Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Psychology of Sport & Exercise


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/psychsport

Physical fitness, cognitive functioning and academic achievement in


healthy adolescents
Barbara Franca Haverkamp 1, 2, *, Jaap Oosterlaan 2, 3, Marsh Königs 3, Esther Hartman 1
1
University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, Groningen, the Netherlands
2
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Clinical Neuropsychology Section, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3
Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Pediatrics, Emma Neuroscience Group, Amsterdam Reproduction &
Development, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Keywords: Purpose: Examine the association between health-related physical fitness (cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular
Physical fitness fitness) and skill-related physical fitness (speed-agility) and both cognitive functions and academic achievement
Cognitive functions in adolescents (12–15 years).
Academic achievement
Methods: Data of 423 Dutch adolescents were analyzed (46.8% boys, age = 13.45 ± 0.43 years). Physical fitness
Adolescents
was assessed using five subtests of the Eurofit test battery measuring cardiorespiratory fitness (20 m Shuttle Run
Test), muscular fitness (Broad Jump and Sit-Ups) and speed-agility (10 × 5 m Shuttle Run Test and Plate Tapping
Test). Cognitive functions were assessed by the Digit Span Task, the Grid Task and an adapted version of the
Attention Network Test. Finally, academic achievement was assessed by two standardized tests assessing
mathematic skills and language skills. Multilevel regression analyses were performed in MlWin to examine the
relations of interest adjusting for sex and age.
Results: Multilevel regression analysis showed that speed-agility was significantly related to visuospatial working
memory (β = 0.159; p = 0.014), information processing and control (β = 0.238; p < 0.001) and interference
control (β = 0.156; p = 0.039), but not to the other cognitive or academic achievement outcomes. Cardiore­
spiratory fitness and muscular fitness were not related to any of the cognitive or academic achievement
outcomes.
Conclusion: The results suggest that skill-related physical fitness is related to cognitive functions and health-
related physical fitness is not. Therefore it can be argued that improved levels of skill-related physical fitness
may lead to improved cognitive functioning.

1. Introduction Venckunas et al., 2017), and this might lead to sub-optimal development
of executive functions and academic achievement.
Physical activity is related to health benefits, including lower risks of As physical fitness refers to a wide range of aspects of health- and
cardiovascular disease and diabetes (Janssen & LeBlanc, 2010). More­ skill-related aspects (Corbin, et al., 2000), it is unclear which aspects of
over, recent evidence indicates that physical fitness, which refers to the physical fitness are associated to cognitive functions and academic
ability to engage in physical activity for a protracted period of time achievement. Health-related physical fitness consists of those compo­
(Martínez-Vizcaíno & Sánchez-López, 2008), is also associated with nents of physical fitness that have a relationship with good health,
better executive functions and academic achievement in adolescents including cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular fitness (Corbin et al.,
(Chu et al., 2019). Executive functions are higher order cognitive skills 2000). Cardiorespiratory fitness refers to the overall capacity of the
that enable goal directed behavior and are an important prerequisite for cardiovascular and respiratory systems and the ability to carry out
successful learning, and are important in the social and psychological prolonged strenuous exercise (Ortega et al., 2008). Muscular fitness
development of adolescents (Diamond, 2013). However, during refers to the capacity to carry out work against resistance (Ortega et al.,
adolescence physical fitness levels decrease (Albon et al., 2010; 2008). Skill-related physical fitness consists of those components of

* Corresponding author. University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Sciences, PO box 196, 9700 AD, Groningen, the Netherlands.
E-mail address: b.f.haverkamp@umcg.nl (B.F. Haverkamp).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102060
Received 31 May 2021; Received in revised form 1 September 2021; Accepted 17 September 2021
Available online 20 September 2021
1469-0292/© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

