Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cdi Chapter 1
Cdi Chapter 1
The word Investigation came from the Latin Word "investigo" or "investigatum" which means to search or to look for.
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION - is a legal inquiry by virtue of a complaint, to follow up, examine, trace, track and search, step by step by patient and meticulous
observation, the fact of the commission of a crime, the identity of the actors, and the circumstances attendant thereto, by careful evaluation of all available evidences to the end
that violators of law be brought to the bar of justice, and the innocent be relieved there from (Sadili & Pena, 1998).
- is an Art which deals with the identity and location of the offender and provide evidence of his guilt through criminal proceedings.
2. Investigation while the suspect is “at large” as distinguished from fugitive from justice.
“AT LARGE” means the suspect is not under arrest or detention not being a wanted person in the eyes of the law, and therefore cannot be lawfully arrested
without a warrant.
“FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE” is necessarily an escapee from detention or a escaped prisoner while serving sentence by virtue of a final judgment rendered by a court
of competent jurisdiction who can be legally arrested (par. C, Sec 5, Rule 113, Rules of Court) without the necessity of a warrant of arrest.
3. The pieces of evidence to prove the guilt of the accused are gathered.
It is an art because it is governed by rigid rules or fixed legal procedures but most often based on intuition and sometimes by chance.
It is a science because it involves the application of knowledge of forensic sciences in the process of identifying, locating, collecting, processing, and/or evaluating
physical evidences.
At present, Many famous authors claim that criminal investigation is both an art and science. It exists today as the result of countless development since policing
was conceived and then institutionalized.
4. To arrest suspects.
2. It helps the five pillars of the Criminal Justice System in recognizing and identifying criminal and provides clues or information in promoting social justice.
3. An aid in enforcing the laws and the protection of lives and properties.
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR is so-called the superstar in the process of investigation. He must be capable of observation and a rational thinker. Many times, a police
investigator is being tested with his discretion. DISCRETION is the wise use of one’s own judgment.
- Also a person who can carry the objectives of criminal investigation.
CHARACTERISTICS OF INVESTIGATOR:
1. PERSEVERANCE = refers to the steadfastness, persistence and resolution to bring the desired conclusion in spite of obstacles connected with criminal investigation.
2. ENDURANCE = this is the ability to last physically and mentally hence, he must have the extraordinary physical and mental energy, enduring sleepless nights and tiresome
days.
3. INCORRUPTIBLE HONESTY AND INTEGRITY = in the practice of his art , there is the ever temptations of money, women and drinks where these are present in every corner
playing tricks of temptations.
5. ACTING ACTIVITY
= It is the ability to go down to the level of the minor, the prostitute or the slum dwellers, or the level of the other professionals or the members of the elite.
8. COURAGE
= It is the moral fortitude to tell the truth no matter who will be hurt.
10. Working knowledge of criminal Law, Evidence, Criminal Procedure, and Special Penal Laws.
D. Observation ability- the ability to observed, noting and recording of facts (using the sense of seeing and hearing)
CHAPTER 2
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
2100 B. C. BABYLON: as civilization developed, social and cultural traditions were codified into formal laws.
The CODE OF HAMMURABI was then implemented to detect those who refused to obey the law. It imposes the
LEX TALIONES principle where punishment of an offender is equal to what he did. It is known to be the principle of “An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.”
5th CENTURY B.C., ROME: Rome created the first specialized investigative unit. It was named as QUESTORS/TRACKERS/MURDERERS.
6th CENTURY B.C. ATHENS: Unpaid magistrates (judges), were appointed by the citizens to make decisions for the cases presented to them.
In the later part of 19 TH Century, England’s king, Alfred the Great established a system of “mutual pledge” (social Control), which organized for the security of the
country into several levels:
1. TEN TITHING - One hundred persons are grouped into one under the charge of a High Constable.
2. TITHING – Ten persons are grouped together to protect one another and to assume responsibility for the acts of the group’s members. The one who heads this group is called
Tithing Man.
*SHIRES – The divisions of a specific geographic area. It is being controlled by the king and governed by a Shire-reeve, or Sheriff.
At about the time of Christ, Rome: The Roman Emperor Augustus picked out special, highly qualified members of the military to form the following:
1. PRAETORIAN GUARD – This was considered the first police officers, their job is to protect the palace and the emperor.
2. PRAEFECTUS URBI – Their function is to protect the city. They have both executive and judicial power.
3. VIGILES OF ROME - The vigiles began as fire fighters, they were eventually also given law enforcement responsibilities and they patrolled Rome’s streets day and night. The
vigiles could be considered the civil police force designed to protect citizens.
TIME OF WINCHESTER
1285 A.D., England: THE STATUTE OF WINCHESTER was enacted establishing a rudimentary criminal justice system in which most of the responsibility for law
enforcement remained with the people themselves.
3. Parish Constable
1720’s, England: JONATHAN WILD – a master criminal who became the London’s most effective criminal investigator.
He was the most famous THIEF-CATCHER in 1720s. He conceived the idea of charging a fee for locating and returning stolen property to its rightful
owners.
1750s, England: HENRY FIELDING –He was the creator and a magistrate of the Bow Street Runners; he formed a group of police officers attached to the Bow Street
Court, not in uniform performing criminal investigative functions.
1753, England: JOHN FIELDING – The “blind” younger brother of Henry Fielding who took over the control of Bow Street Court in 1753. He also introduced the
practice of developing informants, printing wanted notices, employing criminal raids, and bearing firearms and handcuffs.
1800, London: PATRICK COLQUHOUN – A prominent London President who proposed the unique idea of creating sizeable uniformed force to police the city of
London in order to remedy the public outcry concerning the increase of criminality during the early 1800s.
1811, France: EUGENE “FRANCOIS” VIDOCQ - established a squad of ex-convicts to aid the Paris Police in investigating crimes. He worked under the theory of “Set a
thief to catch a thief.”
He is credited, as the founder of La Surete, France’s National Detective Organization.
1829, London: ROBERT PEELS – The founder and chief organizer of London Metropolitan Police. He introduced the techniques in detecting crimes such as
detectives concealing themselves, and secretly photographing and recording conversations.
1835, TEXAS RANGERS was organized as the first law enforcement agency with statewide investigative authority. This is the forerunner of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI).
1839, Birth Year of Photography: WILLIAM HENRY FOX TALBOT explained a photographic process he had invented to the Royal Society of London.
1839, JACQUES MANDE DAGUERRE gave a public demonstration in Paris of his discovery on the Photographic process he developed in collaboration with
Nicephore Niepce.
(1847-1915), Dr. HANS GROSS – The earliest advocate of criminal investigation as a science. Gross was a native of Austria, born in Graz. Educated in law, he became
interested in investigation while serving as an examining magistrate. He became a professor of Criminology at the University of Vienna.
1852, U.S.A: CHARLES DICKENS is a great novelist in which through his story entitled bleak house, he introduced the term detective to the English language.
1852, U.S.A: ALLAN PINKERTON. This individual truly deserves the title of “America’s Founder of Criminal Investigation.”
- Among methods pioneered by Pinkerton were; “shadowing, roping, undercover.”
1856, U.S.A: KATE WAYNE: The first woman detective in the history of criminal investigation. She was hired by the Pinkerton Agency and contributed to the
resolutions of big cases of the United States of America.
1901, ACT NO. 70, otherwise known as the CHARTER OF MANILA. The creation of a police force for the city of Manila.
JANUARY 9, 1901 – The Manila Police Department was organized with Col. Matthew Harmon (1901-1903) as its first chief of police.
AUGUST 8, 1901 – The Philippine Constabulary was organized that serves as the territorial force for maintenance of peace and order in the country.
1909-1924 JOHN EDGAR HOOVER – He became the head of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which was established by the attorney general from 1909 to 1924.
1913, PHILIPPINES - The official genesis of Criminal Investigation in the Manila Police Department, presently the Western Police District took place.
1918, England, “TEAM POLICING” was introduced in order to win the support of the public.
1954, USA: Dr. PAUL KIRK – The best known Criminalist who headed the Department of Criminalistics at the University of California, USA.
1966, USA: MIRANDA vs ARIZONA – The US Supreme Court established procedural guidelines for taking criminal confessions. The case is the origin of the present
Miranda rights of every accused under the custody of police.
1. ACT No. 175 = The law that establishes the Insular Police Force which was entitled “An Act Providing For The Organization And Government of an Insular Constabulary.” It is
the organic act creating the Philippine Constabulary (PC).
Approved July 18, 1901.
2. ACT No. 225 = This is the law which established the Philippine Constabulary.
Approved October 3, 1901.
4. RA No. 4864 = The law otherwise known as the Police Act of 1966, It created the Office of the Police Commission (now National Police Commission). It was under the Office of
the President and was created as the supervisory agency to oversee the training and professionalization of the local Police forces. Through this law, reformation and
professionalization of the police service gained official recognition. Approved September 8, 1966 authored by Cong. Teodulo C. Natividad.
5. Proclamation No. 1081 = the declaration of Martial Law in the country by Ferdinand E. Marcos on September 21, 1972. Consequently, military officers from the Philippine
Constabulary (PC) were designated as Officers-in-Charge of the respective police department of the different cities and municipalities and took control of the supervision,
administration and operation thereof. Those were the days where a young first lieutenant of the PC requires a peace officer with a higher rank including the chief of police to
salute him.
6. PD No. 421= This is the law that integrates the police force in greater scope in Manila area to test its effectiveness particularly the first four cities: MANILA, QUEZON,
CALOOCAN AND PASAY.
7. It was MAYOR ARSENIO LACSON who proposed the idea that police should be integrated. The idea of Mayor Lacson became popular and was adopted for implementation to
the provinces.
8. By the mandate of this law, the Metropolitan Police Force (MPF) was formed and created whose officers and men are regular members of the PC. The four (4) cities and
thirteen (13) comprising Greater Manila (GMA) were placed under the exclusive military and police authority of the MPF.
9. PD No. 482 = The law that integrates the police force in the provincial level particularly the provinces of PAMPANGA, NUEVA ECIJA, BULACAN, AND MISAMIS ORIENTAL.
Approved June 13, 1974.
10. PD No. 765 = Stipulated that the office of the National Police Commission was under the office of the Ministry of the National Defense (now Department of National
Defense).
Approved August 8, 1975.
11. RA No. 6975 = the Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) Act of 1990. This is the law that created the PNP and subsequently dissolving the PC whose officers
and rank and file were given the privilege either to join the AFP or the PNP within the period as provided therein.
12. RA No. 8551 = The PNP Reform and Reorganization Act of 1998 which is now the operational law that governs over the PNP. Approved February 25, 1998.
13. 1987 PHIL CONSTITUTION, Art 16, Sec 6 = “The state established and maintained one police force, which shall be NATIONAL IN SCOPE AND CIVILIAN IN CHARACTER, to be
administered and controlled by the National Police Commission. The authority of the local executives over the police shall be provided by law.”
14. RA No. 7438 = An act defining certain rights of person arrested, detained or under custodial investigation as well as the duties of the arresting, detaining, and investigation
officers and providing penalties for violation thereof.
CHAPTER 3
ARREST, SEARCH AND SEIZURE
The term “arrest” came from the Latin word “arrestare” which means “cause to stop” and “restare” which means “stay behind”. These terms were used as early as during the
14th century.
On the other hand, the word search was derived from the Anglo-Norman word “searcher,” Old French cerchier which means “to explore,” Latin word “circare" which means “go
around in circles.”
TERMS TO UNDERSTAND:
1. Warrant of Arrest is
- an order in writing issued in the name of the
People of the Philippines;
- signed by a judge;
- directed to a peace officer, commanding him to arrest the person designated and take him into custody of the law in order that he may be bound to
answer for the commission of an offense.
2. Warrant Officer is any authorized member from the law enforcement agency usually from the Philippine National Police (PNP) or National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) who
holds a warrant for execution within 10 days from receipt subject to renewal in case of failure to execute the same
3. Alias Warrant refers to the warrant of arrest issued by a judge to the peace officer after returning the original warrant of arrest after the lapse of the 10-day validity period.
4. Search Warrant is another order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by the judge and directed to a peace officer commanding him to search
for personal property and bring it before the court.
5. Richard Doe/ John (Jane) Doe Warrant is a warrant containing no specific person to be arrested but only descriptions based from the testimonies of the victim/s or the
witnesses/es. It contains the physical description of the accused as well as other factors to be considered for the identification of the accused (Sadili & Pena, 1998).
6. Arrest is the actual taking of a person or persons into custody by an authority in order that he/they may be bound to answer for the commission of an offense.
8. Complaint is a sworn written statement charging a person or a group of persons of an offense that is subscribed by the offended party such as the victim/s of the offense
committed, or any other peace officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated.
9. Information is an accusation in writing charging a person or a group of persons of an offense that is subscribed by the prosecutor or fiscal. It is substantiated on oath and
includes the name of the party, the offense committed, facts of the offense and other factors relevant. (Curton,1989) .
In Morano vs. Vido, it was held that warrant of arrest may be issued by administrative authorities like the President of the Philippines and the Commissioner of the
Bureau of Immigration and Deportation only for the purpose of carrying out a final finding of a violation of law like an order of deportation or an order of contempt, and not for
the sole purpose of investigation or prosecution.
However, warrant of arrest issued by the BID for purposes of investigation is null and void for being unconstitutional (BOC-CID vs. Judge de la Rosa).
1. When, in his (peace officer) presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense.
In people vs. Sucro, it was held that when a police officer sees the offense, although at a distance, or hears the disturbance created thereby, and proceeds at once
to the scene thereof, he may effect an arrest without a warrant. The offense is deemed committed in the presence or within the view of the officer.
2. When an offense has just been committed and he (peace officer) has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be
arrested has committed it.
Cases: In Go vs. Maguan, six days after the shooting, as petitioner presented before the San Juan Police Station to verify news reports that he is being hunted, the
police detained him because an eyewitness had positively identified him as the gunman who shot Maguan. The SC held that there was no valid arrest; it cannot be considered as
within the meaning of the offense had just been committed in as much as six days had already elapsed; neither did the policeman have personal knowledge of facts that Go shot
Maguan.
Those who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped
while being transferred from one confinement to another may be arrested by any peace officer or private person without warrant.
4. When the right is validly waived. This is when the person arrested consented to the arrest, despite of no warrant showed, the person is willing to be taken into custody.
Cases: In People vs. Dural, the illegality of the arrest is cured when the accused files a petition for bail. Appellant is estopped from questioning the illegality of his
arrest when he voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court by entering a plea of not guilty and by participating in the trial. (People vs. Lopez).
Provided that the search is contemporaneous to the arrest and within the permissible area. A person lawfully arrested may be searched
for dangerous weapons or anything, which may be used as proof of the commission of an offense, without search warrant.
The warrantless search and seizure, as an incident to a lawful arrest, may extend beyond the person of the one arrested to include the
premises or surroundings under his immediate control.
In Posadas vs. CA, the SC upheld the validity of a search made by police officers on one who, confronted by the police because he was acting suspiciously, ran away.
But in People vs. Rodriguez, the arrest and consequent search of the accused, simply because “he was acting suspiciously” was held invalid.
Under the plain view doctrine, police officers can seize articles or objects which inadvertently come to their view without exerting any effort and which object is
incriminatory to the accused. Based from decisions of trial courts, the doctrine includes the five senses of an individual to detect violations of law.
The doctrine requires that a police officer in order to validate the confiscation of an object in plain view must have a right to be in that place and whatever objects
become obvious or apparent without obstruction or impairment may be subject to seizure.
The search of moving vehicles is popularly called as “check points.” This instance of warrantless search cannot be done anytime. The “checkpoints” must be done
during “abnormal times” when the public welfare is at stake. Thus, every vehicle that passes the certain checkpoint can be searched without search warrant
Inspectors of a certain building for the purpose of maintaining sanitation, fire and building regulations are required to enter every building as well as every room
necessary to be inspected without arming themselves with search warrant. The inspectors need not be armed with search warrant to enter the premises or rooms of the
building to be inspected.
If the person submitted himself voluntarily to be searched, it is good, as there is a search warrant because of the consent of the person to be
searched. The consent of the person must not have been because of intimidation, threat of the person making the search. Thus, the Supreme Court held that in the cases of:
People vs. Omaweng, the accused while driving a vehicle, was stopped at a checkpoint, and when the vehicle was inspected, the soldiers asked
permission to see the contents of a bag which was partially covered by a spare tire. The accused consented, and upon inspection, the bag was found to contain marijuana. The
SC ruled that there was valid waiver.
In People vs. Ramos, the SC said that the evidence for the prosecution clearly disclosed that Ramos voluntarily allowed himself to be frisked, and that
he gave the gun to the police voluntarily; thus, there was a valid waiver.
However, in People vs. Barros, the “silence of the accused” during the warrant less search was not construed as consent.
CHAPTER 4
BASIC ELEMENTS OF
INVESTIGATING CRIME SCENE
Before a criminal investigation be true, it should include its elements such as recognition, collection, preservation, evaluation and presentation (RCPEP) in the
court.
Recognition involves the efforts of identifying data, including physical things that may provide relevant information regarding the criminal case being investigated.
That is why recognition is otherwise known as identification stage of investigation.
Collection, which refers to the act of gathering those identified data or facts, or physical things that are significant to the case under investigation. Collection maybe
done by scraping the bloodstains found at the crime scene, interviewing the neighbor who saw the burglary, or examination of drug dealer’s bankbook.
Preservation. It is a function that is almost simultaneously performed during the collection stage. It includes act of keeping the collected evidences in their true and
original for, preventing contamination or destruction of its substantive value. Preservation does not only involve the process of packaging physical evidences in order that they
can be safely transmitted to the evidence custodian or to the crime laboratory. It covers the process of maintaining the objectivity of facts or information that has been gathered
from the testimony of witnesses, victims or other persons 0involved in the criminal case.
Presentation is the function that is primarily manifested inside the courtroom. The investigator, with the help of the prosecutor, must be able to present facts and
information in a very simple and convenient manner in order to convince the court and other parties involved in the criminal case about the validity and truthfulness of the
evidences they are trying to prove or establish
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
1. Aid the investigator in searching the crime scene or other places which maybe sources of evidence.
2. Guide the investigator in formulating questions in interviewing complainant, witnesses and other interested parties or in the process of interrogating a suspect.
3. Assists the investigator and the desk officer in making brief statements of facts in the logbook/police blotter and in reports.
4. Help the investigator in preparing the MODUS OPRANDI report – How the crime perpetrated?
WHO QUESTIONS: These are questions used to inquire on the identity of the victims or offended party, name of suspect, accomplices, accessories and witnesses of the crime.
4. Who is the offender/perpetrator/culprit? Who are the companions, associates, or accomplices of the perpetrator?
WHAT QUESTIONS: The purpose of these types of questions is to find out what happened or what took place before, during and immediately after the commission of the
offense.
1. What happened?
WHERE QUESTIONS: These are questions that localize the place of the incident- the city or town, the district or barangay, the street or road, the number of the house or building.
Where questions are necessary in specifically pinpointing the particular location of the crime scene.
WHEN QUESTIONS: These are questions needed to determine and fix the time, day, month and year when the crime was committed. When questions should be specified and as
accurate as possible.
HOW QUESTIONS: These are designed to help the investigator determine how the crime was committed, the means/tools are employed, the crime was discovered, the culprit
enters the building/room. How questions are very significant in preparing the modus operandi file or report.
1. State the problem –the problem would be; to identify, locate and arrest the perpetrator of the crime and attempt to recover all stolen property in a thorough legal
manner designed to ensure the greatest probability of justice .
2. Form hypothesis –to construct an explanation for an occurrence by knowing the ff;
a. Motive- that which causes a person to act in a certain manner
b. Knowledge/opportunity- given chance to commit crime
c. Means/Instrumentality – the things used to commit crime
3. Observed and Experiment – serves as a check for the hypothesis that is incorrect or correct.
5. Draw conclusion
a. Has the stated problem been answered?
b. Does evidence support hypothesis?
c. Has each stage of investigative method been conducted in a legal manner?
d. Does data interpretation support a recommendation for prosecution?
“Do not touch, alter, move, or transfer any object at the crime scene unless it is properly marked, measured, sketched and/or photographed.” The purpose of this
rule is to avoid the mutilation, alteration and contamination (MAC) of the physical evidences found at the crime scene.
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATOR is a person who is charged with the duty of carrying out the objectives of criminal investigation. The primary job of the investigator is to
discover whether or not an offense has been committed under the law after determining the 5Ws and H.
1. How it was committed
(sequence/ manner of commission).
In criminal investigation, we have the so-called three tools or sometimes called as the I’s of cr5iminal investigation to include: Information, Interview and
Interrogation and Instrumentation.
1. INFORMATION = It is the knowledge or facts which the investigator had gathered or acquired from persons or documents, which are pertinent or relevant
concerning the commission of the crime or criminal activities.
1. Regular Sources = Records, files from the government or non-government agencies, news items. The bulk of application of this nature is news items. Included
also is news or TV broadcast, intercepted radio, telephone messages and stored computer area.
2. Cultivated Sources = Information furnished by informants or informers.
3. Grapevines sources =When the information is disclosed by the underworld characters such as prisoners or ex-convicts.
INTERVIEW is the simple questioning of a person who cooperates with the investigator. In account of the interview, the witnesses voluntarily give their accounts
about the commission of a crime.
INTERROGATION is the process of obtaining an admission or confession from those suspects who committed the crime. It is confrontational in nature, which means
that the suspect is confronted about his participation in the commission in an offense. is the act or process of questioning somebody closely, often in an aggressive manner,
especially as part of an official investigation or trial
Goals of interrogation:
To gain all facts in order to determine the method of operation or modus operandi and the circumstances of the crime in question.
3. INSTRUMENTATION = This is sometimes called Criminalistics. It is the process of applying instruments or tools of the police sciences in criminal investigation and detection.
This is the use of the Police Laboratory in the examination of physical evidences.
CRIME SCENE is said to be the “TREASURE ISLAND”, when it comes to criminal investigation. It is because several pieces of evidence are mostly found in the crime
scene, which are very relevant for the solution of the crime. The term crime is
also defined as any act or omission in punishable by law forbidding or commanding it.
SUGGESTED PROCEDURES OF
CRIME RESPONSE
1. The Means of Reporting = Refers to the method of reporting the crime whether it reached the station through phone call, personal appearance or others means.
2. The Time of Report = The exact time of the report to include minute must be recorded.
3. The Receiver of Report = The identity of the one who received the report in the station must be properly noted.
4. The Time of Dispatch = The time when the Desk Officer dispatches the investigator/s is also recorded, together with the names of the investigator, with the means of
transportation, either by mobile car, taxi or other means.
5. The Time of Arrival = The time of arrival of the investigating team at the crime scene should be noted. The situation in the area should also be noted whether it is windy, rainy,
sunny or any other description of the climate in the immediate area.
2. Identify and retain the person who first notified the police for questioning.
10.The team leader assigns the duties of the searchers if assistants are present.
1. OFFICER-IN-CHARGE/ TEAM LEADER – The one who directs the processing of the crime scene.
2. ASSISTANT TEAM LEADER – The one who implements or executes the order/s coming from his/her superiors.
4. SKETCHER – Make sketches of the immediate, background and inside the scene of the crime.
5. MASTER NOTE TAKER – The one who writes down in short hand all observations at the crime scene such as: weather condition, time of dispatch and time of arrival at the
crime scene and other relevant data that’s should be taken down note.
6. EVIDENCE MAN – The one in charge in the collection, preservation, tagging of the articles of evidence found at the crime scene.
7. MEASURER – Makes all relevant measurements of the scene such as: the distance of the body of the victim to the firearm used; in motor vehicle collision, the distances of the
two vehicles to the points of references.
