Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dm-Module 3
Dm-Module 3
Disaster risk management is the application of disaster risk reduction policies and strategies to
prevent new disaster risk, reduce existing disaster risk and manage residual risk, contributing to
the strengthening of resilience and reduction of disaster losses.
Annotation: Disaster risk management actions can be distinguished between prospective disaster
risk management, corrective disaster risk management and compensatory disaster risk
management, also called residual risk management.
Prospective disaster risk management activities address and seek to avoid the development of
new or increased disaster risks. They focus on addressing disaster risks that may develop in future
if disaster risk reduction policies are not put in place. Examples are better land-use planning or
disaster-resistant water supply systems.
Corrective disaster risk management activities address and seek to remove or reduce disaster
risks which are already present and which need to be managed and reduced now. Examples are the
retrofitting of critical infrastructure or the relocation of exposed populations or assets.
Compensatory disaster risk management activities strengthen the social and economic
resilience of individuals and societies in the face of residual risk that cannot be effectively reduced.
They include preparedness, response and recovery activities, but also a mix of different financing
instruments, such as national contingency funds, contingent credit, insurance and reinsurance and
social safety nets.
Local and indigenous peoples’ approach to disaster risk management is the recognition and use of
traditional, indigenous and local knowledge and practices to complement scientific knowledge in
disaster risk assessments and for the planning and implementation of local disaster risk
management.
Disaster risk management plans set out the goals and specific objectives for reducing disaster
risks together with related actions to accomplish these objectives. They should be guided by the
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015‑2030 and considered and coordinated within
relevant development plans, resource allocations and programme activities. National-level plans
need to be specific to each level of administrative responsibility and adapted to the different social
and geographical circumstances that are present. The time frame and responsibilities for
implementation and the sources of funding should be specified in the plan. Linkages to sustainable
development and climate change adaptation plans should be made where possible.
What do you think the Sendai Framework means for disaster risk reduction?
The Sendai Framework on Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030) is an ambitious agreement that
sets out the overall objective to substantially reduce disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods
and health and in the economic, physical, social, cultural and environmental assets of persons,
businesses, communities and countries.
Mitigation
Preparedness
Response
Recovery
Phase 1: Mitigation
Meaning: To prevent future emergencies and take steps to minimize their effects
The “mitigation” phase occurs before a disaster takes place. Here, an organization will take steps
to protect people and property, while also decreasing risks and consequences from a given disaster
situation. The organization’s main goal is to reduce vulnerability to disaster impacts (such as
property damage, injuries and loss of life).
Examples of “mitigation” may include conducting a property inspection to discover ways to
fortify the building against damage. The organization may also revise zoning and land-use
management to further prevent or reduce the impact of a disaster.
Phase 2: Preparedness
The “preparedness” phase also occurs before a disaster takes place. Here, an organization attempts
to understand how a disaster might affect overall productivity and the bottom line. The
organization will also provide appropriate education while putting preparedness measures into
place.
Examples of “preparedness” may include hosting training, education, drills, tabletop exercises
and full-scale exercises on disaster preparedness. This ensures that stakeholders know what to do
in the event of an emergency. Organizations may also assemble a business continuity team to
assemble a strategic plan that allows the business to recover after a crisis. The team will create a
business continuity plan outline and list of resources needed to recover from a disaster.
Phase 3: Response
Meaning: To protect people and property in the wake of an emergency, disaster or crisis
The “response” phase occurs in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. Organizations must focus
their attention on addressing immediate threats to people, property and business. Occupant safety
and wellbeing largely depends on its preparedness levels before disaster strikes.
The most notable example of the “response” phase is to ensure that people are out of harm’s way.
The organization will then move on to assess damage, implement disaster response plans, triage
cleanup efforts and start resource distribution as necessary. Businesses will also need to navigate
building closures, preliminary damage assessments and hampered communication with
stakeholders (like staff, vendors and suppliers) due to shutdowns
As the response period progresses, focus will typically shift from immediate emergency issues to
conducting repairs, restoring utilities, re-establishing operations and cleaning up. The organization
will also need to begin planning the reconstruction of damaged infrastructure.
Phase 4: Recovery
The “recovery” phase takes place after a disaster. This phase is the restoration of an organization
following any impacts from a disaster. By this time, the organization has achieved at least some
degree of physical, environmental, economic and social stability.
The recovery phase of a disaster can last anywhere from six months to a year (or even longer
depending on the severity of the incident).
An example of “recovery” is creating strategic protocols and action plans to address the most
serious impacts of a disaster. An organization will work to obtain new resources, rebuild or create
partnerships, and implement effective recovery strategies. The organization will also want to take
steps to reduce financial burdens, rebuild damaged structures and reduce vulnerability to future
disasters
Historically, dealing with disasters focused on emergency response, but towards the end of the
20th century it was increasingly recognized that disasters are not natural (even if the associated
hazard is) and that it is only by reducing and managing conditions of hazard, exposure and
vulnerability that we can prevent losses and alleviate the impacts of disasters.
Since we cannot reduce the severity of natural hazards, the main opportunity for reducing risk lies
in reducing vulnerability and exposure.
Reducing these two components of risk requires identifying and reducing the underlying drivers
of risk, which are particularly related to poor economic and urban development choices and
practice, degradation of the environment, poverty and inequality and climate change, which create
and exacerbate conditions of hazard, exposure and vulnerability.