physical fitness that have a relationship with enhanced performance in obtained from the adolescents and one of their parents/guardians prior
sports and motor skills, including speed-agility abilities (Corbin et al., to participation. Demographics of the participating adolescents are
2000). Speed-agility abilities enable one to quickly move the body and shown in Table 1.
change its direction while maintaining control and balance (Ortega
et al., 2008). 2.2. Measuring instruments
It is suggested that health-related physical fitness optimizes cognitive
functioning and academic achievement, by promoting blood flow and 2.2.1. Physical fitness
synaptic plasticity (Best, 2010) and upregulating brain derived neuro­ Five subtests of the Eurofit test battery (COUNCIL, 1988) were used
trophic factor (BDNF) levels that support the survival and growth of to measure three components of physical fitness: cardiorespiratory
neurons (Gomez-Pinilla & Hillman, 2013). Skill-related physical fitness, fitness, muscular fitness, and speed-agility. Vrijkotte et al. (2007) re­
might optimize cognitive functioning and academic achievement by ported good reliability (rs > 0.75) and satisfactory validity for the
strengthening of the motor-cognition network (Ludyga et al., 2016). Eurofit test battery in adolescents aged 12–16 years.
This network involves neural regions such as the dorsolateral prefrontal Cardiorespiratory fitness was measured with the 20-m Shuttle Run
cortex and the neo-cerebellum that are recruited during performance of Test. This test consisted of running back and forth between two lines 20
motor tasks, and are typically associated with a range of cognitive op­ m apart, within a specific time interval that was indicated by audio
erations (Ludyga et al., 2016). signals. The interval between each audio signal became shorter as the
Recent reviews show that most of the existing literature is focused on test proceeded, and required running speed to increase to comply with
the association between cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive func­ test demands. The test ended when an adolescent failed to reach a line
tions or academic achievement in adolescents (Chu et al., 2019; Don­ prior to the audio signal on two successive trials. The number of
nelly et al., 2016; Ruiz-Ariza et al., 2017; Santana et al., 2017). In the completed tracks was recorded and peak VO2 was computed with the
reviews of Donnelly et al. (2016) and Ruiz-Ariza et al. (2017) it was equation proposed by Barnett et al. (1993) in which peak VO2 is
concluded that there was moderately sized positive associations for calculated in ml.kg-1.min-1 using the formula: 24.2–5* sex (male =
cardiorespiratory fitness and cognitive functioning, including executive 0 and female = 1) – 0.8 *age (years) + 3.4* maximal speed (km.h-1)
functioning. However, Ruiz-Ariza et al. (2017) also showed that reached during the last stage of the test.
speed-agility, motor coordination and perceptual-motor skill could be Muscular fitness was determined by measuring strength in the lower
potential predictors of cognitive functioning and academic performance extremities and core strength. Strength of the lower extremities was
in adolescents. In addition, other studies suggested that learning new measured with the Broad Jump Test. Participants stood behind a line
skill-related physical fitness items seemed to be associated to cognitive with their feet slightly apart. They used a two-foot take-off to jump as far
functions and especially executive functions (Moreau et al., 2015; Pesce as possible. Adolescents got two attempts, of which the longest distance
et al., 2013; Schmidt et al., 2015). In the reviews of Chu et al. (2019) and jumped (in cm) was recorded as the test result. Core strength was
Santana et al. (2017) it was concluded that there was evidence for a measured with Sit-Ups where adolescents had to touch the floor with
moderately sized positive relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness their shoulders and sit back up again while the elbows touched the
and academic achievement. However, in previous studies most often knees. Knees were required to be in an angle of 90◦ and arms needed to
only one aspect of physical fitness was examined and evidence for other be crossed in front of the chest. The amount of sit-ups performed within
aspects of physical fitness (e.g. muscular fitness, speed-agility) are 30 s was recorded as a test result.
scarce. Furthermore, it has been suggested that cognitive functioning Speed-agility was determined by measuring lower and upper ex­
mediates the association between physical fitness and academic tremities speed-agility. Speed-agility of the lower extremities was
achievement in pre-adolescent children (Kvalø et al., 2019; Oberer et al., measured with the 10 × 5 m Shuttle Run Test. This test consisted of
2018; van der Niet et al., 2014). However, the mediating role of running back and forth between two lines 5 m apart. Time needed to run
cognitive functioning in the relationship between physical fitness and this distance ten times was recorded (s). The best of two attempts was
academic achievement has not been investigated yet in the important used as the test result. Speed-agility of the upper extremities was
developmental stage of adolescence. measured with the Plate Tapping Test. In this test, adolescents placed
The aim of the current study was to examine the association between their non-preferred hand between two disks, that were 80 cm apart, and
three components of health-related and skill-related physical fitness the preferred hand needed to consecutively touch these two discs as fast
(cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness and speed-agility) and both as possible. The time needed to complete 25 full cycles was recorded.
cognitive and academic functioning in adolescents (aged 12–15 years). The best of two attempts was used as a test result.
It was hypothesized that better physical fitness was associated with
better cognitive and academic functioning and that the association be­ 2.2.2. Cognitive functions
tween physical fitness and academic achievement was mediated by Several cognitive functions were assessed in the present study and
cognitive functioning. included assessment of three executive functions (visuospatial working

2. Methods Table 1
Participant characteristics (N = 423).
2.1. Participants Variable Mean (SD) N (%)

Age (years) 13.45 (0.428)


Adolescents from seven secondary schools in the northern part of the Sex, n girls 225 (53.2%)
Netherlands were recruited to participate in the present study. In total, BMI (kg/m2) 19.08 (3.230)
423 adolescents (53.19% girls, Mage = 13.45 years, SD = 0.428) were Healthy weighta 364 (86.1%)
recruited to participate. Adolescents with missing values on one of the Overweighta 36 (8.5%)
Obesitya 11 (2.6%)
outcome variables were excluded. Reasons for missing test scores were
Unknownb 12 (2.8%)
no score for cognitive functions (n = 77) or academic achievement (n = Educational level
70) due to absence during test days at school or incorrect test admin­ Prevocational secondary education 92 (21.75%)
istration, resulting in 346 participant for executive functions and 353 Higher general secondary education 198 (46.8%)
participants for academic achievement. Adolescents attended prevoca­ Pre-university education 133 (31.4%)

tional secondary education, higher general secondary education or pre- Note. BMI, body-mass index; aAccording to the reference values by Cole et al.
university education. In all instances, written informed consent was (2000); babsent during measurements (n = 11) or refused to be weighted (n = 1).