2. Double Strip or Grid Method = Is somewhat similar to Strip Method, the rectangle is traversed first parallel to the bas and then parallel to the side.
4. Wheel Method = This type of searching the crime scene is applicable to areas
which are somewhat circular in size or area. The searchers shall assemble at the
center of the crime scene, then simultaneously searching the crime scene outward.
5. Zone or Sector Method = The area to be searched is divided into quadrants and each searcher or a group of searcher is assigned to the quadrant.
CHAPTER 5
SKETCHING THE CRIME SCENE
Sketch is the graphic representation of the scene of the crime with complete measurements of the relative distances of relevant object and conditions obtaining
therein.
Sketching refers to the process of recording of information with respect to its location, position, measurement, orientation and details of findings in a sketch pad
through symbols, arts and figures.
1. Rough Sketch is the sketch made by the investigator at the crime scene which is full of important details but without the scale of proportion. This is used as the basis for the
finished sketch.
2. Finished sketch is the sketch with a scale of proportion and drawn by a draftsman which can be used for court presentation. Rough and finished sketches if requested by the
court shall be presented by the draftsman to clear doubts of the jury.
2. To express the precise location of objects and their relationship to other objects and its surroundings.
3. To assist the prosecutor and the judge in understanding conditions at the crime scene;
4. To supplement photographs;
PARTS OF SKETCH
The following are parts of sketch that is usually practiced by the Philippine National Police (PNP). This may vary depending on the sketcher and purpose of sketch.
1. Title – it refers to the crime committed or the incident happened such as vehicular accident, homicide case, drowning, rape case and others.
2. Body – refers to the sketch proper to include the position of the victim and other items in the crime scene. It includes proper measurements of distances of objects in the
crime scene.
To find the north without compass, determine the east where the sun rises. Facing
east, your LEFT SIDE is the north direction.
4. Nature of case – refers to the status of the case whether currently committed or days have passed after its discovery.
6. Date/time of incident – refers to the exact time and date of the incident. This can be gathered through interview from eyewitnesses and other persons in the area.
7. Name of victim – the part of the sketch where name of the victim is written
8. Name of suspect – refers to the part of the sketch where the name of the suspect is written.
9. Legend = This is usually placed at the bottom of sketch outside the sketch of the scene. Numbers represent the objects in the crime or letters in order not to unnecessarily
crowd the graphic presentation. Their descriptions are found in the legend.
Example, No. 3 in the sketch is explained in the legend is a pistol, caliber 45, Serial No. 1234, loaded in the chamber, with five rounds of live
ammunitions in the magazine
10. Signatory – the part of the sketch where the name of the sketcher and the team leader or the officer in charge are written and signed.
11. Date and time- refers to the exact time the sketch was made.
1. Measurements = This is the element of sketch wherein measurements are shown in the sketch to show accurate spaces and distances of relevant objects to their point of
reference.
2. Essential Items = All items in the scene must be included. Never decide outright that some items are irrelevant. As you proceed in the investigation, these seemingly irrelevant
items will become relevant or material in the investigation.
3. Scale Of Proportion = It is the element of the finished sketch. It is the essential of the finished sketch to the actual size or measurements at the scene. The scale of 1:50 means
that one inch in the sketch measurement is 50 inches in the actual scene measurement.
4. Victim and Suspect identification = This includes the name of the victim. Other identification data may be included if available such as: birthdate and birthplace.
5. Time and date = It includes the exact time of the preparation of the sketch but most importantly the time and date of the occurrence of the crime should be recorded.
1. Sketch of Locality – It deals with the vicinity of the crime scene in relation to
The environs, to include neighboring buildings, structures, or means of access leading to the scene. This kind of sketch is applied in conflagrations, suspected to be arson,
indicating the origin of the fire and how is spread naturally or unnaturally against the wind.
2. Sketch of Grounds – This is the kind of sketch which illustrates the scene of the crime with the nearest physical surroundings, such as the room adjacent or opposite the room
of the crime scene, the number of floors of a building or house, the yard and the other natural structures.
3. Sketch of Details – It includes the positions and exact locations of the physical evidence in the crime scene. It describes the immediate scene only like the room which the
crime was committed and the details of items in the room.
4. Cross Projection – It also describes the immediate scene only, specifically inside a room as the scene of the crime. The room is treated as the cardboard box where
the side and the cover are collapsed to the same plane as the bottom. The bottom serves as the floor, the four sides representing the walls and the cover representing the
ceiling.
FORMS OF INFORMATION
1. Sensory form – This is the form of information wherein information was acquired through the five senses: eyes, ears, nose, tongue and hands can perceive the manifestation
of criminal event.
2. Physical form – The form of information that can give information to the person because of its physical appearance. The information may actually be in physical (real) form,
physical objects w/c proves upon evaluation to be a clue in investigation.
CHAPTER 5
CLASSES OF EVIDENCE
1. Testimonial Evidence – most common form of evidence obtained by interview and interrogation of which witnesses smell, hear, taste and touch are being described through
oral and written testimony.
3. Physical or Real Evidence – are physical objects used as evidence w/c are obtained through searches at the scene of the crime. Articles and material found in connection with
investigation, which aid in establishing the identity of the perpetrator.
1. Corpus delicti – objects/substances which are essential parts of the body of the crime.
2. Associative evidence – evidence which links the suspect to the crime scene or offense such as fingerprints & shoe prints.
3. Tracing evidence – article w/c assist the investigation in locating the suspect such as ID and other personal documents (birth certificate, diary) that may identify the person
concerned.
4. Circumstantial evidence – Identification is being established indirectly by proving other facts or circumstances from which, either alone or in connection with other facts. The
identity of the perpetrator can be inferred.
DEFINITION OF EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE is the means, sanctioned by these rules, of ascertaining in a judicial proceeding the truth respecting a matter of fact (Sec 1, Rule 128, Rules of Court).
EVIDENCE is any material which tends to persuade the court of the truth or probability of some facts asserted before it (Murphy, A Practical Approach). It is the
means by which any alleged matter of fact, the truth of which is submitted to investigation, is established or disproved (Carter, Treatise Cases and Statutes on Evidence)
A. COLLECTING EVIDENCE
– All items that were found in the crime scene should be collected. The collecting officer should not decide whether a certain item is relevant or
irrelevant. Small pieces of evidences also must have to be given importance.
In collecting firearm as evidence found in the crime scene, cautious action should be employed. The firearm should be lifted using string or handkerchief in its
trigger guard to avoid destruction of possible latent prints in the firearm.
Liquid evidences such as blood, mucous, urine and other body fluid can be
collected using dropper and stored in a sealed container to maintain the same physical nature as found in the crime scene. However, clotted blood and other hardened
evidences can be collected by scraping with the use of any available instrument. Samples are very important for laboratory testing.
B. MARKING EVIDENCE – As evidence is collected, it is individually marked with the initials of the investigator. The marking tool depends upon the nature of the evidence. If it is
a hard object such as metals, the initial are scratched or engraved by
the use of sharp-pointed steel, which is called stylus.
Revolvers must be marked separately on the BARREL, FRAME, BUTT, CYLINDER, and STOCK. Tape should also be put around the bore and the frame of the gun with
signature of the investigator.
Pistols must be marked on the BARREL, FRAME, BUTT, MAGAZINE, and STOCK. Tape must also be put around the gun with signature to avoid changing the parts of
the gun that may affect the result of laboratory examination.
Rifles should be marked on the BARREL, FRAME, MAGAZINE, BOLT OR SLIDE. All magazines and accessories shall also be marked.
Revolver Cylinder – Aside from the mark on the cylinder, the chamber facing the firing pin must be marked as soon as it is opened for examination. A
drawing must depict the chamber facing the firing pin, the respective position of the fired empty shells, misfired or dud cartridges.
The direction of the rotation of the cylinder must also be sketched and noted. Colt revolvers have a clockwise direction of rotation of the cylinder. Smith and
Wesson revolvers have a counter clockwise direction of cylinder rotation.
Strictly regulations say they must be marked inside the mouth of fired empty shells. It is nearly impossible to mark them inside the mouth, especially .22 caliber
shells. But they could be marked on the side of the body of the shells, not on the base.
It should be admitted that there is really the big difference of what is being practiced in reality and theoretically written in books. The lesson is, for as long as the
evidence can be properly marked and kept as evidence.
BULLETS/ SLUGS/ BALLS – A bullet or slug can be marked on the ogive or nose as well as in the base. The initials of the investigators and/ or date should be marked
on those parts so that the riflings (land and grooves) found in the bullet or slug will not be disturbed because they are very important for laboratory examination.
Shotgun balls when collected in the crime scene should also be put into container with tag that indicates where it was found with some relevant measurements
aside from what is sketched.
Every collected evidence is marked. If they are of the same class or type such as Cal 45 caliber fired empty shells, they are marked consecutively such as: JBV 1, JBV
2, JBV 3 and so forth and so on, depending on the initials of the investigator. JBV are the initials of the investigator SPO4 Jezreel B Vicente.
C. TAGGING EVIDENCE - Evidence which by their nature could not be marked on each surface such as blood, hairs, fibers, are placed in the plastic container where that
container is then marked, we call such practice as tagging the physical evidence with the use of card where the initials of the investigator, date and time of collection, specific
case and other information can be written.
D. PRESERVING EVIDENCE
Perishable material should be preserved in order that they will reach the court in the same physical condition as when they where collected from the crime scene.
This is the work of laboratory technician.
IMPORTANT TERMS:
1. Chain of custody refers to the number of persons who handled and possessed the pieces of evidence the moment that they were collected, marked and tagged, up to the time
of the final disposition of the case. The basic rule is to limit the chain of custody to avoid tampering, substitution or loss. If the evidence needs laboratory examination, the
investigator must submit direct to the laboratory without delegating it to the other
persons. The submission is accompanied by a written request and to be officially receipted by the receiving officer of the laboratory. The receipt must have legible identification
of the receiver, together with his signature, time and date of receipt. If the evidence requires no laboratory examination, it must be submitted to the Evidence Custodian duly
receipted.
2. Theory is the imaginative contemplation of reality, direct intellectual apprehension, insight or body of generalizations and principles developed in association with the practice
in a certain field of activity. Theories serve as bases of the investigator to come up with a lead relevant to the investigation.
3. Field inquiry is the general questioning of all persons at, near or around the crime scene for purposes of gathering information about the crime.
1. INTENT – As a general rule, intent is presumed in any crime. Since man is a rational being, the law presumes that when he performs an act, he does so freely and voluntarily
and that he intended the natural consequences of that act. Lack of criminal intent due to an honest mistake of fact or involuntariness on his part are matters that the offender
must prove (Kapunan, Jr & Faylona, 1993 Edition).
The terms intent and malice should be distinguished from each other. The term intent is the conscious malice that taints the act with criminality.
Motive is the moving power, which impels one to act for a definite
result as distinguished from intent, which is the purpose in using a particular means to effect, such result. Intent is an element of a felony while motive is not. Motives only
become importance when the identity of the felon has not been clearly established. (Reyes, J.B.L., 1993, RPC, p. 39)
2. OPPORTUNITY – is the chance or time given to the offender in committing the crime. Without such chance or opportunity given to the offender, there could be no crime
committed. In so many instances, the victims are the ones making opportunity for the offender to commit such crime.
3. INSTRUMENTALITY – This element involves the use of materials and other things which are essential in the commission of the crime.
1. POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION – this use information that identifies an individual beyond question and is legally acceptable as pertaining to and originating from a particular
individual.
Examples are the following:
Information developed after comparing questioned with inked fingerprints;
Result of DNA analysis of blood and semen.
2. TRACING IDENTIFICATION – this involves the use of all other information that maybe indicative of the personal identity of an individual.
Examples include the following:
Description of witnesses as to the appearance of culprits;
Information about the presence of a suspect’s personal belongings at the crime scene.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
1. Government Records – Police files, NBI files, Bureau of Immigration files, COMELEC files, files from the local jails and the National Bureau of Prisons and other government
agencies.
2. Private Records – From private offices and business and non-government organizations.
3. Intercepted Messages – From telephones, cellular phones, radio telecommunications and other means of communications.
4. Records of the Firearms and Explosive Unit concerning licensed holders of firearms and authorized possessor of explosives.
5. Fire Busting – Tracing the chain of possession of a firearm, from the manufacturer, distributor, seller and to the last processor and possessor. (Applicable in US, wherein This
could be done through the files of the FBI and other US police agencies.
6. Stored Data on Computers and Cellphones – Only experts must be employed to retrieve these stored data.
a. When the computer is OFF at the time of arrival, do not turn it on.
b. When it is ON, do not turn it OFF nor touch its mouse or keyboard.
c. The unplugging of the computer whether it is ON or OFF should be done by pulling out the cable directly from the back of the Central Processing Unit.
d. Each unplugged cable should be marked in the same marking corresponding to the socket from where the cable was unplugged.
e. The computer should be carefully handled and packed for transport to the police station.
f. Only computer forensic expert should search for any information or evidence contained in the hardware.
g. The expert should duplicate the computer and the evidence custodian for future court presentation should keep the original. Search and analysis must be
undertaken using the image disk.
CHAPTER 6
INTERVIEW
Interview is the simple questioning of a person believed to possess information, which are relevant to the investigation of a crime or on criminal activities. In an
interview, the interviewee is willing and cooperative with the person conducting the interview.
Cognitive Interview is a form or technique in the conduct of interview upon willing and cooperative witnesses, where they are given the full opportunity to narrate
their accounts without intervention, interruption and interference from the interviewer. After the subject has finished his narration, the investigator now subjects him to the
style of direct examination and cross-examination, to clarify the unexplained portions to arrive at a vivid and complete picture of the testimony.
Question and Answer style of interview are also practiced by some investigators whereby after each question by the investigator, the interviewee is required to
answer on what he knows about what is being asked.
“Never conduct or let anyone conduct an interview if the interviewer has not gone to the crime scene.” The questioning should be in agreement with the facts and
conditions at the crime scene. The questioning will lead wayward for the interviewer who had not seen personally the crime scene and he will not be in a position to distinguish
half-truths, exaggerations of falsehood from the answers of the person being interviewed.
b. Forceful Personality – The appearance of the interviewer and other qualities such as skills of communication techniques or the force of his language are the
mainstays of the strength of his character.
d. Conversational Tone of Voice – His tone of voice must be conversational, not confrontational as in interrogation.
e. Acting Qualities – He must possess the qualities of an actor, salesman and psychologist and know how to use the power of persuasion.
a. Fear of Reprisal – witnesses who lack the courage to face the suspect, his associates or relatives always entertain the fear of reprisal.
b. Great Inconvenience– On the part of those of hands-to-mouth existence there is this real inconvenience, which will deprive them the time to earn for their living
especially during the ordeal of testifying during the trial.
c. Hatred Against the Police – This hatred maybe due to previous bad experience with rogue members of the police organization.
d. Bias of the Witness – The witness maybe an acquaintance, friend, helper, or benefactor of the suspect.
e. Avoidance of Publicity – There are witnesses who are shy and they shun publicity that will bring discomfort to their ordinary or obscure way of living.
f. Family Restriction – Some famous and respected families preserve their reputations by instilling to their members the need of the approval of their elders on
matters affecting their families.
a. Preparation – The investigator should review the facts at the crime scene and information from other sources in order that he would be ready for the questioning.
A background data of the subject should be available so that he could adapt himself to the kind of approach to be employed.
b. Approach – The investigator must carefully select his kind of approach, which maybe a single kind, a combination of two or the application of all techniques.
c. Warming Up – This is done by preliminary or exploratory questions to clear the atmosphere, promote a conducive ground for cordiality, respect and trust for each
other.
d. Cognitive Interview – The subject now is asked to narrate his account without interruption, intervention or interference. It is only after the completion of the
uninterrupted narration that the investigator begins his direct and cross-examinations.
a. One Question at a Time – Multiple, complex and legalistic questions should be avoided. One question at a time is desired.
b. Avoid Implied Answers – The nod of the head or any other body language as a response to the questions should be avoided. The answers must be oral, clear,
explicit and responsive to the questions.
c. Simplicity of Questions – A short simple question at a time is required. If the answer needs qualification, then, it should be allowed. Avoid legalistic questions
such as: who is the murderer; or who are in conspiracy with the subject.
d. Saving Faces – Embarrassing questions on the subject on matters of exaggeration or honest errors about time, distance and description can be avoided if the
investigator will cooperate with the subject “to save his face”. The investigator should not fault or ridicule the subject on these matters.
e. Yes and No Answers – Do not ask questions which could be answered by yes or no only. It will curtail the complete flow of information and will lead to inaccuracy.
c. The Drunken Type – The style of questioning by the investigator should be adapted to the psychology of the subject. When the drunken subject has sobered,
another interview will be conducted, confronting him about his disclosures while in the state of drunkenness. The written statement must be taken during his sobriety.
d. Talkative Type – These are witnesses who are prone to exaggerate, adding irrelevant or new matters to their narration.
e. Honest Witnesses – These are the truthful and cooperative witnesses where the investigator could rely upon, with little or no problem in handling them.
g. Timid Witnesses – They are the shy witnesses. The approach must be friendly and reassuring confidentiality of their information. They should be hidden from the
devouring press by interviews or photo sessions.
h. Refusal to Talk Witnesses – These are the most difficult subjects to deal with. Find out the reasons of their personality. The cause maybe trauma, shock, fear,
hatred, and others. Remove these fetters of silence and they will start talking.
INTERROGATION
Interrogation is the vigorous and confrontational questioning of a reluctant suspect about his participation in a crime. It is confrontational in the sense that the
investigator places the guilt on the accused. This process is also applied to an uncooperative or recalcitrant witness.
Purposes of Interrogation:
a. On the part of the suspect; to obtain confession or admission;
b. On the part of the uncooperative or unwilling witness, is to obtain the information he possesses.
Confession is the declaration of the accused acknowledging his guilt arising from
the commission of a crime.
Admission is an acknowledgement of a fact or circumstance without accepting guilt. Guilt maybe inferred in admission. When an accused confessed to the
commission of a crime, he accepts the facts constituting the offense but if he interposes self-defense or other exculpatory grounds, then his acknowledgement is not a
confession but admission.
KINDS OF CONFESSION
1. Extra Judicial Confession – Those made by the suspect during custodial investigation. Simply explained are that those confessions are made outside of the Court.
Sec 3, Rule 133, Rules of Court – Extra judicial confession, not sufficient ground for conviction: An extra judicial confession made by an
accused, shall not be sufficient ground for conviction, unless corroborated by evidence of corpus delicti (body of the crime.)
2. Judicial Confession – Those made by the accused in open Court. The plea of guilt maybe during arraignment or any stage of the proceedings where the accused
changes his plea of not guilty to guilty.
Sec. 2, Rule 129, Rules of Court states that “Judicial Admission is made by the party in the pleadings, or in the course of the trial or other
proceedings do not require proof and cannot be contradicted unless previously shown to have been made through palpable mistake.”
a. Voluntary Extra-judicial Confession- The confession is voluntary when the accused speaks of his free will and accord, without inducement of any kind, with a full and complete
knowledge of the nature and the consequence of the confession.
b. Involuntary Extra-judicial Confession- Confessions obtained through force, threat, intimidation, duress or anything influencing the voluntary act of the confessor.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
Confessions obtained from the defendant by means of force or intimidation/violence is NULL AND VOID, and cannot be used against him/her in the trial.
A confession made under the influence of spiritual advice or exhortation is not admissible.
The same through as confession made under the influence of paternal sentiment is not admissible as evidence.
MIRANDA RIGHTS
MIRANDA RIGHTS originated from the American jurisprudence. Mr. Ernesto Miranda, a Latino was accused of KIDNAPPING and RAPE in the State of Arizona. The
Arizona Police interrogated Mr. Miranda exhaustedly leading to his confession.
Based on his confession, he was charged, tried and convicted. Appeal of his
conviction was made before the Arizona Supreme Court but his conviction was affirmed. The appeal was then elevated to the US Supreme Court where there was a reversal of
the decision and he was acquitted on Constitutional grounds.
It was in this case, entitled Miranda vs. Arizona (Ernesto Miranda versus State of Arizona, USA) that the US Supreme Court laid down the constitutional rights of
the accused during the custodial interrogation. It was incorporated in our 1973 Constitution and later in the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. This is known as the Miranda
Rule, Doctrine, or Warning.
b. Right to counsel of his own choice and if he has none, the government must provide one for him;
These rights COULD BE VALIDLY WAIVED IN WRITING AND WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL in order that the ensuing confession be admissible in evidence. The
confession must also be in writing, signed and sworn to by the accused
A. EMOTIONAL APPEAL – This is a technique where the investigator, combining his skills of an actor and a psychologist, addresses the suspect with an emotional
appeal to confess. Devotees of a religion may belong to this type.
B. SYMPATHETIC APPROACH – The investigator, in his preliminary or probing questions must dig deep into the past troubles, plight and unfortunate events in the life
of the suspect. An offer of help, kindness, friendliness, may win his cooperation.
C. FRIENDLINESS – A friendly approach coupled with a posture of sincerity may induce the suspect to confess.
E. STERN APPROACH – The investigator displays a stern (demands immediate response) personality towards the suspect by using the following methods:
Jolting – In the questioning process, the investigator selects the right moment to shout a pertinent question in an apparent righteous outrage. The suspect’s nerves
will break to a confession.
Opportunity to Lie – The suspect is given all the opportunities to lie. The suspect is questioned about his personal life, family, friends and his knowledge about the
complainant and witnesses. Then the suspect is questioned about his activity prior, during and after the commission of the crime.
a. Rationalization – It is the use of reasons, which is acceptable to the subject that led to the commission of the crime. Thus, it maybe said that sometimes, killing is a
necessity rather than by purpose or design. Robbery maybe a necessity to feed a starving family.
b. Projection – It is the process of putting the blame to other persons, not alone to the suspect. The murderer may blame the mastermind for corrupting him with big
sums of money, or the mastermind blaming the greediness of the victim or the husband blaming the wife for her infidelity.
THE INFORMANT
THE TYPES OF INFORMANTS
a. Anonymous Informant
b. Rival-Elimination Informant – the purpose is to eliminate the rival person or gang due to competition or other motives such as revenge, etc.
f. Confidential Informant - is a person who provides the police with confidential information concerning a past crime or a projected and planned crime.
MOTIVES OF INFORMANTS
a. Vanity – The motive is for self-aggrandizement by gaining favorable attention and importance by police.
b. Civic Mindedness – Those imbued with the sense of duty and obligation to assist the police in their task.
c. Fear – It is the engendered illusion of oppression from enemies or from impending dangers.
d. Repentance – Those lesser criminals such as accomplices or accessories who will have a change in heart to unburden their conscience.
THE INFORMER
c. Places of hang-outs of criminals such as night clubs, bars, hotels, billiard halls and other places
e. Detention Centers such as local jails and the National Bureau of Prisons. In many instances, crimes were solved by planting moles among detention prisoners in
the holding centers of investigative units and in the local jails and also in the National Bureau of Prisons, thru the agreement with prison authorities.
INSTRUMENTATION
– it is a process of applying instruments or tools of the Police Sciences in criminal Investigation and detection (the used of Police Laboratory)
- It is the application of instruments and the laws of physical sciences in the investigation and detection of crimes and criminals. This is otherwise known as
CRIMINALISTICS.
Methods of Instrumentation:
1. Polygraph Examination or Lie Detector Test
2. Police Photography
3. Forensic Medicine
4. Forensic Chemistry and Toxicology
5. Forensic Ballistics
6. Dactyloscopy
7. Questioned Document Examination
8. Odontology / Dental Examination
9. Forensic Psychology
10. Forensic Computer Technology
CHAPTER 7
SURVEILLANCE
SURVEILLANCE is defined as the discreet observation of persons, places and vehicles for the purpose of obtaining information concerning the identities or activities of criminals.
