Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación

General Guide for the Development of the Practical Component of the Course:
Testing and Evaluation in ELT, 518023

1. General Information of the Practical Component

Learning strategy: Phase-Based on Learning

Course type: Methodological
Evaluation moment: Intermediate
Highest score of the component: 100 points
Number of activities of the practical component registered in this guide: 1
With the development of this component students are expected to achieve
the following learning outcomes:
Develop of their practices process in simulated situations in English language
teaching and learning.

2. General Activity Description of the Practical Component.

Scenarios of the practical component: In situ (practice)

Activity type: Individual
Activity number: 4
Highest score of the activity: 100 points
The activity starts on: Wednesday, The activity ends on: Sunday, November
November 9, 2022 27, 2022
The resources required for the development of this activity are the following:
Email
 Virtual campus
 Pedagogical and Educational Practice Simulator
 Analysis of the information
 Formats of the traceability of pedagogical and educational practice
 The activity consists of:

Comply with the completion and responsible updating of the immersion pedagogical
practice forms established in each one of the intermediate phases of the course and
analysis of the application of the tests in the educational institution.

 Development of the activity of the Pedagogical Practices Simulator

The Pedagogical Practices Simulator as an academic tool that allows undergraduate

students to propose and carry out simulated pedagogical and didactic practices,
1
leveraged in problem situations, to strengthen competencies inherent to the training
of graduates that they can then apply in their field practices in different learning
environments.

The student must carry out the simulator activity, and send evidence in the final
work.

1. Reflection:

 Student must make a reflection of the entire immersion practice process carried
out during the academic period. (Approximately 450 words)

Each student must enter to the simulator and develop the activities proposed.

2. Information analysis:
The student must make an analysis of the evaluations carried out in the
educational institution, or strategy where he/she carried out his/her practices
process.

 A brief description of why the assessment activity was undertaken

 A brief description of the major, goals, objectives and intended learning
outcomes
 An explanation of how the analysis was done and what methodology was used
 A discussion of how results were being used for improvement

Create a drive to upload the immersion practice traceability formats

The student must generate from his/her institutional mail in drive the folder for the
load of formats of practice and evidences of the development of his/her immersion
practice (verify that the link is public so that both the course director and the
teachers can access to the information recorded in this), and share the link with their
teacher UNAD. –

See the instructions on how to create a folder on drive from the institutional mail,
here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1veMhdpNmV7jFoDhKYWJAVHR6RfYTduBT

2
3:

Upload the following formats named according to the following way.

 1. Carta de presentación_Nombre del estudiante.

 2. Certificado ARL_nombre del Estudiante.
 3. Plan de trabajo_Nombre del estudiante.
 4. Formato de asistencia lugar de prácticas_Nombre del estudiante
 5. Diarios de Campo_Nombre del estudiante.
 6. Formato sesiones ESAPEC_Nombre del estudiante.
 7. Formato final de practicas_Nombre del estudiante

All formats listed above must be uploaded to the drive; the traceability of the formats
give the endorsement to your process of pedagogical practices

For phase 4, the student must complete a total of 16 hours divided as follows:

Educational Institution 8 Hours

Fulfilling your practice process with students
Course activities 6 Hours
Carrying out the activities of the simulator and the
guide of phase 4
TOTAL 14 Hours
For the development of the practical component consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

N/A
In the Learning Environment, you must:

Send word document with the analysis of the application of the tests in the
educational institution

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:

Send all the course forms with the respective signatures and screenshots of the work
done in the simulator
Evidence of individual work:
The independent evidence to be submitted is:
Word document with the analysis of the application of the tests applied in the
educational institution

3
Development of the Simulation of pedagogical practices
Final delivery of Pedagogical Practice Protocol Formats with the adjustments
requested at the different moments of accompaniment.
Evidence of collaborative work:
No collaborative evidence is required in this activity.

3. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences

For individual evidence, consider the following:

 Each student individually must submit the requested product in the

environment indicated by the teacher.
 Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets
all the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.
Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found on the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:

a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

4. Evaluation Rubric Template

4
Activity type: Individual
Activity number: 4
Evaluation moment: Intermediate
The highest score possible is 100 points
Criteria Performance levels
First evaluation High level: Student makes a reflection of the entire immersion
criterion: practice process carried out during the academic period.
(Approximately 450 words)
Reflection of the
entire immersion If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
practice and 25 points

This criterion Average level: Student partially makes a reflection of the

represents 25 entire immersion practice process carried out during the
points of the total academic period. (Approximately 450 words)
of 100 points of
the activity. If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
and 19 points

Low level: Doesn´t show the student make a reflection of the

entire immersion practice process carried out during the
academic period. (Approximately 450 words.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points

and 12 points
Second evaluation High level: The student performed the analysis of the tests
criterion: applied to the students according to the instructions given in
the activity guide.
Analysis of the tests
applied
If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
This criterion and 25 points
represents 25
points of the total Average level: The student partially performed the analysis
of 100 points of of the tests applied to the students according to the
the activity. instructions given in the activity guide.

5
 If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
and 19 points

Low level: Hardly or doesn´t performed the analysis of the

tests applied to the students according to the instructions given
in the activity guide

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0

points and 12 points
Third evaluation High level: The student delivers the traceability formats of
criterion: the pedagogical immersion practice requested and adjusted.

Deliver of the If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
immersion practice and 25 points
forms requested
Average level: The student delivers the traceability formats of
and adjusted.
the pedagogical immersion practice without adjustments
according to the instructions given in the activity guide
This criterion
represents 25 If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
points of the total and 19 points
of 100 points of
the activity. Low level: Doesn´t delivery of the traceability formats of the
pedagogical practice.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points
and 12 points
Fourth evaluation High level: The student delivers the evidence from the
criterion: analysis of the pedagogical practice simulator.
Evidence from the If your work is at this level, you can get between 20 points
Simulator Tests and 25 points
Result Analysis and
English Language Average level: Partially provides evidence of analysis of
Assessment simulator activities of pedagogical practices.

This criterion If your work is at this level, you can get between 15 points
represents 25 and 19 points
points of the total

6
of 100 points of Low level: Hardly, or does not provide evidence about the
the activity. simulator activities analysis of pedagogical practices.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 0
points and 12 points