Scenario Plaintiff(s) Defendants Duty Causation Damages Decision

1. Carloyns Motorist Carloyn To not to She removed Met with an Carloynsis

stop sign take the the stop sign accident and liable for the
stop sign got injured. negligence.
from the
intersection
2. Hot Passenger Restaurant To keep the Overheating Third degree The
Coffee coffee in of coffee to burns to 6% Restaurant is
such a 180 F of her body liable
temperature
which
should not
cause third
degree
burns.
3. Waxed Tenant Janitors No Negligence Injured The Janitors
Floor Apartments negligence on the side of Apartments
on the side plaintiff are not liable
of
apartment
because the
placed big
sign board
of caution
4. Lance’s Stefan’s Abby To not to Because of Heavily Abby is liable
Party drive after drunk and injured due for the act,
drinking. drive the car to accident
met with an
accident
5. Olivia & Olivia Roller Plaintiff is Due to Badly hurt Defendant is
the roller Coaster a detachment not liable
coaster wrongdoer. of safety bar
She on her she’s thrown
own will from the
detaches roller coaster
the safety
bars
Scenario Plaintiff(s) Defendants Duty Causation Damages Decision

7. Carrying Husband (Tribal State Of To provide Negligence Had to carry The

dead wife Man) Odisha Ambulance on the part wife on defendant is
to carry his of district shoulder for liable for the
dead wife hospital 12km said act
9. Chimp NGO (Animal State Of XYZ The Due to sleep Chimp got The
Escape Rights) authority dart he got badly authorities
would have restless and injured are liable for
taken down fell from the negligent act
chimp electric pole
without
hitting him
with sleep
dart
10. Man goes X (Driving bike Y (The X was Because of Brain dead Defendant
brain dead while using person driving this incident on spot were not
after accident phone) coming from negligently met with liable for the
other side) from wrong accident negligence
side while on the part
talking on of plaintiff
phone
11. Five year XYZ State of Y Negligence Boy fell into Died after Defendant is
old boy fell on the part the bore rescuing liable for the
into the bore of because the act
authorities bore
didn’t took because it
proper care was not
to cover the properly
bore covered
12.Gorakhpur Y State Of UP To provide Negligence Due to this Defendant is
Massacre proper on part of negligence liable
treatment to Hospital by many infant
infants in not died
ICU providing
proper ICU
treatment to
infants
Scenario Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s) Duty Causation Damages Decision

13.Illegal X (Victim) State of Tamil To see Due to the She died on The
Hoarding Nadu there is no falling spot defendant is
illegal down of liable
hoarding hoarding on
on the road
middle of plaintiff met
the road with an
accident
14. One fish X (Victim) Restaurant To make Negligence He had to The
two fish sure that on the part rush to defendant is
blowfish blue poisonous of restaurant hospital liable
fish wish was by giving
cooked fish cooked
properly by waiterto
theplaintiff
15.Paragliding Tourist Paragliding Co. To make The plaintiff Badly The
Negligence sure that on his own injured defendant is
the safety removed not liable
gear is one of the because
properly safety proper care
attached clamp and was taken
fellfrom from their
50ft part