Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Plan For The Reuse of A Building in Milan
Business Plan For The Reuse of A Building in Milan
the new artistic spot in Loreto for art making and expositions .
Students:
Mennuti Lorenzo - 967730
Group 18 Nakajima Kohei - 963271
REUSE
The building of the drinking water was used in the first half of 20th century to pick up and di-
stribute the drinking water directly from the aquifer, but was then dismissed and abandoned some
decades ago.
It is part of a net of all similar buildings spread over the northern part of the city of Milan, being
all abandoned or refurbished. They are part of the history of the city and has a high cultural va-
lue.
Our main idea is to renovate and open this abandoned place to citi-
zens, introducing it again into the dynamic cultural life of NoLo taking
advantage of its amazing position
LOCATION
Parco Trotter
Abandoned
water building
NoLo
via Padova
The buildings we would like to re-
AREA
novate and open to the city are two,
one is a kind of entrance building for
the public park Trotter, the other is
the drinking water building.
in the cities of Italy . This time they want to experiment by re-using an old building in a central
Their goal is to experiment a new kind of facility that promotes socialization and a sustai-
nable use of the city and its manufacts.
Their need is to find an activity that is fitting in the abandoned building and in the surroun-
dings, suitable for the life of the neighbourhood.
Their expectation is to create a place where people can experience the dynamic social life
of NoLo.
BUSINESS MODELS
In order to choose the kind of activity that is most suitable for this building, we performed a
_ Trotter Pop Up
A place where different commercial activities could be ran for a limited time period.
_Shared Kitchen
A well furnished kitchen to be shared between different chefs, with different customers.
KEY PARTNERS KEY ACTIVITIES
TROTTER POP UP
VALUE CUSTOMER CUSTOMER
PROPOSITION RELATIONSHIP SEGMENTS
Popular brands Renting shop spaces
for a limited time pe- The Trotter Pop Up is Discount depending Brands who want to
Event creators (mu-
riod an event space in the on the duration of the sell objects or services
nicipality or brands
heart of NoLo where activity related to an event
themselves) Ordering and clea-
shops or other event
ning the space after Discount for activities Universities or other
Advertising compa- related activities can
the renting involving more citi- companies willing to
nies take place for a limi-
zens and the school promote themselves
ted time period.
or something else
Maximize the return to the Maximize the cultural potential to the community
community
Maximize the social commitment
CRITERIA
Criteria Sub Criteria Scale
Construction period
Minmize the initial cost
SUB CRITERIA
Environmental influence Indicator: Qualitative (Cost)
Environmental
Dimension
Compatibility with the community Description: Since we already fix the location, here we evaluate the initial cost so as to start the business
Effective use of the outdoor space activity. We set the scale from 1 to 4 corresponding to which level of interventions is needed to host the
Competitiveness activities we want.
Cultural Cultural potential to the community
Dimension
Social commitment
Level 1: install external walls Level 3: install furniture
Level 2: install internal walls Level 4: install special equipment
Initial cost
Competitiveness
Construction period
Minmize the environmental influence
SUB CRITERIA
Environmental influence Indicator: Binary (Cost)
Environmental Compatibility with the community Description: To mitigate the impact on the surroundings, we would like to evaluate the envirnmental
aspect depending on the presence of the polluted air released.
Dimension
Competitiveness
Initial cost
+ High compatibility
with the young popula-
ted community
0 Depends on the events
we host + High compatibility
with the young popula-
ted community
Economic
Dimension
Initial cost
Construction period
SUB CRITERIA
Maximize the effective use of the outdoor space
Environmental influence Indicator: Qualitative (Benefit)
Environmental Compatibility with the community Description: Since the building is located in the public park, we would like to use the outdoor space to
enhance the public nature of the place.
Dimension
Competitiveness
Initial cost
Competitiveness
Art LAB Pop Up Share Kitchen
Cultural Cultural potential to the community
Dimension
Social commitment
5 0 35
400m
Economic
Dimension
Initial cost
Construction period
SUB CRITERIA
Maximize the cultural potential to the community
Environmental influence Indicator: Ratio (Benefit)
Environmental
Dimension
Compatibility with the community Description: We evaluate the cultural potential of the project to build the place also for social activities.
