Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Template IMRaD
Research Template IMRaD
INTRODUCTION
- Left aligned
- Double-space
- Follow the funnel-type of discussion (start with general information to the details)
following questions:
Hypotheses
1. Insert hypothesis
2. Insert hypothesis
3. Insert hypothesis
2
To attain a conceptual framework for this study, the researchers have checked the
current theories
conceptual framework:
3
Figure 1
The Ilonggos’ Assessment of their Dining Experience and Satisfaction in Casual Dining
SAMPLE ONLY
Dining Experience
SAMPLE ONLY
Respondents’ Profile:
Age
Sex
Monthly income
Educational attainment
SAMPLE ONLY
Customer Satisfaction
Product
Price
Place
Promotion
People
Process
Physical Evidence
- Define the important words in the title and the sociodemographic profile
Insert the month and year of the conduct of study, total number of respondents,
sampling technique.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study aims to insert general objective. Insert research design and research
method to be used.
Table 1
Category f %
A. Entire Group XXX 100.0
B. Sex
X X X
X X X
C. Age
X X X
X X X
D. Monthly Income
X X X
X X X
X X X
E. Educational Attainment
X X X
X X X
X X X
X X X
Data-gathering Instrument
The researcher used a five-point Likert scale and the participants were given four
Response Score
Strongly agree 5
Agree 4
Neutral 3
Disagree 2
Strongly Disagree 1
To interpret the mean scores, the following scale of means and corresponding
Data-gathering Procedure
This study will be conducted in Month Year. In this study, the data collection
First, the insert explanation of the validation process of the questionnaire (who
modified, etc.)
8
(where was the reliability test conducted, number of respondents during the reliability
Ethical Considerations
Eligibility (Inclusion/Exclusion).
Conflict of interest.
Risks.
Benefits.
Voluntary participation.
Who to contact.
9
The .05 alpha level will serve as the criterion for the acceptance or rejection of the
null hypothesis.
10
Table XXX
The XXX
Category M SD Description
A. Entire Group XXX XXX XXX
Legend: 4.21 - 5.00 (Excellent Dining Experience); 3.41 - 4.20 (Very Good Dining Experience); 2.61 3.40 (Fair Dining
Experience); 1.81 - 2.60 (Poor Dining Experience); 1.00 - 1.80 (Very Poor Dining Experience)
11
Table XXX
Significant Differences XXX (Tables will depend on the statistical tools to be used)
Mean
Category N H df p
Rank
Conclusions
Recommendations
advanced:
REFERENCES
Andaleeb, Syed & Conway, Carolyn. (2006). Customer satisfaction in the restaurant
APPENDICES
15
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Reliability Certificate
UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN
COLLEGE OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Iloilo City
20
Appendix E
Appendix F
Translation Certificate
UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN
COLLEGE OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Iloilo City
22
Appendix G
Appendix H
Appendix I
Appendix J
Data-gathering Instrument
UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN
COLLEGE OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Iloilo City
27
Appendix K
Progress Report
UNIVERSITY OF SAN AGUSTIN
COLLEGE OF COMMERCE
DEPARTMENT OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
Iloilo City
28
Appendix L
Appendix M