Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nemani 2016
Nemani 2016
Nemani 2016
A
DOI 10.1007/s40030-016-0175-x
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Testing procedure
Fig. 1 a Test arrangement for punching shear load of SS slabs. b Test
The two way slab specimens were subjected to punching shear arrangement for punching shear load of fixed slabs
load by a in house fabricated apparatus under a typical loading
frame. The punching shear load was applied with help of a
hydraulic jack of capacity along with 400 kN. The punching punching shear effect on the concrete slab specimens. The
shear load was gradually applied to the slab specimens. The central deflections were recorded continuously till the
central deflections were recorded during loading continuously specimen reaches ultimate load at failure (Figs. 2, 3).
till the specimens reaches ultimate load (i.e., up to failure).
The cracking pattern of each slab specimens were also
observed and marked in ink for clear visibility. Discussions of test results
The slab specimens of both categories i.e., simply sup-
ported and fixed were tested using typical loading frame for The investigation results shows that, the load carrying
punching shear. The details of the loading arrangement are capacity of SG20 two way simply supported category slab
shown in Fig. 1a, b. A deflectometer with a least count category specimens were increased 21 % under punching
0.01 mm was placed at the center of bottom face of the slab shear load when compared with S0 category as shown in
specimen to record the deflections. The punching shear load Table 5. In fixed slab category specimens the load carrying
was applied to simulate a column-footing arrangement. For capacity were increased 17.5 % under punching shear load
this a plate of 200 9 200 9 12 mm iron plate resembles like when compared with conventional concrete slab specimens
a footing and 65 mm/solid steelrod resembles like Column as shown in Table 6. The experimental punching loads
over footing. An arrangement was made to apply load with higher in simply supported slab case compared with ACI
help of a hydraulic jack of capacity 400 kN. The punching and IS methods. The experimental punching load is
shear load was gradually applied on the slab specimens along increased 16.67 % in S G30 category slab specimen when
the above arrangement. The total arrangement exhibits the compared with S0 category. This may be due to the
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
150 122.65
110 118.31
104.4 97.36 99.8 100.56
93.8 ExperimentalPunching Load
100 72.38 75.21 76.99 77.59
(kN)
50 ACI (kN)
0
F0 F G 10 F G20 F G30 IS (kN)
Nomenclature of slab specimen
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
Ettringite and C–S–H crystals, expansive destruction from Ks ¼ ð0:5 þ b0 Þ 1b0 = the ratio of short side to long
hydration products result in looser structure and micro side of column
cracks. The Fig. 5 with addition of mineral admixtures like suc = shear stress in concrete, N/mm2
GGBS composition of ITZ (Interfacial Transition Zone) fck = characteristic compressive strength of concrete,
changes. Specifically, compacting hydration product C–S– N/mm2
H gel forms and content of Ca(OH)2 decreases due to u = length of the perimeter (mm), taken at a distance of
d
pozzolanic effect. Additionally, microstructure becomes 2 from the column or pedestal
denser and micro-cracks decrease, connection between d = effective depth at the critical section, mm
paste and aggregate is enhanced due to this interlocking
capacity will increased, friction between particles will As per ACI 318-2005
decreased, so this effect offers increment in compressive
strength of concrete. Once compressive strength increased 1st equation:
the ultimate punching shear strength also increases.
0:332 pffiffiffiffi
From MIP (Micro-Morphology Interfacial Transition Pu ¼ 0:166 þ fc u d
Bc
Zone), SEM (Scanned Electronic Microscopic) photographs
shows the mechanical performance indicate that pore size where,
distribution has obvious effect on compressive strength of 1000
concrete and macro-properties of concrete material are closely Bc ¼ ¼1
1000
related to its microstructure. This also increase the compres-
0:332 pffiffiffiffi
sive strength of concrete and later on durability aspects. )Pu ¼ 0:166 þ fc u d
1
pffiffiffiffi
Ultimate Punching Shear Load Calculation Pu ¼ ð0:498Þ fc u d
as per ACI and is Methods (Model Calculation)
2nd equation:
The calculation procedure of ultimate punching shear load d pffiffiffiffi
as per ASI and IS methods has been shown below. Pu ¼ 0:166 þ 0:083 a fc u d
u
As per ACI 318-2005 code the ultimate punching shear
6
strength Pu is taken as the smallest value given by the Effective depth ðdÞ ¼ 65 15 247 ¼ 47 47 mm) a = 40
following: for symmetric punchingu = 200 þ 2 þ 2 4 ¼ 988 mm)
(The size of plate under punching rod = 200 9 200 mm)
0:332 pffiffiffiffi
Pu ¼ 0:166 þ fc u d ð1Þ 47 pffiffiffiffi
Bc Pu ¼ 0:166 þ 0:083ð40Þ fc u d
988
d pffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffi
Pu ¼ 0:166 þ 0:083 a fc u ð2Þ )Pu ¼ 0:324 fc u d
u
pffiffiffiffi
Pu ¼ 0:332 þ fc u d ð3Þ 3rd equation:
pffiffiffiffi
Pu ¼ 0:332 fc u d
where,
Pu = ultimate punching shear strength, N So adopt the least or smallest value of the above three
pffiffiffiffi
Bc = The ratio of long side to short side of the loaded equations i.e., Pu ¼ 0:324 fc u d
area Model calculation: as per ACI 318-2005
Fc = specified compressive strength of concrete, N/ fck = 38.88 N/mm2 (characteristic strength of M30
mm2a = 40 for symmetric perimeter, mm taken at a dis- grade concrete obtained, is used in our slab casting)Ulti-
pffiffiffiffi
tance of d2 from the column or pedestal mate ppunching
ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi shear strength = Pu ¼ 0:324 fc u d ¼
d = effective depth of the slab, mm 0:324 38:88ð988Þð47Þ ¼ 93; 812:95 N ð93:813 kN)
As per IS: 456-2000, the expression for calculating the Model calculation: as per IS: 456-2000
punching shear strength Pu by considering partial safety Ultimate punching shear strength ¼ Pu ¼ Ks suc u d
factor for the material as unity is given by where,
Pu ¼ Ks suc u d ð4Þ Ks ¼ ð0:5 þ b0 Þ 1
where, 1000
b0 ¼ ¼1
Pu = ultimate punching shear strength, N 1000
123
J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A
)Ks ¼ ð0:5 þ 1Þ ¼ 1:5 [ 1ðSo Ks ¼ 1Þ 2. V. Awasare, M.V. Nagendra, Analysis of strength characteristics
pffiffiffiffiffi pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi of GGBS concrete. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. V(II), 82–84 (2014)
suc ¼ shear stress ¼ 0:25 fck ¼ 0:25 38:88 3. A.H.L. Swaroop, K. Venkateswararao, P. Kodandaramarao,
¼ 1:558 N/mm2 Durability studies on concrete with fly ash & Ggbs. Int. J. Eng.
Res. Appl. 3(4), 285–289 (2013)
u = 988 mm and d = 47 mm 4. K.V. Pratap, M. Bhasker, P.S.S.R. Teja, Triple blending of
cement concrete with fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace
1 1:558 988 47 slag. IJEAR. 4(Spl-2), 54–58 (2014)
Pu ¼ ¼ 72; 386:56 ð72:386Þ kN 5. Y.O. Patil, P.N. Patil, D. Arun Kumar, GGBS as partial
103
replacement of OPC in cement concrete – An experimental study.
Int. J. Sci. Res. 24(11), 189–191
Conclusion 6. H. Sudarsana Rao, N.V. Ramana, K. Gnaneswar, Behaviour of
restrained SIFCON two way slabs Part-2: punching shear. Asian
J. Civ. Eng. (Build. Hous.) 10(4), 481–494 (2009)
• When cement was replaced with 20 % of GGBS, then 7. N. Venkata Ramana, C. Sashidhar, K. Gnaneswar, T. Naresh
the punching shear load capacity increases to 21 % Kumar, Behaviour of high performance concrete two way slas in
when compared with normal concrete for simply sup- punching shear. Int. J. Sci. Adv. Technol. 2(3), 122–124 (2012)
8. S.H. Kim, C. Gao, I.S. Kag, H.S. Lee, K.J. Lee, K.K. Lee,
ported slab edge condition as shown in Fig. 2. Punching shear of I-slab with polystyrene void forms. The 14th
• The cement can be replaced with GGBS of 30 % the World Conference on earthquake Engineering, October 12–17,
punching shear load capacity increases to 17.5 % when Beijing, China, pp. 1–4 (2008)
compared with normal concrete for fixed edge condi- 9. A.S. Farghaly, T. Ueda, Punching strength of two way slabs
strengthened externally with CFRP sheets, Technical paper,
tion as shown in Fig. 3. pp. 1–6 (2009)
• The experimental punching shear load carrying capac- 10. A. Muttoni, Punchimg shear strength of reinforced concrete slabs
ity was increased compared with ACI, IS methods. without transverse reinforcement, ACI Struct. J. 105(4), 440–450
(2008)
11. C.N.S. Kumar, T.D.G. Rao, Punching shear resistance of concrete
slabs using mode—II fracture energy. Eng. Fract. Mech. 83,
75–85 (2012)
References
123