1) The document proposes a new "Fluid Taxation" system to make India's indirect tax structure more progressive and reduce inequality.
2) Under the current GST system, the same tax is levied on goods regardless of a person's income level, placing a relatively heavier burden on low-income groups.
3) The new Fluid Taxation system would adjust GST rates relative to a person's income, with lower rates applied to essential goods purchased by low-income consumers. This aims to bridge the gap between rich and poor and support sustainable development goals.
1) The document proposes a new "Fluid Taxation" system to make India's indirect tax structure more progressive and reduce inequality.
2) Under the current GST system, the same tax is levied on goods regardless of a person's income level, placing a relatively heavier burden on low-income groups.
3) The new Fluid Taxation system would adjust GST rates relative to a person's income, with lower rates applied to essential goods purchased by low-income consumers. This aims to bridge the gap between rich and poor and support sustainable development goals.
1) The document proposes a new "Fluid Taxation" system to make India's indirect tax structure more progressive and reduce inequality.
2) Under the current GST system, the same tax is levied on goods regardless of a person's income level, placing a relatively heavier burden on low-income groups.
3) The new Fluid Taxation system would adjust GST rates relative to a person's income, with lower rates applied to essential goods purchased by low-income consumers. This aims to bridge the gap between rich and poor and support sustainable development goals.
1) The document proposes a new "Fluid Taxation" system to make India's indirect tax structure more progressive and reduce inequality.
2) Under the current GST system, the same tax is levied on goods regardless of a person's income level, placing a relatively heavier burden on low-income groups.
3) The new Fluid Taxation system would adjust GST rates relative to a person's income, with lower rates applied to essential goods purchased by low-income consumers. This aims to bridge the gap between rich and poor and support sustainable development goals.
Keshav N Title: Redefining the indirect tax structure in India Project focus: Sustainable Development Institute: The TVS School, Madurai – 03
One way of looking at economic sustainability:
one of the four pillars of sustainable development, is improving the living standards of people. India is in the same race as well. The disparity between the rich and poor affects a developing economy. Imbalanced taxation further widens this gap. For all the order preserved in the direct tax system, our country’s indirect tax policy is disputable in its structure. Goods and Service tax came into effect replacing all other indirect taxes in the Indian market. While a direct tax, say, income tax, is levied on an individual after estimating their worth, GST doesn’t work the same way. For a train ticket, a truck driver pays the same 12% GST a well-off corporate executive pays. The tax fare, though is considered peanuts by the executive, makes up for a significant chunk of the trucker’s paycheck. This paints a picture of our nation’s economic distress. GST has been identifying itself as a pro-poor stratagem, exempting taxes from day-to-day essentials. Essentials might be enough to keep the impoverished class alive: healthy or not. However, it surely isn’t sufficient to put them out of poverty. How do we bridge this prejudice? Case-in-point: “Fluid-Taxation”. The concept of fluid-taxation tailors the indirect tax rates relative to the financial strata of the consumer. While our existing policies seem completely progressive on a cursory glance, it takes a deeper thought to realize their intricacies. Despite the small enterprises seem to benefit from low GST rates, end of the day, it’s only the consumer’s wallet getting ripped off. Through fluid-taxation, we bring the consumers into the equation. GST is adjusted RELATIVE to the consumer’s income. People are segregated into different income groups to distinguish the tax amount paid by each of them for a single instance. Therefore, the truck driver is cut some slack in his tax obligations. A significant reduction in expenditure for a train ticket need not necessarily turn the tide. But if this ‘reduction’ influences the lives of 36.4cr poor households in every single commodity purchased, it makes all the difference in the world. The fluid-taxation strategy could face backlashes amid political circles since it also accounts for a substantial loss of revenue gained through fixed GST rates. To bridge this gap, let us embark on a retrospect. In 2019, the GDP growth rate took a serious hit by falling to 4.5%. To repair the collapsing economy, the government announced a massive corporate tax rate cut. They attempted to lure in new investors with the reworked tax regulations. It has now been three whole years. The government couldn’t reap any tangible benefits as if anyone has ever benefitted from this rate cut, it is only the top 1% of our country. Moreover, the government also had to face a loss of Rs.1.45 lakh crore. Nonetheless, these bigshots are already making a fortune which makes no notable difference. By implementing the “Fluid-Taxation” policy and coherently notching up the corporate tax for the wealthiest, India will inch towards sustainable development faster than ever. The Goods & Service Tax Act is a fantastic improvisation from its predecessor. Yet, we ought to go miles longer to survive the sea of poverty we’re under. And this might just be the biggest step. Without risk, comes no reward.