2
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

memory, verbal working memory, and interference control) and of in­ component and characterizes the slow reaction times in the tail of the
formation processing and attentional functioning. distribution. Background information on ex-Gaussian modelling and full
Visuospatial working memory was assessed using the forward and explanation of the mathematical procedure is provided elsewhere
backward condition of the computerized Grid Task (Nutley et al., 2009). (Whelan, 2008).
Adolescents were required to repeat a sequence of yellow dots that was
presented on a four by four grid. First, the adolescents had to repeat a 2.2.3. Academic achievement
sequence in the order of presentation and when they finished this con­ Academic achievement was assessed with a short version of stan­
dition they had to repeat a sequences in reversed order by clicking on the dardized achievement tests of mathematics and language that are part of
relevant locations in the grid (sequence length started at 2 yellow dots). the Dutch Child Academic Monitoring System (CAMS) (van Til et al.,
The length of the sequence, which increased after every four trials, 2015). Excellent psychometric properties have been reported for both
primarily determined trial difficulty. Trial difficulty was also deter­ tests (van Til et al., 2015). The mathematics test consisted of 40 ques­
mined by the trajectory of the yellow dot within the grid, which was tions covering the topics algebra, number sense and geometry. The
more difficult in the second set of two trials in sequences of a given language test consisted of 60 questions about verb and common noun
length. The task was terminated after two consecutive incorrect re­ spelling. Raw scores consisted of the number of correct responses on
sponses on trials with the same difficulty level. For every correct trial, each test. Raw scores were converted to a standardized proficiency score
the participant received one point. The total score was calculated by using normative data derived from a large sample of Dutch adolescents
multiplying the number of correct trials with the span of the last correct from lower and higher educational school levels. This provided the
item. For example, correct responses on the easy sublevel within three opportunity to compare scores between different educational levels.
circles returns a span of 3 and the difficult sublevel within the length of
three circles represents a span of 3.5 (Kessels et al., 2000). 2.3. Procedure
Verbal working memory was assessed using the forward and back­
ward condition of the Digit Span Task (Wechsler, 1991). A sequence of Adolescents were tested during two physical education lessons
numbers was presented auditory by a trained examiner (sequence length within the same week. In the first lesson the 20-m Shuttle Run Test was
started at 2 digits). Adolescents were required to repeat the sequence in administered. Furthermore, participants’ weight, without shoes, was
the order of presentation and when they finished this condition they had measured with a digital scale, that was calibrated after each measure­
to repeat a sequence in reversed order in the backward condition. Trial ment week and all measurements were recorded to the closest 0.1 kg.
difficulty was determined by length of the sequence, which increased Finally, height was measured by tape-measure, without shoes, and all
with one digit every other trial. The task was terminated after two measurements were recorded to the closest cm. In the second lesson, the
consecutive incorrect responses on trials with the same difficulty level. Broad Jump, Sit-Ups, 10 × 5 m Shuttle Run Test and Plate Tapping Test
For every correct trial, the participant received one point. The total score were administered. In the same week, the neurocognitive assessments
was calculated by multiplying the number of correct trials with the were individually performed during the school day. Standardized in­
highest length of digit sequence passed (Kessels et al., 2000). structions were used for administration of the neurocognitive assess­
Interference control was assessed using an adapted version of the ments which took about 25 min. Finally, mathematics and language tests
Attention Network Test (ANT) (Fan et al., 2002). Target stimuli con­ were administered in the class and took about 70 min. All tests were
sisting of an airplane heading to the right or left were presented on a conducted by trained examiners. The study procedures were in accor­
computer screen. Adolescents were instructed to respond as quickly and dance with and approved by the medical ethical committee of the Uni­
accurate as possible to the heading direction of the target stimuli by versity Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. The current data
pressing the corresponding button. Two distractors on both sides could was obtained as part of a larger study registered in the Dutch Trial
flank the target stimuli (i.e. flankers). In the neutral condition no Register (NTR7098) and was conducted according to the principles
flankers were presented. In the congruent condition the flankers were expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
presented on the side to which the airplane headed and in the incon­
gruent condition the flankers were presented on the site opposite to 2.4. Data analysis
which the airplane headed. The participants first performed a practice
block of 24 trials, and were subsequently presented with four blocks of Initial analyses were performed in IBM SPSS Statistics version 26.0.
36 trials each followed with a short break (30s) in between. The dif­ Outliers (z ≤ − 3.29 or z ≥ 3.29) were winsorized (Tabachnick et al.,
ference in mean reaction time and accuracy (% correct responses) be­ 2007). Values missing at random were imputed for a particular variable
tween congruent and incongruent trials was used as a measure for only if the following conditions were met: (1) <20% of the data for that
interference control. variable were missing, (2) there was sufficient data available (<40%
Information processing and attention processes were also assessed data points missing) on other measures of one concept (e.g. physical
with the ANT. Three types of warning cues preceded the target stimuli fitness, cognitive functions, academic achievement) to impute the
(airplane heading left or right): a central cue in the middle of the screen, missing data. Missing values were replaced by multiple imputation using
a spatial cue indicating the position of the upcoming target, or no cue. the average of 5 imputed variables (Sterne et al., 2009). Non-normally
All trials were counterbalanced for cue condition, spatial cue location, distributed variables were converted using Van der Waerden trans­
stimulus condition and stimulus location, and were presented in pre­ formations (van der Waerden, 1952). Age, measures of physical fitness,
defined random order. Mean reaction time on neutral trials was used as a cognitive functions and academic achievement were transformed into
measure of information processing speed. Differences in mean reaction z-scores, with higher scores indicating better performance for physical
time and accuracy between central cues and no cue trials were used as fitness, cognitive functions and academic achievement. Next, an average
measures of alerting attention. Differences in mean reaction time and z-score was calculated for strength of lower extremities and core, rep­
accuracy (% correct responses) between spatial cues and central cues resenting muscular fitness. Likewise, an average z-score was calculated
were used as measures of spatial attention. Finally, as lapses of attention for upper- and lower extremities speed-agility representing overall
cause extreme slow responses that inflate information processing speed, speed-agility.
ex-Gaussian modelling of reaction time distributions was used to To reduce the number of cognitive functions and to enhance their
calculate the contribution of extreme slow responses (tau) (Lacouture & reliability, principal component analysis was performed on all measures
Cousineau, 2008) to information processing speed. Estimates of tau were derived from the cognitive tests. Data were subjected to the principal
obtained from fitting the ex-Gaussian distribution to the reaction times component analysis with varimax rotation. The scree plot was visually
data for each individual, in which tau represents the exponential inspected and components were retained and subjected to further

3
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

analysis. Factor loadings of r > 0.30 were considered relevant. Table 2


The main analysis comprised multivariate multilevel regression Raw test scores on measures of physical fitness (N = 423), cognitive outcomes
analysis (MLwiN, version 3) accounting for the variability between (N = 346) and academic achievement (N = 353).
classes and nesting of adolescents within classes. Cognitive functions Concept measured Measure Mean SD Range
derived from the principal component analysis were used as dependent Cardiorespiratory VO2max (ml.kg-1. 47.68 5.003 35.36–59.50
variables in model 1 (level 1). A random intercept was used for each fitness min-1)
participant (level 2) and class (level 3). Model 1 contained only the Muscular fitness Broad Jump (cm) 157.72 24.231 93.0–251.0
covariates sex and age as predictors of the dependent variables. Model 2 Sit-Ups (number in 19.90 3.817 7–34
30 s)
extended model 1 by adding all aspects of physical fitness. An identical
Speed-agility 10 × 5 m Shuttle 20.68 1.88 15.7–27.0
approach was used to examine the relationship between physical fitness Run Test (s)
and academic achievement, in which proficiency levels of mathematics Plate-Tapping Test 12.10 1.281 9.1–17.2
and language were used as dependent variables. The model fit was (s)
evaluated by comparing the deviance (− 2*log-likelihood) of the first Visuospatial Visuospatial short- 94.40 32.233 18–203
working memory term memory
model and the second model using a χ2 difference test. If model 2 (correct responses
showed improved fit compared to model 1, the unique contribution of x highest span in
each of the entered predictors was determined. Finally, if one or more the forward
physical fitness component(s) were significantly associated with math­ condition)
Visuospatial 79.52 35.741 2–196.5
ematics or language a third model was build. In model 3, a mediation
working memory
analysis was performed to investigate the association between physical (correct responses
fitness and academic achievement after controlling for cognitive func­ x highest span in
tions. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05 (two sided). the backward
condition)
Verbal working Verbal short-term 48.28 20.379 12–113
3. Results memory memory (correct
responses x highest
The raw scores for physical fitness, cognitive functions and academic span in the forward
achievement are presented in Table 2. condition)
Verbal working 19.57 11.824 2–63
The principal component analysis extracted a total of six components
memory (correct
from the cognitive functioning data as shown in Table 3. Based on the responses x highest
strongest contributions, the cognitive functions were labelled as follows: span in the
(1) Information processing and control, (2) Attention accuracy, (3) Vi­ backward
suospatial working memory, (4) Verbal working memory, (5) Attention condition)
Information Information 503.92 62.000 363.04–699.63
efficiency, and (6) Interference control. processing processing (MRT in
Tables 4 and 5 show the results of the multivariate multilevel ms)
regression models testing the associations between the three aspects of Alerting attention Speed of alerting − 23.32 25.735 − 96.74–61.39
physical fitness and the cognitive outcomes and between the three as­ attention (MRT in
ms)
pects of physical fitness and academic achievement, respectively. Re­
Accuracy of − 1.35 4.626 − 17.67–13.11
sults revealed that model 2 of the cognitive outcomes had significantly alerting attention
better model fit than model 1, Δχ2 (3) = 36.03, p < 0.001, indicating (% correct)
that aspects of physical fitness to model 1 (including a random intercept, Spatial attention Speed of spatial − 45.09 27.810 − 131.25–40.11
sex and age), increased the percentage of variance explained in the attention (MRT in
ms)
measures of cognitive functions (see Table 4). Appendix A shows the Accuracy of spatial 3.23 4.058 − 6.25–16.31
multivariate multilevel regression analysis testing the associations be­ attention (%
tween the three aspects of physical fitness and the cognitive functions correct)
separately. Interference Speed of 122.52 39.887 − 1.64–248.26
control interference
Next, we tested the univariate contribution of cardiorespiratory
control (MRT in
fitness, muscular fitness and speed-agility to each of the six cognitive ms)
functions in model 2. These results showed that speed-agility was Accuracy of − 8.96 7.694 − 35.33–4.17
significantly related to visuospatial working memory, t = 2.45, p = interference
0.014, information processing and control, t = 4.25, p=<0.001 and control (% correct)
Lapses of attention Tau 86.70 36.122 2.00–209.00
interference control, t = 2.08, p = 0.039. These findings indicate that Academic Mathematics 34.49 29.324 1–100
better speed-agility is related to better visuospatial working memory, achievement (proficiency score)
information processing and control and interference control. Speed- Language 36.01 29.039 1–99
agility was not significantly related to verbal working memory, atten­ (proficiency score)
tion accuracy or attention efficiency. Furthermore, cardiorespiratory Note. MRT: mean reaction time.
fitness and muscular fitness were not significantly related to any of the
cognitive functions. Finally, it was shown that boys performed better Δχ2 (3) = 5.71, p = 0.127, indicating that adding aspects of physical
compared to girls on information processing and control and that the fitness to the covariates (including a random intercept, sex and age), did
older the adolescents were, the better they scored on information pro­ not significantly increase the percentage of variance explained in the
cessing and control. However, when interaction terms were added to the measures of academic achievement (see Table 5). Because no significant
model - between sex and aspects of physical fitness or between age and associations were found between any of the components of physical
aspects of physical fitness -, no moderating effects of sex or age were fitness and the two measures of academic achievement, no further
found. In all other aspects of cognitive functioning there was no signif­ mediation analyses was conducted to test whether cognitive functions
icant effect of sex or age. would mediate the relationship between the components of physical
The multivariate multilevel regression models testing the association fitness and the measures of academic achievement. However, the results
between the three aspects of physical fitness and academic achievement did show that girls performed better on language compared to boys.
revealed that model 2 had no significantly better model fit than model 1