Effective use of the outdoor space For each program we count the number of generations we can satisfy.
Competitiveness
4 -children
-young
-middle age
2 -young
-middle age 3 -young
-middle age
-elderly
-elderly
Initial cost
2 -exhibition
-art workshop 0 Consider there are no
social activities since
the events are not fixed
1 -cooking lesson
PERFORMANCE MATRIX
PERFORMANCE MATRIX
PERFORMANCE MATRIX
STANDARDIZED PERFORMANCE MATRIX
Values are calculated by the formulas below depending on whether a benefit or cost the sub-criteria is.
Example:
(Benefit) (Cost)
Art LAB = 4/4 = 1 Art LAB = -5/35 + 1 = 0.86
Pop-up = 2/4 = 0.5 Pop-up = -0/35 + 1 = 1
Share kitchen = 3/4 = 0.75 Share kitchen = -35/35 + 1 = 0
WEIGHT ASSINMENTS
SUB-CRITERIA WEIGHT ASSIGNMENTS
From the graph, we can see the alternative of Art LAB as the most suitable one among those three programs we
considered. Art LAB shows high values for the environmental and cultural dimension which we take into consideration
more while the economic dimension value is lower than Pop Up.
RESULTS
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
I n t h e s e n s i t iv i t y a n a ly s i s , t h e w e i g h t
propor tions are distributed equally. The
performance can be difined as the sum of each
weight multiplied by its standard value.
In the sensitivity analysis, we still can see the alternative of Art LAB as the most suitable one while Pop up comes the
second. The environmental and cultural dimensions are highly evaluated in Art LAB also here.
RENOVATION COST
INITIAL COST
For considering the renovation of the buildings we referred to the book Prezzi Tipologie Edilizie
(DEI, 2019). From the chapter D4 we took the average cost per sqm for works similar to the
one we are hypotizing to do with the percentage of incidence for each single work. With some
changes we obtained our final list of works and an estimation of the total cost of the renovation.
A=128 sqm
A=200 sqm
FURNITURE COST
INITIAL COST
D
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW
WAAC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital)
From the table, we take "real estate (operations & services)" as the industry which is the most similar one as our activity.
Assumptions
The time scale of the activity is 12 years and
we assume the building renovation in the
first year. Thus, 100% of the renovation cost
applys only in the first year and we use WACC
as the discount rate.
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW
Cost and Income in DCF analysis
For the monthly cost and income, we convert them into yearly with the coefficients multiplied to each of them.
Cost activity
Here we anticipate the reduction of 70% of the building renovation cost with the help of the municipality.
Summary
NPV
Case3: Vacancy 40% + Municipality takes 30% of the building renovation cost -76000€
Case4: Vacancy 40% + Municipality takes 70% of the building renovation cost 45000€
Market value in the end of the second year: 44000€ / 0.066 = 667000€
Grant: 95% of the market value
Market value
Here we simulate the situation where we buy our activity from the municipality even though it's unlikely to happen since the building is public
and our object is not to gain as much profit as possible. We are going to buy the activity in the third year having the grant of the 95% of the
market value to make the business feasible. We don't consider the rent from the third year because since then the building will be our property. In
In conclusion we can say that if we consider a vacancy around 20% the activity is feasible,
but the cost of renovation would be so high compared to the income that the gain would be very
low.
For this reason we would need the public to pay at least part of the renovation, or the
If we consider instead a higher vacancy of the 40% we would need the public to pay at least
the 70% of the renovation cost if not the activity would not be feasible at all.
Instead of the low expectation of the income, the business would provide more social activities
and the effective use for the community around the site.
REFERENCES
https://www.comune.milano.it/aree-tematiche/casa/affitto-accessibile/canone-concordato
4. Damodaran Online
http://www.damodaran.com
5. Agenzia Entrate
https://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/portale/web/guest/home