SURVEILLANT is the person who conducts the surveillance or performs the observations.
SUBJECT refers to a person or a group of persons, place that is being observed by a surveillant.
COVERT SURVEILLANCE is the type of surveillance, which is conducted to subject, who are unaware that they are under surveillance.
OVERT SURVEILLANCE is a surveillance conducted to subject who is aware that he is under observation.
Moving Surveillance is performed by surveillant by foot or with the use of transportation vehicles in observing the subject.
Other surveillants may remain outdoor, posing as carpenters, plumbers, or other means of communication will coordinate their activities with those surveillants
inside their observation room.
“SHADOWING” OR “TAILING” refers to the act of the surveillant of following his subject to detect criminal activities, to establish the association of subject, to find a
wanted person and many other purposes.
“ROPING” is a kind of undercover work wherein surveillant assumes different roles and identity inorder to obtain information.
2. TWO-MAN SHADOW
= This is easier for the surveillants to fully cover the subject. The method allows the exchange of the positions of the shadowers inorder to avoid discovery. One
shadower will follow behind the subject and the other may either be abreast or on the opposite side of the street. Or following the first shadower.
TEMPERAMENT = a calm, enduring and affable personality. Self-control and self-confidence are a few of his qualities,
PHOTOGRAPHIC MEMORY = he must have a photographic memory because most often, he could not use written notes about his activities and observations. He
must also possess keen power of observation and sound judgment.
1. WORK ASSIGNMENT = If the agent is to be employed as janitor, he must know his work and as such he should appear as such, focusing his mentality and habit to work
assignment. He must avoid language of refinement in order that his educational
background will appear to that of a janitor.
2. SOCIAL ASSIGNMENT = These are places of amusements, such as bars, nightclubs and other places of entertainment where is subject frequents. Criminals throw a major part
of their loot to these places and he must know the hostesses who are girl friends of the criminals. He must know how to drink socially without getting drunk.
3. SUBVERSIVE ORGANIZATIONS = He must know the ideologies of the organizations in order that he could suit his philosophies and actions while inside the said organization.
4. RESIDENTIAL ASSIGNMENT = This concerns the neighborhood of the suspect where he will fit himself as a new resident without generating suspicion. His
purposes are to be friend those who could give information and possibly getting closer to the subject.
5. THE FICTITIOUS PERSONALITY = The preparation should include the fictitious background of the undercover agent. He must discard all papers and affects such as
identification cards, etc. and a new set be issued to him. The agent memorized all the details of his fictitious background.
AUTOPSY
Autopsy came from the Greek word autopsia, meaning "seeing with your own eyes."
After the autopsy was conducted by a medico-legal officer, a report shall be accomplished by him to stating the cause of death of the person. The document or
report made by him is called
INTRODUCTION
Two (2) Main Fields of Tasks in Police Work:
1. Crime Prevention – police operation tasks through program to pre-empt the commission of any infraction or violation of law. This is known as the first defense of police work.
2. Crime Investigation – second defense of police work, when all pre-emptive programs of the organization fails, crime investigation as a function materializes to address the
violation.
Criminal Investigation is an art or process in the identification, location and collection of physical evidences through scientific means in order to establish conviction or
exoneration from an accusation in a court of law. ( O’hara & O’hara – italics supplied)
Criminal Investigation as an art or process therefore endeavors the investigator to do his tasks at his utmost with sincerity and interests to search evidence and establish facts
for an “air tight” case. As the saying goes, “the investigator is the soul of the case, because if he does his home work well, justice is served”.
It has always been said that investigation is dependent on the character of the investigator to do his homework coupled by his qualities, breadth of interest,
training and experience.
Our criminal justice system premised its resolution of cases on existing rigid laws (rule on evidence) and often the dismissal of criminal cases on grounds of
insufficiency of evidence or merely technicalities are blamed on the investigator.
Criminal jurisprudence encourages the investigators to value physical evidences – being a part of circumstantial evidence when offered in court becomes a
corroborative
This research work presents more topics on the third “I” of the three (3) tools of criminal investigation, “INSTRUMENTATION” or “CRIMINALISTICS”- a branch of
forensic science on the characterization of physical evidence. Nonetheless the other two (2) “I’s” (Information and Interview/Interrogation) are presented/discussed in a
simplified manner. It aims to elucidate how this principle proves its worth on the second mode of establishing proof of conviction or exoneration from an accusation through –
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
This piece of work is intended to guide the investigators, students and co-law enforcers but does not claim completeness and as an absolute reference, it suggests
the use of other related references.
I. Introduction - Crime or Criminal Investigation is usually initiated by personal observation or information from a citizen. The initial response is crucial to the
success of an investigation. Although it is popularly believed that cases are won or lost in court, more cases actually are lost during the first hour of the
investigation – the initial response period – than in court.
II. Criminal Investigation defined – an art or process, in the identification, location and scientific collection of evidence for court presentation to establish
conviction or exoneration.
- is the process of discovering, collecting, preparing, identifying and presenting evidence to prove the truth or falsity of an issue in law. – Because no two
crimes are identical, even if they are committed by the same person, each investigation is unique.
Why?
1. Intuition – feeling of truth, unearthed is nothing but the truth of facts
2. Felicity of Inspiration – the breadth of interest common to all, perseverance to do his tasks with consideration to humanity.
3. Chance – an occasion unknowingly to happen, opportunity at the moment
Exceptions:
Crime defined.
An act or omission in violation of a public law forbidding or commanding it; an offense against the state.
Motives – not an element of the crime but is important to infer identity of the accused.
Example of Motives:
Investigation – means to follow – up step-by-step by patient inquiry or observation; to examine and inquire into with care and accuracy; to find out by careful inquisition.
a. Intellectual Characteristics – apply technical knowledge, remain – open-minded and objective and use logic. Knowledge of the elements of crimes, investigative
techniques and willingness to work with other people.
b. Psychological Characteristics – emotionally well balanced, detached, inquisitive, suspecting, discerning, humble, self-disciplined and perseverant.
c. Physical Characteristics – Good health and high energy level are beneficial because the hours spent performing investigative duties can be long and demanding.
Custodial Investigation – It is the skillful questioning of a suspect or a hostile witness to divulge information concerning the crime under investigation.
It is the function or duty of the Criminal Investigator to “make or unmake” the criminal case. His experience, skill, training, knowledge of the law and devotion to
the work are his armor and shield to the tiresome type of work.
He is designed to establish proof of the corpus delicti, designed from the two (2) factors of:
b. Circumstantial Evidence requires that it must consists two or more relevant facts or circumstances that when all are link together an inference of the identity of
the accused can be inferred.
1) Motive
2) Tracing and/or associative evidence, e.g. Latent prints, foot prints, mud, stolen properties recovered in the control and possession of the suspect, transferred
paint to the clothing of the suspect, etc.
3) Testimonies of witnesses
Identity of the Accused established Locating the whereabouts of the accused Collecting/gathering Evidences to prosecute the
accused
1. Direct Testimony by witnesses: through the 1. Testimony of witnesses 1. Relevancy of Evidence
following: - Informers – paid to give information -meaning it must be related to the incident and is
a. Verbal description - Informants – voluntarily providing information not excluded by the rules
b. General Photographs without any monetary consideration. 2. Crime Scene Management –
c. Rogues Gallery - Persons willing and ought to provide information. a. First Responder’s role
d. Artist’s Sketch or cartography 2. Surveillance – the keen observation of a place, - secure and protect
2. Confession – direct acknowledgement of guilt person, associates, activities and armaments. b. Proper crime scene processing
3. Surrender – done to any law enforcer - Usually necessary in the application of a search c. Observance of the Golden Rule in Crime Scene
4. Circumstantial Evidence, like: warrant. don’t’s at the crime scene:
a. Associative or tracing evidence * casing – observation and recording/sketching the M - mutilate
b. Motive avenues of approaches of a territory especially A - alter
c. Opportunity – in a better position before conducting raids. T - touch
d. Declaration and acts indicative of guilt 3. Background Investigation S - search
e. Possession of the fruits of a crime 4. RA 4200 – Anti-wire Tapping Act. Generally, it is O – obliterate
f. 2. Modus Operandi – method or pattern on how illegal to bug unless there is a court order. Unless the crime scene has been documented
the suspect or perpetrator performed the crime. (photographed, sketched and recorded through
* Modus Operandi File – a form consisting of the notes)
different information answering the five W’ and 1 H
(Cardinal principles) d. Maintaining the probative value of physical
Example, it answers: evidences or the so called Chain of Custody of
a. Time of Attack Evidence
b. Classes of preyed victim 3. Factors on Legal Searches and Seizures
c. Interest or types of interest 4. Must establish the linkage of the crime
d. Associates of the group scene/pieces of physical evidence with the suspect
e. Method of the attack/entrance 5. Court Duties
f. Means of attack/weapons
g. Means of transportation/getaway
h. Peculiarities/physical descriptions
i. Mannerisms or Idiosyncrasies
5. Police Line – up – must be at least 7 – 10 persons
possibly of the same height, body built
6. Vanity – a self-conceited act tantamount to guilt.
b. Initial Response
1) Preparation/Planning – coordination, equipment, contact attached personnel
2) Weather condition, transportation
3) Security of the crime scene
d. Consider Assistance of Police Laboratories – Forensic Science or Criminalistics – applies physical and biological sciences and technology to examining physical
evidence.
III. The Crime Scene – the whereabouts of the Elusive Physical Evidence
1) Mental Reconstruction – it is the keen/careful observation of the nature, conditions or appearance of materials and objects at the crime scene in order to infer
an assumption of what crime may have happened. Possibly, the investigator can also infer an assumption of the prior condition or situation of the place before such
events.
> Role of Reason: - a tests to the ability & decision making of the investigator
(1) Inductive Reasoning – the assumption may arose from specific situation/condition to general situation.
(2) Deductive Reasoning – the assumption may arose from general situation to specific situation.
> General Knowledge and Interests – The efficiency of an investigator is commensurate with his general knowledge. To acquire this breadth of knowledge, the investigator must
develop, not necessarily a highly intellectual capacity, BUT a keen sense of observation of persons and things because “only people commit crimes, but they invariably do so
through the medium of things.” – Atty. Diosdado Lapina.
2) Physical Reconstruction – the reconstruction of the crime scene is through the direction of an eyewitness. e.g. ocular inspection and re-enactment.
c. Documentation Processes:
(a). Advantage – they can be taken immediately, accurately represent the crime scene and evidence, create interest and increase attention to testimony.
(b) Disadvantage – they are not selective, do not show actual distances, may be distorted and may be damaged by mechanical errors in shooting or processing
© Progression -
(1) Clockwise progression;
(2) From large objects to small objects
(3) Long-range or general view; medium or overview; and close-range or close up.
(d) Microphotography, laser beam photography, Ultra-violet photography
(e) Admissibility of Photographs – material, relevant, competent photographs
Kinds of Sketch:
a. Rough Sketch – the sketch prepared by the investigator at the crime scene. Known to be the original sketch because it shall be the source of the finished sketch.
b. Final Sketch – or known as the office or final sketch because it is prepared at the office purposely for court presentation. It may be prepared with the aid of a
draftsman provided it shall be under the close supervision and direction of the peace officer who initially prepared the rough sketch.
(a) Title – identity of victim, place, time, date of incident, investigator and witnesses
(b) Time of Arrival & weather condition
(c) Compass Direction – for orientation
(d) Essential Items/Specific Details – relevant/corpus delicti
(e) Measurements – standard equipment
(f) Legend – explanation of symbols to identify objects
(g) Scale of Proportion
(h) Signature of Sketcher and witness(es)
Surveying methods
a) Rectangular Coordinates
b) Polaris Coordinates
c) Triangulation Method
d) Transecting Base lines
e) Compass Coordinates
1) Relevant facts
2) Requisites of Notes
3) Significance or importance
4) Report Writing
(a) Spot Reports
(b) Initial investigations
© Progress Reports
(d) Final Investigation Report
3. Notes Taking and Reports – investigative notes are permanent written record of the facts of a case to be used in further investigation, in writing reports and in
prosecuting the case. Record all information that helps to answer the questions: Who? What? Where? When? How? And Why?
Write notes – briefly but complete, legibly, accurately, specifically, factual, clear and abbreviated notes that are understandable to others.
Original notes are legally advisable in court, and officers may use them to refresh their memories. Officers should take to court only those notes that
pertain to the particular case.
Types of Reports:
Arrest – the taking of a person into custody in the manner authorized by law for the purpose of presenting that person before the court to answer for the commission of a crime.
Nightcap Provision – As a general Arrest Warrants shall be enforce during day time, however, when the court endorses the warrant with a written statement that the arrest may
be made at night, this is commonly referred to as nightcap provision.
Reasonable Force – is the amount of force a prudent person would use in similar circumstances.
b. Off-duty Arrest
Field Identification - is on the scene identification of a suspect by the victim of or witnesses to a crime. Field Identification must be made within minutes after the
commission of the crime.
c. Developing a Suspect
1. Information provided by victims, witnesses and other persons likely to know about the crime.
a. Mug Shots
b. Cartography or Artist Sketch or Portrait Parle
c. Rogues Gallery
Surveillance – is the covert, discreet observation of people and places for the purpose of obtaining information concerning the identities or activities of subjects.
Log – chronological records of activities that took place in the establishment under surveillance.
Subject – is who or what is observed. It can be a person, place, property, vehicle, group of people, organization or object.
Methods of Surveillance:
1. Stationary Surveillance – also referred to as Fixed and Stakeout Surveillance – is used when you know or suspect that a person is at or will come to a known location when
you suspect that stolen goods are to be dropped or when informants have told you that a crime is going to be committed.
Forms :
3. Convoy – a guard employed by the subject who stays at a reasonable distance to watch or safeguard his back against an enemy.
4. Wire Tapping or bugging – electronic surveillance by tapping a subject’s telephone..
5. Undercover Assignments or Roping – form of investigation in which the investigator assumes a different and unofficial identity in order to obtain information.
Selling Crimes – are illegal activities such as drugs, alcohol, pornographic literature, stolen goods, frauds, contraband, or black market operations.
6. Entrapment – is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the
trickery, persuasion or fraud of the officer. The criminal conduct was a mere “product of the creative activity,” of the officer.
e. R a i d s - is a planned, organized operation based on the element of surprise. The objectives of a raid are to recover stolen property, seize evidence or arrest a
suspect. A raid must be the result of a hot pursuit or under the authority of a no-knock arrest or search warrant.
a) Initial contact
(1) Investigator identifies himself
(2) Inform subject is under arrest
(3) Aware/alert subject maybe dangerous
b) Investigator’s/operative’s conduct
(1) Be natural and pleasant but forceful and aggressive
(2) Dominate the situation
(3) Voice must command authority
(4) Demand prompt and absolute obedience
(5) Avoid profane language
d) Without Warrant
(1)Arresting officer shall inform the person to be arrested his authority and cause of arrest
(2) Except under those instances so mentioned by law, where necessary action or force shall be employed.
B. Search – is an examination of an individual’s person, house, papers or effects, or other buildings and premises to discover contraband or some evidence of guilt to be used in
the prosecution of a criminal action.
1. Search Warrant – is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a Judge and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to
search for personal property described therein and to bring it before the court.
8. Types of Searches
1. Objectives:
a) Effect an apprehension
b) Obtain evidence of illegal activity by surprising the offenders in flagrante delicto
c) Recover stolen property
RATIONALE:
The crime scene provides the intelligent and careful investigator leads of any type of offenses committed and therefore it should be protected and secured from
any disturbances; this however, shall not preclude victims from being retrieve for immediate medical attention. In these instances, careful procedures must be observed and
disturbances in the retrieval operation cannot be discarded or avoided but it should be limited to the instance or situation as required.
Securing the crime scene is a major responsibility of the first officer to arrive. Everything of a non-emergency nature is delayed until the scene is protected.
Any police officer who first arrives at the crime scene shall endeavor to protect
and secure the same as follows:
a. Cordon off the crime scene with whatever available materials like ropes, straws, human barricade, police line if available, etc.
b. Evacuate injured persons to the nearest hospital or clinic;
c. Prepare to take the dying declaration of severely injured person, if any;
d. Explain to people gathered around the significance of protecting the crime scene and possibly securing the physical evidences;
e. Prevent entry/exit of persons within the cordoned area; and
f. Prepare to brief the investigators of the situation upon their arrival.
Question: Can the first responder photograph the crime scene and possibly vulnerable pieces of evidence?
Answer: He can, provided his main responsibility of protecting and securing the crime scene is insured.
1. Three (3) Scientific Divisions – subjects require the study of science and mathematics before practical training in the laboratory, namely:
a. Chemistry
b. Physics or Physical Identification
c. Biological Science or Medico-legal
a. Questioned Document
b. Firearms Identification
c. Latent or Fingerprint Examination
d. Forensic Photography
e. Lie Detection or Polygraph
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
The tasks include alcohol analysis, toxicology, narcotics testing, firearms discharge residues (GPR), paraffin cast, identification of paint chips, chemical development
of latent prints, and all types of analysis that use electronic instruments.
3) Toxicology – is the study of poisons and their action on the living organism. It is a very complex science that is divided into two (2) areas:
Trace analysis involves the examination, identification and evaluation of numerous types of physical evidence collected in criminal investigations. The studies
conducted by this unit would include the microscopic examination of slides taken from rape victims during the pelvic examination conducted by a physician. The microscopic
examination and comparison of fibers, hair, tool marks, pry marks and wood chips are other examples of the studies conducted in this unit. The shoe and tire prints and imprints
obtained at crime scenes by investigators or criminalists, as well as soil samples, debris, paint, glass and plastic fragments collected during the investigation.
a. Serology – Conducts all ABO typing of blood, semen and other body fluids.
1) Presumptive Test (Benzidine TMB Reagent) – It does not establish the presence of blood; it is used as a screening test to determine if a stain may be blood; if
not eliminate suspicion of the stain.
2) Confirmatory test (Hemin) – This is used to determine the presence of hemoglobin in a suspected blood stain.
4) Blood grouping – Blood grouping test will establish which of the four major groups a stain belongs in (i.e., O, A, B, or AB). Blood groupings involve the agglutination, or
clumping, of erythrocytes (red blood cells).
Preliminary Test (Florence) – This test is used to determine the presence of choline. Seminal plasma is one of the richest sources of choline. A strong positive
reaction indicates the stain may contain semen, though this is not a specific test as a positive reaction may also be produced by tissue extracts.
Confirmatory Test (Microscopic Examination) – The conclusive identification of a stain as semen depends on the presence of male reproductive cells
(spermatozoa) in the stain. This is determined by microscope examination of the stain.
c) Toxicological Analysis – of human body fluids and organs, including pathological studies of tissue to aid in determining the cause of death, is normally a responsibility of the
coroner or medical examiner.
Functions:
a. Conduct comparison and examination of forged, altered or questioned documents
b. Examines and compares handwriting exemplars (samples) with handwriting on questioned documents
c. Exemplars made on typewriters and check protectors for comparison with questioned documents
d. Restores or deciphers altered, obliterated or erased writing
e. Physical matching of cut or torn paper of various types
f. Examine and compare forged documents such as:
FIREARMS IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
This Division conducts firearms identification examinations, comparisons of firearms and bullets, studies to determine trigger pull, operation of safety devices,
alteration or modification of weapons or any condition of the weapon that might cause accidental fire or make it unsafe.
Functions
1) Searches for, develops, photographs, and lifts latent prints at the scene of investigation
2) Compares suspect’s prints with latent prints obtained from crime scenes
3) Takes plaster casts of footprints, tire tracks, etc.
4) Conducts fingerprint examination of various items of evidence (e.g. guns and other weapons, papers, glass, metal, etc.)
5) A service available to investigators is a computer terminal that records fingerprints electronically, without ink or smudges.
Through the use of Forensic Photography, many items of physical evidence, that are the prime incriminating factors in cases, are graphically depicted.
Services Performed
POLYGRAPH DIVISION
Instrumental in the detection of deception. There is no instrument that detects lies. The instrument commonly called a lie detector is actually a scientific diagnostic
instrument (similar to the electrocardiography) and is referred to in many police circles as the polygraph.
Pieces of physical evidence are always present in a crime and this can be proven by the “rolling of sleeves” attitude of an investigator. Physical evidence recovered
in the crime scene is critical in the prosecution of the case in court. With the advent of new technologies or science, the probative value of physical evidence or “corpus delicti”
of a crime, analyzed scientifically has gained their admissibility before our courts.
Thus, the Scene of Crime Operation was conceived to possibly address these problems. The idea of enhancing scene of crime operation was conceived in the last
quarter of 1995 by the PNP Crime Laboratory to address these deficiencies and to assist police investigators in terms of scientific approaches in investigating criminal cases,
especially heinous crimes. The PNP Crime Laboratory has acquired new and modern equipment to boost its capabilities in scientific investigation
A. OBJECTIVES OF SOCO
Not all crime incidents are for Scene of Crime Operation. The necessity of the technical expertise applies only to heinous crimes where careful scrutiny is necessary
more so when the investigator is faced with a blank wall. The field investigators through the statement of witnesses and related collected pieces of physical evidence can handle
light offenses. This now shows the importance of SOCO why it is involved only on heinous crimes. These crimes are:
a. Murder
b. Homicide
c. Robbery with force upon things
d. Rape with Homicide
e. Arson
f. Other heinous and/or sensational cases as required and directed by higher Headquarters.
Each SOCO Team shall be composed of, but not limited to the following, depending on the nature of the case:
1. Team Leader
2. Assistant Team Leader
3. Photographer and photographic Log Recorder
4. Sketcher/Measurer
5. Evidence Recorder/Custodian
6. Evidence Recovery Personnel
7. Driver/Security
The graphic design in the form of a question mark did not originate from a sudden blaze of ingenuity, but emerged from a long and patient mental gymnastics on
how to transform the idea, that can guide the investigator in the marketplace of reality.
At the crime scene, the investigator stands majestically, which gives rise to extravagant expectation by the aggrieved party that justice will prevail. However, when
he fails to solve the case, it could cause disenchantment not only to the victim but to the organization as a whole. Like any mortal, the investigator is not infallible. As a
man of flesh, he is susceptible to succumb to mental exhaustion and physical fatigue.
Thus, the salient feature of the investigation is overlooked and the real issue becomes obscured and sometimes wantonly sullied. Hence, the investigator must be
reminded that his role begins from the gestation stage of investigation and only ends either in the conviction of the accused or absolution of the innocent.
PROCEDURES:
1. Arrival at the Crime Scene. - Establish preparation, complete equipment apparatus, companions, how were you able to arrive at crime scene, how fast and the
time, date and weather condition upon arrival at scene of crime. Purpose: Enlighten the court the difference between table investigation and actual crime scene
investigation. What is its significance in court litigation.
2. Evaluation of the Crime Scene. - Your assessment of the crime scene, was there destruction, is the crime scene in its original state? Was the condition recorded?
Were there any technical personalities involved?
3. Protection of the Crime Scene. - Cordoning the are, who were the persons allowed, how were the evidences protected and preserved? How was the crime scene
released?
5. Photographing the Crime Scene. - What were photographed? Who took them? Know the parts and other related information about camera. Significant legal
requirements of photographs.
7. Searching. - Method used in the search. Equipment used and how was the procedure observed.
Locard Principle, “Whenever two things touch each other, there is always a transfer of material from one to the other. Any contact between the criminal and the
victim or the crime scene will leave trace evidence on both”.
Jones Principle, “A number of individual similarities that are each of low evidentiary value, yet which all point to the same conclusion, can be just as important
evidence as a fingerprint.”
8. Collection of Evidence.- Basic tools used. How was the crime scene processed? (Photograph, Sketch, measured in relation to points of reference). Was there
adequate evidence samples?