4
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

Table 3
Principal component analysis.
Neurocognitive Component 1 Information Component 2 Component 3 Component 4 Verbal Component 5 Component 6
measures processing and control Attention accuracy Visuospatial working working memory Attention efficiency Interference control
memory

Visuospatial short- 0.882


term memory
Visuospatial working 0.804
memory
Verbal short-term 0.810
memory
Verbal working 0.804
memory
Information 0.914
processing
Speed of alerting 0.777
attention
Accuracy of alerting 0.897
attention
Speed of spatial ¡0.842
attention
Accuracy of spatial ¡0.880
attention
Speed of interference 0.927
control
Accuracy of 0.561 0.317 − 0.351
interference control
Lapses of attention 0.830
Eigenvalue 1.918 1.747 1.463 1.389 1.342 1.083
Variance explained by 0.160 0.146 0.122 0.116 0.112 0.090
component

Note. Factor loadings >0.300 are displayed; Factor loadings in bold represent the component to which the neurocognitve measure was counted

When adding an interaction term between sex and the aspects of phys­ with the cognitive demands of complex sport situations might foster the
ical fitness, however, no moderating effect of sex was found in the development of inhibitory ability that is not only useful for the sport
model. domain but also in other tasks in daily living (Marchetti et al., 2015).
Taken together, it would be interesting for future studies to examine the
4. Discussion role of specific cognitive functions in complex sport situations in
adolescents.
This study found significant associations between skill-related In the current study no significant associations were found between
physical fitness (e.g. speed-agility) and cognitive functioning (visuo­ health-related physical fitness and any of the cognitive outcomes in
spatial working memory, information processing and control and adolescents. This finding is in contrast with previous literature in which
interference control) in adolescents (12–15years). Furthermore, no sig­ positive associations were found between health-related physical fitness
nificant associations were found between health-related physical fitness and cognitive functions in children and adolescents (Donnelly et al.,
(e.g. cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular fitness) and any cognitive 2016; Hillman et al., 2008; Ruiz-Ariza et al., 2017; Skog et al., 2020; Xue
outcome. Additionally, no association was found between any compo­ et al., 2019). However, in some studies the study sample or methodology
nent of physical fitness and any aspect of academic achievement and was different from our study which could have let to different results.
therefore the mediating role of cognitive functions could not be For example, some studies were performed mostly in pre-adolescent
investigated. children and not in adolescents (Donnelly et al., 2016; Hillman et al.,
The results showed that speed-agility is related with visuospatial 2008; Skog et al., 2020). One possible explanation for these conflicting
working memory, information processing and control and interference findings might be that the relationship between health-related physical
control. Our results are partly in line with a review that showed that fitness and cognitive functioning is less strong in adolescents than in
skill-related physical fitness (speed-agility and motor coordination) was children as a result of a rapid decrease in physical activity and increase
a potential predictor of general cognitive performance (Ruiz-Ariza et al., in sedentary behavior (Corder et al., 2019) affecting health-related
2017). In adolescents skill-related physical fitness, and in particular physical fitness levels in a negative way (Venckunas et al., 2017).
speed-agility, is trained through participation in physical activity or Simultaneously, rapid maturation of the brain takes place, with changes
sports in complex situations that require fast movement reactions to in grey and white matter in the frontal lobe (Tamnes et al., 2017;
changing task demands during tagging or games. The current findings Whitford et al., 2007), a brain area that crucially contributes to execu­
can be explained by the assumption that there are important striatal tive functions (Lebel et al., 2008). The combination of decrease in
pathways between the cerebellum and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, physical fitness and the rapid brain maturation might lead to
brain regions that are critical for complex movements as well as complex sub-optimal development of cognitive functions. Regarding methodol­
cognitive performance (Diamond, 2000; Koziol et al., 2014). During ogy, some studies compared adolescents with a higher fitness level with
complex sport situations, adequate perception of the position of team­ those with a lower fitness level (Ruiz-Ariza et al., 2017). In our study, we
mates and opponents, objects (like a ball) and fast decision making is performed a regression analysis resulting in a more detailed relationship
required, aspects that put heavy demands on visuospatial working between physical fitness and cognitive function. In addition, it allowed
memory (Furley & Wood, 2016). In addition, the association between us to include different aspects of physical fitness in one model, whereas
skill-related physical fitness and information processing and control and most previous studies did not take other aspects of physical fitness into
interference control (inhibition) supports the suggestion that the account (Donnelly et al., 2016; Xue et al., 2019). The current study
cognitive effort required to coordinate complex movements and to cope shows that distinguishing between aspects of health and skill-related

5
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

Table 4 Table 5
Results of multivariate multilevel regression analysis for physical fitness and Results of multivariate multilevel regression analysis for physical fitness and
cognitive functions (n = 346). academic achievement (n = 353).
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2

