Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BBBY S Case
BBBY S Case
BBBY S Case
Executive summary
Maximize the MV equity considering the tax shields effects and the bank-
ruptcy risks increasing the return on equity for the shareholders.
Secure the future commitment of cash of the company, and
The sign to the capital markets about this new capital structure.
2. Company performance
Bed, Bath and Beyond is competing in the retail industry in USA with net sales
of $4.5 billion and a net income of $399 million for Fiscal year 2003. It is one of
the top-performing public companies. This success could be attributed to the
following factors:
Classification: Confidential
Page 2 of 4
The company is the largest superstore domestic retailer, although its market
share was estimated at 4 percent. Their competitors are department stores,
mass merchandisers, superstore competitors and specialty stores. The compa-
rable data of the industry present a 5-yr-CAGR between -9.8% and 28.5%.
Bed, Bath and Beyond present the highest 5-yr-CAGR and with that growth
maintain their 4% percent participation of the market. The EBIT margin of the
company is also the highest as a result of their strategy of low-cost structure
and high margins in their products, especially with their own brand. So, in this
competitive market the strategy decision for differentiation in products and ser-
vices has generated these high-performance return indicators. These phenome-
nal financial results have created an excess of cash in the company.
The shareholders have the second highest return on stock of the industry, but
the cash of the company is not generating the returns that should be, and some
market analysts are looking this as a risk of the company, because the money
could be less productive. Another point is that the company hasn’t paid divi-
dends since going public, so the market could read this as an inefficient sign of
the managers as they keep non debt and is much less than their competitors
that gain some advantage with debt in their capital structure.
Classification: Confidential
Page 3 of 4
age capital structure than their competitors and even their acquisitions were
made in cash. Is important that the company maintains their competitive ad-
vantage as well as being efficient in the use of the cash to maximize the wealth
of their shareholders.
The advantage of debt in the real world is that creates tax shields that increase
the shareholders returns, specially with low interest rates in the debt market
and growing opportunities in the retail segment and the current financial posi-
tion of the company provides a good opportunity to increase debt. In the other
hand an increase in debt of the company will affect their credit rating. The opti-
mal capital structure should be that the company increase debt until de value is
maximized between the difference of tax benefits and the bankruptcy costs.
In this case, the scenarios present the different market value equity for D/E ra-
tios shown in table 1.
The D/E that maximize the market value equity is 40%. This result is generated
by the combination of tax benefits and bankruptcy costs. The tax shield for ever
scenario is going up when the D/E ratio increase, but it also increases the aver-
Classification: Confidential
Page 4 of 4
age default rate of the company because of the higher long-term debt / capital
ratio.
In the 40% D/E ratio, the company will be taking debt of $636 million and a to-
tal repo of $1,036 million. Creating a market value equity of $11,106 million
and increasing the earnings per share to $1.40 per share.
The cash held for the company will be $425 million plus the cash net cash pro-
vided by the operating activities, which last year represented $548 million. With
this cash creation the company would cover their future investments and finan-
cial obligations, including their operating leases.
This new capital structure will affect the credit rating of the company, but it will
be the same as their competitors on average because so far Bed, Bath and Be-
yond have not taken any debt and had low credit risk, but this was inefficient
form a capital structure point of view and the financial markets will see this pro-
gram as a good sign for the share value.
4. Recommendation
The company should implement the share repurchase program for $400 million
and debt structure of 40% D/E. However, the company should keep an eye on
their future cash creation and keep the optimal capital structure and analyzing
other methods to structure capital as a dividend policy or a one time pay divi-
dend to the shareholders.
Classification: Confidential