Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Answers To Reviewers
Answers To Reviewers
Answers To Reviewers
2022
2. The Data utilised is from the DGH project. It is outside the OIL business
areas. The permission from DGH has already been secured even before
the abstract was sent to CTSA for review.
Reviewer-1
The paper being written is not The whole paper is not going to be
convincing, though, the topic is very submitted. Only the one page (500
relevant but some more convincing words) abstract is going to be
examples or findings surrounding the submitted.
Basin or any analogy may be included. The examples talks about Irawady
Delta and the recent discovery by
harbour energy, The Main body talks
about Zawtika, Yadana, Yetagun Gas
fields (With figure in Page 7 (Just
before Summary).
Also Supergiant Arun field is also
discussed with its size and other
parameters.
That’s pretty much available in and
around Andaman study area from
very recent discovery by Harbour
Energy to past.
Moreover, the data belongs to DGH as The authors have already secured the
of now, in such case, OIL may be permission from DGH to publish this
allowed I write a paper or not is to be Abstract before submitting the
examined. manuscript to CTSA. In the past, one
of the authors has published two (2)
papers with AEG, Mumbai. The data
for both the papers were data
acquired by OIL for DGH under
National Seismic Programme in NC
Hills and Mizoram.
Moreover, the author has claimed The author has supported this by one
that several gas related signatures are seismic section pasted in the
observed in newly acquired seismic manuscript. Normally, Abstracts are
data, however, no seismic sections / devoid of any images and hence the
maps/any other figures in support of authors restrained themselves of
that are enclosed. putting any seismic in abstract.
In the below table, Authors have got three (3) columns. Third Last Column is
submitted is originally submitted by Authors for CTSA, Second Last column is
Views of Reviewer -2 and Last column is the Comments from authors on the
Reviewer-2 observations.
Reviewer-2
ANNEXURE-2
Spellings /
13 Checked Yes Yes OK
Typographic errors
Map / Figures Only relevant information
14 Not Applicable yes OK
/Table contents pertaining to the text
North Not Applicable Not in All
Map Convention
15 Scale Not Applicable Not in All
Used Abstract does not
Legend Not Applicable Not in All
have any Map or
Scale Not Applicable Not in All
Figure hence NO
Figure Convention question of any
16 map convention.
Used Legend Not Applicable Not in All
Thanks
Authors.