B SE p B SE p B SE p B SE p

Visuospatial Mathematics
working memory Random intercept 0.049 0.083 0.550 0.089 0.104 0.390
Random intercept − 0.085 0.088 0.333 0.003 0.102 0.979 Sexa − 0.121 0.107 0.258 − 0.191 0.162 0.240
Sexa 0.100 0.089 0.261 − 0.043 0.138 0.754 Age − 0.083 0.056 0.141 − 0.076 0.057 0.183
Age 0.058 0.045 0.196 0.042 0.045 0.356 VO2max − 0.045 0.091 0.625
VO2max − 0.114 0.077 0.139 Muscular fitness − 0.005 0.081 0.953
Muscular fitness − 0.015 0.067 0.820 Speed-agility − 0.017 0.077 0.825
Speed-agility 0.159 0.065 0.014 Variance classesb 0.018 0.024 0.453 0.016 0.023 0.487
Variance classesb 0.069 0.034 0.042 0.061 0.032 0.057 Variance 0.975 0.076 <0.001 0.975 0.076 <0.001
Variance 0.640 0.051 <0.001 0.628 0.050 <0.001 adolescentsb
adolescentsb
Language
Verbal working Intercept − 0.336 0.094 0.000 − 0.256 0.109 0.019
memory Sexa 0.576 0.098 0.000 0.428 0.150 0.004
Random intercept − 0.030 0.097 0.758 − 0.032 0.108 0.766 Age − 0.111 0.053 0.036 − 0.095 0.054 0.079
Sexa 0.009 0.084 0.916 0.028 0.131 0.828 VO2max − 0.066 0.085 0.435
Age − 0.029 0.042 0.490 − 0.040 0.043 0.350 Muscular fitness − 0.134 0.075 0.072
VO2max 0.024 0.073 0.743 Speed-agility 0.069 0.072 0.337
Muscular fitness − 0.064 0.063 0.313 Variance classesb 0.078 0.040 0.051 0.070 0.037 0.059
Speed-agility 0.077 0.062 0.216 Variance 0.814 0.063 <0.001 0.804 0.062 <0.001
Variance classesb 0.115 0.048 0.017 0.101 0.043 0.019 adolescentsb
Variance 0.558 0.045 <0.001 0.557 0.044 <0.001 Deviance 1901.31 1895.60
adolescentsb a b
Note. Boys were used as the reference category; Values representing between
Information processing and control and within class variance, respectively.
Random intercept 0.152 0.083 0.068 0.217 0.090 0.015
Sexa − 0.352 0.079 0.000 − 0.448 0.119 0.000
Age 0.130 0.039 0.001 0.110 0.039 0.004 physical fitness is of importance in research among adolescents.
VO2max − 0.098 0.068 0.149 Furthermore, this study did not find any significant associations
Muscular fitness − 0.008 0.058 0.893 between physical fitness and academic achievement in adolescents. This
Speed-agility 0.238 0.056
is in contrast with previous studies that did find some significant positive
<0.001
Variance classesb 0.073 0.033 0.027 0.054 0.026 0.038
Variance 0.531 0.042 <0.001 0.503 0.040 <0.001 associations between physical fitness and academic performance in six
adolescents b
to eighteen year old students (Chu et al., 2019; Santana et al., 2017). An
Attention efficiency explanation for the conflicting results is that a large number of factors is
Random intercept − 0.022 0.064 0.734 0.026 0.083 0.754 involved in academic performance with some of these variables paying a
Sexa 0.046 0.088 0.599 − 0.040 0.135 0.766 more profound role in adolescence than in childhood, because of the
Age 0.000 0.043 0.995 − 0.007 0.043 0.879 hormonal, behavioral changes that take place in this period (Blakemore
VO2max − 0.093 0.077 0.228
& Choudhury, 2006). For example academic achievement is also asso­
Muscular fitness 0.068 0.067 0.310
Speed-agility 0.070 0.062 0.257 ciated with personality variables (e.g. self-discipline, social skills, aca­
Variance classesb 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 demic perseverance and learning strategies (Duckworth & Seligman,
Variance 0.654 0.050 <0.001 0.647 0.050 <0.001 2005; Wanzer et al., 2019)). All these variables may overshadow the
adolescentsb
relationship between physical fitness and academic achievement in this
Attention accuracy population.
Random intercept 0.078 0.076 0.306 0.124 0.092 0.180 Strengths of this study include the broad range of aspects of physical
Sexa − 0.176 0.094 0.062 − 0.252 0.143 0.079
Age 0.025 0.044 0.574 0.003 0.046 0.948
fitness and cognitive functions that were considered. Furthermore, using
VO2max − 0.073 0.082 0.370 a test for academic achievement that was standardized for different
Muscular fitness 0.046 0.071 0.517 educational levels made it possible to include all adolescents in the same
Speed-agility 0.061 0.065 0.355 analyses. However, this paper has some limitations. First adolescents
Variance classesb 0.021 0.020 0.294 0.015 0.018 0.405
from lowest educational level were underrepresented in this study
Variance 0.803 0.063 <0.001 0.803 0.063 <0.001
adolescentsb sample. We recommend to include more adolescents from the prevo­
cational secondary educational level in future studies. Another limita­
Interference control
Random intercept − 0.080 0.080 0.320 − 0.024 0.101 0.811
tion of this study was the cross-sectional design, which does not allow us
Sexa 0.143 0.108 0.186 0.070 0.165 0.671 to test causal relationships. Finally, there were missing data due to
Age − 0.030 0.052 0.572 − 0.057 0.053 0.284 absence during measurement. However, the missing data was at random
VO2max − 0.097 0.094 0.303 and therefore we don’t expect that this has influenced the results of the
Muscular fitness 0.059 0.081 0.467
study.
Speed-agility 0.156 0.075 0.039
Variance classesb 0.005 0.019 0.792 0.000 0.000 1.000
Variance 0.985 0.078 <0.001 0.971 0.074 <0.001 5. Conclusion
Deviance 4939.31 4903.28

Note. p-values < 0.05 are presented in bold; aBoys were used as the reference The results suggest that in adolescents, skill-related physical fitness is
category; bValues representing between and within class variance, respectively. related to cognitive functions, but health-related physical fitness is not
significantly related to cognitive functions. Perhaps these findings
indicate that the striatal pathways between the cerebellum and dorso­
lateral prefrontal cortex are more prominent in adolescents than the
physiological pathways for the link between physical fitness and
cognition. Our findings are in contrast with previous findings, but draws

6
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

the attention to the possibility of other mechanisms that also play an Furley, P., & Wood, G. (2016). Working memory, attentional control, and expertise in
sports: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Journal of
important role in the physical fitness-cognition link during the adoles­
Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cence. Furthermore, both health-related and skill-related physical jarmac.2016.05.001
fitness were not significantly related to academic achievement. In future Gomez-Pinilla, F., & Hillman, C. (2013). The influence of exercise on cognitive abilities.
studies the focus should be more on skill-related (e.g. cognitive Comprehensive Physiology, 3(1), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c110063
Hillman, C. H., Erickson, K. I., & Kramer, A. F. (2008). Be smart, exercise your heart:
engaging) physical activities combined with aerobic exercises. More­ Exercise effects on brain and cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(1), 58–65.
over, more attention is needed for the skill-related physical fitness as­ https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2298
pects in the association between physical fitness and cognition. Janssen, I., & LeBlanc, A. G. (2010). Systematic review of the health benefits of physical
activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. International Journal of
Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5868-7-40
Kessels, R. P., Van Zandvoort, M. J., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J., & De Haan, E. H. (2000).
The corsi block-tapping task: Standardization and normative data. Applied
This study was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Initiative Neuropsychology, 7(4), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8
for Education Research (405-16-411) and the Dutch Brain Foundation. Koziol, L. F., Budding, D., Andreasen, N., D’Arrigo, S., Bulgheroni, S., Imamizu, H.,
Massao, I., Manto, M., Marvel, C., Parker, K., Pezzulo, G., Ramnani, N., Riva, D.,
The authors would like to thank the teachers, parents, adolescents and
Schmahmann, J., Vandervert, L., & Yamazaki, T. (2014). Consensus paper: The
schools, without whom this work would not have been possible. cerebellum’s role in movement and cognition. The Cerebellum, 13(1), 151–177.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0511-x
Kvalø, S. E., Dyrstad, S. M., Bru, E., & Brønnick, K. (2019). Relationship between aerobic
Appendix A. Supplementary data fitness and academic performance: The mediational role of executive function. The
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 59(8), 1397–1404. https://doi.org/
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. 10.23736/s0022-4707.18.08971-5
Lacouture, Y., & Cousineau, D. (2008). How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and
org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102060.
other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in
Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.20982/
Disclosure of interest tqmp.04.1.p035
Lebel, C., Walker, L., Leemans, A., Phillips, L., & Beaulieu, C. (2008). Microstructural
maturation of the human brain from childhood to adulthood. NeuroImage, 40(3),
The authors report no conflict of interest. 1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.053
Ludyga, S., Gerber, M., Brand, S., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., & Pühse, U. (2016). Acute
effects of moderate aerobic exercise on specific aspects of executive function in
Study registration different age and fitness groups: A meta-analysis. Psychophysiology, 53(11),
1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12736
This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Register (NTR7098). Marchetti, R., Forte, R., Borzacchini, M., Vazou, S., Tomporowski, P. D., & Pesce, C.
(2015). Physical and motor fitness, sport skills and executive function in adolescents:
A moderated prediction model. Psychology, 6(14), 1915–1929. https://doi.org/
References 10.4236/psych.2015.614189
Martínez-Vizcaíno, V., & Sánchez-López, M. (2008). Relationship between physical
activity and physical fitness in children and adolescents. Revista Espanola Cardiologia,
Albon, H. M., Hamlin, M. J., & Ross, J. J. (2010). Secular trends and distributional
61(2), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1157/13116196
changes in health and fitness performance variables of 10-14-year-old children in
Moreau, D., Morrison, A. B., & Conway, A. R. (2015). An ecological approach to cognitive
New Zealand between 1991 and 2003. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(4),
enhancement: Complex motor training. Acta Psychologica, 157, 44–55. https://doi.
263–269. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.047142
org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.007
Barnett, A., Chan, L. Y., & Bruce, L. C. (1993). A preliminary study of the 20-m multistage
van der Niet, A. G., Hartman, E., Smith, J., & Visscher, C. (2014). Modeling relationships
shuttle run as a predictor of peak VO2 in Hong Kong Chinese students. Pediatric
between physical fitness, executive functioning, and academic achievement in
Exercise Science, 5(1), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.5.1.42
primary school children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15(4), 319–325. https://
Best, J. R. (2010). Effects of physical activity on children’s executive function:
doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.02.010
Contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise. Developmental Review, 30
Nutley, S. B., Söderqvist, S., Bryde, S., Humphreys, K., & Klingberg, T. (2009). Measuring
(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001
working memory capacity with greater precision in the lower capacity ranges.
Blakemore, S., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain:
Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/
Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology
87565640903325741
and Psychiatry, 47(3-4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-
Oberer, N., Gashaj, V., & Roebers, C. M. (2018). Executive functions, visual-motor
7610.2006.01611.x
coordination, physical fitness and academic achievement: Longitudinal relations in
Chu, C., Chen, F., Pontifex, M. B., Sun, Y., & Chang, Y. (2019). Health-related physical
typically developing children. Human Movement Science, 58, 69–79. https://doi.org/
fitness, academic achievement, and neuroelectric measures in children and
10.1016/j.humov.2018.01.003
adolescents. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(2), 117–132.
Ortega, F. B., Ruiz, J. R., Castillo, M. J., & Sjöström, M. (2008). Physical fitness in
https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2016.1223420
childhood and adolescence: A powerful marker of health. International Journal of
Cole, T. J., Bellizzi, M. C., Flegal, K. M., & Dietz, W. H. (2000). Establishing a standard
Obesity, 32(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803774
definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ,
Pesce, C., Crova, C., Marchetti, R., Struzzolino, I., Masci, I., Vannozzi, G., & Forte, R.
320(7244), 1240. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240
(2013). Searching for cognitively optimal challenge point in physical activity for
Corbin, C. B., Lindsey, R., & Welk, G. (2000). Concepts of physical fitness: Active lifestyles
children with typical and atypical motor development. Mental Health and Physical
for wellness. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Activity, 6(3), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.07.001
Corder, K., Winpenny, E., Love, R., Brown, H. E., White, M., & Van Sluijs, E. (2019).
Ruiz-Ariza, A., Grao-Cruces, A., de Loureiro, N. E. M., & Martinez-Lopez, E. J. (2017).
Change in physical activity from adolescence to early adulthood: A systematic
Influence of physical fitness on cognitive and academic performance in adolescents:
review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. British Journal of Sports
A systematic review from 2005–2015. International Review of Sport and Exercise
Medicine, 53(8), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-097330
Psychology, 10(1), 108–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1184699
COUNCIL, O. E. (1988). Handbook of the eurofit tests of physical fitness. Roma: Italian
Santana, C., Azevedo, L. B., Cattuzzo, M. T., Hill, J. O., Andrade, L. P., & Prado, W. L.
National.
(2017). Physical fitness and academic performance in youth: A systematic review.
Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27(6), 579–603. https://doi.org/
development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Development, 71(1),
10.1111/sms.12773
44–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00117
Schmidt, M., Jäger, K., Egger, F., Roebers, C. M., & Conzelmann, A. (2015). Cognitively
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168.
engaging chronic physical activity, but not aerobic exercise, affects executive
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
functions in primary school children: A group-randomized controlled trial. Journal of
Donnelly, J. E., Hillman, C. H., Castelli, D., Etnier, J. L., Lee, S., Tomporowski, P.,
Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37(6), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-
Lambourne, K., & Szabo-Reed, A. N. (2016). Physical activity, fitness, cognitive
0069
function, and academic achievement in children: A systematic review. Medicine &
Skog, H., Lintu, N., Haapala, H. L., & Haapala, E. A. (2020). Associations of
Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(6), 1197–1222. https://doi.org/10.1249/
cardiorespiratory fitness, adiposity, and arterial stiffness with cognition in youth.
MSS.0000000000000901
Physiological Reports, 8(18), Article e14586. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14586
Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting
Sterne, J. A., White, I. R., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., Kenward, M. G.,
academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939–944.
Wood, A. M., & Carpenter, J. R. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ, 338. https://doi.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the
org/10.1136/bmj.b2393
efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 14(3), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902317361886

7
B.F. Haverkamp et al. Psychology of Sport & Exercise 57 (2021) 102060

Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics, 5 pp. van der Waerden, B. L. (1952). Order tests for the two-sample problem and their power.
481–498). Boston, MA: Pearson. Indagationes Mathematicae, 14, 453–458.
Tamnes, C. K., Herting, M. M., Goddings, A., Meuwese, R., Blakemore, S., Dahl, R. E., Wanzer, D., Postlewaite, E., & Zargarpour, N. (2019). Relationships among noncognitive
Güroğlu, B., Raznahan, A., Sowell, E. R., Crone, E. A., & Mills, K. L. (2017). factors and academic performance: Testing the university of chicago consortium on
Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence: A multisample study of school research model. AERA Open, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/
interrelated longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area and thickness. 2332858419897275
Journal of Neuroscience, 37(12), 3402–3412. https://doi.org/10.1523/ Wechsler, D. (1991). WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scale for children. Manual
JNEUROSCI.3302-16.2017 Psychological Corporation.
van Til, A., & van Boxtel, H. (2015). Wetenschappelijke verantwoording toets 0 t/m 3, Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. Psychological Record, 58(3),
tweede generatie. Arnhem: Cito. https://www.cito.nl/-/media/Files/kennisbank/ci 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395630
to-bv/96_wetenschappelijke-verantwoording-volgsyteemvo-gen2.pdf?la=nl-NL. Whitford, T. J., Rennie, C. J., Grieve, S. M., Clark, C. R., Gordon, E., & Williams, L. M.
Venckunas, T., Emeljanovas, A., Mieziene, B., & Volbekiene, V. (2017). Secular trends in (2007). Brain maturation in adolescence: Concurrent changes in neuroanatomy and
physical fitness and body size in Lithuanian children and adolescents between 1992 neurophysiology. Human Brain Mapping, 28(3), 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/
and 2012. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 71(2), 181–187. https://doi. hbm.20273
org/10.1136/jech-2016-207307 Xue, Y., Yang, Y., & Huang, T. (2019). Effects of chronic exercise interventions on
Vrijkotte, S., Vries, S., & Jongert, T. (2007). Fitheidstesten voor de jeugd TNO Kwaliteit van executive function among children and adolescents: A systematic review with meta-
Leven. analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 53(22), 1397–1404. https://doi.org/
10.1136/bjsports-2018-099825

You might also like