Professional Documents
Culture Documents
C1GravitySewers PDF
C1GravitySewers PDF
COLLECTION SERIES
Wastewater source
Road
Gravity building
sewer from source
Sewer
lateral
Properly designed and constructed gravity sewers are a viable collection option for urban areas, but
can be expensive for small communities. In its purest form (i.e., uniform slope from service connections to
treatment components) gravity is an inexpensive means to convey water. However, the topography is rarely
conducive to purely gravity flow, and lift stations must often be included. The cost of gravity sewers may be
prohibitive unless there is sufficient population density to justify the installation.
Page
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEMS C1
2
Compatibility with the Community Vision
Installation costs for gravity sewers are significant. Selecting any wastewater
The community must have a good vision of its future to collection option must be
ensure that the sewer is properly sized. If the capacity for considered within the context
long-term use is built into the design, the system can of a community’s broad, long-
range plans for land use.
accommodate the anticipated growth for the next 50 or more
Changes in development
years. Realistically, over-building the sewer means that the
patterns, population density,
current users will bear the cost of that future use.
livability, and delivery of
Once installed, the components of a gravity sewer
services will occur as a result
are minimally visible. Manhole lids and lift stations will be of the choices made and these
evident at the surface but are not obtrusive. Odors may be must all be taken into account.
associated with access points and odor control may be
necessary. The potential loss of trees or other local charm during installation must be considered because of
the need for broad and deep cuts during excavation. For this reason, it is a common practice to install sewers
under paved roads resulting in severe and lengthy community disruption.
When considering options for a Management Program, the community must decide whether on-lot
costs for installation, maintenance and repair will be borne directly by the landowner or spread across the
community.
www.werf.org
Page
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEMS C1
4
Proper maintenance includes periodic line repairs and inspection, cleaning out blockages, and
repairing areas where significant infiltration is occurring. On an approximate 10-year rotation, each sewer line
should be inspected via a down-the-hole closed-circuit camera so that areas needing repair can be identified.
Service providers must have the knowledge and skills related to sewer cleaning technologies and the
associated safety precautions. Operators must have proper training and may be subject to certification
requirements depending upon jurisdiction.
Table 1. Estimated cost to the lot owner if utility does not cover the materials and installation of on-lot
components.
Annual O&M Annualized cost to clean building sewer $16 - $24 per yr
The costs provided in this document are for comparison purposes only. The actual costs
will vary significantly depending on site conditions and local economics. For localized cost
investigations, consult the Cost Estimation Tool associated with these materials.
www.werf.org
Page
GRAVITY SEWER SYSTEMS C1
6
Table 2. Estimated cost of materials and installation to build the collection network not
including the on-lot components.
Network Cost 5,000 gpd or 20 homes 10,000 gpd or 40 homes 50,000 gpd or 200 homes
Annual electricity Lift stations are the primary energy demand for gravity collection systems
Table 3. Estimated cost of materials and installation for utility to install both the collection network and
on-lot components
Network and On-Lot Cost 5,000 gpd or 20 homes 10,000 gpd or 40 homes 50,000 gpd or 200 homes
Total Cost per lot $11,700 - $17,600 $11,700 - $17,600 $12,000 - $18,000
These materials were reviewed by a WERF Project This Fact Sheet was prepared by members of the
Subcommittee including: Consortium of Institutes for Decentralized Wastewater
Treatment (CIDWT),
including:
James F. Kreissl, USEPA ORD, retired
Environmental Consultant
Michael Hines, MS, PE John R. Buchanan, PhD, PE
Southeast Environmental Engineering, LLC University of Tennessee
Thomas W. Groves Nancy E. Deal, MS, REHS
NE Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission (NEIWPCC) NC State University
Larry Stephens, PE David L. Lindbo, PhD, CPSS
Stephens Consulting Services, PC
NC State University
Barbara Rich, REHS
Environmental Consultant
Adrian T. Hanson, PhD, PE
John (Jack) Miniclier, PE New Mexico State University
Charles City County, VA David G. Gustafson, PE
Elke Ursin University of Minnesota
Florida Department of Health Randall J. Miles, PhD
Eberhard Roeder, PhD, PE University of Missouri
Florida Department of Health
4/10 Water Environment Research Foundation 635 Slaters Lane, Suite G-110 Alexandria, VA 22314-1177 www.werf.org