Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rutendo Sdls Ass
Rutendo Sdls Ass
NAME: RUTENDO
REG NUMBER:
PROGRAM:
FACULTY: SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
MODULE:
1
Alexander Astin's theory of Student Involvement is one of the famous theories that
explain student’s development but, profoundly, his theory explains how desirable
outcomes for institutions of higher education are viewed in relation to how students
change and develop as a result of being involved co-curricular activities at the
institution of higher learning. This question calls for a discussion of key assumptions
of Astin’s theory of student involvement that was propounded in 1984 on
development of students’ life skills through involvement in programmed activities on
the campus as highlighted earlier on. The main assumptions of the theory are
composed of three elements. The first one is student's "inputs" such as their
background, and any previous experiences. Secondly, the student's "environment",
which accounts for all of the experiences a student would have during college. Lastly,
the "outcomes" which cover a student's characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, beliefs,
and values that exist after a student has graduated college from that institution of
higher learning.
This essay is going to highlight on Astin’s five basic assumptions in line with the
student development through involvement. Student involvement refers to the
investment of physical and psychological energy towards her development of life
skills. Astin’s five basic assumptions about involvement are students’ involvement
requires an investment of psycho-social and physical energy. Secondly, Involvement
is continuous, and that the amount of energy invested varies from student to
student. Thirdly, aspects of involvement may be qualitative and quantitative. Fourthly,
the question what a student gains from being involved (or their development) is
directly proportional to the extent to which they were involved (in both aspects of
quality and quantity). Lastly, academic performance is correlated with the student
involvement.
Defining key terms is necessary as far as this question is concerned. Collegiate refers
to activities related to college. Programmed activities at the university are many such
as debates, presentations, talk-shows and outdoor or extra-curricular activities such as
sports at playgrounds. All these programmed activities have a bearing in promoting
the development of life skills. Life skills are just skills required and mostly acquired
by students at the university to participate as organized humans in everyday life such
2
as communication skills, decision making, critical thinking and problem-solving
among others. Some will be unpacked as the assay progresses.
To commence with his first assumption of the theory in question, He argue that
involvement is continuous, and that the amount of energy invested varies from student
to student. This assumption seems to hold water as constant repetition of the same
thing boost knowledge on that particular thing. In line with the above question,
students have to engage themselves with such activities in a bid to develop their life-
skills. Activities like debates are very important since students grasp many concepts
of life and also learn critical life-skills. During the journey from primary to secondary
school even here at University of Zimbabwe, I have seen that many students have low
self-esteem, poor communication skills, poor levels of critical thinking. I have the
audacity to highlight Williams Perry from my previous assignment where he talked
about dualism where there are two answers to questions “yes” and “no” and students
rely more on authorities without questioning them critically. Like mentioned above,
Astin’s first assumption holds more water. The amount of both physical and
psychological energy a student channel towards these activities determines the
outcome after graduation. The more the student keep on involved in debates boosts
his communication skills, confidence, problem and critical thinking on how to solve
problems faced by communities. On this assumption, he argue that, the energies
mentioned above differ or vary from student to student that is the reason why some
proceed to greater heights than others. Sometimes, it is because of the attitude towards
such programmed activities as mentioned in the book Maxwell 101 where he unpacks
the importance of attitude in line with success.
3
towards students’ involvement in economic resuscitation and building to make
Zimbabwe a middle-class by 2030. During the course of her community service, she
invested large amounts of energy and got a lot of life-skills such as communication
skills, respect for the authority, problem-solving skills among others.
Thirdly, he questions what the student gains from being involved (or their
development) is directly proportional to the extent to which they were involved (in
both aspects of quality and quantity). This assumption is in support with the previous
one. The outcome is directly proportional to the energy that a student invested during
the involvement with the programmed activities at the university. The one that does
not get involve and not consistent in getting involved in such activities will reap bad
outcome and most students face challenges in industry after graduation because those
life-skills are panacea in life and creating a better world. Sports at the university helps
people networking, knowing each other, helping each other in future. It is only
possible when a student invest more in such activities.
4
with life skills such as negotiating and refusal skills, leadership skills they will
definitely use after graduation. President of the main opposition party Citizen’s
Coalition for Change Nelson Chamisa got some of the skills when he was a leader of
ZINASU at the University of Zimbabwe. There is correlation between involvement
and academic performance.
5
References