Answers To Reviewers

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

18.10.

2022

Respected Reviewers / CTSA members


Thanks for the kind review and fast turnaround. Here are the answers to the
questions raised by Reviewers.

Authors would like to make two (2) points here.

1. The requirement of the conference is only a 500 word abstract. There


would never be a requirement of an extended abstract. The guidelines
say that “India Energy Week does not require authors to submit their
technical papers, as we do not publish these”.

If the abstract is accepted, authors would be asked to prepare a slide


pack.
This is also mentioned in the “”guidelines for abstract””, pasted below.

2. The Data utilised is from the DGH project. It is outside the OIL business
areas. The permission from DGH has already been secured even before
the abstract was sent to CTSA for review.
Reviewer-1
The paper being written is not The whole paper is not going to be
convincing, though, the topic is very submitted. Only the one page (500
relevant but some more convincing words) abstract is going to be
examples or findings surrounding the submitted.
Basin or any analogy may be included. The examples talks about Irawady
Delta and the recent discovery by
harbour energy, The Main body talks
about Zawtika, Yadana, Yetagun Gas
fields (With figure in Page 7 (Just
before Summary).
Also Supergiant Arun field is also
discussed with its size and other
parameters.
That’s pretty much available in and
around Andaman study area from
very recent discovery by Harbour
Energy to past.

Moreover, the data belongs to DGH as The authors have already secured the
of now, in such case, OIL may be permission from DGH to publish this
allowed I write a paper or not is to be Abstract before submitting the
examined. manuscript to CTSA. In the past, one
of the authors has published two (2)
papers with AEG, Mumbai. The data
for both the papers were data
acquired by OIL for DGH under
National Seismic Programme in NC
Hills and Mizoram.
Moreover, the author has claimed The author has supported this by one
that several gas related signatures are seismic section pasted in the
observed in newly acquired seismic manuscript. Normally, Abstracts are
data, however, no seismic sections / devoid of any images and hence the
maps/any other figures in support of authors restrained themselves of
that are enclosed. putting any seismic in abstract.
In the below table, Authors have got three (3) columns. Third Last Column is
submitted is originally submitted by Authors for CTSA, Second Last column is
Views of Reviewer -2 and Last column is the Comments from authors on the
Reviewer-2 observations.

Reviewer-2
ANNEXURE-2

Corresponding Comments from


REVIEWER-2
Sr. No Item Preferred Benchmark Author Author
Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No
1 Length of Paper <30 Pages Yes yes OK
Preferably around 500 Title length is not
words. To adhere to the counted, so
2 Abstract Length Yes 503 words
specifications of the abstract is less
journal/conference than 500 words.
Only 1 page
abstract would be
submitted. The
Extended Abstract
3 5-6 Pages Not Applicable 7 pages rest of the 6 pages
Length
were only to
understand the
Context.
4 Unit of Measure Metric Yes Matric OK
5 Abbreviations Only for units of Measure Yes Yes OK
6 Figure Numbering only Numerical Not Applicable Yes OK
7 References All References in the text Not Applicable Yes OK
Manuscript Title, Authors, Abstract,
8 Only Abstract Yes OK
Organisation Text including conclusions
Acknowledgement
is not written in
Abstract and
9 Acknowledgments OIL to be acknowledged Not Applicable No
hence NO
acknowledgement
has been made.
Names/ Nos. of
Camouflaging with alpha-
wells, seismic
10 alpha / alphanumeric Not Applicable Yes OK
profiles, logs,
system.
samples, etc.
Latitude and Only degree (No Minutes
11 Not Applicable Yes OK
Longitude / Seconds
This is outside
OIL’s acreage.
Outside OIL’s This is DGH area of
Restrict to OIL’s acreage
12 Area of Study acreage. It’s DGH’s No study and authors
holding
field of study. have DGH
permission to
publish the
abstract.

Spellings /
13 Checked Yes Yes OK
Typographic errors
Map / Figures Only relevant information
14 Not Applicable yes OK
/Table contents pertaining to the text
North Not Applicable Not in All
Map Convention
15 Scale Not Applicable Not in All
Used Abstract does not
Legend Not Applicable Not in All
have any Map or
Scale Not Applicable Not in All
Figure hence NO
Figure Convention question of any
16 map convention.
Used Legend Not Applicable Not in All

17 Graph Convention Axes Labelling Not Applicable NA OK


Seismic section is
Cross sections / Directions and Time
18 Not Applicable No not part of the
Seismic Section Depth Axes
Abstract.
19 Photo Micrograph Scalar bar Not Applicable NA OK
Cross referencing
is not done in
Cross Referenced Suitable acknowledgment
20 Not Applicable No abstract. This is
material made
mostly done in the
body of the paper.
21 Map / Figures Size A-4 size Not Applicable NA OK
Views expressed are
Statement from authors Yes Submitted
those of authors only
Data utilised to affect OIL’s
Not to be incorporated No OK
business interest

Hope this clears all queries.

Thanks

Authors.

You might also like