original results in limiting authenticity to the
WLPH RI WKH DUWZRUN V FUHDWLRQ RULJLQDO´ FDQ RQO UHIHU WR WKH PRPHQW ZKHQ WKH
REMHFW ZDV PDGH ZKHUHDV DXWKHQWLF´ GRHV QRW ,Q WHUPV RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ VXFK D
GLVWLQFWLRQ KDV D VWURQJ LPSDFW DV LW IRUFHV D PXFK PRUH FRPSOH[ LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ
RI WKH REMHFW HPEUDFLQJ DOO SDUWV RI LWV OLIH YHUVXV DQ LG OOLF RULJLQDO VWDWH YDOXHG
DERYH DQ VXEVHTXHQW QDWXUDO DJLQJ RU DOWHUDWLRQ
7KHVH HYDOXDWLRQ FULWHULD DUH WLJKWO OLQNHG DQG KDYH WR EH XVHG MRLQWO ([DPSOHV
of their application are illustrated in an earlier paper (Au ret, 2011) through case
VWXGLHV RI D WK century French ebony cabinet restored and modi ed in the 19WK
FHQWXU E ZHOO NQRZQ FDELQHW PDNHUV DQ WK century French table re nished
LQ WKH WK century with contemporary materials and, nally, an 18WK FHQWXU
American clock with its full aged nish history. In each case, the history of the
REMHFW ZDV GLVFXVVHG DQG FULWHULD IRU WKH HYDOXDWLRQ RI LWV DXWKHQWLFLW ZHLJKWHG
DJDLQVW HDFK RWKHU
Conser
vati
onandti
me
)ROORZLQJ WKH LGHD WKDW WKH DXWKHQWLFLW RI DQ DUWLIDFW HQFRPSDVVHV LWV HQWLUH OLIH
VWDUWLQJ ZLWK LWV FUHDWLRQ LQ D JLYHQ FRQWH[W PRYLQJ WKURXJK XVH RU GLVUHJDUG
and associated aging, potential modi cations in again, various contexts, we
QHHG WR ORRN LQWR WKH UHODWLRQVKLS RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ DQG WLPH OUHDG LQ
HVDUH %UDQGL LQ KLV 7KHRU RI 5HVWRUDWLRQ (Brandi, 1963), o ers an insight
IXO SHUVSHFWLYH RQ WKH SODFH RI D UHVWRUDWLRQ FDPSDLJQ ZLWKLQ WKH OLIH RI DQ
DUWZRUN HPSKDVL]LQJ LWV LPSDFW RQ WKH IXWXUH LQWHUSUHWDWLRQ RI WKH SLHFH ,Q
the chapter entitled “Time and restoration,” he identi es three times in the life
RI DQ REMHFW WKH GXUDWLRQ RU WLPH RI FUHDWLRQ ZKLFK HQGV RQ WKH GD WKH ZRUN
is completed by its creator; the LQWHUYDO RU WLPH IURP WKH HQG RI WKH FUHDWLRQ WR
today, continuing into the future; and nally the LQVWDQW ZKLFK FRUUHVSRQGV WR
WKH PRPHQW ZKHUH WKH DUWZRUN VWULNHV DQ LQGLYLGXDO FRQVFLRXVQHVV ´ PHDQLQJ
ZKHQ WKH DUWZRUN LV H[SHULHQFHG E DQ LQGLYLGXDO 0DQ LQVWDQWV DUH SHUSH
WXDWHG GXULQJ WKH LQWHUYDO UHVWRUDWLRQ FDPSDLJQ FDQ EH VHHQ DV DQ LQVWDQW
VLQFH LW KDSSHQV GXULQJ WKH LQWHUYDO IURP DQ LQGLYLGXDO SHUVSHFWLYH EXW LW EHDUV
signi cant consequences for future LQVWDQWV WR FRPH DV LW LPSDFWV ZKDW YLHZHUV
ZLOO H[SHULHQFH QH[W 7KHUH DUH WZR YHU LPSRUWDQW UHODWHG FRQFHSWV WKDW %UDQGL
GHYHORSV LQ KLV 7KHRU RI 5HVWRUDWLRQ: rst that a restorer should never attempt
