Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peer Pressure Scale
Peer Pressure Scale
Methods
Participants
Participants in this study comprised of 120 Adolescent students (78 boys and 44 girls) selected
from two Secondary schools in Ikwerre Local Government Area. They are; Community
Participant’s ages ranged from 13-17 years with a mean age of 16.8 and SD of 9.68. Multi-stage
sampling technique involving cluster, simple random (balloting) and purposive sampling
techniques were used for data collection. On participants’ demographics; information indicated
that 49 were in Jss1 while 73 were Jss2, 99 in Jss3, 10 were in Sss1, and 11 were in Ss2, while 2
were in Sss3. On ethnicity, it was indicated that 78 were Ikwerre, 22 were Igbo, 9 were Yoruba
and 13 indicated Others. 94 indicated that they are Christians, 27 indicated Muslims and 1 was
Instruments
two instruments were used for data collection. The instruments are; Peer pressure scale by
Santor, Messervey and Kusumakar (2000), and Adolsents’s smoking habits questionnaire by
that assesses peer pressure. The Peer Pressure Scale was developed and validated by Santor,
Messervey and Kusumakar. There are 11 items on the scales which assess peer pressure. All
items are direct scored. Examples of items are; “If my friends are drinking, it would be hard for
me to resist having a drink”. “I’ve skipped classes, when others have urged me to”. Respondents
circle one of the five numbered response categories ranging from; (5) strongly agree, (4) agree,
(3) undecided, (2) disagree, (1) strongly disagree. The developers obtained a Cronbach alpha
of .82. Nwoke, Ogba and Ugwu (2012) revalidated the scale for Nigerian use, using 233 students
from the University of Nigerian Nsukka. The reliability analysis of the pilot study shows
Procedure
Multi-stage sampling technique was used for data collection in this study. At the first stage,
Secondary schools in Port Harcourt were organized into clusters. Simple random sampling
technique (Balloting) was used to draw three Secondary schools. At the second stage, Purposive
sampling technique was used to select participants in this study who fit into the required age
bracket.
The researcher obtained a Letter of Identification from the Department of Psychology, Rivers
State University to enable easy access to the Schools’ management, teachers and participants to
carry out this study at the three selected secondary schools. Participants were drawn from the
pool of Secondary school students. A multi-stage sampling technique was employed for this
study. At the first stage, Simple random sampling (balloting) was used to select the secondary
schools for the study, while purposive was used to select participants. The Principals in the
schools directed three teachers to assist the researcher with the administration of the copies of
questionnaires. The teachers who assisted the researcher were properly educated on the
modalities of administering, filling and collecting the questionnaires. The participants were
assured that their responses will be treated with utmost confidentiality and that participation is
administered in each of the three schools drawn. However, one hundred and twenty six (120)
copies of questionnaires were properly filled and used for data analysis. This was because 6
copies of the questionnaires were missing or not properly filled. Participants were debriefed and
Design/statistics
Cross-sectional survey design was adopted for the study; this is a means of data collection to
make inferences about a population of interest at one point in time. Analysis of data was done
using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM version 23 software.
Regression analysis was used because the researcher intends to find out the level of interaction
RESULT
Data obtained from participants were analyzed by computing the means, standard deviations and
correlations among the study variables. Multiple regression was conducted to test the hypothesis.
The variables were entered into the equation in models to test the extent to which they predicted
premarital sex.
Table 1: Means, standard deviations, and correlations for demographic variables, peer
pressure, and adolescent smoking habits
S/N Variables M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Age 14.96 1.42
2 Gender 1.43 .49 .014
3 BP 2.58 1.45 .061 .210*
4 Religious aff. 1.08 .33 .043 .288** .004
5 Ethnic Group 1.95 1.20 .033 .079 -.157 -.200*
6 Class 3.43 1.49 .052 .244**-.097 .249** -1.38
7 PP 32.48 11.02 .053 -.127 -.031 -.080 .103 -.143
8 ASH 10.6 2.35 -.038 -.002 .051 .002 .145 .177 -.090
Note: N=120, *=p<.05(two tailed), **p<.01(two tailed), Age was coded in years, BP = Birth position, Religious aff.= Religious
affiliation; Class= 1= jss1, 2= jss2, 3= jss3, 4= ss1, 5= ss2, 6= ss3; PP= Peer pressure; ASH= Adolescent smoking habit.
Gender was coded 1= male, 2= female; ethnic group was coded 1= ikwerre, 2= igbo, 3= Yoruba, 4= others; Religious affiliation
was coded 1= Christian, 2= Muslim, 3= traditional.
Result of the correlation table show that birth position is significantly related to age (r= .210, p<.05).
Religious affiliation is significantly related to birth position (r= .288, p<.05). Ethnic group is significantly
related to birth position (r= -.157, p<.05), and religious affiliation (r= -.200, p<.05). Class is only
significantly related to gender (r= .244**, p<.01), religious affiliation (r= .249**, p<.01), ethnic group (r=
-1.38, p<.05). Peer pressure is significantly related to gender (r= -.127, p<.05), ethnic group (r= .145,
p<.05), and class (r= -.177, p<.05). Adolescent smoking habits is significantly related to (r= .103, p<.05),
Table 2: Showing the prediction of ‘adolescent smoking habit’ from control variables, and
peer pressure
Note. N= 120,* = p< .05 (two tailed), ** = p<.01 (two tailed). Religious aff. = religious affiliation; PP = Peer
pressure.
Regression result in table 2 above indicated of all the control variables, Gender predicted
adolescent smoking habit (β = -.112, t= -1.11, p<.05). Birth Position predicted adolescent
smoking habit (β = .136, t= 1.42, p<.05). Ethnic group predicted adolescent smoking habit (β
= .215, t= 2.23, p<.05). Class also predicted adolescent smoking habit (β = .246, t= 2.54, p<.05).
But jointly, the control variables accounted for a less than 1% non-significant variance as a
predictor of adolescent smoking habit (R2∆ = .085, p<.05). Peer pressure entered in model two of
the equation did significantly predict adolescent smoking habit (β = -.185, t = 3.88, p<.05). It
accounted for a non-significant variance as a predictor of premarital sex (R2∆ = .007, p <.05).
Summary of Findings
In the correlation result adolescent smoking habit was significantly related to class only
but not significantly related to age, birth position, gender, religious affiliation, ethnic
Of all the control variables, gender, birth position, ethnic group and class significantly