9. Preservation of Evidence.- Each piece of evidence in a separate container with markings and properly sealed or covered
10. Verbal Interrogation. - Questioning of witness/es, person around (include policeman) and suspect/s. Observed the legal requirements and if possible segregating
witnesses.
11. Written Interrogation. - Constitutional Rights, basic format of affidavits or statements, witnesses and environment of investigation room.
12. Technical analysis.- All pieces of evidence transmitted to proper agencies/units, “chain of custody of evidence”, and the results furnished to the investigating
agency.
13. Inter-agency linkages. - Coordination and contact with other agencies. “Need to know policy.”
17. Court Trial. - Subpoena was received. Properly groomed and in uniform. Preparedness to testify in court.
To investigators, only the learned with facts and figures can survive the battle of nerve in judicial activism.
THE M-FACTOR
ACCORDING TO VOLLMER, “The police should possess the wisdom of Solomon, the kindness of Job; the leadership of Moses, the strategy of Alexander, the great
faith of David, the diplomacy of Lincoln and the reliance of the carpenter of Nazareth. “But this is an “Utopian” dream; an impossible dream, but an obtainable
obsession, if an investigator possesses these attributes, then there will be no perfect crime.
The M-Factor is a metaphysical characteristic. It can be developed and internalized through years of enculturation. In effect, it affixes an indelible
mark of quality to the investigator; manifested when he can managed time and resources, personal deportment, facility of language and novel approach in solving
crimes.
These vital nutrients of M-Factor indispensable to the moral nourishment of the investigator are:
a. MANAGERSHIP.- managerial skill, able to demonstrate manager ship of risks to stand what is right. As the wisest among the philosophers said, “ Only
the dead have seen the end war”.
b. ABILITY.- It is the sum of total of skills and exceptional degree of competence in the investigative domain.
c. CHARISMA.- it is a special magnetic personality and charm; on obsession of many but the natural gift of a few. Charisma implies simplicity of words,
action and deportment of the investigators, which have natural attraction for people.
d. ADAPTABILITY.- Rare traits that brings one’s act, behavior or mental state in harmony with his environment. A conveniently ableness to adjust to all
seasons and reasons of man. Thus, the adaptable investigator never finds himself” a square peg in a round hole”.
e. SINCERITY.- An abstract value and attribute marked with genuineness of spirit, strict adherence to promise and supreme honesty in the true calling of
the police profession. It denotes sensitivity to the needy and sufferings of crime victims.
f. INTEGRITY.- In any position of respectability where trust and fidelity are sine qua non, integrity stands at the apex of the hierarchical pyramid of
values. For integrity cannot be earned overnight. It is the fruit reaped through years of dedicated zeal and forbearance. As articulated by a learned
justice, in the case entitled Gatchitorena vs Almeda, “Public office gains continuing prestige as long as the men occupying the position are
courageous, upright and immune to doubt, suspicion and corruption.”
g. ACCURACY.- Many investigation reports which lack theoretical clarity are usually drowned in cosmetic verbiage and ended in colossal blunder during
litigation.
CONCLUSION:
Today, by reason of contrived climate of prejudice, the investigator has seemingly sunk into the depths of decadence through sheer arrogance,
brutality, corruptibility and incompetence. No amount of cosmetic surgery can hide this ugly truth. If unabated, these will further effect the distancing of the
police and the masses.
Amidst such apparent public alienation, can the investigator rise against this societal conflict and panacea? This is now the challenge addressed to the
police administrators- to produce a new breed of investigator, the genesis of a total investigator. The world of investigation is not for the weak of mind, but
for the stout of heart. The M-Factor, therefore, is an abstract badge of honor of the investigator that should be worn proudly.
It is difficult to educate investigators with perceived basis between what the preachers preach and how to depart from the cocoon of status quo. This
only lay credence to the century-old adage that “wolf only change its furs, but not his habits.”
When value clash, it is only the lazy mince who finds it easy to take sides and to untie the knot with ease, but not the visionary nor the learned. This is
the thrust of this writing, to cross the information highway of Criminalistics and to jog along its global avenue and not just stroll its barriotic lane. Without
this vision, we shall woke-up one morning, to find the streets littered with trails of blood and marble of crosses.
Said it all by common experience and observation, the ten most notorious inadvertence of investigators that refuses to submerge from the ocean
floors of errors, are:
1. That Criminalistics is only for the Criminalists and not to the investigator.
Today, Criminalistics is now a towering monument in the landscape of investigation. It becomes the cornerstone and citadel of investigator as
treasure house of science for bridging crimes to criminals thousand miles apart.
2. That in the absence of witness solution is nil. Finding no evidence or witness should not be viewed as hopeless, but as a challenge. For there is no
perfect crime only imperfect investigators.
3. That there is no crime in the absence of corpus delicti. Is this correct? This conclusion is an indicia that one is suffering from legal vacuity. It is a sin to
prejudice without basis in fact and in law. Literally, corpus delicti means the body of the crime but that is not all, pieces of physical evidence are
included.
4. That length of service is not a guarantee for excellence. A tree does not make a forest, nor swallow a summer, neither a man is an island. This
egocentric syndrome is detestable for it is tantamount to a sin of mental dishonesty. “Seniority could mean senility.” How many cases were dismissed
due to scientific malnutrition on criminalistics is too deafening to be ignored.
5. That grandstanding and showmanship be tabooed.- It is the fundamental rule, that all gathered evidence should be handled with care, to protect its
evidentiary value against erosion form elements from the time of retrieval to the laboratory.
6. That premature determination of offense committed.- Wounds per se without criminalistics findings can not determine the nature of the crime
committed. This premature conclusion is the common sin of homicide investigator, especially on victims of gunshot wounds.
8. That suspect’s premature arrest frown-upon with disfavor.- The temptation to name names due to public pressure at the expense of the innocent is
unpardonable sin.
9. That criminalistics and investigators are inseparable partners in investigation.- It complements and supplements each other.
10. That only truth and not truth decay- Truth is non-negotiable statement, for it is a sin to lie. But how many investigators fall-prey to the onerous
pressure from the sit of power and blinded by the sparkle of worldly wealth and were forced to weave the unpardonable lie, is reeking with
extravagant truth, but difficult to reverse..
RATIONALE:
Luminaries in the field of criminal investigation have always advocated the principle that a crime scene will always give leads to the identity of the perpetrator of a
crime; pieces of evidence found at the crime scene will link or tie perpetrators to the crime. It is evident therefore, that approaches in crime scene search methods and
investigative procedures in its management must be carefully observed and practiced. Testimonies can hardly stand alone in the absence of corroborating evidence such as
object or real evidences.
CONCEPT:
The processing of a crime scene requires careful analysis, collection, handling, and preservation of pieces of evidence. The availability of the different strategies in
processing a crime scene calls for case to case basis principle, hence, proper management techniques in order not to defeat the very purpose of investigation must be done.
Search – is an examination of a person’s house or other buildings or premises or of the person for the purpose of discovering contraband or illicit or stolen property or some
evidence of guilt to be used in prosecuting a criminal action with which a person is charged.
(a) A search warrant has been issued – specify place and things to be searched. General and Scatted Search Warrants are inadmissible.
> Plain Feel/Touch Evidence or “Pat-down Searches” – the plain feel exception is a legitimate extension of the plain view doctrine.
a. Exclusionary Rule – established that courts may not accept evidence that was obtained by unreasonable search and seizure, regardless of its relevance to the
case.
b. Fruits of a Poisonous Tree Doctrine – established that evidence obtained as a result of an earlier illegality must be excluded from trial.
c. Good Faith Doctrine – established that illegally obtained evidence may be admissible if the police were truly not aware that they were violating the suspect’s
constitutional rights.
Note: After search – detailed inventory receipts, copy of which shall be furnished to the owner.
d. Crime Scene Search – a successful crime-scene search locates, identifies and preserves all evidence present.
a. Establish that a crime was committed and what the specific crime was;
b. Establish when the crime was committed
c. Identify who committed the crime
d. Explain how the crime was committed
e. Suggest why the crime was committed
4. Organizing the Crime-Scene Search = Organizing a search includes dividing the duties, selecting a search pattern, assigning personnel and equipment and giving instructions.
a. Selection of a Search Method: To insure a thorough and complete inspection for possible evidence. A systematic method of searching the area surrounding the
crime scene must be employed. The particular method employed will be dictated by the following factors:
1) Locale: - The location of the scene will influence the method of search to be used.
(a) Building Searches – always think of safeties. The greatest concern will be adequately sorting evidence from non-evidence.
(b) Outdoor Areas: - Weather and deteriorating light may necessitate a more rapid search when crime scene is outdoors. Outdoor areas maybe difficult to mark
off, since there are often few natural boundaries. Trace evidence (e.g. dust, hair, fibers) is exceedingly difficult to retrieve due to obstructions from vegetation or the wind.
(c) Vehicle Searches – Upholstery and carpet materials provide a fruitful source of trace evidence in vehicle searches. First search the area around the vehicle and
the exterior. Finally, search the interior along one side from front to back, and then return along the other side to the front.
2) Number of personnel available – the more persons available to process a crime scene, the more rapidly the search can be conducted.
3) Types of Objects Sought – The type and size of the objects sought at a scene affect the form of search. Larger objects are more rapidly observed and require less
time and personnel unlike in minute objects like fibers, prints, etc.
4) Speed Desired – Appropriate time is required considering the nature and kind of evidence that will be recognized and collected.
b. Search Patterns or methods – it shall be dependent on personnel available, time limits imposed by weather, lighting conditions, terrain and other circumstances
to consider.
1) Strip Method – It consists of processing the area by walking back and forth, viewing an approximately three to four-strip with each pass. As one strip is
completed, the investigator moves to the next parallel strip. If several searchers are used, they walk side by side in processing the crime scene.
Disadvantages:
a. The method may be difficult to utilize over rugged terrain, or where the crime scene is ill-defined;
b. The method is potentially inefficient, because that fact that most scene have a major point of impact (e.g. the body in a homicide case) around which the bulk of
the evidence is likely to e found.
2) Grid Search Method – It consists of two strip searches conducted over the same area at right angles to one another.
Advantage: Grid search in the area place a premium on thoroughness, since each spot in the area is examined twice.
Disadvantages:
a. The search takes twice as long as a strip search; and
b. Objects found on the second pass may actually have been left by the searchers on the first pass.
3) Spiral Search Method – A clockwise circle is begun at the major impact point of the scene and the searcher circles that point at an ever increasing radius.
Advantages:
a. The impact point of the scene is the focal point of investigation; and
b. The boundaries of the relevant search are more easily defined, since the investigator will eventually reach a point when no more evidence is being discovered.
Disadvantages:
a. In order to reach the point of impact, the investigator must track across (and eventually contaminate) a portion of the crime scene;
b. The point of impact is not always at the geographic center of the crime scene; and
c. The spiral method cannot easily be used with multiple searchers.
4) Zone or Quadrant Method - The area to be searched is divided into unit zones and each unit is then processed individually as a separate crime scene
Advantages:
a. A zone search aids in organizing a large or complex crime scene;
b. Numerous personnel can be used without getting in each other’s way.
Disadvantages:
a. A zone search can be used only when the crime scene permits a sub-dividing; and
b. If used too often, supervision and coordination of the units may be difficult.
5) Wheel (Inward or Outward) Search – It is the least effective, particularly in a large area. The tendency is to concentrate on the center and hence, to miss the
evidence to the outside.
* Techniques in searching:
5. Physical Evidence – objects or materials searched, identified and collected at the crime scene significant and relevant to a particular incident or event. It is anything real or
material – it has substance – that helps to establish the facts of the case. They are referred to as:
a. Trace Evidence. Direct evidence establishes proof of a fact without any other evidence.
b. Evidence established by law is called Prima-facie Evidence.
c. Evidence that merely tends to incriminate a person, such as a suspect’s footprints found near the crime scene, is called Circumstantial Evidence.
d. Exculpatory Evidence – these are pieces of physical evidence that would clear one of blame, for example, having a blood type different from that of blood found at a
murder scene.
1. Corpus Delicti Evidence – establishes that a crime has in fact been committed.
2. Associative Evidence – those that links a suspect with the crime.
Processing Physical Evidence includes discovering, recognizing and examining it; collecting, recording and identifying it; packaging, conveying and storing it; exhibiting it in
court; and disposing of it when the case is closed.
Physical Evidence must be material, relevant, and competent. To determine what is evidence, consider first the type of crime that appears to have been
committed. Then looks for any objects that are unrelated or foreign to the scene, that are unusual in location or number, that have been damaged or broken or whose
relation to other objects suggests a pattern that fits the crime.
Standard of Comparison – is an object, measure or model with which evidence is compared to determine whether both came from the same source.
Packaging:
1. Plastic Bags – does not “breathe”, best because may cause condensation to form.
2. Brown-paper bags or envelope – used especially for clothing.
3. Boxes – for large and heavy objects.
4. To preserve immovable items at the scene, use photographs, modeling clay, moulage, silicon and other impression-making materials.
7. Transporting Evidence – Personal delivery, registered mail, insured parcel post, air express, are the legal ways to transport evidence. Always specify that the person receiving
the evidence is to sign for it. How evidence should be transported depends on its size and type and the distance involved. Use the fastest method available. If the package is
mailed, a “return receipt” should be requested.
Frequently examined physical evidence includes fingerprints, voiceprints, shoe and tire impressions, bite marks, tools and tool marks, weapons and ammunition,
glass, soils and minerals, body fluids (including blood), hairs and fibers, safe insulation, rope and tape, drugs, documents and laundry and dry-cleaning marks.
What to be examined?
1. Class Characteristics – these are the features that place an item into a specific category; e.g., size and shape of a tool mark may indicate that the tool used was a
screwdriver rather than a pry bar.
2. Individual Characteristics – the features that distinguish one item from another of the same type; e.g., chips and wear patterns in the blade of a screwdriver may
have marks that are distinguishable from those of any other screwdriver.
8. What is AFIS? It means automated fingerprint identification system – an electronic fingerprinting system that can digitize fingerprint information to produce inkless
fingerprints. The latent fingerprints are scanned and converted into an electronic image that is stored in a data base for rapid retrieval.
a. Voiceprints – is a graphic record of an individual’s voice characteristics made by a sound spectrograph which records the energy patterns emitted by speech.
b. Bite Marks – Teeth impressions are found in partially eaten food, they can be cast in the same way shoe and tire-thread impressions are. Dental impression material is
preferred because of its fine texture. Saliva samples should be taken using a swab before bite marks are cast.
c. Toneline – is a black photographic outline of the perimeter of a bite mark that can be compared directly with models of an individual’s teeth.
d. Tools and Tool marks – Identify each suspect tool with a string tag. Wrap it separately and pack it in a strong box for sending to the laboratory. A tool mark – is an impression
left by a tool on a surface. It provides leads as to the size and type of tool that made it. A tool mark is compared with a standard of comparison impression rather than with the
tool itself.
Photograph weapons and then identify them with a string tag. Unload guns. Record the serial number on the string tag and in your notes. Label the packing container
“Firearms.” Identify bullets on the base, cartridges on the outside of the case near the bullet end and cartridge cases on the inside near the open end. Put ammunition in cotton
or soft paper and ship to the laboratory. Never send live ammunition through the mail; use a common carrier.
f. Glass
Label glass fragments using adhesive tape on each piece. Wrap each piece separately in cotton to avoid chipping and place in a strong box marked “fragile” for
sending to the laboratory.
g. Spectrographic Analysis – can determine the elements of the glass, even of extremely small fragments.
h. Soils and Minerals
Put one pound of comparison soil into a container, identifying it on the outside of the container. Collect evidence soil the same way. Seal both containers to
prevent loss, wrap them and send them to the laboratory. Soils vary greatly in color, particle size, minerals and chemical constituents. Take sufficient samples directly from and
around the suspected area at perhaps 5 to 100 foot intervals, depending on the scene.
i. X-ray Diffraction – chemical analysis of soil generally examined by density to determine mineral content and by microscope.
j. Ropes, Strings and Tapes - It can provide leads in identifying suspects and in linking suspects with the crime. Put labeled rope, twine and string in a container. Put tapes on
waxed paper or cellophane and then place them in a container.
k. Drugs – identification kits can be used to make a preliminary analysis of a suspicious substance, but the full analysis must be done at the laboratory. Put liquid drugs in a bottle
and attach a label. Put powdered and solid drugs in a pill or powder box and identify the same way.
l. Documents – Do not touch documents with your bare hands. Place them in a cellophane envelope and then in a manila envelope, and identify them on the outside.
Ultraviolet Light – used to detect invisible laundry marks. Submit the entire garment to the laboratory, identifying it with a string tag or directly on the garment.
Blood can be identified as animal or human. It is most useful in eliminating suspects. Age, race or sex cannot be determined from blood samples, but DNA analysis or DNA
o. Examining Hair – The hair shaft has a cuticle on the outside consisting of overlapping scales that always point toward the tip; a cortex consisting of elongated cells and the
medulla – the center of the hair – consisting of variably shaped cells. Variations in these structures make comparisons and identifications possible.
p. DNA Profiling
DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid, an organic substance in the nucleus of all living cells that provides the genetic code determining a person’s individual characteristics. DNA is a basic
part of the cell’s chromosomes and can be used to create a genetic fingerprint to identify a person. It is found in body fluids, hair and tissues.
DNA PROFILING – can be done on blood, hair, saliva, semen, indeed cells from almost any part of the body. It uses materials from which chromosomes are made to identify
individuals positively. Except for identical twins, no two individuals have the same DNA structure.
Probative Evidence – evidence that is vital for the investigation or prosecution of a case, tending to prove or actually proving guilt or innocence.
a. Blood
b. Semen
c. Other Types
1) Tissues/Bones/Teeth: Although small amounts of evidence have provided enough DNA for analysis, the amount that will be needed is unpredictable
and depends on many factors including age and concentration sample.
Specimens should be collected and dried as soon as possible to avoid bacterial contamination.
2) Wet Specimens – Quick-dry using a hair dryer on the cool setting. For large amounts of material, use a large floor fan. Absorb wet specimen onto sterile gauze.
100% cotton or Q-Tips and then dry.
3) Dry Specimens – Scrape dried specimen from permanent surfaces. Cut dried specimen out from large areas. Package whole items if manageable.
d. Packaging Specimens
Drying specimens isn’t enough. They must be kept as free from moisture as possible.
1) Small Items – Place the collected specimen in a zip-lock bag. Squeeze the air out of the bag.
2) Larger Items – Use paper bags for large items and tape them closed.
e. Storing Collected Evidence. – Heat can destroy DNA, therefore, if the evidence is not sent for DNA Analysis within a few days, store the packaged evidence as directed.
1) Short – term storage (less than 30 days). - Store in freezer. If freezer is not available, refrigerate evidence. Store at room temperature for only 1 – 2 days.
Send evidence and exemplar samples, from the victim and suspect(s), properly labeled, together with a written description of the specimens. Include any other
important or relevant facts concerning the case and origin of the sample(s) for the forensic scientist. Send samples via an overnight carrier. The sender is responsible for
following chain of custody.
CONCEPT:
Presently, the judiciary together with the hierarchy of the Philippine National Police has given credence more to the value of PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. At the outset,
these inanimate objects are referred to as “SILENT WITNESSES” because they are addressed to the senses of the court. Hence, the role of the different disciplines on police
sciences is necessary to interpret the meaning of the markings, impressions or striations embedded or marked on these pieces of collected or gathered evidence. Result of
examinations are testified, interpreted and argued before the magistrate, who has the ultimate discretion whether or not to consider or accept the weight and probative value
of the physical or object evidence as elaborated by the testimonies of the examiners or experts.
Guided from the principles laid down by the following authors on the subject, namely:
O’Hara and O’Hara, in his book “Fundamentals of Criminal Investigation”, he stressed that “Human Beings are creators of Habits.” He claimed that a
suspect/perpetrator though how careful he maybe, even it needs a rehearsal before doing his criminal act, will and will unconsciously leave traces or marks at the scene.
Dr. Paul L. Kirk said in his book, “Crime Investigation”, “The success of most investigation begins at the crime scene.”
Kenneth W Goddard, in his book, “Crime Scene Investigation,” also suggested that, “ There is a need to reconstruct the scene of the crime to tie the suspect(s) to
either the crime scene or the victim(s).”
In one sensational decisions of the Supreme Court, it had considerably weighed or favored the probative value of pieces of physical evidences offered in evidence
over the testimonies of witnesses. The court empathically favored the value of physical evidence relying on the principle, “res ipso luquitor” (the thing speaks for itself),
provided however, that it must past the test of unquestionable “Chain of Custody of Evidence.” The justifications of these principles shall be discussed in the next topics.
GUIDELINES
The Crime Scene - is the locale within the immediate vicinity of the occurrence wherein evidence may be found. Its significance are:
From the managerial and administrative viewpoints, a crime scene search is affected by two (2) environments – INTERNAL and EXTERNAL.
Internal – environment is best described as being all factors, which exists within an agency that can affect the quality of scene searches. Many aspects such as
funding, training of personnel, proper equipment or facilities, command structure and planning programs directly contribute to the success or failure of searches.
External – environmental factors – are those, which exist apart from a department and generally, include societal changes and pressures. These factors may have
immense impact on the operations and administrations of the investigative work and therefore the investigators must be properly postured and careful in handling properly the
situation.
Walk-through is done by carefully entering the crime scene and keenly detecting, observing and visualizing the nature, condition, appearances and positions of the
crime scene.
1. Visualization of what the scene looked like before the crime occurred;
2. Visualization of what took place during the crime;
3. Identify all evidence potentials; prints, weapons, etc. and perishable evidence;
4. Identify laboratory service and other equipment needs – barricades, lights, etc.
5. Identify manpower needs; and
6. Establishing a practical path through the scene, that affords the lowest risk factor in terms of damaging or destroying evidence.
3. Physical Evidence – are objects or materials searched, found and collected at the crime scene that are supposed to be competent and material to the case under
investigation.
The guiding principle that must be borne in mind is, “Nothing should be
touched or moved until it has been identified, measured, printed or photographed.”
1) It is the decisive factor in determining guilt or innocence of a suspect. By the testimonies of an expert witness.
2) Can be a material aid in locating the perpetrator of a crime and because it narrows down the search of suspects.
3) Establish corpus delicti and scene of incident.
How?
a) Determine the type of wound inflicted, which can prove the search for the weapon used.
b) Interviews of persons knowledgeable or who has information about the incident.
c) Search and collection of related pieces of physical evidence
d) Personal observation of the surroundings and the condition, appearances of the scene.
1) Proper Recognition – the investigator must be knowledgeable of the elements or requisites of the crime committed in order that he/she can search and
gathered appropriate or relevant evidences; may it be associating and/or tracing evidence.
3) Proper Collection and Identification – it is the use of systematic/chronological, legal and complete procedures in the collection process. Thereafter, placing the
items in an appropriate separate materials or containers to secure the evidences.
> Insufficiency of sample and failure to supply standards of comparison and controls are the most common errors. The employment of improper collection
techniques results also in a failure to realize the full probative value of the evidence. Factors to consider includes:
4) Proper Control, Handling and Preservation – Marking, tagging and/or labeling the pieces of collected evidences accordingly.
> Most organic matters change in character through natural decomposition and unless preventive measures are taken, their probative value is destroyed. Factors
such as time (weather) and temperature must be considered.
6) Prepared Oral Testimonies – investigator/examiner must be ready to testify in court with regards to his participation in the investigation of the case as a witness
or as an examiner.
1) Real/Object Evidence – tangible objects (items that speaks for themselves), addressed to the senses of the court.
2) Associative Evidence – evidence, which links the crime scene with the criminal/perpetrator of the crime. These are items unconsciously left behind by the
suspect such as: fingerprints, footprints, personal properties, etc.
3) Tracing Evidence – evidence that may be found in the suspect through the transfer of these items from crime scene to his person, such as: paints, blood, mud,
dirt, etc.
4) Oral Testimonies – interviews with persons with personal knowledge about the crime under investigation.
5) Documentary Evidence – written information
Purpose :
> To ease the scene; and
> Avoid mingling and possible destruction
(b) Individual Characteristics – attributable marks or features found on individual items or things.
(1) Microscopic Examination Details
(2) Striation Markings (tools and firearms)
(3) Individual cuts and depressions (footprints, fingerprints)
a) Natural – this refers to weather condition, length of time or exposure to sunlight, rains, animals, etc.
b) Accident Causes – inexperienced or untrained personnel, unintentional damages, etc.
c) Intentional – deliberate acts to erase or disturb conditions and positions of material evidence.
a. Obtain it legally (valid search warrant, permission and consent of the owner)
b. Described the details in your notes
c. Identify it properly
d. Pact it properly
e. Maintain the “Chain of Custody of Evidence) or chrono1ogical accounting of evidence.
>. Circumstantial Evidence – facts and circumstances observed and testified to by witnesses that an inference of the identity of the perpetrators may be established.
6. Eyewitness Testimony – required is that the witness possesses personal knowledge, meaning, must have actually witnessed the commission of the crime.
8. Be able to Reconstruct Events – the purpose is to assess the crime scene and possibly to infer assumptions or conclusions through the appearance, nature and
conditions of objects, on the theory that they speak for themselves.
The inadequacy of these exhibits will give a hard time for the examiner to perform his/her tasks; utmost, the examination will not prosper due to insufficiency of
materials or exhibits.
Search, collection & identification and eventually handling and preservation of evidence is a tedious function, but with the breadth of interest and felicity of
inspiration and investigator possess, such few qualities can overcome this problem.
1. Get all the Physical Evidence - Collect every item or evidence suspected or foreign though it does not seem important at the time. Process the crime scene
proceeding inwards but start collecting the marked and identified pieces of physical evidence outwards. The closer it is to the center of the crime, the more valuable the
evidence is.
2. Mark the Evidence Correctly – Always take photographs, then mark down on your sketch the exact place where you found the evidence. Record in your
notebook the exact details. NEVER MARK THE EVIDENCE WITH “X”, IT IS TOO COMMON AND EASY TO IMITATE.
In marking evidence, be careful with evidence that affects its monetary value, like jewelries, watches, or any other type of personal properties that marking would
depreciate its worth, they must not be mark instead use the other forms of identification.
3. Prevent Contamination - Must always use and maintain separate containers to each of the pieces of physical evidence collected. Do not do anything on the
evidences that may change or contaminate each other except in those instances that could be explained. The use of small bottles, envelopes, folded papers, self-sealing
envelopes for small types of evidence is proper. Do not put two (2) objects that are to be compared in the same container.
4. Maintain the PRINCIPLE OF CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF EVIDENCE – shall mean the continuous handling of a piece of evidence from the time it was searched or
collected up to the time it is offered or presented as evidence in court. The Chain of Custody of Evidence – must be maintained unbroken from the time of the search and
collection of the evidence until it is presented in court. This chain must be kept to a minimum, ideally one person, except in reasonable circumstances.
Articles at the scene of the crime may not always be readily recognizable as evidence of the crime. The investigator must make a preliminary evaluation or survey
of the objects as they are found, to determine whether they have evidentiary value and should be collected. The apparent absence of any piece of physical evidence at the crime
would only tend to show that perhaps the investigator failed to conduct the necessary processing and searching of the crime scene. The following basic checklist should be used
to ensure that the investigator has recognized and examined all potential evidence at the scene.
1. What crime has occurred? Different types of crime generate different types of physical evidence.
2. Items unusual to the scene. Articles, which would NOT normally be found at the type of scene in question, should be collected as evidence, since it is likely that
the offender either brought the object to the scene or disturbed the object in its normal location.
3. Items necessary to complete. Proof that a crime has in fact been committed.
4. Weapons and other instruments of crime. Weapons or instrument used to facilitate the commission of the crime.
5. Associative/tracing items. What items are significant to link or trace the suspect to the crime and eventually would identify him/her.
6. Is there any fingerprints or tracks searched?
7. What are the evidences to be used as standards or exemplars?
1. QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS
Questioned Documents reveal a lot of identifiable features, which can be employed to support other evidence, confirm that the crime occurred and link or
eliminate a suspect.
a. Burned
1) Examine with care the area of burned documents. A slight gust of wind may alter the evidence.
2) Take photo of the burned paper residue in order to record their position and location. In addition, record and photograph any visible writings on the paper.
3) Use a cardboard sheet, a piece of glass or metal plate to pick up the burned paper. Put the evidence into a firm container seamed with cotton batting. Tweezers
can be used to pick up small pieces.
4) Burned paper located in trashcans or safety deposit boxes should remain in the container where located and the entire container submitted.
5) Mark the evidence with your initial, the date and an exhibit number.
6) Label any mailing materials as “FRAGILE”
1)Always surrender the authentic evidence rather than is photograph, photocopy or any other type of reproduction
2) Handle the document properly and protect the concealed fingerprints.
3) Label the document with your initials, the date and an exhibit number in the most visible but less crucial pale of the document. Put it in a protective covering if
it is brittle or may be exposed to rough treatment. Avoid putting staples or pins on the document
4) Pack the document in an envelope or plastic covering, fasten and mark with your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
5) Collect a comparison standard.
a. Imprints – usually visible. These are transfers of oils from the skin, transfer of blood, transfer of dirt. These prints are processed by photographing or at times the use of
developing powders.
b. Impressions in putty, in tar, in wet paints, in greasy surfaces or silt; usually semi-visible and invisible prints. These prints are processed by using developing powders,
chemicals or fumes.
The investigator should be alert on the places of where latent prints could be searched. First, the place of entrance like doorknobs, broken windows, light switches.
Second, place of attack, like drinking glasses, furniture, safes, cabinets, all plain smooth surfaces where valuables may have been touched by the suspect(s). Thirdly, place of exit
like doorknobs, side of doors until the gates.
Visible imprints are the most obvious and noticeable evidence and should be collected first through photographs. Hidden prints are revealed by dusting and are
observed by looking in an “OBLIQUE” manner. Developing latent prints must be observed the “PRINCIPLE OF CONTRAST” . Then mount or lift onto a fingerprint card or a
mounting form paper
Extreme care must be used with the fresh fingerprints since they are easy to smear. If it can not be developed, pack it on a box where the prints will not be touched
or altered.
3. FOOT and TIRE PRINTS & IMPRESSIONS – These are produced when material adheres to the sole and heel of the shoe or the tread of the tire it is deposited on a
hard base or surface. For example; dust, paint, blood, etc., adhering to a shoe or tire may leave a print on paper or a polished wooden base.
IMPRESSIONS made by foot prints, tires, and tools can easily be destroyed during a preliminary crime scene search. To prevent the loss of or damaging such
evidence, immediately secure the crime scene and conduct the collection and preservation of impressions forthwith in the following manner:
5. BODY FLUIDS – Body fluids and seminal stains are important evidences. Whether it be bloodstains or seminal fluids, they can be employed to determine if a person
is associated with a crime or not. The succeeding presentations are offered as guidelines:
a. Procedures
1. Collect articles with stained on it; cut it from the large source and mark it with your initial directly on the evidence in a conspicuous place away from the stained area.
2. Dry the blood through natural process or at a room temperature.
3. Cut it, if the owner consented; if not scrape it with a clean knife
4. When blood samples are required, it should be taken by medical personnel with approximately 5 cc in a sterile test tube.
1. Fresh Blood – collect it with tissue paper or with a medicine dropper and place it in a bottle with preservative. In case NO preservative, place it in a microscope slide and allow
it to dry carefully without any heat, or soak them with pieces of blotting paper or filter paper and let them dry.
2. Do not heat stained material or place it in bright sunlight to dry. Hang clothing and similar articles in a room where there is a rapid air movement, like an electric fan, except
when foreign material has potential significance.
3. If items containing fresh moist stains are not completely dried before packaging, decomposition will occur which will prevent complete testing.
4. When the stain is dry, label the item and roll it in paper or place it in a paper bag or box; seal and label the container. Do not put stained objects into plastic bags.
c. Dried Stains
1. On cloth; label the article, roll in paper or place it in a bag or box, seal and label the container. Do not attempt to remove the stain from the cloth. On small solid objects;
send entire object to the laboratory, after labeling and packaging it.
2. On large solid objects; it it is practical, the whole object should be delivered to the laboratory, with areas containing dry stains covered with paper.
3. If the stain cannot be removed in any manner, use a piece of gauze dampened with distilled water to absorb the stain, Make a similar swab of an unstained area. Dry the
gauze pads, place them in separate envelopes, mark for identification and seal.
d. Seminal Stains
Semen – is the male reproductive fluid. It normally contains spermatozoa, which are reproductive cells, as well as other substances. An ultra-violet lamp may be useful in the
preliminary search, because of the bluish - white fluorescence of semen stains.
Procedure:
1) Air – dry the material on a clean paper
2) When dried, place the material inside a paper bag. Mark the bag with the investigator’s initials, the date, and an exhibit number before fastening it. DO NOT
BAG ITEMS, IF THEY ARE NOT THOROUGHLY DRIED.
3) If the material has to be folded, cover the stained area with clean paper. Avoid folding across the stained area.
4) Bloodstained materials should be packaged individually.
5) Collect a comparison standard. Get blood and saliva samples following steps, a & b.
e. Saliva
Procedure:
1) Air – dry the material on a clean paper
2) When dried, place the material inside a paper bag. Mark the bag with the investigator’s initials, the date, and an exhibit number before fastening it. DO NOT
BAG ITEMS, IF THEY ARE NOT THOROUGHLY DRIED.
3) If the material has to be folded, cover the stained area with clean paper. Avoid folding across the stained area.
4) Saliva stained materials should be packaged individually.
5) Collect a comparison standard. Get blood and saliva samples following steps, a & b.
f. Sweat – Obtain sweat evidence, following/observing the steps shown in paragraph “c”.
g. Urine – Obtain urine evidence, following/observing the steps shown in paragraph “c”.
Examples are; animal (hairs, wools, silk), vegetable (cotton, flax, jute,
hemp), mineral (asbestos, glass) and other fabrics are common articles, yet contain a variety of animal, vegetable and synthetic fibers of numerous colors; thus threads and
individual fibers frequently are useful evidence in criminal cases. Fibers and threads are often found in fabric abrasions, torn metal or in other areas on hit and run vehicles. In
burglary cases, such evidence may be located on torn screens, broken glass, or metal or safes, or other locations.
Collection procedure:
1) Use forceps and place it on a paper. Sufficient samples from both victim and suspect must be submitted for examination. Threads, cords, and ropes are cut into
pieces as exemplars or samples.
2) Fabrics are threads woven together crosswise.
All these forms of physical evidence come from fibers. A number of fibers
can be twisted to form a thread. A number of threads can be twisted to form a cord. A number of cords can be twisted to form a rope. The difference usually is that of the size
and strength.
b. Things to look for in Shoes – The shoes itself must be wrapped and
submitted for examination.
c. Clothing, rugs, blankets and curtains – To be examined, must be taken away from the suspect as soon as possible. Do not cut or damage the garment. If it is
necessary to cut clothing, cut any place other than where a bullet or knife has gone through. If clothing are wet or stained with blood, urine or water, let it dry at a room
temperature before packing. In collecting, be careful of any objects falling or dropping from the clothing, these things may be of importance. Markings must be done on the
plastic container separately packed. Falling or adhered evidence must be collected separately and record its exact location or source.
1) Evidence found adhering to movable evidences must be protected with cellophane or paper then transmitted to the Forensic Crime Laboratory
2) For non-movable evidences/objects, scrape it and place it in a cartoon with cover
3) Mark and label all evidences, however, see to it that there are sufficient standards included.
e. Tissue
a. Hair Strands
9. FIREARMS EVIDENCE
Ballistics – is the science that deals with the motion and flight of projectiles. The laboratory can establish the range, trajectory or penetration power of fired
bullet, ricochet pattern studies and the like.
Things to consider when firearm is recovered at the crime scene:
b. Gunshot Residue
c. Loaded Weapon – revolvers – make a diagram on the rear face of the cylinder to show the position of each cartridge with respect to the firing pin. The
cartridges should be numbered to correspond to the numbering of the chambers.
d. Small Firearm
e. Serial Numbers
1) If the serial number has been erased, put an identifying mark on the weapon.
2) Attach an identification tag to the weapon containing your initials, the date, and an exhibit number.
3) Put the weapon in a paper or plastic bag.
4) Do not attempt to retrieve the serial number using acid-tech solutions.
f. Shoulder Weapons
i. Fired Paper/Shotgun shells may be marked either on the inside or the outside of the paper or plastic portion of the shell. Brass Shells should be treated as
cartridge case.
1) Photograph the fire paper shot shells before conducting an
examination.
2) Do not mar, mutilate, scratch, or nick head the shell.
2. Note as to markings of identification used.
3. Sketch showing relative position of shells when recovered on the floor or street.
4. Transmit the information to the laboratory.
5. With ink or indelible pencil, mark inside of shells using initials of persons recovering.
6. Do not scratch, nick, mar or mutilate brass head of shell.
7. Roll individually in a paper.
8. Place wrapped cartridges in heavy paper envelope.
9. Forward to the laboratory.
10. Mark the bag with your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
j. Shotgun Wads – the wad should be placed in a pill box, sealed and labeled.
l. Ammunition as Evidence
1) Always attempt to recover unused ammunition for comparison purposes when firearms are obtained as evidence.
2) Unfired ammunitions may be marked on the side of the cartridge case, near the bullet end.
3) Ammunition may be compared to establish similarities in type and manufacturer.
4) In some instances it is possible to prove that hand loaded bullets had a common source or that the cartridges were reloaded with the same tools.
Extreme care is needed when searching for bomb or arson – related evidence. For instance, the presence of large volume of debris, their small size and possibility
of their being washed away when fire is extinguished, make this type of evidence hard to find. The succeeding paragraphs would show how arson and explosive debris are
gathered and preserved.
1. Arson Debris
a. Glass
1) Collect glass splinters and dust them for fingerprints, to determine if it indicates that a Molotov Cocktail device was used.
2) Package the glass splinters in a clean, fastenable metal can.
Mark the metal can with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent information.
1) Collect materials, which may appear to have traces of gasoline or any other incendiary. Follow the steps shown above for glass.
2) Obtain comparison standards. Materials similar to the collected evidence which appear to be free from gasoline or any other incendiary,
should be collected as standard. Though not always necessary, comparison standards are required especially if the floor or ground work is
chemically similar to the incendiary used.
d. Foreign Objects
2. Explosive Debris
a. Find the focus of the blast and then get loose debris from it. Subsequently, remove additional material up to 3-5 inches deep.
b. Put the evidence in separate clean, unused, metal cans. Fasten and mark the cans with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent
information.
c. Put objects to be in close proximity with the blast in metal cans. Mark them. Put metal objects form the explosive device in metal cans. Wrap items like
wires and objects with tool marks in tissue paper secured with a tape. Mark the metal cans with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent
information.
d. Evidence collected from the scene should not be placed in the same package together with the evidence obtained from the suspect.
e. Comparison standard should be packaged separately.
a. Find evidence from deactivated substances. Do not attempt to deactivate any explosive device unless you have been trained to do so.
b. Dust the mouth surface of the device for fingerprints.
c. If a tape or paper wrapping is found, put this in a clean unused metal can. Fasten the can and mark it with your initials, the date, exhibit number and
other pertinent information. Do not handle any of these directly with your fingers.
d. Segregate materials such as batteries, wires, and cap fragments. Put them in a clean, unused metal cans making sure that items with tool marks should
be wrapped in tissue paper and secured with tape. Mark the cans with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent information.
e. Put a 35 gram sample of the suspected explosive in a small, clean, unused metal container. Mark the container. Avoid sending explosives to mail.
Food and drug specimens may link a suspect with the crime or corroborate other evidence. The succeeding paragraphs outline the steps for gathering and
preserving liquid, powder, and solid or plant material specimens.
1. Liquids
2. Plant Materials
a. Air dry samples by putting it on brown paper for twenty four hours.
b. When thoroughly dried, put the evidence on a pillbox or a vial and fasten with tape.
c. Package each sample separately.
d. Weigh the contents.
e. Mark the container with your initials, the date, and an exhibit number.
f. Collect a comparison standard.
3. Powder or Solids
12. GLASS
a. For wide mouth, insert two or more fingers inside it, then place it inside a hard cartoon container.
b. For small mouth, place index finger on top and the thumb on the bottom, then place it in a hard cartoon container.
c. Seal off and avoid contamination or stilling of contents that may destroy the evidentiary value.
2. Broken Glasses
3. Large Fragments
4. Small Fragments
To obtain a comparison standard for glass, collect comparison samples from the area nearest the point of impact. Samples should be at least the size of a one-peso
coin. Clearly tag each comparison sample with adhesive tape bearing your initials, the date, and exhibit number. Wrap each comparison fragment according to the proper
procedures outlined above. When the direction of force will be analyzed, always collect a glass standard from any remaining glass in a window or door as close.
Liquids and viscous substance may be used to link a suspect to the crime or eliminate him from consideration. These evidence readily evaporate and are easily
contaminated, hence, utmost case is required during collection. The succeeding paragraphs indicate how substances like alcohol, gasoline, glue, oil, etc. and comparison
standards should be gathered and preserved.
a. Liquids
b. Viscous Substance
If it is possible, put the substance into a clean unused tight-fitting metal can;
If it too viscous to be poured, use a plastic spoon when putting it inside a container.
If it is already kept in tight-fitting container, which is not more than one print, send it to the laboratory in its original container.
14. METALS
Offenders in most crimes use metallic objects, such as knives or firearms, A metal can reveal information like surface imperfections, scratches, and chemical
composition. The e succeeding paragraphs reveal how to gather and preserve metal evidence.
a. Fillings
b. Fragments
1) Fragments may come in the form of bullets, bullet fragments, grillwork, headlights frames, dies, etc. which may be embedded or embedded in walls, floor,
etc.
2) For embedded fragments;
Collect the evidence and put it in a plastic bag or in any appropriately sized container.
Use padding materials when packaging the evidence to protect the identifying characteristics or the area along the fracture plane from damage.
Fasten and name similar to procedure in Metals 1.
Ask for the assistance of laboratory technicians, to remove the embedded fragments from the wall, floor etc.
Pack as much of the material where the fragment is embedded in an appropriately sized container.
Fasten the container and attach an evidence tag marked with your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
Collect comparison standard.
c. Large sections
1) Get photo of the obvious marks on doors or other materials, which are too massive to be removed. Don’t forget to place a scale beside the evidence when
taking the photographs
2) Protect the marks by casting them in silicon rubber compound.
3) Pack and mark the cast similar to the procedure of impression of footprints but leave our “NORTH” marking
4) Collect a comparison standard.
A door that has been forcibly opened is the place where a standard source for fillings found on the floor can be obtained. Gather, pack and mark the
filings as in Metal Filings.
A file, a pry bar, or metal filings found on the offender’s shoes, cuffs, pockets, or other clothing parts represent the standard against, which evidence
found from the crime scene can be matched. Gather, pack and mark the standard as shown in metal filing, fragments and large sections.
15. PAINTS
Paint specimens may be liquid, chips or smudges. The succeeding paragraphs reflect how various forms of paint and comparison standard can be gathered and
kept.
i. Liquids
1. Follow the procedure outlined for viscous substances in Liquid’s viscous substance
2. Comparison Standard- Paint Chips and Smears
3. Extract Paint Evidence- using a clean knife or peeling instrument from two spots where the paint was located and from the suspected source of the
questioned paint. Try to collect at least ½ square inch of surface area for each evidence with all paint layers presented. Surrender all chips or peelings at
hand. If the material is small, send the whole material. Pack and mark all items as indicated in paint samples.
16. SOIL
Soil and mineral may reveal evidence that could link the offender to the crime, samples collected should have soil characteristics similar to that of the crime scene
area. The succeeding paragraphs indicate how dried mud, dry soil, mud and comparison standards are gathered and kept.
a. Caked Mud
1) When gathering pieces of cake mud, use an instrument such as spoon or knife. Clean the instrument right after using.
2) Pack in a clean plastic bag any personal effects, like clothing and shoes containing traces of caked mud. Package the effects separate bags.
3) Fasten each bag and mark your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
4) Collect a comparison standard.
b. Dry Soil
c. Mud
1) Utilize a clean knife and peel off the mud on materials that can not be sent to the laboratory
2) Put the peelings in plastic or cardboard container
3) Fasten the container and mark with your initials, the origin, the date and an exhibit number.
4) Collect comparison standard
Dust = means small particles, which are fine enough to float in air and usually can be identified only by a microscope.
1. Poisons - are any substances, which get inside a human body and causes serious injury or death.
Most poisons are chemicals, medicines or natural products, which can cause illness or death. The detection and identification of poisons in the body is called
Toxicology.
Besides collecting bottles, containers and dishes, the investigator should be present at the autopsy to gather specimens taken by thee doctor, like: vomits,
urine, and stomach washings.
This particularly applies in Traffic Accidents or if alcohol was used to facilitate the commission of a crime. It is easier to detect and examine a person drunk than a
person under the influence of liquor or not drunk. This can be determines through chemical examination of the blood or urine,
Alcoholic Beverages
The most common alcohol is ethyl or ethanol, which is called grain alcohol because it is usually made from grain products. Other common alcohols
are Methyl used for lamps and isopropyl alcohol used for hair tonics and cosmetics. These two (2) kinds are very poisonous and do not produce a good feeling to
persons who drink them. They are not commonly found in intoxication cases.
Alcohol in beverages comes from the chemical change of sugar. If grain is used to start, it must first be changed to sugar. The process is called
MALTING. All intoxicating beverages are mostly water, alcohol and flavoring materials. These are added or may come from the burned barrels in which the
beverages are stored. The burned woods of barrels give whisky and scotch its brown color.
Even though the investigator has a blood or urine sample, he should also make certain tests of the person in order to testify in court, such as:
a) Balance
b) Coordination
c) Reaction time
d) Eye condition and reaction to light
e) Speech
f) Breath odor
g) Walking and turning ability
The best sample for alcohol test is the blood and the nest is urine. Sodium benzoate is the best preservative for urine and sodium fluoride for blood.
a) Use clean bottles or jars – containers must have tight stopper or cover to avoid evaporating or spilling;
b) Seal and label the specimen correctly – a tag would be better than labeling
c) Give the laboratory all information – investigator must to the request a detailed report for the examiner to facilitate examination.
The crime of causing a fire is called ARSON. Some motives of Arson are:
a) Pyromaniacs – these are people with a mental condition who get pleasure in watching the fire burn or watching the firemen put out the fire.
b) Frauds – set fire for insurance purposes
c) Concealment of another crime
d) Revenge
All unusual physical evidence used to put the accused at the scene of the crime should be collected. These include broken glass, hair, fibers, soil, debris, etc.
if the criminal used a liquid to set the fire, there is a possibility that this material may be on his clothing or shoes. Investigator should coordinate with experienced firemen
to locate for materials used to start the fire. Ashes and containers must be properly sealed and wrapped to protect from evaporation, then marked properly before
transmitting it to the laboratory for examination.
Explosives are very delicate and dangerous to attend to, therefore, an experienced demolition expert has to handle the situation.
However, after an explosion, the investigator must conduct a proper photography of the areas affected. Investigator must exert effort to look for fragments of torn
metal from the bomb itself or bits of wood and cardboard and parts of clocks used to set off the explosion. Found fragments must be placed in an envelope or container and
properly identified.
