The document shows two tables that track hypothetical trades over 84 periods. Each trade has a 40% chance of a winning trade or 20% chance of a losing trade. The tables track the running balance, lot size, pips, and profit/loss for each trade. After 84 periods, the balance in the first table ended at $11,672.31 while the second table ended with a higher balance of $25,533.19, demonstrating that random outcomes can result in different ending balances despite having the same trading parameters.
The document shows two tables that track hypothetical trades over 84 periods. Each trade has a 40% chance of a winning trade or 20% chance of a losing trade. The tables track the running balance, lot size, pips, and profit/loss for each trade. After 84 periods, the balance in the first table ended at $11,672.31 while the second table ended with a higher balance of $25,533.19, demonstrating that random outcomes can result in different ending balances despite having the same trading parameters.
The document shows two tables that track hypothetical trades over 84 periods. Each trade has a 40% chance of a winning trade or 20% chance of a losing trade. The tables track the running balance, lot size, pips, and profit/loss for each trade. After 84 periods, the balance in the first table ended at $11,672.31 while the second table ended with a higher balance of $25,533.19, demonstrating that random outcomes can result in different ending balances despite having the same trading parameters.
The document shows two tables that track hypothetical trades over 84 periods. Each trade has a 40% chance of a winning trade or 20% chance of a losing trade. The tables track the running balance, lot size, pips, and profit/loss for each trade. After 84 periods, the balance in the first table ended at $11,672.31 while the second table ended with a higher balance of $25,533.19, demonstrating that random outcomes can result in different ending balances despite having the same trading parameters.