Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Air Permeability As A Function of SPE-10922-Thomeer
Air Permeability As A Function of SPE-10922-Thomeer
Summary
A new relationship between air permeability and three S boo = percent bulk volume occupied by mercury
parameters describing a pore network is presented. The at infinite capillary pressure, or total in-
parameters are normally derived from the mercury/air terconnected PV.
capillary-pressure curve but may also be approximated
from a petrographic analysis of thin sections. Methods to determine the values of these parameters
for a capillary-pressure curve are given in the referenced
Introduction 1960 paper. I
In 1960 Thomeer l showed that mercury/air capillary- Thomeer also evaluated both the significance and ac-
pressure curves form a family. Each curve can be curacy of determination of these parameters. Values
uniquely defined by specific values of three parameters were determined from capillary-pressure curves on 144
of the equation that describe the family. The following diverse rock samples and correlated with air
relationship between capillary pressure (Pc) and bulk permeabilities measured on the same samples. This cor-
volume occupied by mercury (Sb) was proposed: relation showed a good relationship between air
Sb _ -Fg /(logPc1pd )
permeability and the parameters. In this paper, we pro-
--e .................... (1) pose improvements and refinements of this relationship
Sboo and also suggest a method for estimating air permeability
from a petrographic rock description. This method
This equation describes a hyperbola when plotted on log- employs conversion of petrographic observations into
log paper. The values of P d and S boo determine the loca- equivalent capillary curve parameters.
tion of its asymptotes, and the value of F g defines its
shape. The Data Set
An individual capillary-pressure curve is uniquely Laboratory-measured porosities, air permeabilities, and
defined by specific values of the following three mercury/air capillary-pressure curves on 279 rock
parameters. samples were used. The samples were obtained from
reservoirs in about 54 fields and consisted of 165
Fg pore geometrical factor, reflecting the
= siliciclastics and 114 carbonates. All three laboratory
distribution of pore throats and their measurements were performed on the same piece of
associated PV; rock. Air permeabilities represent roufine measure-
Pd = mercury/air extrapolated displacement ments-i.e., they were not corrected for the Klinkenberg
pressure, indicating the pressure required effect. For each capillary curve, the parameters F g , P d,
for mercury to enter the largest pore and Sboo were determined using the overlay procedure. I
throat, psia (kPa); and Figs. 1 through 3 show the distribution of porosities,
air permeabilities, and pore geometrical factors for the
0149-213618310041-0922$00.25
279 samples separately for the total set, the carbonates,
Copyright 1983 Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME and the siliciclastics. This sample set provides good
APRIL 1983 809
a a
60
60 SANDSTONES
SANDSTONES
40 (165 SAMPl ESJ
40 1165 SAMPLES)
20
20
40
b CARBONATES
b CARBONATES
1114 SAMPLES)
20 j114SAMPLESJ 20
(279 SAMPLES)
c 1279 SAMPLES)
60 60
40 40
20 20
~7~7~~~ii
- ~;! ~!ii i!l j;! III if
POROSITY (%) PORE GEOMETRICAL FACTOR - Fg
Fig. 1-Porosity distribution of the sample set. Fig. 3-Pore geometrical factor distribution of the sample
set.
Statistical Procedures
Correlations were attempted with several statistical
40
SANDSTONES
models. The best correlation coefficients were obtained
(165 SAMPLES) when the power-curve regression model was used. This
20 model has the equation
{114$AMPLES}
20
In this paper b is the "constant" and a is the "expo-
nent. " Since both x and y values in our data contain er-
rors, reduced regression was used exclusively. Thus, the
60
c values for the root mean square (RMS) of the deviations,
SANDSTONES AND CAABOI'JATES
(279 SAMPLES)
s, the correlation coefficient, K, the exponent, a, and the
40 constant, b, reflect those of the reduced regression equa-
tion. Furthermore, since Eq. 2 was linearized for regres-
20 sion purposes, the RMS of deviations, s, should be inter-
preted as follows.
k true
- - <kest <s·k true ·
s
AIR PERMEABILITY Imd)
The RMS of deviations to be interpreted this way are
Fig. 2-Air permeability distribution of the sample set. denoted by a "times" sign following the numerical
value of s; for example: s= 1.50 X.
810 JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
TABLE 1-RESULTS OF REGRESSION OF k a and (S boo/P d)
FOR INDIVIDUAL VALUES OF F g
b'
~ N K b s a (for a=2.0)
0.05 3
0.06 2
0.08 8 0.956 110.45 1.31 x 2.054 113.66
0.1 42 0.984 68.62 1.52x 2.020 68.70
0.15 10 0.925 51.86 1.59x 2.086 52.94
0.16 3
0.2 71 0.979 36.49 1.53x 1.970 36.57
0.25 4
0.3 66 0.941 19.71 1.99x 2.018 19.58
0.4 23 0.947 13.29 1.99x 1.992 13.34
0.5 22 0.922 7.92 2.14x 1.921 8.02
0.6 7 0.875 7.17 2.04x 2.123 7.20
0.7 7 0.957 4.89 1.91 x 2.332 5.56
0.8 4
0.9 3
1.0 4
I
count for differences between the pore geometry of his ...
>
:::;
model and that of natural rocks. Comparison of Purcell's
~w
relationship to emfirical Eq. 3 suggests that C should be :IE
a:
related to (acos8) , F g, and some constant C'. Since the ...a:
w
Largest
Porosity' q, Pore Throat Diameter Equivalent P d Calculated k a
(%) Fg (microns) (psia) (md)
20 0.1 1 214.0 0.7
20 0.1 5 42.8 17.9
20 0.1 20 10.7 286.6
20 0.3 1 214.0 0.2
20 0.3 5 42.8 4.1
20 0.3 20 10.7 66.2
• Assumed that 1> = S boo .
b'=3.5212 Fg -1.3764, K= -1.00, s= 1.11 x .... (6) When plotted on log-log paper, the slope of Eq. 9 equals
45°23'48". In view of its slightly lower b-value and in-
creased exponent (or slope) when compared with Eq. 8,
Eqs. 5 and 6 are quite similar, with excellent correla- selecting Eq. 5 to establish Eq. 7 is justified.
tion coefficients. Eq. 5 was selected primarily because In conclusion, we have developed a relationship be-
the input data should be weighted. Later we see that air tween air permeability and the parameters F g' P d, and
permeabilities calculated with a relationship incor- S boo. This equation is an improvement over the original
porating Eq. 5 matches measured values slightly better equation developed in 1960.
than those using Eq. 6.
Having established a relationship between b '- and Fg- A Comment on Porosity-Permeability
values, Eqs. 4 and 5 may now be combined. This results Relationships
in the following relationship, which expresses aIr The relationship (Eq. 7) between air permeability and
permeability as a function of F g , P d, and S boo . three basic parameters of the pore network should ex-
plain why permeability vs. porosity crossplots often fail
ka =3.8068 Fg -1.3334(Sboo/Pd)2.0 . ........... (7) to yield more than a "shotgun" pattern. For a given
812 JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY
TABLE 3-CONVERTING PETROGRAPHIC DATA INTO EQUIVALENT VOLUME AND PRESSURE DATA
Petrographic Description
Pore Throat Percent of Cumulative Percent
Percent of Diameter Total Bulk of Total Equivalent
Total Throats (microns) Volume Bulk Volume Pc (psia)
5 <1 1.0 18.2 to 19.3 >214
10 1 to 5 1.9 16.4 to 18.3 42.8 to 214
35 5 to 10 6.75 9.65 to 16.4 21.4 to 42.8
35 10 to 15 6.75 2.9 to 9.65 14.3 to 21.4
15 15 to 25 2.9 0 to 2.9 8.6 to 14.3
100 </>=19.3%
g: 60
Estimation of Air Permeability
~
>
c::
:5 > AVERAGE
From Petrographic Information ~ 40
Fg 1035)
~.
~u
The growing interest and need to obtain maximum infor- c::
;;:
mation from small rock samples such as drill cuttings has )::
---............--
c::
led to improved techniques 3 for obtaining capillary " 20
u
c::
curves and thus, indirectly, permeability on small
samples. Another potential means to obtain a permeabili-
ty estimate from small samples is petrographic analysis
"
...
~
'"
> 10
:; 8
employing thin sections supplemented perhaps by scan- i1
ning electron microscope photographs. In our approach, 6