WR JR EDFN LQWR WKH GXUDWLRQ time, which is over; secondly that we only restore
5HVWRUDWLRQ´ LV XVHG KHUH DV WKH WHUP XVHG E %UDQGL , SUHIHU WR XVH WKH WHUP FRQVHUYDWLRQ´ IRU
WKH UHVW RI WKH DUWLFOH DV HW PRORJLFDOO UHVWRUDWLRQ´ VXJJHVWV D UHWXUQ WR D IRUPHU VWDWH ZKLFK LV
QRW QHFHVVDULO WKH DLP RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ
2. I used this approach to interpret the history of two pieces of furniture in an earlier paper (Au ret,
WKH PDWHULDO YHUVXV WKH LGHD 7KRXJK RQH PD VHH OLPLWV LQ %UDQGL V WKHRU KH
QHYHUWKHOHVV HQFRXUDJHG D PRUH LQFOXVLYH FRQFHSWLRQ RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ SUDFWLFH
LQFOXGLQJ DUWLVWLF KLVWRULFDO DQG DHVWKHWLF FULWHULD PDUNLQJ D WUDQVLWLRQ IURP D
UHVWULFWLYH RULJLQDO VWDWH´ DQG PDWHULDO FHQWHUHG DSSURDFK
Conser
vati
onandc
ontext
The former thoughts lead to a third angle of re ection: the relationship of conser
YDWLRQ WR FRQWH[W ZKLFK FDQ LQFOXGH VSDWLDO KLVWRULFDO FXOWXUDO DQG KXPDQ
FRQWH[WV 7KHUH LV QR FOHDU GLVWLQFWLRQ EHWZHHQ FDWHJRULHV RI FRQWH[WV WKH DUH
LQWHUWZLQHG OLNH WKH FULWHULD IRU WKH HYDOXDWLRQ RI DXWKHQWLFLW VXJJHVWHG HDUOLHU
XULQJ WKH H[SHUWV PHHWLQJ PHQWLRQHG HDUOLHU D FRQFHUQ UDLVHG UHSHDWHGO ZDV
WKH JDS DW OHDVW LQ ZHVWHUQ FXOWXUHV EHWZHHQ WKH YDOXH DWWDFKHG WR SUHVHUYLQJ
decorative surfaces and that attached to preserving the ne arts. We discussed
the example of a church in France where the level of attention given to gura
WLYH SDLQWLQJV ZDV GLVWLQFWLYHO KLJKHU WKDQ WKDW JLYHQ WR GHFRUDWLYH VXUIDFHV ,Q
PDQ LQVWDQFHV PRUH LQWHUHVW LV JLYHQ WR WKH DSSHDUDQFH WKDQ WKH PDWHULDOLW RI
GHFRUDWLYH VXUIDFHV +HUH DJDLQ UDLVLQJ DZDUHQHVV RI FRQVHUYDWLRQ DOWHUQDWLYHV
WR WKRVH ZKR LQWHUDFW ZLWK WKHVH GHFRUDWHG VSDFHV FRXOG KDYH YDOXH
XULQJ D UHFHQW WULS WR KLQD WKH FRQVHUYDWRUV , PHW JHQHURXVO VKDUHG WKHLU
WUHDWPHQW DSSURDFKHV VXFK DV WKHLU SUHIHUHQFH IRU XVLQJ WUDGLWLRQDO PDWHULDOV WR
WUHDW REMHFWV ZKLOH SUHVHUYLQJ DQ DJHG DSSHDUDQFH DQG QRW UHSODFLQJ HOHPHQWV
LQ WKH DEVHQFH RI D UHOLDEOH VRXUFH WR UHSURGXFH WKHP 7KLV UHVRQDWHV ZLWK SUDF
WLFHV LQ -DSDQ ZKHUH QDWLRQDO ODZV SURKLELW UHVWRUHUV IURP PDNLQJ FKDQJHV WR
cultural properties (Williams & Strahan, 2008) ,Q ZHVWHUQ FXOWXUHV ZH WHQG
to use conservation materials that di er from the ones present on the treated
)URP FRQWULEXWLRQ E 6KRVDL .LWDPXUD +H DGGV WKDW ZKHQ FKDQJHV DUH XQDYRLGDEOH LQ WUHDWPHQW D
VSHFLDO UHSRUW LV UHTXLUHG ,I WKH REMHFW V RULJLQDO DSSHDUDQFH QHHGV WR EH VHHQ D UHSOLFD LV PDGH´ S