Biological Materials
Blood is usually spilled inmost crimes of violence and the criminal may shed it while committing his crime. It is the best specimen for testing alcohol in sobriety
examinations, also in disputed paternity cases.
An adult male has about 5,000 cc or 10 pints of blood unlike in females, which has 3,800 xx or 8 pints.
Blood sample sent to the laboratory for examination is to determine its blood groupings. Samples from suspects, if the investigator shall bring the suspect to the
laboratory for extracting of blood samples.
2. Seminal Stains
Semen is the male fluid, milky white fluid containing millions of small cells with tails called PERMATOZOA. Each male ejaculation produces about 3.5 cc or a
teaspoonful of semen. Semen is important physical evidence in cases of seduction, rape, unnatural acts of perversion and bestiality with animals.
The investigator should get the clothing of both the victim and suspect as soon as possible after the offense was committed. The clothing must not be rolled or
crumbled to avoid destruction of the spermatozoa. The alleged victim must be subjected to a Physician’s examination to determine the presence of spermatozoa, injury and
other related details. Detailed interview and investigation must be done on the victim to determine other related factors whether she maybe telling the truth or making a false
accusation.
3. Hair
Structure of Hair
Hair consists of a root, tip, and a shaft. All hairs have a root; if the hair has fallen naturally, the root is found to be dried up; if it was pulled out, the
root is shaped like a bulb. There are several parts of a hair:
Hair evidence should be looked for on clothing, combs, weapons, in pockets, on the fingers of the victim and the suspect. Samples must be taken
from both victim and suspect. Samples may be taken from the head and pubic hair. The best way of collecting hair samples is by combing. Investigator must
at least submit 100 hair samples, which must be placed in a paper envelope and properly sealed and identified.
Photographs should be taken. Soil sample should be collected. Do not attempt to remove hair or other objects from the bones and do not attempt to wash or clean
them in any way. A careful search for all teeth must be made. A piece of wire screen can be used to sift all soil in the area to look for small bones or body particles, this
sometimes become the lead in the identify of the victim.
18. Miscellaneous
Materials like cigarette butts jewelry, magnetic tape recordings or writing instruments can link a person to a crime since each provides easily identifiable features.
For example, a tape recording of anonymous voices heard as pale of the threat prior to a bombing or extortion may be associated with known voices of an offender through
voiceprint analysis, assuming there was careful recording of questions and known voices. The succeeding paragraphs show how cigarette butts, jewelry, magnetic tape
recording, writing instruments and comparison standards are gathered and kept.
a) Collect the cigarette butt using a piece of paper or tweezers and put on a
small plastic bag. Never hold the cigarette butts with your hands.
b) Label the bag with your initials, the date the source and an exhibit number.
c) Clear tobacco material from papers or clothes pockets into a plastic pillbox. Label and fasten as above.
D. MARKING EVIDENCE
Evidence must be marked to assure that its identity can be legally established in court. When evidence is produced in court, it is imperative to prove it is the same
as that found at the scene. Normal descriptions of items are not sufficient; distinctive symbols or initials of the recovering officer, date when recovered and/or an individual
letter on each item of evidence collected should be used. These marks can be written, scratched or carved, however, not to damage the item or alter its evidentiary value, by
using the other methods of identifying such as; labeling or tagging.
Exceptions:
No attempt should be made to mark evidence, when:
Objects, which are not suitable for markings must be tagged. A paper tag firmly affixed to the items of evidence can serve as a basis for later identification.
Advantage: it provides for a greater space for recording pertinent data, such as:
1) Case number
2) Date & time when article was found
3) Name and description of the article
4) Location and time of recovery
5) Signature of the investigator/finder
6) Name of witness(es) to the recovery
Physical evidence may be most effectively presented in court if it has been properly handled and preserved. An analysis of evidence by the laboratory may be
impossible, if the evidence has been altered or contaminated.
2. Containers
The investigator should try to suit his containers to the sample. Due to bacterial or fungal actions it is imperative that one does not put damp or biological evidence
in plastic bags. The following is suggested:
3. Storing Evidence
Evidence should be stored in a safe, evidence vault, locker or some other location where unauthorized persons do not have access to it. This applies to both
temporary and long range storage.
Proper handling of physical evidence is necessary to obtain maximum possible information upon which scientific examination shall be based and to prevent
exclusion as evidence in court. Specimens, who truly represent the material, found at the scene, unaltered, unspoiled or otherwise unchanged in handling will provide more and
better information upon examination. Legal requirements make it necessary to account for all pieces of physical evidence from the time it was collected until it is presented in
court. With this in mind, the following principles should be observed in handling all types of evidence:
1. The evidence should reach the laboratory as mush as possible in the same condition as when it was found;
2. The quantity of specimen should be adequate. Even with the best equipment available, good results cannot be obtained from insufficient specimens;
3. Submit a known or standard specimen for comparison purposes.
4. Keep each specimen from others so there will be no intermingling or mixing known and unknown material. Wrap and seal in individual packages when
necessary.
5. Mark or label each piece of evidence for positive identification as the evidence taken from a particular location in connection with the crime under
investigation.
6. The chain of custody of evidence must be maintained. Account for evidence from the time it is collected until it is produced in court. Any break in this chain
of custody may make the material inadmissible as evidence in court.
In order that examination can be performed promptly and permit ready reference to cases in a later date, it is necessary that laboratory personnel have certain
information about the evidence submitted and the case under investigation. A separate written request should be prepared for each examination desired (e.g. for Ballistic Test,
for Chemistry Test, etc.). The request should contain the following information to accompany all evidence submitted to the laboratory examination:
1. Type of offense under investigation;
2. Date, date and place of commission;
3. Date when evidence was collected. (This may not be the same date as when the offense was committed.)
4. Name of victim(s) and suspect(s); and their address;
5. Name of the officer and office submitting the material;
6. A list of specimens submitted and each instance a brief but comprehensive description of:
a) where the specimen was found in relation to other objects at the crime scene;
b) condition of the material when found peculiarity in any respect; and
c) any changes in the nature of the evidence, which the investigators may have made either accidentally or unintentionally.
7. Type of examination desired for each specimen submitted; and
8. A brief summary of the facts of the case under investigation.
Before submitting the evidence to the laboratory, consult the following checklists.
1. Personal Delivery of Evidence – is the best method, it will permit a personal contact for consultation between the criminalists and the investigator, which may be very
beneficial.
2. Mail Shipments of Evidence – use registered or certified mail if evidence is of high monetary value or if it is small and of critical value. Otherwise, first or fourth class
mail is satisfactory.
3. Prevent Damage – package contents so that breakage or contamination will not occur during shipment.
4. Restrictions – Follow postal regulations. Do not mail explosives and other prohibited items.
5. Seat package completely – even if fourth class mail is employed. Do not just tie with string, but rather employ tape which meets postal service regulations.
6. Place the cover latter on the outside of package.
7. Express shipments packaging procedures are the same as for regular mail shipments.
1. Explosives – Do not deliver or ship explosives to the lab without contacting the criminalists by telephone first, he will evaluate the situation and indicate the
procedures to be followed.
2. Dangerous Materials – The same telephone contact must be made prior delivering loaded weapons, dangerous chemicals, etc.
INTRODUCTION
No matter how intelligent a person is when after several months or years, possible he can no longer remember everything. Settled has been the observation of
luminaries, memory cheats sometimes the person. Notes taking or recording facts can never be substituted by memory alone. Courts usually allow a witness to refresh his
memories through notes.
CONCEPT
Notes taking and sketching are methods of documenting a crime incident, they are permanent records and are admissible in evidence, especially during rebuttal
stage.
WHAT ARE SOME OF THE STANDARD METHODS OF RECORDING INVESTIGATIVE DATA?
RECORDING – refers to the act of writing down all pertinent and material facts and details surrounding the commission of a crime under investigation.
1. NOTES TAKING – Specifically speaking, notes taking begins when the investigator arrives at the crime scene. He writes down the identity of persons involved in the
incident. Writes down the condition of his surroundings and his observation to material evidence. He also draws a basic sketch of the crime scene and takes the
initial photographs. This is to ensure that image of the crime scene is recorded before any opportunity occurs whereby the scene is disturbed.
Advantages:
Purpose:
a. Basis for action at higher levels
b. Enables co-workers to take the next logical steps
c. Establishes validity of complaint and indicates general nature and magnitude of the case (prosecutive action).
Qualities of Notes:
a. Clarity/clearness – use of simple words
b. Accuracy/accurate – direct and certain
c. Brief/brevity – short and concise but complete
d. Specific – exactness of numbers, location, nature of case, etc.
e. It answers the cardinal principles of investigation.
SKETCH – is the simplest and most effective way of showing actual measurements and identifying significant items evidence in their location at the scene. It is admissible
if it is reasonably related and explanatory of the testimony of the witness who drew it and used it to illustrate his testimony.
MAPS & DIAGRAMS – are admissible as evidence when they are reasonably necessary to understand the testimony of witness/es and when a foundation of the accuracy
is laid by the person who prepared the map or diagram.
A. Kinds of Sketch:
Query: Is the investigator allowed to have the rough sketch formalized by an artist?
Answer: Yes, provided it be under his supervision and direction.
B. Types of Sketches
C. Classes of Sketches
1) Sketch to Locality – depicts the crime scene and its environment and roads leading to the location or house/crime scene.
2) Sketch of Grounds – this pictures the scene of the crime and its nearest physical surroundings.
3) Sketch on Details – describes the immediate scene only. For example: the room in which the crime happened and the details thereof.
D. Surveying Methods
2) Triangulation Coordinates/Method – measurements made from each of two fixed objects to the point where relevant pieces of evidence are, later on
forming a triangle.
4) Coordinates constructed on transecting base line – a stretched line from one fixed point of reference extended to another fixed point, the evidence
are measured aligned with the base line.
5) Compass Coordinates – a measuring device is stretched from one fix point of reference and the compass is used to detect the degree or position of
the evidence.
1) Title – brief narration or information about the incident, place, time, date committed, victims and the investigating officer.
2) Time/date and weather condition – response time, condition of crime scene upon arrival.
3) North Compass Direction – an arrow pointing to the direction of the north – for orientation purposes.
Note: Measurements must be accurate using appropriate standard measuring devices. Use of steps or approximation must be avoided. Sketches are not substitute for notes or
photographs, they are but a supplement to them.
F. Rules in Sketching
CHAPTER VII
Interview – is the questioning of a person believed to possess knowledge that is of official interest to the investigator.
* Importance of Interview : Interview in crime investigation is very important as the person interviewed usually gives his account of an incident under investigation or offers
information concerning a person being investigated in his own manner and words.
Interrogation – is the questioning of a person suspected of having committed an offense or a person who is reluctant to make a full disclosure of information in his possession
which is pertinent to the investigation.
Criminal is Identified Traced & Located The facts providing his guilt are gathered for
court presentation
1. Eyewitness testimony 1. Vanity or flight – betrays guilt 1. Relevancy of Evidence
2. Confession/admission * An investigator is no better than his information. 2. Competency of Evidence
3. Circumstantial Evidence 2. Official & unofficial records 3. Corpus Delicti
a. Motive 3. Pedigree, social, business & criminal history * Factum probandum
b. Opportunity 4. Modus Operandi * Factum Probans
c. Associative Evidence 5.Background Investigation 4. Knowledge of Laws
d. Tracing Evidence 6. Surveillance 5. Legally obtained evidence
e. Rogues Gallery 7. Associates/friends 6. Fruits of a Poisonous tree
f. Portrait Parle
g. Cartography or artist’s sketch
Information – answers the question, who did it? Interview/interrogation – simple questioning/ Instrumentation
skillful questioning
Any knowledge the investigator gathers 1. Witnesses & their abilities/educational 1. Use of Criminalistics
1. Records/files qualifications * Technical Science
a. Private documents 2. Informers/informants * Scientific Science
b. Public documents 3. Victims/complainants 2. Significance of a Crime Scene
c. Official documents * Consider the constitutional rights of the person 3. Physical Evidence
d. Commercial documents * RA 4200 4.Requirements in the Admissibility of Evidence
2. Public spirited people * RA 7438 a. Relevancy and competency
3. Conscientious people * Miranda Doctrine b. Chain of custody of evidence
4. Knowledge obtained through observations *Self-incrimination
* Confession/Admission
Confidential informant – a person who provides confidential information concerning a past or projected crime and does not wish to be known as the source of the
information.
1. Adaptability – the ability to understand people from all walks of life, to meet them on their won level on varied subjects and to adapt to their personalities and lifestyle.
2. Self-control and Patience – the act of being professional, sympathetic yet uninvolved, waiting for responses while patiently leading the conversation and providing
facts.
3. Confidence and Optimism - feel you are better education and thus must be in control of the interview.
4. Objectivity – Maintain your perspective on what is sought, avoiding pre-conceived ideas about the case.
5. Sensitivity to Individual Rights – Maintain a balance between the rights of others and those of society.
6. Knowledge of the Elements of the Crime – Know what information you need to prove the elements of the crime you are investigating. Phrase questions to elicit
information related to these elements.
B.1. Interview - the effectiveness of an investigator is largely dependent upon his ability to obtain information from complainants, witnesses, informants, and suspects.
“I” – Interview preparation – investigator acquaints himself to the case, prepares what he wants to establish or know from the subject
“R” – Give the subject time to recall about the incident “Warm –up”
“O” – Opening statement
“N” – Narrative
“I” – Inquiry
“C” - Complement
4. Techniques in Questioning
a. Precise questioning – restrict the range of information which the subject can give in an answer.
b. Shunting – technique of asking question which relates the digression to the original line of questioning.
c. Skipping by guessing – questions of intervening details which is an act of anticipating conclusions to skip probable outcome of the various stages of
the subject’s recital.
6. Types of Interviews
d. Children – permission to interview children must be obtained from parents or guardians; determine ability to discern.
(1) Boys – determine perception and intelligence, more on falsehood.
(2) Girls – intensely interested in the world as it reacts to her, observant to her young neighbors.
e. Young persons – not ideal witness, they are ideally preoccupied.
f. Middle-aged persons –Ideal witness, they are keenly aware of his fellow beings.
g. Older Persons – Very effective witness, they add maturity to judgment.
Logical Approach – is based on reason. Use logic to determine why the person refuses to cooperate and to explain the benefits of cooperating. Explain the
problems that result when people who know about a crime do not cooperate.
Emotional Approach – addresses such negative feelings as hate, anger, greed, revenge, pride and jealousy. You can increase these emotions or simply
acknowledge them by explaining to the person that “anyone else in the same situation would respond the same way.”
Direct Question – is to the point, allowing little possibility of misinterpretation. Use this type that come right to the point.
Indirect Question – is a bit disguised and could elicit a variety of answers. Use this type of questioning to those that skirt the basic question, sparingly.
Cognitive Interview – a method that calls for using a secluded, quiet place that is free of distractions for the interview and encouraging subjects to speak
slowly.
9. Evaluation
a. Physical Mannerisms – nervousness, evasive facial expressions, perspiration and similar signs
b. Frankness – truthfulness
c. Emotional state – reaction to questions
d. Content of statements – discrepancies and misrepresentations
Primary Objectives:
1. Miranda Doctrine
2. Sec. 12, Art. III, 1987 Constitution
3. Sec. 17, Art. III, 1987 Constitution
4. Waiver in relation to Art. 125, RPC as amended
5. Waiver in relation to RA 7438
6. Using deception or misrepresentation during Interrogation is illegal
7. Turf of the interrogation
8. Use of Third-Degree Tactics – use of physical force, threats of force or other physical, mental or psychological abuse – are illegal. Any information so obtained,
including confessions, is inadmissible in court.
9. Language
1) General knowledge and Interest – must develop intellectual curiosity and keen observation
2) Alertness – constantly alert able to analyze subject accurately
3) Perseverance – patience and decision & willingness to continue
4) Integrity – unquestionable personality; inspired confidence or trust
5) Logical Mind – objective and clearly defined intentions
6) Ability in Observation and Interpretations – able ness to observe and interpret reactions
7) Power of self control
Detection of Deception
1) Physiological Symptoms – emotional reactions are insight in determining guilty knowledge or deception.
2) Lie Detection or Polygraphy – records of several measurements on a visible graph. The polygraph scientifically measures respiration and depth of breathing
changes in the skin’s electrical resistance and blood pressure and pulse. The person does not actually have to respond verbally for a polygraph to work because the
machine measures the mental and emotional responses regardless of whether the person answers questions.
Admissions – contains some information concerning the elements of the crime but falls short of a full confession. It is a self-incriminatory statement by the subject falling short
of an acknowledgement of guilt.
Confessions – is information supporting the elements of the crime given by a person involved in committing the crime; or the direct acknowledgement of committing the crime.
Confession – is a direct acknowledgment of the truth of the guilty fact as charged or of some essential part of the commission of the criminal act itself.
Requisites of a Valid Confession:
Deposition – is the testimony of a witness reduced to writing under oath or affirmation, before a person empowered to administer oaths, in answer to interrogatories
(questions) and cross interrogatories submitted by the parties. Ordinarily it is an attorney who gets depositions.
Duress – imposition of restrictions on physical behavior (Ex. Prolonged detention, deprivation of food, sleep, etc.
Coercion - connotes the idea of physical force; application of illegal physical methods
Psychological Constraint – Free action of the will may be unlawfully restrained by threats or other methods of instilling fear.
Deception and Promises – No deception, promises, threats, tricks, or cajoling may be used to obtain from the suspect a waiver of his rights.
Trickery and Deception – deceit or defrauding styles
Ex. a) Informing the subject that his accomplice has confessed
b) Pretending that cogent evidence such as additional witnesses or documents exists.
Employment of Promises
Example:
a) Release from Custody
b) Lighter sentence
c) Pardon, etc.
Ham letting – forcibly taking any relative of a suspect in exchange for the surrender or appearance of suspect. Includes coercive act of forcing people to transfer or vacate their
place of abode.
Truth Serums – are fast-acting barbiturates of the type used to produce sleep at the approximate level of surgical anesthesia. The theory is that, the drug removes the person’s
inhibitions so the person is more likely to tell the truth. Commonly used drugs are the sodium amytol and sodium pentathol.
CHAPTER VIII
I. Terminologies:
1. Written
2. Oral/spoken
G- gather the facts – conduct thorough investigation, interview to witnesses and interrogate suspects;
R- record the facts – jot down in your notes relevant and material information, do not rely on your mind;
O- organize the facts – arrange the sequence of the incidents in an outline form;
W- write the report – use simple words to construct short sentences; group related ideas into one paragraph.
E- evaluate the report – edit and proof read it, you may have misspelled or there may have been lapses in the grammar construction.
a. Gather the facts – the patrolman being the first police officer to arrive at the scene, initiates only the basic process of the investigation, such as:
2) Keen observation and documenting the crime scene and surroundings, if possible.
b. Record the facts – To record the facts the police officer will write in his notes, the following:
And will also conduct an exhaustive investigation, starting with the witness if victims was dead, search for other witnesses, interview doctors at the hospital and
the medical officer at the morgue to learn the cause of death; seek information to identify more the victim, and search for voluminous facts to solve the case.
Paragraphing is the vital link in a well organize report. Hence, all facts which are related to a particular situation will be presented chronologically in paragraph.
Presented hereunder are the three essentials of the narrative. It serves as a guide in paragraph construction and sequence presentation of ideas;
Setting:
a. When? – Time and date of occurrence
b. Where? – Place of occurrence – crime scene
Characters:
a. Who? – Persons involved in the crime
Victim
Suspects
Witness
Action:
a. What?- Nature of Crime
b. Why?- Motive
c. How? – Modus Operandi
They explained that when writing a reports, it must be simple, definite, specific and factual. In composition, essay or other kinds of writing can be imaginary or
inferred or can be optionated. Inference based on reasoning while opinion is a personal beliefs. Its sentence structure can be long with nice beautiful, high-sounding words –
flattering but may mean nothing.
Example:
The victim lying on the ground is an unidentified female in her sweet sixteen, with an angelic face and shapely body. IT is most unfortunate that he merciless killer
stabbed her on her freshly blossoming breast.
On the other hand, a police report writing is written in a simplest declarative sentence styling . Its diction is devoid of wordiness. One idea in one paragraph. It is
factual.
Example:
The victim is female, about 16 years old, oval shape face, light-brown complexion, about 1051lbs.? about 5’2” tall. She was stabbed on her left breast by and
unknown assailant.
1. CLARITY – use of simple words/terms not high or impressive words that requires the reader to consult the Webster.
Before you start to write, always decide what the exact purpose of your reporting; and make sure that every paragraph, every sentence, every word, make a clear
contribution to that purpose and make it at the right time.
How?
a. Avoid impressive expressions
Example: Ten (10) KIA, One Hundred (100) M-16 Armalite Rifles, Five Hundred (500) Armalite Live ammunitions.
Wordy Brief
4. SPECIFICITY
Use language that is simple, definite, specific, accurate, factual and familiar. Make sure that you write the essential ingredients of the report. Avoid too long
discussion as long as you have the express the real incident in the case.
Example: An automobile – this is wrong. It should be . . . 1990 Toyota Corolla colored red with license plate number ABT 007.
5. ATTRACTIVITY
Make your report attractive (neat, clean and arranged/formatted), the reader will have an interest looking/reading it.
a. Proper Capitalization
b. Proper Abbreviation
c. Proper punctuation
d. Proper Indention
e. Proper Spelling
7. It must be presented on Schedule – submitted promptly on time
1. Sentence Structure
Sentence – a group of words having a subject and predicate expressing a complete thought.
a) Police Sentence – is the same as any common grammatically structured narrative sentence with the usual subject, predicate and verb. The only deviation
is the use of police words, phrases, and other terminologies without being too technical, legal and vulgar.
b) Correctness in the Sentence – it is necessary to pay special attention to the key words:
Verbs
Pronouns
Adjectives
Adverbs
b) Dictation – means the correct choice of words though selecting the exact, precise, definite objectives of words to convey a meaning.
3. Paragraph Construction
a) Paragraph – is a sentence or a group of properly related ideas or sentences expressing a single idea.
b) Introductory Paragraph – is commonly the first paragraph in the investigative report which objective is to readily point out the reader the main point.
Characteristics of a Paragraph:
(1) Write Short Paragraph – if the ideas are presented in similar units, the reader of the report can easily follow the events from one sentence to
another.
(2) Give your Reader a Rest – voluminous and exhaustive an investigative report maybe, if the reporter can give his reader a period of rest.
(3) Recapture your Reader’s Attention – after giving a rest in between paragraphs he should not let her/him asleep. Instead he must recaptured his
interest
1. The Topic Sentence – is the first sentence immediately at the beginning of the next or ensuing paragraph. Importantly, in investigative report
2. The Linking Word- in order to hold the attention of our readers, the order of presenting the ideas in each paragraph must be in sequence. This is a
complied by the use of linking words and phrases, bridging the ideas of a previous paragraph wherein the reader can look back at the proceeding
sentence or forward to the forthcoming sentence of the next paragraph.
4. Spelling – spelling mistakes might cause your reader to think you’re careless or stupid. Correct spelling in important not only for impression but also for accuracy. A
misspelled name, for example may cause serious problems in future investigation in the case.
5. Homonyms - is a word that sounds like another word but has a different meaning and spelling.
Ex. Aisle- a passageway between rows of seats / Isle- an island
Altar- a place of worship/ Alter- to change
6. Division of Words – technically, the improper division of words is not an error in spelling. Nevertheless, a mistake committed makes the reader of there port
confused with the impression that the word has been misspelled
Ex. Sus- pect sui- cide mur - der
7. Capitalization and Numbers – some writers have the tendency to over capitalize the objectives to emphasize.
Ex. This is a Case of Murder wherein the victim was Maria Malas, 23 years, single, Flight Stewardess of the Philippine Airlines, residing at Calachuchi
Road, Fairview Park, Quezon City.
