Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 4 Testing in General
Chapter 4 Testing in General
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
4-5 4-6
1
11/17/2020
4-7 4-8
4. Tests Have Strengths and Weaknesses 5. Various Sources of Error are Part of Assessment
• Competent test users understand and appreciate Error refers to factors other than what a test
the limitations of the tests they use. attempts to measure
4-9 4-10
5. Various Sources of Error are Part of Assessment 6. Testing and Assessment can be Conducted in a Fair
Manner
• Both the assessee, assessor and the instrument are
sources of error variance • major test publishers strive to develop instruments
that are fair
4-11 4-12
2
11/17/2020
6. Testing and Assessment can be Conducted in a 7. Testing and Assessment Benefit Society
Fair Manner
• Problems arise • Considering the many areas of our lives that they
– if the test is used with people for whom it was not benefit, there is a great need for tests
intended. – Diagnosing educational difficulties
– Diagnosing neuropsychological impairments
– Hiring based on merit
4-13 4-14
• Validity: The test measures what it purports (intends) • A good test is a useful test that will ultimately
to measure. benefit individual test-takers or society at large.
4-15 4-16
Norms Norms
• Norms are the test performance data of a
• Guide smooth and peaceful interactions by defining
particular group of test-takers that are designed
predictable behavior in different situations.
for use as a reference when evaluating or
interpreting individual test scores.
• Norms tend to be institutionalized and
internalized.
• A normative sample is the reference group to
which test-takers are compared.
4-17 4-18
3
11/17/2020
4-19 4-20
Stratified-random sampling- Every member of the • Best used with a sample population easily broken into
distinct subgroups.
population has an equal opportunity of being
included in a sample.
• Samples are then randomly taken from each subgroup
based on the ratio of the subgroup’s size to the total data
population.
4-21 4-22
• Suppose that in a company there are the following staff: • male, full-time = 90 ÷ 180 = 50 %
• male, full-time : 90 • male, part-time = 18 ÷ 180 = 10 %
• male, part-time : 18 • female, full-time = 9 ÷ 180 = 5%
• female, full-time : 9 • female, part-time = 63 ÷ 180 = 35%
• female, part-time : 63
• Total : 180 This tells us that of our sample of 40,
• 50 % of 40 is 20 (male, full-time)
take a sample of 40 staff, stratified according to the • 10 % of 40 is 4 (male, part-time)
above categories. • 5 % of 40 is 2 (female, full- time)
• 35% of 40 is 14 (female, part-time)
4-23 4-24
4
11/17/2020
• To perform stratified random sampling with 200 pieces of Incidental/convenience sample - A sample that is
the data, convenient or available for use which may not be
• 45% of the sample must come from A, 90
representative of the population.
• 25% must come from B, 50
• 20% must come from C 40
• 10% must come from D. 20
• Total 200
4-25 4-26
4-27 4-28
• The ranking is out of a hundred and the percentile • The problem is that real differences between raw
reports where the person would fall if ranked against scores may be minimized near the ends of the
100 others. distribution and exaggerated in the middle of the
– 30th percentile they are as good as 30 out of 100 distribution.
– 70th percentile they are better than 70 out of 100
4-29 4-30
5
11/17/2020
4-31 4-32
Types of Norms
4-33 4-34
4-35 4-36
6
11/17/2020
4-37 4-38
4-39 4-40
4-41