SKM C45822102617060

You might also like

Download as pdf
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 6
Al 3 Training Evaluation Document Reference AAEM- Revision Number 4 Revision Date 27-Dec-2018 Staff No 43412 Employee Name Mohiddin Kamruddin Grade Designation Electrician Business Unit EMW Department MEP Training course Fire Fighter Date 06.12.2021 Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Training Feedback Form. Your feedback is an essential contribution to our continual improvement and would help us improve our training, Please respond to the survey by placing an X in the appropriate box. Soir a ree |Overall training feedback was satisfactory a General [Training objectives were clearly stated and achieved | |Training schedule was identified and followed wr [Training contents were interesting and beneficial Fa Content [Training content was sequenced Systematically oO [Training Duration was appropriate a [Training Room was Suitable za Course lumber of participants were adequate a Setting [Training Materials were useful a Presentation style was engaging and well explanatory | [Trainee's concerns were respected and suitably Trainers addressed — Delivery -| [Trainers knowledgeable on the topic was satisfactory | [Adequate time was provided for questions & discussion) —|_—~ Relevance to [Acquired knowledges relevant and willbe applied for | | the Job _|the future development in the task What aspects of the training could be improved? Would you recommend this course to other employees in the company? Who? Why? Trainee Training Evaluation Document Reference AAEM-P-03/F04 Revision Number 4 Staff No 42075 Employee Name Designation Asst. Electrician Business Unit Training course Fire Fighter Revision Date 27-Dec-2018 Mohammed Aziz Grade EMw Department ep Date 06.12.2021 Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Training Feedback Form. Your feedback is an essential contribution to our continual improvement and would help us improve our training. Please respond to the survey by placing an X in the appropriate box. Sr pa Sold Gey Tattcl er Dea (Overall training feedback was satisfactory General _|Training objectives were clearly stated and achieved — ITraining schedule was identified and followed Pa [Training contents were interesting and beneficial ra Content _ [Training content was sequenced Systematically Za ITraining Duration was appropriate a [Training Room was Suitable a Course lumber of participants were adequate — Setting [Training Materials were useful a I Presentation style was engaging and well explanatory 4 ITrainee's concerns were respected and suitably Trainers addressed _ Delivery Trainers knowledgeable on the topic was satisfactory | __-—~ JAdequate time was provided for questions & discussion] ~~~ Relevance to [Acquired knowledge is relevant and will be applied for the Job _|the future development in the task | What aspects of the training could be improved? Would you recommend this course to other employees in the company? Who? Why? Trainee AZZ Al Training Evaluation Document Reference AAEM-P-03/FO4 Revision Date 27-Dec-2018 Revision Number 4 Staff No 43027 Employee Name Dilwar Al Grade Designation Asst. Plumber Business Unit EMw Department MEP Training course Fire Warden Date 06.12.2021 Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Training Feedback Form. Your feedback is an essential contribution to our continual improvement and would help us improve our training. Please respond to the survey by placing an X in the appropriate box. Brg Ee er aed agree eee [overall training feedback was satisfactory General _ [Training objectives were clearly stated and achieved [Training schedule was identified and followed [Training contents were interesting and benefi Content [Training content was sequenced Systematically [Training Duration was appropriate [Training Room was Suitable Course Setting [Number of participants were adequate [Training Materials were useful Presentation style was engaging and well explanatory [Trainee's concerns were respected and suitably Trainers addressed Delivery — Hrrainers knowledgeable on the topic was satisfactory |Adequate time was provided for questions & discussion! VA AAAR AYA \ Relevance to [Acquired knowledge is relevant and the Job {the future development in the task be applied for What aspects of the training could be improved? Would you recommend this course to other employees in the company? Who? Why? Trainee Signature = ay = hes P 4 Al sy Training Evaluation Document Reference AAEM-P-03/FO4 Revision Date 27-Dec-2018 in Number 4 Staff No Employee Name UsmanGani Jakirbhai Grade Designation Office Assistant Business Unit EMW Department MEP Training course Fire Warden Date 06.12.2021 ‘Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Training Feedback Form. Your feedback is an essential contribution to our continual improvement and would help us improve our training. Please respond to the survey by placing an X in the appropriate box. Bory Soy ae cn ct rer ena agree fees [Overall training feedback was satisfactory General _|Training objectives were clearly stated and achieved SO [Training schedule was identified and followed ee Training contents were interesting and beneficial a Content {Training content was sequenced Systematically a [Training Duration was appropriate a ‘Training Room was Suitable 7 Course |njumber of participants were adequate a Setting (Training Materials were useful — Presentation style was engaging and well explanatory | (Trainee's concerns were respected and suitably a addressed |Trainers knowledgeable on the topic was satisfactory a [Adequate time was provided for questions & discussion] ~~ | Relevance to |Acquired knowledge is relevant and will be applied for | theJob _|the future development in the task What aspects of the training could be improved? Would you recommend this course to other employees in the company? Who? Why? Trainee Signature Al Training Evaluation set wie Document Reference AAEM-P-03/F04 Revision Date 27-Dec-2018 Revision Number 4 Staff No 41149 Employee Name Mohamed Riyas Grade 7 Designation QA/QC Engineer Business Unit emw Department MEP Training course Fire Fighter Date 06.12.2021 ‘Thank you for taking the time to fil out our Training Feedback Form. Your feedback is an essential contribution to our continual improvement and would help us improve our training. Please respond to the survey by placing an X in the appropriate box. Sor Er Cac Eas Ciey lOverall training feedback was satisfactory General _ {Training objectives were clearly stated and achieved [Training schedule was identified and followed \N\\ [Training contents were interesting and beneficial \ Content _ {Training content was sequenced Systematically ITraining Duration was appropriate [Training Room was Suitable Course Setting \ Number of participants were adequate [Training Materials were useful \A Presentation style was engaging and well explanatory |Trainee's concerns were respected and suitably Trainers addressed Delivery ITrainers knowledgeable on the topic was satisfactory |Adequate time was provided for questions & discussion Relevance to [Acquired knowledge is relevant and will be applied for the Job __|the future development in the task \I\\\ What aspects of the training could be improved? Would you recommend this course to other employees in the company? Who? Why? Trainee Signature , Training Evaluation Document Reference AAEM-P-03/F04 Re Revision Number 4 ision Date 27-Dec-2018 Staff No 42630 Employee Name Samee Ullah Grade 7 Designation Safety Officer Business Unit EMW Department MEP Training course Emergency Fist Aid Date 31.08.2022 Thank you for taking the time to fill out our Training Feedback Form. Your feedback is an essential contribution to our continual improvement and would help us improve our training. Please respond to the survey by placing an X in the appropriate box. Bry pa ten aero Pec [Overall training feedback was satisfactory General {Training objectives were clearly stated and achieved ws Training schedule was identified and followed _ Training contents were interesting and beneficial Pa Content [Training content was sequenced Systematically a [Training Duration was appropriate eA [Training Room was Suitable ~~ Course Sorting [Number of participants were adequate 4 [Training Materials were useful Ao Presentation style was engaging and well explanatory ITrainee's concerns were respected and suitably 4 Trainers addressed “YY Delivery lrrainers knowledgeable on the topic was satisfactory |. |Adequate time was provided for questions & discussion| ww Relevance to |Acquired knowledge is relevant and will be applied for | the Job —_|the future development in the task ‘What aspects of the training could be improved? Would you recommend this course to other employees in the company? Who? Why? Yer from Eby Team Lesolot (Fens) Trainee Signature OAD Pes

You might also like