8. Abbreviations - in order to conserve energies and space, the use of some abbreviations are allowed. However clarity should not sacrificed for brevity and using
abbreviations must confined only to those words of common usages and widely accepted locally or internationally. However in actual report writing we limit the use of
abbreviation to titles, addresses, time and name of agencies referred to as initials.
9. Punctuations – is a customary little marks that determine whether a sentence is clear or has doubtful meaning.
* Kinds of Punctuation
b) Question Mark- use after a question or after that part of sentence which ask question
c) Exclamation Mark- use after an expression of surprise or strong feeling or emotion
d) Comma -used before coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or….) which joins two separate independent clauses.
e) Semicolon- use between two independent clause of a compound sentence when conjunctions such as and, but, not, for, yet, and so are omitted.
g) Quotation Mark- use to set off the exact word spoken or written by other person.
i) Parenthesis- use when numerals are placed in formal enumeration within the sentence
1. Spot Report or Incident Report – It must be prepared and submitted immediately after the preliminary investigation of the incident had been done. It must
briefly answer the cardinal principles of investigation. It shall serve as information of the immediate senior officer of the unit for several purposes, such as:
a. His consumption for an intelligent and responsive decision or plan of action
b. Responses to inquiries by higher officers
c. Responses to inquiries from the media
2. Initial Investigation Report – It consist a brief narration of the facts of the incident answering the cardinal principles of investigation and
enumerating/identifying related found/collected pieces of evidence. It will serve as basis for the incoming investigator to push through or continue with the investigation or
follow – up of the case.
3. Progress Investigation Report – It consist narrative reports of progress as a result of the continuing process of investigation; it may or may not repeat what has
been reported in the initial investigation report unless it shall present a more detailed or references to the new established facts of the case. It shall have the following parts:
I. Authority: It contains the Complaint Number and Case Number (this is observed in bigger police stations) ; or the Police Blotter Entry Number; or
upon whose instructions the investigation has been proceeded.
II. Matters Investigated or Matters to be Investigated – It shall state the nature of the offense, identities of victim/s, their personal data and addresses,
time and place of incident and the identity/ies of the perpetrators, if known.
III. Facts of the Case – It shall state the essential narration of the facts and circumstances together with related and competent testimonies and pieces of
identified and marked physical evidences. Status of victims, arrested suspects and evidences.
IV. Discussion – It contains related laws violated that would probably establish a prima – facie case against the accused and that complainant/victim has
sufficient grounds to establish proof of the accusation or complaint.
VI. Recommendations – It shall contain what the investigator believes the case must be after a careful perusal of the facts, circumstances and evidence
gathered.
Note:
Investigative Reports must contain the annexes identified in the report, such as:
One of the stages of an investigative process where the facts, incidents and circumstances are recalled and narrated by a person who has personal knowledge
surrounding the commission of the offense under investigation. It serves as a permanent record.
Appropriate tools and related requirements are used by an investigator in order that justice prevails.
Sworn Statement – it is a narration of facts and circumstances surrounding the commission of a crime, the declarant have knowledge thereof. The questions are
propounded exhaustively and controlled by the investigator in order to establish complete information the declarant has to say. All answers to the questions must not be
in an implied manner, meaning, the answer of “Yes” or “No” must be avoided.
Affidavit – is a narration of facts prepared by the Affiant himself of what he believes about an incident. This is often considered self – serving meaning it is “one – sided”
or beneficial only to the Affiant himself. To test personal knowledge – the Affiant must be subjected to cross-examination before the court or any administrative body that
has jurisdiction over the case under scrutiny.
Deposition – It is information from a deponent in answer to interrogatories from both parties of the case under the order of a court or body handling the case.
They are the party who stands to be benefited in the suit or the party entitled to the avails of the suit.
a) Plaintiff (civil)/Complainant (criminal) – those having intent in the subject matter of the action or in obtaining the relief demanded.
b) Defendant (civil)/Accused (criminal) – persons who claim an interest in the controversy necessary to complete the determination or settlement of the questions
involved therein.
a. Offended party
b. Any peace officer
c. Other public officers charged with the enforcement of the law violated
a. To inform the accused of the nature and cause of accusation against him.
b. To notify the accused of the criminal acts imputed to him so that he can duly prepare his defense.
Characteristics of a Sworn Statement:
a. Miranda Doctrine (Sec. 12, Art. III of the 1987 Phil. Constitution
b. RA No. 7438
c. Use of humane and good rapport
d. Appropriate dialect, language
a. Investigator taking down the sworn statement of the witness or victim must have a complete idea or information about the facts of the case;
c. Begin the investigation with an interview or preliminary conversation. The purpose is to determine whether or not the witness has knowledge about the incident.
d. Questions using the Five (5) W’s and l H must not be limited to one or two questions when the situation requires adapting several questions especially when the declarant
appears to be giving a partial answer.
e. Investigator must be guided with the different requisites or elements of the crime as basis for the questions to be propounded.
g. The questions propounded must be sequential according to the chain of events the declarant has narrated.
h. Questions raised must be simple and in the dialect spoken and understood by the declarant.
i. Sometimes, intentional mistakes done by the investigator as an strategy is allowed in order that declarant shall make the necessary corrections and consequently shall serve as
proof that declarant has proofread it. This is allowed provided no thoughts shall have been included except those that declarant has narrated.
j. The use of profane and deceiving tactics in the process is not allowed and must be avoided.
k. After the taking of the sworn statement, the declarant must be instructed to read his sworn statement and make necessary corrections, if any. Sign it and to subscribe the
same before an officer allowed by law to administer oath, otherwise the sworn statement shall be considered a mere scratch of paper.
l. If a relative is around, the relative can sign as a witness to the taking of the sworn statement.
VII. Glossary
COURT DUTIES
Investigators are responsible for preparing cases for court and presenting testimony in court. Their role is critical in the quest for justice. From the receipt of the
initial complaint to court appearance, investigators play a key role in a criminal justice system.
1. Review and evaluate all evidence, positive and negative - Concentrate on proving the elements of the crime and on establishing the offender’s identity.
2. Review all reports on the case – Review all written reports done during the completion of the investigation.
3. Prepare Witnesses – Re - interview witnesses to refresh their memories. Read their previous statements to them and ask if this is the evidence they will present
in court.
3. Final Preparations – Shortly before the trial, again review your notes and your
final report. Take with you only those notes you want to use in testifying. Check to be certain that the physical evidence is being taken to the courtroom and will be
available for the prosecuting attorney when needed. Also make sure that laboratory technicians are available to appear when they are required
1. Judge – presides over the trial, rules on the admissibility of the evidence and procedures, keeps order in the court, interprets the law and passes sentence if the
defendant is found guilty.
2. Prosecutor – controls the prosecute of the criminal case and represent the state in prosecuting the law violated.
4. Complaining Witness (victim) – Testifies and establish proof that a law has been violated, there was an intrusion to his/her constitutional rights and that the
defendant is liable thereof.
G. Sequence of a Criminal Trial – The trial begins with the case being called from the court docket. If both the prosecution and the defense are ready, the case is presented
before the court.
The sequence in a criminal trial is as follows:
Direct Examination – is the initial questioning of a witness or defendant by the lawyer who is using the person’s testimony to further his or her case.
Cross – Examination – is questioning by the opposing party for the purpose of assessing the validity of the testimony.
H. Testifying under Direct Examination – As witness, what is at stake is your credibility, professionalism, competence, judgment, conduct in the field, adherence to official
policies, observance of defendant’s rights and knowledge.
What are nonverbal factors? – This pertains to the appearance, look and movements an officer appears in court, this includes: dress, eye contact, posture, gestures, distance,
mannerisms, rate of speech and tone of voice.
J. Testifying under Cross – Examination - Cross – examination is usually the most difficult part of testifying. The defense attorney will attempt to cast doubt on your direct
testimony in an effort to win an acquittal for the defendant. During cross –examination the defense attorney might:
K. Concluding Your Testimony – Do not leave the stand until instructed to do so by the counsel or court. As you leave the witness stand, do not pay special attention to the
prosecution, defense counsel, or defendant. Return immediately to your seat in the courtroom or leave the room if you have been sequestered. If you are told you may be
needed for further testimony, remain available. If told you are no longer needed, leave the courtroom and resume your normal duties/activities. To remain gives the impression
you have a special interest in the case.
L. Summary
To prosecute or not to prosecute is often a question. Some cases are never prosecuted because the complaint is invalid, it is exceptionally cleared, or no evidence
or leads exist. If the decision is made to prosecute, thorough preparation is required.
Learning Outcomes:
1. Understand the concept of crime scene investigation
2. Recognize the importance of different method of investigation
3. Analyze the methods used and role of SOCO team as part of crime scene investigation
Pre-Test: Identify the word or group of words being referred to by the statements.
1. The physical location where a suspect either commits an illegal act or leaves physical evidence of such act
2. May be defined as the recognition, identification, comparison and evaluation of physical evidence by application of the natural sciences.
3. In this method, the area is blocked out in the form of a rectangle. The three (3) searchers, A,B, and C proceed slowly at the same pace along, paths parallel to one side of the
rectangle.
4. In this method, one searcher is assigned to each subdivision of a quadrant, then each quadrant is cut into another set of quadrants.
5. Is the means, sanctioned by these rules, of ascertaining in a judicial proceeding the truth respecting a matter of fact?
6. The methodology involving the systematic searching, handling, distribution, and accountability of all evidence found at the crime scene.
7. This gives picture of the scene, the crime and its environs, including such items such as neighboring buildings, roads leading to the location or house. In arson cases, it aids in
determining whether the fire was cause by nearby inflammable property.
8. The use of scientific methods, physical evidence, deductive reasoning and their interrelationships to gain explicit knowledge of the series of events that surround the
commission of a crime.
9. Person that Assume control of the crime scene. Ensure the safety of personnel as well as the victim and offenders caught in the scene and secure the crime scene from
kibitzers.
10. Measurements at right angles from each of two walls
BASIC ELEMENTS OF
INVESTIGATING CRIME SCENE
Before a criminal investigation be true, it should include its elements such as recognition, collection, preservation, evaluation and presentation (RCPEP) in the
court.
Recognition involves the efforts of identifying data, including physical things that may provide relevant information regarding the criminal case being investigated.
That is why recognition is otherwise known as identification stage of investigation.
Collection, which refers to the act of gathering those identified data or facts, or physical things that are significant to the case under investigation. Collection maybe
done by scraping the bloodstains found at the crime scene, interviewing the neighbor who saw the burglary, or examination of drug dealer’s bankbook.
Preservation. It is a function that is almost simultaneously performed during the collection stage. It includes act of keeping the collected evidences in their true and
original for, preventing contamination or destruction of its substantive value. Preservation does not only involve the process of packaging physical evidences in order that they
can be safely transmitted to the evidence custodian or to the crime laboratory. It covers the process of maintaining the objectivity of facts or information that has been gathered
from the testimony of witnesses, victims or other persons 0involved in the criminal case.
Presentation is the function that is primarily manifested inside the courtroom. The investigator, with the help of the prosecutor, must be able to present facts and
information in a very simple and convenient manner in order to convince the court and other parties involved in the criminal case about the validity and truthfulness of the
evidences they are trying to prove or establish
= The physical location where a suspect either commits an illegal act or leaves physical evidence of such act.
= Proper handling of physical evidence is necessary to obtain the maximum possible information upon which scientific examination shall be based, and to prevent
exclusion as evidence in court. Specimens which, truly represents the material found at the scene, unaltered, unspoiled or otherwise unchanged in handling will provide more
and better information upon examination.
1. The evidence should reach the laboratory as much as possible in same condition as when it is found.
2. The quantity of specimen should be adequate. Even with the best equipment available, good results cannot be obtained from insufficient specimens.
3. Submit a known or standard specimen for comparison purposes.
4. Keep each specimen separate from others so there will be no intermingling or mixing of known and unknown material. Wrap and seal in individual packages when necessary.
5. Mark and label each piece of evidence for positive identification as the evidence taken from a particular location in connection with the crime under investigation.
6. The chain of custody of evidence must be maintained. Account for evidence from the time it is collected until it is produced in court. Any break in this chain of custody may
make the material inadmissible as evidence.
1. Establish boundaries of the scene, starting at the focal point and extending outward to include:
a. Where the crime occurred.
b. Potential points and paths of exit and entry of suspects and witnesses.
c. Places where the victim/evidence may have been moved.
2. Set up barriers (e.g. ropes, cones, crime scene barrier tape, available vehicles, personnel, other equipment) or use existing boundaries (e.g. doors, walls, gates).
3. Document entry/exit of all people entering and leaving the scene, once boundaries have been established.
4. Control the flow of personnel and animals entering and leaving the scene to maintain integrity of the scene.
5. Effect measures to preserve/protect evidence that may be lost or compromised (e.g. protect from the elements like rain, snow or wind and from footsteps, tire tracks,
sprinklers).
6. Document the original location of the victim or objects that you observe being moved.
7. Consider search and seizure issues to determine the necessity of obtaining consent to search and/or obtaining a search warrant. Establish boundaries as a critical aspect in
controlling the integrity of evidentiary material.
1.Each crime scene is different according to the physical nature of the scene and the crime or offense involved. Consequently, the scene is processed in accordance with the
prevailing physical characteristics of the scene and with the need to develop essential evidentiary facts peculiar to the offense. A general survey of the scene is always made,
however, to note the location of the obvious traces, the probable entry and exit points used by the offenders and the size and shape of the area involved.
2. In rooms, buildings, and small outdoor areas, a systematic search of evidence is initiated. (In the interest of uniformity, it is recommended that the clockwise movement be
used). The investigator examines each item encountered of the floor, walls, and ceiling to locate anything that maybe of evidentiary value. You should:
a. Give particular attention to fragile evidence that may be destroyed or contaminated if it is not collected when discovered.
b. If any doubt exists as to the value of an item, treat it as evidence until proven otherwise.
c. Ensure that the item or area where latent fingerprints may be present is closely examined and that action is taken to develop the print.
d. Carefully protect any impression of evidentiary value in surfaces conducive to making casts or molds. If possible, photograph the impression and make a cast or mold.
e. Note stains, spots and pools of liquid within the scene and treat them as evidence.
f. Treat as evidence all other items, such as hairs, fibers, and earth particles, foreign to the area in which they are found e.g. matter found under the victim’s fingerprints.
g. Proceed systematically and uninterruptedly to the conclusion of the processing of the scene. The search for evidence is initially completed when, after a thorough examination
of the scene, the rough sketch, necessary photograph and investigative notes have been completed and the investigator has returned to the point from which the search began.
Further search may be necessary after the evidence and the statements obtained have been evaluated.
3. In large outdoor areas, it is advisable to divide the are into strips about four (4) feet wide. The policeman may first search the strip on his left as he faces the scene and then
the adjoining strips.
4. It may be advisable to make a search beyond the area considered to be the immediate scene of the incident or crime. e.g., evidence may indicate that a weapon or tool used
in the crime was discarded or hidden by the offender somewhere within a square-mile near the scene.
5. After completing the search of the scene, the investigator examines the object or person actually attacked by the offender. e.g. a ripped safe, a desk drawer that has been
pried or a room from which items have been stolen, would be processed after the remainder of the scene has been examined for traces of the offender. In a homicide case, the
position of the victim should be outlined with a chalk or any other suitable material before the body is removed from the scene. If the victim has been pronounced dead by a
doctor or is obviously dead, it is usually advisable to examine the body, the clothing and the area under the body after the remainder of the scene has been searched. This is to
enable the policeman/investigator toe valuate all objects of special interest in the light of all other evidence found at the scene.
METHODS OF SEARCH
1. STRIP SEARCH METHOD = In this method, the area is blocked out in the form of a rectangle. The three (3) searchers, A,B, and C proceed slowly at the same pace along, paths
parallel to one side of the rectangle. When a piece of evidence is found, the finder announces his discovery and the search must stop until the evidence has been cared for . A
photographer is called, if necessary. The evidence is collected and tagged and the search proceeds at a given signal. At the end of the rectangle, the searchers turn and proceed
along new lanes.
2. THE DOUBLE STRIP OR GRID METHOD OF SEARCH = a modification of the strip search method. Here, the rectangle is traversed first parallel to the base then parallel to the
side.
3. SPIRAL SEARCH METHOD = In this method, the three searcher follow each other along the path of a spiral, beginning on the outside and spiraling toward the center.
4. ZONE SEARCH METHOD = In this method, one searcher is assigned to each subdivision of a quadrant, then each quadrant is cut into another set of quadrants.
5.WHELL SEARCH METHOD = In this method of search, the area is considered to be approximately circular. The searcher, gathers at the center and proceed outward along radii
or spokes. The procedure should be repeated several times depending on the size of the circle and the number of searchers. One shortcoming of this method is the great
increase in the area to be observed as the searchers depart from the center.
COLLECTING EVIDENCE = This is accomplished after the search is completed, the rough sketch finished and photographs taken. Fragile evidence should be collected as they are
found. All firearms found to have tampered serial numbers (SNs) shall be automatically subjected to macro etching at the PNP Crime Laboratory (PNP-CL). A corresponding
report to the Firearms and Explosive Office (FEO) must be made for verification purposes. In the collection, the investigator should touch the evidence only when necessary.
REMOVAL OF EVIDENCE
1. The investigator places his initials, the date and time of discovery on each item of evidence and the time of discovery on each item evidence for proper identification.
2. Items that could not be marked should be placed in a suitable container and sealed.
PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE = It is the investigator’s responsibility to ensure that every precaution is exercised to preserve the physical evidence in the state in which it was
recovered/obtained until it is released to the evidence custodian.
Purposes:
1. It serves as a permanent record of the object in the event subsequent handling alters or destroys it
2. It gives opportunity for the judge to examine evidence which is too dangerous, burdensome or impractical to produce in court.
3. It gives an opportunity for the investigator to review physical evidence in the case without handling the actual objects.
b. Packaging = Physical evidence should be packed in order to prevent loss, tampering, breakage or deterioration. Clean bottles, envelops, bags and other
containers properly sealed will accomplish this purpose.
a. Identification of evidence= In order to have evidence admitted in court, the officer who originally discovered the evidence must identify the items as the
same object found at the scene.
b. Marking of evidence= The investigator generally writes or scratch the following on each item of evidence collected:
= Any physical evidence obtained must be tagged before its submission to the evidence custodian.
d. Sealing of evidence = Placing articles of evidence in a paper or plastic container and sealing it with a tape ensures the object is not improperly handled and
preserves both the legal and physical integrity of evidence. A slip of paper with the appropriate identifying information is either enclosed in the package or
affixed outside.
EVALUATION OF EVIDENCE = Each item of evidence must be evaluated in relation to all the pieces of evidence, individually and collectively.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF EVIDENCE = a process used to maintain and document the chronological history of the evidence. Documents should include name or initials of the
individual collecting the evidence, each person or entity subsequently having custody of it, dates the items collected or transferred, agency and case number, victim’s or
suspect’s name, and a brief description of the item.
= The methodology involving the systematic searching, handling, distribution, and accountability of all evidence found at the crime scene. The documentation of
every article of evidence, from the point of initial discovery at the scene, to its collection and transport to the point of examination, its temporary storage and final disposal.
POINTS TO CONSIDER
1. To establish admissibility, the investigator must have personal observation of the data in question. In other words, the sketch must be sponsored or verified.
2. REMINDER: Sketches are not a substitute for notes or photos; they are but a supplement to them.
3. Types of sketches
12. Critical measurement, such as skid marks, should be checked by two (2) investigators.
13. Measurements should be harmony; or in centimeters, inches, yards, meters. Mixed in one
sketch.
14. use standard symbols in the sketch.
15. Show which way doors swing.
16. Show with arrow the direction of stairways.
17. Recheck the sketch for clarity, accuracy, scale , title, key.
1. SKETCH OF LOCALITY =This gives picture of the scene, the crime and its environs, including such items such as neighboring buildings, roads leading to the location or house. In
arson cases, it aids in determining whether the fire was cause by nearby inflammable property.
2. SKETCH OF GROUNDS = The sketch of grounds pictures the scene of the crime with its nearest physical surroundings (e.g. house with a garden).
3. SKETCH OF DETAILS = The sketch of details describes immediate scene only. For instance, the room in which the crime was committed and the details thereof. Cross
projection method are details of the room wherein walls and ceiling are pictures as if they are on the same place as the floor. This gives a clear impression of the scene in cases
where bloodstains or bullet holes are found in the walls or on the ceiling.
RELEASING THE SCENE = The scene is not released until all processing has been completed. The release should be effected at the earliest practicable time, particularly when an
activity has been closed or its operations curtailed.
The SOCO team is composed of but not limited to the following depending on the nature of the case:
1. Team leader
2. Assistant team leader
3. Photographer and photographic log recorder
4. Evidence and evidence recorder
5. Evidence recorder
6. Evidence recovery personnel
7. Driver/security
1. Team leader
a. Assume control of the crime scene. Ensure the safety of personnel as well as the victim and offenders caught in the scene and secure the crime scene from kibitzers.
b. Conduct initial survey of the crime scene for evaluating potential evidence and narrative description of the place.
c. Determine search patterns to be used and designate assignments to evidence gatherer.
d. Designate command post location in or near the crime scene and ensure exchange of information between searcher and investigator.
e. Coordinate with other law enforcement agencies for the security of the victims, offenders/suspects and the scene of the crime.
f. Ensure that sufficient supplies and equipment are made available for personnel involved in SOCO.
g. Control access to the scene and designate personnel to log persons entering the place and remove Kibitzers in the area.
h. Continuously reevaluate efficiency of the search to ensure that all places are searched properly.
i. Release the crime scene to the investigators handling the case.
4. Sketcher
Perform all sketches necessary during the crime scene processing.
5. Evidence recorder/custodian
a. Prepare evidence recovery log and accomplish chain of custody of evidence.
b. Conduct packaging, preservation and transportation of gathered evidence to the Crime Laboratory.
c. Coordinate evidence nomenclature with sketcher, photographer and evidence gatherer.
d. Receive and record all evidence recovered.
e. Maintain custody and control of evidence.
f. Observe the proper custody of evidence.
g. Coordinate transmittal of evidence to case investigators or to Crime Laboratory per agency guidelines.
EQUIPMENT
1. BASIC EQUIPMENT
a. Crime scene tape or rope (police line)
b. Measuring device – ruler and measuring tape
c. Recording materials = chalk, sketcher and paper pad
d. Camera with film
e. Video camera or tape recorder
f. Evidence collection kit
g. Flashlight
2. EVIDENCE CONTAINERS
a. String tags - large and small
b. Evidence tape or masking tape
c. Roll of manila paper for wrapping
d. Plastic gallon
e. one-half pint bottles/vials – plastic and glass
f. one-fourth pint bottles/vials – plastic and glass
g. Absorbent cottons
h. Rolls of fingerprint tape
i. Plastic bags – different sizes
J. Paper bags – different sizes
5. Miscellaneous
a. Rubber bands
b. Pencils, ballpens, pentel pen – different colors
c. Chalks
d. Permanent flet marker
e. Eraser
f. Stapler with extra staple
g. Assorted paper clip and binders
h. notebooks, paper pads, sketch pads and drawing pads
i. Drawing compass
j. Clippers
k. magnetic directional compass
l. Carbon papers and coupon bonds
= The determination of the actions surrounding the commission of a crime. Careful and competent examination of the physical evidence , the documentation of
the crime scene allows for this determination. The systematic documentation and recording of the crime scene is required for this analysis.
= The use of scientific methods, physical evidence, deductive reasoning and their interrelationships to gain explicit knowledge of the series of events that surround
the commission of a crime.
CRIMINAL RPOFILING = The application of psychological theory to the analysis and reconstruction of the forensic evidence that relates to an offender’s crime scenes, victim’s
behavior. It tends to answer the question “why” or questions regarding the offender’s motive and intent.
