Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Step by Step Guide Quality System Remediation
A Step by Step Guide Quality System Remediation
A Step by Step Guide Quality System Remediation
Guide to Quality
System Remediation
Larry Stevens
As we said before, very often the details you uncovered about the nature of a gap offer most if not
all of the information you need to close it. If, for example, it’s clear that a deficiency was caused by
staff being too busy to devote themselves to one of their responsibilities because of another being
introduced, the best solutions are evident by the nature of the problem.
ither reallocate existing resources and adjust any project timelines that are impacted so capacity
can be maintained, or add the qualified resources needed to fill the gap without affecting other
initiatives. In short, don’t overcomplicate or under-complicate your findings. Listen to what your gaps
tell you about the nature of their root causes.
Note these needs as soon as possible along with the skills, knowledge, and level of
experience you’ll need in a contracted resource.
You may discover that some gaps threaten other projects or initiatives within your
organization. In these situations (or other situations where time constraints prompt priority
action) document who will be needed, when they’ll be needed, and consider how an external
resourcing partner could quickly provide the resources you need to protect your project
deadlines.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Quality System Remediation
Although these general steps can be used to craft an action plan for closing gaps for which
solutions are more or less apparent, gaps that point to more complex problems (and thus more
complex fixes) should be treated with a more comprehensive investigation and analysis in
order to determine the full scope of the issue and the best path toward solving it.
Backlogs are a prime example of a complex problem that requires a more in-depth follow-up
analysis. And while these issues are often the result of a number of contributing factors that
need to be untangled and addressed one by one, eliminating them can be relatively
straightforward when approached systematically.
Consider the following steps when facing a backlog or use them as a generalized template for
addressing other kinds of complex quality system issues:
1. Delineate and confine the backlog (or other quality system issue)
Separate currently scheduled work from backlogged work and define a clear boundary
between them, usually with a date. In the case of another kind of issue, the key here is
quarantining the problem. This is critical for being able to scope the work needed to eliminate
and measure the progress of that work, all while not getting in the way of other ongoing
projects.
With the backlog or other issue identified and separated, you can measure the true scope of
the problem. While different metrics lend themselves to different situations, the result should
be in the form of hard numbers. (For example, the number of impacted documents or the hours
of work required to process them).
Once you have a handle on the size and scope of the backlog or other issue at-hand, turn your
attention to the processes that may be contributing to it.
Process mapping is the best way to visualize any weak points or bottlenecks that might exist.
Keep in mind, the entire root cause probably won’t be something you can circle on a chart. It’s
often a combination of factors you have to untangle.
For example, perhaps productivity is stalling despite having brand new manufacturing
equipment in the facility. In this situation, the requirements of operating the new equipment
may not be reflected in the processes currently in place. By mapping this process out, you can
spot the weak link as a resourcing problem in validation, for instance.
Conduct a kind of “mini root cause analysis” to evaluate the effectiveness and relevance of the
process and whether you have the right people and the right number of people in place to
support it.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Quality System Remediation
4. Remediate
Based on the nature of the problem that prompted the gap you're looking to close, and its now-
quantified scope, there are two practical ways to eliminate it: either get more resources (such as
hiring contracted specialists), change the way you do things, (for example, adopting an ad-hoc
process for managing the backlog through expedited procedures, shorter forms, etc.), or ideally
both.
Use the simple comparison matrix below to understand the relative advantages and
disadvantages of each approach and how a combination can offer extreme value in terms of
efficiency and corrective/preventive action.
A Step-by-Step Guide to Quality System Remediation
5. Review
It’s one thing to get rid of a backlog, but it’s another to eliminate it in a way that prevents it
from coming right back. After closing the process gaps and eliminating the backlog, have a
meaningful close-out meeting around a few key questions:
What caused the backlog in the first place, and was this source external or internal?
How could you have seen this coming, and what indicators should you monitor going
forward to prevent it from happening again?
What new systems, processes, procedures, and resources need to be put in place and
are they there now?
This article was originally published on The FDA Group Website. The FDA Group, LLC and its contributors will not be liable for any
errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner and its contributors will not be liable
for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.
Larry Stevens, RAC has held almost every field position within FDA during his 21-
year career with the Agency. He has over 18 years of experience in the medical
device industry, rising from an RA Manager to Vice President of RA/QA/Clinical for
major class III device manufacturers. He specializes in planning, creating, and
auditing quality systems as well as creating clinical plans, including protocol
development, case report form development, and implementing and managing
clinical trials. He also assists in design control to meet FDA requirements. Larry is
a professional speaker who regularly trains on all aspects of FDA requirements
while offering practical, successful solutions to FDA problems.
SoftExpert EQM is the most comprehensive enterprise quality management software (EQMS). It helps
companies to achieve and maintain ISO 9001 certification through automated, highly interactive quality
processes tailored to an organization’s specific products, operations and business practices.
As a modular and scalable solution platform, SoftExpert Quality Management Software seamlessly integrates
all key quality initiatives, including process mapping, documented information (SOP – standard operating
procedures, work instructions and records), non-conformance reports (NCR/NCMR), corrective/preventive
actions (CAPA), quality indicators (KPIs). The solution also manages supplier relations, customer complaints,
quality audits, competence and training, quality risks and controls, quality inspection and statistical process
control, increasing QMS agility and robustness.
With SoftExpert EQMS, companies can comply with multiple regulations and standards, including ISO
9001:2015, FDA, ICH, and EU. The solution easily manages, tracks and reports all quality metrics in real-time,
streamlining informed decisions. It allows companies to coordinate and drive business activities, meet
customer and regulatory requirements and improve their effectiveness and efficiency on a continual basis.
Disclaimer: The content of this publication may not, in whole or in part, be copied or reproduced without prior authorization from SoftExpert Software. This
publication is provided by SoftExpert and/or its network of affiliates strictly for informational purposes, without any guarantee of any kind. The only guarantees
related to SoftExpert products and services are those contained within a contract. Some product functionalities and characteristics presented herein may be
optional or may depend on the makeup of the offer(s) acquired. The content of this material is subject to change without prior notice.