This book provides an overview of Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience, or satyagraha, as a method for resolving conflicts. It explains that satyagraha involves recognizing truths in opposing perspectives, combining those truths to form a new shared position, and persisting in non-violent struggle until all sides agree. The book also presents case studies of satyagraha in action, such as resolving a dispute between workers and management, and achieving peace in Northern Ireland. Finally, it contrasts Gandhi's views with other thinkers like Marx and Freud on topics like the role of violence in history and the nature of anger.
This book provides an overview of Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience, or satyagraha, as a method for resolving conflicts. It explains that satyagraha involves recognizing truths in opposing perspectives, combining those truths to form a new shared position, and persisting in non-violent struggle until all sides agree. The book also presents case studies of satyagraha in action, such as resolving a dispute between workers and management, and achieving peace in Northern Ireland. Finally, it contrasts Gandhi's views with other thinkers like Marx and Freud on topics like the role of violence in history and the nature of anger.
This book provides an overview of Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience, or satyagraha, as a method for resolving conflicts. It explains that satyagraha involves recognizing truths in opposing perspectives, combining those truths to form a new shared position, and persisting in non-violent struggle until all sides agree. The book also presents case studies of satyagraha in action, such as resolving a dispute between workers and management, and achieving peace in Northern Ireland. Finally, it contrasts Gandhi's views with other thinkers like Marx and Freud on topics like the role of violence in history and the nature of anger.
This book provides an overview of Mahatma Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent civil disobedience, or satyagraha, as a method for resolving conflicts. It explains that satyagraha involves recognizing truths in opposing perspectives, combining those truths to form a new shared position, and persisting in non-violent struggle until all sides agree. The book also presents case studies of satyagraha in action, such as resolving a dispute between workers and management, and achieving peace in Northern Ireland. Finally, it contrasts Gandhi's views with other thinkers like Marx and Freud on topics like the role of violence in history and the nature of anger.
A Handbook of Conflict Resolution, Updated with a New Preface and New Case Study by Mark Jurgensmeyer
Mahatma Gandhi, or Mohandas
Karamchand Gandhi. Born on October 2, 1869, in Porbandar, India, and died on January 30, 1948, in Delhi. He was an Indian lawyer, interested in politics, and a social activist who became the figurehead of the Indian independence movement against the British colony. Gandhi is universally known for his teaching of non-violence resistance notion also known as “Satyagraha.” In the first section of the book, the writer explains the basic idea of Gandhian method in solving conflicts in what it is like to be called” SATYAGRAHA” or "the truth force.” The word satyagraha itself is a combination of two words:” Satya” which means the truth, and” Agraha” which means clinging or holding on to. In other words, it means holding on to the truth. According to Gandhi: SATYAGRAHA is the idea of solving struggles and conflicts with no violence and no force using only persuading following these steps: recognizing the truthful and untruthful elements in each side, putting the truthful elements from each side together, forming a new side and adopting it while struggling with your opponent, then ending the struggle only when both sides agree to occupy the same side. The second section of the book shows a lot of case study examples; for instance, the first case study was about endangered employees in which the struggle was the effect that an organizational change will have on employees; it ended with the agreement of the owner to let the workers restructure the place wanted by the owner. Moreover, the second one was about the political future of Northern Ireland concerning the Catholics and the protestants to determine the political and religious identity of the country; it ended in a peaceful way thanks to the Good Friday agreement, which established an end to the Irish terrorism, and protected both opponent's interests. The closing section of the book puts in contrast both Gandhi and other thinkers and scholars by putting them to the test in answering some issues such as: the first issue was “Can violence ever be justified? “, in which Gandhi was disagreeing with the famous economist Karl Marx who defends violence as the engine of history; in other meaning, to continue the cycle of history, violence should be involved whereas Gandhi defends the idea of non-violence as the key to all the problems. In addition, the second issue was “Can anger be true? “, which is where Gandhi challenges the famous psychologist Sigmund Freud who supports the idea that anger is like any feeling or emotion when in fact Gandhi upholds to the non-violence idea since the feeling of anger leads to violence.