TYPES OF RECONSTRUCTION
1. PHYSICAL RECONSTRUCTION = The physical appearance of the crime scene is reconstructed from the description of witnesses and the indication of the physical evidence.
2. MENTAL RECONSTRUCTION = From the physical reconstruction, some conclusions can be made concerning the consistency of the accounts of various witnesses. No
assumption should be made concerning actions which are not supported by evidence. The final theory developed by the investigator should provide a line of investigative action.
STEPS IN RECONSTRUCTION
1. Recognition of evidence is arguably the most important. “Unless the potential evidence can be recognized, no further reconstruction can be carried out.”
2. Documentation and collection of evidence are the heart of any successful scene investigation, and form the basis for the reconstruction.
3. Evaluation of evidence = examination of evidence, possibly following laboratory analysis and looks at what information the evidence provides, and how reliable it is. At this
time, any witness statements should be compared to the evidence to see which part of the statements can be supported or refuted by the evidence.
4. Hypothesize to formulate an idea of “how” the event occurred. This is not merely guess and should be firmly supported by the evidence.
5. Testing to see how the hypothesis developed can be validated. This is accomplished by checking the evidence against known physical laws or devising a test to attempt to
replicate the event (or the relevant segment).
6. Reconstruction to reporting the results of the analysis. The results are reported as a range, where the event or potion of it.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
Learning Outcomes:
1. Understand the concept and definition of Arrest, search, and seizure in relation to criminal investigation
2. know the different methods of search
3. Recognize and appreciate the importance of Raid operation in criminal investigation.
Pre-Test Identify the word or group of words being referred to by the statements.
1. The taking of a person into custody so he can answer for the commission of an offense.
2. An order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a judge and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for personal property
described therein and to bring it before the court
3. A surprise invasion of a building or area. It is small-scale attack of a limited territory
4. It is a self-incriminatory statement by the subject short of acknowledgment of guilt. It is an acknowledgement of a fact or circumstance from which guilt may be inferred. It
implicates but does not incriminate
5. The direct acknowledgement of the truth of the guilty fact as charges or of some essential part of the commission of the criminal act itself. To be admissible, a confession must
be voluntary and trustworthy
6. The purpose is to place the subject in an “off-balance” position requiring the use of both arms and legs to keep him from falling to the ground
7. Subject lies on his stomach with arms and legs outstretched.
8. The application of psychological theory to the analysis and reconstruction of the forensic evidence that relates to an offender’s crime scenes, victim’s behavior
9. Made at or in the interest of national security, such as border checks or checkpoints
10, where the search precedes the arrest, and as allowed on grounds of reasonable suspicion
The term “arrest” came from the Latin word “arrestare” which means “cause to stop” and “restare” which means “stay behind”. These terms were used as early as
during the 14th century.
On the other hand, the word search was derived from the Anglo-Norman word “searcher,” Old French cerchier which means “to explore,” Latin word “circare" which means “go
around in circles.”
TERMS TO UNDERSTAND:
1. Warrant of Arrest is
- an order in writing issued in the name of the
People of the Philippines;
- signed by a judge;
- directed to a peace officer, commanding him to arrest the person designated and take him into custody of the law in order that he may be bound to
answer for the commission of an offense.
2. Warrant Officer is any authorized member from the law enforcement agency usually from the Philippine National Police (PNP) or National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) who
holds a warrant for execution within 10 days from receipt subject to renewal in case of failure to execute the same
3. Alias Warrant refers to the warrant of arrest issued by a judge to the peace officer after returning the original warrant of arrest after the lapse of the 10-day validity period.
4. Search Warrant is another order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by the judge and directed to a peace officer commanding him to search
for personal property and bring it before the court.
5. Richard Doe/ John (Jane) Doe Warrant is a warrant containing no specific person to be arrested but only descriptions based from the testimonies of the victim/s or the
witnesses/es. It contains the physical description of the accused as well as other factors to be considered for the identification of the accused (Sadili & Pena, 1998).
6. Arrest is the actual taking of a person or persons into custody by an authority in order that he/they may be bound to answer for the commission of an offense.
7. Search is the act of examining documents, papers and effects.
8. Complaint is a sworn written statement charging a person or a group of persons of an offense that is subscribed by the offended party such as the victim/s of the offense
committed, or any other peace officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated.
9. Information is an accusation in writing charging a person or a group of persons of an offense that is subscribed by the prosecutor or fiscal. It is substantiated on oath and
includes the name of the party, the offense committed, facts of the offense and other factors relevant. (Curton,1989) .
In Morano vs. Vido, it was held that warrant of arrest may be issued by administrative authorities like the President of the Philippines and the Commissioner of the
Bureau of Immigration and Deportation only for the purpose of carrying out a final finding of a violation of law like an order of deportation or an order of contempt, and not for
the sole purpose of investigation or prosecution.
However, warrant of arrest issued by the BID for purposes of investigation is null and void for being unconstitutional (BOC-CID vs. Judge de la Rosa).
Below are the properties that are subject to seizure:
1. When, in his (peace officer) presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense.
In people vs. Sucro, it was held that when a police officer sees the offense, although at a distance, or hears the disturbance created thereby, and proceeds at once
to the scene thereof, he may effect an arrest without a warrant. The offense is deemed committed in the presence or within the view of the officer.
2. When an offense has just been committed and he (peace officer) has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be
arrested has committed it.
Cases: In Go vs. Maguan, six days after the shooting, as petitioner presented before the San Juan Police Station to verify news reports that he is being hunted, the
police detained him because an eyewitness had positively identified him as the gunman who shot Maguan. The SC held that there was no valid arrest; it cannot be considered as
within the meaning of the offense had just been committed in as much as six days had already elapsed; neither did the policeman have personal knowledge of facts that Go shot
Maguan.
Those who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped
while being transferred from one confinement to another may be arrested by any peace officer or private person without warrant.
4. When the right is validly waived. This is when the person arrested consented to the arrest, despite of no warrant showed, the person is willing to be taken into custody.
Cases: In People vs. Dural, the illegality of the arrest is cured when the accused files a petition for bail. Appellant is estopped from questioning the illegality of his
arrest when he voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court by entering a plea of not guilty and by participating in the trial. (People vs. Lopez).
Provided that the search is contemporaneous to the arrest and within the permissible area. A person lawfully arrested may be searched
for dangerous weapons or anything, which may be used as proof of the commission of an offense, without search warrant.
The warrantless search and seizure, as an incident to a lawful arrest, may extend beyond the person of the one arrested to include the
premises or surroundings under his immediate control.
In Posadas vs. CA, the SC upheld the validity of a search made by police officers on one who, confronted by the police because he was acting suspiciously, ran away.
But in People vs. Rodriguez, the arrest and consequent search of the accused, simply because “he was acting suspiciously” was held invalid.
The search involves illegal entry of “smuggled goods” in our country that may affect the local businesses especially the small time businessmen. The search is
usually conducted by the officers and agents of the Bureau of Customs.
Under the plain view doctrine, police officers can seize articles or objects which inadvertently come to their view without exerting any effort and which object is
incriminatory to the accused. Based from decisions of trial courts, the doctrine includes the five senses of an individual to detect violations of law.
The doctrine requires that a police officer in order to validate the confiscation of an object in plain view must have a right to be in that place and whatever objects
become obvious or apparent without obstruction or impairment may be subject to seizure.
The search of moving vehicles is popularly called as “check points.” This instance of warrantless search cannot be done anytime. The “checkpoints” must be done
during “abnormal times” when the public welfare is at stake. Thus, every vehicle that passes the certain checkpoint can be searched without search warrant
Inspectors of a certain building for the purpose of maintaining sanitation, fire and building regulations are required to enter every building as well as every room
necessary to be inspected without arming themselves with search warrant. The inspectors need not be armed with search warrant to enter the premises or rooms of the
building to be inspected.
If the person submitted himself voluntarily to be searched, it is good, as there is a search warrant because of the consent of the person to be
searched. The consent of the person must not have been because of intimidation, threat of the person making the search. Thus, the Supreme Court held that in the cases of:
People vs. Omaweng, the accused while driving a vehicle, was stopped at a checkpoint, and when the vehicle was inspected, the soldiers asked
permission to see the contents of a bag which was partially covered by a spare tire. The accused consented, and upon inspection, the bag was found to contain marijuana. The
SC ruled that there was valid waiver.
In People vs. Ramos, the SC said that the evidence for the prosecution clearly disclosed that Ramos voluntarily allowed himself to be frisked, and that
he gave the gun to the police voluntarily; thus, there was a valid waiver.
However, in People vs. Barros, the “silence of the accused” during the warrant less search was not construed as consent.
ARREST = The taking of a person into custody so he can answer for the commission of an offense.
Duty of Arresting Officer = It shall be the duty of the officer executing the warrant without unnecessary delay to arrest and to deliver him to the nearest police station or jail.
2. Methods of Arrest
a. With Warrant of Arrest = The officer shall inform the person to be arrested of the cause of the arrest and of the fact that a warrant has been issued for his arrest, except when
he flees or forcibly resist before the officer has opportunity so to inform him or when the giving of such information will imperil the arrest. The officer need not have the warrant
in his possession at the time of the arrest but after the arrest, if the person arrested so requires, the warrant shall be shown to him as soon as practicable.
B .Without Warrant of Arrest = The officer shall inform the person to be arrested of his authority and the cause of his arrest, unless the person to be arrested is then engaged in
the commission of an offense or is pursued immediately after its commission or after an escape, or flees or forcibly resist before the officer has opportunity so to inform him, or
when the giving of such information will imperil the arrest.
Life of a Warrant of Arrest = A warrant of arrest, even if not served within the statutory period, remains valid unless recalled by the issuing court, or if the accused is arrested or
has voluntarily submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the issuing court, unlike a search warrant which has a lifetime of only ten (10) days from its date of issuance.
1. In general, an arrest can be validly effected only upon lawful order or warrant of a competent court or judge.
a. When, in the law enforcer’s presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense.
b. When an offense has in fact been committed, and the officer has personal knowledge of facts indicating that the person to be arrested has committed it.
c. When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or temporary
confined while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.
d. If a person lawfully arrested escapes or is rescued, any person may immediately pursue or retake him without a warrant at any time and in any place within
the Philippines.
e. When the arrest is made by a bondsman for the purpose of surrendering the accused.
f. When the accused released on bail attempts to leave the country without court permission.
g. Violation of conditional pardon, punishable under Article 159 of the Revised Penal Code.
1. This is the responsibility of the chief team leader or officer acting in his absence.
2. If the arresting party is composed of two (2) or more members, somebody must be placed in charge, preferably the most experienced.
3. Consider the arresting party and covering party.
4. Consider protection of innocent bystanders.
5. Prevent escape of subject.
6. Make a discreet reconnaissance of the area.
7. Determine weapons and equipment needed.
8. Consider superiority of manpower and firepower.
9. Make the plan simple enough to be understood by the least experienced
operative/investigator.
10. Consider the element of SURPRISE (Daybreak has proven satisfactory for a number of
successful arrest).
11. Consider overall coordination.
12. Consider concealment or cover that might be available both in effecting the arrest and
removing the subject from the building.
13. The briefing officer should ask the participants if they have any questions regarding the
plan.
WHO MAY EXECUTE ARREST? Among others, members of the PNP and the NBI may effect arrest.
1. In general, an arrest is made by an actual restraint of the person to be arrested, or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.
= No violence or unnecessary force shall be used in making an arrest, and the person arrested shall not be subjected to any greater restraint than is necessary for
his detention (Sec. 2, Rule 113).
2. Making the arrest = Use good judgment in connection with the arrest and assume that the subject is armed and will take your life if given an opportunity.
PERIODS WITHIN WHICH PERSON ARRESTED WITHOUT A WARRANT SHOULD BE CHARGED IN THE PROPER FORUM
= Executive Order No. 272. Dated 25 July 1987, amended Article 25 of the RPC by extending the period authorized to detain a person prior to delivery to the judicial
authority, to wit:
a. six (6) to twelve (12) hours for crimes or offenses punishable with light penalties.
b. nine (9) to eighteen (18) hours for crimes or offenses punishable with correctional penalties; and
c. eighteen (18) to thirty-six (36) hours for crimes or offenses punishable with afflictive or capital penalties.
= Executive Order No. 155, dated 30 March 1987, amending Republic Act No. 857, penalizes any public officer who deprives a person of his right to counsel. The
penalty shall be rison correctional or imprisonment of six (6) months and one (1) day to six (6) years.
SEARCH = An examination of an individual’s person, house, papers or effects, or other buildings and premises to discover contraband or some evidence of guilt to be used in the
prosecution of a criminal action.
SEARCH WARRANT = An order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a judge and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for
personal property described therein and to bring it before the court (Sec 1, Rule 126).
ITEMS TO BE SIEZED = A search warrant may be issued for the search and seizure of the following personal property:
a. Property subject of the offense;
b. Property stolen or embezzled and other proceeds or fruits of the offense; and
c. Property used or intended to be used for committing an offense. (Sec 2, Rule 126).
F. 3 Another document which is made after a search is a CERTIFICATION OF PROPERTY SEIZED. This is signed by the owner of the seized property, and would seem to fall more
under the court pronouncement above than the “Receipt for Property Seized” does.
G. As much as possible, during the opening of safes, drawers, cabinets, tables, etc,. the lifting of the articles should be done by the owner of the house or his authorized
representative, or by immediate members of his family, to preclude any suspicion of theft or planting of evidence.
H. Thereafter, the officer must immediately deliver the things or property seized to the judge who issued the warrant, together with an inventory duly verified under oath. (Sec
11, Ibid).
2. When the evidence to be seized is in “plain view.” The discovery of the evidence must be inadvertent or unintentional.
3. Customs search or searches made at airports/seaports in order to collect duties. This warrantless search is allowed due to urgency.
4. Search of moving vehicles may be made without a warrant because it would be impracticable to secure a search warrant before engaging in “hot pursuit.”
5. Routine searches made at or in the interest of national security, such as border checks or checkpoints.
6. Stop-and- search or stop-and-frisk, where the search precedes the arrest, and as allowed on grounds of reasonable suspicion.
7. Search incidental to a lawful arrest. A person lawfully arrested may be searched for dangerous weapons or anything may be used as proof of the commission of an offense,
without a search warrant. (Sec 12, Rule 126).
TYPES OF SEARCHES
1. Wall Search = The purpose is to place the subject in an “off-balance” position requiring the use of both arms and legs to keep him from falling to the ground. This is the safest
type of search. It does not necessarily require a wall, any object that can support the weight of the subject (such as a car) can be used. The procedures are:
a. Require subject to place both hands on the wall slightly higher than his waist. Spread hands as far apart as possible. Palms should be placed against the wall,
fingers extended.
b. The subject’s feet must be extended back away from the wall as far as possible. Spread then far apart as possible, toes pointed out. Buttocks should not be on
arched position.
2. Standing Search
a. Raise subject’s hand over his head and spread his feet far apart as possible.
b. This is not recommended because the subject is in the “on-balance” position.
3. Kneeling Search
a. Subject kneels on the ground with hands raise over his head.
b. this is also discouraged for the same reason as the standing search.
4. Prone Search
a. Subject lies on his stomach with arms and legs outstretched.
b. Subject has both arms and legs free and is at all times in an “on-balance” position.
c. Front part of clothing cannot be searched.
d. This can be extremely dangerous if the subject has knowledge of judo.
2. When applying handcuffs, give the following orders to the subject and follow this procedure:
a. First order: “Take your right hand off the wall and place it on your back.” Fasten the handcuff to this hand and firmly hold the other handcuff.
b. Second order: “Move up and put your hand against the wall.” Allow the subject to move closer to the wall, making certain his feet remain back far enough him
“off-balance.”
c. Third order: “Take your other hand off the wall and place it on the small of your back.” Fasten the other handcuff and double-lock both handcuffs.
a. Final order: “Stand up and face the wall.” Help the subject in doing this.
Legal Basis: A raid must be legal, having its basis in lawful process and conducted in a legal manner. This will be in the form of a search warrant or warrant of
arrest. The raid may be in pursuit of a person reasonably believed to be guilty of a felony when it is known that the felony has just been committed.
OBEJCTIVES:
1. Effect an apprehension;
2. Obtain evidence of illegal activity by surprising the offenders in flagrante
delicto; or
3. Recover stolen property.
UNDERTAKING
= As in purely military operations, a raid, to be successful must have the following elements:
1. Mission 5. Orders
2. Reconnaissance 6. Execution
3. Plans
4. Instructions
PLANNING THE RAID
= The success of the raid depends upon intelligent planning and competent implementation. To achieve the necessary elements of surprise, the operation must be
performed surreptitiously and with speed.
a. The terrain and buildings should be subjected to close study.
b. In order to obtain the necessary data for planning, a reconnaissance/surveillance of the place should be conducted.
c. The participants should be informed of the nature of the mission.
d. The specific assignment and position of each member of the raiding party, the tactics to be employed, the equipment and transportation to be used, the
evaluation of possible danger points, and the optimum time to be selected should be stressed.
e. Things to consider when planning a raid:
e.1 Need for surveillance
e.2 Number of individuals to be apprehended. Are they armed? With what? If uncertain, assume they are armed.
e.3 Are photographs and descriptions of subjects available for use in the briefing?
e.4 Determine the physical structure of the place where the criminals are located
e.5 Determine all possible escape routes
e.6 Need to discreetly photograph the place and immediate area
e.7 type of neighborhood where the hideout is located
e.8 Volume and kind of activities in the neighborhood at various times (to
determine the most desirable time to conduct the raid)
e.9 Street plans of neighborhood for possible road blocks
e.10 Do the men have confidence in the ability of the raid leader?
e.11 Consider:
= Speed – in moving into position and the execution of the plan.
= Surprise – catch subject off-guard
= Simplicity – a plan that is easy to remember and understand; this avoids confusion.
e.12 consider dividing the raiding party into:
= Cover group moves into position on first, covers advance of raiding party and avenues of escape
= Raid group: disarm and restrain subjects, searchers premises secures evidence, etc
e.13 Does every member of the raiding party know the raid plan completely? The identities and duties of all?
e.14 What is your move-out plan?
e.15 What are the instructions concerning the use of firearms?
e.16 What are the instructions concerning the possible handling of traffic?
e.17 What are the instructions concerning communications, signals, etc?
e.18 How do you identify each other? Arm band, password, insignia ,etc?
e.19 Make sure your plan avoid cross fires?
e.20 Do you have all the equipment you might need, such as flashlights,
searchlights, vehicles, transceivers, loudspeakers, firearms, teargas, etc.
e.21. Ask each participant to repeat his duties to the raid leader.
RAID OPERATION
= Coordination of individual efforts is an essential element in the success of a raid. The aiding party should act as a team. The members of the team must
thoroughly understand the objectives, the plan of action and the orders. Each man should hold his assigned position until his orders are changed by the team leader. Before
leaving the headquarters to the target, the team leader must conduct a final briefing of personnel. Assembly of the team at a designated area should not be too close to the
target, they must not show the appearance of a formal gathering. The raiders’ vehicle must be safeguarded to prevent its use by the subjects. Vehicles which belong to the
subject should be rendered inoperative by the simplest available means. Men should be posted, depending on the number to cordon the area to prevent possible escape and
restrain people from wandering. In the event that the suspect fails to heed the warning to surrender, entry must be made through one point to avoid mis-encounter. Upon
completion of the raid, guards should be designated to protect the property and to observe or apprehend associates of the suspect. Reassemble at a designated place for a final
accounting of all members of the raiding team.
DON’TS IN A RAID
1. Don’t take unnecessary chances.
2. Don’t underestimate the ability or courage of the subject.
3. Don’t raid when not properly prepared.
4. Don’t endanger the lives of bystanders.
5. Don’t use raiders not well-acquainted with each other.
6. Don’t forget gas masks when employing teargas.
7. Don’t be unnecessary rough on the subject.
8. Don’t shoot to kill unless very imperative.
9. Don’t touch the evidence unless seen by witnesses, or by the owner or occupant of the place.
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
1. Discuss and explain the difference between warrant of arrest and search warrant. What are the procedures of effecting arrest?
2. Discuss the significance of raid operation in the field of law enforcement agencies. How about its disadvantages, elaborate your answer?
3. How do you assess the war on drugs of Duterte administration? What about the extrajudicial killings appealed by the public?
CHAPTER 3
Assessment
A. Identify what is being referred to. You may research for the other answers.
1. Those sufficient facts to convince the judge that circumstances sufficiently exist to establish the need for the issuance of the warrant..
2. A legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial
3. An act which would be an offense against persons or property if it was not for the inherent impossibility of its accomplishment.
4. doctrine that allows an officer to seize evidence and contraband that are found by visible eye during observation
5 forcibly taking any relative of a suspect in exchange for the surrender or appearance of suspect. Includes coercive act of forcing people to transfer or vacate their place of
abode.
6. The purpose is to place the subject in an “off-balance” position requiring the use of both arms and legs to keep him from falling to the ground
7. Subject lies on his stomach with arms and legs outstretched.
8. is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery,
persuasion or fraud of the officer
9. Made at or in the interest of national security, such as border checks or checkpoints
10, act of taking into custody or confiscate personal properties such as: weapon, illicit articles, fruit of crime and contrabands.
B. Answer the following essay form. Elaborate your answer.
1. Discuss the procedure on how to serve a search warrant?
2. Explain the different method of arrest?
3. Explain the different lawful warrantless search and seizure
4. Discuss the method of restraint and Handcuffing
5. Write your idea about raid operation conducted by law enforcement agencies. How are you going to assess its effectiveness in apprehending criminals?
C. Define and explain the following concepts
1. Arrest, search, and seizure (make a table for each definition and classification)
2.Make a simple Illustration of type of search and explanation how it is applied
3. Raid/ Entrapment/ Buy bust operation - movie analysis
D. Multiple Choice: Choice the best answer from the choices provided
1. One of these is not in any manner part of forensic science
a. Odontology b. Victimology c. Medicine d. Photography
2. Decisions may be appealed in any of the following court except…
a. Supreme court b. Intermediate appellate court c. RTC d. MTC
3. In “polygraph examination”, the term “examination” means a detection of
a. Forgery b. Emotion c. the mind d. deception
4. A public officer or employee, when not being authorized by judicial order, shall enter a dwelling against the will of the owner thereof is committing:
a. legal entry b. Illegal entry c. Violation of domicile d. Trespassing
5. It is the investigator responsibility to ensure that every precaution is exercised to preserve physical evidence in which it was recovered/ obtained until it is released to the
evidence custodian.
a. Tagging of evidence b. preservation of evidence c. Evaluation of evidence d. Releasing of evidence
6. Is a sworn statement charging a person with an offense, subscribe by the offended party, any peace officer or other employee of the government in charge of the enforcement
or execution of law violated.
a. Deposition b. Complaint c. Police blotter d. Information
7. Evidence is admissible when it is a relevant to the issue and NOT excluded by these rules.
a Real Evidence b. Admissibility of evidence c. Secondary evidence d. Relevancy of evidence
8. The fundamental responsibility of the officer in charge of protecting the crime scene is
a. Interrogating the witness b. Engaging in search for traces left by the criminal c. Removal of evidence which may be prone important to the case d.
Preserving the site of the crime in the same physical condition as it was left by the perpetrator.
9. A person undergoing criminal investigation enjoys his three constitutional rights
a. the right to oppose whatever the accusation on him b. The right to plea guilty and not guilty
c. The right to oppose whatever accusation on him based on his constitutional rights
d. The right to remain silent, right to counsel and right to informed of the nature of the accusation
10. The adjudication by the court that the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the offense charged and the imposition of penalty provided by law on the defendant who pleads or
is found guilty thereof.
a. Judgment b. Information c, Confession d. Admission