FISE / FEB19 / PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION / SUPERVISOR FORM

FACULTY OF INFORMATION SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING

EVALUATION FORM “To be Filled by the Supervisor”
COURSE & CODE
 
PROJECT TITLE

PROGRAMME CODE SUBMISSION DATE

SUPERVISOR'S NAME    
CO-SUPERVISOR'S NAME (if any)  
PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION
(20%)
STUDENT’S NAME  

MATRIC NO.

1. Top section of this form is to be filled by student.

2. Student must submit this form together with thesis draft and logbook to PROJECT Coordinator.
3. Project Supervisor must return immediately to PROJECT Coordinator after evaluation.

PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION (20%)

 FISE / FEB19 / PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION / SUPERVISOR FORM

Marks (M)
Assessment Criteria Marks
1 2 3 4 5
Chapter 1 - Introduction
 Background of Study
Note: Introduction is considered excellent if it
is supported by facts and figures and covering
all necessary elements i.e. contribute to solve
local or global problem
 Problem Statement
Note: Problem statement is considered
excellent if covers: i. Description of research
variables. ii. Problem is complex and iii.
Require the use of fundamental engineering  No element of
knowledge  Only 1 element  Only 2 elements clearly  Only 3 elements  All elements clearly
introduction / 5 *(30)
clearly stated stated clearly stated stated
 Objective provided
Note: Objective is considered excellent if the
covers all the necessary i.e. specific,
measurable, achievable, relevant and time
bound
 Scope

Note: Overview Component (identify the need

or problem – explain brief solution – predict
the result), rational and unambiguous
objectives
Chapter 2 - Literature Reviews
 Relevancy of information  No reference
provided
 Benchmarking  Cover few facts and  Cover most facts and  Cover all necessary  The facts are
 No relevant
 Gap Analysis figures figures facts and figures extremely relevant
facts
Note: Giving value to knowledge that is gain  Comparative study  Comparative study  Comparative study  Comparative study
 No
based on previous based on previous based on previous based on previous
from literature comparative / 5 *(30)
research is research is majorly research is clearly research is clearly
study
minimally stated stated stated stated
Note: Relevancy of information/data for provided
 Gap analysis is  Gap analysis is  Gap analysis is  Gap analysis is
executing project, quoting other author’s idea,  No research
poorly stated moderately stated clearly stated clearly stated
gap shown in
comparative study, benchmarking and gap of
the report
analysis
Chapter 3 Methodology  No research  Study design,  Study design,  Study design,  Study design, / 5 *(30)
 Research method method experimental/ experimental/ sampling experimental/ experimental/
 Reliability of data shown in the sampling procedure, procedure, material and sampling sampling procedure,
report methods and data procedure, material material and
Note: Reliability shows whether we can trust material and
 No reliability analysis are partly and methods and methods and data
the measurement made during the methods and data described data analysis are analysis are
shown in the
experiment/simulation? Reliability is well report analysis are  Reliability is moderately clearly described extremely clearly
described if student discussed the flow, minimally described described  Reliability is well described
 Reliability is poorly described  Reliability is
Note: Proposed product design specifications described extremely described
 FISE / FEB19 / PROPOSAL DOCUMENTATION / SUPERVISOR FORM

(analytical models, simulation, etc) and

descriptions of work (analysis methods):
experimental, survey, etc
 Correctly used
choice of words  Good variation in
and exists good using choice of
 Frequently
 Seldom used and  Correctly used choice transitions between words with good
Format: used wrong
wrong choice of of words with more statements. Has transitions and
 Writing Style choice of
words with more than 10 grammatical more than 5 coherence between
words with
 Grammar than 20 grammatical error but less than or grammatical errors statements.
more than 30
 Compliance to the PROJECT error but less than equal to 20 but less than or  Has less than 5 / 5 *(10)
grammatical
standard/guideline or equal to 30 grammatical errors. equal to 10 grammatical error
errors.
 Write the references in accordance to the grammatical error.  Correct citations grammatical errors. with proper
 Wrong
specific format (i.e. IEEE format)  Wrong citations observed and follow the  Correct citations citations and
citations
observed PROJECT guidelines observed and compliance to
observed
follow the PROJECT
PROJECT guidelines
guidelines
Total Marks /100

Comment:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluated by:

___________________________________ (signature)
Name: Date: