Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FINALGROUP3
FINALGROUP3
A RESEARCH
Presented to
The faculty of Notre Dame Diadiangas University – General Santos City
Ma’am Rosemarie Inclan
In partial fulfillment
Of the requirements of the course
Information Technology 1 – Group 3
By
September 2022
Wilbur Lang Scramm’s Biography
- As you can see, It’s a cycle where the Sender/Source (encoder) is also the Receiver and
the Receiver (Decoder) is also the Sender.
- When a sender transmits information to a receiver, the recipient must interpret it as the
sender wishes and reply or give feedback in accordance with that interpretation. Any
communication that is incomplete and ineffective is because the sender does not receive
feedback.
How does this model apply on our lives?
• A misunderstanding could end in disaster.
• It's crucial that we hear what others are saying as well as transmit it in order to completely
comprehend their viewpoints.
• In this situation, the participants in a conversation should be receptive to other people's
suggestions, let the speaker to finish, and wait for your turn to weigh in on the subject.
• By keeping Schramm's model of communication in mind, everyone of us has the opportunity to
share our thoughts and opinions.
1st Example
How was the party, How did it go?
Brit: Not enough alcohol was served, and everyone departed early.
Script:
(Britt makes it sound like the celebration wasn't a big success. She does not state this explicitly.
Instead, it is an implicature—an indirect or suggested response to the query. The only
linguistically encoded meaning of Brit's words—" Not enough alcohol was served " and "
everyone departed early "—is the plain content of her statement.)
2nd Example
Do you want some supper?
Sue: I've had food.
Script:
(Sue wants to say that she has eaten dinner this evening, and Jim will interpret that as what she
has said.)
Script:
(And that’s how this model of communication works where both sender and receiver give a cycle
of information to one another)
- According to this communication model, the message must be encoded and decoded by
both the sender and the recipient. This is to guarantee that the message was properly and
successfully interpreted.
3rd Example
In this case, the sender is "Ally", and "Joey" is the receiver
“Invitation to the party”
Ally: Joey Come to my party next week.
Joey understood the message overall, but not all of it. Ally needs to receive feedback from Joey.
Joey: Sure thing Ally.
- Now that the feedback has been sent, Joey will send it and Ally will get it. As they work
to interpret the message, they will keep switching between the roles of transmitter and recipient.
4th Example
In this case, the sender is "Jelaine", and "Angelica" is the receiver
“Messaging through cellphone”
Jelaine: Angelica?
Angelica: yes?
Jelaine: Are you busy? Do you want to hang out?
Angelica: Sure! Would you like me to come over?
Jelaine: Yes
Script:
(The sender here is Jelaine since she initiates the conversation by asking “angelica?”, then
Angelica the receiver of the message responded to Jelaine by messaging ‘yes?’ and this is called
feedback, after that the sender asks the receiver if she would like to hang out, then angelica
responded “sure” then she also ask a question to the receiver which makes angelica now the
sender and Jelaine is now the receiver of the message then Jelaine responded with a “yes” which
is a feedback from the sender.)
- Now there is an effective communication here as both the sender and the receiver
encoded and decoded the message properly. The message was interpreted correctly and
effectively.
Conclusion:
Compared to the communication models of Aristotle, Berlo, Shannon, and Weaver,
Schramm's approach is more practically useful.
This approach can be thought of as combining both traditional and contemporary
components, such as feedback and semantic noise. Compared to earlier communication models,
it has more useful uses.