REMHFW RIWHQ LQ WKH QDPH RI WKH SULQFLSOH RI UHYHUVLELW ´ EXW DOVR WR EH DEOH WR
di erentiate original materials from various treatment campaigns. Nevertheless,
LW LV P XQGHUVWDQGLQJ WKDW LQ VRPH FXOWXUHV WKH PDWHULDOV XVHG LQ WKH PDQXIDF
ture of cultural artifacts can carry spiritual signi cance, which may lead to the
XVH RI WUDGLWLRQDO PDWHULDOV DQG WHFKQLTXHV LQ FRQVHUYDWLRQ WUHDWPHQWV DPRQJ
RWKHU PRWLYDWLRQV VXFK DV WKH FRQWLQXLW RI FUDIWVPDQVKLS VNLOOV DQG NQRZOHGJH
7KLV EULQJV XV EDFN WR WKH TXHVWLRQ RI EDODQFH EHWZHHQ WKH PDQ DVSHFWV WKDW
IRUP WKH DXWKHQWLFLW RI DQ REMHFW DV ZHOO DV WR WKH LPSRUWDQFH RI WDNLQJ LQWR
FRQVLGHUDWLRQ DQG UHVSHFWLQJ WKH FRQWH[W RI ZKLFK WKH REMHFW LV D SDUW
Conc
lusi
on
,Q P MRXUQH DV D FRQVHUYDWRU , KDYH ZLWQHVVHG PDQ DWWLWXGHV WRZDUGV FRQVHU
YDWLRQ GHFLVLRQV IURP DLPLQJ WR EULQJ EDFN DQ REMHFW WR LWV VXSSRVHGO RULJLQDO
FRQGLWLRQ´ E HUDVLQJ WUDFHV RI LWV SDVVDJH WKURXJK WLPH WR IUHH]LQJ DQ REMHFW LQ
a speci c state to tell the story of a given historical context, to the “do as little as
SRVVLEOH´ DSSURDFK WR SUHVHUYH WKH PD[LPXP SRVVLEOH RI DQ REMHFW V KLVWRU DQG
allow for further study. There is not one right approach; each case is unique and
GHSHQGV RQ ZKDW WKH DUWLIDFW PHDQV WR XV KRZ ZH ZDQW WR LQWHUDFW ZLWK LW DQG
ZKDW VWRU ZH ZDQW LW WR WHOO XV DQG WR JHQHUDWLRQV WR FRPH 7KRXJK ZH FDQ OHDUQ
DERXW REMHFWV WKURXJK WKHLU PDWHULDOLW DQG ZH SK VLFDOO DFW RQ PDWHULDO RQO
WKH KXPDQ GLPHQVLRQ FDQQRW EH IRUJRWWHQ ,W LV DOVR LPSRUWDQW WR UHPHPEHU
WKDW HDFK FXOWXUH H[SHULHQFHV LWV FXOWXUDO SDWULPRQ LQ LWV RZQ ZD DQG WKLV LV
WR EH UHVSHFWHG 2XU SURIHVVLRQ KDV UHDFKHG D OHYHO RI HPDQFLSDWLRQ WKDW DOORZV
LW WR SRVLWLRQ LWVHOI ZLWK VWUHQJWK LQ WKH EURDGHU SUHVHUYDWLRQ FRPPXQLW UHDFK
RXW WR YDULRXV VWDNHKROGHUV DQG WKH FRPPXQLWLHV DQG DGYRFDWH IRU LWV EHOLHIV
Ref
erenc
es
Allen, Z., & Wegwitz, L. (2014). The two make a pair: di erentiated treatment
RI D SDLU RI JLOGHG VWRROV GLVSOD HG LQ WKH IXUQLWXUH JDOOHU DW WKH
9LFWRULD DQG OEHUW 0XVHXP ,Q * ODERQH (G &RQVHUYLQJ FRQWH[W
5HODWLQJ REMHFW WUHDWPHQW WR FROOHFWLRQV DQG VHWWLQJV 3URFHHGLQJV RI
WKH FRQIHUHQFH KHOG DW WKH :DOODFH &ROOHFWLRQ /RQGRQ E WKH LOGLQJ
DQG HFRUDWLYH 6XUIDFHV URXS RI WKH ,QVWLWXWH RI &RQVHUYDWLRQ
0DUFK /RQGRQ UFKHW SH ERRNV
Williams, J. L., Strahan, D. K., & Asian Art Museum of San Francisco (Eds.).
7KH FRQVHUYDWLRQ RI VLDQ ODFTXHU FDVH VWXGLHV DW WKH VLDQ
UW 0XVHXP RI 6DQ )UDQFLVFR 6DQ )UDQFLVFR VLDQ UW 0XVHXP RI
6DQ )UDQFLVFR KRQJ 0RRQ /HH HQWHU IRU VLDQ UW DQG XOWXUH