Addressing these underlying risk drivers will reduce disaster risk, lessen the impacts of climate
change and, consequently, maintain the sustainability of development.
MEASURES FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
Risk reduction measures are prevent management activities designed to either directly enforce or
empower local actors to contain local human vulnerability and hazard, and enhance adaptive
capacity and actions in the long and short term. Several steps can be taken to address heatwave
risk and the following input variables are assessed for their relevance in evaluating such risk
management systems.
Hazard and vulnerability consideration in the urban planning and the construction of new
infrastructure can greatly reduce vulnerability resulting from the built environment. Although such
actions have limited impact in mitigating hazard-related risk in the context of cities such as London
where changes in existing land use and urban design are financially untenable, management of
land use and urban planning can be a key input variable for assessing long-term risk reduction in
other contexts.
2. Policy and financial support for alleviating risk or retrofitting buildings in high risk areas
The infrastructure of public buildings and assets such as community spaces and transport networks
are often not easily adapted to an increasing risk of climate-related hazards. This includes the
network of hospitals and residential care buildings in which those that are already vulnerable
reside, thereby amplifying the risk posed by hot weather. The provision of financial support or
policy initiatives to undertake adaption measures to make public infrastructure more resilient to
heatwaves or drought events can be critical in reducing vulnerability.
The predominantly human impact of heatwaves and drought hazards makes behavioral changes
important in reducing vulnerability. Widespread dissemination of information on drought and
hazard risk is needed to influence the diverse range of social, financial, ecological, cultural, and
institutional activities affected. Public guidelines on adopting alternative practices and updating
infrastructure can assist in the long-term resilience to hazard events. Early warning systems are a
potent component of public information since heatwaves and drought are both preceded by days
of hot or dry weather. This allows time for issuing health warnings and information before the
possible onset of extreme temperatures and water scarcity.
Monitoring and regulation of safety processes and procedures in place to mitigate and reduce
vulnerability to climate change hazards such as drought and heatwaves need to be carried out in
order to ensure relevant and robust risk management.
DISASTER PREVENTION
Mitigation and prevention efforts aim to reduce the potential damage and suffering that disasters
can cause. While disaster management cannot prevent disasters, it can prevent them from
becoming compounded as a result of neglecting causal factors and manageable risks. Mitigation
specifically refers to actions taken that can lessen the severity of a disaster’s impact. Investing in
measures that limit hazards can greatly reduce the burden of disasters.
Disaster Mitigation is the cornerstone of emergency management. It’s the ongoing effort to lessen
the impact disasters have on people and property. Mitigation involves keeping homes away from
floodplains, engineering bridges to withstand earthquakes, creating and enforcing effective
building codes to protect property from hurricanes, and more.
Mitigation is defined as “sustained action that reduces or eliminates long-term risk to people and
property from natural hazards and their effects.” It describes the ongoing effort at the federal, state,
local and individual levels to lessen the impact of disasters upon our families, homes, communities
and economy.
Through the application of mitigation technologies and practices, our society can ensure that fewer
Americans and their communities become victims of natural disasters. For example, mitigation
measures can be applied to strengthen your home, so that your family and belongings are better
protected from floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural hazards. They can be utilized to
help business and industry to avoid damage to their facilities and remain operational in the face of
catastrophe. Mitigation technologies can be used to strengthen hospitals, fire stations, and other
critical service facilities so that they can remain operational or reopen more quickly after an event.
In addition, mitigation measures can help reduce disaster losses and suffering so that there is less
demand for money and resources in the aftermath.
In practice, mitigation can take many forms. It can involve actions such as:
DISASTER RESPONSE
Disaster responses are the set of activities taken during a disaster or immediately following a
disaster, directed towards saving life and protecting property.
The activities that deal with the effect of disaster may include medical care, evacuation, search
and rescue, provision of emergency water, food and shelter, debris removal and stabilization of
unsafe buildings and landforms.
Information and resources are two (2) essential requirements for effective response without which
plans and efforts at responding will not yield the anticipated results.
Information
An early warning system provides vital information for effective response operation
despite the unpredictability of some disaster events.
An effective warning system must be robust to transmit warnings as early as practicable.
Information gained from these systems could help in the planning and decision-making as
well as inform the general public.
Resources
Resources form an essential component of disaster response.
The need for disaster management organisations to be resource ready cannot be over
emphasised considering the untimely occurrence of disasters, which most often is on short
notice.
The ability to mobilise the needed resources on short notice is most often hampered by
many factors. Its effect on systems gives little room for procrastination of actions.
Disaster Responses
Disaster responses include actions that embrace the following:
Search and rescue
First aid and emergency medical care
Evacuation
Evacuation centre management
Development of Standard Operation Procedure (SOPs)
Immediate repair of community facilities and services
Relief delivery
Coordination and Communication
Psycho-social counselling and stress debriefing
Medical services
contacting family/friends
Rehabilitation
Relief Aid
This relates to any provision of assistance during an emergency that is meant to attend to a person’s
immediate requirements for survival or recovery. It may include food, clothing, housing, medical
care, necessary social services and security when a person is faced with circumstances beyond her
or his control. Relief aid must be targeted at the most vulnerable first: Vulnerable children or
orphans, female or child headed households, pregnant or lactating women, sick or elderly
populations
of shelter
food supply
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx