Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 43

medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021.

The copyright holder for this


preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

1 Matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 enzymatic activities are selectively increased in

2 the myocardium of Chronic Chagas Disease cardiomyopathy patients: role of

3 TIMPs

5 Running title: Metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in Chagas disease

7 Monique Andrade Baron1,2,3,¶, Ludmila Rodrigues Pinto Ferreira1,2,3,4, ¶, Priscila Camillo

8 Teixeira1,2,3,¶,#a, Ana Iochabel Soares Moretti5, Ronaldo Honorato Barros Santos6,

9 Amanda Farage Frade1,2,3,#b, Andréia Kuramoto1,3, Victor Debbas4, Luiz Alberto

10 Benvenuti6, Fabio Antônio Gaiotto5, Fernando Bacal5, Pablo Pomerantzeff5, Christophe

11 Chevillard7,*, Jorge Kalil2,3, Edecio Cunha-Neto1,2,3,*.

12

1
13 Laboratory of Immunology, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, School of

14 Medicine, 05403-900, São Paulo, Brazil.


2
15 Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, University of São Paulo, School of

16 Medicine, 01246100, São Paulo, Brazil.


3
17 Institute for Investigation in Immunology (iii), INCT, 05403-001, São Paulo, Brazil.
4
18 Universidade Santo Amaro (UNISA), São Paulo, Brazil.
5
19 Vascular Biology Laboratory, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, School

20 of Medicine, 05403-900, São Paulo, Brazil.


6
21 Division of Transplantation, Heart Institute (InCor), University of São Paulo, School of

22 Medicine, 05403-900, São Paulo, Brazil


7
23 INSERM, UMR_1090, Aix Marseille Université, TAGC Theories and Approaches of

24 Genomic Complexity, Institut MarMaRa, Marseille, France

25
NOTE: This preprint reports new research that has not been certified by peer review and should not be used to guide clinical practice.

1
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

26

27 ¶ These authors contributed equally to this work

28 Present addresses:
#a
29 Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124

30 Building 93 / Room 6.20 CH 4070 Basel, Switzerland.


#b
31 Bioengineering Program, Instituto Tecnológico, Universidade Brasil, rua Carolina da

32 Fonseca, 235, Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

33

*
34 Addresses for correspondence:

35 Edecio Cunha-Neto, Laboratory of Immunology, Heart Institute (Incor), Avenida Dr.

36 Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44 – Bloco II, 9o. Andar. São Paulo, Brazil. 05403-900. E-

37 mail: edecunha@gmail.com

38 Dr. Christophe Chevillard, Theories and Approaches of Genomic Complexity (TAGC),

39 INSERM/AMU UMR_1090, Parc Scientifique de Luminy, case 928, 163, avenue de

40 Luminy, 13288 Marseille France Phone: 33491828736, E-mail:

41 christophe.chevillard@univ-amu.fr

42

43 Conflict of interest statement :

44 Authors have no financial and personal relationships that might bias their work. The

45 authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

46

47

48 Word count for the main text: 3500 words

49

2
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

50 Abstract (150 words)

51 Chronic Chagas disease (CCC) is an inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy with a worse

52 prognosis compared to other cardiomyopathies. We show the expression and activity of

53 Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMP) and of their inhibitors TIMP (tissue inhibitor of

54 metalloproteinases) in myocardial samples of end stage CCC, idiopathic dilated

55 cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients, and from organ donors. Our results showed

56 significantly increased mRNA expression of several MMPs, several TIMPs and

57 EMMPRIN in CCC and DCM samples. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 protein levels were

58 significantly elevated in both sample groups, while MMP-9 protein level was exclusively

59 increased in CCC. MMPs 2 and 9 activities were also exclusively increased in CCC.

60 Results suggest that the balance between proteins that inhibit the MMP-2 and 9 is shifted

61 toward their activation. Inflammation-induced increases in MMP-2 and 9 activity and

62 expression associated with imbalanced TIMP regulation could be related to a more

63 extensive heart remodeling and poorer prognosis in CCC patients.

64 Keywords: Chagas disease, metalloproteinases, heart failure; cardiac remodeling, MMPs

3
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

65 Introduction

66 Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) is the most important chronic clinical

67 manifestation of Chagas disease, a zoonosis caused by the protozoan parasite,

68 Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) naturally transmitted through haematophagous reduviid

69 bugs, but also by blood transfusions, organ transplants or congenitally [1]. The World

70 Health Organization estimates that approximately 7-8 million people are infected with T.

71 cruzi in Central and South America [2], with an estimated 300.000 cases in the United

72 States and 120.000 cases in Europe alone due to migration of people from endemic areas.

73 The acute phase of Chagas disease usually lasts 6-8 weeks, and most frequently is oligo-

74 or asymptomatic [3]. About 30% of the asymptomatic patients will develop CCC, a

75 progressive, fibrotic disease in which myocardial inflammation plays a fundamental role

76 causing tissue damage and also dysregulation of heart extracellular matrix (ECM) leading

77 to a maladaptive cardiac remodeling that constitutes the basic step to a progressive heart

78 failure [4-8].

79 The term cardiac remodeling describes a response mechanism in response to injury and

80 differs from the physiological cardiac hypertrophy observed during gestation and

81 intensive exercising [9, 10]. Different cardiovascular disorders, like myocardial

82 infarction, ischemia, reperfusion injury and viral myocarditis displays an intense cardiac

83 remodeling that involves cardiac fibroblasts, the main cell type responsible for ECM

84 regulation and homeostasis [6, 11]. Cardiac fibroblasts perform important functions by

85 synthetizing ECM molecules as well as regulating the ECM turnover by secreting matrix

86 metalloproteinases (MMPs) [6, 12]. MMPs are zinc-dependent endopeptidases

87 responsible for degradation and remodeling of ECM components including collagens,

88 proteoglycans, fibronectin and laminin within the injury zone [12]. Because MMPs have

89 a dual role functioning in both physiological and pathological processes, their functions

4
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

90 should be tightly regulated. MMPs are synthesized and secreted, in most cases, as inactive

91 proenzymes (pro-MMPs) that are activated by other proteinases [13, 14]. MMPs also

92 regulate the activities of effector proteins involved in inflammation and fibrosis [15]. The

93 homeostasis in a normal healthy heart is dependent on the balance between activation of

94 pro-MMPs to active degradative MMPs, a process controlled by complex formation with

95 their endogenous inhibitors: tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) [13, 16]. MMPs

96 expression and activity were shown to be dysregulated in different cardiovascular

97 diseases and in failing hearts of various etiologies like acute myocardial infarction, DCM

98 and heart failure [17]. Two important members of MMPs, MMP-2 and MMP-9, are from

99 the group of gelatinases and have been indicated as key enzymes responsible for profound

100 cardiac remodeling [18, 19]. Right after an acute injury, like a myocardial infarction, the

101 pre-existing pro-MMP-2 and 9 within the myocardium are activated and disrupt the

102 fibrillar collagen network to allow inflammatory cells to infiltrate into the infarct zone to

103 remove the necrotic cells [20]. Myocytes, fibroblasts and activated macrophages as well

104 as neutrophils are thought to be the main cellular sources for the increased MMP-2 and

105 MMP-9 levels [21]. Previous studies have shown higher serum and plasma levels of

106 MMP-2 and MMP-9 in CCC [22, 23]. Other MMPs, such as MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-13

107 and MMP-12 also have as substrate collagen type I and III, main components of heart

108 extracellular matrix [24, 25]; Extracellular matrix metalloproteinase Inducer EMMPRIN,

109 an inducer of MMP2 and MMP9 [26, 27]. Here, we show for the first time, gene and

110 protein expression, as well as enzymatic activity of MMP-2, MMP-9 and gene and protein

111 expression of their specific inhibitors TIMP 1, 2, 3 and 4 and EMMPRIN in myocardial

112 tissue samples from CCC patients compared to DCM and from heart transplant donors

113 (control samples). Our results suggest an important role of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in

114 myocardial remodeling and in cardiac dysfunction observed in patients with CCC.

5
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

115 Materials and Methods

116 Ethics Statement

117 The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Medicine,

118 University of São Paulo (Protocol number 492/682) and written informed consent was

119 obtained from the patients. In the case of samples from heart donors, written informed

120 consent was obtained from their families.

121

122 Samples of human myocardium

123 Myocardial samples were obtained from left ventricular-free wall heart tissue from end-

124 stage heart failure patients at the moment of heart transplantation. The patients belonged

125 to three diagnostic groups: CCC (at least 2 positive results in 3 independent anti-T. cruzi

126 serology tests – ELISA immunoassay, indirect immunofluorescence assay and indirect

127 hemagglutination test), DCM (idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy) and controls, left

128 ventricular free wall samples obtained from healthy hearts of organ donors, which were

129 not used for transplantation due to size mismatch with available recipients (Table 1). All

130 Chagas disease patients underwent standard electrocardiography and echocardiography.

131 Echocardiography was performed in the hospital setting using an Acuson Sequoia model

132 512 echocardiographer (Siemens, Germany) with a broad-band transducer. The left

133 ventricular dimensions and regional and global function evaluations were performed

134 using a 2 dimensions and M mode approach, in accordance with the recommendations of

135 the American Society of Echocardiography. Patients with CCC presented with abnormal

136 electrocardiography findings that ranged from typical conduction abnormalities (right

137 bundle branch block and/or left anterior division hemiblock) to severe arrhythmia [28,

138 29]. A group of patients also presented varying degrees of ventricular dysfunction

139 classified on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction with all other causes of

6
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

140 ventricular dysfunction/heart failure excluded. Characteristics of patients and normal

141 donors whose samples were used in this study are described in Table 1 and Supplemental

142 Table 2.

143

144 Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study subjects.

145
CLINICAL PARAMETERS GROUPS

CCC DCM CONTROL

Age 47.8 ±14,2 40,6±17,1 28,3 ± 11,0

Male, n (%) 6 (35%) 9 (75%) 6 (100%)

Sample size, n 17 12 6

Body Surface (m2) 1.6 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.1 N.D.

Ejection Fraction- EF (%) 23.59 ± 8.5 21.6 ± 7.9 N.D.

Fractional shortening (%) 11.94 ± 7.3 12.2 ± 3.7 N.D.

Left ventricular end diastolic


62.12 ± 98 70.6 ± 19.8 N.D.
diameter LVEDD (mm)

Left ventricular end systolic


48.82 ± 15.6 62.7 ± 20.1 N.D.
diameter LVESD (mm)

Ventricular Septum (mm) 8.53 ± 1.7 8.3 ± 1.4 N.D.

Posterior wall of left ventricle


8.5 ± 1.8 8.6 ± 1.4 N.D.
(mm)

Left atrial diameter (mm) 49.18 ± 5.5 52.1 ± 7.4 N.D.

Aortic sinus (mm) 29.53 ± 3.1 31.8 ± 5.3 N.D.

Myocardial mass index (g/m2) 187.88 ± 69.3 233.8 ± 76.6 N.D.

Relative wall thickness (mm) 0.68 ± 0.5 0.60 ± 0.1 N.D.

7
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

Diastolic volume (ml) 288.41 ± 136.6 349.9 ± 131.8 N.D.

Systolic volume (ml) 194.06 ± 131.8 267.5 ± 127.4 N.D.

146 N.D.: not done.

147 Control: Heart donors; DCM: Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; CCC: Chronic Chagas

148 cardiomyopathy.

149 Datas were expressed as mean ± SD.

150 Reference values: EF: Ejection Fraction (>55%); Ejection Fraction - EF (25-43%); Left

151 ventricular end diastolic diameter - LVESD (mm): (42-59mm); Left ventricular end

152 systolic diameter – LVESD (mm): (25-39mm); Ventricular Septum (mm): (6-10mm);

153 Posterior wall of the left ventricule (mm): (6-10mm); Left atrial diameter (mm): (30-

154 40mm); Aortic sinus (mm): (31-47mm); Myocardial mass index (g/m2): (49-115 g/m2);

155 Relative wall thickness (mm): (<0.42).

156

157 Samples preparation

158 All samples were cleared from pericardium and fat and 100mg pieces of left ventricle

159 heart wall were quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C and another set was

160 fixed in a solution of 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned

161 at thickness of individual 5 µm sections. The slides were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin

162 (H&E) for evaluation of the intensity and location of the inflammatory infiltrate and

163 PicroSirius Red (Abcam, UK) staining to visualize the degree of fibrosis. Stained sections

164 were acquired with a 20x objective lens by Leica DM2500 microscope (Leica Cambridge,

165 Ltd, UK) and true color digital images were captured. Slides were scored for the intensity

166 of myocarditis and for the presence or absence of hypertrophy (Supplemental Table 2).

167

168 Morphometric analysis for myocardial collagen area

8
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

169 A total of 15 images were captured per myocardium tissue sample under 10X

170 magnification; we studied 5 samples of each patient group (CCC, DCM, and control). For

171 quantitative evaluation of fibrosis, collagen area was calculated using Leica Qwin Plus

172 3.5 image analysis software, as percentage of fibrosis area per total area of heart tissue

173 sections.

174

175 Isolation of total RNA

176 Total RNA was isolated from 100mg of tissue from each heart sample (CCC N=17, DCM

177 N=12, Control N=6) by mechanical disruption with the Precellys 24-bead-based

178 homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, France) using 3 cycles of 15 seconds with pause of

179 20 seconds each at 6.000 rpm. Samples were homogenized in 1ml of Trizol reagent (Life

180 Technologies, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. All sample had an OD

181 260/280 ration ≥1.9. The RNA integrity was analyzed on a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent,

182 USA). Only samples with RIN (RNA Integrity Number) value > 6.5 were used in our

183 analysis.

184

185 Analysis of mRNA expression by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction

186 (Real Time – qPCR)

187 RNA from each sample was treated with Rnase-free DNAse I (United States Biological,

188 Ohio, USA) cDNA was obtained from 5 µg total RNA using Super-script II reverse

189 transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA) and mRNA expression was analyzed by real-time qPCR

190 with SYBR Green I PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) with 250nM of sense

191 and anti-sense specific primers using the ABI Prism 7500 Real Time PCR System. The

192 following primers were designed using Primer Express software version 3.0 (Applied

193 Biosystems, USA; Supplemental table 1). All the samples were processed in triplicate

9
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

194 for the target and for the endogenous reference gene, RPLP0. A set of “no RT” and "non

195 template controls" controls were included in each experiment. Ct values were averaged

196 for the replicates and expression was calculated as the mean ± interquartile ranges per

197 group for each individual data point using the relative expression equation (fold change

198 over control samples) by the 2-DDCT method.

199

200 Protein extraction from heart tissue samples

201 Protein was isolated from each heart sample with RIPA buffer containing 150 mM sodium

202 chloride, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 mMl/Tris-HCL pH

203 7.5, and proteolytic enzyme inhibitors (1mM phenymethylsulfonylfluoride, PMSF and

204 1% aprotinin) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) by mechanical disruption with the Precellys 24-

205 bead-based homogenizer using 3 cycles of 15 seconds with pause of 20 seconds each at

206 6,000 rpm at 4˚C. The homogenate was sonicated for 3 cycles of 10 seconds each of 10

207 Watts (60 Dismembrator Sonic, Fischer Scientific, USA), centrifuged at 12.000g for 30

208 minutes at 4˚C. Supernatants were collected and protein quantification was performed

209 using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

210

211 Protein expression analysis by Western blotting

212 About 70µg of isolated protein from each myocardial sample (5 samples per group: CCC,

213 DCM and Control) were heated for 5 minutes at 95˚C, and subjected to one dimensional

214 electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) using 12.5% polyacrylamide using the vertical

215 electrophoresis System Ruby SE600 (GE Healthcare, USA). After electrophoresis,

216 proteins were transferred from gel to a nitrocellulose membrane using the TE Semi-Dry

217 Transfer Unit (GE Healthcare, USA). The nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad,

218 Laboratories, USA) were blocked for nonspecific binding with 5% non-fat dry milk in

10
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

219 Tris-buffered saline and 0.1% Tween 20% (TBST) for 2h at room temperature. Blots were

220 washed in TBST twice over 30 minutes and the ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection

221 Reagents, were used for detection. Images were capture using the ImageQuant LAS 4000

222 equipment (GE Healthcare, USA) and membranes were imaged using a LI-Cor Odyssey

223 scanner (LI-COR Biotechnology - UK Ltd). Analysis of densitometry was performed

224 using the program ImageQuant TL, and the data was normalized to beta-actin.

225

226 Zymography assay analysis of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity

227 Activities of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in myocardium tissue sample from CCC, DCM and

228 Control (5 samples/each group) were examined by gelatin zymography. About 70µg

229 protein isolated from each heart tissue sample were applied to 1D electrophoresis using

230 10% polyacrylamide gel copolymerized with 1% gelatin type A from porcine skin

231 (Sigma, USA) as a substrate for gelatinolytic proteases. After electrophoresis, the gels

232 were washed twice in 2.5% Triton X-100 (Amersham Biosciences, UK) in water for 30

233 minutes. The gels were then incubated overnight at 37˚C in reaction buffer (5mM CaCl2,

234 2mM NaN3 and 50mM Tris-HCL buffer pH 7.4). After incubation, the gels were stained

235 for 3h in 45% methanol,10% glacial acetic acid containing 1% Coomassie Blue R-250

236 (Amersham Biosciences/GE Healthcare, USA) and were subsequently partially destained

237 with the same solution without dye. The gelatinolytic activity of each MMP was

238 qualitatively evaluated as a clear band of digested gelatin against a blue background. To

239 confirm that the visualized bands of lysis were due to MMP activity, selected duplicate

240 gels was incubated with MMP inhibitors (5mM EDTA or 10mM 1,10-phenanthroline).

241 Proteolytic signals of active MMP-2 and MMP-9 were quantified based on the peak area,

242 using the software ImageQuant TL [30].

243

11
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

244 Statistical analysis

245 Difference between groups was determined by one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

246 followed by a non-parametrical test (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test). All statistical

247 analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Prism Software,

248 Inc., USA). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. P-values were considered significant

249 if  0.05 (marked with a * symbol).

250

251

12
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

252 Results

253 Cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and collagen deposit in heart of CCC and DCM

254 patients.

255 The histopathological analysis revealed that both groups CCC and DCM present

256 cardiomyocyte hypertrophy with nuclear enlargement (Figure 1A). As expected,

257 myocarditis associated with a predominant lymphocytic infiltration was observed only in

258 heart samples of CCC patients, evidenced by H&E staining (Supplemental Table 2,

259 Figure 1A). To evaluate ECM fibrosis distribution, heart tissue sections were stained

260 with Picro Sirius Red to detect collagen deposition. Both CCC and DCM displayed a

261 significantly higher percentage of fibrosis area as compared to Controls (Figure 1B).

262 Collagen area was also significantly higher in the heart tissue sections from CCC

263 compared to DCM group. There were no significant differences in the analyzed clinical

264 parameters such as ejection fraction (E.F), left ventricle diastolic diameter (LVDD) and

265 left ventricle systolic diameter (LVSD) between DCM and CCC groups (Table 1).

266

267 MMPs are significantly altered in heart from CCC and DCM patients

268 We evaluated gene and protein expression of different classes of MMPs (MMP-2, MMP-

269 3, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-12, MMP-13) and EMMPRIN in heart samples from DCM,

270 CCC and CONT patients. We observed a significant upregulation in gene expression of

271 MMP-2, MMP-9 (Figure 2A), MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN in both DCM and

272 CCC heart samples compared to Control (Supplemental figure 1). MMP-3 and MMP-8

273 mRNA expression were undetectable in all samples tested. Western blotting analysis

274 showed that MMP-2 protein is increased in both DCM and CCC heart samples and MMP-

275 9 protein is exclusively increased in CCC compared to Control group (Figure 2B). There

13
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

276 were no significant differences in protein expression of MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-12,

277 MMP-13 and EMMPRIN between CCC, DCM and control samples (Figure 6D).

278 Gelatin zymography was carried out on DCM, CCC and control patient heart samples (5

279 samples per group) to assess MMP-2 and MMP-9 enzymatic activity. Figure 2C shows

280 the detection of gelatinolytic bands for MMP-2 (62kDa) and MMP-9 (88kDa) on SDS-

281 PAGE gel. Densitometry analysis (Figure 2D) shows that both enzymes MMP-2 and

282 MMP-9 are significantly more active in CCC heart tissue samples as compared to both

283 control and/or DCM samples. MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities in the DCM group were not

284 significantly different from control tissue.

285

286 Gene and Protein expression of Tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) in heart from

287 CCC and DCM patients

288 We assessed gene and protein expression of TIMPs 1, 2, 3 and 4 in heart tissue from CCC,

289 DCM and control samples. A significant upregulation in gene expression was found for

290 all TIMPs analyzed in CCC and DCM heart tissue samples (Figure 3A) compared to the

291 control group (P 0.05). TIMP-2 was the only inhibitor with significantly increased

292 protein levels, both in DCM and CCC heart tissue samples as compared to Control

293 samples (Figure 3B).

294

295 Balance between MMP-2 and MMP-9 and their tissue inhibitors (TIMPs) is shifted

296 towards activation in CCC and DCM heart tissue

297 We observed that the MMP-2/TIMP-1, MMP-2/TIMP-2, MMP-2/TIMP-3 and MMP-

298 2/TIMP-4 ratios were increased in CCC heart tissue compared to DCM or control group

299 samples (P 0.05) (Figures 4A to 4D). As shown in Figures 5A to 5C, MMP-9/TIMP-1

300 and MMP-9/TIMP-3 ratios were also increased in CCC heart tissue in comparison to

14
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

301 DCM or control group (P 0.05); MMP9/TIMP2 and MMP-9/TIMP-4 ratio did not show

302 any significant changes between the analyzed groups (Figure 5D).

303

304 Expression of MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN

305 We evaluated gene and protein expression of the other classes of MMPs and EMMPRIN

306 in myocardial samples from the CCC, DCM and control. Figures 6A to 6C shows that

307 gene expression levels of MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN were significantly higher

308 in CCC and DCM myocardial tissue in comparison to samples from control group (P

309 0.05). The gene expression of MMP-3 and MMP-8 were undetectable in all samples

310 tested. There were no significant differences in protein expression of MMP-3, MMP-8,

311 MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN between CCC, DCM and control samples (Figure

312 6D).

15
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

313 Discussion

314 Here, we report for the first time that the myocardium from CCC and DCM patients have

315 alterations in MMP-2, MMP-9 and their TIMPs. We found that collagen area, MMP-2

316 and TIMP-2 protein levels and mRNA expression of the MMPs -2, -9, -12, -13, the TIMPs

317 -1, -2, -3, -4 and MMP inducer EMMPRIN were increased in both CCC and DCM

318 samples as compared to controls. Importantly, MMP-9 protein levels and MMP-2 and

319 MMP-9 enzymatic activity were increased only in CCC. Moreover, MMP Enzymatic

320 activity/TIMP protein ratios MMP-2/TIMP-1, MMP-2/TIMP-3, MMP-9/TIMP-1 and

321 MMP-9/TIMP-3 were increased in CCC as compared with DCM and control, and MMP-

322 2/TIMP-2 and MMP-2/TIMP-4 ratios were higher among CCC than DCM.

323 Our findings on MMP-2 and MMP-9 corroborate the important involvement of MMPs in

324 physiological and pathological myocardial remodeling [31-33]. Gutierrez et al. described

325 an increase in MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in hearts of mice acutely infected with T.

326 cruzi, and TIMP treatment reduced myocarditis and increased survival [34]. Polyakova

327 et al. demonstrated that increased expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 is associated with

328 collagen maturation in heart failure, showing an important role of these enzymes in

329 fibrosis through collagen configuration, activation and deposition with cardiomyocyte

330 hypertrophy and fibrosis contributing with remodeling and cardiac dysfunction [24].

331 Myocardial TNF-α was correlated with MMP-9 activity in a mouse model of myocardial

332 infarction [35]. These authors demonstrated that TNF-α blockade decreased left

333 ventricular dilation, which was associated with a decrease in the production and activity

334 of MMP-9. Activation of TNF-α receptors can induce the synthesis of MMP-9 by

335 activating the transcription factors, AP-1 (activator protein-1) and NF-kB (Nuclear factor

336 kappa B), both capable of binding to MMP-9 promoter regions [36, 37]. Inflammatory

337 cells present in the CCC myocardium produce high levels of TNF-α and other pro-

16
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

338 inflammatory cytokines, like IFN-γ and IL-6 [38]. Human macrophages infected with T.

339 cruzi produced increased levels of MMP-9, which was related to the production of

340 cytokines such as IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-6 [39]. Medeiros et al. reported that neutrophils

341 and monocytes from indeterminate and cardiac Chagas disease patients had higher

342 intracellular levels of MMP-2 and MMP-9 than those found in non-infected individuals

343 [40]. Together with our data showing increased protein levels of MMP-9 in CCC

344 myocardium, this suggests that MMP-9 – possibly coming from inflammatory cells-

345 might be the main MMP with activity induced by locally produced inflammatory

346 cytokines. Our results that MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities are predominantly increased in

347 CCC myocardium are consistent with the hypothesis that local inflammation induces

348 metalloproteinase activity, exacerbating extracellular matrix remodeling with progressive

349 fibrosis.

350 An imbalance in the proportions of MMPs and their endogenous TIMP inhibitors may

351 lead to excessive degradation of ECM and disease [41]. The finding of increased ratios

352 of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity/TIMP protein levels suggest an overall dominance of

353 MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity over TIMPs inhibition in myocardium samples from CCC

354 but not DCM patients. The finding that only TIMP 1 and 3 showed significantly increased

355 MMP/TIMP ratios in CCC vs both DCM and control might suggest TIMP-1 and TIMP-

356 3 imbalance was key to the increased activity of both MMP-2 and -9 in CCC myocardium.

357 Although all TIMPs have affinity for MMP-9, TIMP-1 was described to be the major

358 endogenous inhibitor of MMP-9 [42]. Conversely, our data showing that TIMP-2 and

359 TIMP-4 ratios were increased in CCC vs DCM in MMP-2 but not MMP-9 are consistent

360 with TIMP-2 and TIMP-4 having an effect on MMP-2, but not on MMP-9. TIMP-2 is the

361 most universal MMP inhibitor [24, 31], binding with high affinity to both the active and

362 pro-form of MMP-2 [31]. Transcriptional regulation of MMP and TIMPs is partially

17
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

363 overlapping; MMP-2 and TIMP-2 share the same transcription factor, AP-2 (activator

364 protein) [31], which might explain the increased mRNA and protein expression of TIMP-

365 2 and MMP-2 in myocardium samples from CCC and DCM patients.

366 Previous studies showed that patients with Chagas disease have higher circulating MMP-

367 2 and MMP-9 protein and activity compared to patients with asymptomatic form of the

368 disease [23, 43]. Sherbuck et al. showed that in patients with severe chagasic

369 cardiomyopathy MMP-2 could be a predictive marker of mortality [44]. Fares et al.

370 showed that CCC patients have a higher plasma levels and activity of MMP-2 and MMP-

371 9 compared to patients with asymptomatic form of the disease, and they hypothesized that

372 the increased activity of MMP-9 favors the development of the cardiac form of Chagas

373 disease. Authors also noted that MMP-9 expression was positively correlated with the

374 production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, like TNF-α and IL-1β [23]. It is likely that the

375 increased tissue activities of MMP-2 and -9 are the proximal cause of the increased

376 circulating levels of the same MMPs. Regarding the other MMP studied, the finding of

377 increased mRNA of collagen I -degrading MMP-12, MMP-13 and MMP inducer

378 EMMPRIN in CCC and DCM myocardial tissue in the absence of a corresponding

379 increase in protein expression may be simply a response to similar transcriptional signals.

380 Our study had limitations. The sample size was reduced and the ages and sex were not

381 matched between the control and patient samples. This is linked to the fact that organ

382 donors are almost always younger than the recipient cohort. However, in one of our

383 previous studies [45], we had shown that these two covariates had a limited impact on the

384 whole transcriptomic pattern.

385 Taken together, results suggest that myocardial remodeling and MMP-2 and MMP-9

386 activity are increased in CCC as compared with DCM, possibly by means of differential

387 TIMP regulation of MMP activity. These findings may suggest a possible mechanism for

18
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

388 the increased fibrosis, myocardial remodeling and cardiac dysfunction observed in

389 patients with CCC as compared to other forms of cardiomyopathy. Pharmacological

390 modulation of endogenous agents linked to fibrosis in CCC, like Galectin-3 [46] and

391 microRNA-21 [47], or treatment with spironolactone [48], colchicine [49] or bone

392 marrow cells [50] promoted a significant reduction in cardiac fibrosis in rodent models

393 of Chagas disease, showing that pathological remodeling is a promising therapeutic target

394 in CCC.

395

396 Financial Disclosure statement

397 The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish,

398 or preparation of the manuscript.

399

400

19
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

401 Acknowledgments :

402 We thank all the patients and their relatives.

403

404 Funding sources :

405 This work was supported by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological

406 Development – CNPq, from the São Paulo State Research Funding Agency - FAPESP

407 (2013/50302-3, and 2014/50890-5) and from the National Institutes of Health/USA (grant

408 numbers: 2 P50 AI098461–02 and 2U19AI098461–06). ECN and JK are recipients of

409 productivity awards by CNPq. AFF, MB, PCT and LRPF held fellowships from the

410 FAPESP. ECN and JK are recipients of a productivity award from CNPq. This work was

411 also supported by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale

412 (INSERM); the Aix-Marseille University (AMIDEX “International_2018”

413 MITOMUTCHAGAS), the French Agency for Research (Agence Nationale de la

414 Recherche-ANR (“Br-Fr-Chagas” and “landscardio”). This project has received funding

415 from the Excellence Initiative of Aix-Marseille University (A*Midex) a French

416 “Investissements d’Avenir programme”- Institute MarMaRa AMX-19-IET-007. The

417 funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or

418 preparation of the manuscript.

419

420 Author contributions :

421 Development of methodology and experimental work: MAB, LRPF, PCT, AISM, AFF,

422 AK.

423 Histological analysis: RHBS, VD, LAB, FAG, FB, PP, FB.

424 Statistical analysis: MAB, PCT, ECN.

425 Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: CC, JK, ECN.

20
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

426 References

427 1. Coura JR, Borges-Pereira J. Chagas disease: 100 years after its discovery. A systemic

428 review. Acta Trop 2010; 115:5-13.

429 2. Schofield CJ, Jannin J, Salvatella R. The future of Chagas disease control. Trends

430 Parasitol 2006; 22:583-8.

431 3. Rassi A, Jr., Rassi A, Marin-Neto JA. Chagas disease. Lancet 2010; 375:1388-402.

432 4. Acquatella H. Echocardiography in Chagas heart disease. Circulation 2007; 115:1124-

433 31.

434 5. Benchimol-Barbosa PR, Barbosa-Filho J. Mechanical cardiac remodeling and new-

435 onset atrial fibrillation in long-term follow-up of subjects with chronic Chagas' disease.

436 Braz J Med Biol Res 2009; 42:251-62.

437 6. Kret M, Arora R. Pathophysiological basis of right ventricular remodeling. J

438 Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2007; 12:5-14.

439 7. Levick SP, Goldspink PH. Could interferon-gamma be a therapeutic target for treating

440 heart failure? Heart Fail Rev 2014; 19:227-36.

441 8. Liu P, Sun M, Sader S. Matrix metalloproteinases in cardiovascular disease. Can J

442 Cardiol 2006; 22 Suppl B:25B-30B.

443 9. Kehat I, Molkentin JD. Molecular pathways underlying cardiac remodeling during

444 pathophysiological stimulation. Circulation 2010; 122:2727-35.

445 10. Mihl C, Dassen WR, Kuipers H. Cardiac remodelling: concentric versus eccentric

446 hypertrophy in strength and endurance athletes. Neth Heart J 2008; 16:129-33.

447 11. Chen Q, Jin M, Yang F, Zhu J, Xiao Q, Zhang L. Matrix metalloproteinases:

448 inflammatory regulators of cell behaviors in vascular formation and remodeling.

449 Mediators Inflamm 2013; 2013:928315.

21
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

450 12. Apte SS, Parks WC. Metalloproteinases: A parade of functions in matrix biology and

451 an outlook for the future. Matrix Biol 2015; 44-46:1-6.

452 13. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases

453 and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69:562-73.

454 14. Spinale FG, Villarreal F. Targeting matrix metalloproteinases in heart disease: lessons

455 from endogenous inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol 2014; 90:7-15.

456 15. Niu H, Li Y, Li H, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 12 modulates high-fat-diet induced

457 glomerular fibrogenesis and inflammation in a mouse model of obesity. Sci Rep 2016;

458 6:20171.

459 16. Lindsey ML, Zamilpa R. Temporal and spatial expression of matrix

460 metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases following myocardial

461 infarction. Cardiovasc Ther 2012; 30:31-41.

462 17. Morishita T, Uzui H, Mitsuke Y, et al. Predictive utility of the changes in matrix

463 metalloproteinase-2 in the early phase for left ventricular reverse remodeling after an

464 acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4:e001359.

465 18. Spinale FG, Zile MR. Integrating the myocardial matrix into heart failure recognition

466 and management. Circ Res 2013; 113:725-38.

467 19. Yasmin, McEniery CM, Wallace S, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9),

468 MMP-2, and serum elastase activity are associated with systolic hypertension and arterial

469 stiffness. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005; 25:372.

470 20. Spinale FG. Myocardial matrix remodeling and the matrix metalloproteinases:

471 influence on cardiac form and function. Physiol Rev 2007; 87:1285-342.

472 21. Ma Y, de Castro Bras LE, Toba H, et al. Myofibroblasts and the extracellular matrix

473 network in post-myocardial infarction cardiac remodeling. Pflugers Arch 2014;

474 466:1113-27.

22
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

475 22. Bautista-Lopez NL, Morillo CA, Lopez-Jaramillo P, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases

476 2 and 9 as diagnostic markers in the progression to Chagas cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J

477 2013; 165:558-66.

478 23. Fares RC, Gomes Jde A, Garzoni LR, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 are

479 differentially expressed in patients with indeterminate and cardiac clinical forms of

480 Chagas disease. Infect Immun 2013; 81:3600-8.

481 24. Polyakova V, Loeffler I, Hein S, et al. Fibrosis in endstage human heart failure: severe

482 changes in collagen metabolism and MMP/TIMP profiles. Int J Cardiol 2011; 151:18-33.

483 25. Rubis P, Wisniowska-Smialek S, Wypasek E, et al. Fibrosis of extracellular matrix is

484 related to the duration of the disease but is unrelated to the dynamics of collagen

485 metabolism in dilated cardiomyopathy. Inflamm Res 2016; 65:941-9.

486 26. Kaushik DK, Hahn JN, Yong VW. EMMPRIN, an upstream regulator of MMPs, in

487 CNS biology. Matrix Biol 2015; 44-46:138-46.

488 27. Siwik DA, Kuster GM, Brahmbhatt JV, et al. EMMPRIN mediates beta-adrenergic

489 receptor-stimulated matrix metalloproteinase activity in cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell

490 Cardiol 2008; 44:210-7.

491 28. Bocchi EA, Guimaraes G, Tarasoutshi F, Spina G, Mangini S, Bacal F.

492 Cardiomyopathy, adult valve disease and heart failure in South America. Heart 2009;

493 95:181-9.

494 29. Jorge MT, Macedo TA, Janones RS, Carizzi DP, Heredia RA, Acha RE. Types of

495 arrhythmia among cases of American trypanosomiasis, compared with those in other

496 cardiology patients. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2003; 97:139-48.

497 30. Hu X, Beeton C. Detection of functional matrix metalloproteinases by zymography.

498 J Vis Exp 2010.

23
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

499 31. Li H, Simon H, Bocan TM, Peterson JT. MMP/TIMP expression in spontaneously

500 hypertensive heart failure rats: the effect of ACE- and MMP-inhibition. Cardiovasc Res

501 2000; 46:298-306.

502 32. Schulz R. Intracellular targets of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in cardiac disease:

503 rationale and therapeutic approaches. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2007; 47:211-42.

504 33. Vanhoutte D, Schellings M, Pinto Y, Heymans S. Relevance of matrix

505 metalloproteinases and their inhibitors after myocardial infarction: a temporal and spatial

506 window. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69:604-13.

507 34. Gutierrez FR, Lalu MM, Mariano FS, et al. Increased activities of cardiac matrix

508 metalloproteinases matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 are associated with

509 mortality during the acute phase of experimental Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J Infect

510 Dis 2008; 197:1468-76.

511 35. Tao ZY, Cavasin MA, Yang F, Liu YH, Yang XP. Temporal changes in matrix

512 metalloproteinase expression and inflammatory response associated with cardiac rupture

513 after myocardial infarction in mice. Life Sci 2004; 74:1561-72.

514 36. Bradham WS, Bozkurt B, Gunasinghe H, Mann D, Spinale FG. Tumor necrosis

515 factor-alpha and myocardial remodeling in progression of heart failure: a current

516 perspective. Cardiovasc Res 2002; 53:822-30.

517 37. Deschamps AM, Spinale FG. Pathways of matrix metalloproteinase induction in heart

518 failure: bioactive molecules and transcriptional regulation. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69:666-

519 76.

520 38. Costa VM, Torres KC, Mendonca RZ, Gresser I, Gollob KJ, Abrahamsohn IA. Type

521 I IFNs stimulate nitric oxide production and resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J

522 Immunol 2006; 177:3193-200.

24
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

523 39. de Pinho RT, da Silva WS, de Castro Cortes LM, da Silva Vasconcelos Sousa P, de

524 Araujo Soares RO, Alves CR. Production of MMP-9 and inflammatory cytokines by

525 Trypanosoma cruzi-infected macrophages. Exp Parasitol 2014; 147:72-80.

526 40. Medeiros NI, Fares RC, Franco EP, et al. Differential Expression of Matrix

527 Metalloproteinases 2, 9 and Cytokines by Neutrophils and Monocytes in the Clinical

528 Forms of Chagas Disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017; 11:e0005284.

529 41. Brew K, Nagase H. The tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): an ancient

530 family with structural and functional diversity. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010; 1803:55-71.

531 42. Ohbayashi H, Shimokata K. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and airway remodeling in

532 asthma. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 2005; 4:177-81.

533 43. Clark EH, Marks MA, Gilman RH, et al. Circulating serum markers and QRS scar

534 score in Chagas cardiomyopathy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2015; 92:39-44.

535 44. Sherbuk JE, Okamoto EE, Marks MA, et al. Biomarkers and mortality in severe

536 Chagas cardiomyopathy. Glob Heart 2015; 10:173-80.

537 45. Laugier L, Frade AF, Ferreira FM, et al. Whole-Genome Cardiac DNA Methylation

538 Fingerprint and Gene Expression Analysis Provide New Insights in the Pathogenesis of

539 Chronic Chagas Disease Cardiomyopathy. Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65:1103-11.

540 46. Souza BSF, Silva DN, Carvalho RH, et al. Association of Cardiac Galectin-3

541 Expression, Myocarditis, and Fibrosis in Chronic Chagas Disease Cardiomyopathy. Am

542 J Pathol 2017; 187:1134-46.

543 47. Nonaka CKV, Sampaio GL, Silva KN, et al. Therapeutic miR-21 Silencing Reduces

544 Cardiac Fibrosis and Modulates Inflammatory Response in Chronic Chagas Disease. Int

545 J Mol Sci 2021; 22.

25
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

546 48. Ramires FJ, Salemi VM, Ianni BM, et al. Aldosterone antagonism in an inflammatory

547 state: evidence for myocardial protection. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst 2006;

548 7:162-7.

549 49. Fernandes F, Ramires FJ, Ianni BM, et al. Effect of colchicine on myocardial injury

550 induced by Trypanosoma cruzi in experimental Chagas disease. J Card Fail 2012; 18:654-

551 9.

552 50. Soares MB, Lima RS, Souza BS, et al. Reversion of gene expression alterations in

553 hearts of mice with chronic chagasic cardiomyopathy after transplantation of bone

554 marrow cells. Cell Cycle 2011; 10:1448-55.

555

556

557

558 Figure Legends

559 Figure 1. Histopathological features of myocardial samples. (A) Slides of hematoxylin-

560 eosin (H&E) and picrosirius red stained myocardial sections of representative patients with

561 CCC, DCM and individuals without cardiomyopathies (Controls). Representative heart

562 sections were shown with magnification: 20X. Myocardial hypertrophy characterized by fiber

563 and nuclear enlargement is evident in the CCC and DCM groups. Lymphocytic myocarditis

564 is present only in the CCC group. Interstitial fibrosis stained in red with picrosirius red is

565 present in the CCC and DCM groups. (B) The severity of fibrosis was quantified by collagen

566 area fraction (%) in DCM and CCC group exhibit a significant increase in the deposition of

567 collagen. Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test)

568 with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results were expressed as

569 mean±SEM. * P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05) corrected for multiple

570 comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

26
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

571

572 Figure 2. MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA and protein expression and activity in

573 myocardium tissue from control, DCM and CCC samples.

574 Myocardial expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA. Real-time PCR analysis of mRNA

575 expression in control (n=6), DCM (n=12) and CCC (n=17) myocardium. The expression was

576 calculated as the mean ± SEM for each group as individual data points using the relative

577 expression (fold change over control) by the 2–ΔΔCt method, normalized with the endogenous

578 gene RPL0, as described in Methods section. (A) Relative expression of MMP-2 mRNA and

579 MMP-9 mRNA. (B) Western blotting image showing protein of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in

580 extracts from myocardium samples from the control, DCM and CCC (n= 5 in each group).

581 The densitometric values of each protein for each sample were normalized by the values of

582 Beta actin, as described in methods section. Densitometry analysis of the MMP-2.

583 Densitometry analysis of the MMP-9. (C) Zimography image showing activity of MMP-2 and

584 MMP-9 in extracts from myocardium samples from control, DCM and CCC (n= 5 in each

585 group). (D) Densitometry analysis of the activated MMP-2 (66 kD band) and activated MMP-

586 9 (88kD band) results. Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-Whitney

587 Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results were

588 expressed as mean±SEM. * P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05) corrected

589 for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

590 Primary antibodies (with their respective dilution) against the following proteins were used:

591 MMP-2 (mouse monoclonal, 1:1000, Abcam, UK); MMP-3 (rabbit polyclonal, 1: 500,

592 Abcam, UK); MMP-8 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:500, UK); MMP-9 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000,

593 UK); MMP-12 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000, UK); MMP-13 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000, UK);

594 EMMPRIN (mouse monoclonal, 1:500, Santa Cruz, Biotechnology, USA); TIMP-1 (1:1000);

595 TIMP-2 (1:1000); TIMP-3 (goat plyclonal,1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA); TIMP-4

27
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

596 (goat plyclonal,1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA); Reck (mouse polyclonal,1:1000,

597 Abcam, UK). Anti- beta-actin antibody (mouse monoclonal, 1:2000, Sigma, USA), was used

598 to detect beta-actin, used as protein loading control. All antibodies were diluted in TBST and

599 incubated at 4˚C overnight. After washing twice over 30 minutes with TBST, each membrane

600 was incubated with compatible secondary antibodies horseradish peroxidase conjugate (goat

601 anti-rabbit, rabbit anti-goat or goat anti-mouse, 1:10000, Calbiochem, USA) for 2h at room

602 temperature.

603

604 Figure 3. Tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) mRNA expression and protein expression

605 in heart tissue from CCC and DCM samples

606 Real-time PCR analysis of mRNA expression in control (n=6), DCM (n=12) and CCC (n=17)

607 myocardium. The expression was calculated as the mean ± SEM for each group as individual

608 data points using the relative expression (fold change over control) by the 2–ΔΔCt method,

609 normalized with the endogenous gene RPL0, as described in Methods section. (A) Relative

610 expression of TIMP-1 mRNA; TIMP-2 mRNA; TIMP-3 mRNA; TIMP-4 mRNA. (B)

611 Western blotting image showing protein of the 21 kDa TIMP-2 bands in extracts from

612 myocardium samples from the control, DCM and CCC (n= 5 in each group). The

613 densitometric values of TIMP-2 protein for each sample were normalized by the values of 42

614 kD Beta actin band, as described in methods section. Groups were compared by a non-

615 parametrical test (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version

616 6.0; GraphPad). Results were expressed as mean±SEM. * P-values were considered

617 significant if p value (0.05) corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method

618 (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

619

620 Figure 4. Ratios of MMP2/TIMP in heart tissue from CCC and DCM samples

28
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

621 Activity of MMP-2 / expression protein TIMP stoichiometric ratios were calculated for

622 samples CCC, DCM and control. (A) MMP-2/TIMP-1. (B) MMP-2/TIMP-2. (C) MMP-

623 2/TIMP-3. (D) MMP-2/TIMP-4. * P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05)

624 corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p

625 value=0.05/3=0.0166).

626

627

628 Figure 5. Ratios of MMP9/TIMP in heart tissue from CCC and DCM samples

629 Activity of MMP-9 / expression protein TIMP stoichiometric ratios were calculated for

630 samples CCC, DCM and control (A) MMP-9/TIMP-1. (B) MMP-9/TIMP-2. (C) MMP-

631 9/TIMP-3. (D) MMP-9/TIMP-4. Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-

632 Whitney Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results

633 were expressed as mean±SEM and arbitrary units. * P-values were considered significant if p

634 value (0.05) corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p

635 value=0.05/3=0.0166).

636

637 Figure 6. Expression of MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN in heart

638 tissue from CCC and DCM samples

639 Myocardial expression of MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN mRNA. Real-time PCR

640 analysis of mRNA expression in control (n=6), DCM (n=12) and CCC (n=17) myocardium.

641 The expression was calculated as the mean ± SEM for each group as individual data points

642 using the relative expression (fold change over control) by 2–ΔΔCt method, normalized with the

643 endogenous gene RPL0, as described in methods section. (A) Relative expression of MMP-

644 12 mRNA. (B) Relative expression of MMP-13 mRNA. (C) Relative expression of

645 EMMPRIN mRNA. The expression of mRNA of MMP-3 and MMP-8 was undetectable in all

29
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

646 samples tested (data no show). (D) Densitometry analysis of the MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-12,

647 MMP-13 and EMMPRIN.

648 Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) with

649 GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results were expressed as mean±SEM. *

650 P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05) corrected for multiple comparisons by

651 Bonferroni’s method (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

652

30
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

653 Figure legends

654 Figure 1. Histopathological features of myocardial samples.

655 (A) Slides of hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and picrosirius red stained myocardial sections of

656 representative patients with CCC, DCM and individuals without cardiomyopathies (Controls).

657 Representative heart sections were shown with magnification: 20X. Myocardial hypertrophy

658 characterized by fiber and nuclear enlargement is evident in the CCC and DCM groups.

659 Lymphocytic myocarditis is present only in the CCC group. Interstitial fibrosis stained in red

660 with picrosirius red is present in the CCC and DCM groups. (B) The severity of fibrosis was

661 quantified by collagen area fraction (%) in DCM and CCC group exhibit a significant increase

662 in the deposition of collagen. Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-

663 Whitney Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results

664 were expressed as mean±SEM. * P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05)

665 corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p

666 value=0.05/3=0.0166).

667

668 Figure 2. MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA and protein expression and activity in

669 myocardium tissue from control, DCM and CCC samples.

670 Myocardial expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 mRNA. Real-time PCR analysis of mRNA

671 expression in control (n=6), DCM (n=12) and CCC (n=17) myocardium. The expression was

672 calculated as the mean ± SEM for each group as individual data points using the relative

673 expression (fold change over control) by the 2–ΔΔCt method, normalized with the

674 endogenous gene RPL0, as described in Methods section. (A) Relative expression of MMP-

675 2 mRNA and MMP-9 mRNA. (B) Western blotting image showing protein of MMP-2 and

676 MMP-9 in extracts from myocardium samples from the control, DCM and CCC (n= 5 in each

677 group). The densitometric values of each protein for each sample were normalized by the

31
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

678 values of Beta actin, as described in methods section. Densitometry analysis of the MMP-2.

679 Densitometry analysis of the MMP-9. (C) Zimography image showing activity of MMP-2 and

680 MMP-9 in extracts from myocardium samples from control, DCM and CCC (n= 5 in each

681 group). (D) Densitometry analysis of the activated MMP-2 (66 kD band) and activated MMP-

682 9 (88kD band) results. Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-Whitney

683 Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results were

684 expressed as mean±SEM. * P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05) corrected

685 for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

686 Primary antibodies (with their respective dilution) against the following proteins were used:

687 MMP-2 (mouse monoclonal, 1:1000, Abcam, UK); MMP-3 (rabbit polyclonal, 1: 500,

688 Abcam, UK); MMP-8 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:500, UK); MMP-9 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000,

689 UK); MMP-12 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000, UK); MMP-13 (rabbit polyclonal, 1:1000, UK);

690 EMMPRIN (mouse monoclonal, 1:500, Santa Cruz, Biotechnology, USA); TIMP-1 (1:1000);

691 TIMP-2 (1:1000); TIMP-3 (goat plyclonal,1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA); TIMP-4

692 (goat plyclonal,1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA); Reck (mouse polyclonal,1:1000,

693 Abcam, UK). Anti- beta-actin antibody (mouse monoclonal, 1:2000, Sigma, USA), was used

694 to detect beta-actin, used as protein loading control. All antibodies were diluted in TBST and

695 incubated at 4˚C overnight. After washing twice over 30 minutes with TBST, each membrane

696 was incubated with compatible secondary antibodies horseradish peroxidase conjugate (goat

697 anti-rabbit, rabbit anti-goat or goat anti-mouse, 1:10000, Calbiochem, USA) for 2h at room

698 temperature.

699

700 Figure 3. Tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) mRNA expression and protein expression

701 in heart tissue from CCC and DCM samples

32
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

702 Real-time PCR analysis of mRNA expression in control (n=6), DCM (n=12) and CCC (n=17)

703 myocardium. The expression was calculated as the mean ± SEM for each group as individual

704 data points using the relative expression (fold change over control) by the 2–ΔΔCt method,

705 normalized with the endogenous gene RPL0, as described in Methods section. (A) Relative

706 expression of TIMP-1 mRNA; TIMP-2 mRNA; TIMP-3 mRNA; TIMP-4 mRNA. (B)

707 Western blotting image showing protein of the 21 kDa TIMP-2 bands in extracts from

708 myocardium samples from the control, DCM and CCC (n= 5 in each group). The

709 densitometric values of TIMP-2 protein for each sample were normalized by the values of 42

710 kD Beta actin band, as described in methods section. Groups were compared by a non-

711 parametrical test (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version

712 6.0; GraphPad). Results were expressed as mean±SEM. * P-values were considered

713 significant if p value (0.05) corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method

714 (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

715

716 Figure 4. Ratios of MMP2/TIMP in heart tissue from CCC and DCM samples

717 Activity of MMP-2 / expression protein TIMP stoichiometric ratios were calculated for

718 samples CCC, DCM and control. (A) MMP-2/TIMP-1. (B) MMP-2/TIMP-2. (C) MMP-

719 2/TIMP-3. (D) MMP-2/TIMP-4. * P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05)

720 corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p

721 value=0.05/3=0.0166).

722

723 Figure 5. Ratios of MMP9/TIMP in heart tissue from CCC and DCM samples

724 Activity of MMP-9 / expression protein TIMP stoichiometric ratios were calculated for

725 samples CCC, DCM and control (A) MMP-9/TIMP-1. (B) MMP-9/TIMP-2. (C) MMP-

726 9/TIMP-3. (D) MMP-9/TIMP-4. Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-

33
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

727 Whitney Rank Sum Test) with GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results

728 were expressed as mean±SEM and arbitrary units. * P-values were considered significant if p

729 value (0.05) corrected for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni’s method (corrected p

730 value=0.05/3=0.0166).

731

732 Figure 6. Expression of MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN in heart

733 tissue from CCC and DCM samples

734 Myocardial expression of MMP-12, MMP-13 and EMMPRIN mRNA. Real-time PCR

735 analysis of mRNA expression in control (n=6), DCM (n=12) and CCC (n=17) myocardium.

736 The expression was calculated as the mean ± SEM for each group as individual data points

737 using the relative expression (fold change over control) by 2–ΔΔCt method, normalized with

738 the endogenous gene RPL0, as described in methods section. (A) Relative expression of

739 MMP-12 mRNA. (B) Relative expression of MMP-13 mRNA. (C) Relative expression of

740 EMMPRIN mRNA. The expression of mRNA of MMP-3 and MMP-8 was undetectable in all

741 samples tested (data no show). (D) Densitometry analysis of the MMP-3, MMP-8, MMP-12,

742 MMP-13 and EMMPRIN.

743 Groups were compared by a non-parametrical test (Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test) with

744 GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0; GraphPad). Results were expressed as mean±SEM. *

745 P-values were considered significant if p value (0.05) corrected for multiple comparisons by

746 Bonferroni’s method (corrected p value=0.05/3=0.0166).

747

748

749

750

751

34
medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.17.21267825; this version posted December 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this
preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in
perpetuity.
All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.

752

753 Supplemental materials.

754 Supplemental Figure 1. Western blots showing MMP-3 (54 kD), -8 (65 kD), -12 (54 kD), -

755 13 and EMMPRIN/CD147 (60 kD) protein bands. Protein bands stained with specific

756 antibodies and developed as in Methods are depicted, together with the densitometric

757 measurements using beta actin as a loading control.

758

759 Supplemental Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used in gene expression analysis.

760 Supplemental Table 2. Histopathological features of the samples


761

35
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the study subjects.

CLINICAL PARAMETERS GROUPS

CCC DCM CONTROL

Age 47.8 ±14,2 40,6±17,1 28,3 ± 11,0

Male, n (%) 6 (35%) 9 (75%) 6 (100%)

Sample size, n 17 12 6

Body Surface (m2) 1.6 ± 0.3 1.7 ± 0.1 N.D.

Ejection Fraction- EF (%) 23.59 ± 8.5 21.6 ± 7.9 N.D.

Fractional shortening (%) 11.94 ± 7.3 12.2 ± 3.7 N.D.

Left ventricular end diastolic


62.12 ± 98 70.6 ± 19.8 N.D.
diameter LVEDD (mm)

Left ventricular end systolic


48.82 ± 15.6 62.7 ± 20.1 N.D.
diameter LVESD (mm)

Ventricular Septum (mm) 8.53 ± 1.7 8.3 ± 1.4 N.D.

Posterior wall of left ventricle


8.5 ± 1.8 8.6 ± 1.4 N.D.
(mm)

Left atrial diameter (mm) 49.18 ± 5.5 52.1 ± 7.4 N.D.

Aortic sinus (mm) 29.53 ± 3.1 31.8 ± 5.3 N.D.

Myocardial mass index (g/m2) 187.88 ± 69.3 233.8 ± 76.6 N.D.


Relative wall thickness (mm) 0.68 ± 0.5 0.60 ± 0.1 N.D.

Diastolic volume (ml) 288.41 ± 136.6 349.9 ± 131.8 N.D.

Systolic volume (ml) 194.06 ± 131.8 267.5 ± 127.4 N.D.

N.D.: not done.

Control: Heart donors; DCM: Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; CCC: Chronic Chagas

cardiomyopathy.

Datas were expressed as mean ± SD.

Reference values: EF: Ejection Fraction (>55%); Ejection Fraction - EF (25-43%); Left

ventricular end diastolic diameter - LVESD (mm): (42-59mm); Left ventricular end systolic

diameter – LVESD (mm): (25-39mm); Ventricular Septum (mm): (6-10mm); Posterior wall

of the left ventricule (mm): (6-10mm); Left atrial diameter (mm): (30-40mm); Aortic sinus

(mm): (31-47mm); Myocardial mass index (g/m2): (49-115 g/m2); Relative wall thickness

(mm): (<0.42).

You might also like